Department: Educational Leadership and Instructional Technology
|
|
- Phoebe Sutton
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Overview: Department: Educational Leadership and Instructional Technology Report Preparer: Dr. Farough Abed Program Name and Level: Educational Technology Masters of Science Program Assessment Questions: 1. URL: 2. LO Changes: There were no changes in the learning outcomes. 3. Strengths: The assessment process is working very well and data collected by faculty and tabulated by program director is effective and reliable. In addition, focus group from student body meet annually to discuss how to strengthen the courses, projects, provide more relevancy to the public school, and further underscore the design (instruction and visual design) of the courses. 4. Improvements: In general, students are receiving additional tutorials as well as more lab time to improve their skills and build more confidence. The data gathered from 2013 is an opportunity for the faculty to improve, clarify, and enhance the overall graduate students learning outcomes and the graduate program as a whole. The following is a description of changes for the program: 1. Courses must exhibit strong linkage in the sequence of courses. Since the program is designed as a strong developmental model, linkage insures that the unity among courses is maintained. 2. Redundancy must be eliminated among courses/projects in the area of technology. 3. All courses must reflect the program goal of effective design, production, and evaluation of instructional materials using technology. All courses will provide extra remediation through stand-alone instruction and lecture recordings A critical change was the delivery of instruction either online classes or as a hybrid course. Due to the nature of the graduate students lifestyles, work locations, and learning styles, online became available in the Fall, Spring and Summer terms. For instance, the EDT 500 Fall class offers one section as an online hybrid experience. Summer courses such as EDT 532, and 598 are online courses and have become even more critical since ET graduate students have summer jobs or family commitments. As a side note, graduate students still have a strong preference for face-
2 to-face courses. Group interaction, observing other students work, and direct feedback were some of the reasons expressed in comments. EDT 514 & EDT 533 Distance Learning II Through several years of review of the program via focus groups, and student course evaluation, the program has decided to withdraw two courses: EDT 514 and 533 from its requirements. Instead, graduate students will see the objectives associated with these courses in all course. By imbedding the objectives into the classes, students will have stronger association and richer meaning. Summary of program revision The current requirement for a Masters in Educational Technology stands at 30 credits. This is a change from 36 credits. This was an academic decision (stronger linkage among courses). Graduate students in the focus group consistently argued that the program should move toward a 30 credits to allow early graduation and meaningful financial commitment. 1. EDT 500 Instructional Design and Evaluation I 2. EDT 501 Message Design and Production I 3. EDT 510 Design Tools 4. EDT 512 Computer-based Instruction 5. EDT 521 Interactive Multimedia for Instruction I 6. EDT 522 Instructional Design and Evaluation II 7. EDT 531 Interactive Multimedia for Instruction II 8. EDT 532 Distance Learning and Networking I 9. EDT 598 Inquiry in Educational Technology 10. EDT 597 Final Project P lan NOTE: EDT 514 as now an online course that is offered as a non-major course. One of the unique changes to the program and to Central CT State University is laptop loaning. ET students are supported with fully loaded new Mac laptops to augment their classroom experience. The laptops have made the technology universal what they see and do in the classroom is available at home or at work through their laptops. The cost savings in hardware and software has been a tremendous economic boost to students. This coming academic year, starting in the Fall, graduate students will be using ipads to support various experiences in the graduate courses. The ipads are not loaned to the students like the laptops, but are available in all of the classrooms. The inclusion of ipads was not meant to show the latest toy but to link apps development, ibook authoring, diagnostic tools, and other productivity solutions to effective instruction.
3 LO #1 The students will be able to understand and apply technology skills in the development of instruction Assessment Instruments: Faculty initially use project evaluations to reflect course outcomes as well as the learning outcomes. Students apply their skills (instructional design, production skills, and evaluation) to realistic classroom needs/problems to demonstrate how well they synthesized their skills. The assessment of classroom projects is based on previously agreed rubrics. The data for each learning outcome is collected using scoring rubrics specific to each course on the basis of 1. Mini hands-on projects (50%) 2. Major final hands-on project (40%) 3. Class participation (10%) 4. Capstone project At the end of each semester, faculty is required to complete a learning outcome form for each graduate course. Interpretation: Faculty input data using students projects unto Learning Outcome Form and submit to program director who gathers all the data forms, tabulates the data, and interpret them. This is similar procedure for all learning outcomes. Results: Conclusion Technology skills are technical in nature, requiring mastery of software and hardware to support production of effective instruction. Programming, video and audio, digital publishing, and web are types of software programs that are considered tools and delivery systems that graduate students understand and apply throughout their classes. The process of understanding and applying these technical skills takes time and practice. To support this learning outcome, laptops that are configured with all types of software programs are loaned to the students with the understanding that practice makes perfect. The majority of students (85%) exceeded expectation, whereas 14% somewhat met expectation. This is expected: the 14% require more time and even more direct one-on-one experience. Even with equal lab time (40% of class sessions is lab) to work on class projects, this percentage of students lacks confidence. They have the skills but lack confidence to move toward an independent status.
4 Evidence: The data collected from all classes using the Learning Outcome form for each learning outcome is presented in the chart below. Changes: Students are provided with more practice and additional exercises to complete at home using the laptops along with online tutorials. Students have additional lab time with faculty to work oneon-one.
5 LO #2 The students will be able to understand and apply the instructional Design Process Assessment Instruments: Faculty initially use project evaluations to reflect course outcomes as well as the learning outcomes. Students apply their skills (instructional design, production skills, and evaluation) to realistic classroom needs/problems to demonstrate how well they synthesized their skills. The assessment of classroom projects is based on previously agreed rubrics. The data for each learning outcome is collected using scoring rubrics specific to each course on the basis of 1. Mini hands-on projects (50%) 2. Major final hands-on project (40%) 3. Class participation (10%) 4. Capstone project At the end of each semester, faculty is required to complete a learning outcome form for each graduate course. Interpretation: Faculty input data using students projects unto Learning Outcome Form and submit to program director who gathers all the data forms, tabulates the data, and interpret them. This is similar procedure for all learning outcomes. Results: Conclusion The instructional design process is critical to the development of effective instruction and students not only need to understand but apply it throughout their projects. This is the foundation learning outcome that becomes the glue to all of the students development as instructional designers. 95% of students exceeded expectation in all the courses in understanding and applying this process. 4% somewhat met that expectation and finally 1% did not meet the expectation. The data is healthy and shows that the majority of the ET graduate students performed exceedingly well. The group of students who fell in the second and third category is expected. Delays in submitting projects and weakness in grasping and applying the instructional design process are some of the reasons. Instructional design is a natural process for most teachers and trainers in the program to grasp and apply.
6 Evidence: The data collected from all classes using the Learning Outcome form for each learning outcome is presented in the chart below. Changes: To deal with the small percentage of students who somewhat meet the expectations and did not meet expectation, there will be an increase in tutorials and exercises for them to practice. Students are provided with more practice and additional exercises to complete at home using the laptops along with online tutorials. Students have additional lab time with faculty to work oneon-one.
7 LO #3 The students will be able to understand and apply the production skills in the development of instruction Assessment Instruments: Faculty initially use project evaluations to reflect course outcomes as well as the learning outcomes. Students apply their skills (instructional design, production skills, and evaluation) to realistic classroom needs/problems to demonstrate how well they synthesized their skills. The assessment of classroom projects is based on previously agreed rubrics. The data for each learning outcome is collected using scoring rubrics specific to each course on the basis of 1. Mini hands-on projects (50%) 2. Major final hands-on project (40%) 3. Class participation (10%) 4. Capstone project At the end of each semester, faculty is required to complete a learning outcome form for each graduate course. Interpretation: Faculty input data using students projects unto Learning Outcome Form and submit to program director who gathers all the data forms, tabulates the data, and interpret them. This is similar procedure for all learning outcomes. Results: Conclusion Production skills are the applied side of the program. It allows the instructional design skills and the technical skills to interact in a process call production. Graduate students throughout the program learn to produce their design plan and follow a production process that reflects time management, production blueprint, resource allocation, and technical requirements. In other words, did they do it on time, did it match the design plan, and was it as effective as the plan articulated? Production skills allows students to see an end product that they can evaluate and compare with the design plan and understand why sometimes the end product is not the same as the plan. The more students complete projects, the more the design plan and end product become the same. It is a synthesis process. This learning outcome is solid. 82% exceeded expectation while 13% somewhat met expectation. The difference in percentage reflects confidence, practice, project management, independent work, and leadership skills.
8 Evidence: The data collected from all classes using the Learning Outcome form for each learning outcome is presented in the chart below. Changes: To deal with the small percentage of students who somewhat meet the expectations and did not meet expectation, there will be an increase in tutorials and exercises for them to practice. Students are provided with more practice and additional exercises to complete at home using the laptops along with online tutorials. Students have additional lab time with faculty to work oneon-one.
9 LO #4 Students will be able to understand, apply and evaluation standards to various instructional programs Assessment Instruments: Faculty initially use project evaluations to reflect course outcomes as well as the learning outcomes. Students apply their skills (instructional design, production skills, and evaluation) to realistic classroom needs/problems to demonstrate how well they synthesized their skills. The assessment of classroom projects is based on previously agreed rubrics. The data for each learning outcome is collected using scoring rubrics specific to each course on the basis of 1. Mini hands-on projects (50%) 2. Major final hands-on project (40%) 3. Class participation (10%) 4. Capstone project At the end of each semester, faculty is required to complete a learning outcome form for each graduate course. Interpretation: Faculty input data using students projects unto Learning Outcome Form and submit to program director who gathers all the data forms, tabulates the data, and interpret them. This is similar procedure for all learning outcomes. Results: Conclusion Graduate students learn and apply formative and summative evaluation strategies. Formative evaluation is used to assess how effective the design plan is: instructional strategies, instructional techniques, etc. Summative evaluation is brought in after the production is finished and there is a project to assess whether or not learning has taken place for students using this product. Once the data is collected, then students revise their project accordingly. Students understand and apply their own rubrics in creating formative and summative evaluation rubrics to better manage the effectiveness of the end project. Some rubrics are universal and are easily available online while others are specific to the project itself. The process of learning to evaluate their project underscores that good instructional designers are also good assessors. Some of the graduate students might not go on and design learning experiences but review and assess other products. The result for this learning outcome mirrors the production and design learning outcomes. The majority of students (98%) exceeded expectation and only 2% somewhat met expectation.
10 Evidence: The data collected from all classes using the Learning Outcome form for each learning outcome is presented in the chart below. Changes: To deal with the small percentage of students who somewhat meet the expectations and did not meet expectation, there will be an increase in tutorials and exercises for them to practice. Students are provided with more practice and additional exercises to complete at home using the laptops along with online tutorials. Students have additional lab time with faculty to work oneon-one.
11 LO #5 Students will be able to understand and apply The technology integration process Assessment Instruments: Faculty initially use project evaluations to reflect course outcomes as well as the learning outcomes. Students apply their skills (instructional design, production skills, and evaluation) to realistic classroom needs/problems to demonstrate how well they synthesized their skills. The assessment of classroom projects is based on previously agreed rubrics. The data for each learning outcome is collected using scoring rubrics specific to each course on the basis of 1. Mini hands-on projects (50%) 2. Major final hands-on project (40%) 3. Class participation (10%) 4. Capstone project At the end of each semester, faculty is required to complete a learning outcome form for each graduate course. Interpretation: Faculty input data using students projects unto Learning Outcome Form and submit to program director who gathers all the data forms, tabulates the data, and interpret them. This is similar procedure for all learning outcomes. Results: Conclusion Although the main focus of the program is the design, production, and evaluation of effective instruction, it is important to also focus on the integration skills where students learn how to implement a product (software or hardware) that is purchased or off the shelf. What is the process of implementing a product? What type of landmines can one expect? What are the stages of integration and its impact on the lesson plan or a design plan? Integration skills are valuable since they support the finding that most of the time teachers do not have the time to design and produce effective instruction and are more inclined to use existing products. This learning outcome data reflected a dedicated course EDT Integrating Technology in the curriculum. Results from the focus group, data from learning outcome forms, and student course evaluation revealed that it would be best to have integration skills imbedded throughout the courses and not
12 taught in one course. The program course requirement dropped EDT 514 and revamped all course objectives for the academic year to reflect integration objectives. This is a good move to insure that the best instructional designer also has great integration skills. For the academic year , 98% exceeded expectation and 2% somewhat met expectation. Students consistently mastered the integration process much more readily than designing a project from scratch. Evidence: The data collected from all classes using the Learning Outcome form for each learning outcome is presented in the chart below. Changes: To deal with the small percentage of students who somewhat meet the expectations and did not meet expectation, there will be an increase in tutorials and exercises for them to practice. Students are provided with more practice and additional exercises to complete at home using the laptops along with online tutorials. Students have additional lab time with faculty to work oneon-one.
13 LO #6 Students will be able to understand and apply inquiry skills in educational technology research Assessment Instruments: Faculty initially use project evaluations to reflect course outcomes as well as the learning outcomes. Students apply their skills (instructional design, production skills, and evaluation) to realistic classroom needs/problems to demonstrate how well they synthesized their skills. The assessment of classroom projects is based on previously agreed rubrics. The data for each learning outcome is collected using scoring rubrics specific to each course on the basis of 1. Mini hands-on projects (50%) 2. Major final hands-on project (40%) 3. Class participation (10%) 4. Capstone project At the end of each semester, faculty is required to complete a learning outcome form for each graduate course. Interpretation: Faculty input data using students projects unto Learning Outcome Form and submit to program director who gathers all the data forms, tabulates the data, and interpret them. This is similar procedure for all learning outcomes. Results: Conclusion Although the main focus of the program is the design, production, and evaluation of effective instruction, it is important to also focus on inquiry skills. An excellent instructional design is also a great researcher but not in the sense of applied research. The focus of this learning outcome is
14 more about what the literature in educational technology is saying. What are the findings on the effectiveness of instructional technology? The more students have reliable data from research studies, the stronger their design plan becomes. Their design decision is based on objective findings that are tied to research and avoid any subjectivity. The majority of students (90%) exceeded expectation while 8% somewhat met expectation and 2% did not meet expectation. To read and make sense of research articles and interpret them accurately takes some understanding of statistics and numbers in general. Some 2% have difficulty in this area. To improve on this, tutorials and stand-alone exercises are added to help future students. Evidence: The data collected from all classes using the Learning Outcome form for each learning outcome is presented in the chart below.
15 Changes: To deal with the small percentage of students who somewhat meet the expectations and did not meet expectation, there will be an increase in tutorials and exercises for them to practice. Students are provided with more practice and additional exercises to complete at home using the laptops along with online tutorials. Students have additional lab time with faculty to work oneon-one. LO #7 Students will be able to understand and apply leadership skills in applying instructional technology in their respective working environments. Assessment Instruments: Faculty initially use project evaluations to reflect course outcomes as well as the learning outcomes. Students apply their skills (instructional design, production skills, and evaluation) to realistic classroom needs/problems to demonstrate how well they synthesized their skills. The assessment of classroom projects is based on previously agreed rubrics. The data for each learning outcome is collected using scoring rubrics specific to each course on the basis of 1. Mini hands-on projects (50%) 2. Major final hands-on project (40%) 3. Class participation (10%) 4. Capstone project At the end of each semester, faculty is required to complete a learning outcome form for each graduate course. Interpretation: Faculty input data using students projects unto Learning Outcome Form and submit to program director who gathers all the data forms, tabulates the data, and interpret them. This is similar procedure for all learning outcomes. Results: Conclusion There are two components to leadership skills. One is project management and the other is leadership as a change agent in students respective working environments. The first set of skills is taught and monitored throughout the program since most in-class projects require planning and managing projects. Did they finish on time? What unforeseen obstacles did they come across that were not part of the plan? These and other questions can be taught and take on a major focus in this outcome. It is the second area: Leadership as change agent that is challenging. The issue is twofold:
16 monitoring the students as change agents and looking at evidence of change; and resistance to such roles in schools and businesses. The program is adding successful stories of ED Tech working in the school system. Also, the program is initiating an association for Ed Tech majors that will meet to discuss issues, solutions, ideas, etc. with one another. This will be monitored by an Ed Tech faculty member. Evidence: The data collected from all classes using the Learning Outcome form for each learning outcome is presented in the chart below.
17 General Education : Not applicable.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP Educational Technology Graduate Program ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW 2012 School of Education and Professional Studies, Central CT State University, New Britain, CT, 06053
More informationhttp://ccsu.smartcatalogiq.com/current/undergraduate-graduate-catalog/masters-degree- Programs/Elementary-Education-M-S
Program Summary Department: Teacher Education Report Preparer: Dr. Aram Ayalon and Dr. Barbara Clark Program Name and Level: Graduate Elementary Education Program Assessment Question 1) URL: Provide the
More informationAPSU Teacher Unit Annual Program Review (APR) Report 2013 2014. Curriculum and Instructor: Instructional Technology
1 APSU Teacher Unit Annual Program Review (APR) Report 2013 2014 Curriculum and Instructor: Instructional Technology I. Name of Program: Curriculum and Instruction: Instructional Technology II. Reviewers:
More informationBest Practices for Online Courses. 100 Quality Indicators for Online Course Design
Best Practices for Online Courses 100 Quality Indicators for Online Course Design The following criteria are meant to act as guidelines for the course development process. Some of these guidelines would
More informationDegree/Certificate Program Assessment Report College of Arts and Sciences The University of New Mexico. Part I: Cover Page
Degree/Certificate Program Assessment Report College of Arts and Sciences The University of New Mexico Part I: Cover Page Name of Degree or Certificate Program English (Rhetoric and Writing emphasis) BA
More informationAnnual Assessment Report 2013 Department of Design
Annual Assessment Report 2013 Department of Design The Department of Design, within the College of Arts and Letters, offers a Bachelor of Arts in Photography and Interior Design, and a Bachelor of Science
More informationLEARNING, DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY CAPSTONE PROJECT GUIDELINES
LEARNING, DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY CAPSTONE PROJECT GUIDELINES For CUIN LDT Master s Students PURPOSE OF THE LDT CAPSTONE PROJECT As part of the program requirements for the Learning, Design & Technology
More informationRevisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University
Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University A. A description of how the proposed program has been revisioned to reflect
More informationCOLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND LEADERSHIP 6801 N. Yates Road, Milwaukee Wisconsin, 53217
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND LEADERSHIP 6801 N. Yates Road, Milwaukee Wisconsin, 53217 Department of Instructional Technology School of Education/College of Education and Leadership #92 Instructional Technology
More informationHow To Integrate And Implement Web 2.0 Tools And Blogging In The Classroom
Felicia A. Belcher January 2014 Dr. Sherri Booker Summer 2012 Integrating and Implementing Web 2.0 Tools and Blogging in the Classroom CAPSTONE PROPOSAL Master s Degree in Instructional Technology Candidate
More informationThe History of St. Joseph Classroom Technology
With each passing year, the traditional classroom is in the process of implementing The History of St. Joseph Classroom Technology a new and exciting way to teach students. The new technology of today
More informationAnnual Report on Degree Program Assessment of Student Learning - Art Education
Annual Report on Degree Program Assessment of Student Learning University Assessment Committee Office of Academic Assessment Professional Education Unit Steering Committee Purpose: The purpose of the Annual
More informationAttachment A UW-Stout Cooperative Education Students Qualitative Data from 2007-2008
Attachment A UW-Stout Cooperative Education Students Qualitative Data from 2007-2008 All of the Cooperative Education students complete an evaluation of their Cooperative Education experience when they
More informationTeacher Performance Evaluation System TPES
Teacher Performance Evaluation System TPES The Code of Virginia 22.1253.13.5 states, in part, the following: B. Consistent with the finding that leadership is essential for the advancement of public education
More informationGEORGIA STANDARDS FOR THE APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNITS AND EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS
GEORGIA STANDARDS FOR THE APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNITS AND EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS (Effective 9/01/08) Kelly Henson Executive Secretary Table of Contents Standard 1: Candidate Knowledge,
More informationThe University of Southern Mississippi. Detailed Assessment Report 2010-2011 Instructional Technology MS**
The University of Southern Mississippi Detailed Assessment Report 2010-2011 Instructional Technology MS** Mission/Purpose The Master of Science of Instructional Technology is a systematic graduate-level
More informationList all of the program s learning outcomes: (regardless of whether or not they are being assessed this year)
STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT SUBMITTED BY: BRIDGET MURPHY DATE: SEPTEMBER 27, 2013 BRIEFLY DESCRIBE WHERE AND HOW ARE DATA AND DOCUMENTS USED TO GENERATE THIS REPORT BEING STORED: The majority of
More informationProgram Outcomes for B.S. in Secondary Education
Bachelors of Science: Secondary Education 5/10/07 1 Program Outcomes for B.S. in Secondary Education The successful undergraduate candidate in the 7-12 bachelors program is able to plan, teach, assess,
More informationUse of Instructional Technology as an Integral Part of a Non-Major Science Laboratory Course: A New Design. Phyllis Laine Xavier University.
The Journal of Interactive Online Learning Volume 1, Number 4, Spring 2003 www.ncolr.org ISSN: 1541-4914 Use of Instructional Technology as an Integral Part of a Non-Major Science Laboratory Course: A
More informationA Standards-Based Technology Integration Path at Towson University
Wizer, D., & Ryan, P. (2004). A Standards-based technology integration path at Towson University. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(1), 73-80. A Standards-Based Technology Integration
More informationSelf-Reflection Teaching. Susan M. Blunck, Ph.D. Assistant Clinical Professor Department of Education UMBC
Self-Reflection Teaching Susan M. Blunck, Ph.D. Assistant Clinical Professor Department of Education UMBC 2 Self Reflection Teaching Effective teaching is not about what we give or do to our students.
More informationEXAMPLE FIELD EXPERIENCE PLANNING TEMPLATE CCSU MAT Program
EXAMPLE FIELD EXPERIENCE PLANNING TEMPLATE CCSU MAT Program Secondary Education (Math, History/Social Studies, Science, World Languages) and Special Education (K-12) Goal: The MAT program focuses on preparing
More informationCriteria for Evaluating Hybrid and Online Courses
Criteria for Evaluating Hybrid and Online Courses In this document, hybrid refers to any course that replaces face-to-face contact hours with online instruction and online refers to courses that have no
More informationElectronic Portfolios in Evolution
Electronic Portfolios in Evolution Roger Olsen rlo@email.byu.edu Nancy Wentworth Nancy_Wentworth@byu.edu David Dimond dimo112@alpine.k12.ut.us Abstract: Electronic Portfolios in Evolution describes a dynamic
More informationOnline Course Self-Assessment Form
Online courses are approved by the University of California in two steps: Online Course Self-Assessment Form 1. Assessment against International Association for K-12 Online Learning (inacol) course standards.
More information2013 Political Science Department PAPR
2013 Political Science Department PAPR The Political Science Department offers a variety of courses designed to prepare students for transfer to four-year colleges and universities and provide training
More informationSummary of Feedback Results Number of faculty who participated in the Digital Learning Summer Institute = 20
Summary of Feedback Results Number of faculty who participated in the Digital Learning Summer Institute = 20 Workshop Topics by Facilitators Feedback Results from Faculty Participants June 3 rd 2014 Workshop:
More informationHow To Get A Wgu Degree
Master of Science, Curriculum and Instruction The Master of Science degree in Curriculum and Instruction is a competency-based program and represents a path for K-12 educators and corporate trainers wishing
More informationElementary and Middle School Technology Curriculum Guidelines
Elementary and Middle School Technology Curriculum Guidelines Catholic Schools Office Diocese of Erie March, 2007 PHILOSOPHY STATEMENT... 1 TECHNOLOGY CURRICULUM FOUNDATION... 1 TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION STANDARDS
More informationThe University of Southern Mississippi. Detailed Assessment Report As of: 10/07/2013 01:17 PM EST 2012-2013 Instructional Technology MS
The University of Southern Mississippi Detailed Assessment Report As of: 10/07/2013 01:17 PM EST 2012-2013 Instructional Technology MS Mission / Purpose The Master of Science of Instructional Technology
More informationNORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL AND TECHNICAL STATE UNIVERSITY
NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL AND TECHNICAL STATE UNIVERSITY Built Environment Construction Management Robert B. Pyle, Department Chair 2013-2014 Common program outcomes and student learning outcomes for
More informationSC Cyber Academy. South Carolina Public Charter School District
South Carolina Public Charter School District SC Cyber Academy School Mission: The educational mission of Cyber Academy of South Carolina (CASC) is to provide an individualized standards-based education
More informationUniversity Mission School Mission Department Mission Degree Program Mission
Degree Program Student Learning Report (rev. 7/14) Fall 2013 Spring 2014 The Department of Applied Technology in the School of Business & Technology Business Information Technology, B.S. Effectively assessing
More informationGeorge Mason University Graduate School of Education Special Education Program
George Mason University Graduate School of Education Special Education Program EDSE 517: Computer Applications for Special Populations Course Syllabus Fall 2011 Instructor: Jeff Sisk Section #658: 4:30
More informationMark J. Quathamer Brevard Community College Quality Enhancement Plan White Paper
Running Head: BCC MATH SUCCESS Preparing for math success: Brevard Community College preparatory math courses Mark J. Quathamer Brevard Community College Quality Enhancement Plan White Paper Running Head:
More information2012-2013 Assessment Report School of Nursing Nursing, MSN. Expected Outcome 1 Title Professional Role Development
2012-2013 Assessment Report School of Nursing Nursing, MSN Expected Outcome 1 Title Professional Role Development Full description of Expected Outcome: AU/AUMSON MSN students will be able to articulate
More informationConverting a Face-to-Face Course to a Hybrid Course
Converting a Face-to-Face Course to a Hybrid Course A research paper by Stephanie Delaney For College Teaching EDAD 966 Introduction Hybrid courses blend the best of face-to-face classes with online learning.
More informationBS Environmental Science (2013-2014)
BS Environmental Science (2013-2014) Program Information Point of Contact Brian M. Morgan (brian.morgan@marshall.edu) Support for University and College Missions Marshall University is a multi-campus public
More informationEducational Technology Department Updated Course Descriptions. July 1, 2015
Educational Technology Department Updated Course Descriptions July 1, 2015 EDTC 612 Technology in the Math/ Science Curriculum (3) This course focuses on the use of math/ science technology to find new
More informationSupport and Process for Developing Online and Blended Courses
CONTINUING AND DISTANCE STUDIES FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCE www.queensu.ca/artsci_online Support and Process for Developing Online and Blended Courses A. Introduction to Continuing and Distance Studies......
More informationThat s why we focus so much time and effort on the development of our digital curriculum.
APEX LEARNING Overview Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention, sincere effort, intelligent direction, and skillful execution; it represents the wise choice of many alternatives.
More informationInstructional Design and Technology Professional Core Courses Instructional Design and Technology Core Courses & Descriptions
Search Home Instructional Design and Technology Professional Core Courses Instructional Design and Technology Core Courses & Descriptions Note: The degree is usually completed entirely online, unless other
More informationPublic Administration, B.A.
f ce.in the SchooLof LiberalArt Public Administration, B.A. Effectively assessing a degree program should address a number of factors: ---------"Lj-Valid_studenLieaming cutcomes shouidbe clearl'i articulated;
More informationNew Mexico 3-Tiered Licensure System
New Mexico 3-Tiered Licensure System Requirements & Guidelines for the Preparation of the New Mexico Professional Development Dossier (PDD) for Teachers Prepared by the New Mexico Public Education Department
More informationHow To Teach Authentic Learning
Alignment of Standard I: Teachers Demonstrate Leadership A. Teachers lead in their classrooms. Take responsibility for all students learning Week 1: Multimedia Book: Authentic Learning in the Digital Age
More information1. Introduction Graduate School, Teaching and Learning Certificate. 1.1 Unit Mission Statement
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY PROGRAM ASSESSMENT PLAN Graduate School, Certificate in College Teaching and Learning Submitted by Linda Kraus Worley and Morris Grubbs, Co-directors 1. Introduction Graduate School,
More informationColorado Professional Teaching Standards
Colorado Professional Teaching Standards Standard I: Teachers demonstrate knowledge of the content they teach a. Teachers provide instruction that is aligned with the Colorado Academic Standards and their
More informationWest Ranch High School Mission Statement
WEST RANCH HIGH SCHOOL Web Development 1 & 2 Mr. Casey Burrill Web Development Instructor E-mail: cburrill@hartdistrict.org www.wrwebheads.com (661) 222-1220, ext. 513 West Ranch High School Mission Statement
More informationMALONE UNIVERSITY ASSESSMENT ANNUAL REPORT CARD. Counseling and Human Development Counselor Education
Program Name: Counselor Education Assessed by: Dr. Susan Steiner Director, Department of Counseling and Human Development Date/Cycle of Assessment: Reporting cycle of Summer 2013 through Summer 2014 Mission
More informationFall 2014: Graphic Design
Fall 2014: Graphic Design Graphic design is a large and growing profession in demand in the global communications world. In addition to an emphasis on traditional skills and production methods, the program
More informationOglala Lakota College Teacher Preparation Program Instructional Unit Scoring Rubric
Oglala Lakota College Teacher Preparation Program Instructional Unit Scoring Rubric Student: Course: Date: Instructor: Center: Semester: Directions: Mark the descriptor that best describes candidate performance
More informationActivities (see attached Appendix G) Page 71 of 100
for I. TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS AND CONCEPTS A. Demonstrate introductory knowledge, skills and understanding of concepts related to technology 1. Identify CPU, monitor, mouse, printer, projection device See
More informationFrequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions Educational Psychology 1. What is Educational Psychology? 2. How do I choose the EDPS track that s right for me? 3. Is Educational Psychology the same thing as School Psychology
More informationThe specific objectives of the MMIS program are as follows:
Department of Management, Marketing, and Information Systems (MMIS) 1. Mission and Objectives: The objectives of the program since the last review were to enhance the MMIS programs. The mission and objectives
More informationCEHD ipad Initiative YEAR TWO REPORT FALL 2011 SPRING 2012. Treden Wagoner, M.A.Ed. Anne Schwalbe Sheila Hoover, Ph.D. David Ernst, Ph.D.
CEHD ipad Initiative YEAR TWO REPORT FALL 2011 SPRING 2012 Treden Wagoner, M.A.Ed. Anne Schwalbe Sheila Hoover, Ph.D. David Ernst, Ph.D. 2 Mobile Learning learning within various contexts and locations
More informationB. Public School Partners Involvement in the Revisioning of the Program and Continued Involvement in the Delivery and Evaluation of the Program
Re-Visioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina MA in History, Secondary Education with Licensure in History and Social Studies Appalachian State University A. Description of how the Proposed
More informationSeward County Community College/Area Tech School Program - Social Sciences
Assessment Impact by Assessment Methods Direct Seward County Community College/Area Tech School Program - Social Sciences Program - Social Sciences A pre-test and post-test will be given to students. Outcome:
More informationNATIONAL CURRICULUM STATEMENT GRADES 10-12 SUBJECT: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
NATIONAL CURRICULUM STATEMENT GRADES 10-12 SUBJECT: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TEACHER TRAINING MANUAL 2006 PROGRAMME 3 SESSION 1 Introducing the National Curriculum Statement (NCS) and the National Senior
More informationDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Sciences
Department of Mathematics and Computer Sciences DEGREES Learning Technologies (MS) Instructional Design and Technology (MS) CERTIFICATES Learning Technologies Virtual Worlds in Education Instructional
More informationLeadership Development
Leadership Development Leadership Development The ultimate test of a firm s leadership strength comes from its overall capacity to produce leadership that delivers stakeholder confidence in future results.
More informationI. Students succeed because teachers plan with individual learning results in mind.
A. Students understand daily, weekly and unit learning goals and objectives. 1. The teacher designs and shares daily learning objectives for student reference. 2. Instructional strategies and learning
More informationMJC Online Course Review Process DRAFT
MJC Online Course Review Process DRAFT Online courses have on average 10% lower student success across all disciplines. To enhance the teaching and learning experience and help promote student success,
More informationIntro/Abstract. Where are we now?
Intro/Abstract Where are we now? In 2008, Cañada s Technology Advisory Committee was formed. Their mission included a goal to utilize technology to improve teaching and learning, enhance accessibility,
More informationHow To Pass A Queens College Course
Education Unit Assessment Analysis Guide...committed to promoting equity, excellence, and ethics in urban schools and communities 1 Unit Assessment Analysis Guide Introduction Form 1: Education Unit Core
More informationCourse Title: Technology, Leadership and Innovation Board Approval Date: January 19, 2015 Credit / Hours:.5 credit
Course Title: Technology, Leadership and Innovation Board Approval Date: January 19, 2015 Credit / Hours:.5 credit Course Description: Technology Leadership and Innovation is a course designed for students
More informationUnit Number Unit Name Person Responsible 012120 Business Management and Supervision (MST) Wanda Markie Hunter
Unit Number Unit Name Person Responsible 012120 Business Management and Supervision (MST) Wanda Markie Hunter : 1 Operational To improve the accessibility of business courses, the Business Department will
More informationThe New Student Experience
Valencia College Quality Enhancement Plan: The New Student Experience Fall 2014 Report Prepared by Dr. Christina Hardin Director, New Student Experience Initial Goals and Intended Outcomes Valencia s New
More informationElectrical Engineering Technology(BS) and Computer Engineering Technology Assessment Plan
BSEET-EET and BSCET-CET Electrical Engineering Technology(BS) and Computer Engineering Technology Assessment Plan The UC EET and CET Academic Quality plan described in this document identifies the process
More informationCERTIFICATE OF TEACHING AND LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION
The University of Hong Kong Centre for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning CERTIFICATE OF TEACHING AND LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION Course Outline (2013 2014) Overview The course aims to provide the
More informationParalegal Studies Assessment Report 2005-2006. Introduction
Paralegal Studies Assessment Report 2005-2006 Introduction The Paralegal Studies program volunteered to use the elumen Achievement System to assess student learning for the 2005-2006 academic year. We
More informationSan Diego City San Diego City College Applied Math Project (AMP) IMPACT ON SYSTEMWIDE NEED SPECIFIC EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM BEING ADDRESSED
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES Depository of Funded Projects 1994 PROPOSAL NARRATIVES 94-1020 San Diego City San Diego City College Applied Math Project (AMP) CONTENTS BACKGROUND / INTRODUCTION IMPACT ON
More informationCreating Online Courses A Collaborative Design Process that Works
Creating Online Courses A Collaborative Design Process that Works Online Courses Don t Simply Happen In recent years, the phrase online learning has taken a prominent seat whenever education reform is
More informationidea COUNT Apple Professional Development Workshop for Educators Partnership with Presents
idea COUNT in Partnership with Presents Apple Professional Development Workshop for Educators idea COUNT Who are we? idea COUNT is the dedicated team of educators from Power Mac Center that teaches Apple
More informationa. A brief description of the assessment, its use in the program, and how the assessment is aligned to standards
National Education Technology Standards for Teachers (NETS*Teachers) Undergraduates enrolled in ETC 447 Fall 2011 Fall 2014 (1) Alignment & Data Findings a. A brief description of the assessment, its use
More informationBSEVE-ENVE Environmental Engineering Assessment Plan 2013-2017 Approved May, 2013
BSEVE-ENVE Environmental Engineering Assessment Plan 2013-2017 Approved May, 2013 University Mission The University of Cincinnati (UC) serves the people of Ohio, the nation, and the world as a premier,
More informationOnline Course Development Guide and Review Rubric
Online Course Development Guide and Review Rubric Thank you for participating in our online course review process! Your input is extremely valuable to us, and we appreciate the time you are taking to help
More information12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 1
12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 1 Getting Started 1.1 Instructions make clear how to get started and where to find various course components. 1.2 Students are introduced to the purpose
More informationRegistration. If you are interested in registering for this unique opportunity please contact:
Registration If you are interested in registering for this unique opportunity please contact: Sandy Barton Fremont County BOCES 201 East Washington Riverton, WY 82501 Phone - 307.856.2082 Fax - 307.856.4058
More informationTo ensure students achieve success, educators must take an
Online Teacher Resource and Assessment Community Product Training and Professional Development Introduction To ensure students achieve success, educators must take an active role in their continuous learning,
More information2015 TEACHER Program Curriculum Template Guide
2015 TEACHER Program Curriculum Template Guide The purpose of this curriculum template is to help you think through how you will make the STARTALK principles come alive in your program while you implement
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY. List all of the program s learning outcomes: (regardless of whether or not they are being assessed this year)
STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT SUBMITTED BY: BRIDGET MURPHY DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 2015 BRIEFLY DESCRIBE WHERE AND HOW ARE DATA AND DOCUMENTS USED TO GENERATE THIS REPORT BEING STORED: The majority of student
More informationInformation Technology Series Information Technology Consultant 1
Classification and Qualification STANDARDS The California State University System Information Technology Series Information Technology Consultant CLASSIFICATION OVERVIEW Positions in this classification
More informationEXCEPTIONAL NEEDS SPECIALIST
IMPORTANT NOTICE TO CANDIDATES: The assessment information in this document is aligned with NBPTS Exceptional Needs Standards, Second Edition (for teachers of students ages birth 21+). If you applied for
More informationinitiative, an initiative designed to:
Research and Evaluation of the Maine Learning Technology Initiative (MLTI) Laptop Program Impacts on Student Achievement Dr. David L. Silvernail Director of Research Maine International Center for Digital
More informationThe National Educational Technology Standards. (Upon which our local standards are based)
The National Educational Standards (Upon which our local standards are based) Students demonstrate a sound understanding of the nature and operation of technology systems. Students are proficient in the
More informationNETOP VISION CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE. Using Vision in mobile labs and BYOD environments
NETOP VISION CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE Using Vision in mobile labs and BYOD environments CHANGE IS INEVITABLE Classrooms around the world are evolving and changing. Schools are looking for ways to
More informationProject-Based Cartographic Learning in an Advanced Technology Classroom. Brian P. Bailey
Project-Based Cartographic Learning in an Advanced Technology Classroom Brian P. Bailey Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering United States Military Academy West Point, NY 10996 Tel: 845-938-4620
More informationPHYSICAL EDUCATION. Assessment at a Glance. Early and Middle Childhood. Choosing the Right Certificate. Reviewing the Standards
Early and Middle Childhood PHYSICAL EDUCATION Choosing the Right Certificate Reviewing the Standards Demonstrating Your Teaching Practice and Content Knowledge Understanding the National Board Scoring
More informationAnnual Report 2014 SJSU Faculty Survey Summary on Instructional Technology
Annual Report Prepared by: San José State University Information Technology Services and Academic Technology Departments 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 3 Faculty Demographics... 4 Faculty Positions...
More informationPerformance and Development - Classroom teacher- Graduate - Date of next salary increase (where applicable):
Performance and Development - Classroom teacher- Graduate - PERSONAL DETAILS Name: Emily Bloggs Record Number: 0238328 Current range and subdivision: G2 Date of next salary increase (where applicable):
More informationA Guide to Curriculum Development: Purposes, Practices, Procedures
A Guide to Curriculum Development: Purposes, Practices, Procedures The purpose of this guide is to provide some general instructions to school districts as staff begin to develop or revise their curriculum
More informationeportfolio Requirements for IT Master s Program
eportfolio Requirements for IT Master s Program The graphic at the left is a good visual representation of the components that make a good instructional technology eportfolio. Helen Barrett who has done
More informationCTL Online Workshop Program Referral Resource Sheet
ACADEMIC POLICIES THAT CAN AFFECT YOU AS A UMUC FACULTY MEMBER Familiarizes faculty with UMUC Academic Policies and their effect on faculty responsibilities and expectations for students Intended for all
More informationCURRENT INNOVATION For the past 8 years, I have taught 5 th grade. During this time I have seen a huge spectrum of student talents, abilities and
1 2 CURRENT INNOVATION For the past 8 years, I have taught 5 th grade. During this time I have seen a huge spectrum of student talents, abilities and learning styles in any given classroom. Textbooks are
More informationLANG 557 Capstone Paper . Purpose: Format: Content: introduction view of language
Masters of Science in Curriculum & Instruction Special Education Emphasis Alignment of Summative Assessments to InTASC Standards The Courses in the TESL Emphasis are aligned to MN Board of Teaching Standards
More informationChapter 3 - Alternative Assessments
Chapter 3 - Alternative Assessments Evaluating with Alternative Assessments In the ERIC Digest article "Alternative Assessment and Second Language Study: What and Why?" Charles R. Hancock states "In the
More informationAssurance of Learning Assessment Process
Assurance of Learning Assessment Process (AACSB Assurance of Learning Standards: An Interpretation, Accessed 12/01/2011, )
More informationProgram Outcomes and Assessment
Program Outcomes and Assessment BS Child Development Program Outcomes October 2013 Creative and Critical Thinkers Program Outcomes Courses Courses Standard 1. Understanding and Applying Developmental Knowledge
More informationConstruction Industry Institute (CII) Best Practices Course for Construction Management Programs
Construction Industry Institute (CII) Best Practices Course for Construction Management Programs Mehmet E. Ozbek, Ph.D. Andrew Fillion Santosh Prakash Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO The Construction
More information