SOIL MECHANICS. Exam #1: Soil Composition, Soil Classification, Soil Compaction, Hydraulic Conductivity, and Soil Stresses.
|
|
|
- Piers Little
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Geotechnical Engineering Research Laboratory One University Avenue Lowell, Massachusetts Edward L. Hajduk, D.Eng, PE Lecturer PA105D Tel: (978) Fax: (978) e mail: [email protected] web site: DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SOIL MECHANICS Exam #1: Soil Composition, Soil Classification, Soil Compaction, Hydraulic Conductivity, and Soil Stresses. Questions (2 Points Each - 20 Points Total): 1. You are given the following results from Atterberg Limits testing on a soil sample (w p = 23%, w L = 50%) collected from a boring on a local project site. What is the plasticity index for this soil? If the soil is fine grained, what is the USCS Group Symbol for this soil? PI = LL PL, therefore = 27. Soil is CH (see ASTM Figure 1 on Page 10) 2. The soil sample from Question #1 had natural moisture content of 56.3% prior to Atterberg Limits testing. What does the natural moisture content result tell you about the soil in-situ (i.e. in place )? That the soil has a natural moisture content beyond the LL. The soil will act as a liquid. 3. Write the equation that relates velocity of water thru soils to hydraulic gradient and detail the variables of this equation. v = ki Discharge Velocity = (Coefficient of Permeability)(Hydraulic Gradient) 4. What is the relationship between moist unit weight and dry unit weight? Write the relevant equation and describe the variables. γ γ d 1 w d = Dry Unit Weight, = Moist Unit Weight, w = Water Content
2 5. Write the effective stress equation and detail the variables. = u (Effective Stress = Total Stress Pore Pressure) 6. Your firm s lab manager tells you that the maximum dry density for the soil to be used for fill on your project is lbs/ft 3 at an OMC of 11% according to ASTM D698. At the site, you find that that first lift of fill placed has a moist unit weight of lbs/ft 3 at a w n of 12.1%. What is the percent compaction for the first lift? Is this percent compaction even possible? γ γ d,field = (118.3 lbs/ft 3 /( )) = lbs/ft 3 d 1 w R (%) = (105.5 lbs/ft 3 /105.2 lbs/ft 3 ) * 100 = 100.3%. Yes. 7. Write the equation that relates saturation to specific gravity of soils and describe the variables. Se = wg s (Saturation)(Void Ratio) = (Water Content)(Specific Gravity) 8. You are given a soil sample that has 10% gravel, 20% sand, and 70% silt/clay size particles (i.e. particles passing the #200 sieve). What compaction equipment would you recommend to a contractor that has to place 2ft of this soil to build up a building pad? Why? 70% Fines = Fine Grained Soil. Use Sheepsfoot, since it is better for fine grained soils. 9. For the USCS Soil Classification System, what does the acronym USCS stand for? Unified Soil Classification System - USCS 10. Describe effective stress in your own words. The stress the soil sees Exam 1 Solution Page 2 of 14
3 Problems: (1 20 points, 2 20 points, 3 20 points, 4 20 points) NOTICE: You must detail your answers (i.e. show your work) for these four problems for full credit. You may use additional paper provided at the front desk if needed. Make sure you reference the problem number if you use an additional blank page(s). 1. You are a field engineer for a construction services testing firm. Your current job assignment is to evaluate fill placement for a new roadway being constructed in Tewksbury, MA. The project specifications for the roadway require fill compaction to 98% of the ASTM D1557 compaction test results. Your lab manager sends you the results of Standard and Modified Proctor compaction testing on the fill being placed. These results are presented in Figure A. Your field compaction test results for the second soil lift taken at the intervals required by the project specifications are listed in Table A. Figure A. Proctor Compaction Testing Results Exam 1 Solution Page 3 of 14
4 Table A. Field Density Testing Results for Soil Lift #2. STA w (%) (pcf) d,field (pcf) RC (%) PASS/FAIL Fail Fail From the provided information, determine the following: - The compaction characteristics for the ASTM D698 test. Table A1. Laboratory Compaction Testing Results (See Figure A). Test Method d,max (pcf) OMC (%) Modified (D1557) If the fill meets the compaction requirements at the two field density test locations. STEPS: 1. Determine d,max and OMC for D1557 test results (see Figure A and Table A1). 2. Convert field testing results to d,field using d equation. d, field Calculate % Field Compaction =R = d,max 4. Compare % Field Compaction to required Field Compaction from project specification (i.e. 98%). Calculation results presented in Table A. 1 w - If the field test(s) do not meet the project specifications, what remedial actions would you recommend to the contractor? Dry soils at both Stations and recompact Exam 1 Solution Page 4 of 14
5 2. You are given the results of index testing (i.e. ASTM D422 and D4318) of two soil samples collected during a recent geotechnical exploration. The index test results are presented in Figure B. The first sample was taken between depths of 1.5 ft to 2.5 ft below the existing ground surface. The second sample was taken between depths of 6.5 ft to 7.5 ft below the existing ground surface. The groundwater table, at the time of the geotechnical exploration, was at a depth of 4.0 ft from the existing ground surface. Classify the soils in accordance with USCS (give group symbol and group name). Relevant portions of ASTM D2487 are attached to the end of this exam. Sample #1: 1.5 to 2.5 ft Depth. From Figure B. % Gravel = 10% % Sand = 81% Coarse Grained Soil (>50% Retained on #200 Sieve) % Fines = 9% Fines are CL (see Casagrande Chart on Sheet 6). D mm Coefficient of Uniformity = C u = C u D 0.085mm Coefficient of Curvature (i.e. Gradation) = C c = ( D ) ( D xd (0.395mm)2 ) (0.82mm)(0.085mm) Determine USCS Classification from Figure 3, ASTM D Exam 1 Solution Page 5 of 14
6 10% Gravel 81% Sand C u = 9.64, C c = 2.23 Fines are CL 9% Fines 10% Gravel Figure 3. ASTM D2487. Casagrande Chart for Soil Classification (with Sample #1 and #2 Results Plotted) Exam 1 Solution Page 6 of 14
7 Sample #2: 6.5 to 7.5 ft Depth. From Figure A. % Gravel = 0% % Sand = 45% Fine Grained Soil ( 50% Passing #200 Sieve) % Fines = 55% PI = LL PL = = 20; PI = 20, LL = 70. Soil is MH from Figure 4, ASTM D2487 (See above Casagrande Chart) LL = 70 0% Gravel 45% plus #200 SUMMARY: Sample Depth (ft) USCS Symbol USCS Group Name SW-SC Well Graded Sand with Clay (or Silty Clay) MH Sandy Elastic Silt Exam 1 Solution Page 7 of 14
8 Figure B. Grain Size Distributions and Atterberg Limits for Problem # Exam 1 Solution Page 8 of 14
9 3. You have been given the results of a recent geotechnical exploration for a local project in Chelmsford, MA. The groundwater table at the time of exploration was 4 ft from the existing ground surface. This is also the interface between the SC and CL soil layers. Figure C provides the soil profile at the time of geotechnical exploration. From the provided information, calculate total stress, pore pressure, and effective stress with depth and plot them on the provided graphs. You must label numbers on the graphs for full credit. SOLUTION: Figure C. Soil Profile for Problem 3. Calculate total, pore pressure, and effective stresses with depth at the following points shown in Figure C: Point A: Bottom of SC Layer and GWT location (4ft below existing ground surface) Point B: Middle of CL layer (not needed for this exam, but will be helpful later) Point C: Bottom of CL Layer (10 ft below existing ground surface) Point D: Bottom of Given Soil Profile (20 ft below existing ground surface) Exam 1 Solution Page 9 of 14
10 Point A: Use moist unit weight for SC: sc = 115 pcf. A = sc (4ft) = (115 pcf)(4ft) = 460 psf u A = 0 (Above GWT) A = ' A since u A = 0 psf Point B: B = A + SAT,CL (3ft) = 460 psf + (120 pcf)(3ft) = 820 psf U B = w (3ft) = (62.4 pcf)(3ft) = 187 psf ' B = B u B = 820 psf 187 psf = 633 psf = 635 psf (rounded) Point C: C = B + SAT,CL (3ft) = 820 psf + (120 pcf)(3ft) = 1180 psf U C = w (6ft) = (62.4 pcf)(6ft) = 374 psf ' C = C u C = 1180 psf 374 psf = 806 psf = 805 psf (rounded) Point D: D = C + SAT,SM (10ft) = 1180 psf + (118pcf)(10ft) = 2360 psf u D = w (16ft) = (62.4 pcf)(16ft) = 998 psf ' D = D u D = 2360 psf 998 psf = 1360 psf (rounded) Exam 1 Solution Page 10 of 14
11 4. You are given the flow net for the gravity dam shown in Figure D. A piezometer (i.e. standpipe) is installed at Point A. The following are some dimensions of the flow net: Dam Length: 175 ft. H = 25 ft H 1 = 35 ft The depth of Point A below the dam is 16 ft. How much would the water in the piezometer drop below the water level on the left side of the dam? How much would the water level in the piezometer rise relative to the water level on the right side of the dam? What is the pore pressure at Point A? Left Side Right Side A From Figure D: Figure D. Flow Net underneath a Gravity Dam (Note Figure is NTS: Not To Scale). Change in Head from Left Side of Dam to Right Side of Dam = H = 25 ft Exam 1 Solution Page 11 of 14
12 Number of Drops (N d ) = 8 Therefore, Change in Head per drop = H/8 = 3.125ft/drop Number of drops from back side to Point A = 6.5. Therefore, water in a piezometer at Point A would drop 6.5H/8 (20.3ft) from the water level on the Left Side of the Dam. Conversely, the water level would rise 1.5H/8 (4.7ft) from the water level on the Right Side of the Dam. Pore Pressure = Water Pressure = (Height of Water)(Unit Weight of Water) Level of Water above bottom of dam = H 1 6.5H/8 = 35 ft 6.5(25)/8 = ft. Height of water above Point A = ft + 16 ft = ft. Pore Pressure = (30.69)(62.4 lb/ft 3 ) = 1915 psf. EXTRA CREDIT: (5 points) Name three methods for determining change in vertical stresses within a soil mass due to foundation loading. Briefly explain which method you would use and why. Boussinesq (Both column and strip. Conservative. No soil layers) Westergaard (Both column and strip. Less conservative. Factors in layers) 2V:1H Approximation Method (Middle of rectangular footing only. Back of the envelope, quick calculation) Exam 1 Solution Page 12 of 14
13 HELPFUL INFORMATION? Exam 1 Solution Page 13 of 14
14 D Cu D C c (D30) (D xd ) q k H N d Exam 1 Solution Page 14 of 14
14.330 SOIL MECHANICS Assignment #4: Soil Permeability.
Geotechnical Engineering Research Laboratory One University Avenue Lowell, Massachusetts 01854 Edward L. Hajduk, D.Eng, PE Lecturer PA105D Tel: (978) 94 2621 Fax: (978) 94 052 e mail: [email protected]
LABORATORY CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES
Test Procedure for LABORATORY CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES TxDOT Designation: Tex-142-E Effective Date: August 1999 1. SCOPE 1.1 This method is a system for classifying disturbed and
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FORMULAS. A handy reference for use in geotechnical analysis and design
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FORMULAS A handy reference for use in geotechnical analysis and design TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. SOIL CLASSIFICATION...3 1.1 USCS: Unified Soil Classification System...3 1.1.1
CONSTANT HEAD AND FALLING HEAD PERMEABILITY TEST
CONSTANT HEAD AND FALLING HEAD PERMEABILITY TEST 1 Permeability is a measure of the ease in which water can flow through a soil volume. It is one of the most important geotechnical parameters. However,
PHYSICAL AND PLASTICITY CHARACTERISTICS
0 PHYSICAL AND PLASTICITY CHARACTERISTICS EXPERIMENTS #1-5 CE 3143 October 7, 2003 Group A David Bennett 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Experiment # 1: Determination of Water Content (August 26, 2003) pp. 1-3
NOTE: FOR PROJECTS REQUIRING CONTRACTOR MIX DESIGN, THE DESIGN PROCEDURES ARE SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT.
September 1, 2003 CONCRETE MANUAL 5-694.300 MIX DESIGN 5-694.300 NOTE: FOR PROJECTS REQUIRING CONTRACTOR MIX DESIGN, THE DESIGN PROCEDURES ARE SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT. 5-694.301
The University of Toledo Soil Mechanics Laboratory
1 Grain Size Distribution Sieve Analysis The University of Toledo Soil Mechanics Laboratory Introduction The grain size distribution is a representation of the approximate distribution of soil grain sizes
HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT GUIDANCE NOTES ON SOIL TEST FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN
HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT GUIDANCE NOTES ON SOIL TEST FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN Research & Development Division RD/GN/012 August 1990 HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT GUIDANCE NOTES (RD/GN/012) SOIL TEST FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN Prepared
Soil Mechanics. Soil Mechanics
Soil is the most misunderstood term in the field. The problem arises in the reasons for which different groups or professions study soils. Soil scientists are interested in soils as a medium for plant
ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design
This image cannot currently be displayed. ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design Shallow Foundations Total and Differential Settlement Schmertmann s Method This image cannot currently be displayed. Strength
Geotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur
Geotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur Lecture No. # 28 Last lecture we have covered this Atterberg limit,
SOIL COMPACTION BASICS
SOIL COMPACTION BASICS Figure courtesy of : A Basic Handbook by MultiQuip. : Densification of soil by the removal of air. Courtesy of http://www.extension.umn.edu Slide 1 of 38 WHY COMPACT SOILS? Figure
Geotechnical Characteristics of Two Different Soils and their Mixture and Relationships between Parameters
Geotechnical Characteristics of Two Different Soils and their Mixture and Relationships between Parameters Arpan Laskar Post Graduate Student Civil Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology
The University of Toledo Soil Mechanics Laboratory
The University of Toledo Soil Mechanics Laboratory Permeability Testing - 1 Constant and Falling Head Tests Introduction In 1856 the French engineer Henri D arcy demonstrated by experiment that it is possible
Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) 1
Designation: D 2487 06 Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) 1 This standard is issued under the fixed designation D 2487; the number
TECHNICAL Summary. TRB Subject Code:62-7 Soil Foundation Subgrades February 2003 Publication No.: FHWA/IN/JTRP-2002/30, SPR-2362
INDOT Research TECHNICAL Summary Technology Transfer and Project Implementation Information TRB Subject Code:62-7 Soil Foundation Subgrades February 3 Publication No.: FHWA/IN/JTRP-2/3, SPR-2362 Final
Specification Guidelines: Allan Block Modular Retaining Wall Systems
Specification Guidelines: Allan Block Modular Retaining Wall Systems The following specifications provide Allan Block Corporation's typical requirements and recommendations. At the engineer of record's
Period #16: Soil Compressibility and Consolidation (II)
Period #16: Soil Compressibility and Consolidation (II) A. Review and Motivation (1) Review: In most soils, changes in total volume are associated with reductions in void volume. The volume change of the
EXPERIMENT 10 CONSTANT HEAD METHOD
EXPERIMENT 10 PERMEABILITY (HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY) TEST CONSTANT HEAD METHOD 106 Purpose: The purpose of this test is to determine the permeability (hydraulic conductivity) of a sandy soil by the constant
GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE
GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE Prof. J. N. Mandal Department of civil engineering, IIT Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India. Tel.022-25767328 email: [email protected] Module - 4
Math Matters: Dissecting Hydrometer Calculations
Math Matters: Dissecting Hydrometer Calculations By Jonathan Sirianni, Laboratory Assessor In the 16th century Galileo and the Tower of Pisa made famous the fact that two objects, no matter their mass,
Apr 17, 2000 LAB MANUAL 1302.0. 1302 PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS OF SOILS AASHTO Designation T 88 (Mn/DOT Modified)
Apr 17, 2000 LAB MANUAL 1302.0 1302 PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS OF SOILS AASHTO Designation T 88 (Mn/DOT Modified) 1302.1 SCOPE This method describes a procedure for the quantitative determination of the distribution
CHAPTER: 6 FLOW OF WATER THROUGH SOILS
CHAPTER: 6 FLOW OF WATER THROUGH SOILS CONTENTS: Introduction, hydraulic head and water flow, Darcy s equation, laboratory determination of coefficient of permeability, field determination of coefficient
In-situ Density Determination by Sand Replacement Method
University of Texas at Arlington Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory Test Procedure In-situ Density Determination by Sand Replacement Method Lecture Note 7 (Thursday 03-04-04) 1 Definitions, Objectives
CONCRETE SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL SYSTEM
CONCRETE SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL SYSTEM PART 1: GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS 1.01 Work Included A. Work shall consist of furnishing and constructing a Rockwood Classic 8 with PCS unit segmental retaining wall
FUNDAMENTALS OF CONSOLIDATION
FUNDAMENTALS OF CONSOLIDATION SAND (Vertical Stress Increase) CLAY CONSOLIDATION: Volume change in saturated soils caused by the expulsion of pore water from loading. Saturated Soils: causes u to increase
Appendix D.1. Testing Requirements for Infiltration, Bioretention and Sand Filter Subsoils
Appendix D.1 Testing Requirements for Infiltration, Bioretention and Sand Filter Subsoils General Notes Pertinent to All Testing 1. For infiltration trench (I-1) and basin (I-2) practices, a minimum field
Determination of Thermal Conductivity of Coarse and Fine Sand Soils
Proceedings World Geothermal Congress Bali, Indonesia, - April Determination of Thermal Conductivity of Coarse and Fine Sand Soils Indra Noer Hamdhan 1 and Barry G. Clarke 2 1 Bandung National of Institute
SOIL-LIME TESTING. Test Procedure for. TxDOT Designation: Tex-121-E 1. SCOPE 2. APPARATUS 3. MATERIALS TXDOT DESIGNATION: TEX-121-E
Test Procedure for SOIL-LIME TESTING TxDOT Designation: Tex-121-E Effective Date: August 2002 1. SCOPE 1.1 This method consists of three parts. 1.1.1 Part I determines the unconfined compressive strength
Evaluation of Properties of Soil Subgrade Using Dynamic Cone Penetration Index A Case Study
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development e-issn: 2278-067X, p-issn: 2278-800X Volume 4, Issue 4 (October 202), PP. 07-5 Evaluation of Properties of Soil Subgrade Using Dynamic Cone
Ohio Department of Transportation Division of Production Management Office of Geotechnical Engineering. Geotechnical Bulletin PLAN SUBGRADES
Ohio Department of Transportation Division of Production Management Office of Geotechnical Engineering Geotechnical Bulletin GB 1 PLAN SUBGRADES Geotechnical Bulletin GB1 was jointly developed by the Offices
SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised 11/5/13)
Page 1 of 7 STONE STRONG SYSTEMS SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised ) PART 1: GENERAL 1.01 Description A. Work includes furnishing and installing precast modular blocks
PART 3 DEFINITION OF ROCKFILL VERSUS EARTHFILL MATERIAL
PART 3 DEFINITION OF ROCKFILL VERSUS EARTHFILL MATERIAL Allan J. Breitenbach, P.E. AB Engineering Inc. Littleton, Colorado, USA Telephone: 1/720-981-5244 Telefax: 1/720-981-5245 Email: [email protected]
CONCRETE SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL SYSTEM
CONCRETE SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL SYSTEM PART 1: GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS 1.01 Work Included A. Work shall consist of furnishing and constructing a Rockwood Vintage TM unit segmental retaining wall (SRW)
Geotechnical Investigation Test Report
Geotechnical Investigation Test Report Report No. htsc/rcd/ 3457 Dated: - 20/03/2010 Asphalt Standard Penetration Test as per IS 2131 ------------- IS 6403 Soil Job Card No - 1649 Cement Client/Department
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 3, No 3, 2013
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 3, No 3, 2013 Copyright by the authors - Licensee IPA- Under Creative Commons license 3.0 Research article ISSN 0976 4399 Reliability of
SIENA STONE GRAVITY RETAINING WALL INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS. Prepared by Risi Stone Systems Used by permission.
SIENA STONE GRAVITY RETAINING WALL INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS Prepared by Risi Stone Systems Used by permission. 1-800-UNILOCK www.unilock.com FOREWORD This outline specification has been prepared for
PART TWO GEOSYNTHETIC SOIL REINFORCEMENT. Martin Street Improvements, Fredonia, Wisconsin; Keystone Compac Hewnstone
GEOSYNTHETIC SOIL REINFORCEMENT Martin Street Improvements, Fredonia, Wisconsin; Keystone Compac Hewnstone DESIGN MANUAL & KEYWALL OPERATING GUIDE GEOSYNTHETIC SOIL REINFORCEMENT Keystone retaining walls
METHOD OF TEST FOR DETERMINATION OF PERMEABILITY OF GRANULAR SOILS
Laboratory Testing Manual Date: 99 06 21 Page 1 of 7 METHOD OF TEST FOR DETERMINATION OF PERMEABILITY OF GRANULAR SOILS 1. SCOPE 1.1 This method covers the determination of the coefficient of permeability
FINAL REPORT ON SOIL INVESTIGATION
FINAL REPORT ON SOIL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AT SS-6B AREA AT HPCL VISAKH REFINERY VISAKHAPATNAM ANDHRA PRADESH J.J. ASSOCIATES(VISAKHAPATNAM) AETP(P) LIMITED #11-6-3, RockDale Layout,
The Verdura Wall check with your local building department
The Verdura Wall The Verdura Wall by Soil Retention Products, Inc of Carlsbad, California can be constructed as a gravity retaining structure or a geosynthetic reinforced segmental retaining wall, depending
Effect of grain size, gradation and relative density on shear strength and dynamic cone penetration index of Mahi, Sabarmati and Vatrak Sand
Discovery ANALYSIS The International Daily journal ISSN 2278 5469 EISSN 2278 5450 2015 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved Effect of grain size, gradation and relative density on shear strength
APPENDIX F GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
The City of Winnipeg Bid Opportunity No. 101-2016 Template Version: C420150806 - RW APPENDIX F GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AECOM 99 Commerce Drive 204 477 5381 tel Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3P 0Y7 204 284 2040 fax
SECTION 3.3 - PAVEMENT DESIGN
SECTION 3.3-3.3.1 GENERAL 3.3.2 SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE 3.3.3 DETERMINATION OF DESIGN TRAFFIC 3.3.4 SUBGRADE EVALUATION 3.3.5 PAVEMENT THICKNESS 3.3.5.1 GRANULAR PAVEMENTS WITH THIN BITUMINOUS SURFACING 3.3.5.2
Numerical Analysis of Texas Cone Penetration Test
International Journal of Applied Science and Technology Vol. 2 No. 3; March 2012 Numerical Analysis of Texas Cone Penetration Test Nutan Palla Project Engineer, Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc. 10710 S Sam
Work Type Definition and Submittal Requirements
Work Type: Highway Materials Testing Geotechnical Laboratory Testing, Geotechnical Laboratory Testing, Standard Penetration (SPT) & Rock Coring, Cone Penetration Test, Solid Stem Auger Drilling, and Materials
Soil behaviour type from the CPT: an update
Soil behaviour type from the CPT: an update P.K. Robertson Gregg Drilling & Testing Inc., Signal Hill, California, USA ABSTRACT: An initial application of CPT results is to evaluate soil type and soil
Estimation of Compression Properties of Clayey Soils Salt Lake Valley, Utah
Estimation of Compression Properties of Clayey Soils Salt Lake Valley, Utah Report Prepared for the Utah Department of Transportation Research Division by Steven F. Bartlett, PhD. P.E. Assistant Professor
APPENDIX G SETTLEMENT
APPENDIX G SETTLEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS G.1 IN T R O D U C T IO N... 1 G.2 MATERIAL PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION... 1 G.2.1 Incom pressible M aterials... 1 G.2.2 Compressible Materials... 2 G.2.3 Soil P lacem
20 ACRE UBATC SITE ( 650' x 1,350') UINTAH BASIN MASTER PLAN VERNAL CAMPUS. Architects Engineers Program and Construction Managers 10.18.
20 ACRE UBATC SITE ( 650' x 1,350') UINTAH BASIN MASTER PLAN VERNAL CAMPUS Architects Engineers Program and Construction Managers 10.18.06 BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING TRADES CLASSROOMS COMMONS/CIRCULATION
METHOD A7 THE DETERMINATION OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT OF GRAVEL, SOIL AND SAND
SCOPE METHOD A7 THE DETERMINATION OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT OF GRAVEL, SOIL AND SAND Definition The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content, as defined below, is
CHAPTER 2 AGGREGATE TECHNICIAN TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION PROGRAM
Topic No. 700-000-001 Construction Training and Qualification Manual Effective: July 1, 2002 Aggregate Technician Training and Qualification Program Revised: DRAFT May 6September 3, 2008 CHAPTER 2 AGGREGATE
Embankment Consolidation
Embankment Consolidation 36-1 Embankment Consolidation In this tutorial, RS2 is used for a coupled analysis of a road embankment subject to loading from typical daily traffic. Model Start the RS2 9.0 Model
MANUAL OF PROCEDURES FOR CONSTRUCTION VOLUME I JANUARY 1998. An Equal Opportunity Employer
MANUAL OF PROCEDURES FOR E A R T H W O R K CONSTRUCTION VOLUME I JANUARY 1998 An Equal Opportunity Employer VOLUME I FOREWORD The purpose of this manual is to provide construction personnel with information
c. Borehole Shear Test (BST): BST is performed according to the instructions published by Handy Geotechnical Instruments, Inc.
Design Manual Chapter 6 - Geotechnical 6B - Subsurface Exploration Program 6B-2 Testing A. General Information Several testing methods can be used to measure soil engineering properties. The advantages,
Frequently Asked Questions on the Alberta Tier 1 and Tier 2 Soil and Groundwater Remediation Guidelines. February 2008
Frequently Asked Questions on the Alberta Tier 1 and Tier 2 Soil and Groundwater Remediation Guidelines February 2008 Frequently Asked Questions on the Alberta Tier 1 and Tier 2 Soil and Groundwater Remediation
Civil. 2. City of Seattle Supplement to the Specification for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction, most current addition.
Design Guide Basis of Design This section applies to the design and installation of earthwork and backfill. Design Criteria No stockpiling of excavation materials is allowed unless the Geotechnical Engineer
PART I SIEVE ANALYSIS OF MATERIAL RETAINED ON THE 425 M (NO. 40) SIEVE
Test Procedure for PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS OF SOILS TxDOT Designation: Tex-110-E Effective Date: August 1999 1. SCOPE 1.1 This method covers the quantitative determination of the distribution of particle
APPLICATION FOR GRAYWATER IRRIGATION SYSTEM PERMIT SIMPLE RESIDENTIAL GRAVITY SYSTEMS, NO STORAGE
APPLICATION FOR GRAYWATER IRRIGATION SYSTEM PERMIT SIMPLE RESIDENTIAL GRAVITY SYSTEMS, NO STORAGE Please read the California Plumbing Code Chapter 16A-1 Design Requirements before completing this form.
Relationship between the percentage of clay with liquid limit, plastic limit and plastic index in four different soils texture class
Technical Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences Available online at www.tjeas.com 2013 TJEAS Journal-2013-3-8/697-702 ISSN 2051-0853 2013 TJEAS Relationship between the percentage of clay with liquid
SECTION 31 20 00 EARTH MOVING
SECTION 31 20 00 PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 DESCRIPTION A. This Section describes the requirements for excavating, filling, and grading for earthwork at Parking Structure, new exit stair and as required to
PE Exam Review - Geotechnical
PE Exam Reiew - Geotechnical Demonstration Problem Solutions I. Soled Problems... 1. Soil Classification.... Phase Relationships... 6 3. Effectie Stress and Stress Distribution... 100 4. Consolidation...
The University of Toledo Soil Mechanics Laboratory
The University of Toledo Soil Mechanics Laboratory 1 Soil Moisture-Density Relationship Standard and Modified Proctor Tests Introduction For earthork construction it is important to compact soils to a
KWANG SING ENGINEERING PTE LTD
KWANG SING ENGINEERING PTE LTD 1. INTRODUCTION This report represents the soil investigation works at Aljunied Road / Geylang East Central. The objective of the soil investigation is to obtain soil parameters
Assoc. Prof. Derin N. URAL. 2/16/2009 Mechanics of Soils 1
Mechanics of Soils Assoc. Prof. Derin N. URAL 2/16/2009 Mechanics of Soils 1 Lecture 1 SECION 1 Soil Formation Particle Size Distribution Soil Classification SECION 2 Soil Composition 3-phase material
A LABORATORY STUDY ON EFFECT OF TEST CONDITIONS ON SUBGRADE STRENGTH
A LABORATORY STUDY ON EFFECT OF TEST CONDITIONS ON SUBGRADE STRENGTH A REPORT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Bachelor of Technology In Civil Engineering By: Rajesh
STANDARD INSPECTION & TEST PLAN (ITP) FOR CIVIL WORKS :
CONSTRUCTION OF BG RAILAY SIDING AT KADAPA IRD (ITP) F CIVIL KS : 1.0 GENERAL NOTES: Inspection & Test Plan (ITP) given herein is indicative only. Contractor shall prepare and submit ITP for all activities.
Lecture 17 Design of Earthen Canals. I. General
Lecture 17 Design of Earthen Canals I. General Much of this information applies in general to both earthen and lined canals Attempt to balance cuts and fills to avoid waste material and or the need for
DIRECT SHEAR TEST SOIL MECHANICS SOIL MECHANICS LABORATORY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF MORATUWA SRI LANKA
DIRECT SHEAR TEST SOIL MECHANICS SOIL MECHANICS LABORATORY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF MORATUWA SRI LANKA DIRECT SHEAR TEST OBJEVTIVES To determine the shear strength parameters for a
Module 1 : Site Exploration and Geotechnical Investigation. Lecture 5 : Geophysical Exploration [ Section 5.1 : Methods of Geophysical Exploration ]
Objectives In this section you will learn the following General Overview Different methods of geophysical explorations Electrical resistivity method Seismic refraction method 5 Geophysical exploration
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CEMENT-BENTONITE SLURRY TRENCH CUTOFF WALL
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CEMENT-BENTONITE SLURRY TRENCH CUTOFF WALL SCOPE This section of the specifications includes requirements for the Slurry Trench Cutoff Wall and related work as indicated on the
For Water to Move a driving force is needed
RECALL FIRST CLASS: Q K Head Difference Area Distance between Heads Q 0.01 cm 0.19 m 6cm 0.75cm 1 liter 86400sec 1.17 liter ~ 1 liter sec 0.63 m 1000cm 3 day day day constant head 0.4 m 0.1 m FINE SAND
HYDRAULIC STRUCTURES, EQUIPMENT AND WATER DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEMS Vol. IV - Testing of Materials and Soils - F. Druyts
TESTING OF MATERIALS AND SOILS F. Druyts Pr. Eng., Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria, South Africa Keywords: Materials testing, soil mechanics/properties, construction materials, earth
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION CITY OF HOUSTON SURFACE WATER TRANSMISSION PROGRAM CONTRACT 74A-1 WATERLINE COH WBS NO. S-000900-0109-3 HOUSTON, TEXAS
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION CITY OF HOUSTON SURFACE WATER TRANSMISSION PROGRAM CONTRACT 74A-1 WATERLINE COH WBS NO. S-000900-0109-3 HOUSTON, TEXAS Reported To: LAN, Inc. Houston, Texas by Aviles Engineering
Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical design - Part 2 Ground investigation and testing
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 1 Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical design - Part 2 Ground investigation and testing Dr.-Ing. Bernd Schuppener, Federal Waterways Engineering
Chapter 4 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION GUIDELINES
Chapter 4 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION GUIDELINES Final SCDOT GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN MANUAL August 2008 Table of Contents Section Page 4.1 Introduction...4-1 4.2 Subsurface Investigation...4-2 4.2.1 Preliminary
load on the soil. For this article s examples, load bearing values given by the following table will be assumed.
How Many Piers? By Gary Collins, P.E. A clear-cut guide to helical pier spacing Introduction Helical pier spacing is not an exact science. How many does it take to support a structure adequately or repair
ENGINEERED FOUNDATIONS. Department of Public Works Jeff Hill, PE
ENGINEERED FOUNDATIONS Department of Public Works Jeff Hill, PE What is an engineered foundation. A Foundation Design Developed by a Trained Professional (Engineer) Types of Foundations (All of which can
VERTICAL STRESS INCREASES IN SOIL TYPES OF LOADING. Point Loads (P) Line Loads (q/unit length) Examples: - Posts. Examples: - Railroad track
VERTICAL STRESS INCREASES IN SOIL Point Loads (P) TYPES OF LOADING Line Loads (q/unit length) Revised 0/015 Figure 6.11. Das FGE (005). Examples: - Posts Figure 6.1. Das FGE (005). Examples: - Railroad
Drained and Undrained Conditions. Undrained and Drained Shear Strength
Drained and Undrained Conditions Undrained and Drained Shear Strength Lecture No. October, 00 Drained condition occurs when there is no change in pore water pressure due to external loading. In a drained
Area No. 8 Test Pit No. 191
Area No. 8 Test Pit No. 191 Area Sierra-Yoyo-Desan Road Excavator Cat 322 B Photographs Location 43 m @ 40 degrees from TP-189 Northing 6571912 Date 03 March 2003 R4-7 Easting 0568784 Weather -17 C, Snow
CW 3110 SUB-GRADE, SUB-BASE AND BASE COURSE CONSTRUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS
December 2014 CW 3110 SUB-GRADE, SUB-BASE AND BASE COURSE CONSTRUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. DESCRIPTION... 1 1.1 General... 1 1.2 Definitions... 1 1.3 Referenced Standard Construction Specifications...
Module 7 (Lecture 24 to 28) RETAINING WALLS
Module 7 (Lecture 24 to 28) RETAINING WALLS Topics 24.1 INTRODUCTION 24.2 GRAVITY AND CANTILEVER WALLS 24.3 PROPORTIONING RETAINING WALLS 24.4 APPLICATION OF LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE THEORIES TO DESIGN 24.5
Soil Classification Through Penetration Tests
Pak. J. Engg. & Appl. Sci. Vol. 9, Jul., 2011 (p. 76-86) Soil Classification Through Penetration Tests A. H. Khan, A. Akbar, K. Farooq, N. M. Khan, M. Aziz and H. Mujtaba Department of Civil Engineering,
Trench Rescue by Buddy Martinette
Trench Rescue by Buddy Martinette SOIL TYPE AND TESTING It is imperative that rescue personnel understand soil types and testing procedures if the want to be competent at trench rescue operations. Determining
GRADATION OF AGGREGATE FOR CONCRETE BLOCK
GRADATION OF AGGREGATE FOR CONCRETE BLOCK Although numerous papers have been written concerning the proper gradation for concrete mixes, they have generally dealt with plastic mixes, and very little published
product manual HS-4210 HS-4210_MAN_09.08 Digital Static Cone Penetrometer
HS-4210_MAN_09.08 product manual HS-4210 Digital Static Cone Penetrometer Introduction This Manual covers the measurement of bearing capacity using the Humboldt Digital Static Cone Penetrometer (DSCP).
ANNEX D1 BASIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR REVIEWING STUDIES IN THE DETAILED RISK ASSESSMENT FOR SAFETY
ANNEX D1 BASIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR REVIEWING STUDIES IN THE DETAILED RISK ASSESSMENT FOR SAFETY ANNEX D1: BASIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR REVIEWING STUDIES IN DRA FOR SAFETY D1-1 ANNEX D1 BASIC CONSIDERATIONS
SNC-Lavalin Inc. Montcalm Wastewater Pumping Station Upgrades - Geotechnical Report. October 2011
SNC-Lavalin Inc. Montcalm Wastewater Pumping Station Upgrades - Geotechnical Report October 2011 SNC-Lavalin Inc Montcalm Wastewater Pumping Station Upgrades - Geotechnical Report Table of Contents 1.0
How To Define Tss
Demonstration of the Effect of Particle Size on Design & Performance of Stormwater Quality Systems nd National Low Impact Development Conference, March 1-14, 7 Scott Perry Stormwater Specialist Imbrium
Method Statement FOR. Soil Investigation
Method Statement FOR Soil Investigation PREPARED BY JUNE 2010 Infratech ASTM CO., LTD. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Title Page Table of Contents..1 List of Appendix... 2 List of Table... 2 List of Figures...
Experiment 3 Pipe Friction
EML 316L Experiment 3 Pipe Friction Laboratory Manual Mechanical and Materials Engineering Department College of Engineering FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Nomenclature Symbol Description Unit A cross-sectional
Soil Testing Soil index properties 24. Cone Penetrometer Method BS 1377, 1924-2, EN DD ENV 1997-2. Semi-Automatic Cone Penetrometer
24 Soil index properties Soil Index Properties Soil index properties are used extensively by engineers to discriminate between the different kinds of soil within a broad category, e.g. clay will exhibit
Best Management Practices for Coal Ash Storage Facilities
2009 World of Coal Ash (WOCA) Conference - May 4-7, 2009 in Lexington, KY, USA http://www.flyash.info/ Best Management Practices for Coal Ash Storage Facilities Presented by: Christopher D. Hardin, PE
Gasketed PVC Sewer Pipe Durable, Flexible, Reliable Waterworks Products
Gasketed PVC Sewer Pipe Durable, Flexible, Reliable Waterworks Products www.pwpipe.com PWPipe Sewer Pipe Tough, Dependable, and Leak-free. Here s why: Figure 1. PWPipe Gasket Insertion line Bell is an
LABORATORY DETERMINATION OF CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO
LABORATORY DETERMINATION OF CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO STANDARD IS: 2720 (Part 16) 1979. DEFINITION California bearing ratio is the ratio of force per unit area required to penetrate in to a soil mass with
GUIDELINES FOR SOIL FILTER MEDIA IN BIORETENTION SYSTEMS (Version 2.01) March 2008
GUIDELINES FOR SOIL FILTER MEDIA IN BIORETENTION SYSTEMS (Version 2.01) March 2008 The following guidelines for soil filter media in bioretention systems have been prepared on behalf of the Facility for
GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN MANUAL
GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN MANUAL CHAPTER 6 ENGINEERING PROPERTIES OF SOIL AND ROCK NYSDOT Geotechnical Page 6-1 June 17, 2013 (Intentionally left blank) NYSDOT Geotechnical Page 6-2 June 17, 2013 Table of Contents
GEOTECH ENGINEERING and TESTING
GEOTECH ENGINEERING and TESTING Geotechnical, Environmental, Construction Materials, and Forensic Engineering ACCREDITED GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS FOR A TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE
