DECLARATION OF CONFORMITY

Transcription

1 DECLARATION OF CONFORMITY Manufacturer's Name: LINK YAPI VE TESİSAT MALZEMELERİ SANAYİ VE TİCARET LTD.ŞTİ. Manufacturer's Address: (GOSB) Gebze Organize Sanayi Bölgesi Sokak No: Çayırova / Kocaeli / Türkiye T: F : info@linkyapi.com.tr Product Description: Noise and Vibration Control Products Applicable EU Directive: COUNCIL DIRECTIVE on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to construction products (89/106/EEC) Applicable Harmonized Standard: EN :1992 I, the undersigned, hereby declare that the equipment specified above conforms to the above Directive(s) and Standard(s). Signature: Printed Name: _E. Tümay KÖSE Title: _General Coordinator_

2 DECLARATION OF CONFORMITY Manufacturer's Name: LINK YAPI VE TESİSAT MALZEMELERİ SANAYİ VE TİCARET LTD.ŞTİ. Manufacturer's Address: (GOSB) Gebze Organize Sanayi Bölgesi Sokak No: Çayırova / Kocaeli / Türkiye T: F : info@linkyapi.com.tr Product Description: Pipe Hanger and Support Systems Applicable EU Directive: COUNCIL DIRECTIVE on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to construction products (89/106/EEC) Applicable Harmonized Standard: EN 545:2006 I, the undersigned, hereby declare that the equipment specified above conforms to the above Directive(s) and Standard(s). Signature: Printed Name: _E. Tümay KÖSE Title: _General Coordinator_

3 DECLARATION OF CONFORMITY Manufacturer's Name: LINK YAPI VE TESİSAT MALZEMELERİ SANAYİ VE TİCARET LTD.ŞTİ. Manufacturer's Address: (GOSB) Gebze Organize Sanayi Bölgesi Sokak No: Çayırova / Kocaeli / Türkiye T: F : info@linkyapi.com.tr Product Description: Air Duct Connection Elements Applicable EU Directive: COUNCIL DIRECTIVE on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to construction products (89/106/EEC) Applicable Harmonized Standard: EN 12236:2002 ; EN 1505:1997 I, the undersigned, hereby declare that the equipment specified above conforms to the above Directive(s) and Standard(s). Signature: Printed Name: _E. Tümay KÖSE Title: _General Coordinator_

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37 PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT Seismic Drift ( Static and Dynamic ) Oktay Usta Testing Manager M.Serhat Çolak Testing Engineer

38 TEST REPORT Report Number : / 2012 Report Date : Testing Reference : AAMA Recommended Static Test Method for Evulating Curtain Wall and Storefront Systems Subjected to Seismic and Wind Induced Interstory Drifts AAMA Recommended Dynamic Test Method for Determining the Seismic Drift Causing Glass Fallout from a Wall System Product : PLS 50/30 ( Anchorage Channel ) PLV 54/33 ( M12x60 ) ( T Bolts ) PLS 52/34 ( Anchorage Channel ) PLV 54/33 ( M12x60 ) ( T Bolts ) Client : Link Yapı ve Tesisat Malzemeleri San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti. F REV NO: A OCAK 2012 Page : 1/6

39 1. PREFACE This report comprises of tests and results, which were performed by FTI Facade Testing Institute at the address; Çakıl Village -Baglar Region, PK Çatalca - Istanbul/ TURKIYE. Test sample comprises of a part of concrete systems have been designed which names are PLS 50/30 (Anchorage Channel ) PLV 54/33 ( M12x60 ) ( T Bolts ) and PLS 52/34 ( Anchorage Channel ) PLV 54/33 ( M12x60 ) ( T Bolts ) by Link Yapı ve Tesisat Malzemeleri San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti. Tests were carried out in October 2012 for the determination of the Static and Dynamic test method for seismic drift. Test sample has been sent to FTI Façade Testing Institute s testing laboratories on CLIENT Link Yapı ve Tesisat Malzemeleri San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti. Fahri Korutürk Cad. Metal Sk. No: 5 Kartal / İstanbul / TÜRKİYE 3. TEST METHODS The above mentioned tests have been carried out as per the test methods provided in project specifications and classified on the standards indicated below. Tests have been reported as the number of / AAMA * Recommended Static Test Method for Evulating Curtain Wall and Storefront Systems Subjected to Seismic and Wind Induced Interstory Drifts AAMA * Recommended Dyanmic Test Method for Determining the Seismic Drift Causing Glass Fallout from a Wall System 4. TEST DATE AND PARTICIPANTS Tests were performed on with the following participants: Mr. Oktay USTA FTI Laboratory Manager Mr. M. Serhat ÇOLAK FTI Testing Engineer Mr. Öner ARSLAN FTI Testing Engineer and partially by Gürsel AKYEL Alper BEKTAŞ Yılmaz BAŞARAN Link Yapı ve Tesisat Malzemeleri San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti Link Yapı ve Tesisat Malzemeleri San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti Link Yapı ve Tesisat Malzemeleri San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti F REV NO: A OCAK 2012 Page : 2/6

40 5. DESCRIPTION OF TEST SAMPLE * Type of Sample Concrete System ( Include anchorage channel and T bolt ) * System Name - * Dimensions of Sample (LxH) 2800 mm x 1500 mm 2800 mm x 2150 mm * Surface area of Sample 4,2 m 2 / 6,02 m 2 * Fixed Joint Length 8,6 m / 9,9 m * Number of Openable part(s) None * Opening Type None * Dimensions of window(s) - mm x mm * Surface Area of Openable Parts - m 2 * Opening Joint Lenght - m * Glass Type - System Components * Concrete * PLS 50 / 30 * PLS 52 / 34 * PLV 54 / 33 Anchorage Channel Anchorage Channel T Bolt ( M12x60 ) Please refer to the drawings in annexes. 6. CONDITIONS Local Temperature : 23 ºC Atmospheric Pressure : 1010 Mbar Ambient Humidity : 47 % Test Stand : 6 7. TEST PERFORMANCE 7.1. Seismic Test Two differences size samples were used at this test. Samples have different height. Same test procedure was applied on two samples. 1. Sample: 2800 ( Wide ) x 1500 ( Height ) x 400 ( Depth ) mm 2. Sample: 2800 ( Wide ) x 2150 ( Height ) x 400 ( Depth ) mm You can find test and sample detail as below: F REV NO: A OCAK 2012 Page : 3/6

41 1. Sample PLS 50/30 ( Anchorage Channels ) PLV 54/33 ( M12x60 ) ( T Bolts ) were used for this test. Test was started static seismic drift. Nuts, which are used for fixing T bolt, were tighten by means of torque meter. Bottom nuts were tighten with 80 Nm. Top nut was tighten with 100 Nm. Concrete block is 3948 kg.you can see sample picture, anchorage channel place and T bolt in Figure 1. Figure 1. Simulated Concrete block, Anchorage Channel and T Bolt Force was applied top T Bolt which was fixed to the movable steel beam of the test stand. Test shall consist of three full cycles. A cycle is defined as a full displacement in one drection, back to the originating point, full displacement in the opposite direction, and back to the originating point. * Anchorages were moved up to + 8,7 mm for 3 times. There was no damage or fracture observed in anchorage channel, T bolt and on the sample at the end of the test. ( / ) Movable steel beam were moved at horizontal direction: * Firstly, Steel beam was moved between 0 to + 75 mm in 0,8 Hz ( totally 150 mm ) * Subsequently, Steel beam was moved between + 75 mm to mm in 0,4 Hz ( totally 300 mm ) There was no damage or fracture observed in anchorage channel, T bolt and on the sample at the end of the test. ( / ) Graph of the corresponding test is in annex. F REV NO: A OCAK 2012 Page : 4/6

42 2. Sample PLS 52/34 ( Anchorage Channels ) PLV 54/33 ( M12x60 ) ( T Bolts ) were used for this test. Test was started static seismic drift. Nuts, which are used for fixing T bolt, were tighten by means of torque meter. Bottom nuts were tighten with 80 Nm. Top nut was tighten with 100 Nm. Concrete block is 5663 kg. You can see sample picture, anchorage channel place and T bolt in Figure 2. Figure 2. Simulated Concrete block, Anchorage Channel and T Bolt Force was applied top T Bolt which was fixed to the movable steel beam of the test stand. Test shall consist of three full cycles. A cycle is defined as a full displacement in one drection, back to the originating point, full displacement in the opposite direction, and back to the originating point. * Anchorages were moved up to + 8,7 mm for 3 times. There was no damage or fracture observed in anchorage channel, T bolt and on the sample at the end of the test. ( / ) Movable steel beam were moved at horizontal direction: * Firstly, Steel beam was moved between 0 to + 75 mm in 0,8 Hz ( totally 150 mm ) * Subsequently, Steel beam was moved between + 75 mm to mm in 0,4 Hz ( totally 300 mm ) There was no damage or fracture observed in anchorage channel, T bolt and on the sample at the end of the test. ( / ) Graph of the corresponding test is in annex. F REV NO: A OCAK 2012 Page : 5/6

43 8. REVISIONS MADE ACCORDING TO TEST RESULTS No revision was made. 9. RESULTS CONDITIONS PROCESS RESULTS CLASSIFICATION SEISMIC TEST AAMA ( 1. Sample ) There should not be any remain damage or brekage + 8,7 mm ( 3 cycles ) No damage was observed OK SEISMIC TEST AAMA ( 1. Sample ) There should not be any remain damage or brekage 0 to + 75 mm in 0,8 Hz + 75 mm to mm in 0,4 Hz No damage was observed No damage was observed OK OK SEISMIC TEST AAMA ( 2. Sample ) There should not be any remain damage or brekage + 8,7 mm ( 3 cycles ) No damage was observed OK SEISMIC TEST AAMA ( 2. Sample ) There should not be any remain damage or brekage 0 to + 75 mm in 0,8 Hz + 75 mm to mm in 0,4 Hz No damage was observed No damage was observed OK OK F REV NO: A OCAK 2012 Page : 6/6

44