TITLE Quiet City Transport Subproject 5 Noise propagation & receiver perception Work Package
|
|
|
- Dustin Logan
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 TIP4-CT Page 1 of 48 DELIVERABLE D CONTRACT N TIP4-CT PROJECT N FP ACRONYM QCITY TITLE Quiet City Transport Subproject 5 Noise propagation & receiver perception Work Package 5.2 CDM rubber low height prototype barrier for trams and trains Measurements at Athens Tram network Depot. Written by Prof. Constantinos VOGIATZIS TT&E Date of issue of this report PROJECT CO-ORDINATOR Acoustic Control ACL SE PARTNERS Accon ACC DE Akron AKR BE Alfa Products & Technologies APT BE Banverket BAN SE Composite Damping Material CDM BE Havenbedrijf Oostende HOOS BE Frateur de Pourcq FDP BE Goodyear GOOD LU Head Acoustics HAC SE Heijmans Infra HEIJ BE Royal Institute of Technology KTH SE Vlaamse Vervoersmaatschappij DE LIJN LIJN BE Lucchini Sidermeccanica LUC IT NCC Roads NCC SE Stockholm Environmental & Health Administration SEA SE Société des Transports Intercommunaux de Bruxelles STIB BE Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO NL Trafikkontoret Göteborg TRAF SE Tram SA TRAM GR TT&E Consultants TTE GR University of Cambridge UCAM UK University of Thessaly UTH GR Voestalpine Schienen VAS AU Zbloc Norden ZBN SE Union of European Railway Industries UNIFE BE PROJECT START DATE February 1, 2005 DURATION 48 months Project funded by the European Community under the SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME PRIORITY 6 Sustainable development, global change & ecosystems
2 TIP4-CT Page 2 of 48 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction CDM s Noise barrier test sites & Instrumentation.4 3. Field measurements results 2006 at Athens Tram Depot Hellinikon Greece Discussion and concluding remarks...20 Annexes ANNEX 1 ANNEX 3 CDM s rubber low height platform barrier noise measurement results per pass by/speed with & without barrier Technical specifications of CDM s rubber barrier
3 TIP4-CT Page 3 of INTRODUCTION Athens Tram has performed during last years an extended Noise &Vibration Study including both airborne & ground borne noise & vibration levels calculations. This N&V study suggested the implementation of various anti noise/vibration mitigation measures. The originally performed calculations within this study for the design of the Tram networks suggested that in some urban areas the use of adequate noise barriers in order to achieve both improvement of the acoustic environment and aesthetic integration of the relevant construction to the urban environment. TTE has conducted the above study on improvement of the urban acoustic environment that revealed of a transparent barrier of a max. height of approx. 1,5 meters, in a suitable distance from the external rail of the tramway, could decrease dramatically the equivalent sound levels (depending also to tram type & relevant noise emissions) for the majority of nearby residents even though the relevant noise criterion in Greece was set to 67 db(a) for the index Leq (18hours) based on the total daily operation of the system. This highly aesthetical medium height transparent barrier was then ordered and installed on October 2005 in a site area with dense urban characteristics in the front side at Glyfada Athens (Diadohou Pavlou str.). Furthermore within Qcity project Acoustic Control & Zblock suggested also to test a prototype low platform barrier of a limited height of some 32cm suitable for installation near platforms in the network. Zblock has produced the relevant prototype that was arrived in Athens end 2005 and Installed by Tram S.A. in a test site in Tram Depot at Hellinikon Athens. Both prototypes barriers were then tested and measured within Qcity s relevant subproject SP4 and the relevant results were already presented in the relevant deliverable 4.3 Additionally to the above deliverable findings - in the framework of WP5.2 - TTE has also conducted a relevant measurement campaign in order to evaluate also the insertion loss of a prototype rubber low height CDM noise barrier in Athens Tram depot for both setups WITH & WITHOUT noise barrier, with the goal to evaluate the overall noise attenuation in the view of reducing further down the noise index from tramway operation in European urban areas. The present report describes the setup of the relevant additional measurement campaign, the relevant results and the relevant concluding remarks & recommendations.
4 TIP4-CT Page 4 of CDM NOISE BARRIER TEST SITE & INSTRUMENTATION In this chapter the tested rubber barrier type & test site evaluated in the measurement campaign is described in detail. As presented before an approx m length, low height (approx 45 cm) absorbing rubber noise barrier from CDM in a min. distance of approx. 4 to 12cm from the Tram gabarit (according to Athens Tram relevant dimensioning in platform area respectively at upper edge & base of barrier) This prototype low barrier was installed in Athens Tram Depot in order to evaluate the relevant insertion loss at various speed conditions (from 10 up to 40 Km/h). The same vehicle was used during all measurements as per the Zblock barrier measurements presented in D4.3. As per D4.3 two distinct measurement scenario were executed involving measurements WITH & WITHOUT the barrier according to the EN ISO 3095:2005(E) and the provisions of the recent 2002/49/CE directive introducing a height for noise recording purposes of H = 4 m (+/- 0.2). The measured campaign was designed especially to obtain reproducible and comparable measurement results of levels and spectra of noise emitted by tramway vehicles operating on rails or fixed track. The Standard EN ISO 3095:2005 has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 256 Railway applications, the secretariat of which is held by DIN, in collaboration with Technical Committee ISO/TC 43 "Acoustics". This standard is applicable for type testing & periodic monitoring testing and the results may be used,: to characterize the noise emitted by these trains; to compare the noise emission of various vehicles on a particular track section; to collect basic source data for trains. According to the standard and in view of the particularities of the Athens Tram depot test site the noise quantities suggested to be measured at all microphone positions are : For whole trams moving at constant speed the Transit Exposure Level, TEL, or the A-Weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure level on the pass by time, LpAeq. The measurement quantity for accelerating or braking tests the maximum AFweighted sound pressure LpAFmax. For the present campaign a frequency analysis was also required, made at least in one third octave bands according to EN ISO 266: at least from 31,5 Hz to 8 khz. ensuring that the lower frequency limit is chosen to ensure that the product of the lowest bandwidth and signal duration exceeds unity. For this campaign a frequency range from 20 Hz to 20 KHz was introduced.
5 TIP4-CT Page 5 of 48 The instrumentation system, including the microphones, cables and recording devices was in accordance with the requirements for a type 1 instrument specified in EN Both 01dB s Harmonie & Symphonie noise recording and 1/3 octave band analysis systems from 01dB (FR) were used ensuring two sets of : 4 synchronized micros & 2 synchronized micros (for add. locations in Tram depot site all with suitable windscreens The microphones have an essentially flat frequency response in a free sound field. The 1/3 octave band filters met the requirements of class 1 according to EN 612. Before and after each series of measurements a sound calibrator meeting the requirements of class 1 according to EN 942 was applied to the microphone(s) for verifying the calibration of the entire measuring system. The compliance of the instrumentation system with the requirements of EN and EN was recently verified General Depot test site conditions The necessary conditions were ensured for the test site, including additionally a microphone height of 4m was also introduced according to 2002/49/CE directive. In this case as per the Zblock low platform barrier tests add. measurement s locations were introduced in order to evaluate more aspects of the screening and diffusion effect. The Athens tram Depot test site ensures free sound propagation with a ground essentially flat (with a max level variation from 0 m to -0,20 m, relative to the top of rail). The free field area around the microphones has a radius more that 3 times the measurement distance on both sides free of large reflecting objects like barriers, hills, rocks, bridges or buildings. In the vicinity of the microphones, no obstacles disturbing the sound field were permitted including persons. Furthermore the area between the tram vehicle and the microphones was completely free as possible of sound absorbing matter (e.g. snow, tall vegetation, other tracks) or reflective covering (e.g. water, ice). The ground cover in both test sites was an asphalt (tarmac) coverage. Regarding the meteorological conditions during the test the wind speed measured at the microphone height was below 1 m/s and there was no falling rain or snow. Temperature was between 8 & 12o C and humidity, in normal levels (some to %). The microphone positions axis was always horizontal and directed perpendicularly to the track. The microphone positions as per the relevant Standard EN ISO 3095:2005 are shown in the adjacent schematic. The microphone positions were selected were in one side (opposite site not available due to topographic conditions and the depot building set up) ensuring the basic
6 TIP4-CT Page 6 of 48 distance of 7,5 m from the track axis, at a height of 1,2 m above the top of rail, and also the distance of 25 m from the track axis, at a height of both 1,20 & 4,0 m, above the top of rail. as described above. The Athens Tram vehicle measured in the Depot site was in its normal operating conditions and already run in normal conditions at least km on track with normal traffic. During all measurements, the doors and windows of the vehicle were kept closed, and all auxiliary equipment on the test vehicles that normally operates during the run was in action. The embedded track with elastic encapsulation (CDM Prefarail system) was laid in both sites without rail joints (welded rail) and free of visible surface defects such as rail burns or pits and spikes caused by the compression of external material between wheel and rail: no audible impact noise due to welds was present. The photographic / schematic presentation of the site and the relevant measurement s setup is presented hereafter CDM Rubber Low height Absorbing Noise barrier In the figure 1 here below we present the conceptual sketch showing the test site and the relevant basic distances of the various locations of measurement points for the Low Platform Absorbing Barrier test site at Athens Tram Depot. In figure 2 a general view of the site for with & without barrier setups is presented. In figure 3 a general view of the CDM s prototype is presented along with figure 4 of a general overview of the positioning of the barrier at the test site at Athens Tram depot. In table 1 detailed geometrical data for all microphones locations are also presented. In the relevant figures 5 to 7 hereafter the test site location both for with & without barriers setups are presented including general views of tram pass byes with & without the barrier.
7 TIP4-CT Page 7 of 48 Low Platform Absorbing Barrier Test site MICROPHONE LOCATION 4 channel HARMONIE system Hor. Dist. Height Description Ch. 1 (H1) 3, 0,6 Reference point Ch. 2 (H2) 7, 1,2 ISO 3095/2005 Ch. 3 (H3) 10,00 1,2 NORDIC Prediction Model Ch. 4 (H4) 10,00 4,0 2002/49/EU Low Platform Absorbing Barrier Test site MICROPHONE LOCATION 2 channel SYMPHONIE system Hor. Dist. Height Description Ch. 1 (S1) 1,0 1,2 Reference point (Hor. Distance from external rail) Ch. 2 (S2) 25,0 1,2 ISO 3095/2005 Table 1 Channel S2 Channel H4 Channels H2 & H3 Measurement axis d=4-12 cm from Tram gabarit Channel H1 CDM s Rubber low barrier appox length m. Channel S1 Fig. 1. Conceptual sketch showing the CDM s Rubber Low Absorbing Noise barrier test site at Athens Tram Depot
8 TIP4-CT Page 8 of 48 without barrier with barrier Fig. 2 General view of the CDM s Rubber low height Noise barrier test site at Athens Tram Depot for both with & without barrier setups
9 TIP4-CT Page 9 of 48 Fig. 3 General view of the CDM s prototype Fig. 4 Positioning f the CDM s barrier at Athens Tram Depot (at approx. 4-12cm from vehicle ext. gabarit)
10 TIP4-CT Page 10 of 48 Fig. 5 Measurement s location setup for both With & Without barrier tests
11 TIP4-CT Page 11 of 48 Fig. 6 Tram pass by at Without barrier test Fig. 7 Tram pass by at With barrier test
12 TIP4-CT Page 12 of FIELD MEASUREMENTS RESULTS 2006 AT ATHENS TRAM DEPOT - HELLINIKON GREECE A total of 2X12=24 tram pass byes of the same vehicle (as per D4.3 setting) were recorded and analysed in this test site according to the setup described above for various speeds i.e 10,20,30 & 37 to 40 Km/h (3 pass bys per speed and per test). The analytical results per pass by are presented (including full 1/3 octave band analysis) in Annex 1 hereafter for both With & Without the CDM barrier tests. The main results for both descriptors Leq (tram passage) and Lmax are presented in the tables and relevant graphs hereafter. In order to evaluate the noise attenuation in various measurement locations, separate calculations were made in both tests and the relevant attenuation was established by 2 separate statistical approaches (called approach 1 & 2 respectively as per D 4.3 relevant analysis) in chapters 3.1 & 3.2 as presented here after. 3.1 Approach 1 By comparison of each speed level pass bys for with & without barrier tests the Average Leq attenuation per measurement point was calculated and the average insertion loss for each point was calculated for all speeds. These results are presented in the following tables and figures. including the average LAmax values for each independent vehicle speed/barrier scenario (8 in total). This approach method (as per D4.3 relevant analysis) has the obvious advantage of calculating the IL including both duct attenuation effects and screening effects, but has the drawback of not getting a full normalization of the source strength for each passage (despite the fact that during the measurements we have ensured same tram vehicle & operator, same track and three pass byes for each speed limit so it is expected that the average reflects an appropriate approach of the IL values). Based on the above approach an average insertion loss of approx. 7,3 db(a) ± 0,7 db(a) was calculated for the measurement points H1,H2,H3,H4 & S2 by the use of this type of rubber low height barrier.
13 TIP4-CT Page 13 of 48 Table 2 Average Leq attenuation per measurement point/speed for Without & WITH barrier tests Vehicle Speed (Km/h) Km/h Km/h Km/h S1 3,7 1,8 1,6 2,7 2,5 H1 7,5 8,2 8,6 10,0 8,6 H2 6,0 7,1 7,8 8,7 7,4 H3 5,9 7,0 7,5 8,5 7,2 H4 4,6 5,2 6,6 7,0 5,9 S2 3,8 5,4 5,8 6,1 5,3 Measurement points 10 Km/h Average attenuation for all speeds Table 3 Average Lmax fluctuation per measurement point for all speeds for Without & WITH barrier tests Vehicle Speed (Km/h) Measurement points 10 Km/h Without barrier 20 Km/h Without barrier 30 Km/h Without barrier Km/h Without barrier 10 Km/h With barrier 20 Km/h With barrier 30 Km/h With barrier Km/h With barrier S1 77,0 83,6 86,1 87,5 73,2 82,8,4 87,3 H1 74,8 82,1,6 87,1,1 72,6 76,5 78,1 H2 69,2 76,2,6 81,5 61,4 67,8 71,9 73,3 H3 68,7,2 79,8 81,1 61,0 67,1 71,8 73,6 H4 66,4 73,7 78,1 79,8 61,8 69,3 71,0 72,9 S2 64,1,0 73,2,7 59,1 64,7 67,8 69,8 Table 4 Average Lmax attenuation per measurement point for all speeds for Without & WITH barrier tests Measurement points Vehicle Speed (Km/h) Average & st. deviation for all speeds 10 Km/h 20 Km/h 30 Km/h Km/h S1 3,8 0,8 0,7 0,2 1,4 1,7 H1 9,7 9,5 9,1 9,0 9,3 0,3 H2 7,8 8,4 8,6 8,3 8,3 0,4 H3 7,7 8,1 8,0 7,6 7,8 0,2 H4 4,6 4,4 7,0 6,9 5,7 1,5 S2 5,0 5,3 5,5 5,9 5,4 0,7 Average H2/H3/H4 points/all speeds 7,3 0,7
14 TIP4-CT Page 14 of 48 CDM LOW HEIGHT BARRIER AT ATHENS TRAM DEPOT Average Leq attenuation ("with" vs "without" test conditions) per measurement point at all tram speeds including distance & screening effects 16,0 12,0 Noise attenuation in db(a) 8,0 4,0 0,0 S1 H1 H2 H3 H4 S2 Measurement points average all speeds 10 Km/h 20 Km/h 30 Km/h Km/h Fig. 8
15 TIP4-CT Page 15 of 48 CDM LOW HEIGHT BARRIER AT ATHENS TRAM DEPOT Average Lmax fluctuation per measurement point at all tram speeds "with" & "without" barrier,0,0,0 Lmax in db(a),0,0,0,0,0,0 S1 H1 H2 H3 H4 S2 Measurement points 10 Km/h 20 Km/h 30 Km/h Km/h 10 Km/h With barrier 20 Km/h With barrier 30 Km/h With barrier Km/h With barrier Fig. 9
16 TIP4-CT Page 16 of Approach 2 By this approach as also per D the differences of average Lmax values between all points vs the reference point S1 were calculated for each speed level and for both with & without barrier tests (see tables & figures hereafter). By this approach and given to the fact that reference point S1 reflects for both tests the source emission with no distance interference, the results of the relevant tables hereafter reflects the noise attenuation at all measurement locations including both source absorption/screening effect and distance attenuation. By abstracting the attenuation values of with barrier test from the relative values of the without barrier test, the insertion loss of the barrier it self is then calculated. The relevant approach is presented in the figures hereafter. This approach has the advantage of normalizing the source strength of the tram (see relevant negative point in approach 1 above) to account for effects from deviations in speed etc., but has also the possible drawback of underestimating the insertion loss (IL) of the barrier due to duct attenuation effects. Based on the above approach an average insertion loss of approx. 5,9 db(a) ± 2,2 db(a) was calculated for the measurement points H1,H2,H3,H4 & S2 by the use of this type of low absorbing platform barrier.
17 TIP4-CT Page 17 of 48 Table 5 Average Lmax attenuation for CDM low height barrier per measurement point vs reference point S1 for Without & WITH tests including distance effect Attenuation from S1 reference point to all measurement points 10 Km/h Without barrier 20 Km/h Without barrier Vehicle Speed (Km/h) for Without With tests 30 Km/h Without barrier Km/h Without barrier 10 Km/h With barrier 20 Km/h With barrier 30 Km/h With barrier Km/h With barrier S1-H1 2,2 1,5 0,6 0,4 8,1 10,2 9,0 9,3 S1-H2 7,8 7,4 5,6 6,0 11,8 15,1 13,5 14,1 S1-H3 8,3 8,5 6,4 6,4 12,2 15,7 13,6 13,8 S1-H4 10,6 9,9 8,1 7,7 11,4 13,5 14,4 14,4 S1-S2 12,9 13,7 12,9 11,8 14,1 18,1 17,7 17,5 Table 6 Lmax index average insertion loss for the CDM Low height barrier per measurement point for Without & WITH tests Measurement point Averages & st.deviation for all Km/h Km/h Km/h Km/h speeds H1 (d=3, H=0,6) 5,9 8,7 8,4 8,8 8,0 1,4 H2 (d=7,5 H=1,2) 3,9 7,6 7,9 8,1 6,9 2,0 H3 (d=10 H=1,2) 3,9 7,3 7,3 7,4 6,5 1,7 H4 (d=10 H=4,0) 0,7 3,6 6,3 5,1 4,4 2,8 S2 (d=25 H=1,2) 1,2 4,5 4,8 5,7 4,0 2,0 Average H2/H3/H4 points/all speeds 5,9 2,2
18 TIP4-CT Page 18 of 48 CDM LOW HEIGHT BARRIER AT ATHENS TRAM DEPOT Average Lmax attenuation at all points from reference point (S1) for all speeds and for WITH & WITHOUT BARRIER contitions including screening & distance effect 30,0 25,0 Noise attenuation in db(a) 20,0 15,0 10,0 5,0 0,0 S1-H1 S1-H2 S1-H3 S1-H4 S1-S2 Measurement point compared to source (point S1) 10 Km/h Without barrier 20 Km/h Without barrier 30 Km/h Without barrier Km/h Without barrier 10 Km/h With barrier 20 Km/h With barrier 30 Km/h With barrier Km/h With barrier Fig. 10
19 TIP4-CT Page 19 of 48 CDM LOW HEIGHT BARRIER AT ATHENS TRAM DEPOT Lamax Average screen insrtion loss All measurement points - All speeds not including distance effect 16,0 12,0 Noise attenuation in db(a) 8,0 4,0 0,0 H1 (d=3, H=0,6) H2 (d=7,5 H=1,2) H3 (d=10 H=1,2) H4 (d=10 H=4,0) S2 (d=25 H=1,2) Measurement point (position characteristics) average all speeds 10 Km/h 20 Km/h 30 Km/h Km/h Fig. 11
20 TIP4-CT Page 20 of DISCUSSION AND CONCLUDING REMARKS Based on the above results we can conclude the following remarks & conclusions regarding the noise attenuation that can be achieved from the tested CDM Low height barrier for trams and trains. This rubber low height noise barrier can also ensure an important insertion los both on noise source & screening effect due to his absorbing capabilities. It was establish that an average insertion loss varying from 7,3 db(a) ± 0,7 db(a) to 5,9 ± 2,2 db(a) (as per the presented approaches 3.1 & 3.2 above) for a speed range from 10 up to 40 Km/h is ensured by the use of this type of low absorbing platform barrier. However the tested prototype needs to be upgraded on the aesthetical & rubber crumb quality & cohesion level in order to facilitate the integration in the urban context and not creating adverse population reactions.
21 TIP4-CT Page 21 of 48 ANNEX 1 CDM s rubber low height platform barrier noise measurement results per pass by/speed with & without barrier
22 TIP4-CT Page 22 of 48 WITHOUT CDM BARRIER MICROPHONE LOCATION Hor. Dist. Height Description Ch. 1 (H1) 3, 0,6 Reference point Ch. 2 (H2) 7, 1,2 ISO 3095/2005 Ch. 3 (H3) 10,00 1,2 NORDIC Prediction Model Ch. 4 (H4) 10,00 4,0 2002/49/EU MICROPHONE LOCATION Hor. Dist. Height Description Ch. 1 (S1) 1,0 1,2 Reference point Ch. 2 (S2) 25,0 1,2 ISO 3095/2005
23 TIP4-CT Page 23 of 48 SPEED =10 km/h Passby1 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h22m25s0 67,4dB TUE 13/06/06 10h22m45s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h22m25s0 64,1dB TUE 13/06/06 10h22m45s0 Ch. 3 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h22m25s0 63,6dB TUE 13/06/06 10h22m45s0 Ch. 4 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h22m25s0 62,6dB TUE 13/06/06 10h22m45s m26 22m28 22m30 22m32 22m34 22m36 22m38 22m40 22m42 22m44 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 67,4 59,4 74,6 59,5,4 66,2,2 73,5 Ch. 2 Leq A db 64,1 58,4 69,9 59,1 59,9 63,8,9 67,7 Ch. 3 Leq A db 63,6 58,5 68,4 58,7 59,6 63,4,1 67,1 Ch. 4 Leq A db 62,6 58,3 67,0 58,4 58,8 62,4 64,0,7 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h22m25s0 68,3dB TUE 13/06/06 10h22m45s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h22m25s0 59,1dB TUE 13/06/06 10h22m45s0 22m26 22m28 22m30 22m32 22m34 22m36 22m38 22m40 22m42 22m44 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 68,3 59,2 76,6 59,4,1 64,5 72,8,9 Ch. 2 Leq A db 59,1,8 63,4,8 56,7 59,0,4 61,6
24 TIP4-CT Page 24 of 48 Passby2 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h26m25s300 67,7dB TUE 13/06/06 10h26m44s300 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h26m25s300 64,4dB TUE 13/06/06 10h26m44s300 Ch. 3 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h26m25s300 63,9dB TUE 13/06/06 10h26m44s300 Ch. 4 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h26m25s300 62,8dB TUE 13/06/06 10h26m44s300 26m26 26m28 26m30 26m32 26m34 26m36 26m38 26m40 26m42 26m44 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 67,7 58,0,3 58,6 59,9 66,3,8,1 Ch. 2 Leq A db 64,4 58,3 69,0 58,3 58,7 63,7 66,5 68,6 Ch. 3 Leq A db 63,9 57,9 68,3 58,2 58,9 63,5,9 67,4 Ch. 4 Leq A db 62,8 58,3 66,2 58,6 59,2 62,5 64,2,5 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h26m27s0 69,1dB TUE 13/06/06 10h26m46s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h26m27s0 59,5dB TUE 13/06/06 10h26m46s0 26m28 26m30 26m32 26m34 26m36 26m38 26m40 26m42 26m44 26m46 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 69,1 59,1 79,1 59,1,6,2 72,7 78,3 Ch. 2 Leq A db 59,5,0 64,5,6 56,3 59,4 61,0 62,8
25 TIP4-CT Page 25 of 48 Passby3 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h30m18s100 67,0dB TUE 13/06/06 10h30m38s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h30m18s100 63,6dB TUE 13/06/06 10h30m38s0 Ch. 3 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h30m18s100 63,2dB TUE 13/06/06 10h30m38s0 Ch. 4 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h30m18s100 62,6dB TUE 13/06/06 10h30m38s0 30m20 30m22 30m24 30m26 30m28 30m30 30m32 30m34 30m36 30m38 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 67,0 57,6 74,5 58,5 59,1,8,0 73,0 Ch. 2 Leq A db 63,6 58,5 68,7 58,6 59,4 63,1,5 67,7 Ch. 3 Leq A db 63,2 57,4 69,4 57,4 58,5 63,0 64,8 67,0 Ch. 4 Leq A db 62,6 57,3 66,0 57,7 59,2 62,6 64,0,1 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h30m20s100 68,1dB TUE 13/06/06 10h30m40s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h30m20s100,0dB TUE 13/06/06 10h30m40s0 30m22 30m24 30m26 30m28 30m30 30m32 30m34 30m36 30m38 30m40 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 68,1 58,0 78,0 58,6 59,6 64,2 72,7 76,5 Ch. 2 Leq A db,0,6 64,4 56,0 56,7 59,7 61,5 62,5
26 TIP4-CT Page 26 of 48 SPEED =20 km/h Passby1 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h34m01s0,4dB TUE 13/06/06 10h34m13s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h34m01s0 71,4dB TUE 13/06/06 10h34m13s0 Ch. 3 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h34m01s0,9dB TUE 13/06/06 10h34m13s0 Ch. 4 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h34m01s0 69,5dB TUE 13/06/06 10h34m13s0 34m02 34m04 34m06 34m08 34m10 34m12 34m14 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db,4,4 83,4,8 61,0 73,7 79,0 83,3 Ch. 2 Leq A db 71,4,0 77,6,0 61,2,9 73,8 77,2 Ch. 3 Leq A db,9,9 77,1 61,1 61,9,3 73,2 76,8 Ch. 4 Leq A db 69,5 61,1,4 61,8 62,8 69,1 72,1 73,3 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h34m03s100,1dB TUE 13/06/06 10h34m15s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h34m03s100 66,7dB TUE 13/06/06 10h34m15s0 34m04 34m06 34m08 34m10 34m12 34m14 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db,1 59,9 83,5,2 61,4 71,7 79,9 83,4 Ch. 2 Leq A db 66,7 56,7 71,9 56,8 58,2 66,6 68,9 71,4
27 TIP4-CT Page 27 of 48 Passby2 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h37m44s000 74,7dB TUE 13/06/06 10h37ms400 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h37m44s000,9dB TUE 13/06/06 10h37ms400 Ch. 3 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h37m44s000,3dB TUE 13/06/06 10h37ms400 Ch. 4 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h37m44s000 69,0dB TUE 13/06/06 10h37ms400 37m4437m45 37m46 37m47 37m48 37m49 37m 37m51 37m52 37m53 37m54 37m Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 74,7 61,8 81,5 62,3 62,5 73,3 78,8 81,2 Ch. 2 Leq A db,9 61,1 74,9 61,6 62,5,4 73,6 74,8 Ch. 3 Leq A db,3 61,6 73,8 61,6 62,8,3 72,6 73,3 Ch. 4 Leq A db 69,0 62,1 72,4 62,1 63,2 69,0,9 72,1 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h37m45s0 74,9dB TUE 13/06/06 10h37m57s100 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h37m45s0,4dB TUE 13/06/06 10h37m57s100 37m46 37m47 37m48 37m49 37m 37m51 37m52 37m53 37m54 37m 37m56 37m57 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 74,9,0 83,5,1 61,5,7 79,8 82,8 Ch. 2 Leq A db,4 56,8 68,5 57,0 57,9,6 67,0 68,3
28 TIP4-CT Page 28 of 48 Passby3 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h41m14s200 74,1dB TUE 13/06/06 10h41m25s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h41m14s200,4dB TUE 13/06/06 10h41m25s0 Ch. 3 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h41m14s200 69,8dB TUE 13/06/06 10h41m25s0 Ch. 4 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h41m14s200 68,6dB TUE 13/06/06 10h41m25s0 41m16 41m18 41m20 41m22 41m24 41m26 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 74,1 61,5 81,5 61,5 62,2 72,7 78,6 81,0 Ch. 2 Leq A db,4,1 76,1 61,9 62,9 69,9 73,3,4 Ch. 3 Leq A db 69,8,1 74,6,2 62,0 69,6 72,3 73,7 Ch. 4 Leq A db 68,6 61,1 73,3 61,6 62,5 68,3,7 73,0 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h41m15s0 74,5dB TUE 13/06/06 10h41m27s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 10h41m15s0,2dB TUE 13/06/06 10h41m27s0 41m16 41m18 41m20 41m22 41m24 41m26 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 74,5 61,1 83,9 61,1 61,8,7 79,1 82,8 Ch. 2 Leq A db,2 56,0 69,5 56,7 57,4,0 67,3 67,9
29 TIP4-CT Page 29 of 48 SPEED =30 km/h Passby1 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h01m46s000 79,4dB TUE 13/06/06 11h01m52s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h01m46s000,8dB TUE 13/06/06 11h01m52s0 Ch. 3 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h01m46s000,1dB TUE 13/06/06 11h01m52s0 Ch. 4 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h01m46s000 74,0dB TUE 13/06/06 11h01m52s0 01m46 01m47 01m48 01m49 01m 01m51 01m52 01m53 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 79,4 64,9 86,3 64,8 66,1 78,1 83,6 86,2 Ch. 2 Leq A db,8,9 81,4,8 66,7,8 78,2 81,3 Ch. 3 Leq A db,1 64,9,3 64,8 66,9,4 77,5,2 Ch. 4 Leq A db 74,0,4 78,7,3 67,1 74,0 76,1 78,6 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h01m47s0 78,8dB TUE 13/06/06 11h01m54s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h01m47s0 69,6dB TUE 13/06/06 11h01m54s0 01m48 01m49 01m 01m51 01m52 01m53 01m54 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 78,8 64,8 86,1 64,7 66,5 76,9 83,0 86,0 Ch. 2 Leq A db 69,6 61,8 73,2 61,7 63,0 69,5 72,1 73,1
30 TIP4-CT Page 30 of 48 Passby2 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h05m06s0 79,9dB TUE 13/06/06 11h05m13s400 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h05m06s0 76,1dB TUE 13/06/06 11h05m13s400 Ch. 3 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h05m06s0,6dB TUE 13/06/06 11h05m13s400 Ch. 4 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h05m06s0 74,3dB TUE 13/06/06 11h05m13s400 05m07 05m08 05m09 05m10 05m11 05m12 05m13 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 79,9 64,6,3 64,5,7 79,4 83,9,2 Ch. 2 Leq A db 76,1,6,2,5 66,9 76,4 78,7,1 Ch. 3 Leq A db,6,2 79,3,1 66,6,5 77,9 79,3 Ch. 4 Leq A db 74,3 66,3 77,8 66,2 67,3 74,4 76,1 77,7 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h05m07s0 79,2dB TUE 13/06/06 11h05m14s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h05m07s0 69,9dB TUE 13/06/06 11h05m14s0 05m08 05m09 05m10 05m11 05m12 05m13 05m14 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 79,2 66,3 86,1 66,2 66,8 76,3 83,2 86,0 Ch. 2 Leq A db 69,9 61,8 73,3 61,7 62,8 69,4 72,3 73,2
31 TIP4-CT Page 31 of 48 Passby3 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h09m16s0 79,6dB TUE 13/06/06 11h09m24s200 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h09m16s0,7dB TUE 13/06/06 11h09m24s200 Ch. 3 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h09m16s0,1dB TUE 13/06/06 11h09m24s200 Ch. 4 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h09m16s0 74,2dB TUE 13/06/06 11h09m24s200 09m17 09m18 09m19 09m20 09m21 09m22 09m23 09m24 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 79,6 64,4,1 64,3,8 78,5 83,2,0 Ch. 2 Leq A db,7 66,4,1 66,3 66,7,7 78,3,0 Ch. 3 Leq A db,1,0 79,7 64,9 66,8,2 77,5 79,6 Ch. 4 Leq A db 74,2 67,3 77,7 67,2 68,4 74,1 76,1 77,6 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h09m18s300 78,9dB TUE 13/06/06 11h09m25s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h09m18s300 69,6dB TUE 13/06/06 11h09m25s0 09m19 09m20 09m21 09m22 09m23 09m24 09m25 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 78,9,5 86,2,4 67,3 76,2 83,1 86,1 Ch. 2 Leq A db 69,6,1 73,2,0 61,0 69,6 71,6 73,1
32 TIP4-CT Page 32 of 48 SPEED =30+ km/h Passby1 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h12m19s0 81,8dB TUE 13/06/06 11h12m26s100 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h12m19s0 77,9dB TUE 13/06/06 11h12m26s100 Ch. 3 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h12m19s0 77,3dB TUE 13/06/06 11h12m26s100 Ch. 4 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h12m19s0 76,1dB TUE 13/06/06 11h12m26s100 12m20 12m21 12m22 12m23 12m24 12m25 12m26 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 81,8 67,2 86,8 67,1 68,6 81,0,3 86,7 Ch. 2 Leq A db 77,9 68,3 81,7 68,3 69,1 78,2,3 81,6 Ch. 3 Leq A db 77,3 67,0 81,3 66,9 68,6 77,4 79,9 81,2 Ch. 4 Leq A db 76,1 68,7 79,8 68,6 69,8 76,4 78,3 79,7 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h12m22s400 81,0dB TUE 13/06/06 11h12m28s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h12m22s400 71,2dB TUE 13/06/06 11h12m28s0 12m23 12m24 12m25 12m26 12m27 12m28 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 81,0 67,4 87,1 67,3 68,3 78,4,5 87,0 Ch. 2 Leq A db 71,2 63,2 74,9 63,1 63,9 71,1 73,5 74,8
33 TIP4-CT Page 33 of 48 Passby2 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h15m52s000 82,2dB TUE 13/06/06 11h15m58s000 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h15m52s000 78,2dB TUE 13/06/06 11h15m58s000 Ch. 3 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h15m52s000 77,6dB TUE 13/06/06 11h15m58s000 Ch. 4 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h15m52s000 76,5dB TUE 13/06/06 11h15m58s000 15m52 15m53 15m54 15m 15m56 15m57 15m58 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 82,2 66,7 87,4 66,6 69,4 81,0,6 87,3 Ch. 2 Leq A db 78,2 68,8 81,5 68,7 69,2 78,4,8 81,4 Ch. 3 Leq A db 77,6 66,7 81,5 66,6 69,1 77,8,0 81,4 Ch. 4 Leq A db 76,5 68,5 79,9 68,4,3 76,3 78,6 79,8 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h15m53s0 81,7dB TUE 13/06/06 11h15m59s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h15m53s0 72,2dB TUE 13/06/06 11h15m59s0 15m54 15m 15m56 15m57 15m58 15m59 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 81,7 68,5 88,0 68,4,3 79,5 86,0 88,0 Ch. 2 Leq A db 72,2 64,5 76,1 64,4 64,9 72,2 74,7 76,0
34 TIP4-CT Page 34 of 48 Passby3 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h19m10s0 81,5dB TUE 13/06/06 11h19m16s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h19m10s0 77,6dB TUE 13/06/06 11h19m16s0 Ch. 3 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h19m10s0 77,0dB TUE 13/06/06 11h19m16s0 Ch. 4 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h19m10s0,8dB TUE 13/06/06 11h19m16s0 19m11 19m12 19m13 19m14 19m15 19m16 19m17 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 81,5 66,5 87,0 66,4 69,4,7,4 86,9 Ch. 2 Leq A db 77,6 68,7 81,4 68,6,1 77,7,2 81,3 Ch. 3 Leq A db 77,0 67,0,6 67,0 69,7 77,0 79,6,6 Ch. 4 Leq A db,8 69,0 79,8 68,9,5,8 77,9 79,7 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h19m11s0 81,0dB TUE 13/06/06 11h19m18s300 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 11h19m11s0 71,7dB TUE 13/06/06 11h19m18s300 19m12 19m13 19m14 19m15 19m16 19m17 19m18 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 81,0 68,7 87,4 68,6 69,8 78,0,2 87,3 Ch. 2 Leq A db 71,7 63,6 76,1 63,6,0 71,6 74,1 76,0
35 TIP4-CT Page 35 of 48 WITH CDM BARRIER MICROPHONE LOCATION Hor. Dist. Height Description Ch. 1 (H1) 3, 0,6 Reference point Ch. 2 (H2) 7, 1,2 ISO 3095/2005 Ch. 3 (H3) 10,00 1,2 NORDIC Prediction Model Ch. 4 (H4) 10,00 4,0 2002/49/EU MICROPHONE LOCATION Hor. Dist. Height Description Ch. 1 (S1) 1,0 1,2 Reference point Ch. 2 (S2) 25,0 1,2 ISO 3095/2005
36 TIP4-CT Page 36 of 48 SPEED =10 km/h Passby1 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 12h27m02s400 59,7dB TUE 13/06/06 12h27m22s200 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 12h27m02s400 58,1dB TUE 13/06/06 12h27m22s200 Ch. 3 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 12h27m02s400 57,9dB TUE 13/06/06 12h27m22s200 Ch. 4 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 12h27m02s400 58,5dB TUE 13/06/06 12h27m22s m04 27m06 27m08 27m10 27m12 27m14 27m16 27m18 27m20 27m22 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 59,7 54,3,7 54,8,5 59,2 61,9 63,8 Ch. 2 Leq A db 58,1 54,0 61,5 54,1 54,9 57,9 59,5 61,4 Ch. 3 Leq A db 57,9 54,1 62,6 54,3,0 57,6 59,3 62,0 Ch. 4 Leq A db 58,5,3 63,7,2 56,2 58,0 59,8 63,2 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 12h27m04s0 64,2dB TUE 13/06/06 12h27m24s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 12h27m04s0,9dB TUE 13/06/06 12h27m24s0 27m06 27m08 27m10 27m12 27m14 27m16 27m18 27m20 27m22 27m24 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 64,2 56,5 71,6 56,7 57,3 61,4 68,8,8 Ch. 2 Leq A db,9 53,4,4 53,6 54,1,6 57,0 59,9
37 TIP4-CT Page 37 of 48 Passby2 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 12h30ms0,7dB TUE 13/06/06 12h31m06s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 12h30ms0 59,0dB TUE 13/06/06 12h31m06s0 Ch. 3 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 12h30ms0 58,6dB TUE 13/06/06 12h31m06s0 Ch. 4 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 12h30ms0 59,0dB TUE 13/06/06 12h31m06s m52 30m54 30m56 30m58 31m00 31m02 31m04 31m06 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db,7,8,7,8 56,8,6 62,2,3 Ch. 2 Leq A db 59,0,6 61,7,9 56,3 58,9,2 61,5 Ch. 3 Leq A db 58,6,1 61,1,5,9 58,6 59,6,6 Ch. 4 Leq A db 59,0 56,0 61,5 56,0 56,5 59,0,1 61,1 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 12h30m52s400,6dB TUE 13/06/06 12h31m08s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 12h30m52s400 56,9dB TUE 13/06/06 12h31m08s0 30m54 30m56 30m58 31m00 31m02 31m04 31m06 31m08 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db,6 58,3 74,5 58,2 59,1 63,1 69,3 73,6 Ch. 2 Leq A db 56,9 54,0 59,1 54,0 54,6 56,8 58,0 59,0
38 TIP4-CT Page 38 of 48 Passby3 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 12h34m34s0 59,1dB TUE 13/06/06 12h34m51s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 12h34m34s0 57,0dB TUE 13/06/06 12h34m51s0 Ch. 3 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 12h34m34s0 56,4dB TUE 13/06/06 12h34m51s0 Ch. 4 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 12h34m34s0 56,7dB TUE 13/06/06 12h34m51s m36 34m38 34m40 34m42 34m44 34m46 34m48 34m 34m52 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 59,1 54,5 63,9 54,5 54,9 58,2 61,3 63,7 Ch. 2 Leq A db 57,0 54,3 61,1 54,2 54,9 56,9 58,2,3 Ch. 3 Leq A db 56,4 53,9 59,2 54,0 54,4 56,2 57,5 58,8 Ch. 4 Leq A db 56,7,0,3,1,5 56,5 57,6 59,4 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 12h34m36s0 64,5dB TUE 13/06/06 12h34m53s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 12h34m36s0 54,3dB TUE 13/06/06 12h34m53s m38 34m40 34m42 34m44 34m46 34m48 34m 34m52 34m54 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 64,5 56,3 73,5 56,5 57,3,7 69,2 72,0 Ch. 2 Leq A db 54,3 52,5 57,8 52,6 52,9 54,2,0 56,2
39 TIP4-CT Page 39 of 48 SPEED =20 km/h Passby1 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 12h44m59s100,7dB TUE 13/06/06 12h45m12s000 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 12h44m59s100 63,1dB TUE 13/06/06 12h45m12s000 Ch. 3 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 12h44m59s100 62,7dB TUE 13/06/06 12h45m12s000 Ch. 4 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 12h44m59s100 63,6dB TUE 13/06/06 12h45m12s000 45m00 45m02 45m04 45m06 45m08 45m10 45m12 \ Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db,7 57,9 71,5 58,0 58,3 64,8 68,6 71,4 Ch. 2 Leq A db 63,1 56,9 66,4 57,1 57,6 63,2,1 66,2 Ch. 3 Leq A db 62,7 56,5 66,0 56,6 57,3 62,6 64,9,9 Ch. 4 Leq A db 63,6 58,5 71,2 58,9 59,7 63,0,8 66,7 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 12h44m59s0 71,9dB TUE 13/06/06 12h45m12s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 12h44m59s0,0dB TUE 13/06/06 12h45m12s0 45m00 45m02 45m04 45m06 45m08 45m10 45m12 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 71,9,0,8,2 61,4 67,6 76,7,5 Ch. 2 Leq A db,0 54,2 64,0 54,4,6,0 61,7 62,8
40 TIP4-CT Page 40 of 48 Passby2 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h04m42s0,8dB TUE 13/06/06 13h04m53s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h04m42s0 63,1dB TUE 13/06/06 13h04m53s0 Ch. 3 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h04m42s0 62,7dB TUE 13/06/06 13h04m53s0 Ch. 4 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h04m42s0 62,8dB TUE 13/06/06 13h04m53s0 04m43 04m44 04m45 04m46 04m47 04m48 04m49 04m 04m51 04m52 04m53 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db,8 57,6 73,3 57,5 58,3 64,8 69,0,5 Ch. 2 Leq A db 63,1 59,0 67,0 59,2 59,4 62,6,3 66,0 Ch. 3 Leq A db 62,7 58,8 66,6 59,1 59,4 62,1 64,5 66,1 Ch. 4 Leq A db 62,8 59,9 67,6,0,2 62,2 64,7 66,3 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h04m44s0 72,5dB TUE 13/06/06 13h04ms000 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h04m44s0,0dB TUE 13/06/06 13h04ms m45 04m46 04m47 04m48 04m49 04m 04m51 04m52 04m53 04m54 04m Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 72,5 61,5 83,6 61,9 62,8 67,9 77,3,5 Ch. 2 Leq A db,0,8 64,8,7 56,7 59,6 61,5 63,1
41 TIP4-CT Page 41 of 48 Passby3 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h17m19s0 67,9dB TUE 13/06/06 13h17m30s000 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h17m19s0,0dB TUE 13/06/06 13h17m30s000 Ch. 3 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h17m19s0 64,5dB TUE 13/06/06 13h17m30s000 Ch. 4 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h17m19s0 64,9dB TUE 13/06/06 13h17m30s m20 17m21 17m22 17m23 17m24 17m25 17m26 17m27 17m28 17m29 17m30 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 67,9 58,6 73,1 58,5 58,8 67,1 71,2 72,6 Ch. 2 Leq A db,0 57,4 69,9 57,6 58,4,1 67,3 68,8 Ch. 3 Leq A db 64,5 57,4 68,7 57,5 58,8 64,1 67,0 68,3 Ch. 4 Leq A db 64,9 59,8 69,2,3,6 64,4 67,1 68,7 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h17m20s0 74,7dB TUE 13/06/06 13h17m31s000 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h17m20s0 61,1dB TUE 13/06/06 13h17m31s m21 17m22 17m23 17m24 17m25 17m26 17m27 17m28 17m29 17m30 17m31 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 74,7,9 84,1,9 63,2 69,6 79,3 82,8 Ch. 2 Leq A db 61,1,4,3,4 56,0 61,1 63,0 64,8
42 TIP4-CT Page 42 of 48 SPEED =30 km/h Passby1 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h20m28s100,9dB TUE 13/06/06 13h20m35s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h20m28s100 68,0dB TUE 13/06/06 13h20m35s0 Ch. 3 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h20m28s100 67,8dB TUE 13/06/06 13h20m35s0 Ch. 4 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h20m28s100 67,6dB TUE 13/06/06 13h20m35s m29 20m30 20m31 20m32 20m33 20m34 20m35 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db,9,4 76,3,3,7 69,7 74,8 76,2 Ch. 2 Leq A db 68,0,7 72,3,6 61,6 68,0,5 72,2 Ch. 3 Leq A db 67,8,3 72,3,2 61,3 67,6,1 72,2 Ch. 4 Leq A db 67,6 62,0 71,1 61,9 63,2 67,2 69,5 71,0 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h20m29s100 77,7dB TUE 13/06/06 13h20m36s300 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h20m29s100 64,0dB TUE 13/06/06 13h20m36s m30 20m31 20m32 20m33 20m34 20m35 20m36 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 77,7 63,5,1 63,4,1 73,7 82,6,0 Ch. 2 Leq A db 64,0 57,5 67,8 57,4 58,3 64,0 66,3 67,7
43 TIP4-CT Page 43 of 48 Passby2 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h23m41s100 71,8dB TUE 13/06/06 13h23m47s300 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h23m41s100 68,7dB TUE 13/06/06 13h23m47s300 Ch. 3 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h23m41s100 68,4dB TUE 13/06/06 13h23m47s300 Ch. 4 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h23m41s100 68,0dB TUE 13/06/06 13h23m47s m42 23m43 23m44 23m45 23m46 23m47 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 71,8 61,2 76,4 61,2 61,7 71,4,2 76,3 Ch. 2 Leq A db 68,7 62,0 72,1 61,9 62,9 68,5,7 72,0 Ch. 3 Leq A db 68,4 61,7 72,0 61,6 62,7 67,9,3 71,9 Ch. 4 Leq A db 68,0 63,4 71,1 63,3 63,8 68,0 69,9 71,0 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h23m42s300 77,7dB TUE 13/06/06 13h23m49s300 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h23m42s300 64,3dB TUE 13/06/06 13h23m49s m43 23m44 23m45 23m46 23m47 23m48 23m49 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 77,7 64,8 86,9 64,7 66,1 73,6 82,0 86,8 Ch. 2 Leq A db 64,3 58,3 67,8 58,2 59,1 64,1 66,3 67,7
44 TIP4-CT Page 44 of 48 Passby3 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h27m10s400,5dB TUE 13/06/06 13h27m18s000 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h27m10s400 67,4dB TUE 13/06/06 13h27m18s000 Ch. 3 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h27m10s400 67,1dB TUE 13/06/06 13h27m18s000 Ch. 4 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h27m10s400 67,0dB TUE 13/06/06 13h27m18s m11 27m12 27m13 27m14 27m15 27m16 27m17 27m18 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db,5,8 76,7,7 62,1 69,1 74,0 76,6 Ch. 2 Leq A db 67,4 61,6 71,4 61,5 62,2 67,1 69,8 71,3 Ch. 3 Leq A db 67,1,9 71,1,8 61,5 66,5 69,5 71,0 Ch. 4 Leq A db 67,0 63,0,9 62,9 63,8 66,5 68,8,8 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h27m12s400 76,7dB TUE 13/06/06 13h27m19s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h27m12s400 63,5dB TUE 13/06/06 13h27m19s0 27m13 27m14 27m15 27m16 27m17 27m18 27m19 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 76,7 64,3 84,3 64,2 66,2 72,6 82,2 84,2 Ch. 2 Leq A db 63,5 58,3 67,7 58,2 58,9 62,9,5 67,6
45 TIP4-CT Page 45 of 48 SPEED =30+ km/h Passby1 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h30m23s0 71,4dB TUE 13/06/06 13h30m31s200 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h30m23s0 68,7dB TUE 13/06/06 13h30m31s200 Ch. 3 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h30m23s0 68,3dB TUE 13/06/06 13h30m31s200 Ch. 4 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h30m23s0 68,6dB TUE 13/06/06 13h30m31s m24 30m25 30m26 30m27 30m28 30m29 30m30 30m31 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 71,4,4 77,4,3 62,0 68,0,4 77,3 Ch. 2 Leq A db 68,7 59,2 72,7 59,1,9 68,2 71,6 72,6 Ch. 3 Leq A db 68,3 59,2 73,5 59,1,0 67,7 71,3 73,4 Ch. 4 Leq A db 68,6 62,5 72,9 62,4 63,3 68,2,7 72,8 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h30m25s0 78,1dB TUE 13/06/06 13h30m33s300 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h30m25s0 64,7dB TUE 13/06/06 13h30m33s300 30m26 30m27 30m28 30m29 30m30 30m31 30m32 30m33 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 78,1 63,7 86,6 63,6,3 73,7 83,1 86,5 Ch. 2 Leq A db 64,7 56,7 69,3 56,6 57,8 64,7 67,2 69,2
46 TIP4-CT Page 46 of 48 Passby2 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h33m22s0 71,7dB TUE 13/06/06 13h33m30s000 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h33m22s0 69,0dB TUE 13/06/06 13h33m30s000 Ch. 3 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h33m22s0 68,7dB TUE 13/06/06 13h33m30s000 Ch. 4 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h33m22s0 68,8dB TUE 13/06/06 13h33m30s m23 33m24 33m25 33m26 33m27 33m28 33m29 33m30 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 71,7 61,2 78,1 61,1 62,1 69,0,4 78,0 Ch. 2 Leq A db 69,0 61,6 73,6 61,5 62,0 68,6,9 73,5 Ch. 3 Leq A db 68,7,8 73,0,7 61,7 68,1 71,1 72,9 Ch. 4 Leq A db 68,8 63,2 72,6 63,1 64,4 68,4,7 72,5 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h33m24s0 78,3dB TUE 13/06/06 13h33m31s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h33m24s0,6dB TUE 13/06/06 13h33m31s m25 33m26 33m27 33m28 33m29 33m30 33m31 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 78,3 64,7 87,5 64,6,9 74,4 82,5 87,4 Ch. 2 Leq A db,6 58,1,2 58,0 58,4,5 68,2,1
47 TIP4-CT Page 47 of 48 Passby3 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h36m17s0 72,5dB TUE 13/06/06 13h36m24s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h36m17s0 69,8dB TUE 13/06/06 13h36m24s0 Ch. 3 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h36m17s0 69,5dB TUE 13/06/06 13h36m24s0 Ch. 4 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h36m17s0,1dB TUE 13/06/06 13h36m24s m18 36m19 36m20 36m21 36m22 36m23 36m24 36m25 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 72,5 61,7 78,7 61,6 63,0 71,0,8 78,6 Ch. 2 Leq A db 69,8 61,9 73,5 61,8 63,2 69,8 72,3 73,4 Ch. 3 Leq A db 69,5,9 74,2,8 62,5 69,9 71,7 74,1 Ch. 4 Leq A db,1 63,9 73,2 63,8 64,6 69,3 71,9 78,0 Ch. 1 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h36m19s0 79,1dB TUE 13/06/06 13h36m26s0 Ch. 2 Leq 100ms A TUE 13/06/06 13h36m19s0 66,6dB TUE 13/06/06 13h36m26s m20 36m21 36m22 36m23 36m24 36m25 36m26 Channel Type Wght Unit Leq Lmin Lmax L99 L95 L L10 L1 Ch. 1 Leq A db 79,1,3 87,9,2,9 74,8 84,5 87,8 Ch. 2 Leq A db 66,6 58,2 69,9 58,1 59,8 66,6 68,9 69,8
48 TIP4-CT Page 48 of 48 ANNEX 2 Technical specifications of CDM s rubber barrier
Patrick Vanhonacker André Marqueteeken
TIP4-CT-2005-516420 Page 1 of 27 QCITY issued: December 29, 2008 DELIVERABLE D5.3 CONTRACT N PROJECT N ACRONYM TITLE TIP4-CT-2005-516420 FP6-516420 QCITY Quiet City Transport Subproject 5 Design & implementation
Schindler 3300 / Schindler 5300 Information on noise and vibration.
Schindler 3300 / Schindler 5300. Content Introduction 1. Ride quality Jerk Car acceleration Vertical car vibration Lateral car vibration Sound in the car 2. Sound basics 3. Vibration basics 4. Structure-borne
Trans Bay Cable Project (400 MW) Preliminary Audible Noise Study
Page 1 of 5 Preliminary Audible Noise Study Pittsburg 10 th Street, N-S Orientation Rev. Date Section Page Remarks Signature 0 17.11.06 all all first issue Page 2 of 5 1 Audible Noise Study 1.1 Basis The
BNAM 2008 BERGEN BYBANE NOISE REDUCTION BY TRACK DESIGN. Reykjavik, august 2008. Arild Brekke, Brekke & Strand akustikk as, Norway
BNAM 08 BERGEN BYBANE NOISE REDUCTION BY TRACK DESIGN Dr.ing Arild Brekke Brekke & Strand akustikk as Box 1024 Skøyen 0218 Oslo Email: [email protected] Introduction BNAM 08 A city line now is
Acoustic Terms, Definitions and General Information
Acoustic Terms, Definitions and General Information Authored by: Daniel Ziobroski Acoustic Engineer Environmental and Acoustic Engineering GE Energy Charles Powers Program Manager Environmental and Acoustic
The Effects of Ultrasonic Sound Generated by Ultrasonic Cleaning Systems on Human Hearing and Physiology
The Effects of Ultrasonic Sound Generated by Ultrasonic Cleaning Systems on Human Hearing and Physiology Questions about the effects of ultrasonic energy on hearing and other human physiology arise from
Building Design for Advanced Technology Instruments Sensitive to Acoustical Noise
Building Design for Advanced Technology Instruments Sensitive to Acoustic Noise Michael Gendreau Colin Gordon & Associates Presentation Outline! High technology research and manufacturing instruments respond
Active noise control in practice: transformer station
Active noise control in practice: transformer station Edwin Buikema 1 ; Fokke D. van der Ploeg 2 ; Jan H. Granneman 3 1, 2, 3 Peutz bv, Netherlands ABSTRACT Based on literature and extensive measurements
Bergen, Norway BNAM 2010. May 10-12. Modern passenger trains in Norway - are they as quiet as we think?
Bergen, Norway BNAM 2010 May 10-12 Modern passenger trains in Norway - are they as quiet as we think? Enno Swets Norconsult AS, Department of Acoustics, Vestfjordgaten 4 NO-1338, Norway, [email protected]
The APT-WORM (Wheel flat and Out of Roundness Monitoring) system
Low Cost Online Wheelset Condition Monitoring for Light Rail Operators Ir. Tom Vanhonacker APT - Track Products and Measurement Devices, Troonstraat 98, 16 Brussel, Belgium tel: +32 16 23 2 4 fax: +32
Noise. CIH Review PDC March 2012
Noise CIH Review PDC March 2012 Learning Objectives Understand the concept of the decibel, decibel determination, decibel addition, and weighting Know the characteristics of frequency that are relevant
Aircraft cabin noise synthesis for noise subjective analysis
Aircraft cabin noise synthesis for noise subjective analysis Bruno Arantes Caldeira da Silva Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica São José dos Campos - SP [email protected] Cristiane Aparecida Martins
As a minimum, the report must include the following sections in the given sequence:
5.2 Limits for Wind Generators and Transformer Substations In cases where the noise impact at a Point of Reception is composed of combined contributions due to the Transformer Substation as well as the
Conversion of existing road source data to use CNOSSOS-EU
Conversion of existing road source data to use CNOSSOS-EU Simon J. Shilton Acustica Ltd, Manchester, United Kingdom Fabienne Anfosso Lédée Ifsttar, Nantes, France Hans van Leeuwen DGMR, The Hague, Netherlands
Façade acoustic design strategy Proposed residential development Irvin Avenue, Saltburn
strategy Proposed residential development Report Number: 1420.1 Version: A Date: 13 th October 2008 Prepared by: Checked by: Andrew Gibson Jack Harvie-Clark Apex Acoustics Limited Design Works William
Noise impact assessment of mass rapid transit systems in Delhi city
Indian Journal of Pure & Applied Physics Vol. 49, April 2011, pp. 257-262 impact assessment of mass rapid transit systems in Delhi city Naveen Garg a, Omkar Sharma a & S Maji b a Acoustics, Ultrasonic,
INTERNATIONAL ANNEX III. Technical Details of Sound Signal Appliances
INTERNATIONAL ANNEX III Technical Details of Sound Signal Appliances 1. Whistles (a) Frequencies and range of audibility The fundamental frequency of the signal shall lie within the range 70-700 Hz. The
Sound Level Meters Nor131 & Nor132
Product Data Sound Level Meters Nor131 & Nor132 Applications Noise hazards in the workplace Prescription of hearing protection Environmental noise investigations Product noise testing Noise labeling Features
Relationship between Sound Pressure and Sound Power Levels
Relationship between Sound Pressure and Sound Power Levels 4 W. T. W. CORY Chairman of the Eurovent WG 1 Fans If we wish to know the sound power transmitted through a fan and ducting system, it is preferable
Sound Power Level determination of AEG KM880 electrically operated food preparation appliance
Sound Power Level determination of AEG KM880 electrically operated food preparation appliance CHRISTER HEED AND ANDERS SÖRENSSON 4B1150 Stockholm March 2007 Marcus Wallenberg Laboratoriet för Ljud- och
How To Reduce Noise From A Test Screen
Practical Approaches to Engineering Noise Controls Dave Yantek Mining Hearing Loss Prevention Workshop June 21-22, 22, 2005 Pittsburgh Research Laboratory Basics of sound Topics Measurement of sound Measurement
Sound Power Measurement
Sound Power Measurement A sound source will radiate different sound powers in different environments, especially at low frequencies when the wavelength is comparable to the size of the room 1. Fortunately
KRUGER ENERGY CHATHAM WIND PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING REPORT / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT. Appendix E. Environmental Noise Impact Assessment
KRUGER ENERGY CHATHAM WIND PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING REPORT / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Appendix E Environmental Noise Impact Assessment Executive Summary The purpose of this environmental
A COMPACT MODEL FOR PREDICTING ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE
Iran. J. Environ. Health. Sci. Eng., 2009, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 181-186 A COMPACT MODEL FOR PREDICTING ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE 1* R. Golmohammadi, 2 M. Abbaspour, 3 P. Nassiri, 4 H. Mahjub 1 Department of Occupational
Atmospheric Effects On Traffic Noise Propagation Behind Noise Barriers
A. A. EL-Aassar, R.L. Wayson, J. Macdonald 1 Atmospheric Effects On Traffic Noise Propagation Behind Noise Barriers A. A. EL-Aassar, R. L. Wayson, J. MacDonald University of Central Florida Community Noise
Evaluation and analysis of traffic noise from the main roads in the Trakya region of Turkey
Urban Transport 479 Evaluation and analysis of traffic noise from the main roads in the Trakya region of Turkey F. Uysal & E. Tinmaz Trakya University, Çorlu Engineering Faculty, Department of Environmental
THE STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM OF THE RION ANTIRION BRIDGE CHARILAOS TRIKOUPIS. Akis Panagis
InnoWeek on RES July 03,2013, Patras, Greece THE STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM OF THE RION ANTIRION BRIDGE CHARILAOS TRIKOUPIS Akis Panagis Monitoring engineer Gefyra S.A. INDEX 1. Introduction-Structure
ACOUSTIC PERFORMANCES OF AN HEMIANECHOIC ROOM FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY TESTS
ACOUSTIC PERFORMANCES OF AN HEMIANECHOIC ROOM FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY TESTS Franco Cotana, Federico Rossi, Andrea Nicolini Università degli Studi di Perugia, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale
SOUND LEVEL METER 94405
SOUND LEVEL METER 94405 INSTRUCTION MANUAL REC FAST A/C 1. SAFETY INFORMATION Read the following safety information carefully before attempting to operate or service the meter. Use the meter only as specified
Manual Analysis Software AFD 1201
AFD 1200 - AcoustiTube Manual Analysis Software AFD 1201 Measurement of Transmission loss acc. to Song and Bolton 1 Table of Contents Introduction - Analysis Software AFD 1201... 3 AFD 1200 - AcoustiTube
Sound absorption and acoustic surface impedance
Sound absorption and acoustic surface impedance CHRISTER HEED SD2165 Stockholm October 2008 Marcus Wallenberg Laboratoriet för Ljud- och Vibrationsforskning Sound absorption and acoustic surface impedance
User's Guide. Integrating Sound Level Datalogger. Model 407780. Introduction
User's Guide 99 Washington Street Melrose, MA 02176 Phone 781-665-1400 Toll Free 1-800-517-8431 Visit us at www.testequipmentdepot.com Back to the Extech 407780 Product Page Integrating Sound Level Datalogger
Dynamic sound source for simulating the Lombard effect in room acoustic modeling software
Dynamic sound source for simulating the Lombard effect in room acoustic modeling software Jens Holger Rindel a) Claus Lynge Christensen b) Odeon A/S, Scion-DTU, Diplomvej 381, DK-2800 Kgs. Lynby, Denmark
NoiseMeters. www.noisemeters.com. dosebadge. Monitoring Personal Noise Exposure
NoiseMeters dosebadge Monitoring Personal Noise Exposure Small size and weight with simple operation No cables or controls on the dosebadge Reduces damage and tampering Very strong construction Meets IEC
Measurement of RF Emissions from a Final Coat Electronics Corrosion Module
Engineering Test Report No. 37802-02 Rev. A Measurement of RF Emissions from a Final Coat Electronics Corrosion Module For : Canadian Auto Preservation, Inc. 390 Bradwick Drive Concord, Ontario CANADA
Fundamentals of Acoustics & Practical HVAC Design Considerations. Demir Doken Acoustic Engineer
Fundamentals of Acoustics & Practical HVAC Design Considerations Demir Doken Acoustic Engineer What is sound? Sound is a mechanical wave that is an oscillation of pressure transmitted through some medium
Difference in levels of groundborne noise and vibrations between the T-1300 and MX-3000 metro trains in Oslo
Difference in levels of groundborne noise and vibrations between the T-1300 and MX-3000 metro trains in Oslo Sigmund Olafsen Brekke & Strand akustikk, P.O.Box 1024 Hoff, NO-0218 Norway, [email protected]
Functional noise specifications for purchasing green low noise vehicles
Functional noise specifications for purchasing green low noise vehicles Filip Stenlund a) Department of Acoustics, Tyréns AB Peter Myndes Backe 16, 118 86 Stockholm, Sweden It is expected that the municipalities
RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SM.1792. Measuring sideband emissions of T-DAB and DVB-T transmitters for monitoring purposes
Rec. ITU-R SM.1792 1 RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SM.1792 Measuring sideband emissions of T-DAB and DVB-T transmitters for monitoring purposes (2007) Scope This Recommendation provides guidance to measurement
NOISE EVALUATION IN A RACE-TRACK: MEASUREMENTS, SOFTWARE ANALYSES AND NEED OF CONTINUOUS MONITORING. COMPARISON AMONG THE RESULTS.
NOISE EVALUATION IN A RACE-TRACK: MEASUREMENTS, SOFTWARE ANALYSES AND NEED OF CONTINUOUS MONITORING. COMPARISON AMONG THE RESULTS. Anna Magrini 1, Andrea Cerniglia 2, Mariagiovanna Lenti 2 and Lucia Cattani
A simple method to compute aircraft noise inside dwellings
The 33 rd International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering A simple method to compute aircraft noise inside dwellings C. Brutel-Vuilmet, M. Villot and P. Jean CSTB, 24 av Joseph Fourier,
INTERFERENCE OF SOUND WAVES
2011 Interference - 1 INTERFERENCE OF SOUND WAVES The objectives of this experiment are: To measure the wavelength, frequency, and propagation speed of ultrasonic sound waves. To observe interference phenomena
Research for High Speed. Pierre-Etienne Gautier INEXIA, Scientific Director St Denis la Plaine, France
Research for High Speed Pierre-Etienne Gautier INEXIA, Scientific Director St Denis la Plaine, France Presentation Outline Learning from the speed record (574,8 km/h=357.2 mph) Tests on Duplex trainsets
THE USE OF MEASUREMENTS & GPS FOR NOISE MAPPING. Douglas Manvell
THE USE OF MEASUREMENTS & GPS FOR NOISE MAPPING Douglas Manvell Brüel & Kjær Sound & Vibration Measurements A/S Skodsborgvej 307, 2850 Nærum [email protected] BNAM2004-1 1. INTRODUCTION The following gives
Airborne Sound Insulation
Airborne Sound Insulation with XL2-TA Sound Level Meter This application note describes the verification of the airborne sound insulation in buildings with the XL2-TA Sound Level Meter. All measurements
Kit 106. 50 Watt Audio Amplifier
Kit 106 50 Watt Audio Amplifier T his kit is based on an amazing IC amplifier module from ST Electronics, the TDA7294 It is intended for use as a high quality audio class AB amplifier in hi-fi applications
PART 5D TECHNICAL AND OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF MOBILE-SATELLITE SERVICES RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.1188
Rec. ITU-R M.1188 1 PART 5D TECHNICAL AND OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF MOBILE-SATELLITE SERVICES Rec. ITU-R M.1188 RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.1188 IMPACT OF PROPAGATION ON THE DESIGN OF NON-GSO MOBILE-SATELLITE
RF data receiver super-reactive ASK modulation, low cost and low consumption ideal for Microchip HCS KEELOQ decoder/encoder family. 0.
Receiver AC-RX2/CS RF data receiver super-reactive ASK modulation, low cost and low consumption ideal for Microchip HCS KEELOQ decoder/encoder family. Pin-out 38.1 3 Component Side 1 2 3 7 11 13 14 15
MCS 020. MCS Planning Standards. For permitted development installations of wind turbines and air source heat pumps on domestic premises
MCS 020 MCS Planning Standards For permitted development installations of wind turbines and air source heat pumps on domestic premises This Standard is the property of Department of Energy and Climate
Speaking the same language on noise exposure in Europe: the outcome of phase A of CNOSSOS-EU process
29 November 2012, Madrid Speaking the same language on noise exposure in Europe: the outcome of phase A of CNOSSOS-EU process Stylianos Kephalopoulos 1 and Marco Paviotti 2 1 European Commission, Joint
Casa da Musica, a new concert hall for Porto, Portugal
Audio Engineering Society Conference Paper Presented at the 21st Conference 22 June 1 3 St. Petersburg, Russia Casa da Musica, a new concert hall for Porto, Portugal Van Luxemburg, L.C.J 1,2, Hak, C.C.J.M
Vibration mitigation for metro line on soft clay
Bergen, Norway BNAM May - Vibration mitigation for metro line on soft clay Karin Norén-Cosgriff and Christian Madshus Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI), Sognsveien 7, 7, NO-86 Oslo, Norway, [email protected],
2011-06-13. Acoustic design with wall acoustic solutions
2011-06-13 Acoustic design with wall acoustic solutions Introduction A suspended ceiling is by far the most common acoustical treatment in a room. In most cases this is also a sufficient solution to create
RX-AM4SF Receiver. Pin-out. Connections
RX-AM4SF Receiver The super-heterodyne receiver RX-AM4SF can provide a RSSI output indicating the amplitude of the received signal: this output can be used to create a field-strength meter capable to indicate
Direct and Reflected: Understanding the Truth with Y-S 3
Direct and Reflected: Understanding the Truth with Y-S 3 -Speaker System Design Guide- December 2008 2008 Yamaha Corporation 1 Introduction Y-S 3 is a speaker system design software application. It is
Measuring Sound Insulation using Deconvolution Techniques
Measuring Sound Insulation using Deconvolution Techniques C. C. J. M. Hak a, N. H. A. M. Van Hout b and H. J. Martin c a Technische Universteit Eindhoven, De Rondom 10, 5612 AP Eindhoven, Netherlands b
Access onto roof from Center Block
2 2 Tap 4 Tank 3 3 4 5 5 6 4 1 Services PV panels Forth floor structure (later additions) Rooflights Access / Walkways Access onto roof from Center Block muf architecture/art LLP 4.3 Roof alterations and
ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE Last Revised: July 2007
QUESTION TO BE INVESTIGATED ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE Last Revised: July 2007 How can we measure the Landé g factor for the free electron in DPPH as predicted by quantum mechanics? INTRODUCTION Electron
Generic - Hearing Loop - (AFILS) U.S. System Specification
This document is a generic specification for any Hearing Loop (Audio Frequency Induction Loop System). For the remainder of the document, we will refer to using the term Hearing Loop rather than Audio
Technical data UNIBLOCK UBSF 180 625
Data TECHNICL DT Technical data UNIBLOCK UBSF 80 6 Output data Type UBSF 80 UBSF 0 UBSF 00 UBSF 6 Output power 80 kv 0 kv 00 kv 6 kv Output voltage 80/77 V 0/ V 0/ V 0/ V Output current 7 8 66 80 Power
How Noise is Generated by Wind Turbines The mechanisms of noise generation. Malcolm Hayes Hayes McKenzie Partnership Ltd Machynlleth & Salisbury
How Noise is Generated by Wind Turbines The mechanisms of noise generation Malcolm Hayes Hayes McKenzie Partnership Ltd Machynlleth & Salisbury Overview Main sources of noise from wind turbines Causes
Characterization of acoustics in open offices - four case studies
Characterization of acoustics in open offices - four case studies J. S Keränen, P. Virjonen and V. O Hongisto Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Lemminkäisenkatu 14-18 B, 5 Turku, Finland [email protected]
AUROLEX. Plug and Play Monitoring. The best ways to achieve a cleaner, safer environment
AUROLEX Plug and Play Monitoring The best ways to achieve a cleaner, safer environment R AUROLEX MONITORING SYSTEEM The flexible Aurolex Monitoring System offers users the ability to simultaneously measure
At the completion of this guide you should be comfortable with the following:
This guide provides instructions and best practices for deployment of the Yealink W52P IP DECT phones and repeaters RT10, which is intended for qualified technicians (or administrator) who will deploy
SHARING BETWEEN TERRESTRIAL FLIGHT TELEPHONE SYSTEM (TFTS) AND RADIO ASTRONOMY IN THE 1.6 GHz BAND. Paris, May 1992
European Radiocommunications Committee (ERC) within the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT) SHARING BETWEEN TERRESTRIAL FLIGHT TELEPHONE SYSTEM (TFTS) AND RADIO
DVT913 TV CHANNEL CONVERTER
Broadband Cable Networks 1(5) DVT913 TV CHANNEL CONVERTER General DVT913 is a TV Channel Converter for the DVX tend product family. It consists of an input down converter from to, a high selectivity part
Retrofit structural insulated panels (SIPs) increase sound transmission loss of existing single family houses impacted by highway noise
Baltimore, Maryland NOISE-CON 2010 2010 April 19-21 Retrofit structural insulated panels (SIPs) increase sound transmission loss of existing single family houses impacted by highway noise Scott Harvey
Rail Roughness Monitoring in the Netherlands
Rail Roughness Monitoring in the Netherlands A.H.W.M. Kuijpers M+P consulting engineers, P.O. Box 2094, 5260 CB, Vught, The Netherlands Tel.: +31 73 6589050; Fax: +31 73 6589051 [email protected] Summary
Noise associated with the ground water systems serving residential geothermal heat pumps
Noise associated with the ground water systems serving residential geothermal heat pumps Jeffrey L. FULLERTON 1 Acentech Incorporated, United States ABSTRACT Geothermal heat pumps are an energy efficient
Optiffuser. High-performance, high bandwidth lightweight 1D diffuser.
Optiffuser High-performance, high bandwidth lightweight 1D diffuser. General product information The Optiffuser comes in packs of four panels. Two positives and two negatives (see page 5) per package.
INTERFERENCE OF SOUND WAVES
1/2016 Sound 1/8 INTERFERENCE OF SOUND WAVES PURPOSE: To measure the wavelength, frequency, and propagation speed of ultrasonic sound waves and to observe interference phenomena with ultrasonic sound waves.
The Regulation is established pursuant to 3 (4) and 6 (6) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act. Chapter 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS
Health and Safety Requirements for the Working Environments Affected by Noise, Maximum Noise Limits for the Working Environments and the Noise Measurement Procedure 1 Government of the Republic Regulation
CASE STUDY. Automotive Components. Bosch Drancy, France Brake NVH Testing. Braking Systems. France. Automotive. PULSE, Transducers
CASE STUDY Bosch Drancy, France Brake NVH Testing France Automotive PULSE, Transducers The world-renowned Bosch group is a major producer of a vast range of automotive components. The company is an OEM
An extended EMC study of an electrical powertrain for transportation systems
European Association for the Development of Renewable Energies, Environment and Power Quality (EA4EPQ) International Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality (ICREPQ 12) Santiago de Compostela
What you measure is what you get? a novel approach for specifying and controlling acoustic quality of road surfaces
What you measure is what you get? a novel approach for specifying and controlling acoustic quality of road surfaces Ard Kuijpers & Wout Schwanen M+P consulting engineers, Vught, the Netherlands. Jan van
Relevant parameters for a reference test track Deliverable D1.7
RIVAS Railway Induced Vibration Abatement Solutions Collaborative project Relevant parameters for a reference test track Deliverable D1.7 Submission date: 20/08/2012 Project Coordinator: Bernd Asmussen
Position Paper. Final Draft. Good Practice Guide for Strategic Noise Mapping and the Production of Associated Data on Noise Exposure
European Commission Working Group Assessment of Exposure to Noise (WG-AEN) Position Paper Final Draft Good Practice Guide for Strategic Noise Mapping and the Production of Associated Data on Noise Exposure
COMPARISON OF METHODOLOGIES FOR CONTINU- OUS NOISE MONITORING AND AIRCRAFT DETECTION IN THE VICINITY OF AIRPORTS
COMPARISON OF METHODOLOGIES FOR CONTINU- OUS NOISE MONITORING AND AIRCRAFT DETECTION IN THE VICINITY OF AIRPORTS Alejandro Osses Vecchi Laboratory of Acoustics, Sociedad Acustical S.A., C.P. 7770563, Ñuñoa,
Displayport Extender via 2 multimode fibers LC Duplex Connector Extends Displayport Link up to 200 meters
Description Displayport combines the audio and video through an interface. It supports high resolution displays and multiple displays with a single cable, and increases the efficiency and bandwidth of
Instruction Manual Service Program ULTRA-PROG-IR
Instruction Manual Service Program ULTRA-PROG-IR Parameterizing Software for Ultrasonic Sensors with Infrared Interface Contents 1 Installation of the Software ULTRA-PROG-IR... 4 1.1 System Requirements...
SC-30 INTEGRATING SOUND LEVEL METER REAL TIME FREQUENCY ANALYZER
SC-30 INTEGRATING SOUND LEVEL METER REAL TIME FREQUENCY ANALYZER Type 1 integrating sound level meter meeting ANSI S1.4:83 (A1 :85), ANSI S1.43:97 standards. Octave band spectrum analyser 31,5 Hz 16 khz.
PAGE 2. Figure 1: Difference between PWL ins and SPL 1m
PAGE 1 Pipe noise J.H. Granneman and R.P.M. Jansen, Peutz Consulting Engineers, The Netherlands, emphasise the need for an adequate pipe noise control procedure, with reference to the design phase, insulation
Preset Counter signo 721
Most simple handling Impressive, clearly readable display in 48x48 mm Input frequency up to 60 khz Easy installation due to pluggable terminals TECHNICAL DATA GENERAL Display Height of digits Supply voltage
AP Series Autopilot System. AP-202 Data Sheet. March,2015. Chengdu Jouav Automation Tech Co.,L.t.d
AP Series Autopilot System AP-202 Data Sheet March,2015 Chengdu Jouav Automation Tech Co.,L.t.d AP-202 autopilot,from Chengdu Jouav Automation Tech Co., Ltd, provides complete professional-level flight
Comparison of predicted and measured wind farm noise levels and implications for assessments of new wind farms
Paper Number 30, Proceedings of ACOUSTICS 2011 2-4 November 2011, Gold Coast, Australia Comparison of predicted and measured wind farm noise levels and implications for assessments of new wind farms Tom
www.burntec.com User's Guide Integrating Sound Level Datalogger Model 407780
User's Guide Integrating Sound Level Datalogger Model 407780 Introduction Congratulations on your purchase of the Extech 407780 Integrating Sound Level Meter. The 407780 with programmable integrating time
INTER-NOISE 2006 3-6 DECEMBER 2006 HONOLULU, HAWAII, USA
INTER-NOISE 2006 3-6 DECEMBER 2006 HONOLULU, HAWAII, USA An effective new approach to isolate plumbing stub-outs in residential construction Jeffrey P. Kwolkoski, P.E., INCE Bd. Cert. a D. L. Adams Associates,
Distributed by TestEquity LLC 800-950-3457 http://www.testequity.com
Meters Meters Extech sound meters include all the features/functions needed for basic noise level surveys or to meet the requirements for OSHA compliance, community noise ordinances or machine noise evaluation.
Dual Laser InfraRed (IR) Thermometer
User s Manual Dual Laser InfraRed (IR) Thermometer MODEL 42511 Introduction Congratulations on your purchase of the Model 42511 IR Thermometer. This Infrared thermometer measures and displays non-contact
Dual Laser InfraRed (IR) Thermometer with Color Alert
User Manual Dual Laser InfraRed (IR) Thermometer with Color Alert MODEL 42509 Introduction Congratulations on your purchase of the Model 42509 IR Thermometer with Color Alert. This Infrared thermometer
SONAPHONE. The New Device Class for Preventive Maintenance
SONAPHONE The New Device Class for Preventive Maintenance Advantages at a glance: New applications through new processes User-friendly interface speeds up your inspection process Record ultrasonic
Antennas & Propagation. CS 6710 Spring 2010 Rajmohan Rajaraman
Antennas & Propagation CS 6710 Spring 2010 Rajmohan Rajaraman Introduction An antenna is an electrical conductor or system of conductors o Transmission - radiates electromagnetic energy into space o Reception
How To Powertrain A Car With A Hybrid Powertrain
ELECTRIFICATION OF VEHICLE DRIVE TRAIN THE DIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING CHALLENGES A3PS Conference, Vienna Dr. Frank Beste AVL List GmbH 1 Motivation for Powertrain Electrification Global Megatrends: Urbanization
1. SAFETY INFORMATION
RS-232 Sound Level Meter 72-860A INSTRUCTION MANUAL www.tenma.com 1. SAFETY INFORMATION Read the following safety information carefully before attempting to operate or service the meter. Use the meter
