National greenhouse gas inventory data for the period
|
|
|
- Domenic Craig
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 United Ntions FCCC/SBI/2012/31 Distr.: Generl 16 November 2012 Originl: English Subsidiry Body for Implementtion Thirty-seventh session Doh, 26 November to 1 December 2012 Item 3(b) of the provisionl gend Ntionl communictions from Prties included in Annex I to the Convention Report on ntionl greenhouse gs inventory dt from Prties included in Annex I to the Convention for the period Ntionl greenhouse gs inventory dt for the period Note by the secretrit* Summry All 42 Prties included in Annex I to the Convention (Annex I Prties) submitted their greenhouse gs (GHG) inventory common reporting formt (CRF) tbles nd ntionl inventory reports (NIRs) in By the dedline of 15 April, 41 sets of CRF tbles nd 36 NIRs hd been received. From 1990 to 2010, totl ggregte GHG emissions excluding emissions/removls from lnd use, lnd-use chnge nd forestry (LULUCF) for ll Annex I Prties decresed by 8.9 per cent, nd totl GHG emissions/removls including LULUCF decresed by 14.6 per cent. For Annex I Prties with economies in trnsition (Annex I EIT Prties), GHG emissions excluding nd including LULUCF decresed by 39.2 per cent nd 52.6 per cent, respectively. For Annex I non-eit Prties, GHG emissions excluding nd including LULUCF incresed by 4.9 per cent nd 4.1 per cent, respectively. Informtion in this document is bsed on ntionl GHG inventory submissions received s t 22 October At the time of publiction, the nnul review process for GHG inventories from Annex I Prties ws still ongoing, nd therefore the dt included in this document my not reflect the ltest informtion provided by Prties. The ltest inventory dt re vilble on the UNFCCC website. * This document ws submitted fter the due dte in order to tke into ccount the ltest submissions from Prties. GE
2 Contents Prgrphs Pge I. Introduction A. Mndte B. Scope of the note C. Possible ction by the Subsidiry Body for Implementtion nd the Conference of the Prties II. Sttus of reporting A. Timeliness nd completeness of submissions B. Reclcultions III. Overview of emission trends nd sources in Annex I Prties A. Totl ggregte greenhouse gs emissions B. Greenhouse gs emissions by gs C. Greenhouse gs emissions by sector D. Emissions dt for individul Annex I Prties
3 I. Introduction A. Mndte 1. The Conference of the Prties (COP), by decisions 9/CP.2, 3/CP.5 nd 18/CP.8, requested tht Prties included in Annex I to the Convention (Annex I Prties) submit ntionl inventory dt on greenhouse gs (GHG) emissions by sources nd removls by sinks by 15 April ech yer. Under the Guidelines for the technicl review of greenhouse gs inventories from Prties included in Annex I to the Convention dopted by the COP in decision 19/CP.8, the secretrit is requested 1 to prepre nnully report on GHG inventory dt submitted by Annex I Prties for considertion by the COP nd the Subsidiry Body for Implementtion (SBI). B. Scope of the note 2. This document shows the sttus of reporting of GHG inventories by Annex I Prties in 2012 (chpter II) nd provides summry of the ltest vilble dt on GHG emissions nd removls for the period (chpter III). Dt re provided for crbon dioxide (CO 2 ), methne (CH 4 ) nd nitrous oxide (N 2 O), nd for hydrofluorocrbons (HFCs), perfluorocrbons (PFCs) nd sulphur hexfluoride (SF 6 ) tken together. Dt re lso provided for totl 2 ggregte 3 GHG emissions, both including nd excluding net GHG emissions/removls from lnd use, lnd-use chnge nd forestry (LULUCF). 3. The informtion provided in this document is bsed on ntionl GHG inventory submissions received from ll 42 Annex I Prties s t 22 October At the time of publiction, the nnul review process ws still ongoing, nd therefore the dt presented here my not reflect the ltest informtion provided by Prties. The ltest GHG inventory dt re vilble on the UNFCCC website. 4 C. Possible ction by the Subsidiry Body for Implementtion nd the Conference of the Prties 4. The SBI my wish to tke note of the informtion contined in this document nd seek further guidnce from the COP, s pproprite. II. Sttus of reporting A. Timeliness nd completeness of submissions 5. In ccordnce with the UNFCCC reporting guidelines on nnul inventories, 5 Annex I Prties re required to submit nnully ntionl inventory report (NIR) nd common reporting formt (CRF) tbles contining dt from the bse yer up to two yers 1 FCCC/CP/2002/8, nnex II, prgrphs 42 nd The term totl implies tht emissions from sectors of the common reporting formt re summed; the inclusion of lnd use, lnd-use chnge nd forestry in the sum is indicted seprtely. 3 The term ggregte implies tht GHG emissions/removls re clculted s weighted sum of CO 2, CH 4, N 2 O, HFCs, PFCs nd SF 6 using the globl wrming potentils greed under the Convention. 4 < php>. 5 Updted UNFCCC reporting guidelines on nnul inventories following incorportion of the provisions of decision 14/CP.11 (FCCC/SBSTA/2006/9). 3
4 prior to the yer of submission. In 2012, ll 42 Annex I Prties provided GHG dt for ll yers from to By the due dte of 15 April, 41 sets of CRF tbles nd 36 NIRs were received, nd, within six weeks of the dedline, ll Prties hd submitted their CRF tbles nd NIRs. The dtes of the initil submissions of the CRF tbles re shown in tble 1. Tble 1 Greenhouse gs inventory submissions from Annex I Prties in 2012 Prty CRF submission dte Prty CRF submission dte Austrli 14 April 2012 Liechtenstein 13 April 2012 Austri 12 April 2012 Lithuni 13 April 2012 Belrus 14 April 2012 Luxembourg 5 April 2012 Belgium 15 April 2012 Mlt 13 April 2012 Bulgri 12 April 2012 Monco 29 Mrch 2012 Cnd 11 April 2012 Netherlnds 14 April 2012 Croti 13 April 2012 New Zelnd 12 April 2012 Czech Republic 15 April 2012 Norwy 15 April 2012 Denmrk 13 April 2012 Polnd 13 April 2012 Estoni 13 April 2012 Portugl 13 April 2012 Europen Union 13 April 2012 Romni 21 Mrch 2012 Finlnd 12 April 2012 Russin Federtion 13 April 2012 Frnce 4 April 2012 Slovki 14 April 2012 Germny 13 April 2012 Sloveni 12 April 2012 Greece 11 April 2012 Spin 17 April 2012 Hungry 14 April 2012 Sweden 26 Mrch 2012 Icelnd 14 April 2012 Switzerlnd 12 April 2012 Irelnd 13 April 2012 Turkey 14 April 2012 Itly 11 April 2012 Ukrine 13 April 2012 Jpn 12 April 2012 United Kingdom 13 April 2012 Ltvi 14 April 2012 United Sttes 13 April 2012 Abbrevition: CRF = common reporting formt. Dtes fter the submission dedline of 15 April 2012 re shown in itlics. The dte of submission of the ntionl inventory report my be different. 7. After the initil submissions, nine Prties submitted revised versions of their CRF tbles, nd 12 Prties resubmitted their NIRs. B. Reclcultions 8. In ccordnce with the UNFCCC reporting guidelines on nnul inventories, Prties should, when necessry, conduct reclcultions in order to improve the qulity of their emission estimtes nd to ensure the consistency of the time series. 9. In 2012, the reclcultions resulting from chnges in ctivity dt, emission fctors nd methodologies used hd vried impct on the 1990 GHG emissions of 41 Prties 4 6 Unless otherwise specified, bse yer dt re used insted of 1990 dt. The Prties tht my use bse yer other thn 1990, s stipulted in decisions 9/CP.2 nd 11/CP.4, lso provided dt for their respective bse yers. These Prties nd their bse yers re Bulgri (1988), Hungry (verge of ), Polnd (1988), Romni (1989) nd Sloveni (1986).
5 (tble 2). For totl ggregte GHG emissions excluding LULUCF, the chnge ws less thn 1 per cent for 32 Prties nd more thn 2 per cent for three Prties. For totl ggregte GHG emissions including LULUCF, the chnge ws less thn 1 per cent for 18 Prties nd more thn 3 per cent for 14 Prties. Tble 2 Inventory reclcultions by Annex I Prties in 2012 Prty Impct on 1990 GHG emissions excluding LULUCF (%) Impct on 1990 GHG emissions including LULUCF (%) Austrli Austri Belrus Less thn ±0.001 Less thn ±0.001 Belgium Bulgri Cnd Croti Czech Republic Denmrk Estoni Europen Union Finlnd Frnce Germny Greece Hungry Icelnd Irelnd Itly Jpn Ltvi Liechtenstein Lithuni Luxembourg Mlt Monco Netherlnds New Zelnd Norwy Polnd Portugl Romni Russin Federtion Slovki Sloveni
6 Prty Impct on 1990 GHG emissions excluding LULUCF (%) Impct on 1990 GHG emissions including LULUCF (%) Spin Sweden Switzerlnd Turkey Less thn ± Ukrine United Kingdom United Sttes Abbrevitions: GHG = greenhouse gs, LULUCF = lnd use, lnd-use chnge nd forestry. Due to technicl error in some common reporting formt (CRF) tbles, there is discrepncy between the vlues presented in this tble nd the vlues presented in the relevnt CRF tbles. 10. Tble 3 presents comprison of the estimtes of totl ggregte GHG emissions in 1990 reported in document FCCC/SBI/2011/9, contining informtion bsed on Annex I Prties 2011 GHG inventory submissions, nd those reported in the present document, bsed on Prties 2012 submissions. Tble 3 Comprison of 2012 nd 2011 estimtes of totl ggregte greenhouse gs emissions from Annex I Prties in Explntion of the difference between 2012 nd 2011 estimtes Totl ggregte GHG emissions excluding LULUCF (thousnds of Tg CO 2 eq) All Annex I Prties Aggregte impcts of inventory reclcultions by individul Annex I Prties Annex I EIT Prties Inventory reclcultions, for exmple, in the Russin Federtion, Slovki nd Ukrine Annex I non-eit Prties Inventory reclcultions, for exmple, in the United Kingdom nd the United Sttes Totl ggregte GHG emissions including LULUCF (thousnds of Tg CO 2 eq) All Annex I Prties Aggregte impcts of inventory reclcultions by individul Annex I Prties Annex I EIT Prties Inventory reclcultions, for exmple, in Lithuni, the Russin Federtion nd Slovki Annex I non-eit Prties Inventory reclcultions, for exmple, in Austrli, Frnce nd Itly Abbrevitions: EIT = economies in trnsition, GHG = greenhouse gs, LULUCF = lnd use, lnduse chnge nd forestry. 6
7 III. Overview of emission trends nd sources in Annex I Prties A. Totl ggregte greenhouse gs emissions 11. From 1990 to 2010, totl ggregte GHG emissions excluding emissions/removls from LULUCF for ll Annex I Prties decresed by 8.9 per cent, from 19,001.4 Tg 7 CO 2 eq to 17,314.9 Tg CO 2 eq (figures 1 nd 2). Totl ggregte GHG emissions including LULUCF decresed by 14.6 per cent, from 17,700.5 Tg CO 2 eq to 15,124.4 Tg CO 2 eq. Compred with 2000, GHG emissions in 2010 decresed by 2.3 per cent excluding LULUCF nd by 5.7 per cent including LULUCF. Between 2009 nd 2010, GHG emissions excluding nd including LULUCF incresed by 3.1 nd 4.1 per cent, respectively. Figure 1 Greenhouse gs emissions from Annex I Prties, 1990, 2000, 2005, 2009 nd 2010 Abbrevitions: EIT = economies in trnsition, LULUCF = lnd use, lnd-use chnge nd forestry. 7 One tergrm (Tg) equls one million tonnes. 7
8 Figure 2 Chnges in greenhouse gs emissions from Annex I Prties, Abbrevitions: EIT = economies in trnsition, LULUCF = lnd use, lnd-use chnge nd forestry. 12. For Annex I Prties with economies in trnsition (Annex I EIT Prties), GHG emissions excluding nd including LULUCF over the period decresed by 39.2 per cent nd 52.6 per cent, respectively. In the period, GHG emissions excluding LULUCF from these Prties incresed by 4.4 per cent, wheres GHG emissions including LULUCF decresed by 2.2 per cent. Between 2009 nd 2010, emissions incresed by 4.2 per cent (excluding LULUCF) nd by 5.2 per cent (including LULUCF). 13. For Annex I non-eit Prties, GHG emissions from 1990 to 2010 incresed by 4.9 per cent excluding LULUCF nd by 4.1 per cent including LULUCF. From 2000 to 2010, GHG emissions decresed by 3.9 per cent excluding LULUCF nd by 6.4 per cent including LULUCF. Compred with 2009, GHG emissions in 2010 incresed by 2.8 per cent excluding LULUCF nd by 3.8 per cent including LULUCF. 14. The chnges in totl ggregte GHG emissions over the period vried considerbly mong countries (figure 3). For emissions excluding LULUCF, Ukrine hs the lrgest decrese (58.8 per cent) nd Turkey hs the gretest increse (114.9 per cent). For emissions including LULUCF, Ltvi hs the lrgest decrese (148.1 per cent) nd gin the gretest increse occurred in Turkey (147.5 per cent). 8
9 Figure 3 Chnges in totl ggregte emissions of individul Annex I Prties, Abbrevitions: GHG = greenhouse gs, LULUCF = lnd use, lnd-use chnge nd forestry. 9
10 B. Greenhouse gs emissions by gs 15. CO 2 ccounted for the lrgest shre of totl emissions over the period , contributing 79.6 per cent in 1990 nd 81.7 per cent in CH 4 ws the second highest contributor to totl emissions (12.2 per cent in 1990 nd 11.2 per cent in 2010), followed by N 2 O. The emissions of HFCs, PFCs nd SF 6 tken together contributed less thn 2.0 per cent in both yers. 16. Figure 4 illustrtes the shre of ech GHG in totl emissions excluding LULUCF for 1990 nd 2010, nd the chnges in totl emissions of ech GHG over the period Emissions of CO 2, CH 4 nd N 2 O decresed, while emissions of HFCs, PFCs nd SF 6 tken together incresed by 8.0 per cent. Figure 4 Greenhouse gs emissions excluding LULUCF from Annex I Prties by gs, 1990 nd 2010 Abbrevition: LULUCF = lnd use, lnd-use chnge nd forestry. 17. Between 2009 nd 2010, emissions of CO 2 nd CH 4 incresed by 3.6 per cent nd 1.0 per cent, respectively, while N 2 O emissions decresed by 0.9 per cent. Emissions of HFCs, PFCs nd SF 6 tken together incresed by 7.4 per cent. C. Greenhouse gs emissions by sector 18. From 1990 to 2010, the griculture sector hd the lrgest decrese in emissions (21.8 per cent), followed by industril processes, wste nd energy. Over the sme period, net GHG removls by LULUCF incresed by 68.4 per cent, from 1,300.8 Tg CO 2 eq to 2,190.5 Tg CO 2 eq. Figure 5 shows the trends in Annex I Prties totl ggregte GHG emissions by sector. 10
11 Figure 5 Greenhouse gs emissions/removls from Annex I Prties by sector, 1990 nd 2010 Abbrevition: LULUCF = lnd use, lnd-use chnge nd forestry. The sector solvent nd other product use is not included in the figure becuse its contribution to totl emissions is very mrginl. Emissions from this sector decresed by 26.1 per cent. 19. Between 2009 nd 2010, emissions from the energy nd industril processes sectors incresed by 3.1 per cent nd 9.7 per cent, respectively. Emissions from the griculture nd wste sectors decresed by 0.6 per cent nd 0.7 per cent, respectively. Net GHG removls by LULUCF decresed by 2.9 per cent. 20. Within the energy sector, emissions from 1990 to 2010 decresed in ll subsectors, except trnsport, where emissions incresed by 11.4 per cent (figure 6). The lrgest reduction occurred in mnufcturing industries nd construction (21.5 per cent). Figure 6 Greenhouse gs emissions from Annex I Prties in the energy sector, 1990 nd
12 21. From 2009 to 2010, emissions from ll ctivities within the energy sector incresed, with emissions from mnufcturing industries nd construction hving the lrgest increse (6.8 per cent). 22. Emissions from interntionl bunkers incresed over the period (figure 7). GHG emissions incresed by 63.6 per cent for vition nd by 7.8 per cent for mrine trnsporttion. Figure 7 Greenhouse gs emissions from Annex I Prties from interntionl bunker fuels, 1990 nd Between 2009 nd 2010, emissions from vition incresed by 2.5 per cent nd emissions from mrine trnsporttion decresed by 3.1 per cent. 24. A comprison between the percentge chnges in totl ggregte emissions from 1990 to the ltest vilble yer reported in document FCCC/SBI/2011/9, bsed on Prties 2011 submissions, nd those reported in the present document, bsed on Prties 2012 submissions, is presented in tble 4. It lso provides explntions for the differences in the estimtes. 12 D. Emissions dt for individul Annex I Prties 25. Tbles 5 16 show detiled GHG dt for individul Annex I Prties. Totl ggregte GHG emissions excluding nd including emissions/removls from LULUCF re provided in tbles 5 nd 6; emissions of CO 2, CH 4 nd N 2 O (excluding nd including emissions/removls from LULUCF) in tbles 7 12; emissions of HFCs, PFCs nd SF 6 tken together in tble 13; nd emissions/removls from LULUCF in tbles Blnk cells in the tbles denote tht either dt were not vilble or nottion keys, such s NO (not occurring), NE (not estimted), NA (not pplicble), IE (included
13 elsewhere) or C (confidentil), were used to report emissions dt. Negtive vlues denote removls; positive vlues denote emissions. 27. The chnges in emissions from 1990 to 2010 were clculted using the exct (not rounded) vlues nd my differ from rtio clculted with the rounded numbers provided in the tbles. An en dsh ( ) signifies percentge chnges exceeding 10,000 per cent. Tble 4 Comprison of 2012 nd 2011 chnges in totl ggregte greenhouse gs emissions from Annex I Prties Explntion of the difference between 2012 nd 2011 estimtes Chnges in totl ggregte GHG emissions excluding LULUCF from 1990 to the ltest vilble yer (%) All Annex I Prties Combined impct of chnges for individul Annex I Prties Annex I EIT Prties Increses in emissions of most Annex I EIT Prties between 2009 nd 2010 Annex I non-eit Prties Increses in emissions between 2009 nd 2010, for exmple, in Germny, Jpn nd the United Sttes Chnges in totl ggregte GHG emissions including LULUCF from 1990 to the ltest vilble yer (%) All Annex I Prties Combined impct of chnges for individul Annex I Prties Annex I EIT Prties Increses in emissions of most Annex I EIT Prties between 2009 nd 2010 Annex I non-eit Prties Increses in emissions between 2009 nd 2010, for exmple, in Cnd, Jpn nd the United Sttes Abbrevitions: EIT = economies in trnsition, GHG = greenhouse gs, LULUCF = lnd use, lnduse chnge nd forestry. 13
14 Tble 5 Totl ggregte nthropogenic emissions of CO 2, CH 4, N 2 O, HFCs, PFCs nd SF 6 excluding emissions/removls from lnd use, lnd-use chnge nd forestry, 1990, 2000, 2005, 2009 nd 2010 Gg CO 2 equivlent Chnge from 1990 Prty to 2010 (%) Austrli Austri Belrus* Belgium Bulgri* Cnd Croti* Czech Republic* Denmrk Estoni* Europen Union b Finlnd Frnce Germny Greece Hungry* Icelnd Irelnd Itly Jpn Ltvi* Liechtenstein Lithuni* Luxembourg Mlt Monco Netherlnds New Zelnd Norwy Polnd* Portugl Romni* Russin Federtion* Slovki* Sloveni* Spin Sweden Switzerlnd Turkey c Ukrine* United Kingdom United Sttes Number of Prties showing decrese in emissions by more thn 1 per cent: 24 Number of Prties showing chnge in emissions within 1 per cent: 2 Number of Prties showing increse in emissions by more thn 1 per cent: 16 * A Prty with n economy in trnsition. Dt for the bse yer defined by decisions 9/CP.2 nd 11/CP.4 (Bulgri (1988), Hungry (verge of ), Polnd (1988), Romni (1989), Sloveni (1986)) re used for this Prty insted of 1990 dt. b Emission estimtes of the Europen Union re s reported for the EU-27 nd re reported seprtely from those of its member Sttes. c Decision 26/CP.7 invited Prties to recognize the specil circumstnces of Turkey, which plce it in sitution different from tht of other Annex I Prties. 14
15 Tble 6 Totl ggregte nthropogenic emissions of CO 2, CH 4, N 2 O, HFCs, PFCs nd SF 6 including emissions/removls from lnd use, lnd-use chnge nd forestry, 1990, 2000, 2005, 2009 nd 2010 Gg CO 2 equivlent Chnge from 1990 Prty to 2010 (%) Austrli Austri Belrus* Belgium Bulgri* Cnd Croti* Czech Republic* Denmrk Estoni* Europen Union b Finlnd Frnce Germny Greece Hungry* Icelnd Irelnd Itly Jpn Ltvi* Liechtenstein Lithuni* Luxembourg Mlt Monco Netherlnds New Zelnd Norwy Polnd* Portugl Romni* Russin Federtion* Slovki* Sloveni* Spin Sweden Switzerlnd Turkey c Ukrine* United Kingdom United Sttes Number of Prties showing decrese in emissions by more thn 1 per cent: 25 Number of Prties showing chnge in emissions within 1 per cent: 2 Number of Prties showing increse in emissions by more thn 1 per cent: 15 * A Prty with n economy in trnsition. Dt for the bse yer defined by decisions 9/CP.2 nd 11/CP.4 (Bulgri (1988), Hungry (verge of ), Polnd (1988), Romni (1989), Sloveni (1986)) re used for this Prty insted of 1990 dt. b Emission estimtes of the Europen Union re s reported for the EU-27 nd re reported seprtely from those of its member Sttes. c Decision 26/CP.7 invited Prties to recognize the specil circumstnces of Turkey, which plce it in sitution different from tht of other Annex I Prties. 15
16 Tble 7 Totl nthropogenic CO 2 emissions excluding emissions/removls from lnd use, lnd-use chnge nd forestry, 1990, 2000, 2005, 2009 nd 2010 Gg CO 2 equivlent Chnge from 1990 Prty to 2010 (%) Austrli Austri Belrus* Belgium Bulgri* Cnd Croti* Czech Republic* Denmrk Estoni* Europen Union b Finlnd Frnce Germny Greece Hungry* Icelnd Irelnd Itly Jpn Ltvi* Liechtenstein Lithuni* Luxembourg Mlt Monco Netherlnds New Zelnd Norwy Polnd* Portugl Romni* Russin Federtion* Slovki* Sloveni* Spin Sweden Switzerlnd Turkey c Ukrine* United Kingdom United Sttes Number of Prties showing decrese in emissions by more thn 1 per cent: 25 Number of Prties showing chnge in emissions within 1 per cent: 0 Number of Prties showing increse in emissions by more thn 1 per cent: 17 * A Prty with n economy in trnsition. Dt for the bse yer defined by decisions 9/CP.2 nd 11/CP.4 (Bulgri (1988), Hungry (verge of ), Polnd (1988), Romni (1989), Sloveni (1986)) re used for this Prty insted of 1990 dt. b Emission estimtes of the Europen Union re s reported for the EU-27 nd re reported seprtely from those of its member Sttes. c Decision 26/CP.7 invited Prties to recognize the specil circumstnces of Turkey, which plce it in sitution different from tht of other Annex I Prties. 16
17 Tble 8 Totl nthropogenic CO 2 emissions including emissions/removls from lnd use, lnd-use chnge nd forestry, 1990, 2000, 2005, 2009 nd 2010 Gg CO 2 equivlent Chnge from 1990 Prty to 2010 (%) Austrli Austri Belrus* Belgium Bulgri* Cnd Croti* Czech Republic* Denmrk Estoni* Europen Union b Finlnd Frnce Germny Greece Hungry* Icelnd Irelnd Itly Jpn Ltvi* Liechtenstein Lithuni* Luxembourg Mlt Monco Netherlnds New Zelnd Norwy Polnd* Portugl Romni* Russin Federtion* Slovki* Sloveni* Spin Sweden Switzerlnd Turkey c Ukrine* United Kingdom United Sttes Number of Prties showing decrese in emissions by more thn 1 per cent: 25 Number of Prties showing chnge in emissions within 1 per cent: 1 Number of Prties showing increse in emissions by more thn 1 per cent: 16 * A Prty with n economy in trnsition. Dt for the bse yer defined by decisions 9/CP.2 nd 11/CP.4 (Bulgri (1988), Hungry (verge of ), Polnd (1988), Romni (1989), Sloveni (1986)) re used for this Prty insted of 1990 dt. b Emission estimtes of the Europen Union re s reported for the EU-27 nd re reported seprtely from those of its member Sttes. c Decision 26/CP.7 invited Prties to recognize the specil circumstnces of Turkey, which plce it in sitution different from tht of other Annex I Prties. 17
18 Tble 9 Totl nthropogenic CH 4 emissions excluding emissions/removls from lnd use, lnd-use chnge nd forestry, 1990, 2000, 2005, 2009 nd 2010 Gg CO 2 equivlent Chnge from 1990 Prty to 2010 (%) Austrli Austri Belrus* Belgium Bulgri* Cnd Croti* Czech Republic* Denmrk Estoni* Europen Union b Finlnd Frnce Germny Greece Hungry* Icelnd Irelnd Itly Jpn Ltvi* Liechtenstein Lithuni* Luxembourg Mlt Monco Netherlnds New Zelnd Norwy Polnd* Portugl Romni* Russin Federtion* Slovki* Sloveni* Spin Sweden Switzerlnd Turkey c Ukrine* United Kingdom United Sttes Number of Prties showing decrese in emissions by more thn 1 per cent: 31 Number of Prties showing chnge in emissions within 1 per cent: 3 Number of Prties showing increse in emissions by more thn 1 per cent: 8 * A Prty with n economy in trnsition. Dt for the bse yer defined by decisions 9/CP.2 nd 11/CP.4 (Bulgri (1988), Hungry (verge of ), Polnd (1988), Romni (1989), Sloveni (1986)) re used for this Prty insted of 1990 dt. b Emission estimtes of the Europen Union re s reported for the EU-27 nd re reported seprtely from those of its member Sttes. c Decision 26/CP.7 invited Prties to recognize the specil circumstnces of Turkey, which plce it in sitution different from tht of other Annex I Prties. 18
19 Tble 10 Totl nthropogenic CH 4 emissions including emissions/removls from lnd use, lnd-use chnge nd forestry, 1990, 2000, 2005, 2009 nd 2010 Gg CO 2 equivlent Chnge from 1990 Prty to 2010 (%) Austrli Austri Belrus* Belgium Bulgri* Cnd Croti* Czech Republic* Denmrk Estoni* Europen Union b Finlnd Frnce Germny Greece Hungry* Icelnd Irelnd Itly Jpn Ltvi* Liechtenstein Lithuni* Luxembourg Mlt Monco Netherlnds New Zelnd Norwy Polnd* Portugl Romni* Russin Federtion* Slovki* Sloveni* Spin Sweden Switzerlnd Turkey c Ukrine* United Kingdom United Sttes Number of Prties showing decrese in emissions by more thn 1 per cent: 32 Number of Prties showing chnge in emissions within 1 per cent: 3 Number of Prties showing increse in emissions by more thn 1 per cent: 7 * A Prty with n economy in trnsition. Dt for the bse yer defined by decisions 9/CP.2 nd 11/CP.4 (Bulgri (1988), Hungry (verge of ), Polnd (1988), Romni (1989), Sloveni (1986)) re used for this Prty insted of 1990 dt. b Emission estimtes of the Europen Union re s reported for the EU-27 nd re reported seprtely from those of its member Sttes. c Decision 26/CP.7 invited Prties to recognize the specil circumstnces of Turkey, which plce it in sitution different from tht of other Annex I Prties. 19
20 Tble 11 Totl nthropogenic N 2 O excluding emissions/removls from lnd use, lnd-use chnge nd forestry, 1990, 2000, 2005, 2009 nd 2010 Gg CO 2 equivlent Chnge from 1990 Prty to 2010 (%) Austrli Austri Belrus* Belgium Bulgri* Cnd Croti* Czech Republic* Denmrk Estoni* Europen Union b Finlnd Frnce Germny Greece Hungry* Icelnd Irelnd Itly Jpn Ltvi* Liechtenstein Lithuni* Luxembourg Mlt Monco Netherlnds New Zelnd Norwy Polnd* Portugl Romni* Russin Federtion* Slovki* Sloveni* Spin Sweden Switzerlnd Turkey c Ukrine* United Kingdom United Sttes Number of Prties showing decrese in emissions by more thn 1 per cent: 35 Number of Prties showing chnge in emissions within 1 per cent: 3 Number of Prties showing increse in emissions by more thn 1 per cent: 4 * A Prty with n economy in trnsition. Dt for the bse yer defined by decisions 9/CP.2 nd 11/CP.4 (Bulgri (1988), Hungry (verge of ), Polnd (1988), Romni (1989), Sloveni (1986)) re used for this Prty insted of 1990 dt. b Emission estimtes of the Europen Union re s reported for the EU-27 nd re reported seprtely from those of its member Sttes. c Decision 26/CP.7 invited Prties to recognize the specil circumstnces of Turkey, which plce it in sitution different from tht of other Annex I Prties. 20
21 Tble 12 Totl nthropogenic N 2 O emissions including emissions/removls from lnd use, lnd-use chnge nd forestry, 1990, 2000, 2005, 2009 nd 2010 Gg CO 2 equivlent Chnge from 1990 Prty to 2010 (%) Austrli Austri Belrus* Belgium Bulgri* Cnd Croti* Czech Republic* Denmrk Estoni* Europen Union b Finlnd Frnce Germny Greece Hungry* Icelnd Irelnd Itly Jpn Ltvi* Liechtenstein Lithuni* Luxembourg Mlt Monco Netherlnds New Zelnd Norwy Polnd* Portugl Romni* Russin Federtion* Slovki* Sloveni* Spin Sweden Switzerlnd Turkey c Ukrine* United Kingdom United Sttes Number of Prties showing decrese in emissions by more thn 1 per cent: 34 Number of Prties showing chnge in emissions within 1 per cent: 3 Number of Prties showing increse in emissions by more thn 1 per cent: 5 * A Prty with n economy in trnsition. Dt for the bse yer defined by decisions 9/CP.2 nd 11/CP.4 (Bulgri (1988), Hungry (verge of ), Polnd (1988), Romni (1989), Sloveni (1986)) re used for this Prty insted of 1990 dt. b Emission estimtes of the Europen Union re s reported for the EU-27 nd re reported seprtely from those of its member Sttes. c Decision 26/CP.7 invited Prties to recognize the specil circumstnces of Turkey, which plce it in sitution different from tht of other Annex I Prties. 21
22 Tble 13 Totl ggregte nthropogenic emissions of HFCs, PFCs nd SF 6, 1990, 2000, 2005, 2009 nd 2010 Gg CO 2 equivlent Chnge from 1990 Prty to 2010 (%) Austrli Austri Belrus* Belgium Bulgri* Cnd Croti* Czech Republic* Denmrk Estoni* Europen Union b Finlnd Frnce Germny Greece Hungry* Icelnd Irelnd Itly Jpn Ltvi* Liechtenstein Lithuni* Luxembourg Mlt Monco Netherlnds New Zelnd Norwy Polnd* Portugl Romni* Russin Federtion* Slovki* Sloveni* Spin Sweden Switzerlnd Turkey c Ukrine* United Kingdom United Sttes Number of Prties showing decrese in emissions by more thn 1 per cent: 11 Number of Prties showing chnge in emissions within 1 per cent: 0 Number of Prties showing increse in emissions by more thn 1 per cent: 26 * A Prty with n economy in trnsition. Dt for the bse yer defined by decisions 9/CP.2 nd 11/CP.4 (Bulgri (1988), Hungry (verge of ), Polnd (1988), Romni (1989), Sloveni (1986)) re used for this Prty insted of 1990 dt. b Emission estimtes of the Europen Union re s reported for the EU-27 nd re reported seprtely from those of its member Sttes. c Decision 26/CP.7 invited Prties to recognize the specil circumstnces of Turkey, which plce it in sitution different from tht of other Annex I Prties. 22
23 Tble 14 Net nthropogenic CO 2 emissions nd removls from lnd use, lnd-use chnge nd forestry, 1990, 2000, 2005, 2009 nd 2010 Gg CO 2 equivlent Chnge from 1990 Prty to 2010 (%) Austrli Austri Belrus* Belgium Bulgri* Cnd Croti* Czech Republic* Denmrk Estoni* Europen Union b Finlnd Frnce Germny Greece Hungry* Icelnd Irelnd Itly Jpn Ltvi* Liechtenstein Lithuni* Luxembourg Mlt Monco Netherlnds New Zelnd Norwy Polnd* Portugl Romni* Russin Federtion* Slovki* Sloveni* Spin Sweden Switzerlnd Turkey c Ukrine* United Kingdom United Sttes Number of Prties showing decrese in emissions by more thn 1 per cent: 19 Number of Prties showing chnge in emissions within 1 per cent: 1 Number of Prties showing increse in emissions by more thn 1 per cent: 22 * A Prty with n economy in trnsition. Dt for the bse yer defined by decisions 9/CP.2 nd 11/CP.4 (Bulgri (1988), Hungry (verge of ), Polnd (1988), Romni (1989), Sloveni (1986)) re used for this Prty insted of 1990 dt. b Emission estimtes of the Europen Union re s reported for the EU-27 nd re reported seprtely from those of its member Sttes. c Decision 26/CP.7 invited Prties to recognize the specil circumstnces of Turkey, which plce it in sitution different from tht of other Annex I Prties. 23
24 Tble 15 Anthropogenic CH 4 emissions from lnd use, lnd-use chnge nd forestry, 1990, 2000, 2005, 2009 nd 2010 Gg CO 2 equivlent Chnge from 1990 Prty to 2010 (%) Austrli Austri Belrus* Belgium Bulgri* Cnd Croti* Czech Republic* Denmrk Estoni* Europen Union b Finlnd Frnce Germny Greece Hungry* Icelnd Irelnd Itly Jpn Ltvi* Liechtenstein Lithuni* Luxembourg Mlt Monco Netherlnds New Zelnd Norwy Polnd* Portugl Romni* Russin Federtion* Slovki* Sloveni* Spin Sweden Switzerlnd Turkey c Ukrine* United Kingdom United Sttes Number of Prties showing decrese in emissions by more thn 1 per cent: 18 Number of Prties showing chnge in emissions within 1 per cent: 0 Number of Prties showing increse in emissions by more thn 1 per cent: 17 * A Prty with n economy in trnsition. Dt for the bse yer defined by decisions 9/CP.2 nd 11/CP.4 (Bulgri (1988), Hungry (verge of ), Polnd (1988), Romni (1989), Sloveni (1986)) re used for this Prty insted of 1990 dt. b Emission estimtes of the Europen Union re s reported for the EU-27 nd re reported seprtely from those of its member Sttes. c Decision 26/CP.7 invited Prties to recognize the specil circumstnces of Turkey, which plce it in sitution different from tht of other Annex I Prties. 24
25 Tble 16 Anthropogenic N 2 O emissions from lnd use, lnd-use chnge nd forestry, 1990, 2000, 2005, 2009 nd 2010 Gg CO 2 equivlent Chnge from 1990 Prty to 2010 (%) Austrli Austri Belrus* Belgium Bulgri* Cnd Croti* Czech Republic* Denmrk Estoni* Europen Union b Finlnd Frnce Germny Greece Hungry* Icelnd Irelnd Itly Jpn Ltvi* Liechtenstein Lithuni* Luxembourg Mlt Monco Netherlnds New Zelnd Norwy Polnd* Portugl Romni* Russin Federtion* Slovki* Sloveni* Spin Sweden Switzerlnd Turkey c Ukrine* United Kingdom United Sttes Number of Prties showing decrese in emissions by more thn 1 per cent: 21 Number of Prties showing chnge in emissions within 1 per cent: 1 Number of Prties showing increse in emissions by more thn 1 per cent: 17 * A Prty with n economy in trnsition. Dt for the bse yer defined by decisions 9/CP.2 nd 11/CP.4 (Bulgri (1988), Hungry (verge of ), Polnd (1988), Romni (1989), Sloveni (1986)) re used for this Prty insted of 1990 dt. b Emission estimtes of the Europen Union re s reported for the EU-27 nd re reported seprtely from those of its member Sttes. c Decision 26/CP.7 invited Prties to recognize the specil circumstnces of Turkey, which plce it in sitution different from tht of other Annex I Prties. 25
2006 IPCC Software for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Application and use for India
2006 IPCC Softwre for Ntionl Greenhouse Gs Inventories: Appliction nd use for Indi Presenttion for NGGIP Side Event Bonn, June 8, 2013 Prof. Amit Grg ([email protected]), INDIA GHG Inventory Softwre
DlNBVRGH + Sickness Absence Monitoring Report. Executive of the Council. Purpose of report
DlNBVRGH + + THE CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL Sickness Absence Monitoring Report Executive of the Council 8fh My 4 I.I...3 Purpose of report This report quntifies the mount of working time lost s result of
Occasional Paper series
Occsionl Pper series No 134 / JUNE 2012 REVISITING THE EFFECTIVE EXCHANGE RATES OF THE EURO by Mrtin Schmitz, Mrten De Clercq, Michel Fidor, Berndette Luro nd Cristin Pinheiro OCCASIONAL PAPER SERIES
Operations with Polynomials
38 Chpter P Prerequisites P.4 Opertions with Polynomils Wht you should lern: Write polynomils in stndrd form nd identify the leding coefficients nd degrees of polynomils Add nd subtrct polynomils Multiply
A New Data Set of Educational Attainment in the World, 1950 2010 *
A New Dt Set of Eductionl Attinment in the World, 1950 2010 * Robert J. Brro + Hrvrd University nd Jong-Wh Lee Kore University Revised: November 2011 * We re grteful to UNESCO Institute for Sttistics for
Binary Representation of Numbers Autar Kaw
Binry Representtion of Numbers Autr Kw After reding this chpter, you should be ble to: 1. convert bse- rel number to its binry representtion,. convert binry number to n equivlent bse- number. In everydy
STATUS OF LAND-BASED WIND ENERGY DEVELOPMENT IN GERMANY
Yer STATUS OF LAND-BASED WIND ENERGY Deutsche WindGurd GmbH - Oldenburger Strße 65-26316 Vrel - Germny +49 (4451)/9515 - [email protected] - www.windgurd.com Annul Added Cpcity [MW] Cumultive Cpcity [MW]
Overview of International Roaming (WORLD WING)
Overses Use Overview of Interntionl Roming (WORLD WING)... 306 Services Aville Overses... 306 Checking efore Using Overses... 307 Mking Clls Overses... 309 Receiving Clls Overses... 312 Setting Network
Exponential and Logarithmic Functions
Nme Chpter Eponentil nd Logrithmic Functions Section. Eponentil Functions nd Their Grphs Objective: In this lesson ou lerned how to recognize, evlute, nd grph eponentil functions. Importnt Vocbulr Define
Treatment Spring Late Summer Fall 0.10 5.56 3.85 0.61 6.97 3.01 1.91 3.01 2.13 2.99 5.33 2.50 1.06 3.53 6.10 Mean = 1.33 Mean = 4.88 Mean = 3.
The nlysis of vrince (ANOVA) Although the t-test is one of the most commonly used sttisticl hypothesis tests, it hs limittions. The mjor limittion is tht the t-test cn be used to compre the mens of only
Global Health Matters
Globl Helth Mtters This rticle by Boldo et l. demonstrtes tht in Europe, exposure to environmentl tobcco smoke (ETS) cused n estimted 24% to 32% of sudden infnt deth syndrome (SIDS) cses nd incresed the
Enterprise Risk Management Software Buyer s Guide
Enterprise Risk Mngement Softwre Buyer s Guide 1. Wht is Enterprise Risk Mngement? 2. Gols of n ERM Progrm 3. Why Implement ERM 4. Steps to Implementing Successful ERM Progrm 5. Key Performnce Indictors
European Convention on Certain International Aspects of Bankruptcy
Europen Trety Series - No. 136 Europen Convention on Certin Interntionl Aspects of Bnkruptcy Istnul, 5.VI.1990 Premle The memer Sttes of the Council of Europe, signtories hereto, Considering tht the im
The International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam. Release on the Ionization Constant of H 2 O
The Interntionl Assocition for the Properties of Wter nd Stem Lucerne, Sitzerlnd August 7 Relese on the Ioniztion Constnt of H O 7 The Interntionl Assocition for the Properties of Wter nd Stem Publiction
An Undergraduate Curriculum Evaluation with the Analytic Hierarchy Process
An Undergrdute Curriculum Evlution with the Anlytic Hierrchy Process Les Frir Jessic O. Mtson Jck E. Mtson Deprtment of Industril Engineering P.O. Box 870288 University of Albm Tuscloos, AL. 35487 Abstrct
2001 Attachment Sequence No. 118
Form Deprtment of the Tresury Internl Revenue Service Importnt: Return of U.S. Persons With Respect to Certin Foreign Prtnerships Attch to your tx return. See seprte instructions. Informtion furnished
Report of the Conference of the Parties on its nineteenth session, held in Warsaw from 11 to 23 November 2013
United Nations FCCC/CP/2013/10/Add.3 Distr.: General 31 January 2014 Original: English Conference of the Parties Contents Report of the Conference of the Parties on its nineteenth session, held in Warsaw
Health insurance marketplace What to expect in 2014
Helth insurnce mrketplce Wht to expect in 2014 33096VAEENBVA 06/13 The bsics of the mrketplce As prt of the Affordble Cre Act (ACA or helth cre reform lw), strting in 2014 ALL Americns must hve minimum
Health insurance exchanges What to expect in 2014
Helth insurnce exchnges Wht to expect in 2014 33096CAEENABC 11/12 The bsics of exchnges As prt of the Affordble Cre Act (ACA or helth cre reform lw), strting in 2014 ALL Americns must hve minimum mount
Health insurance exchanges What to expect in 2014
Helth insurnce exchnges Wht to expect in 2014 33096CAEENABC 02/13 The bsics of exchnges As prt of the Affordble Cre Act (ACA or helth cre reform lw), strting in 2014 ALL Americns must hve minimum mount
Guide to Reading Your Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Statement
Guide to Reding Your Morgn Stnley Smith Brney Sttement Your Morgn Stnley Smith Brney ( MSSB ) ccount sttement is vluble nd, powerful resource tht provides you with the informtion you need to prtner with
JaERM Software-as-a-Solution Package
JERM Softwre-s--Solution Pckge Enterprise Risk Mngement ( ERM ) Public listed compnies nd orgnistions providing finncil services re required by Monetry Authority of Singpore ( MAS ) nd/or Singpore Stock
persons withdrawing from addiction is given by summarizing over individuals with different ages and numbers of years of addiction remaining:
COST- BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF NARCOTIC ADDICTION TREATMENT PROGRAMS with Specil Reference to Age Irving Leveson,l New York City Plnning Commission Introduction Efforts to del with consequences of poverty,
Polynomial Functions. Polynomial functions in one variable can be written in expanded form as ( )
Polynomil Functions Polynomil functions in one vrible cn be written in expnded form s n n 1 n 2 2 f x = x + x + x + + x + x+ n n 1 n 2 2 1 0 Exmples of polynomils in expnded form re nd 3 8 7 4 = 5 4 +
FUNDING OF GROUP LIFE INSURANCE
TRANSACTIONS OF SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES 1955 VOL. 7 NO. 18 FUNDING OF GROUP LIFE INSURANCE CHARLES L. TROWBRIDGE INTRODUCTION T RADITIONALLY the group life insurnce benefit hs been finnced on yerly renewble
c. Values in statements are broken down by fiscal years; many projects are
Lecture 18: Finncil Mngement (Continued)/Csh Flow CEE 498 Construction Project Mngement L Schedules A. Schedule.of Contrcts Completed See Attchment # 1 ll. 1. Revenues Erned 2. Cost of Revenues 3. Gross
Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company University of Southern California Custom Premier PPO 800/20%/20%
Anthem Blue Cross Life nd Helth Insurnce Compny University of Southern Cliforni Custom Premier 800/20%/20% Summry of Benefits nd Coverge: Wht this Pln Covers & Wht it Costs Coverge Period: 01/01/2015-12/31/2015
The Economic Footprint of Michigan s Fifteen Public Universities
December 10, 2013 The Economic Footprint of Michign s Fifteen Public Universities Prepred by: Json Horwitz Smnth Superstine Commissioned by: Presidents Council, Stte Universities of Michign Anderson Economic
Active & Retiree Plan: Trustees of the Milwaukee Roofers Health Fund Coverage Period: 06/01/2015-05/31/2016 Summary of Benefits and Coverage:
Summry of Benefits nd Coverge: Wht this Pln Covers & Wht it Costs Coverge for: Single & Fmily Pln Type: NPOS This is only summry. If you wnt more detil bout your coverge nd costs, you cn get the complete
Why is the NSW prison population falling?
NSW Bureu of Crime Sttistics nd Reserch Bureu Brief Issue pper no. 80 September 2012 Why is the NSW prison popultion flling? Jcqueline Fitzgerld & Simon Corben 1 Aim: After stedily incresing for more thn
ClearPeaks Customer Care Guide. Business as Usual (BaU) Services Peace of mind for your BI Investment
ClerPeks Customer Cre Guide Business s Usul (BU) Services Pece of mind for your BI Investment ClerPeks Customer Cre Business s Usul Services Tble of Contents 1. Overview...3 Benefits of Choosing ClerPeks
Basic Analysis of Autarky and Free Trade Models
Bsic Anlysis of Autrky nd Free Trde Models AUTARKY Autrky condition in prticulr commodity mrket refers to sitution in which country does not engge in ny trde in tht commodity with other countries. Consequently
Structuring. Your Business a Brazilian or in Brazil
Setting Up Your Compny nd Office in Brzil MOBILITY Mgzine, April 2007 As the B in BRIC, Brzil hs been gining gret del of ttention on the globl business front, with mny compnies investigting how to get
Space Vector Pulse Width Modulation Based Induction Motor with V/F Control
Interntionl Journl of Science nd Reserch (IJSR) Spce Vector Pulse Width Modultion Bsed Induction Motor with V/F Control Vikrmrjn Jmbulingm Electricl nd Electronics Engineering, VIT University, Indi Abstrct:
Graphs on Logarithmic and Semilogarithmic Paper
0CH_PHClter_TMSETE_ 3//00 :3 PM Pge Grphs on Logrithmic nd Semilogrithmic Pper OBJECTIVES When ou hve completed this chpter, ou should be ble to: Mke grphs on logrithmic nd semilogrithmic pper. Grph empiricl
Asian Development Bank Institute. ADBI Working Paper Series
ADBI Working Pper Series Rel Estte Vlution, Current Account, nd Credit Growth Ptterns Before nd After the 2008 2009 Crisis Joshu Aizenmn nd Yothin Jinjrk No. 429 July 2013 Asin Development Bnk Institute
Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model of International Trade
Lbor Productivity nd omrtive Advntge: The Ricrdin Model of Interntionl Trde Model of trde with simle (unrelistic) ssumtions. Among them: erfect cometition; one reresenttive consumer; no trnsction costs,
Threshold Population Levels for Rural Retail Businesses in North Dakota, 2000
Agribusiness & Applied Economics Miscellneous Report No. 191 July 2002 Threshold Popultion Levels for Rurl Retil Businesses in North Dkot, 2000 Rndl C. Coon nd F. Lrry Leistritz Deprtment of Agribusiness
Quick Reference Guide: One-time Account Update
Quick Reference Guide: One-time Account Updte How to complete The Quick Reference Guide shows wht existing SingPss users need to do when logging in to the enhnced SingPss service for the first time. 1)
Six greenhouse gases covered by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and its Kyoto Protocol are:
Fact sheet: The need for mitigation United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Along with adaptation, mitigation is one of the two central approaches in the international climate change process.
Reasoning to Solve Equations and Inequalities
Lesson4 Resoning to Solve Equtions nd Inequlities In erlier work in this unit, you modeled situtions with severl vriles nd equtions. For exmple, suppose you were given usiness plns for concert showing
Lump-Sum Distributions at Job Change, p. 2
Jnury 2009 Vol. 30, No. 1 Lump-Sum Distributions t Job Chnge, p. 2 E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y Lump-Sum Distributions t Job Chnge GROWING NUMBER OF WORKERS FACED WITH ASSET DECISIONS AT JOB CHANGE:
9 CONTINUOUS DISTRIBUTIONS
9 CONTINUOUS DISTIBUTIONS A rndom vrible whose vlue my fll nywhere in rnge of vlues is continuous rndom vrible nd will be ssocited with some continuous distribution. Continuous distributions re to discrete
Small Businesses Decisions to Offer Health Insurance to Employees
Smll Businesses Decisions to Offer Helth Insurnce to Employees Ctherine McLughlin nd Adm Swinurn, June 2014 Employer-sponsored helth insurnce (ESI) is the dominnt source of coverge for nonelderly dults
NQF Level: 2 US No: 7480
NQF Level: 2 US No: 7480 Assessment Guide Primry Agriculture Rtionl nd irrtionl numers nd numer systems Assessor:.......................................... Workplce / Compny:.................................
Economics Letters 65 (1999) 9 15. macroeconomists. a b, Ruth A. Judson, Ann L. Owen. Received 11 December 1998; accepted 12 May 1999
Economics Letters 65 (1999) 9 15 Estimting dynmic pnel dt models: guide for q mcroeconomists b, * Ruth A. Judson, Ann L. Owen Federl Reserve Bord of Governors, 0th & C Sts., N.W. Wshington, D.C. 0551,
GAO IRS AUDIT RATES. Rate for Individual Taxpayers Has Declined But Effect on Compliance Is Unknown
GAO United Sttes Generl Accounting Office Report to the Chirmn, Subcommittee on Oversight, Committee on Wys nd Mens, House of Representtives April 2001 IRS AUDIT RATES Rte for Individul Txpyers Hs Declined
Utilization of Smoking Cessation Benefits in Medicaid Managed Care, 2009-2013
Utiliztion of Smoking Cesstion Benefits in Medicid Mnged Cre, 2009-2013 Office of Qulity nd Ptient Sfety New York Stte Deprtment of Helth Jnury 2015 Introduction According to the New York Stte Tocco Control
Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Building and Operating Electric Power Plants in the Upper Colorado River Basin
Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 3194-3200 Greenhouse Gs Emissions from Building nd Operting Electric Power Plnts in the Upper Colordo River Bsin SERGIO PACCA AND ARPAD HORVATH*, Energy nd Resources Group,
Comprehensive emissions per capita for industrialised countries
THE AUSTRALIA INSTITUTE Comprehensive emissions per capita for industrialised countries Hal Turton and Clive Hamilton The Australia Institute September 2001 the Parties included in Annex I shall implement
The Velocity Factor of an Insulated Two-Wire Transmission Line
The Velocity Fctor of n Insulted Two-Wire Trnsmission Line Problem Kirk T. McDonld Joseph Henry Lbortories, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 Mrch 7, 008 Estimte the velocity fctor F = v/c nd the
Fact sheet: The Kyoto Protocol
Fact sheet: The Kyoto Protocol The Kyoto Protocol was adopted at the third Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC (COP 3) in Kyoto, Japan, on 11 December 1997. The Protocol shares the objective and institutions
Lecture 3 Gaussian Probability Distribution
Lecture 3 Gussin Probbility Distribution Introduction l Gussin probbility distribution is perhps the most used distribution in ll of science. u lso clled bell shped curve or norml distribution l Unlike
Factoring Polynomials
Fctoring Polynomils Some definitions (not necessrily ll for secondry school mthemtics): A polynomil is the sum of one or more terms, in which ech term consists of product of constnt nd one or more vribles
MATH 150 HOMEWORK 4 SOLUTIONS
MATH 150 HOMEWORK 4 SOLUTIONS Section 1.8 Show tht the product of two of the numbers 65 1000 8 2001 + 3 177, 79 1212 9 2399 + 2 2001, nd 24 4493 5 8192 + 7 1777 is nonnegtive. Is your proof constructive
2015 EDITION. AVMA Report on Veterinary Compensation
2015 EDITION AVMA Report on Veterinry Compenstion AVMA Report on Veterinry Compenstion 2015 EDITION Copyright 2015 by the All rights reserved. ISBN-13: 978-1-882691-31-9 AVMA Report on Veterinry Compenstion
According to Webster s, the
dt modeling Universl Dt Models nd P tterns By Len Silversn According Webster s, term universl cn be defined s generlly pplicble s well s pplying whole. There re some very common ptterns tht cn be generlly
Numeracy across the Curriculum in Key Stages 3 and 4. Helpful advice and suggested resources from the Leicestershire Secondary Mathematics Team
Numercy cross the Curriculum in Key Stges 3 nd 4 Helpful dvice nd suggested resources from the Leicestershire Secondry Mthemtics Tem 1 Contents pge The development of whole school policy 3 A definition
AN ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS METHODOLOGY TO EVALUATE IT SOLUTIONS FOR ORGANIZATIONS
AN ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS METHODOLOGY TO EVALUATE IT SOLUTIONS FOR ORGANIZATIONS Spiros Vsilkos (), Chrysostomos D. Stylios (),(b), John Groflkis (c) () Dept. of Telemtics Center, Computer Technology
Industry and Country Effects in International Stock Returns
Industry nd Country ffects in Interntionl Stock Returns Implictions for sset lloction. Steven L. Heston nd K. Geert Rouwenhorst STVN L. HSTON is ssistnt professor of finnce t the John M. Olin School of
Helicopter Theme and Variations
Helicopter Theme nd Vritions Or, Some Experimentl Designs Employing Pper Helicopters Some possible explntory vribles re: Who drops the helicopter The length of the rotor bldes The height from which the
Unit 29: Inference for Two-Way Tables
Unit 29: Inference for Two-Wy Tbles Prerequisites Unit 13, Two-Wy Tbles is prerequisite for this unit. In ddition, students need some bckground in significnce tests, which ws introduced in Unit 25. Additionl
Vendor Rating for Service Desk Selection
Vendor Presented By DATE Using the scores of 0, 1, 2, or 3, plese rte the vendor's presenttion on how well they demonstrted the functionl requirements in the res below. Also consider how efficient nd functionl
Rate and Activation Energy of the Iodination of Acetone
nd Activtion Energ of the Iodintion of Acetone rl N. eer Dte of Eperiment: //00 Florence F. Ls (prtner) Abstrct: The rte, rte lw nd ctivtion energ of the iodintion of cetone re detered b observing the
S a l e s Ta x, U s e Ta x, I n c o m e Ta x W i t h h o l d i n g a n d M i c h i g a n B u s i n e s s Ta x E s t i m a t e s
78 (Rev. 8-08) S l e s T x, U s e T x, I n c o m e T x W i t h h o l d i n g n d M i c h i g n B u s i n e s s T x E s t i m t e s Forms nd Instructions Cll (517) 636-4730 or visit Tresury s Web site t
Project 6 Aircraft static stability and control
Project 6 Aircrft sttic stbility nd control The min objective of the project No. 6 is to compute the chrcteristics of the ircrft sttic stbility nd control chrcteristics in the pitch nd roll chnnel. The
MAX. As an increasingly larger share of Medicaid enrollees MEDICAID POLICY BRIEF
MAX CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES MEDICAID POLICY BRIEF Brief 14 December 2012 The Avilbility nd Usbility of Behviorl Helth Orgniztion Encounter Dt in MAX 2009 Jessic Nysenbum, Ellen Bouchery,
15.6. The mean value and the root-mean-square value of a function. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes. Learning Style
The men vlue nd the root-men-squre vlue of function 5.6 Introduction Currents nd voltges often vry with time nd engineers my wish to know the verge vlue of such current or voltge over some prticulr time
FCCC/SBI/ICA/2015/TASR.1/KOR
United Nations FCCC/SBI/ICA/2015/TASR.1/KOR Distr.: General 10 February 2016 English only Summary report on the technical analysis of the first biennial update report of the Republic of Korea submitted
Use Geometry Expressions to create a more complex locus of points. Find evidence for equivalence using Geometry Expressions.
Lerning Objectives Loci nd Conics Lesson 3: The Ellipse Level: Preclculus Time required: 120 minutes In this lesson, students will generlize their knowledge of the circle to the ellipse. The prmetric nd
The Morgan Stanley FTSE Protected Growth Plan. Investor Pack
The Morgn Stnley FTSE Protected Growth Pln Investor Pck The Morgn Stnley FTSE Protected Growth Pln Introduction The current investment environment with its extreme levels of uncertinty nd voltility, mkes
Example 27.1 Draw a Venn diagram to show the relationship between counting numbers, whole numbers, integers, and rational numbers.
2 Rtionl Numbers Integers such s 5 were importnt when solving the eqution x+5 = 0. In similr wy, frctions re importnt for solving equtions like 2x = 1. Wht bout equtions like 2x + 1 = 0? Equtions of this
COMPLEX FRACTIONS. section. Simplifying Complex Fractions
58 (6-6) Chpter 6 Rtionl Epressions undles tht they cn ttch while working together for 0 hours. 00 600 6 FIGURE FOR EXERCISE 9 95. Selling. George sells one gzine suscription every 0 inutes, wheres Theres
Waste Management 32 (2012) 1019 1030. Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect. Waste Management
Wste Mngement 32 (2012) 1019 1030 Contents lists vilble t SciVerse ScienceDirect Wste Mngement journl homepge: www.elsevier.com/locte/wsmn The environmentl comprison of lndfilling vs. incinertion of MSW
Submission by Norway to the ADP
Submission by Norway to the ADP Norway s Intended Nationally Determined Contribution 1. Introduction Norway is fully committed to the UNFCCC negotiation process towards adopting at COP21 a protocol, another
Data replication in mobile computing
Technicl Report, My 2010 Dt repliction in mobile computing Bchelor s Thesis in Electricl Engineering Rodrigo Christovm Pmplon HALMSTAD UNIVERSITY, IDE SCHOOL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, COMPUTER AND ELECTRICAL
abcdefghijklmnopqrstu
NHS Circulr: PCS(AFC)2008/2 The Scottish Government Helth Workforce Directorte Employment nd Retention Division bcdefghijklmnopqrstu Der Collegue MANAGING SICKNESS ABSENCE Summry 1. This py circulr informs
Answer, Key Homework 10 David McIntyre 1
Answer, Key Homework 10 Dvid McIntyre 1 This print-out should hve 22 questions, check tht it is complete. Multiple-choice questions my continue on the next column or pge: find ll choices efore mking your
Test Management using Telelogic DOORS. Francisco López Telelogic DOORS Specialist
Test Mngement using Telelogic DOORS Frncisco López Telelogic DOORS Specilist Introduction Telelogic solution for Requirements Mngement DOORS Requirements mngement nd trcebility pltform for complex systems
1. In the Bohr model, compare the magnitudes of the electron s kinetic and potential energies in orbit. What does this imply?
Assignment 3: Bohr s model nd lser fundmentls 1. In the Bohr model, compre the mgnitudes of the electron s kinetic nd potentil energies in orit. Wht does this imply? When n electron moves in n orit, the
Engineer-to-Engineer Note
Engineer-to-Engineer Note EE-220 Technicl notes on using Anlog Devices DSPs, processors nd development tools Contct our technicl support t [email protected] nd t [email protected] Or visit our
P.3 Polynomials and Factoring. P.3 an 1. Polynomial STUDY TIP. Example 1 Writing Polynomials in Standard Form. What you should learn
33337_0P03.qp 2/27/06 24 9:3 AM Chpter P Pge 24 Prerequisites P.3 Polynomils nd Fctoring Wht you should lern Polynomils An lgeric epression is collection of vriles nd rel numers. The most common type of
Data quality issues for accounting information systems implementation: Systems, stakeholders, and organizational factors
Journl of Technology Reserch Dt qulity issues for ccounting informtion systems implementtion: Systems, stkeholders, nd orgniztionl fctors ABSTRACT Hongjing Xu Butler University Qulity informtion is one
GAO HOME MORTGAGE INTEREST DEDUCTION. Despite Challenges Presented by Complex Tax Rules, IRS Could Enhance Enforcement and Guidance
GAO United Sttes Government Accountbility Office Report to the Joint Committee on Txtion July 2009 HOME MORTGAGE INTEREST DEDUCTION Despite Chllenges Presented by Complex Tx Rules, IRS Could Enhnce Enforcement
PROF. BOYAN KOSTADINOV NEW YORK CITY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY, CUNY
MAT 0630 INTERNET RESOURCES, REVIEW OF CONCEPTS AND COMMON MISTAKES PROF. BOYAN KOSTADINOV NEW YORK CITY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY, CUNY Contents 1. ACT Compss Prctice Tests 1 2. Common Mistkes 2 3. Distributive
NOTES. Cohasset Associates, Inc. 2015 Managing Electronic Records Conference 8.1
Cohsset Assocites, Inc. Expnding Your Skill Set: How to Apply the Right Serch Methods to Your Big Dt Problems Juli L. Brickell H5 Generl Counsel MER Conference My 18, 2015 H5 POWERING YOUR DISCOVERY GLOBALLY
How To Network A Smll Business
Why network is n essentil productivity tool for ny smll business Effective technology is essentil for smll businesses looking to increse the productivity of their people nd processes. Introducing technology
Quantifying the Impoverishing Effects of Purchasing Medicines: A Cross-Country Comparison of the Affordability of Medicines in the Developing World
Quntifying the Impoverishing Effects of Purchsing Medicines: A Cross-Country Comprison of the Affordbility of Medicines in the Developing World Lurens M. Niëns 1 *, Alexndr Cmeron 2, Ellen Vn de Poel 1,
Waste-to-energy. by Ronald G Harley, Xicon Infrastructure
Wste-to-energy by Ronld G Hrley, Xicon Infrstructure This pper introduces the concepts behind municipl wste mngement, nd then gives more detils of the wste-to-energy process in prticulr. It compres the
Combined Liability Insurance. Information and Communication Technology Proposal form
Comined Liility Insurnce Informtion nd Communiction Technology Proposl form Comined Liility Insurnce Informtion nd Communiction Technology - Proposl form This proposl form must e completed nd signed y
Pre-Approval Application
Pre-Approvl Appliction In tody s rel estte mrket, Pre-Approved mortgge provides you the buyer with powerful tool in the home purchse process! Once you hve received your Pre-Approvl, you cn shop for your
