Input Data Quality Report
|
|
- Barnaby Beasley
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Input Data Quality Report Review of Targe Creek - Sutherland PEM IDQ Report Submitted to the Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management By David E. Moon, CDT Core Decision Technologies Inc.
2
3 0. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND RATIONALE FOR THE REVIEW SCOPE OF THE REVIEW ORGANIZATION OF THE REVIEW Introduction The review proper Conclusions ELEMENTS OF THE REVIEW Organization and Presentation Field Sampling and Field Data Input Data Layers... 3 Compilation Metadata...3 Spatial Quality of Input Data...4 Thematic Data Input Quality...4 Thematic Compilation and Derivation Knowledge Base REVIEW ORGANIZATION AND PRESENTATION FIELD SAMPLING AND FIELD DATA INPUT DATA LAYERS Input Data Sources... 8 Compilation Metadata for Input Maps...8 Spatial Quality of Input Maps...8 Thematic Quality of Input Maps Input Data Derivation / Compilation... 9 Quality Control / Quality Assurance...9 Attribute Metadata Input Data Summary Report KNOWLEDGE BASE AND ALGORITHM REQUIREMENTS Entities Knowledge Base Attribute Compilation...12 Cross Product Resolution...12 Sliver adjustment Belief Matrices...12 Sensitivity Analysis Knowledge Base Validation...12 Test Description...12 Test Results CONCLUSIONS...13 I
4 0. Executive summary It must be noted that the Input Data Quality standards put forth in the Predictive Ecosystem Mapping Inventory Standard were, by design, non-prescriptive and flexible enough for PEM practitioners to meet the intent of the standard without being forced to follow rigid formats, formulas, or procedures. The hope was that the standard would encourage critical evaluation of input data by PEM practitioners and encourage its reporting in a clear, concise, and complete manner. It is therefore difficult to provide a pass/fail evaluation for IDQ reports. In addition, the Targe Creek Sutherland IDQ report was conducted as a test of the PEM Inventory Standard and so does not represent a typical PEM IDQ report. It should, however, incorporate both the letter and the intent of PEM Inventory Standard. The report comes closest to meeting the letter of the PEM Inventory Standard for Input Data Quality Reporting but does not meet the intent. 1. Documentation of metadata for the input data layers was incomplete. While not required in the standard, the history or pedigree of Forest Cover map revisions, base map conversion, and retrofit procedures was ignored. The report gives UTM as the TRIM projection when the data is distributed in Albers. The conversion from Albers to UTM is not reported. 2. Documentation of the attribute extraction/derivation procedures was incomplete. 3. Documentation of quality control and quality assurance was inadequate and while the use of field plots established to support development of the knowledge base as a test for the quality of primary or derived input data was commendable, the lack of documentation on sampling strategy and design, the lack of documentation on attribute derivation and extraction procedures, the lack of documentation on the nature of mapping entities, map entities (spatial accuracy and thematic resolution and accuracy) limited the utility of the information. 4. Despite relatively high error values in those attributes tested against field data, there was no discussion of the sensitivity of ecosystem prediction to errors in the input data. Failure to provide a simple error analysis identifying the impact of individual and cumulative attribute errors on predictive error significantly reduces the value of this data. 5. The knowledge base was not adequately documented. The attributes used in the knowledge base were not fully defined, and the interpretive logic of the attributes used in the predictive process was inadequately described. 6. The knowledge base was not evaluated against an independent data set. Most disturbing is that the authors do not seem to understand the problem of overtraining. Overtraining occurs when a knowledge base is calibrated too tightly to a selected data set and then fails because relationships coded were specific to the given data set not the population being predicted. The predictive accuracy then falls significantly when applied to an independent data set. The short comings make evaluation of the quality and application of the input data difficult. Furthermore, the lack of adequately documentation on attribute extraction meth- 1
5 methods and knowledge base structure, values and logic makes assessment of the results impossible and precludes incorporation into a provincial knowledge base. 2
6 1. Introduction 1.1. Background The Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management commissioned this report as part of a project to evaluate, against the PEM Inventory Standard, Input Data Quality Reports submitted in support of PEM projects. Based on these reviews, the contractor was to prepare and report on a framework and format for future Input Data Quality Reports. The specification for a PEM standard, against which the IDQ Report is evaluated arose, from four preceding works commissioned by the Terrestrial Ecosystem Mapping Alternatives Task Force of the Resources Inventory Committee (RIC). These reports contained important background information and concepts which for the sake of brevity was not included in the standard but was referenced in the expectation that it would be read. These reports were: 1. Towards the Establishment of a Predictive Ecosystem Mapping Standard: A White Paper, by Keith Jones, R. Keith Jones & Associates; Del Meidinger, BC Ministry of Forests, Research Branch; Dave Clark, BC Ministry of Environment Lands and Parks, Resources Inventory Branch; and Fern Schultz, BC Ministry of Forests, Resources Inventory Branch. 2. Problem Analysis on Data Quality Assessment Issues by Dr. David Moon, CDT Core Decision Technologies Inc. 3. Situation Analysis for Knowledge-Based Systems by Dr. David Moon, CDT Core Decision Technologies Inc. 4. Problem Analysis on Reliability, Quality Control and Validation of Predictive Ecosystem Mapping (PEM) by Dr. Richard Sims and Jeff Matheson, R.A. Sims & Associates. The standard drew upon four additional reports: 1. Specifications for PEM, version Mapping entities, draft report 3. Protocol for Quality Assurance and Accuracy Assessment of Ecosystem Maps 4. A Method for Large Scale Biogeoclimatic Mapping in British Columbia. Because PEM was new and largely untested, the original report was somewhat general and emphasized documentation of data and procedure rather than prescription. The intent was to ensure that a qualified PEM practitioner would be able to evaluate the quality of the input data and procedures used in the production of a PEM map based on the documentation. In reality, the standard and its referenced reports proved an intimidating, nebulous, time consuming, and open-ended basis for developing IDQ Reports. The variability in quality and format of the reviewed reports is reflective of this reality. 1
7 1.2. Rationale for the Review The review evaluates the submitted Input Data Quality Report in terms of both the letter and the intent of the Predictive Ecosystem Mapping Inventory Standard for Input Data Quality Assessment. It evaluates organization, completeness, and adequacy of documentation from the perspective of an inventory specialist evaluating the quality of the input data and the adequacy of the procedures used to produce the PEM. It does not evaluate the adequacy of the report as a contract deliverable and it does not evaluate the quality of the data or procedures used. The original PEM Inventory Standard was neither prescriptive nor detailed and many of the items in the standard were recommendations rather than requirements. In addition, the original standard had not been tested. Finally, the original standard was not presented or intended as a template for reporting. It is therefore not surprising that submissions to date have been highly variable in terms of both format and completeness. The review format has therefore attempted to bring a standard format to the review and by extension provide an initial template for future IDQ reports Scope of the Review The review deals only with input data quality reporting, documentation of input data layer processing, and documentation of the knowledge base. It does not evaluate the adequacy of the data or procedures used, and it does not evaluate the conclusions presented in the report. The review evaluates only whether or not there is sufficient information presented for a knowledgeable PEM practitioner to evaluate the adequacy or efficacy of the input data and approach used Organization of the review The organization of this review attempts to evaluate and report the elements of the PEM process in the logical order in which they are preformed and represents a deviation from the order of presentation in the standard Introduction The introduction to the review presents: 1. Background to the review. 2. Rationale for the review. 3. The organization of the review (this section) The review proper The review proper has the following major elements: 1. The organization, presentation, and completeness of the report. 2. The individual input data layers. 3. The derivation/extraction and compilation of knowledge base attributes. 2
8 4. The knowledge base, and validation of the knowledge base Conclusions A general conclusion as to how well the IDQ report meets the letter and intent of the standard Elements of the Review Organization and Presentation The review will evaluate the report for organization and presentation; for ease of use and retrieval of information; for format and presentation of report elements including supporting data, use of tables and figures; and for appropriate summary and conclusions (specifically are they present and supported by the content of the report) Field Sampling and Field Data The standard has no requirement for field sampling however the intent of the standard requires the following documentation for both third party field data and field data collected by the contractor in support of the project: The development of the knowledge base is based in part on field data where the attributes being used in the predictive process are collected at locations where the siteseries is known. These sites may be collected by the PEM contractor in support of the project, by a third party in support of non-pem activities, or the contractor may choose a combination of both. Whatever option is chosen, the IDQ report should include the following documentation. 1. The kind, frequency, and distribution of field samples. 2. The method of sample selection (e.g., random, stratified random, selective/modal, etc.) and if stratified or selective the stratification or selection criteria. 3. Quality control and Quality Assurance protocols applied to the field data Input Data Layers Compilation Metadata Input map metadata provides basic information to ensure that the nature and limitations of input maps are understood before creating PEM input data layers. Most important of these are the original base map, projection, and methods used for compilation of the map and the history and nature of changes to the original map. Some consultants are unaware that TRIM data is compiled and distributed in Albers projection while forest cover and other maps use Universal Transverse Mercator. If obtained in digital form the difference will be obvious when processing is attempted. However if paper maps are digitized by the contractor and the difference is not known, it is probable the map will be digitized using the wrong projection. This difference could produce significant positional discrepancies in larger project areas. The metadata should include the process used to match projections, the magnitude of spatial shifts (rubber 3
9 sheeting) required during the conversion, the verification of thematic boundary accuracy (if any) and the nature of any thematic content changes during the update. Spatial Quality of Input Data Spatial Data Integrity Reconciliation to TRIM The spatial integrity metadata should include the method used to match projections between input maps or confirmation of that the conversion was done. The standard established a procedure for evaluating the consistency of the input data map with TRIM features, particularly hydrography. The standard is inadequate with any maps retrofitted to TRIM features (e.g., forest cover) unless the procedures and degree of spatial adjustment required to get conformance of TRIM features is recorded. Spatial integrity: The standard requires a measure of error for lines which fail to join at map sheet boundaries and for label consistency for polygons crossing map sheet boundaries. Spatial Accuracy of thematic boundaries: A more appropriate measure of spatial data integrity is the measurement of geographic coordinates for non-trim features such as cultural features which are common to both maps (e.g., cutblocks and roads). Thematic Data Input Quality The standard requires that for all input data layers, the suitability of the input data be evaluated for use in the PEM project. Only the spatial accuracy of TRIM data may be taken as given and even this refers only to TRIM features (including digital elevation points). It does not refer to thematic accuracy or to the interpolation of or derivation of landscape attributes such as slope, aspect, shape, slope position et cetera from TRIM data. The resolution of the TRIM data may not be able to adequately portray the scale of landscape characteristics important to the PEM process. This will be especially true in low relief and complex terrain such as hummocky kame and kettle topography, glacial fluvial deposits and others. Thematic Accuracy This element, while not required, refers to the validation of thematic attributes by comparing attributes from know geospatial coordinates to those attributes displayed at those coordinates on the map. Map Entity Suitability Mapping Concepts The standard requires an evaluation for appropriateness of and interpretive issues related to the nature of the mapping entities (things mapped e.g., terrain units) and the nature of the map entities (delineations on the map e.g., simple versus complex composition). The review will look for demonstrated understanding of the nature of the 4
10 mapping concepts used in the input data layers, for an understanding of the interpretive issues related to their use for predictive ecosystem mapping, and for documentation of how the issues were dealt with. Specifically, the review will look for documentation evaluating the resolution/complexity of the mapping and map entities, boundary precision for thematic maps, and boundary accuracy for thematic maps. While not specifically required in the standard, these issues are relevant to predictive ecosystem mapping and should be evaluated by competent practitioners. Resolution/Complexity In the case of thematic maps, resolution refers to the level of detail attached to the mapping entities used in the input data layer and complexity refers to the number and type of mapping individuals used as components in the map entity. With digital elevation data, resolution refers to the precision of the elevation measurement and the spacing of the elevation data points. Boundary Precision Boundary precision refers the sharpness of the transition between adjacent map units and/or the confidence with which the mapper has drawn the line. Both will influence the accuracy, precision, and interpretation of any spatial overlay product. Boundary Accuracy Boundary accuracy refers to how closely the delineation of a boundary on the map corresponds to its true location on the ground. Quality Control The PEM standard did not require reference to Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) or quality control protocols although elements of QC protocols are inherent in some of the metadata requirements. Despite this, the intent of the PEM Inventory Standard would be best met with a combination of SOPs and quality control procedures to ensure that the SOPs were applied appropriately. Standard Operating Procedures Standard operating procedures refer to procedures that have been extensively documented and tested to ensure that they produce consistent, reliable results when followed. They may be widely accepted and adopted, as with ISO standards, or they may simply be internal procedures that have been well documented and tested. The principal behind a SOP is that once tested and documented, it is only necessary to confirm that the procedure was followed and quality assurance testing can be significantly reduced. Quality Control Protocols Quality control protocols refer to application of standard procedures used to ensure the quality and integrity of either data or products, or it can refer to a series of quality assurance procedures to ensure that acceptable levels of quality are being met. In the case of SOPs, the procedure is assumed to produce acceptable quality and the intent is to ensure that the standard procedures have been applied. Examples include procedures to ensure that field data is correctly transferred to digital format or colour map edits to ensure that thematic data is correctly attached to polygons. Quality control protocols should consist of defined procedures for the production or editing of data, in- 5
11 formation, or intermediate or final products and a formal sign-off to confirm that the procedure was implemented as documented. Quality Assurance Unlike quality control, quality assurance consists of actual testing of the interim and final products to ensure that acceptable levels of accuracy or reliability are being achieved. When coupled with standard operating procedures, the level and frequency of quality assurance can be significantly reduced. Knowledge base validation was the only Quality Assurance procedure required for Input Data Quality Reporting. Meta Data The PEM standard establishes minimum levels of documentation and meta-data required to evaluate the quality of input data, predictive procedures, and output products of PEM. The meta-data specified below meet three needs. 1. They provide sufficient information about the nature of the input entities, input data, predictive procedures, and output products for a qualified PEM practitioner to understand the limitations of these items for PEM applications. 2. Their compilation by the PEM practitioner ensures that the practitioner has researched the input data and adequately documented the procedures and output products. 3. A longer-term goal of the PEM standard is the eventual integration of PEM/TEM data, information, and knowledge into a single logical data model and repository. The task of integrating TEM with PEM is beyond the scope of this standard but this section will provide the documentation and meta-data necessary to construct such a repository. Meta data are required in the following areas. 1. Input map source, base, compilation, and map entities. 2. Input map processing including attribute extraction/derivation. 3. Knowledge base and knowledge processing algorithms. Thematic Compilation and Derivation Attribute Collection/Derivation and Compilation The derivation and/or compilation of thematic data layers requires the implementation of a set of procedures to either the original data capture and compilation or the evaluation and processing of third party input data. The standard requires documentation of these procedures either by reference to appended descriptions or to published documents. 6
12 Wherever possible these references should be to tested Standard Operating Procedures described above and should reference the quality control procedures used to confirm the quality of data or the application of tested Standard Operating Procedures. Attribute Definition The standard requires documentation of the attributes used in the PEM process. Elements of this documentation are its definition, domain, scale, and units of measure. The standard provides detailed specifications that should be followed Knowledge Base Documentation of the knowledge base requires the following. 1. The PEM entities being predicted. 2. The attributes being used to predict the entities. 3. The method of compilation of attributes for the spatial entities being predicted. 4. The logic, values, and algorithms used to make the prediction. The standard provides detailed specifications for documentation of the knowledge base. 2. Review 2.1. Organization and Presentation The organization of the report is clear and consistent and makes effective use of appropriately placed embedded tables and figures. Input metadata and input data quality for each input data theme are discussed separately from input data processing. Input data processing is discussed in general terms and it is sometimes difficult to determine how individual attributes have been processed. Since input processing and attribute derivation/extraction will differ between input data themes, it would be more effective to organize the report either by input data source and then each element of the IDQ report (e.g., metadata, spatial quality, thematic quality, extraction/derivation) or by report element and then by input data theme Field Sampling and Field Data The project used 137 field samples to verify thematic accuracy for input data layers and derivatives. Results were reported for derived and extracted attributes for each input data theme. While a useful approach the following limitations were noted. 1. The kind, frequency, and distribution of field samples were not documented.. 2. The method of sample selection was not documented and did not therefore, provide adequate information for a qualified PEM practitioner to evaluate the quality of data. 7
13 3. Quality control and Quality Assurance protocols applied to the field data were not documented and therefore limit confidence in the accuracy of the plot data Input Data Layers Input Data Sources Compilation Metadata for Input Maps TRIM: The report included most applicable compilation metadata for TRIM base maps and digital elevation data. However, there is no identification of the compilation format for TRIM as Albers. FC1: The report failed to provide sufficient compilation metadata for forest cover. There was no discussion of mapping or map entities and the report failed to discuss the history of the FC1 maps, the nature of modifications or revisions, or the implications of the nature of the retrofit to the TRIM base on the accuracy of the forest cover polygon boundaries. BEC: The report met most of the compilation metadata requirements but failed to explicitly identify the compilation scale or the mapping and map entities. Bioterrain: The report met much of the compilation metadata but did not specify whether the compilation scale was the same as the publication scale. The report also failed to identify the mapping and map entities used in the project. Since bioterrain differs from the terrain standard this cannot simply be referenced to the provincial standard. Spatial Quality of Input Maps TRIM: The PEM Inventory Standard accepts TRIM I and TRIM II as the spatial standard, therefore spatial quality issues were not addressed. FC1: The report met the standard requirement for comparison to TRIM features and edge match label consistency but did not report edge match line consistency. The report also assumed thematic boundary accuracy because the base map conformed to TRIM features but this assumption may not be valid depending on the nature of the retrofit. BEC: The report fully met the spatial quality data requirements of the PEM Inventory Standard. Bioterrain: The bioterrain map documentation met the requirement of the standard but provided no evaluation of spatial quality beyond provincial correlation. Thematic Quality of Input Maps TRIM: The PEM Inventory Standard assumes the spatial accuracy of TRIM bases and DEM to be adequate. However, the IDQ report did not address the issue of elevation sample density and associate issues of interpolated resolution relative to the scale of landscape features and the interpretive needs of the project. 8
14 (FC1). There was no discussion of mapping or map entities or their implications for PEM attribute extraction. While not required by the standard, the IDQ report presents quality assurance procedures. Prism sweeps were conducted on 130 plots. The project compared species volume from field sweeps to polygon attributes of the Forest cover maps. However, the lack of information on sampling strategy, positional accuracy of field samples, and sensitivity of the PEM interpretive procedures to input errors limits the utility of the data. BEC: The report identifies that the BEC mapping followed A Method for Large-scale Biogeoclimatic Mapping in British Columbia, 1999, level 2. This requires that each rule set for digital elevation modeling be tested at least once. No other quality assurance was reported. No information was provided on the nature of the test or tests. Bioterrain: There was no discussion of mapping or map entity suitability, resolution/complexity, or boundary accuracy with respect to PEM inferences. The report cites conformance to provincial Terrain Mapping standards but since bioterrain mapping, differs from terrain mapping additional documentation should be provided. The report cites field data from 20 randomly selected samples used to test the thematic accuracy of the bioterrain drainage and texture data but does not make clear if these are twenty samples randomly selected from the 130 existing field plots or additional plots sampled at random from the test area. The report provides no measure of positional accuracy of the sample plots any measure of PEM sensitivity to input data errors Input Data Derivation / Compilation In general, the IDQ report provides inadequate documentation of the nature of extracted or derived attributes and provides inadequate documentation of the method of extraction or derivation. The information needed to evaluate the extracted or derived data should be available from either standard operating procedures or documented inhouse procedures and from quality assurance. These issues are discussed below under Quality Control / Quality Assurance. Quality Control / Quality Assurance TRIM: The IDQ report provides no reference to Standard Operating Procedures and the in-house procedure describes the derivation of slope and aspect in terms of Arc/Info without any indication of parameterization or any explanation of the logic or nature of the resultant product. For example, it appears that bioterrain polygons were assigned a single mean slope and a single slope/aspect code (inferred from digital data definitions table) but there is no indication of how the single slope aspect code was derived (e.g., the combination of the mean polygon slope and the mean polygon aspect, the dominant slope/aspect combination found in the polygon, etc.). Quality assurance was conducted using 130 field plots but no sampling strategy or plan was presented, there was no indication of the positional accuracy of the field samples, and there was no presentation of predictive sensitivity to the error levels found. FC1: The IDQ report provides no reference to standard operating procedures for the extraction and does not refer to in-house procedures. Although some of these can be inferred from tables presented in the report it is time consuming and prone to misinterpretation. In particular Indicator Species 1 and Indicator Species 2 are not described. No additional quality assurance beyond that discussed under Thematic Quality of Input Data was reported. 9
15 BEC: BEC units were not used in the derivation of or the extraction of any attributes. Bioterrain: The IDQ report provides no reference to standard operating procedures and provides inadequate documentation for the extraction of terrain texture and slope class. For example the digital data definitions report drainage1 and drainage2 as attributes but allow up to three terrain components. It is not clear how drainage is applied. No additional quality assurance beyond that discussed under Thematic Quality of Input Data was reported. Attribute Metadata Entity Described by extracted attributes It appears that the entities being described are all cross products of the overlay process after sliver removal. However it is not clear whether the attribute extraction occurs before or after the overlay process nor is it clear whether some attributes apply to a bioterrain polygon as a whole, the components of the bioterrain polygon, or to the overlay resultants. Attribute Definitions What appear to be a key knowledgebase input variables (indicator species 1 and 2) are not defined. Otherwise, Tables 5, 7, and 9 of the IDQ report provide the attributes which constitute a full attribute definition. Tables 5, 7, and 9 conform to the recommendation in the standard, however the format of the table would require significant manual entry into a data dictionary before any programmatic correlation could take place. In addition, much of the information must be inferred or retrieved from referenced materials. While consistent with both the letter and intent of the Standard, compilation of a provincial knowledge base would be facilitated by a standard reporting format Input Data Summary Report Table 1 presents a summary evaluation of each of the components of Input Data Layers for the data layers used in the report. This review was based on the IDQ report alone. It is time constrained and may contain errors of misinterpretation, omission, or commission. However, the organization of the report reviewed and the need to present a common review format for widely divergent IDQ reports made retrieval and review of specific elements difficult and error prone. In addition, some unanswered questions or areas of ambiguity may have been answerable by review the PEM map products and/or report. Input Data Sources DEM FC BEC Bioterrain Compilation Metadata Citation* NA F NA NA Consultant/Department* F F F F Compilation Scale* NA X X X Publication Scale* F F NA F Period of Compilation* F F F F Original base / projection NA X NA NA Pedigree NA X NA NA 10
16 Current base / projection* F P P P Mapping Entities* NA X X X Map Entities* NA X X X Spatial Quality Reconciliation to TRIM* NA M NA NA Spatial Integrity Edge match lines* NA X F F Edge match labels* NA F F F Raster Size* NA NA NA NA Thematic Boundary Accuracy NA X X X Thematic Quality Map Entity Suitability* X X NA X Resolution/Complexity X X X X Boundary Accuracy NA X X X Quality Control Standard Operating Procedures NA NA F F Monitoring Protocols NA NA M M Quality Assurance Sample strategy/plan NA P X F Positional Accuracy NA X X X PEM Sensitivity NA X X X Accuracy* NA X X F Input Data Derivation / Compilation Quality Control / Assurance Standard Operating Procedures* X X NA X In-house Procedures* I P NA I Quality Assurance Sample Strategy/Plan P X NA X Positional Accuracy P X NA X PEM Sensitivity X X NA X Accuracy M M X F Attribute Metadata Entity Described* X X NA I Data Definition* M I NA I *Indicates that the feature was identified in the PEM Inventory Standard Codes NA = Not Applicable F = Fully Met (meets the intent of the standard) M = Met (meets the letter of the standard) P = Partially Met (enough information to be useful but is incomplete) I = Inadequate (partially met but insufficient to be useful) X = Not addressed 11
17 2.4. Knowledge Base and Algorithm Requirements Entities The IDQ report does not explicitly define the mapping and map entities being predicted by the PEM process. The mapping entities appear to be the resultants of a bioterrain / forest cover overlay treated as components of the parent bioterrain polygon. However, the definition of the PEM digital database shows only two site series deciles. It is unclear how these are derived or what entities are being portrayed on the map Knowledge Base Attribute Compilation Cross Product Resolution The issue of cross product resultants of the overlay process is discussed but does not explain how the number of cross products is resolved to produce predictive entities. As noted above, it is unclear how the process moves from the overlay process to the prediction of only two site series deciles per terrain polygon. Sliver adjustment The method and criteria of sliver removal are adequately explained Belief Matrices The IDQ report states that a belief matrix approach was used in the predictive process and Table 7 gives definitions of the attributes used to infer site series. Table 8 is said to present the logic applying attribute belief values to the predictive process but makes no reference to the entities being predicted. The report fails to identify whether Table 8 refers to a single site series and the structure of the belief matrix and interpretive algorithm is unclear. It is possible that the consultant considered the knowledge base to be proprietary and successfully obfuscated their approach. Unfortunately, they also made it impossible to evaluate the approach used. Sensitivity Analysis This section was not discussed in the PEM Inventory Standard and the IDQ report did not discuss the sensitivity of prediction to errors in input data and identify whether attribute errors interact as cumulative, compensating, or random in their effect Knowledge Base Validation Test Description The discussion of knowledge base validation is confusing and does not appear to conform to the PEM Inventory Standard requirement for independent validation of the knowledge base. The rationale presented is unconvincing. Test Results No validation results are presented. 12
18 3. Conclusions The report does not meet fully the letter or the intent of the PEM Inventory Standard for Input Data Quality Reporting. 1. Documentation of metadata for the input data layers while conforming largely to the letter of the standard was incomplete. Of special concern was that the history or pedigree of Forest Cover map revisions, base map conversion, and retrofit procedures were ignored. Also of concern is the failure to explicitly recognize the TRIM original projection is Albers and that conversion to UTM was done appropriately. 2. Documentation of the attribute extraction/derivation procedures was incomplete. 3. Documentation of quality control and quality assurance was inadequate and while the use of field plots established to support development of the knowledge base as a test for the quality of primary or derived input data was commendable, failure to document sampling strategy and design, failure to document attribute derivation and extraction procedures, failure to evaluate the nature of mapping entities, map entities (spatial accuracy and thematic resolution and accuracy) limited the utility of the information. 4. Despite relatively high error values in those attributes tested against field data, there was no discussion of the sensitivity of ecosystem prediction to errors in the input data. Failure to provide a simple error analysis identifying the impact of individual and cumulative attribute errors on predictive error significantly reduces the value of this data. 5. The knowledge base was not adequately documented. The attributes used in the knowledge base were not fully defined, and the interpretive logic of the attributes used in the predictive process were inadequately described. 6. The knowledge base was not evaluated against an independent data set. The short comings make evaluation of the quality and application of the input data difficult. Furthermore, the failure to adequately document attribute extraction methods and knowledge base structure, values and logic makes assessment of the results impossible and precludes incorporation into a provincial knowledge base. 13
Problem Analysis on Data Quality Assessment Issues
Problem Analysis on Data Quality Assessment Issues ITQ #CRS 9062 Submitted to the TEM Alternatives Task Force By D.E. Moon, CDT Core Decision Technologies Inc. Summary This report emphasizes the elements
More informationVegetation Resources Inventory
Vegetation Resources Inventory Guidelines for Preparing a Project Implementation Plan for Photo Interpretation Prepared by Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management Terrestrial Information Branch for
More informationIMPLEMENTATION NOTE. Validating Risk Rating Systems at IRB Institutions
IMPLEMENTATION NOTE Subject: Category: Capital No: A-1 Date: January 2006 I. Introduction The term rating system comprises all of the methods, processes, controls, data collection and IT systems that support
More informationIntroduction to GIS (Basics, Data, Analysis) & Case Studies. 13 th May 2004. Content. What is GIS?
Introduction to GIS (Basics, Data, Analysis) & Case Studies 13 th May 2004 Content Introduction to GIS Data concepts Data input Analysis Applications selected examples What is GIS? Geographic Information
More informationA GIS helps you answer questions and solve problems by looking at your data in a way that is quickly understood and easily shared.
A Geographic Information System (GIS) integrates hardware, software, and data for capturing, managing, analyzing, and displaying all forms of geographically referenced information. GIS allows us to view,
More information5.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL
0 0 0. QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL.. Introduction The IPCC Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management (GPG000, IPCC, 000), Chapter, Quality Assurance and Quality Control, defines quality
More informationLand Based Investment Program Forest Investment Account Data Management Standard
Land Based Investment Program Forest Investment Account Data Management Standard Data Management Standard Prepared by Integrated Land Management Bureau GeoBC Information Services Branch for the Resources
More informationdesert conservation program Data Management Guidelines
desert conservation program Data Management Guidelines Introduction The Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological and Conference Opinion on Clark
More informationIntegrating Quality Assurance into the GIS Project Life Cycle
Integrating Quality Assurance into the GIS Project Life Cycle Abstract GIS databases are an ever-evolving entity. From their humble beginnings as paper maps, through the digital conversion process, to
More informationUse the Academic Word List vocabulary to make tips on Academic Writing. Use some of the words below to give advice on good academic writing.
Use the Academic Word List vocabulary to make tips on Academic Writing Use some of the words below to give advice on good academic writing. abstract accompany accurate/ accuracy/ inaccurate/ inaccuracy
More informationpm4dev, 2016 management for development series Project Scope Management PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS
pm4dev, 2016 management for development series Project Scope Management PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS A methodology to manage development
More informationTerrestrial Ecosystem Information Digital Data Submission Standard - Draft for Field Testing
Terrestrial Ecosystem Information Digital Data Submission Standard - Draft for Field Testing Database and GIS Data Standards Prepared by Ministry of Environment Ecosystems Branch for the Terrestrial Ecosystems
More informationQuality System: Design Control Procedure - Appendix
Quality System: Design Control Procedure - Appendix Page 1 of 10 Quality System: Design Control Procedure - Appendix CORP Medical Products Various details have been removed, indicated by [ ] 1. Overview
More information1986-1991 ENUMERATION AREA CORRESPONDENCE FILE
1986-1991 ENUMERATION AREA CORRESPONDENCE FILE DATA QUALITY STATEMENT AND RECORD LAYOUT April 1992 1986-1991 Enumeration Area Correspondence File Data Quality Statement 1 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction...2
More informationData Management Implementation Plan
Appendix 8.H Data Management Implementation Plan Prepared by Vikram Vyas CRESP-Amchitka Data Management Component 1. INTRODUCTION... 2 1.1. OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE... 2 2. DATA REPORTING CONVENTIONS... 2
More informationUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT MANUAL TRANSMITTAL SHEET. 1283 Data Administration and Management (Public)
Form 1221-2 (June 1969) Subject UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT MANUAL TRANSMITTAL SHEET 1283 Data Administration and Management (Public) Release 1-1742 Date 7/10/2012
More informationCOUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICE 500 West Temple Street 493 Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration Los Angeles, CA 90012
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICE 500 West Temple Street 493 Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration Los Angeles, CA 90012 RICHARD SANCHEZ ACTING CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER Telephone: (213) 974-2008
More information1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview
Guidance document for the writing of standard operating procedures (Taken from United States Environmental Protection Agency Guidance for Preparing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) EPA QA/G- 6 [EPA/600/B-
More informationDATA VISUALIZATION GABRIEL PARODI STUDY MATERIAL: PRINCIPLES OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS AN INTRODUCTORY TEXTBOOK CHAPTER 7
DATA VISUALIZATION GABRIEL PARODI STUDY MATERIAL: PRINCIPLES OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS AN INTRODUCTORY TEXTBOOK CHAPTER 7 Contents GIS and maps The visualization process Visualization and strategies
More informationENHANCING INTELLIGENCE SUCCESS: DATA CHARACTERIZATION Francine Forney, Senior Management Consultant, Fuel Consulting, LLC May 2013
ENHANCING INTELLIGENCE SUCCESS: DATA CHARACTERIZATION, Fuel Consulting, LLC May 2013 DATA AND ANALYSIS INTERACTION Understanding the content, accuracy, source, and completeness of data is critical to the
More informationGuidelines for Archiving Data in the NARSTO Permanent Data Archive
Guidelines for Archiving in the NARSTO Permanent Archive Executive Summary May 2, 2006 NARSTO archives air chemistry, meteorological, and related atmospheric data and metadata in a publicly accessible
More informationMetadata for Big River Watershed Geologic and Geomorphic Data
Metadata for Big River Watershed Geologic and Geomorphic Data Metadata are descriptions and information regarding compiled data. This appendix contains the metadata that describes the compiled data used
More informationAn Introduction to. Metrics. used during. Software Development
An Introduction to Metrics used during Software Development Life Cycle www.softwaretestinggenius.com Page 1 of 10 Define the Metric Objectives You can t control what you can t measure. This is a quote
More informationGEOENGINE MSc in Geomatics Engineering (Master Thesis) Anamelechi, Falasy Ebere
Master s Thesis: ANAMELECHI, FALASY EBERE Analysis of a Raster DEM Creation for a Farm Management Information System based on GNSS and Total Station Coordinates Duration of the Thesis: 6 Months Completion
More informationProcedures for Factoring Visual Resources into Timber Supply Analyses
Procedures for Factoring Visual Resources into Timber Supply Analyses March 17, 1998 Final Version 0 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of these procedures is to enable visual resources, to be incorporated into the
More informationAPPENDIX N. Data Validation Using Data Descriptors
APPENDIX N Data Validation Using Data Descriptors Data validation is often defined by six data descriptors: 1) reports to decision maker 2) documentation 3) data sources 4) analytical method and detection
More informationVCS REDD Methodology Module. Methods for monitoring forest cover changes in REDD project activities
1 VCS REDD Methodology Module Methods for monitoring forest cover changes in REDD project activities Version 1.0 May 2009 I. SCOPE, APPLICABILITY, DATA REQUIREMENT AND OUTPUT PARAMETERS Scope This module
More informationA Method Using ArcMap to Create a Hydrologically conditioned Digital Elevation Model
A Method Using ArcMap to Create a Hydrologically conditioned Digital Elevation Model High resolution topography derived from LiDAR data is becoming more readily available. This new data source of topography
More informationGIS 101 - Introduction to Geographic Information Systems Last Revision or Approval Date - 9/8/2011
Page 1 of 10 GIS 101 - Introduction to Geographic Information Systems Last Revision or Approval Date - 9/8/2011 College of the Canyons SECTION A 1. Division: Mathematics and Science 2. Department: Earth,
More informationHelp Desk Review of Quality Assurance Project Plans
Help Desk Review of Quality ssurance Project Plans May 2, 2011 pproved by Beverly H. van Buuren, Surface Water mbient Monitoring Program Quality ssurance Officer, on May 2, 2011 1. Purpose This document
More informationGEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS CERTIFICATION
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS CERTIFICATION GIS Syllabus - Version 1.2 January 2007 Copyright AICA-CEPIS 2009 1 Version 1 January 2007 GIS Certification Programme 1. Target The GIS certification is aimed
More informationImage Analysis CHAPTER 16 16.1 ANALYSIS PROCEDURES
CHAPTER 16 Image Analysis 16.1 ANALYSIS PROCEDURES Studies for various disciplines require different technical approaches, but there is a generalized pattern for geology, soils, range, wetlands, archeology,
More informationPlan Plus Volume 1 No 1 2002 (117-123)
Plan Plus Volume 1 No 1 2002 (117-123) APPLICATION OF GIS (GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM) FOR LANDSLIDE HAZARD ZONATION AND MAPPING DISASTER PRONE AREA: A STUDY OF KULEKHANI WATERSHED, NEPAL Purna Chandra
More informationModel Virginia Map Accuracy Standards Guideline
Commonwealth of Virginia Model Virginia Map Accuracy Standards Guideline Virginia Information Technologies Agency (VITA) Publication Version Control Publication Version Control: It is the user's responsibility
More informationImplementation Planning
Implementation Planning presented by: Tim Haithcoat University of Missouri Columbia 1 What is included in a strategic plan? Scale - is this departmental or enterprise-wide? Is this a centralized or distributed
More informationA Java Tool for Creating ISO/FGDC Geographic Metadata
F.J. Zarazaga-Soria, J. Lacasta, J. Nogueras-Iso, M. Pilar Torres, P.R. Muro-Medrano17 A Java Tool for Creating ISO/FGDC Geographic Metadata F. Javier Zarazaga-Soria, Javier Lacasta, Javier Nogueras-Iso,
More informationWHAT IS GIS - AN INRODUCTION
WHAT IS GIS - AN INRODUCTION GIS DEFINITION GIS is an acronym for: Geographic Information Systems Geographic This term is used because GIS tend to deal primarily with geographic or spatial features. Information
More informationData Quality. Tips for getting it, keeping it, proving it! Central Coast Ambient Monitoring Program
Data Quality Tips for getting it, keeping it, proving it! Central Coast Ambient Monitoring Program Why do we care? Program goals are key what do you want to do with the data? Data utility increases directly
More informationThe LANL Physical Inventory Program. The LANL Physical Inventory Program LA-UR-01-3598
42 nd INMM Annual Meeting, July 15-19, 2001 Indian Wells, CA USA The LANL Physical Inventory Program LA-UR-01-3598 John A. Pompeo, TSM Safeguards and Security Division Materials Control & Measurement Team
More informationSTATE OF NEVADA Department of Administration Division of Human Resource Management CLASS SPECIFICATION
STATE OF NEVADA Department of Administration Division of Human Resource Management CLASS SPECIFICATION TITLE PHOTOGRAMMETRIST/CARTOGRAPHER V 39 6.102 PHOTOGRAMMETRIST/CARTOGRAPHER II 33 6.110 PHOTOGRAMMETRIST/CARTOGRAPHER
More informationInternal Audit Report. For the 2003 2004 Fiscal Year. Prepared by CONSULTING AND AUDIT CANADA. on behalf of the
INTERNAL AUDIT INFRASTRUCTURE BRANCH COMPLIANCE WITH KEY PROJECT APPROVAL AND CONTRIBUTION PAYMENT PROCESS CONTROLS Internal Audit Report For the 2003 2004 Fiscal Year Prepared by CONSULTING AND AUDIT
More informationSingle and Multiple-Case Study Designs IS493
1 2 Research Strategies Basic oppositions Survey research versus Case study quantitative versus qualitative The whole gamut Experiment Survey Archival analysis Historical research Case study 3 Basic Conditions
More informationAPLS 2011. GIS Data: Classification, Potential Misuse, and Practical Limitations
APLS 2011 GIS Data: Classification, Potential Misuse, and Practical Limitations GIS Data: Classification, Potential Misuse, and Practical Limitations Goals & Objectives Develop an easy to use geospatial
More informationUnderstanding Raster Data
Introduction The following document is intended to provide a basic understanding of raster data. Raster data layers (commonly referred to as grids) are the essential data layers used in all tools developed
More informationVector analysis - introduction Spatial data management operations - Assembling datasets for analysis. Data management operations
Vector analysis - introduction Spatial data management operations - Assembling datasets for analysis Transform (reproject) Merge Append Clip Dissolve The role of topology in GIS analysis Data management
More informationDATA QUALITY IN GIS TERMINOLGY GIS11
DATA QUALITY IN GIS When using a GIS to analyse spatial data, there is sometimes a tendency to assume that all data, both locational and attribute, are completely accurate. This of course is never the
More informationGeomatics Guidance Note 3
Geomatics Guidance Note 3 Contract area description Revision history Version Date Amendments 5.1 December 2014 Revised to improve clarity. Heading changed to Geomatics. 4 April 2006 References to EPSG
More informationSpatial data quality assessment in GIS
Recent Advances in Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering Spatial data quality assessment in GIS DANIELA CRISTIANA DOCAN Surveying and Cadastre Department Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest
More informationDraft Template. Quality Manual. For Biotechnology Quality Management System v1b
Draft Template For Biotechnology Quality Management System v1b Printed copies are uncontrolled Page 1 of 16 Table of contents: Section Page 4.0 Biotechnology Quality Management System. 3-4 5.0 Management
More informationMINIMUM STANDARDS FOR ACCEPTANCE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES DELINEATION REPORTS
MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR ACCEPTANCE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES DELINEATION REPORTS U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUILDING STRONG January 2016 The U.S Army Corps of Engineers, through its Regulatory Program, regulates
More informationJOHN HART GENERATING STATION REPLACEMENT PROJECT. Schedule 9. Quality Management
JOHN HART GENERATING STATION REPLACEMENT PROJECT Schedule 9 Quality Management SCHEDULE 9 QUALITY MANAGEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM... 1 1.1 Quality Management System...1 1.2 Project
More informationinterpretation and implication of Keogh, Barnes, Joiner, and Littleton s paper Gender,
This essay critiques the theoretical perspectives, research design and analysis, and interpretation and implication of Keogh, Barnes, Joiner, and Littleton s paper Gender, Pair Composition and Computer
More information7 Directorate Performance Managers. 7 Performance Reporting and Data Quality Officer. 8 Responsible Officers
Contents Page 1 Introduction 2 2 Objectives of the Strategy 2 3 Data Quality Standards 3 4 The National Indicator Set 3 5 Structure of this Strategy 3 5.1 Awareness 4 5.2 Definitions 4 5.3 Recording 4
More informationReconciliation Best Practice
INTRODUCTION This paper provides an outline statement of what we consider to be best practice with respect to the use of reconciliation software used by asset managers. It is not a description of any particular
More informationGeography 4203 / 5203. GIS Modeling. Class 12: Spatial Data Quality and Uncertainty
Geography 4203 / 5203 GIS Modeling Class 12: Spatial Data Quality and Uncertainty Some Updates - Progress Reports Progress reports: 11 & 14 April (instead of 14 & 16 April) Class on 16 April: Jeremy Class
More informationDigital Cadastral Maps in Land Information Systems
LIBER QUARTERLY, ISSN 1435-5205 LIBER 1999. All rights reserved K.G. Saur, Munich. Printed in Germany Digital Cadastral Maps in Land Information Systems by PIOTR CICHOCINSKI ABSTRACT This paper presents
More informationEnvironmental Remote Sensing GEOG 2021
Environmental Remote Sensing GEOG 2021 Lecture 4 Image classification 2 Purpose categorising data data abstraction / simplification data interpretation mapping for land cover mapping use land cover class
More informationGuidelines on Information Deliverables for Research Projects in Grand Canyon National Park
INTRODUCTION Science is playing an increasing role in guiding National Park Service (NPS) management activities. The NPS is charged with protecting and maintaining data and associated information that
More informationDetermining Return on Investment for Forests for Tomorrow. Forests For Tomorrow February 2013 (supersedes earlier FFT ROI documents)
Determining Return on Investment for Forests for Tomorrow Forests For Tomorrow February 2013 (supersedes earlier FFT ROI documents) 1 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 1. ROI field cards... 3 2. ROI
More informationDo you know? "7 Practices" for a Reliable Requirements Management. by Software Process Engineering Inc. translated by Sparx Systems Japan Co., Ltd.
Do you know? "7 Practices" for a Reliable Requirements Management by Software Process Engineering Inc. translated by Sparx Systems Japan Co., Ltd. In this white paper, we focus on the "Requirements Management,"
More informationVALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES: TEXT AND METHODOLOGY Q2(R1)
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE ICH HARMONISED TRIPARTITE GUIDELINE VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES: TEXT AND METHODOLOGY
More informationGIS Solutions for FTTx Design. David Nelson, GISP
GIS Solutions for FTTx Design David Nelson, GISP Telecom GIS Manager, Black & Veatch Agenda Intro to GIS Telecom GIS Vision GIS Strategy Project Execution Mobile Online Services Dashboards Client Deliverables
More informationActuarial Standard of Practice No. 23. Data Quality. Revised Edition
Actuarial Standard of Practice No. 23 Data Quality Revised Edition Developed by the General Committee of the Actuarial Standards Board and Applies to All Practice Areas Adopted by the Actuarial Standards
More informationForest Inventory Strategic Plan
February 2013 Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations Forest Inventory Strategic Plan The forest inventory program outlined in this strategic plan will help the Ministry of Forests,
More informationINSTITUTIONALIZE METADATA BEFORE IT INSTITUTIONALIZES YOU
Lynda Wayne FGDC Metadata Education Coordinator GeoMaxim 60 Cherokee Road Asheville, NC 28801 P 828.250.3801 F 828.251.6242 Lwayne@GeoMaxim.com INSTITUTIONALIZE METADATA BEFORE IT INSTITUTIONALIZES YOU
More informationChesapeake Bay Program. Geospatial Data Quality Assurance Project Plan
Chesapeake Bay Program Geospatial Data Quality Assurance Project Plan Standard Operating Procedures for Managing Geospatial Data Richard Batiuk, EPA Associate Director CBPO QA Officer Date Mike Fritz,
More informationSupporting Online Material for Achard (RE 1070656) scheduled for 8/9/02 issue of Science
Supporting Online Material for Achard (RE 1070656) scheduled for 8/9/02 issue of Science Materials and Methods Overview Forest cover change is calculated using a sample of 102 observations distributed
More informationDevelopment of an Impervious-Surface Database for the Little Blackwater River Watershed, Dorchester County, Maryland
Development of an Impervious-Surface Database for the Little Blackwater River Watershed, Dorchester County, Maryland By Lesley E. Milheim, John W. Jones, and Roger A. Barlow Open-File Report 2007 1308
More informationQuality Assurance/Quality Control Plan: Samples and Manual for Development
DRAFT Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan: Samples and Manual for Development Report prepared by Dr. Natalya Parasyuk for project CAPACITY BUILDING FOR IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORIES
More informationImage Draping & navigation within Virtual GIS
Image Draping & navigation within Virtual GIS Draping of Geo Corrected data such as aerial imagery or map data enables virtual 3D field tours to be conducted in an area of interest. This document covers
More informationCurrent Standard: Mathematical Concepts and Applications Shape, Space, and Measurement- Primary
Shape, Space, and Measurement- Primary A student shall apply concepts of shape, space, and measurement to solve problems involving two- and three-dimensional shapes by demonstrating an understanding of:
More informationPLOTTING SURVEYING DATA IN GOOGLE EARTH
PLOTTING SURVEYING DATA IN GOOGLE EARTH D M STILLMAN Abstract Detail surveys measured with a total station use local coordinate systems. To make the data obtained from such surveys compatible with Google
More informationSolvency II Data audit report guidance. March 2012
Solvency II Data audit report guidance March 2012 Contents Page Introduction Purpose of the Data Audit Report 3 Report Format and Submission 3 Ownership and Independence 4 Scope and Content Scope of the
More informationStand Density Management Diagram
H O W T O U S E A Stand Density Management Diagram Yield predictions for a spacing prescription Ministry of Forests Forest Practices Branch Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Main entry under title:
More informationADWR GIS Metadata Policy
ADWR GIS Metadata Policy 1 PURPOSE OF POLICY.. 3 INTRODUCTION.... 4 What is metadata?... 4 Why is it important? 4 When to fill metadata...4 STANDARDS. 5 FGDC content standards for geospatial metadata...5
More informationMetadata, Geospatial data, Data management, Project management, GIS
Metadata in Action Expanding the Utility of Geospatial Metadata Lynda Wayne The production of geospatial metadata is now established as a GIS best practice. However, few organizations utilize metadata
More informationChapter 14 Completing the Tests in the Sales and Collection Cycle: Accounts Receivable
Chapter 14 Completing the Tests in the Sales and Collection Cycle: Accounts Receivable Review Questions 14-1 Tests of details of financial balances are designed to determine the reasonableness of the balances
More informationOECD DRAFT ADVISORY DOCUMENT 16 1 THE APPLICATION OF GLP PRINCIPLES TO COMPUTERISED SYSTEMS FOREWARD
OECD DRAFT ADVISORY DOCUMENT 16 1 THE APPLICATION OF GLP PRINCIPLES TO COMPUTERISED SYSTEMS FOREWARD 1. The following draft Advisory Document will replace the 1995 OECD GLP Consensus Document number 10
More informationEffecting Data Quality Improvement through Data Virtualization
Effecting Data Quality Improvement through Data Virtualization Prepared for Composite Software by: David Loshin Knowledge Integrity, Inc. June, 2010 2010 Knowledge Integrity, Inc. Page 1 Introduction The
More informationSeptember 2005 Report No. 06-009
An Audit Report on The Health and Human Services Commission s Consolidation of Administrative Support Functions Report No. 06-009 John Keel, CPA State Auditor An Audit Report on The Health and Human Services
More informationTomlinson, R. F. 1962 Computer Mapping: An Introduction to the Use of Electronic Computers In the Storage, Compilation and Assessment of Natural and
Tomlinson, R. F. 1962 Computer Mapping: An Introduction to the Use of Electronic Computers In the Storage, Compilation and Assessment of Natural and Economic Data for the Evaluation of Marginal Lands Report
More informationPDF Primer PDF. White Paper
White Paper PDF Primer PDF What is PDF and what is it good for? How does PDF manage content? How is a PDF file structured? What are its capabilities? What are its limitations? Version: 1.0 Date: October
More informationCutblock Openings and Recovering Productivity
Title: in Cutblock Openings and Recovering Productivity Number: Directive FMBRS-2014-01 Program Name: Forest Management Branch Effective Date: May 1, 2014 This document was updated on: Purpose To guide
More informationContent Sheet 7-1: Overview of Quality Control for Quantitative Tests
Content Sheet 7-1: Overview of Quality Control for Quantitative Tests Role in quality management system Quality Control (QC) is a component of process control, and is a major element of the quality management
More informationSoftware Requirements Specification
1 of 7 17.04.98 13:32 Software Requirements Specification The sub-sections : 1. What is a Software Requirements Specification 2. Why is a Software Requirement Specification Required 3. What is Contained
More informationTOWN OF WESTON,CT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. For. Parcel Mapping & Web-Based GIS Application
TOWN OF WESTON,CT I. INTRODUCTION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS For Parcel Mapping & Web-Based GIS Application The Town of Weston, Connecticut (the "Town") seeks proposals from interested GIS consultants for the
More informationGuidance for Industry
Guidance for Industry Q2B Validation of Analytical Procedures: Methodology November 1996 ICH Guidance for Industry Q2B Validation of Analytical Procedures: Methodology Additional copies are available from:
More informationOBSERVATIONS FROM 2010 INSPECTIONS OF DOMESTIC ANNUALLY INSPECTED FIRMS REGARDING DEFICIENCIES IN AUDITS OF INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
1666 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 207-9100 Facsimile: (202) 862-8430 www.pcaobus.org OBSERVATIONS FROM 2010 INSPECTIONS OF DOMESTIC ANNUALLY INSPECTED FIRMS REGARDING DEFICIENCIES
More informationNJDEP GPS Data Collection Standards For GIS Data Development
NJDEP GPS Data Collection Standards For GIS Data Development Bureau of Geographic Information Systems Office of Information Resource Management June 8, 2011 1.0 Introduction... 3 2.0 GPS Receiver Hardware
More information1. We assume the mentioned inaccuracies refer to the at least one foot in ten thousand standard described in point three.
RFQ GIS Parcel Boundary Correction Services BD 2015-035 Questions and Answers December 31st December 10 th 1. We assume the mentioned inaccuracies refer to the at least one foot in ten thousand standard
More informationGeographic Information System Product Distribution Policies. Preface
Support Services Department Information Technologies Division Geographic Information System Product Distribution Policies Preface 1. Purpose Geographic Information System (GIS) Product Distribution Policies
More informationSection 1 Project Management, Project Communication/Process Design, Mgmt, Documentation, Definition & Scope /CRO-Sponsor Partnership
Section 1 Project Management, Project Communication/Process Design, Mgmt, Documentation, Definition & Scope /CRO-Sponsor Partnership PROJECT MANAGEMENT - SCOPE DEFINITION AND MANAGEMENT Understands the
More informationDesign Verification. Introduction
Design verification is an essential step in the development of any product. Also referred to as qualification testing, design verification ensures that the product as designed is the same as the product
More informationA KNOWLEDGE-BASED APPROACH FOR REDUCING CLOUD AND SHADOW ABSTRACT
A KNOWLEDGE-BASED APPROACH FOR REDUCING CLOUD AND SHADOW Mingjun Song, Graduate Research Assistant Daniel L. Civco, Director Laboratory for Earth Resources Information Systems Department of Natural Resources
More informationITIL V3 and ISO/IEC 20000
For IT Service Management ITIL V3 and ISO/IEC 20000 Jenny Dugmore and Sharon Taylor Alignment White Paper March 2008 ITIL V3 and ISO/IEC 20000 Background For some years the close relationship between ITIL
More informationThe Fish Forestry Interaction Project Management Model (FFIP MM)
The Fish Forestry Interaction Project Management Model (FFIP MM) What is FFIP MM? The Fish Forestry Interaction Program Management Model is a spatially explicit simulation model that for the first time
More informationMASTER PROJECT PLAN. Project Name: Forest Information Mall. Project Sponsor: Ralph Archibald. Project Manager: Greg Goss
MASTER PROJECT PLAN Project Name: Forest Information Mall Project Sponsor: Ralph Archibald Project Manager: Greg Goss Issue/Revision Date: June 13, 2005 1.0 Project Purpose The purpose for this project
More informationGIS Spatial Data Standards
GIS Spatial Data Standards Manatee County, FL GIS Section, Information Services Department TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction 2 A. Purpose 2 B. Reference 2 II. Spatial Reference Information 2 A. Projection:
More informationAs a minimum, the report must include the following sections in the given sequence:
5.2 Limits for Wind Generators and Transformer Substations In cases where the noise impact at a Point of Reception is composed of combined contributions due to the Transformer Substation as well as the
More informationGuide to Writing a Project Report
Guide to Writing a Project Report The following notes provide a guideline to report writing, and more generally to writing a scientific article. Please take the time to read them carefully. Even if your
More information