NASA Technology Roadmap Update Overview
|
|
|
- Melina Fleming
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA Technology Roadmap Update Overview NASA Advisory Committee Technology, Innovation, and Engineering Committee Meeting December 4, 2014 Faith Chandler NASA Office of the Chief Technologist
2 Bottom Line Up Front 1. NASA Technology Roadmaps are a foundational element of NASA s of the Strategic Technology Investment Plan (STIP), an actionable plan that lays out the strategy for developing those technologies essential to the pursuit of NASA s mission and achievement of National goals. 2. NASA in Process of Updating of NASA Technology Roadmaps Process included multiple opportunities for input from those internal and external to NASA. Overall Roadmap technical organization the same - same Technical Area Breakdown Structure (TABs), with minor modifications and addition of TA15: Aeronautics. Expanded to include all NASA-developed technologies including Aeronautics (No longer just Space Technologies). Multiple enhancements included. Public will be provided the opportunity to review and comment on Roadmaps. 3. NASA s technology investments are tracked and analyzed in TechPort, a web-based software system that serves as NASA s integrated technology data source and decision support tool. 4. Together, the roadmaps, the STIP, and TechPort provide NASA the ability to track and manage the Agency-level technology portfolio. 2
3 Technology Portfolio Supports Missions National Science and Technology Priorities Top Down Driven Strategic Guidance NASA Mission Requirements Driven External Technology Priorities & Partnerships Technology Portfolio Aeronautics ARMD Human Exploration HEOMD Cross Cutting STMD Science SMD Information Technology 3
4 Background: Where Roadmaps Fit In Roadmaps A set of documents that consider a wide range of needed technologies and development pathways for the next 20 years. The roadmaps focus on applied research and development activities. Tech Finder Patents, Licenses, Software Agreements Available to Public Strategic Technology Investment Plan (STIP) An actionable plan that lays out the strategy for developing the technologies essential to the pursuit of NASA s mission and achievement of National goals. This plan provides the prioritization and guiding principles of investment for the technologies identified in the roadmaps. es=tagged.pdf NASA Technology Executive Council (NTEC) - NASA's senior decision-making body for technology policy, prioritization, and strategic investments. NASA Technology Executive Council (NTEC) Technology Projects Documented & Portfolio Analyzed Technology Projects Funded TechPort Web-based software system that serves as NASA s integrated authoritative technology data source and decision support tool. Provides information on technology programs and projects. Decisions of Technology Policy, Prioritization and Strategic Investments NASA s Budget Process 4
5 Background: Where Roadmaps Fit In Roadmaps What We Could Do Tech Finder Patents, Licenses, Software Agreements Available to Public SSTIP (Priorities) What We Should Do Technology Projects Documented & Portfolio Analyzed NTEC and Budget Process What We Will Do TechPort What We Are Doing NASA Technology Executive Council (NTEC) Decisions of Technology Policy, Prioritization and Strategic Investments Technology Projects Funded NASA s Budget Process 5
6 Roadmaps: Why an Update Now? FY 2010 Space Technology Roadmaps 140 challenges (10 per roadmap) 320 technologies 20-year horizon Revised every 4 years, last one 2010 FY 2011 National Research Council (NRC) Study Prioritization: 100 top technical challenges 83 high-priority technologies (roadmap-specific) 16 highest of high technologies (looking across all roadmaps) Requested every 4 years FY 2012 SSTIP Development Updated ST Roadmaps: Incorporate NRC Study Results Developing a Strategic Space Technology Investment Plan: Current investments current MD/Office priorities Opportunities for partnership Gaps vs. current budget and capabilities 20-Year horizon with 4-year implementation cadence Revised every 2 years Investment Portfolio NASA Technology Executive Council Uses SSTIP to Make Decisions Must accommodate: FY 2013 Execution Mission Needs & Commitments Push Opportunities Affordability Technical Progress Programmatic Performance Budgeted annually 6
7 What Does Update Mean? Scope Expanded All NASA Technology Roadmap Update Will Consider: Updates in Science Decadal surveys Human Exploration capability work Advancements in technology Will Include: State-of-art Capability needs Performance goals Expanded Scope: Aeronautics technology Autonomous systems Avionics Information technology Orbital debris Radiation Space weather Strategic Technology Investment Plan Update Will Consider: New priorities Current investments Unmet needs Partnerships & more Expanded Scope: Aeronautics technology Information technology Other technologies as influenced by other roadmap updates 7
8 What Does Update Mean? Reflects Changing Needs Include updates in new Human Exploration, Science, and Aeronautics mission needs: Human Exploration mission classes and design reference missions derived from Capability Driven Framework and Human Spaceflight Architecture studies Science mission classes and design reference missions derived from decadals and Science plans Aeronautics content from Thrust Areas and Aeronautics Research and Development Plans NASA relies on the science community to identify and prioritize leading-edge scientific questions and the observations required to answer them. One principal means by which NASA s Science Mission Directorate engages the science community in this task is through the National Research Council (NRC) Visions and Voyages for Planetary Science* 2012 Solar and Space Physics: A Science for a Technological Society* 2010 New Worlds, New Horizons in Astronomy and Astrophysics* 2007 Earth Science and Applications from Space: National Imperatives for the Next Decade and Beyond * The top three of the Decadal surveys are new and have influenced the Technology Roadmap updates 8
9 What Does Update Mean? Supports NASA s Capability Driven Framework 9
10 What Does Update Mean? Capability Driven Helps Align Priorities to Our Missions Mission Directorates - Decadals 2014 Roadmap Development Process Mission Class Design Reference Missions (DRM) Type Capability Capability Performance Goal 5 Capability State of the Art (SOA) 6 Capability Performance Gap Technology Performance Goal Technology State of the Art (SOA) Technology Gap Technology Candidates Extending Reach Beyond LEO Crewed Mission to Surface Entry, Descent and Landing Earth; km/s; Mars, 14 km/s Investment Plan Current Investments Unmet Needs (Technology Investment Gap) Stakeholder Priorities / Possible Partnerships NASA Technology Priorities Aeronautics Equivalent Terms Mission Class = Aeronautics Thrust DRM = Research Theme Technical Challenge Technical Work (Technologies) 10
11 Roadmap Document General Format 16 Sections Introductory/Crosscutting Section (Includes Index) 15 Technical Areas Main Body What s New? What s Different Overall technical organization the same - Same Technical Area Breakdown Structure (TABS), with minor modifications Content in Same Technical Area (TA) Some New Sub-Tiers More Detail (Snapshots) Includes Pull and Push Technologies Standard document format, definitions and graphics Introduction, crosscutting section, and index Tied to Mission Class and Capability Needs Includes SOA and Performance Goals Technology Candidate Snapshots ~40+ pages 11
12 Roadmap Document TABS and Snapshots Example Technology Area Breakdown Structure from Science Instruments, Observatories, and Sensor Systems, TA 8 Each TA Includes a Similar TABS Outline Technology Candidate Snapshots 12
13 Roadmap Document Technology Snapshot Overview X.Y Level 2 TABS Name X.Y.Z Level 3 TABS Name X.Y.Z.# Technology Name Technology Capability Technology Description: Description of the technology. The description should relate back to the capability. Technology Challenge: The top technical issues that impede achieving the capability performance goal. Technology Current SOA: The current state of the technology as applied to any environment. Parameter, Value: The performance that the technology in can currently provide, as related to the needed capability. TRL: Current TRL of the technology with respect to the planned operational environment Technology Performance Goal: The 20-year performance goal for this technology with respect to the performance goals identified for the capability need. Parameter, Value: The 20-year performance goal for this technology with respect to the performance parameters identified for the capability need. Technology Development Dependent Upon: List of dependencies, including other technologies and basic science. TRL: The TRL at PDR or when infused, unless a technology will not finish development by Needed Capability: Brief name for the capability needed to execute the mission Capability Description: Description of the capability needed to execute the mission. There should be a linkage between the Needed Capability and the DRM/mission class. Capability Current SOA: Best available capability that is currently being used to provide the described capability in your mission s environment Parameter, Value: The best performance provided in the mission environment associated with the state of the art described. Technology Needed For The Following NASA Mission Class and Design Reference Mission Mission Class: Design Reference Mission Mission Class: Design Reference Mission Capability Performance Goal: The performance that the capability needs to provide so as to execute the design reference mission(s). Parameter, Value: The performance parameters and values that are the key drivers for the development of technologies intended to meet the capability performance goal (need). Enabling or Enhancing Mission Class Date Launch Date Technology Need Date Minimum Time to Mature Technology Technology Section: Provides description, challenges, current technology state of the art, performance goal, and dependencies Capability Section: Describes the capability need, current capability state of the art, and mission-driven performance goals Mission Linkage: Lists Design Reference Missions needing the described capability, and relevant dates 13
14 New Introductory and Crosscutting Section New Section Contents 1. Technology Roadmap Overview 2. Technology Roadmap Development Process 3. Technologies that Cross Multiple Technology Areas and Indexes a. NASA s broad mission and goals drive the need for technologies that fulfill similar capabilities in many different technology areas b. Because of their nature, these technologies do not fit neatly into any one-technology area, but rather are spread across all 15 roadmaps. c. The 2014 Technology Roadmaps, therefore, provides extra details on 9 areas Expanded Areas 1. Autonomous Systems* and Artificial Intelligence 2. Avionics* 3. Extra Vehicular Activity 4. Information Technology* 5. In-Situ Resource Utilization 6. Orbital Debris* 7. Radiation* and Space Weather* 8. Sensors 9. Thermal Protection Systems 14
15 EXAMPLE: Thermal Protection Systems Thermal Protection Systems (TPS) protect spacecraft from extremely high temperatures and heating during all mission phases, and are very often low-to-no-fault-tolerant, critical systems that constitute a significant mass fraction of spacecraft. TPS technologies appear in 10 of the technology areas, as they require exotic materials and structures necessary for reentry and propulsion systems, and require hightemperature sensors and electronics for health monitoring and communication through plasma during reentry. 15
16 Roadmap Update Overview Input & Decisions NTEC* Initiated Radiation Technology Study NTEC Decision IT Scope Center Technology Council (CTC) Provide Input to Roadmap Process NTEC Decision Aero Scope NTEC Review Roadmap Process Roadmap Candidates Selected NTEC Decision Independent Assessment Scope Roadmap Team Kick Off March 2013 May 2013 June 2013 Aug 2013 Sept 2013 Dec 2013 Jan 2014 April 2014 June 2014 July 2014 Sept 2014 Oct 2014 Nov 2014 Feb 2015 Input & Reviews External Input Other Government Agency (OGA), Academia & Commercial Technical Interchange Meeting External Input OGA TIM SOA Plus - Review Center Review External Input OGA Review HQ Review External Review Independent Review *NTEC - NASA Technology Executive Council SOA State of Art 16
17 Conclusion 1. NASA Technology Roadmaps are a foundational element of NASA s Strategic Technology Investment Plan (STIP), an actionable plan that lays out the strategy for developing those technologies essential to the pursuit of NASA s mission and achievement of National goals. 2. NASA is in the process of updating of the NASA Technology Roadmaps Public will be provided the opportunity to review and comment on Roadmaps. 3. NASA s technology investments are tracked and analyzed in TechPort, a web-based software system that serves as NASA s integrated technology data source and decision support tool. 4. Together, the roadmaps, the STIP, and TechPort provide NASA the ability to manage the Agency-level technology portfolio. 17
18 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Back Up
19 Technology Definitions NASA Technology Definition: A solution that arises from applying the disciplines of engineering science to synthesize a device, process, or subsystem to enable a specific capability. Government-Wide Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-11 Conduct of Research and Development** Technology Included Basic Research Applied Research Development Systematic study directed toward fuller knowledge or understanding of the fundamental aspects of phenomena and of observable facts without specific applications towards processes or products in mind. Basic research, however, may include activities with broad applications in mind. Systematic study to gain knowledge or understanding necessary to determine the means by which a recognized and specific need may be met. Is directed toward the production of useful materials, devices, and systems or methods, including design, development, and improvement of prototypes and new processes to meet specific requirements. OMB Analytical Perspectives, Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2015 NASA Technology Actuals For Applied Research and Development = $7.8B in 2013 (This includes mission-specific technology and development and associated infrastructure). ** Can be downloaded at: 19
20 What Does Update Mean? Address NRC s Recommendations 2011 NRC Recommendations Final FY12 Roadmaps Technology Development Priorities SSTIP FY14 Roadmap Process Advanced Stirling Radioisotope Generators Other Cryogenic Storage and Handling Systems Analysis HEOMD Systems Analysis Managing the Progression of Technologies to Higher Technology Readiness Levels Foundational Technology Base 10% low TRL Cooperative Development of New Technologies SSTIP Measure Technology Transition Mission use agreements Industry Access to NASA Data TechPort NASA Investments in Commercial Space Technology Crosscutting Technologies TA Breakdown Structure Recommendations 20
21 SSTIP Development Process 21
22 Introduction to TechPort TechPort is a web-based software system. NASA s TechPort A window into NASA s pioneering and cross-cutting technology programs and projects. NASA develops and matures technologies that enable achievement of aeronautics, space exploration, and scientific-discovery missions. TechPort serves as the Agency s integrated technology data source, sharing the latest accomplishments and new and exciting technology projects from all of NASA s Mission Directorates, Centers and facilities. 22
23 Introduction to TechPort TechPort makes a wide range of technology information available, so different users can search and find information relevant to their specific needs. Provides the capability to search and select NASA technology information. Management Team Brief Description Technology Readiness Level (TRL) Anticipated Benefits Realized Benefits Potential Applications Contributing Partners Where Developed NASA Firsts News Stories Social Media Links Track milestones Track technology infusion into NASA missions Provides capability to analyze the Agency technology portfolio and evaluate how NASA s technology portfolio aligns with the Agency s investment strategy. Search Select Single Project Report Provides capability to generate reports. Portfolio Analysis 23
24 Introduction to TechPort TechPort provides the capability to generate standard and custom reports. This enables NASA to manage the Agency-level technology portfolio, access gaps and overlaps, and make assessments on balance and prioritization. 24
NASA Office of Inspector General
NASA Office of Inspector General National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Audits NASA S EFFORTS TO MANAGE ITS SPACE TECHNOLOGY PORTFOLIO December 15, 2015 Report No. IG-16-008 Office of
Space Technology Mission Directorate
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Technology Mission Directorate Overview of STMD Programs and Venus Related Content Jeffrey Sheehy Senior Technical Officer 7 Apr 2015 www.nasa.gov/spacetech
Laguduva Kubendran, PhD, MBA Program Executive, NASA HQ GSFC Emerging Commercial Suborbital Capabilities Workshop September 7, 2011. www.nasa.
Laguduva Kubendran, PhD, MBA Program Executive, NASA HQ GSFC Emerging Commercial Suborbital Capabilities Workshop September 7, 2011 www.nasa.gov Office of the Chief Technologist Program Map Space Tech
Why Invest in Space Technology?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Technology Mission Directorate COMSTAC Michael Gazarik Associate Administrator Space Technology Mission Directorate September 17, 2014 www.nasa.gov/spacetech
NASA S APPROACH TO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
NASA s FY 2015 Management and Performance section 1,2 is an appendix to NASA s 2015 Congressional Justification. This section summarizes NASA as an organization and NASA s approach to performance management,
Technology & Innovation Committee
Technology & Innovation Committee NAC Advisory Council Dr. Bill Ballhaus, Chair November 30, 2012 Office of the Chief Technologist Technology & Innovation Committee The scope of the Committee includes
Space Technology Mission Directorate
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Technology Mission Directorate ASEB Meeting Presented by: Mr. Stephen Jurczyk Associate Administrator, STMD April 21,2015 www.nasa.gov/spacetech Space
Commercial Crew Program Status
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Crew Program Status for the NAC Presenter Title Date Philip McAlister of Presentation Acting Director, Commercial Spaceflight Development NASA HQ
NASA Space Technology Programs ISS Research and Development Conference June 27, 2012 Richard B. Leshner, Ph.D. Program Executive SBIR/STTR
NASA Space Technology Programs ISS Research and Development Conference June 27, 2012 Richard B. Leshner, Ph.D. Program Executive SBIR/STTR Office of the Chief Technologist In 2010 NASA established the
Value to the Mission. FEA Practice Guidance. Federal Enterprise Architecture Program Management Office, OMB
Value to the Mission FEA Practice Guidance Federal Enterprise Program Management Office, OMB November 2007 FEA Practice Guidance Table of Contents Section 1: Overview...1-1 About the FEA Practice Guidance...
Analysis One Code Desc. Transaction Amount. Fiscal Period
Analysis One Code Desc Transaction Amount Fiscal Period 57.63 Oct-12 12.13 Oct-12-38.90 Oct-12-773.00 Oct-12-800.00 Oct-12-187.00 Oct-12-82.00 Oct-12-82.00 Oct-12-110.00 Oct-12-1115.25 Oct-12-71.00 Oct-12-41.00
USP Strategic Planning and Initiatives
Prescription/Non-Prescription Stakeholder Forum Meeting #6 for 2010-2015 Tuesday, October 21, 2014 USP Strategic Planning and Initiatives Emily M. Kaine, MD Vice President, Strategy Building from our mission,
Foundations of Project Management Advanced Project Executive (TBD) Aerospace at NASA and Systems Management and
LEVELS OF PROJECT LEADERSHIP The levels of project leadership are guideposts as to when during an individual s career a course can be taken. Individuals should attend courses as they see fit to enhance
Federal Segment Architecture Methodology (FSAM): An Overview
Information Resources Management College Federal Segment Architecture Methodology (FSAM): An Overview Dr. Stan Boddie & Prof. Matt Newman 1 a global learning community for government s most promising information
Space Flight Project Work Breakdown Structure
APPENDIX G. (WBS) Space Flight Project Work Breakdown Structure G.1 Introduction G.1.1 The Project Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) is a key element of project management. The purpose of a WBS is to divide
Table of Contents. I. Introduction... 1. II. Goals... 2. III. Sector Guidelines... 3. IV. Cross-Sector Guidelines... 6
National Space transportation policy NOVEMBER 21, 2013 Table of Contents I. Introduction.................................. 1 II. Goals..................................... 2 III. Sector Guidelines................................
Telepresence for Deep Space Missions Project
ABSTRACT Incorporating telepresence technologies into deep space mission operations can give the crew and ground personnel the impression that they are in a location at time that they are not. NASA s space
Performance Dashboards in Local Government: What, Why, and How?
Performance Dashboards in Local Government: What, Why, and How? City of Portland TriMet TSCC Quarterly Meeting August 18, 2015 Dashboards: An Overview What s Driving the Interest in Performance Dashboards?
Roles: Scrum Master & Project Manager
Roles: Scrum Master & Project Manager Scrum Master: Facilitate collaborative meetings Track team performance Remove impediments (Risk, Issue) Validate team alignment to Agile framework and scope Drive
Space Launch System Status Briefing to NAC Space Operations Committee
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Launch System Status Briefing to NAC Space Operations Committee 8 February 2011 Background In response to direction in Section 309 of the NASA Authorization
NASA s FY 2015 Management and Performance
National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA s FY 2015 Management and Performance Governance and Strategic Management Management Priorities and Challenges FY 2014 Performance Plan Update FY 2015
GTA Board of Directors September 4, 2014
GTA Board of Directors September 4, 2014 Our Strategic Vision Our Mission A transparent, integrated enterprise where technology decisions are made with the citizen in mind To provide technology leadership
NASA Enterprise Transition Plan
National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA Enterprise Transition Plan Version #3.2 May 2009 www.nasa.gov NASA Enterprise Architecture Approved By: Bobby German Chief Information Officer (Acting)
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics School of Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Graduate Program (S.M., Ph.D., Sc.D.
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics School of Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Graduate Program (S.M., Ph.D., Sc.D.) Field: Space Propulsion Date: October 15, 2013 1. Introduction
NASA s Intelligent Synthesis Environment Program Revolutionizing the Agency s Engineering and Science Practice
The Voice of the Customer NASA s Intelligent Synthesis Environment Program Revolutionizing the Agency s Engineering and Science Practice An AES PAL Technical Quarterly Journal Robert D. Braun, Ph.D., Chief
Joseph Grant, PhD NASA STTR Program Executive May 1, 2015
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Joseph Grant, PhD NASA STTR Program Executive May 1, 2015 www.nasa.gov Test About the Programs The SBIR and STTR programs were established pursuant to the
Technology management in warship acquisition
management in warship acquisition A J Shanks B.Eng(Hons) MIET BMT Defence Services Limited SYNOPSIS Today s warship designers and engineers look to technology to provide warships and systems better, cheaper
APPLICATION ANNUAL WORK PLAN (ONE OBJECTIVE PER PAGE)
GOVERNANCE Objective 1A Ensure program success through effective governance structures. The successful applicant will be required to work with a representative advisory group developed in consultation
AIDA: Asteroid Impact & Deflection Assessment A Joint ESA-NASA Mission. Joint ESA NASA AIDA Team
AIDA: Asteroid Impact & Deflection Assessment A Joint ESA-NASA Mission Joint ESA NASA AIDA Team Chelyabinsk Meteor on 15 February 2013 AIDA Asteroid Deflection Test AIDA international cooperation First
Esa Mandatory Programme Opportunities as seen by Astrium Satellites. Wolfram Lork // July 07
Esa Mandatory Programme Opportunities as seen by Astrium Satellites Wolfram Lork // July 07 Overview Esa member states are contributing to Esa by mandatory contributions, calculated along GNP Gross National
Science Traceability
Science Traceability Dr. Keith Grogan Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Presented by Dr. Tibor Balint, JPL Introduction Any comprehensive science mission proposal must be able
Draft Strategic Plan for FY 2013-2016
The Public Health Surveillance and Informatics Program Office (Proposed) Draft Strategic Plan for FY 2013-2016 James W. Buehler, MD Director, PHSIPO Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory
NASA REAL PROPERTY ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA REAL PROPERTY ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN An Implementation Plan for Improved Asset Management www.nasa.gov January 2008 A Renewed Spirit of Discovery: The
Business Plan Example. 31 July 2020
Business Plan Example 31 July Index 1. Business Overview 1.1Objectives 1.2Vision Mission and Values 1.3 Keys to Success 2. Business Management 3. Services 2.1 Company Summary 2.2 Company Ownership 2.3
Table of Contents PERFORMANCE REVIEWS STRATEGIC REVIEWS
SECTION 270 PERFORMANCE AND STRATEGIC REVIEWS Table of Contents 270.1 To which agencies does this section apply? 270.2 What is the purpose of this section? PERFORMANCE REVIEWS 270.3 What is the purpose
BIG DATA KICK START. Troy Christensen December 2013
BIG DATA KICK START Troy Christensen December 2013 Big Data Roadmap 1 Define the Target Operating Model 2 Develop Implementation Scope and Approach 3 Progress Key Data Management Capabilities 4 Transition
ClOP CHAPTER 1351.39. Departmental Information Technology Governance Policy TABLE OF CONTENTS. Section 39.1
ClOP CHAPTER 1351.39 Departmental Information Technology Governance Policy TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 39.1 Purpose... 1 Section 39.2 Section 39.3 Section 39.4 Section 39.5 Section 39.6 Section 39.7 Section
Improving Government Performance in the U.S. Betsy Newcomer Office of Management and Budget Executive Office of the President
Improving Government Performance in the U.S. Betsy Newcomer Office of Management and Budget Executive Office of the President Our Office s Mission Lead the Federal government s efforts to improve outcomes
Measuring the Maturity of Robotic Planetary Mission Concepts II
SpaceOps 2010 ConferenceDelivering on the DreamHosted by NASA Mars 25-30 April 2010, Huntsville, Alabama AIAA 2010-2034 Measuring the Maturity of Robotic Planetary Mission Concepts
GOVERNMENT USE OF MOBILE TECHNOLOGY
GOVERNMENT USE OF MOBILE TECHNOLOGY Barriers, Opportunities, and Gap Analysis DECEMBER 2012 Product of the Digital Services Advisory Group and Federal Chief Information Officers Council Contents Introduction...
Regolith-Derived Heat Shield for Planetary Body Entry and Descent System with In-Situ Fabrication
Regolith-Derived Heat Shield for Planetary Body Entry and Descent System with In-Situ Fabrication Michael D. Hogue, NASA Kennedy Space Center Robert P. Mueller, NASA Kennedy Space Center Laurent Sibille,
AT&T Global Network Client for Windows Product Support Matrix January 29, 2015
AT&T Global Network Client for Windows Product Support Matrix January 29, 2015 Product Support Matrix Following is the Product Support Matrix for the AT&T Global Network Client. See the AT&T Global Network
Sputnik and the Space Race. By: AJ Scangamor and Joseph Reed
Sputnik and the Space Race By: AJ Scangamor and Joseph Reed Background After WWII ended the Cold War had just begun. Within this war between two great powers competed in the battle of the Space Race, the
Solar Power for Outer Planets Study
Solar Power for Outer Planets Study Presentation to Outer Planets Assessment Group November 8, 2007 Scott W. Benson/NASA Glenn Research Center 1 Background & Outline Alan Stern request: a quick look study
Information Resources Management (IRM) Strategic Plan
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Information Resources Management (IRM) Strategic Plan Office of the Chief Information Officer March 2014 www.nasa.gov NASA IRM Strategic Plan CIO s Introductory
Update on Program Management Services for Urban Water Management Plan Implementation. Department of Public Utilities
Update on Program Management Services for Urban Water Management Plan Implementation Department of Public Utilities September 24, 2015 Discussion Topics Capital Program Local Participation Upcoming Construction
Technical Writing - A Review of Agile Software Development Services
Enchantment Chapter Monthly Meeting 10 June, 2015 4:45-6:00 pm: Systems Engineering for Software Intensive Projects using Agile Methods Larri Rosser, Raytheon Intelligence, Information & Services, Sr.
From: Steve Berberich, Vice President of Technology and Corporate Services and Chief Financial Officer
California Independent System Operator Corporation Memorandum To: ISO Board of Governors From: Steve Berberich, Vice President of Technology and Corporate Services and Chief Financial Officer Date: September
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Plan of Action Strategic Workforce Planning
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Plan of Action Strategic Workforce Planning January 19, 2001 Strategic Workforce Planning Plan of Action January 19, 2001 Content Overview This plan of action outlines
STATE OF HAWAII CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER AND THE OFFICE OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY UPDATE ON THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLAN
STATE OF HAWAII CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER AND OFFICE OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY REPORT ON UPDATE ON THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLAN DECEMBER 2011 SUBMITTED TO THE TWENTY-SIXTH STATE
NASA S MANAGEMENT OF THE MARS SCIENCE LABORATORY PROJECT
JUNE 8, 2011 AUDIT REPORT OFFICE OF AUDITS NASA S MANAGEMENT OF THE MARS SCIENCE LABORATORY PROJECT OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL National Aeronautics and Space Administration REPORT NO. IG-11-019 (ASSIGNMENT
IBM IT Architect Certification Overview
IBM Architect Profession IBM IT Architect Certification Overview Agenda How do I grow a great career? What does an Architect professional do in IBM? Career path for Architects IBM Career Framework Q&A
Hyperspectral Satellite Imaging Planning a Mission
Hyperspectral Satellite Imaging Planning a Mission Victor Gardner University of Maryland 2007 AIAA Region 1 Mid-Atlantic Student Conference National Institute of Aerospace, Langley, VA Outline Objective
The USGS Landsat Big Data Challenge
The USGS Landsat Big Data Challenge Brian Sauer Engineering and Development USGS EROS [email protected] U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS EROS and Landsat 2 Data Utility and Exploitation
KPMG Digital Marketing case study WEC USA September 2012
KPMG Digital Marketing case study WEC USA September 2012 2012 KPMG International Cooperative ( KPMG International ), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated
THE NATIONAL SPACE WEATHER PROGRAM
1 Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research (OFCM) THE NATIONAL SPACE WEATHER PROGRAM Committee on Solar and Space Physics National Research Council Space Studies
5 FAM 670 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT
5 FAM 670 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT (CT:IM-92; 08-01-2007) (Office of Origin: IRM/BPC/PRG) 5 FAM 671 WHAT ARE IT PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND WHY ARE THEY REQUIRED?
GAO COMBATING TERRORISM. Comments on Counterterrorism Leadership and National Strategy. Testimony
GAO United States General Accounting Office Testimony Before the Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations, Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives
Appendix B: Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)
: Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) B.1. Introduction The WBS and WBS dictionary are effective management processes for planning, organizing, and administering NASA programs and projects. In accordance with
Building Executable Enterprise Architecture: Framework and Practice. Presentation to a/ea. May 10, 2006
Building Executable Enterprise Architecture: Framework and Practice Presentation to a/ea May 10, 2006 Challenges in EA Existing EA frameworks emphasize on how to develop EA, not on how to use EA Need a
System Engineering: A Traditional Discipline in a Non-traditional Organization
System Engineering: A Traditional Discipline in a Non-traditional Organization Corporate Overview Founded with the singular goal of providing highly reliable space transportation Tech-style Organization
Information Technology Management Marshall Space Flight Center
Information Technology Management Marshall Space Flight Center Jonathan Pettus January 31, 2013 NASA Around the Country Glenn Research Center Aeronautics and Spacecraft Technology Cleveland, Ohio Ames
Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework
Resource Optimization Reporting January 29, 2013 Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework Version 2 Service Delivery Governance Current Views Human Capital Mgmt. (KSAs) Enterprise Strategic Plan/Goals
Training Programme 2014
C A PA C I T Y D E V E LO P M E N T P R O G R A M M E S 2 0 1 4 Training Programme 2014 Economic and Social Research Foundation (ESRF) Research Capacity Building Knowledge Management CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT
Updates from CMS: Value-Based Purchasing, ACOs, and Other Initiatives The Seventh National Pay for Performance Summit March 19, 2012
Updates from CMS: Value-Based Purchasing, ACOs, and Other Initiatives The Seventh National Pay for Performance Summit March 19, 2012 Presenters David Sayen, CMS Regional Administrator Betsy L. Thompson,
Automated Spacecraft Scheduling The ASTER Example
Automated Spacecraft Scheduling The ASTER Example Ron Cohen [email protected] Ground System Architectures Workshop 2002 Jet Propulsion Laboratory The Concept Scheduling by software instead of
Briefing Outline. Overview of the CUI Program. CUI and IT Implementation
Briefing Outline Overview of the CUI Program Establishment of the Program Elements of the CUI Executive Order Categories and Registry Handling CUI Current Efforts Implementation Plan CUI and IT Implementation
BUILDING TRANSATLANTIC PARTNERSHIPS IN SPACE EXPLORATION THE MPCV-SM STUDY
BUILDING TRANSATLANTIC PARTNERSHIPS IN SPACE EXPLORATION THE MPCV-SM STUDY Following the approval of the ESA ISS Exploitation Declaration for the ISS lifetime at the ESA Council Meeting in March 2011,
Natural Gas Wholesale Prices at PG&E Citygate as of November 7, 2006
QUARTERLY GAS ISSUES UPDATE December 26 I. Supply Issues Wholesale Natural Gas Prices Above normal temperatures and a lack of hurricane activity caused market prices to decrease in October. By November,
Maximizing the Utility of Your Tool Set for Project Support
2013 NASA Cost Analysis Symposium Maximizing the Utility of Your Tool Set for Project Support Bob Sefcik, Glenn Research Center Tom Parkey, Glenn Research Center August 28, 2013 www.nasa.gov Glenn Research
COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*
COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) 2 Fixed Rates Variable Rates FIXED RATES OF THE PAST 25 YEARS AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LENDING RATE - 5 YEAR* (Per cent) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*
COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) 2 Fixed Rates Variable Rates FIXED RATES OF THE PAST 25 YEARS AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LENDING RATE - 5 YEAR* (Per cent) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
