Charting Outcomes in the Match

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Charting Outcomes in the Match"

Transcription

1 ing Outcomes in the Match Characteristics of Applicants Who to Their Preferred Specialty in the 29 Main Residency Match 3rd Edition Prepared by: National Resident Matching Program and Association of American Medical Colleges August

2 An earlier version of Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29 contained significant errors that have been corrected. Questions about the contents of this publication may be directed to Julia Raether, Director of Research, National Resident Matching Program, (22) or Questions about the NRMP should be directed to Mona Signer, Executive Director, National Resident Matching Program, (22) or Questions about the AAMC data collections may be directed to Paul Jolly, Ph.D., Senior Director, Association of American Medical Colleges, (22) or The work of Philip Szenas in the preparation of this report is gratefully acknowledged. Copyright 29 National Resident Matching Program and the Association of American Medical Colleges. All materials subject to this copyright may be photocopied for the purpose of nonprofit, scientific, or educational advancement.

3 29 Table of Contents Introduction... ii Tables and Charts for All Specialties Chart 1. Active Applicants in the 29 Main Residency Match...2 Table 1. Number of Applicants and Positions in the 29 Main Residency Match...3 Chart 2. Ratio - Applicants Ranking Specialty First / Available Positions...4 Chart 3. Match Rates...5 Table 2. Summary Statistics...6 Chart 4. Median Number of Contiguous Ranks...7 Chart 5. Mean Number of Different Specialties Ranked...8 Chart 6. USMLE Step 1 Scores of Applicants...9 Chart 7. USMLE Step 2 Scores of Applicants...1 Chart 8. Mean Number of Research Experiences...11 Chart 9. Mean Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications...12 Chart 1. Mean Number of Work Experiences...13 Chart 11. Mean Number of Volunteer Experiences...14 Chart 12. Percentage of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Who are Members of AOA...15 Chart 13. Percentage of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Graduating from One of the 4 Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding...16 Chart 14. Percentage of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Who Have a Graduate Degree...17 Tables and Charts for Individual Specialties Anesthesiology...18 Dermatology...31 Diagnostic Radiology...44 Emergency Medicine...57 Family Medicine...7 General Surgery...83 Internal Medicine...96 Internal Medicine/Pediatrics...19 Neurology Neurosurgery Obstetrics and Gynecology Orthopaedic Surgery Otolaryngology Pathology-Anatomic and Clinical Pediatrics...2 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Transitional Year Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. i Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

4 29 Introduction The first edition of Charting Outcomes in the Match was published in August 26 using data from the 25 Main Residency Match. The second edition, published in August 27 and based on the 27 Match, built on the original report by adding two specialties (Otolaryngology and Neurology), incorporating several additional measures, and conducting regression analyses to predict match success. The 29 report is based on the 29 Match and includes one new specialty (Neurological Surgery) and two new measures (number of work and volunteer experiences). For this edition, the regression analyses have been replaced with two graphs for each specialty showing the relationship between the number of contiguous programs ranked (number of programs in the firstchoice specialty before another specialty appears on the rank order list) and USMLE Step 1 scores and the probability of matching to the preferred specialty. These changes should provide more useful information for applicants and advisors as they prepare for the Match. For the purposes of this report, match success is defined as a match to the specialty of the applicant s first-ranked program, because that is assumed to be the specialty of choice. Lack of success includes matching to another specialty as well as failure to match at all. No distinction was made based on whether applicants matched to their first, second, third, or last choice. Combining data from the NRMP, the database of AAMC s Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS), USMLE scores made available by the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) and the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG), and other AAMC data sources, we identified twelve applicant characteristics. NBME and ECFMG have granted permission to use USMLE scores, and the National Resident Matching Program and the Association of American Medical Colleges have collaborated to produce this report. Because graduating seniors from U.S. allopathic medical schools match at higher rates than do other applicant groups, and because some of those groups contain small numbers of applicants, this report distinguishes only two types of applicants: U.S. seniors and independent applicants. 1 It should be noted, however, that the independent applicant category is a heterogeneous group. Moreover, because independent applicants match to their preferred specialties at much lower rates than do U.S. seniors, the specialty-specific probability graphs for independent applicants are less predictive of success. Summary Some general observations apply to all of the specialties in this report. Applicants who are successful in matching to their preferred specialty are more likely to: Rank more programs within their preferred specialty Be U.S. seniors Have higher USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 scores Be members of AOA Although some other measures seemed to be related to match success for some specialties, the relationships were not consistent enough to draw broad conclusions across specialties. In addition, the data sources used for Charting Outcomes do not include other important applicant factors such as course evaluations, reference letters, and the Medical School Performance Evaluation. Despite the fairly strong relationship between USMLE Step scores and match success, the distributions of scores show that program directors consider other qualifications, and a high score is not a guarantee of success. Even in the most competitive specialties a few individuals with higher scores are not successful. Neither is a lower score a bar to success. In the less competitive specialties, U.S. seniors with scores slightly above passing usually match to their preferred specialties. The data also are reassuring because they indicate that at least some programs do not employ an arbitrary cutoff or decline to consider applicants with less than excellent test performance. The data in this report support the following straightforward advice one should give to an applicant. Rank all of the programs you really want, without regard to your estimate of your chances with those programs. Include a mix of both highly competitive and less competitive programs within your preferred specialty. Include all of the programs on your list where the program has expressed an interest in you and where you would accept a position. If you are applying to a competitive specialty and you would want to have a residency position in the event you are unsuccessful in matching to a program in your preferred specialty, also rank your most preferred programs in an alternate specialty. Include all of your qualifications in your application, but know that you do not have to be AOA, to have the highest USMLE scores, to have publications, or to have participated in research projects to match successfully. Program directors and applicants will find the tables and charts for the specialty of their particular interest later in this report. For questions, comments or more information, please contact: Julia Raether, Director of Research National Resident Matching Program Tel: (22) [email protected] Or Paul Jolly, Ph.D., Senior Director, Special Studies Association of American Medical Colleges Tel: (22) [email protected] 1 Independent applicants are defined on page 2. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. ii Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

5 Tables and Charts for All Specialties Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 1 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

6 1 Active Applicants in the 29 Main Residency Match by Applicant Type Students/Graduates of Fifth Pathway Programs 16 Students/Graduates of Canadian Medical Schools 35 Students/Graduates of Osteopathic Medical Schools 2,13 U.S. Citizen Students/Graduates of International Medical Schools 3,39 Seniors of U.S. Allopathic Medical Schools 15,638 Non-U.S. Citizen Students/Graduates of International Medical Schools 7,484 Previous Graduates of U.S. Allopathic Medical Schools 1,222 Chart 1 shows the number of active applicants (applicants who submitted rank order lists of programs) by applicant type. U.S. allopathic medical school seniors constitute 52.3 percent of the applicants in this report. The next largest group is non-u.s. citizen students and graduates of international medical schools (25.%). For the remainder of this report, all applicants who are not U.S. allopathic seniors will be grouped into the "independent applicants" category. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 2 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

7 Table 1 Number of Applicants and Positions in the 29 Main Residency Match by Preferred Specialty Preferred Specialty Total Positions Offered Total Number of Applicants Number of Applicants Not Per Position Table 1 provides a summary of the numbers of applicants and positions for selected specialties. Only those specialties offering 5 or more positions are included. The numbers of applicants matched by applicant type (U.S. senior and independent applicants) also are provided in this table. Not Anesthesiology 1,374 1, , Dermatology Emergency Medicine 1,515 1, , Family Medicine 2,535 3, , ,266 Internal Medicine 5,169 7, , ,113 2,792 Neurological Surgery Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology 1,185 1, Orthopaedic Surgery Otolaryngology Pathology-Anatomic and Clinical Pediatrics 2,471 2, , Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Plastic Surgery Psychiatry 1,63 1, Diagnostic Radiology 1,95 1, Radiation Oncology General Surgery 1,65 1, Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Transitional Year *Preferred specialty is the specialty ranked first on an applicant's rank order list, excluding preliminary programs in specialties except Transitional Year. Note: Only integrated Plastic Surgery programs participate in the National Resident Matching Program. For those specialties where both exist, PGY-1 and PGY-2 positions have been combined Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 3 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

8 2 Ratio - Applicants Ranking Specialty First / Available Positions by Preferred Specialty Anesthesiology Dermatology Diagnostic Radiology Emergency Medicine Family Medicine General Surgery Internal Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurological Surgery Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Orthopaedic Surgery Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Transitional Year Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Chart 2 shows the ratios of U.S. seniors and independent applicants to available positions in each specialty. All specialties except Dermatology, Neurological Surgery, Orthopaedic Surgery, Otolaryngology, and Plastic Surgery have enough positions to accommodate all U.S. seniors who prefer that specialty. As the number of applicants has increased in recent years, fewer specialties have offered enough positions for all applicants who prefer that specialty. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 4 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

9 3 Match Rates Percent by Preferred Specialty and Applicant Type Anesthesiology Dermatology Diagnostic Radiology Emergency Medicine Family Medicine General Surgery Internal Medicine Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurological Surgery Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Orthopaedic Surgery Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Transitional Year Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Chart 3 shows the percentages of U.S. seniors and independent applicants who matched to their preferred specialty. Overall, 91.2 percent U.S. seniors matched to their preferred specialty, ranging from a high of 98.1 percent (Pediatrics) to a low of 52.5 percent (Plastic Surgery). For independent applicants, the overall match rate was 43.9 percent, ranging from a high of 58.2 percent (Neurology) to a low of 21.3 percent (Otolaryngology). In general, independent applicants are less successful in matching to their preferred specialty than are U.S. seniors. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 5 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

10 Table 2 Summary Statistics All Specialties Combined Unmatched Unmatched Measure (n=13,646) (n=1,312) (n=6,41) (n=7,718) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members n/a n/a 1. Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S n/a n/a medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources. Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 3 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Table 2 provides summary statistics by applicant type and match outcome on the 12 measures presented in this report. Data on each of these measures will be displayed graphically by preferred specialty on the following pages. Of the 12 measures, only the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 and Step 2 scores had significant missing data. Overall, there were Step 1 scores for 92.9 percent of applicants. Almost all of the applicants who did not have Step 1 scores were osteopathic medical school seniors and graduates who either take an alternative examination (the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination, or COMLEX-USA) or who take the USMLE exams but whose data are not shared with the AAMC. Step 2 scores were available for 79. percent of the applicants. In addition to missing Step 2 scores for the osteopathic applicants, only 73.2 percent of U.S. seniors had Step 2 scores. The missing data for U.S. seniors can be attributed to the fact that few medical schools require students to take and/or pass the Step 2 examination prior to the NRMP's rank order list deadline. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 6 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

11 Anesthesiology Dermatology Median Number of Contiguous Ranks by Preferred Specialty, Applicant Type, and Match Status Diagnostic Radiology 1 Emergency Medicine Family Medicine 6 2 Anesthesiology 3 1 Dermatology 5 6 Diagnostic Radiology Emergency Medicine Family Medicine 11 General Surgery General Surgery Neurological Surgery Internal Medicine Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurological Surgery Internal Medicine Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Not Orthopaedic Surgery Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Not 1 6 Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Orthopaedic Surgery 11 4 Otolaryngology Otolaryngology Pathology Pathology 3 Pediatrics Physical Medicine 1 1 Pediatrics 7 Physical Medicine 9 Plastic Surgery Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology 6 2 Psychiatry Radiation Oncology 2 1 Transitional Year Transitional Year Source: NRMP Data Warehouse In general, applicants are more likely to be successful if they rank more programs in their desired specialty. To quantify this aspect of applicant behavior, we tallied the number of programs ranked in the first-choice specialty before a program in another specialty appeared on the applicant's rank order list. Chart 4 provides the median number of contiguous ranks by preferred specialty for U.S. seniors and independent applicants who matched and did not match. The top panel shows significant variation across the specialties for U.S. seniors. Neurological Surgery had the longest average contiguous rank list for matched U.S. seniors (13) and Family Medicine (6) and Transitional Year (2) had the shortest. In general, U.S. senior applicants who preferred the more competitive specialties submitted longer contiguous lists. For all specialties U.S. seniors who matched to their preferred specialty had median contiguous rank lists that were longer than U.S. seniors who did not match. A similar pattern can be found for independent applicants, although their lists are shorter than the lists submitted by U.S. seniors. Independent applicants who matched had longer contiguous lists compared with independent applicants who did not match to their preferred specialty. The principal message of these graphs is that applicants with longer rank order lists are more successful than those with shorter ones. The NRMP has been recommending longer list for many years, but some applicants apparently do not heed the advice. Others may have shorter lists because they found only a few programs willing to entertain their applications or because they could not afford a large number of interview trips. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 7 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

12 5 Mean Number of Different Specialties Ranked by Preferred Specialty, Applicant Type, and Match Status 2.5 Not Anesthesiology Dermatology Diagnostic Radiology Emergency Medicine Family Medicine General Surgery Internal Medicine Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurological Surgery Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Orthopaedic Surgery Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Transitional Year Not Anesthesiology Dermatology Diagnostic Radiology Emergency Medicine Family Medicine General Surgery Internal Medicine Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurological Surgery Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Orthopaedic Surgery Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Transitional Year Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Some applicants are interested in a single specialty while others consider two or more. Chart 5 displays the average number of different specialties ranked by applicant type, preferred specialty, and match outcome. The top chart shows the data for U.S. seniors. In general, seniors who preferred the more competitive specialties were more likely to rank more than one specialty. For almost all specialties, seniors who did not match to their preferred specialty were more likely to rank more than one specialty compared to seniors who matched. A similar pattern can be seen for the independent applicants, although on average they were more likely to rank more than one specialty when compared with U.S. seniors. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 8 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

13 6 USMLE Step 1 Scores of Applicants by Preferred Specialty and Applicant Type Anesthesiology Dermatology Diagnostic Radiology Emergency Medicine Family Medicine General Surgery Internal Medicine Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurological Surgery Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Orthopaedic Surgery Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Transitional Year Anesthesiology Dermatology Diagnostic Radiology Emergency Medicine Family Medicine General Surgery Internal Medicine Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurological Surgery Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Orthopaedic Surgery Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Transitional Year Sources: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Step 1 scores are not available for the majority of Osteopathic seniors and graduates included within the independent applicant category. Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. USMLE Step 1 scores are a measure of a student s understanding of important basic science concepts and the ability to apply that knowledge to the practice of medicine. Although such knowledge is only one facet of applicant qualifications considered by program directors in their selection process, it is the only one that is comparable across applicants, and available during the interview season and prior to the NRMP s ranking deadline. Overall, U.S. senior applicants have mean USMLE Step 1 scores of (s.d. = 19.6) and independent applicants have mean scores of 211. (s.d. = 19.7), both well above the minimum passing score of 182. Chart 6 displays the Step 1 scores for matched U.S. seniors (top panel) and independent applicants (bottom panel) by specialty. The horizontal bars are the median values for successful applicants and the vertical lines show the interquartile ranges (the range of scores for applicants excluding the top and bottom quarters of the distribution). Scores generally are higher for the more competitive specialties, but there is substantial overlap when specialties are compared. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 9 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

14 7 USMLE Step 2 Scores of Applicants by Preferred Specialty and Applicant Type Anesthesiology Dermatology Diagnostic Radiology Emergency Medicine Family Medicine General Surgery Internal Medicine Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurological Surgery Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Orthopaedic Surgery Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Transitional Year Anesthesiology Dermatology Diagnostic Radiology Emergency Medicine Family Medicine General Surgery Internal Medicine Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurological Surgery Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Orthopaedic Surgery Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Transitional Year Sources: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Approximately 3 percent of U.S. seniors did not take the Step 2 examination in time to be included in this report. Step 2 scores are not available for the majority of Osteopathic seniors and graduates included within the independent applicant category. Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. USMLE Step 2 scores are a measure of an applicant's ability to apply the medical knowledge, skills, and understanding of clinical science essential for providing patient care. Overall, U.S. senior applicants had mean USMLE step 2 scores of (s.d. = 21.8) and independent applicants had mean scores of (s.d. = 21.3), both well above the minimum passing score of 182. Chart 7 shows the Step 2 scores for matched U.S. seniors (top panel) and independent applicants (bottom panel) who matched by preferred specialty. The horizontal bars are the median values for successful applicants and the vertical lines show the interquartile ranges. As was the case for the Step 1 scores, the more competitive specialties have higher average Step 2 scores. For some specialties (e.g., Plastic Surgery, Family Medicine) the differences in median Step 2 scores between matched U.S. seniors and independent applicants are quite dramatic; other specialties (e.g., Neurological Surgery, Anesthesiology) show only minor differences. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 1 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

15 8 Mean Number of Research Experiences by Preferred Specialty, Applicant Type, and Match Status 4.5 Not Anesthesiology Dermatology Diagnostic Radiology Emergency Medicine Family Medicine General Surgery Internal Medicine Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurological Surgery Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Orthopaedic Surgery Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehab. Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Transitional Year Anesthesiology Dermatology Diagnostic Radiology Not Emergency Medicine Family Medicine General Surgery Internal Medicine Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurological Surgery Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Orthopaedic Surgery Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehab Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Transitional Year Sources: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse The ERAS application allows applicants to self-report their participation in research projects. These experiences are not verified or evaluated and may vary greatly. Chart 8 shows the average number of research experiences by applicant type, preferred specialty, and match outcome. U.S. seniors averaged 2.2 research experiences with 83.6 percent reporting at least one experience. Independent applicants reported, on average, fewer experiences (1.3), and a smaller percentage (58.6%) listed having any research experiences. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 11 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

16 9 Mean Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications by Preferred Specialty, Applicant Type, and Match Status Not Anesthesiology Dermatology Diagnostic Radiology Emergency Medicine Family Medicine General Surgery Internal Medicine Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurological Surgery Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Orthopaedic Surgery Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehab. Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Transitional Year 18. Not Anesthesiology Dermatology Diagnostic Radiology Emergency Medicine Family Medicine General Surgery Internal Medicine Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurological Surgery Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Orthopaedic Surgery Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehab Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Transitional Year Sources: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. The ERAS application also permits applicants to list their publications. This information is self-reported and may include peer-reviewed articles, abstracts, poster sessions, and invited national or regional presentations. Some residency programs may independently verify and even review publications for applicants in whom they have an interest, but most probably do not. Many applicants report abstracts, presentation, or publications, sometimes dozens or even hundreds. In the individual specialty sections, we distinguish between no publications, 1 to 5 publications, and more than 5 publications. Chart 9 shows the average number of publications by applicant type, preferred specialty, and match outcome. U.S. seniors averaged 2.9 publications with 64. percent reporting at least one publication. Independent applicants reported, on average, slightly fewer experiences (2.6); however, a smaller percentage (48.7%) listed any publications. As one might expect, the averages are higher for the more competitive specialties. And for Dermatology, Neurological Surgery, Plastic Surgery, and Radiation Oncology matched U.S. seniors reported significantly more publications when compared with unmatched seniors. Independent applicants followed a similar pattern. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 12 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

17 1 Mean Number of Work Experiences by Preferred Specialty, Applicant Type, and Match Status Not Anesthesiology Dermatology Diagnostic Radiology Emergency Medicine Family Medicine General Surgery Internal Medicine Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurological Surgery Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Orthopaedic Surgery Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehab. Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Transitional Year 5. Not Anesthesiology Dermatology Diagnostic Radiology Emergency Medicine Family Medicine General Surgery Internal Medicine Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurological Surgery Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Orthopaedic Surgery Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehab. Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Transitional Year Sources: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Chart 1 shows the average number of work experiences reported on the ERAS application by applicant type, preferred specialty, and match outcome. There is little variation across specialties or within specialties (matched or not matched) for either the U.S. seniors or independent applicants. Across all specialties, however, independent applicants averaged more work experiences than U.S. seniors (3.5 versus 2.7), and a higher proportion of independent applicants (89.% versus 84.8%) reported at least one work experience. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 13 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

18 11 Mean Number of Volunteer Experiences by Preferred Specialty, Applicant Type, and Match Status Anesthesiology Dermatology Diagnostic Radiology Emergency Medicine Family Medicine Anesthesiology Dermatology Diagnostic Radiology Emergency Medicine General Surgery Family Medicine Not Neurological Surgery Internal Medicine Internal Medicine/Pediatrics 3.6 General Surgery Not Internal Medicine Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurological Surgery Orthopaedic Surgery Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Orthopaedic Surgery Otolaryngology Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehab Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehab Plastic Surgery Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Transitional Year Transitional Year Sources: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Chart 11 provides the average number of volunteer experiences reported on the ERAS application by applicant type, preferred specialty, and match outcome. U.S. seniors who matched to Internal Medicine/Pediatrics averaged significantly more volunteer experiences than did unmatched seniors who preferred that specialty (7.8 versus 4.8). U.S. seniors in all specialties averaged more volunteer experiences when compared to unmatched seniors in the same specialties, with several averaging at least one more experience. A similar pattern can be found for independent applicants. applicants generally had more volunteer experiences when compared to unmatched applicants. Overall, U.S. seniors averaged twice as many volunteer experiences compared to independent applicants (6.2 versus 2.9), and a higher percentage of U.S. seniors (95.2% versus 72.2%) reported at least one volunteer experience. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 14 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

19 12 Percentage of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Who are Members of AOA by Preferred Specialty and Match Status 6 Not 5 51 Percentage Anesthesiology Dermatology Emergency Medicine Diagnostic Radiology Family Medicine General Surgery Internal Medicine Neurological Surgery Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurology Orthopaedic Surgery Obstetrics and Gynecology Otolaryngology 4 Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehab. Plastic Surgery 4 3 Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Transitional Year Sources: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Membership in Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA), the national medical honor society, is an honor reserved for students with high academic achievement. AOA membership is limited to students in medical schools that sponsor an AOA chapter. Most, but not all, allopathic schools in the U.S. and Canada participate, and there is one foreign chapter in Beirut. Among the independent applicants, only graduate U.S. physicians, Canadians, and a small number of others could legitimately claim membership. For that reason, AOA status for each specialty in Chart 9 is reported only for U.S. seniors. Data on AOA membership are self-reported on the ERAS application. Even for U.S. seniors, however, an analysis of its relationship with success in the Match is limited by the relatively small number of applicants who are members, by the fact that some schools do not have AOA chapters, and by the fact that other schools elect AOA members too late in the academic year for it to be considered in the application process. Overall, 14.7 percent of U.S. seniors included in this report claimed AOA membership on their ERAS application. Among applicants who matched to their preferred specialty, 15.3 percent reported AOA membership, compared to 6.3 percent of unmatched applicants. As with several of the other measures, the most competitive specialties are able to attract the greatest proportion of AOA members. All specialties attract some AOA applicants, but for most specialties AOA members account for fewer than one in five successful applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 15 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

20 13 Percentage of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Graduating from One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding* by Preferred Specialty and Match Status 6 Not Percentage Anesthesiology Dermatology Diagnostic Radiology Emergency Medicine Family Medicine General Surgery Internal Medicine Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurological Surgery Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Orthopaedic Surgery Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehab. Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Transitional Year Sources: NRMP Data Warehouse, NIH *Source: Medical Schools Only.xls. Total awards include both direct and indirect costs. Awards to the 127 U.S. allopathic medical schools ranged from $1.8 to $422 million. The 4 medical schools with the highest NIH funding received $1 million or more. Some program directors may give preference to applicants with research experience or who graduated from a research-intensive medical school. To test this assumption, we obtained data on the amount of NIH grant awards and identified the 4 schools with the highest NIH funding ($1 million or more). This measure, by definition, is limited to graduates of U.S. medical schools. Overall, 35. percent of matched and 29.4 percent of unmatched U.S. seniors were graduates of one of the 4 medical schools with the highest NIH funding. Chart 13 shows the percentage of U.S. seniors who graduated from those schools by specialty and match outcome. For example, 32 percent of U.S. seniors who matched in Anesthesiology were graduates of one of the 4 medical schools with the highest NIH funding and 25 percent of seniors who did not match in Anesthesiology were graduates of those schools. Radiation Oncology had the highest percentage of matched U.S. seniors who were graduates of a medical school with the highest NIH funding. Plastic Surgery, Dermatology, Neurological Surgery, and Transitional Year also had higher percentages of matched applicants from those schools compared to the other specialties. For all specialties except Internal Medicine/Pediatrics and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, smaller percentages of seniors who did not match to their preferred specialty were graduates of a medical school with the highest NIH funding compared to seniors who matched. The average across all specialties and match outcome was 34.2 percent. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 16 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

21 14 Percentage of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Who Have a Graduate Degree 35 Other Graduate Degree Ph.D. 3 1 Percentage Anesthesiology Dermatology Emergency Medicine Diagnostic Radiology Family Medicine General Surgery Internal Medicine Neurological Surgery Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurology Orthopaedic Surgery Obstetrics and Gynecology Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehab. Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Transitional Year Sources: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Chart 14 shows by preferred specialty the percentage of matched U.S. allopathic seniors who have a graduate degree. Radiation Oncology, Anatomic and Clinical Pathology, Dermatology, Neurological Surgery, and Neurology had the highest percentages of matched applicants with Ph.D.s, and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Internal Medicine/Pediatrics, and Neurological Surgery had the highest percentages with other graduate degrees. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 17 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

22 AN Anesthesiology Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 18 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

23 Table AN-1 Summary Statistics Anesthesiology Unmatched Unmatched Measure (n=1,13) (n=91) (n=225) (n=31) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members n/a n/a 1. Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S n/a n/a medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources. Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 3 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 19 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

24 AN-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Anesthesiology 28 Not or More Contiguous Ranks 28 Not or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 2 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

25 Graph AN-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Anesthesiology 1. Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 21 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

26 AN-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Anesthesiology 1, 85 Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 1, Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 22 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

27 AN-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Anesthesiology Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and Between 21 and 21 Between 211 Between 221 and 22 and 23 Step 1 Scores Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 23 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

28 Graph AN-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Anesthesiology 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 24 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

29 AN-4 USMLE Step 2 Scores Anesthesiology Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and 2 Not 83 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 Step 2 Scores 158 Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 Step 2 Scores Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 25 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

30 AN-5 Number of Research Projects Anesthesiology Not None or More Research Projects Not None or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 26 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

31 AN-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Anesthesiology Not None or More Publications Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 27 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

32 AN-7 Number of Work Experiences Anesthesiology Not None or More Work Experiences 24 Not None or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 28 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

33 AN-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Anesthesiology 2 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 29 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

34 AN-9 Other Characteristics of Anesthesiology 1, 993 AOA Membership Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding 8 Not No 9 11 Yes No 68 Yes 23 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree 1,2 1,77 1, 978 1, No 9 26 Yes 1 2 No Yes 16 Sources. AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 3 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

35 DM Dermatology Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 31 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

36 Table DM-1 Summary Statistics Dermatology Unmatched Unmatched Measure (n=286) (n=125) (n=48) (n=18) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members n/a n/a 1. Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S n/a n/a medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources. Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 3 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 32 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

37 DM-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Dermatology 7 Not or More Contiguous Ranks Not or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 33 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

38 Graph DM-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Dermatology 1. Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 34 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

39 DM-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Dermatology Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 6 14 Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 35 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

40 DM-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Dermatology Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 Step 1 Scores 34 Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown 1 Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Step 1 Scores Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 36 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

41 Graph DM-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Dermatology 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 37 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

42 DM-4 USMLE Step 2 Scores Dermatology Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Not Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 9 Between 221 and 23 Step 2 Scores Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown <= 18 Between 181 and 19 1 Between 191 and Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 38 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

43 DM-5 Number of Research Projects Dermatology Not None or More Research Projects Not None or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 39 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

44 DM-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Dermatology 16 Not None or More Publications Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 4 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

45 DM-7 Number of Work Experiences Dermatology Not None or More Work Experiences 8 Not None or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 41 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

46 DM-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Dermatology 1 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 42 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

47 DM-9 Other Characteristics of Dermatology AOA Membership Not Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding No Yes No Yes Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree No 32 Yes 2 4 No 28 Yes 1 Sources. AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 43 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

48 DR Diagnostic Radiology Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 44 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

49 Table DR-1 Summary Statistics Diagnostic Radiology Unmatched Unmatched Measure (n=931) (n=155) (n=134) (n=257) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members n/a n/a 1. Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S n/a n/a medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources. Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 3 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 45 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

50 DR-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Diagnostic Radiology 2 Not or More Contiguous Ranks 2 Not or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 46 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

51 Graph DR-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Diagnostic Radiology 1. Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 47 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

52 DR-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Diagnostic Radiology 6 55 Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 5 6 Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 48 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

53 DR-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Diagnostic Radiology Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 Between 221 and 22 and 23 Step 1 Scores Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 Step 1 Scores Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 49 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

54 Graph DR-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Diagnostic Radiology 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 5 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

55 DR-4 USMLE Step 2 Scores Diagnostic Radiology 4 35 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Not 16 Between 21 and Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Step 2 Scores Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Step 2 Scores Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 51 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

56 DR-5 Number of Research Projects Diagnostic Radiology Not None or More Research Projects 18 Not None or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 52 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

57 DR-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Diagnostic Radiology Not None or More Publications Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 53 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

58 DR-7 Number of Work Experiences Diagnostic Radiology Not None or More Work Experiences Not None or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 54 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

59 DR-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Diagnostic Radiology Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 55 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

60 DR-9 Other Characteristics of Diagnostic Radiology AOA Membership Not 7 6 Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding No Yes No Yes 41 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree 1, No Yes No Yes 27 Sources. AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 56 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

61 EM Emergency Medicine Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 57 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

62 Table EM-1 Summary Statistics Emergency Medicine Unmatched Unmatched Measure (n=1,153) (n=92) (n=317) (n=255) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members n/a n/a 1. Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S n/a n/a medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources. Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 3 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 58 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

63 EM-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Emergency Medicine Not or More Contiguous Ranks Not or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 59 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

64 Graph EM-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Emergency Medicine 1. Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 6 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

65 EM-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Emergency Medicine 1,2 1,72 Not 1, or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 1,2 Not 1, or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 61 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

66 EM-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Emergency Medicine 24 2 Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores 24 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Step 1 Scores Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 62 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

67 Graph EM-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Emergency Medicine 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 63 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

68 EM-4 USMLE Step 2 Scores Emergency Medicine Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and 2 Not 96 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 Step 2 Scores 177 Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Step 2 Scores Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 64 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

69 EM-5 Number of Research Projects Emergency Medicine Not None or More Research Projects 35 3 Not None or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 65 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

70 EM-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Emergency Medicine 6 Not None or More Publications Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 66 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

71 EM-7 Number of Work Experiences Emergency Medicine 28 Not None or More Work Experiences 28 Not None or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 67 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

72 EM-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Emergency Medicine 2 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 68 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

73 EM-9 Other Characteristics of Emergency Medicine 1,2 1, 1,27 AOA Membership Not 8 7 Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding No Yes No 73 Yes 19 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree 1,2 1,135 1,2 1, 1, 1, No 9 18 Yes 2 2 No Yes 14 Sources. AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 69 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

74 FM Family Medicine Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 7 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

75 Table FM-1 Summary Statistics Family Medicine Unmatched Unmatched Measure (n=1,4) (n=23) (n=973) (n=1,266) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members 5.5. n/a n/a 1. Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S n/a n/a medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree 1.. n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources. Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 3 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 71 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

76 FM-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Family Medicine 8 Not or More Contiguous Ranks Not or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 72 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

77 Graph FM-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Family Medicine 1. Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 73 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

78 FM-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Family Medicine 1, 964 Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 1, Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 74 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

79 FM-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Family Medicine Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 Step 1 Scores 129 Between 231 and 24 7 Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 75 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

80 Graph FM-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Family Medicine 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 76 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

81 FM-4 USMLE Step 2 Scores Family Medicine Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and 2 Not Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Step 2 Scores Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 77 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

82 FM-5 Number of Research Projects Family Medicine Not None or More Research Projects 627 Not None or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 78 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

83 FM-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Family Medicine 8 Not None or More Publications 788 Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 79 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

84 FM-7 Number of Work Experiences Family Medicine 5 Not None or More Work Experiences 5 Not None or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 8 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

85 FM-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Family Medicine 35 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences 339 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 81 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

86 FM-9 Other Characteristics of Family Medicine 1, 983 AOA Membership Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding 8 Not No 57 Yes 1 No 19 4 Yes Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree 1,2 1, 1,3 1, No 23 1 Yes 18 5 No Yes Sources. AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 82 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

87 GS General Surgery Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 83 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

88 Table GS-1 Summary Statistics General Surgery Unmatched Unmatched Measure (n=767) (n=133) (n=218) (n=512) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members n/a n/a 1. Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S n/a n/a medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources. Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 3 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 84 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

89 GS-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty General Surgery 3 Not or More Contiguous Ranks Not or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 85 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

90 Graph GS-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks General Surgery 1. Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 86 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

91 GS-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked General Surgery 8 74 Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 87 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

92 GS-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores General Surgery Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 Between 221 and 22 and 23 Step 1 Scores Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and 2 23 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 88 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

93 Graph GS-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score General Surgery 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 89 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

94 GS-4 USMLE Step 2 Scores General Surgery Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 9 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

95 GS-5 Number of Research Projects General Surgery Not None or More Research Projects 167 Not None or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 91 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

96 GS-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications General Surgery Not None or More Publications Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 92 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

97 GS-7 Number of Work Experiences General Surgery Not None or More Work Experiences 18 Not None or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 93 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

98 GS-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences General Surgery 16 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences 144 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 94 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

99 GS-9 Other Characteristics of General Surgery AOA Membership Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding 6 5 Not No Yes No 11 Yes 23 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree No Yes No Yes Sources. AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 95 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

100 IM Internal Medicine Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 96 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

101 Table IM-1 Summary Statistics Internal Medicine Unmatched Unmatched Measure (n=2,726) (n=66) (n=2,113) (n=2,792) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members n/a n/a 1. Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S n/a n/a medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources. Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 3 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 97 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

102 IM-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Internal Medicine 1,4 1,2 Not 1, or More Contiguous Ranks 1,4 1,35 Not 1,2 1, or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 98 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

103 Graph IM-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Internal Medicine 1. Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 99 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

104 IM-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Internal Medicine 2,8 2,4 2,625 Not 2, 1,6 1, or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 2,8 Not 2,4 2, 1,6 1, ,662 1, or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 1 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

105 IM-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Internal Medicine 6 5 Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Step 1 Scores Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and 2 25 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 11 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

106 Graph IM-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Internal Medicine 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 12 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

107 IM-4 USMLE Step 2 Scores Internal Medicine 6 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and 24 Not Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 13 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

108 IM-5 Number of Research Projects Internal Medicine 1,6 1,4 1,2 1, Not None or More Research Projects 1,6 1,4 1,366 Not 1,2 1, None or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 14 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

109 IM-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Internal Medicine 1,6 Not 1,4 1,2 1, None or More Publications 1,6 1,58 Not 1,4 1,2 1,92 1, None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 15 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

110 IM-7 Number of Work Experiences Internal Medicine 1, Not None or More Work Experiences 1, Not None or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 16 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

111 IM-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Internal Medicine 1, Not , None or More Volunteer Experiences Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 17 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

112 IM-9 Other Characteristics of Internal Medicine 2,4 2,319 AOA Membership Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding 2, Not 1,8 1,6 1,677 1,6 1,2 1,4 1,2 1, 1, No 47 1 Yes No Yes Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree 2,8 2,4 2,598 2,8 2,4 2,422 2, 2, 1,6 1,6 1,2 1, No Yes No Yes Sources. AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 18 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

113 IP Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 19 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

114 Table IP-1 Summary Statistics Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Unmatched Unmatched Measure (n=238) (n=14) (n=8) (n=61) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members n/a n/a 1. Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S n/a n/a medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources. Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 3 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 11 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

115 IP-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Internal Medicine/Pediatrics 6 5 Not or More Contiguous Ranks Not or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 111 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

116 Graph IP-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Internal Medicine/Pediatrics 1. Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 112 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

117 IP-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 2 Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 113 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

118 IP-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 1 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 Step 1 Scores Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Not Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 1 Between 221 and 23 Step 1 Scores Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 114 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

119 Graph IP-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Internal Medicine/Pediatrics 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 115 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

120 IP-4 USMLE Step 2 Scores Internal Medicine/Pediatrics 5 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 8 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 4 Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and 25 1 Between 251 and 26 2 >26 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores 5 Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 9 Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 Step 2 Scores Between 231 and 24 5 Between 241 and Between 251 and 26 8 >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 116 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

121 IP-5 Number of Research Projects Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Not None or More Research Projects 7 6 Not None or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 117 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

122 IP-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Internal Medicine/Pediatrics 1 98 Not None or More Publications Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 118 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

123 IP-7 Number of Work Experiences Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Not None or More Work Experiences 5 Not None or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 119 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

124 IP-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 12 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

125 IP-9 Other Characteristics of Internal Medicine/Pediatrics AOA Membership Not Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding No 5 1 Yes No Yes Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree No 13 4 Yes 1 4 No Yes 2 Sources. AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 121 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

126 NS Neurological Surgery Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 122 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

127 Table NS-1 Summary Statistics Neurological Surgery Unmatched Unmatched Measure (n=171) (n=44) (n=19) (n=61) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members n/a n/a 1. Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S n/a n/a medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources. Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 3 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 123 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

128 NS-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Neurological Surgery 6 5 Not or More Contiguous Ranks Not or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse 3 Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 124 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

129 Graph NS-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Neurological Surgery 1. Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 125 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

130 NS-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Neurological Surgery Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 126 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

131 NS-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Neurological Surgery 5 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 4 Between 191 and Between 21 and 21 Between 211 Between 221 and 22 and 23 Step 1 Scores 8 Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown 5 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 11 Between 21 and 21 1 Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 4 Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 127 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

132 Graph NS-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Neurological Surgery 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 128 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

133 NS-4 USMLE Step 2 Scores Neurological Surgery 1 8 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 6 Between 21 and Between 211 Between 221 and 22 and 23 Step 2 Scores Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown 1 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Step 2 Scores Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 129 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

134 NS-5 Number of Research Projects Neurological Surgery Not None or More Research Projects 45 4 Not None or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 13 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

135 NS-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Neurological Surgery 1 Not None or More Publications Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 131 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

136 NS-7 Number of Work Experiences Neurological Surgery Not None or More Work Experiences 2 35 Not None or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 132 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

137 NS-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Neurological Surgery Not None or More Volunteer Experiences 26 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 133 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

138 NS-9 Other Characteristics of Neurological Surgery AOA Membership Not Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding No Yes No 3 Yes 14 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree No 4 2 Yes No Yes 8 Sources. AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 134 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

139 N Neurology Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 135 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

140 Table N-1 Summary Statistics Neurology Unmatched Unmatched Measure (n=35) (n=11) (n=226) (n=162) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members n/a n/a 1. Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S n/a n/a medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree 1.2. n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources. Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 3 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 136 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

141 N-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Neurology 1 8 Not or More Contiguous Ranks 1 93 Not or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse 3 Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 137 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

142 Graph N-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Neurology 1. Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 138 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

143 N-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Neurology Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Not or More 13 Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 139 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

144 N-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Neurology 7 6 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 5 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores 7 6 Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 14 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

145 Graph N-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Neurology 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 141 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

146 N-4 USMLE Step 2 Scores Neurology 1 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Not Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 Step 2 Scores 43 Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and 2 17 Between 21 and Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 142 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

147 N-5 Number of Research Projects Neurology Not None or More Research Projects 1 Not None or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 143 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

148 N-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Neurology 1 89 Not None or More Publications Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 144 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

149 N-7 Number of Work Experiences Neurology Not None or More Work Experiences 6 Not None or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 145 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

150 N-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Neurology 6 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 146 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

151 N-9 Other Characteristics of Neurology AOA Membership Not 2 Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding No Yes 4 No 9 Yes 2 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree No 1 32 Yes 1 4 No Yes Sources. AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 147 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

152 OB Obstetrics and Gynecology Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 148 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

153 Table OB-1 Summary Statistics Obstetrics and Gynecology Unmatched Unmatched Measure (n=874) (n=67) (n=283) (n=367) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members n/a n/a 1. Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S n/a n/a medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources. Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 3 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 149 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

154 OB-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Obstetrics and Gynecology 18 Not or More Contiguous Ranks Not or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse 9 11 Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 15 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

155 Graph OB-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Obstetrics and Gynecology 1. Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 151 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

156 OB-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Obstetrics and Gynecology 1, 857 Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 1, Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 152 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

157 OB-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Obstetrics and Gynecology Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and 2 2 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and 24 9 Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 153 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

158 Graph OB-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Obstetrics and Gynecology 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 154 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

159 OB-4 USMLE Step 2 Scores Obstetrics and Gynecology Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 4 Between 221 and 23 8 Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 155 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

160 OB-5 Number of Research Projects Obstetrics and Gynecology Not None or More Research Projects 24 Not None or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 156 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

161 OB-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Obstetrics and Gynecology Not None or More Publications Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 157 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

162 OB-7 Number of Work Experiences Obstetrics and Gynecology 18 Not None or More Work Experiences 18 Not None or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 158 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

163 OB-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Obstetrics and Gynecology Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 159 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

164 OB-9 Other Characteristics of Obstetrics and Gynecology AOA Membership Not 7 6 Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding No Yes No 49 Yes 18 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree 1, No Yes No Yes 9 Sources. AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 16 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

165 ORS Orthopaedic Surgery Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 161 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

166 Table ORS-1 Summary Statistics Orthopaedic Surgery Unmatched Unmatched Measure (n=586) (n=158) (n=53) (n=126) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members n/a n/a 1. Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S n/a n/a medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources. Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 3 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 162 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

167 ORS-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Orthopaedic Surgery 1 Not or More Contiguous Ranks Not or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse 5 6 Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 163 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

168 Graph ORS-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Orthopaedic Surgery 1. Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 164 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

169 ORS-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Orthopaedic Surgery Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 6 Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 165 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

170 ORS-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Orthopaedic Surgery Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 6 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Step 1 Scores Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 166 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

171 Graph ORS-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Orthopaedic Surgery 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 167 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

172 ORS-4 USMLE Step 2 Scores Orthopaedic Surgery Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 Step 2 Scores Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and 25 6 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Step 2 Scores Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 168 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

173 ORS-5 Number of Research Projects Orthopaedic Surgery Not None or More Research Projects Not None or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 169 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

174 ORS-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Orthopaedic Surgery 2 Not None or More Publications Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 17 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

175 ORS-7 Number of Work Experiences Orthopaedic Surgery Not None or More Work Experiences 14 Not None or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 171 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

176 ORS-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Orthopaedic Surgery 1 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 172 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

177 ORS-9 Other Characteristics of Orthopaedic Surgery AOA Membership Not 4 35 Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding No 6 Yes 5 No Yes 38 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree No Yes No Yes 29 Sources. AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 173 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

178 OTO Otolaryngology Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 174 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

179 Table OTO-1 Summary Statistics Otolaryngology Unmatched Unmatched Measure (n=26) (n=66) (n=1) (n=37) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members n/a n/a 1. Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S n/a n/a medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources. Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 3 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 175 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

180 OTO-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Otolaryngology 4 Not or More Contiguous Ranks Not or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 176 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

181 Graph OTO-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Otolaryngology 1. Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 177 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

182 OTO-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Otolaryngology Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 178 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

183 OTO-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Otolaryngology Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 3 Between 21 and Between 211 Between 221 and 22 and 23 Step 1 Scores 14 Between 231 and 24 8 Between 241 and 25 2 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown 8 7 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 Step 1 Scores Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and 26 3 >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 179 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

184 Graph OTO-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Otolaryngology 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 18 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

185 OTO-4 USMLE Step 2 Scores Otolaryngology 12 1 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Step 2 Scores 13 Between 231 and 24 8 Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown 12 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Step 2 Scores Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 181 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

186 OTO-5 Number of Research Projects Otolaryngology Not None or More Research Projects Not None or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 182 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

187 OTO-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Otolaryngology 1 Not None or More Publications Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 183 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

188 OTO-7 Number of Work Experiences Otolaryngology 6 59 Not None or More Work Experiences 6 Not None or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 184 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

189 OTO-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Otolaryngology 7 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 185 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

190 OTO-9 Other Characteristics of Otolaryngology AOA Membership Not Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding No 6 Yes 2 No Yes 14 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree No 7 Yes 1 4 No 29 Yes 8 Sources. AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 186 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

191 PTH Pathology-Anatomic and Clinical Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 187 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

192 Table PTH-1 Summary Statistics Pathology-Anatomic and Clinical Unmatched Unmatched Measure (n=315) (n=21) (n=164) (n=28) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members n/a n/a 1. Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S n/a n/a medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources. Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 3 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 188 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

193 PTH-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Pathology-Anatomic and Clinical 12 1 Not or More Contiguous Ranks Not or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse 5 5 Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 189 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

194 Graph PTH-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Pathology-Anatomic and Clinical 1. Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 19 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

195 PTH-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Pathology-Anatomic and Clinical Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 191 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

196 PTH-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Pathology-Anatomic and Clinical Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and 2 7 Between 21 and 21 4 Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 3 Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores 7 6 Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and 24 9 Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 192 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

197 Graph PTH-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Pathology-Anatomic and Clinical 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 193 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

198 PTH-4 USMLE Step 2 Scores Pathology-Anatomic and Clinical 1 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Not Between 21 and Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Step 2 Scores Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and 26 7 >26 Score Unknown <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and 2 36 Between 21 and Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 194 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

199 PTH-5 Number of Research Projects Pathology-Anatomic and Clinical Not None or More Research Projects 9 Not None or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 195 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

200 PTH-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Pathology-Anatomic and Clinical 1 94 Not None or More Publications Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 196 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

201 PTH-7 Number of Work Experiences Pathology-Anatomic and Clinical Not None or More Work Experiences 7 Not None or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 197 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

202 PTH-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Pathology-Anatomic and Clinical 1 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences 1 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 198 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

203 PTH-9 Other Characteristics of Pathology-Anatomic and Clinical AOA Membership Not 2 Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding No Yes 4 No 15 Yes 6 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree No 2 51 Yes No Yes 2 Sources. AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 199 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

204 PD Pediatrics Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 2 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

205 Table PD-1 Summary Statistics Pediatrics Unmatched Unmatched Measure (n=1,674) (n=33) (n=593) (n=474) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members n/a n/a 1. Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S n/a n/a medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources. Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 3 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 21 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

206 PD-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Pediatrics Not or More Contiguous Ranks Not or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 22 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

207 Graph PD-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Pediatrics 1. Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 23 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

208 PD-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Pediatrics 1,8 1,6 1,639 Not 1,4 1,2 1, or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 1,8 1,6 1,4 1,2 1, 8 Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 24 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

209 PD-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Pediatrics Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and 2 Not Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Step 1 Scores Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 6 Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 25 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

210 Graph PD-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Pediatrics 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 26 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

211 PD-4 USMLE Step 2 Scores Pediatrics Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and Not Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Step 2 Scores Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 27 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

212 PD-5 Number of Research Projects Pediatrics Not None or More Research Projects 45 4 Not None or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 28 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

213 PD-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Pediatrics Not None or More Publications Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 29 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

214 PD-7 Number of Work Experiences Pediatrics Not None or More Work Experiences 35 Not None or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 21 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

215 PD-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Pediatrics 45 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 211 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

216 PD-9 Other Characteristics of Pediatrics 1,6 1,4 1,472 AOA Membership Not 1,2 Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding 1,113 1,2 1, 1, No Yes 24 9 No Yes Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree 1,8 1,6 1,67 1,6 1,4 1,517 1,4 1,2 1,2 1, 8 6 1, No Yes No Yes Sources. AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 212 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

217 PM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 213 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

218 Table PM-1 Summary Statistics Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unmatched Unmatched Measure (n=162) (n=9) (n=179) (n=129) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members 4.3. n/a n/a 1. Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S n/a n/a medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree 1.9. n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources. Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 3 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 214 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

219 PM-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 6 5 Not or More Contiguous Ranks 6 6 Not or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 215 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

220 Graph PM-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1. Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 216 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

221 PM-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 6 Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 217 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

222 PM-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 12 1 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 Between 221 and 22 and 23 Step 1 Scores Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown 12 1 Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and 2 11 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 218 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

223 Graph PM-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 219 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

224 PM-4 USMLE Step 2 Scores Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 12 1 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and 22 3 Between 221 and 23 Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores 12 1 Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 Step 2 Scores Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 22 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

225 PM-5 Number of Research Projects Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 7 Not None or More Research Projects Not None or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 221 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

226 PM-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 12 Not None or More Publications Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 222 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

227 PM-7 Number of Work Experiences Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 4 Not None or More Work Experiences Not None or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 223 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

228 PM-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 32 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 224 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

229 PM-9 Other Characteristics of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation AOA Membership Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding Not No 9 7 Yes 2 No 5 4 Yes Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree No 9 3 Yes No 7 23 Yes 2 Sources. AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 225 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

230 PS Plastic Surgery Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 226 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

231 Table PS-1 Summary Statistics Plastic Surgery Unmatched Unmatched Measure (n=85) (n=77) (n=12) (n=17) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members n/a n/a 1. Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S n/a n/a medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources. Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 3 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 227 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

232 PS-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Plastic Surgery or More Contiguous Ranks 9 Not Not or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 228 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

233 Graph PS-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Plastic Surgery 1. Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 229 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

234 PS-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Plastic Surgery Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 1 6 Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 23 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

235 PS-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Plastic Surgery Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and 2 5 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 8 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 3 Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 and 22 1 Between 221 and Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and Between 251 and 26 1 >26 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 231 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

236 Graph PS-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Plastic Surgery 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 232 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

237 PS-4 USMLE Step 2 Scores Plastic Surgery 5 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 6 Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores 5 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 4 Between 221 and 23 Step 2 Scores 4 Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 233 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

238 PS-5 Number of Research Projects Plastic Surgery Not None or More Research Projects 24 2 Not None or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 234 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

239 PS-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Plastic Surgery 6 Not None or More Publications Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 235 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

240 PS-7 Number of Work Experiences Plastic Surgery 24 Not None or More Work Experiences Not None or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 236 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

241 PS-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Plastic Surgery Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 237 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

242 PS-9 Other Characteristics of Plastic Surgery AOA Membership No Not Yes Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding 41 No 4 44 Yes 37 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree No 2 Yes No 9 Yes 8 Sources. AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 238 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

243 P Psychiatry Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 239 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

244 Table P-1 Summary Statistics Psychiatry Unmatched Unmatched Measure (n=643) (n=38) (n=371) (n=511) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members n/a n/a 1. Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S n/a n/a medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree 4.5. n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources. Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 3 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 24 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

245 P-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Psychiatry Not or More Contiguous Ranks Not or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse 1 12 Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 241 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

246 Graph P-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Psychiatry 1. Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 242 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

247 P-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Psychiatry Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 7 Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 243 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

248 P-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Psychiatry <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Not Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 Between 221 and 22 and 23 Step 1 Scores Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 Step 1 Scores Between 231 and 24 Not Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 244 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

249 Graph P-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Psychiatry 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 245 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

250 P-4 USMLE Step 2 Scores Psychiatry <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Not Between 191 and 2 71 Between 21 and Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Step 2 Scores 72 Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 246 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

251 P-5 Number of Research Projects Psychiatry 24 Not None or More Research Projects 22 Not None or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 247 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

252 P-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Psychiatry Not None or More Publications Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 248 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

253 P-7 Number of Work Experiences Psychiatry Not None or More Work Experiences Not None or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 249 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

254 P-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Psychiatry 12 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences 114 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 25 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

255 P-9 Other Characteristics of Psychiatry AOA Membership Not Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding No 27 1 Yes 1 5 No 35 Yes 3 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree No Yes 1 No 3 76 Yes 8 Sources. AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 251 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

256 RO Radiation Oncology Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 252 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

257 Table RO-1 Summary Statistics Radiation Oncology Unmatched Unmatched Measure (n=134) (n=21) (n=8) (n=16) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members n/a n/a 1. Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S n/a n/a medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree 9.7. n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources. Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 3 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 253 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

258 RO-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Radiation Oncology or More Contiguous Ranks 8 Not or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse 1 Not 1 Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 254 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

259 Graph RO-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Radiation Oncology 1. Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 255 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

260 RO-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Radiation Oncology Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 256 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

261 RO-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Radiation Oncology Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and Between 21 and 21 7 Between 211 and 22 2 Between 221 and 23 Step 1 Scores 5 Between 231 and 24 6 Between 241 and 25 2 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown 4 35 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and 22 2 Between 221 and Between 231 and 24 2 Between 241 and 25 1 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 257 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

262 Graph RO-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Radiation Oncology 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 258 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

263 RO-4 USMLE Step 2 Scores Radiation Oncology 8 7 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Not Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Step 2 Scores Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and 26 1 >26 Score Unknown <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Step 2 Scores Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 259 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

264 RO-5 Number of Research Projects Radiation Oncology 45 4 Not None or More Research Projects Not None or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 26 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

265 RO-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Radiation Oncology 1 Not None or More Publications Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 261 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

266 RO-7 Number of Work Experiences Radiation Oncology Not None or More Work Experiences 28 Not None or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 262 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

267 RO-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Radiation Oncology Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 263 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

268 RO-9 Other Characteristics of Radiation Oncology AOA Membership Not Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding No 2 Yes 2 1 No 13 Yes 8 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree No 17 Yes 4 2 No Yes Sources. AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 264 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

269 TR Transitional Year Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 265 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

270 Table TR-1 Summary Statistics Transitional Year Unmatched Unmatched Measure (n=193) (n=68) (n=15) (n=49) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members n/a n/a 1. Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S n/a n/a medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources. Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 3 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 266 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

271 TR-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Transitional Year 1 84 Not or More Contiguous Ranks 1 Not or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 267 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

272 Graph TR-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Transitional Year 1. Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 268 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

273 TR-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Transitional Year Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 269 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

274 TR-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Transitional Year 45 4 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 5 Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 Between 221 and 22 and 23 Step 1 Scores 16 Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 7 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Not Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Step 1 Scores Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 27 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

275 Graph TR-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Transitional Year 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 271 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

276 TR-4 USMLE Step 2 Scores Transitional Year 12 1 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 1 Between 21 and 21 7 Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores 12 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Step 2 Scores Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and 26 5 >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 272 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

277 TR-5 Number of Research Projects Transitional Year Not None or More Research Projects Not None or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 273 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

278 TR-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Transitional Year 7 Not None or More Publications Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 274 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

279 TR-7 Number of Work Experiences Transitional Year Not None or More Work Experiences Not None or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 275 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

280 TR-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Transitional Year 4 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 276 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

281 TR-9 Other Characteristics of Transitional Year AOA Membership Not Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding No Yes 2 No Yes Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree No 8 Yes No 2 Yes 6 Sources. AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright 29 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be 277 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 29

Charting Outcomes in the Match

Charting Outcomes in the Match ing Outcomes in the Match Characteristics of Applicants Who to Their Preferred Specialty in the 4 Main Residency Match 5th Edition Prepared by: National Resident Matching Program www.nrmp.org August 4

More information

Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors

Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors ing Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors Characteristics of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Who to Their Preferred Specialty in the 216 Main Residency Match 1st Edition Prepared by: National Resident

More information

1st Edition. Prepared by: National Resident Matching Program and Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates. January 2014. www.nrmp.

1st Edition. Prepared by: National Resident Matching Program and Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates. January 2014. www.nrmp. ing Outcomes in the Match International Medical Graduates Characteristics of Applicants Who to Their Preferred Specialty in the 213 Main Residency Match 1st Edition Prepared by: National Resident Matching

More information

Careers in Medicine: The U.S. Approach to Career Planning in Medical School. George V. Richard, Ph.D. Director, Careers in Medicine Program

Careers in Medicine: The U.S. Approach to Career Planning in Medical School. George V. Richard, Ph.D. Director, Careers in Medicine Program Careers in Medicine: The U.S. Approach to Career Planning in Medical School George V. Richard, Ph.D. Director, Careers in Medicine Program January 18, 2007 The Structure of U.S. Medical Education Baccalaureate

More information

2013 R-1 MAIN RESIDENCY MATCH REPORT

2013 R-1 MAIN RESIDENCY MATCH REPORT 2013 R-1 MAIN RESIDENCY MATCH REPORT carms.ca August 2013 Executive Summary The Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS) is a national, not-for-profit, fee-for-service organization that provides medical

More information

Results and Data. 2015 Main Residency Match. April 2015. www.nrmp.org

Results and Data. 2015 Main Residency Match. April 2015. www.nrmp.org Results and Data 2015 Main Residency Match April 2015 www.nrmp.org Requests for permission to use these data as well as questions about the content of this publication or National Resident Matching Program

More information

2012 Physician Specialty Data Book. Center for Workforce Studies. November 2012. Association of American Medical Colleges

2012 Physician Specialty Data Book. Center for Workforce Studies. November 2012. Association of American Medical Colleges Center for Workforce Studies November 2012 Association of American Medical Colleges Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Acknowledgments... 1 Key Findings... 2 Key Definitions... 3 Commonly Used Acronyms...

More information

Results and Data 2014 Main Residency Match

Results and Data 2014 Main Residency Match Results and Data 2014 Main Residency Match April 2014 www.nrmp.org Requests for permission to use these data as well as questions about the content of this publication or the National Resident Matching

More information

Responsibilities of the Program Coordinator. Presentation Goals. What is a Program Coordinator?

Responsibilities of the Program Coordinator. Presentation Goals. What is a Program Coordinator? Responsibilities of the Program Coordinator New Coordinators Pre-Course 2008 ACGME Annual Educational Conference Grapevine, Texas Norma R. de Yagcier Senior Accreditation Administrator Presentation Goals

More information

Characteristics of Clinical Clerkships

Characteristics of Clinical Clerkships N a t i o n a l B o a r d o f M e d i c a l E x a m i n e r s Characteristics of Clinical Clerkships Fall 2014 Table of Contents Summary... 3 Table 1. Unweighted and Weighted Clerkship Responses... 5 Chart

More information

Perceived and Actual Competitiveness of the Canadian Residency Programs by Specialty

Perceived and Actual Competitiveness of the Canadian Residency Programs by Specialty Perceived and Actual Competitiveness of the Canadian Residency Programs by Specialty Author: Alexander Bilbily MD Candidate Supervisor: Dr. Robert Bleakney Date: October 20 th 2012 I do not have an affiliation

More information

Wisconsin Department of Safety and Professional Services

Wisconsin Department of Safety and Professional Services PLAN AHEAD: Wisconsin Department of Safety and Professional Services Mail To: P.O. Box 8935 Madison, WI 53708-8935 1400 E. Washington Avenue Madison, WI 53703 FAX #: (608) 261-7083 Phone #: (608) 266-2112

More information

Medical Council of New Zealand List of approved qualifications for locum tenens specialist appointments (showing amendments)

Medical Council of New Zealand List of approved qualifications for locum tenens specialist appointments (showing amendments) Anaesthesia Fellowship of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists Fellowship of the Faculty of Anaesthetists, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons Fellowship of the Royal College of Physicians

More information

Medical Education Policy: Recruitment and Appointment

Medical Education Policy: Recruitment and Appointment Medical Education Policy: Recruitment and Appointment Facility: CMC Origin Date: Revision Date: March 2014 Sponsor: GMEC 1. PURPOSE: Carilion Clinic Graduate Medical Education programs follow the eligibility

More information

Specialty-specific References for DIOs: Expected Time for Program Director ACGME

Specialty-specific References for DIOs: Expected Time for Program Director ACGME -specific References for DIOs: Expected Time for Program Director ACGME Specialty Allergy and Immunology Anesthesiology (effective: July 1, 2016) Adult Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology Critical Care Anesthesiology

More information

Roadmap to Residency:

Roadmap to Residency: Roadmap to Residency: From Learn Serve Lead Association of American Medical Colleges Roadmap to Residency: From 2006 Association of American Medical Colleges All rights reserved. No part of this publication

More information

4. Clinton Memorial Hospital Family Practice Program ACGME# 1203821626

4. Clinton Memorial Hospital Family Practice Program ACGME# 1203821626 CLOSED RESIDENCY PROGRAMS 1. Cabrini Medical Center Cardiovascular Disease Fellowship Program ACGME# 1413531114 Internal Medicine Program ACGME# 1403531266 Infectious Disease Program ACGME# 146351097 Podiatry

More information

Appendix 1 Current list of approved qualifications for Locum Tenens registration

Appendix 1 Current list of approved qualifications for Locum Tenens registration Appendix 1 Current list of approved qualifications for Locum Tenens registration Anaesthesia Fellowship of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists Fellowship of the Faculty of Anaesthetists,

More information

Frequently Asked Questions: Resident/Fellow Eligibility Common Program Requirements ACGME

Frequently Asked Questions: Resident/Fellow Eligibility Common Program Requirements ACGME Frequently Asked Questions: Resident/Fellow Eligibility Common Program Requirements ACGME Question In what settings are the new eligibility requirements applicable? [Program Requirements: III.A. and III.A.1.]

More information

Results and Data Specialties Matching Service 2014 Appointment Year

Results and Data Specialties Matching Service 2014 Appointment Year Results and Data Specialties Matching Service 214 Appointment Year February 214 www.nrmp.org Requests for permission to use these data as well as questions about the content of this publication or the

More information

KEY TENETS OF NRMP POLICY:

KEY TENETS OF NRMP POLICY: KEY TENETS OF NRMP POLICY: Expectations for Match- Participating Programs ARCS 2009 Meeting Laurie S. Curtin, Ph.D. Director, Match Policy FOCUS OF PRESENTATION Pop Quiz Key Tenets of the Match Participation

More information

Results and Data 2016 Main Residency Match

Results and Data 2016 Main Residency Match Results and Data 2016 Main Residency Match April 2016 www.nrmp.org Requests for permission to use these data as well as questions about the content of this publication or National Resident Matching Program

More information

The Surgical Workforce in the United States: Profile and Recent Trends

The Surgical Workforce in the United States: Profile and Recent Trends The Surgical Workforce in the United States: Profile and Recent Trends April 2010 The Surgical Workforce in the United States: Profile and Recent Trends April 2010 Acknowledgments The Surgical Workforce

More information

TRANSITION TO RESIDENCY

TRANSITION TO RESIDENCY TRANSITION TO RESIDENCY The Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) The Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE), formerly called the dean s letter, is a formal document, completed by medical

More information

Accredited Schools and Programs

Accredited Schools and Programs A.B. Freeman School of Business Bachelor of Science in Management (BSM), Master of Business Administration (MBA), Master of Global Management (MGM), Master of Management, Master of Finance (MFIN), Master

More information

STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES POLICY: ELIGIBILITY, SELECTION AND APPOINTMENT OF RESIDENTS, FELLOWS AND TRANSFERS PURPOSE: To establish an institutional

More information

Match Participation Agreement For Applicants and Programs For the 2015 Main Residency Match

Match Participation Agreement For Applicants and Programs For the 2015 Main Residency Match Match Participation Agreement For Applicants and Programs For the 2015 Main Residency Match Terms and Conditions of the Match Participation Agreement Among Applicants, the NRMP, and Participating Programs

More information

Results and Data Specialties Matching Service 2015 Appointment Year

Results and Data Specialties Matching Service 2015 Appointment Year Results and Data Specialties Matching Service 215 Appointment Year February 215 www.nrmp.org Requests for permission to use these data, as well as questions about the content of this publication or any

More information

The Residency Process

The Residency Process The Residency Process 2014 Table of Contents ADVISING CALENDAR... 2 CONTACT INFORMATION... 3 GLOSSARY OF TERMS... 4 HONORS AND AWARDS... 6 REQUIREMENTS FOR GRADUATION... 8 SCHEDULING FOR FOURTH YEAR...

More information

Specialty-specific References for DIOs: Program Director Qualifications ACGME

Specialty-specific References for DIOs: Program Director Qualifications ACGME -specific References for DIOs: Program Director Qualifications ACGME Common Program Requirements are in BOLD Specialty Allergy and Immunology Anesthesiology II.A.3.b) current certification in the specialty

More information

2012 Georgia Medical School Graduate Survey Report

2012 Georgia Medical School Graduate Survey Report 2012 Georgia Medical School Graduate Survey Report GEORGIA BOARD FOR PHYSICIAN WORKFORCE DECEMBER 2012 2 PEACHTREE STREET, NW, 36 TH FLOOR, ATLANTA, GA 30303 PHONE (404) 232-7972 / FAX (404) 656-2596 Cherri

More information

PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT. Education and Practice Donna DeGracia MPAS, PA-C St. Catherine University MPAS Program

PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT. Education and Practice Donna DeGracia MPAS, PA-C St. Catherine University MPAS Program PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT Education and Practice Donna DeGracia MPAS, PA-C St. Catherine University MPAS Program History of PA Profession Started in the mid 1960s to address shortage of primary care physicians

More information

Selection of Future Medical Practice: Using the Australian Medical Schools Outcomes Database to inform national workforce planning

Selection of Future Medical Practice: Using the Australian Medical Schools Outcomes Database to inform national workforce planning Selection of Future Medical Practice: Using the Australian Medical Schools Outcomes Database to inform national workforce planning Author: David A Kandiah Date: 19 October 2012 I do not have an affiliation

More information

Full name/ Title of Medical Qualifications Eligible for Conditional Registration. American Board of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Full name/ Title of Medical Qualifications Eligible for Conditional Registration. American Board of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Conferred by s in the United States of America: Board Cert (Anaesthesiology) Board Cert (Anatomic Pathology) Board Cert (Cardiology) Board Cert (Cardiovascular Disease) Board Cert (Clinical Pathology)

More information

Introduction There are two approved residency training models for plastic surgery, the Independent Model and the Integrated Model.

Introduction There are two approved residency training models for plastic surgery, the Independent Model and the Integrated Model. TRAINING REQUIREMENTS Introduction There are two approved residency training models for plastic surgery, the Independent Model and the Integrated Model. A plastic surgery program director may choose to

More information

Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health

Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health Report on Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Faculty Salary Analysis, 2003-2004 With Additional Comments November 29, 2005 Objectives:

More information

Department of Medical Education Graduate Medical Education Office (GMEO) HMC Residency. Residents Eligibility, Selection and Matching Process

Department of Medical Education Graduate Medical Education Office (GMEO) HMC Residency. Residents Eligibility, Selection and Matching Process HAMAD MEDICAL CORPORATION Department of Medical Education Graduate Medical Education Office (GMEO) HMC Residency Residents Eligibility, Selection and Matching Process FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (F.A.Qs)

More information

Step 3: Planning a 4 th year curriculum for your career

Step 3: Planning a 4 th year curriculum for your career Step 3: Planning a 4 th year curriculum for your career There are six tasks to accomplish in fourth year: Step 1: Write your CV. Document what you have done thus far. Step 2: Choose a career. Choose wisely:

More information

Aggregate Indemnity and Medical Costs for Calendar Year 2012 (CA-IM-2012) Due Date: April 2, 2013

Aggregate Indemnity and Medical Costs for Calendar Year 2012 (CA-IM-2012) Due Date: April 2, 2013 February 1, 2013 525 Market Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105-2767 Voice 415.778.7008 www.wcirbonline.org [email protected] David M. Bellusci Executive Vice President, COO & Chief Actuary To:

More information

APPLICATION FOR A NEW AOA OSTEOPATHIC RESIDENCY TRAINING PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS

APPLICATION FOR A NEW AOA OSTEOPATHIC RESIDENCY TRAINING PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS APPLICATION FOR A NEW AOA OSTEOPATHIC RESIDENCY TRAINING PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION A INSTRUCTIONS... 2 SECTION B - PROGRAM INFORMATION... 4 SECTION C REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION... 5 SECTION D APPROVAL

More information

Physician Assistants 2012 Survey

Physician Assistants 2012 Survey Vermont Department of Health Physician Assistants 2012 Survey Statistical Report 2012 Physician Assistants Survey Statistical Report State of Vermont Peter Shumlin, Governor Agency of Human Services Douglas

More information

Biostatistics Credit 15 5 10 1. Integrated and Interdisciplinary Training 2/7 Credit 24 24 1

Biostatistics Credit 15 5 10 1. Integrated and Interdisciplinary Training 2/7 Credit 24 24 1 1st Year Hours SEMESTER I Exam or credit Total Lecture Seminar Classes ECTS Anatomy 1/2* Credit 100 20 80 9 Biophysics Exam 55 15 10 30 4 First Aid in Emergency Situations Credit 20 6 4 10 1 Histology

More information

Physician Practice Acquisitions

Physician Practice Acquisitions Trend Watch: Physician Practice Acquisitions Tracking Which Physician Practices Hospitals are Acquiring Introduction Are hospitals actively acquiring physician practices? If so, which specialties? In this

More information

Chapter 02 Licensure Requirements for the Practice of Medical Doctors and Osteopathic Physicians

Chapter 02 Licensure Requirements for the Practice of Medical Doctors and Osteopathic Physicians Chapter 02 Licensure Requirements for the Practice of Medical Doctors and Osteopathic Physicians Licensure by Examination 100 To qualify for admission by examination, an individual shall meet the following

More information

Survey PRACTICE AND COMPENSATION EXPECTATIONS FOR PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS. 800.780.3500 mdainc.com

Survey PRACTICE AND COMPENSATION EXPECTATIONS FOR PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS. 800.780.3500 mdainc.com Survey PRACTICE AND COMPENSATION EXPECTATIONS FOR PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS 800.780.3500 mdainc.com Overview OBJECTIVE The objective of this survey was to collect and quantify practice and compensation expectations

More information

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE DATABASE

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE DATABASE GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE DATABASE Each of the standards in this section is followed by relevant questions. In some cases, two closely related standards are placed together, followed by a

More information

2011 State Physician Workforce Data Book

2011 State Physician Workforce Data Book Center for Workforce Studies November 2011 Association of American Medical Colleges Association of American Medical Colleges 2009 Acknowledgments The 2011 State Physician Workforce Data Book was produced

More information

Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) Selection Criteria Texas Alpha Chapter at the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB)

Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) Selection Criteria Texas Alpha Chapter at the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) Selection Criteria Texas Alpha Chapter at the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) Written May 18, 2003 Last Revised February 25, 2013 Reviewed by: Dr. Lisa Farmer (AOA Faculty

More information

Program Director s Workstation (PDWS) User Guide. www.aamc.org/eras. Electronic Residency Application Service ERAS

Program Director s Workstation (PDWS) User Guide. www.aamc.org/eras. Electronic Residency Application Service ERAS Electronic Residency Application Service 2016 ERAS Program Director s Workstation (PDWS) User Guide ERAS is a program of the Association of American Medical Colleges ERAS is a program of the Association

More information

Teaching Physician Billing Compliance. Effective Date: March 27, 2012. Office of Origin: UCSF Clinical Enterprise Compliance Program. I.

Teaching Physician Billing Compliance. Effective Date: March 27, 2012. Office of Origin: UCSF Clinical Enterprise Compliance Program. I. Teaching Physician Billing Compliance Effective Date: March 27, 2012 Office of Origin: UCSF Clinical Enterprise Compliance Program I. Purpose These Policies and Procedures are intended to clarify the Medicare

More information

REQUEST FOR MEMBERSHIP AND CLINICAL PRIVILEGES

REQUEST FOR MEMBERSHIP AND CLINICAL PRIVILEGES REQUEST FOR MEMBERSHIP AND CLINICAL PRIVILEGES *Applicant Printed Name: *Denotes required fields (Last) (First) (M.I) (Degree) Maiden Name (Alias): (Last) (First) *DOB: *SSN Sex: Male Female *Applicant

More information

REPORT TO THE 2015 LEGISLATURE. Report on Findings from the Hawai i Physician Workforce Assessment Project

REPORT TO THE 2015 LEGISLATURE. Report on Findings from the Hawai i Physician Workforce Assessment Project REPORT TO THE 2015 LEGISLATURE Report on Findings from the Hawai i Physician Workforce Assessment Project Act 18, SSLH 2009 (Section 5), as amended by Act 186, SLH 2012 January 2015 Hawai i Physician Workforce

More information

Residency Selection Criteria: What Medical Students Perceive as Important

Residency Selection Criteria: What Medical Students Perceive as Important Residency Selection Criteria: What Medical Students Perceive as Important Suzanne Brandenburg, MD *, Tracy Kruzick, MD *, C.T. Lin, MD *, Andrew Robinson, MD, Lorraine J. Adams, MSW * * University of Colorado

More information

Everything You Thought You Knew About the Physician Shortage: The Specialty (Neurosurgical) Perspective

Everything You Thought You Knew About the Physician Shortage: The Specialty (Neurosurgical) Perspective Everything You Thought You Knew About the Physician Shortage: The Specialty (Neurosurgical) Perspective Presented by: H. Hunt Batjer, MD Darwin E. Smith Distinguished Chair in Neurological Surgery, The

More information

CLINICAL DEPARTMENTS STATEMENT OF FACULTY ORGANIZATION, STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR RANK (Approved 9/27/94) (Revised 10/13/04, 12/20/05, 12/2007)

CLINICAL DEPARTMENTS STATEMENT OF FACULTY ORGANIZATION, STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR RANK (Approved 9/27/94) (Revised 10/13/04, 12/20/05, 12/2007) CLINICAL DEPARTMENTS STATEMENT OF FACULTY ORGANIZATION, STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR RANK (Approved 9/27/94) (Revised 10/13/04, 12/20/05, 12/2007) INTRODUCTION Each Clinical Department 1 will develop the

More information

GQ Medical School Graduation Questionnaire. All Schools Summary Report FINAL

GQ Medical School Graduation Questionnaire. All Schools Summary Report FINAL 2010 GQ Medical School Graduation Questionnaire All Schools Summary Report FINAL Prepared by Academic Affairs 202-828-0960 email: [email protected] 2010, Association of American Medical Colleges. All rights

More information

McLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES GEORGIA PHYSICIAN SURVEY DECEMBER 11, 2013

McLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES GEORGIA PHYSICIAN SURVEY DECEMBER 11, 2013 McLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES GEORGIA PHYSICIAN SURVEY DECEMBER 11, 2013 1. ARE YOU A CURRENT MEMBER OF THE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF GEORGIA, ALSO KNOWN AS MAG? YES 46.5 NO 48.4 DK/REFUSED 5.1 2. HAVE YOU EVER

More information

Taxonomy Code Mapping Professional Providers

Taxonomy Code Mapping Professional Providers Mapping Professional s Adult Care Nurse Adult Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing 363LA2200X 364SP0809X Adult Health Practice Nursing s Clinical Nurse Specialist Adult Psychiatric/Mental Health Allergy and

More information

TIPS ON RANKING RESIDENCY PROGRAMS

TIPS ON RANKING RESIDENCY PROGRAMS TIPS ON RANKING RESIDENCY PROGRAMS But first, some senior business.......... Senior Requirements Make sure you have enough credits to graduatetaking into account elective maximums - reading electives,

More information

Michigan Department of Community Health Survey of Physician Assistants Frequency Report by School 1

Michigan Department of Community Health Survey of Physician Assistants Frequency Report by School 1 Michigan Department of Community Health Survey of Physician Assistants Frequency Report by School 1 INTRODUCTION Since 2007, the Michigan Department of Community Health (MDCH) has conducted annual surveys

More information

2009 REVIEW OF PHYSICIAN AND CRNA RECRUITING INCENTIVES

2009 REVIEW OF PHYSICIAN AND CRNA RECRUITING INCENTIVES 2009 REVIEW OF PHYSICIAN AND CRNA RECRUITING INCENTIVES 2009 Merritt Hawkins & Associates 5001 Statesman Drive Irving, Texas 75063 (800) 876-0500 MerrittHawkins.com SUMMARY REPORT 2009 REVIEW OF PHYSICIAN

More information

You re Invited About Us Distinctions Education Executive Education. Graduate Training Technology Contact Us

You re Invited About Us Distinctions Education Executive Education. Graduate Training Technology Contact Us You re Invited About Us Distinctions Education Executive Education Graduate Training Technology Contact Us You re Invited Cleveland Clinic Global Physician Associate Program You re Invited Cleveland Clinic

More information

Mississippi Medicaid Enrollment Application (Ordering/Referring/Prescribing Provider)

Mississippi Medicaid Enrollment Application (Ordering/Referring/Prescribing Provider) This application is for the sole purpose of ordering/referring/prescribing items and services for MS Medicaid beneficiaries. This type of enrollment does not allow MS Medicaid to reimburse the applicant/provider

More information

The Pathway to Medical School. Steven T. Case, Ph.D. Associate Dean for Medical School Admissions http://som.umc.edu

The Pathway to Medical School. Steven T. Case, Ph.D. Associate Dean for Medical School Admissions http://som.umc.edu The Pathway to Medical School Steven T. Case, Ph.D. Associate Dean for Medical School Admissions http://som.umc.edu Steps to Become a Physician College/university, 4 years, BA/BS degree Medical school,

More information

CMS SPECIALTY CODES/HEALTHCARE PROVIDER TAXONOMY CROSSWALK. This table reflects Medicare Specialty Codes as of April 1, 2003.

CMS SPECIALTY CODES/HEALTHCARE PROVIDER TAXONOMY CROSSWALK. This table reflects Medicare Specialty Codes as of April 1, 2003. CMS SPECIALTY CODE CMS SPECIALTY CODES/HEALTHCARE PROVIDER TAXONOMY CROSSWALK This table reflects Medicare Specialty Codes as of April 1, 2003. This table reflects Healthcare Provider Taxonomy Codes (HPTC)

More information

Rockbridge Underwriting Agency Limited 3700 Buffalo Speedway, Suite 300 Houston, TX 77098 (713) 874-8800 (713) 874-8899 fax

Rockbridge Underwriting Agency Limited 3700 Buffalo Speedway, Suite 300 Houston, TX 77098 (713) 874-8800 (713) 874-8899 fax Rockbridge Underwriting Agency Limited 3700 Buffalo Speedway, Suite 300 Houston, TX 77098 (713) 874-8800 (713) 874-8899 fax Corporate Locum Tenens Underwriting Questionnaire and Application for Professional

More information

CaRMS Forum 2015 R-1 Main Residency Match Preliminary Analysis. Sandra Banner Executive Director and CEO

CaRMS Forum 2015 R-1 Main Residency Match Preliminary Analysis. Sandra Banner Executive Director and CEO CaRMS Forum 2015 R-1 Main Residency Match Preliminary Analysis Sandra Banner Executive Director and CEO April 26, 2015 CaRMS by the numbers Client services 830 documents translated for bilingual applications

More information

Taxonomy Code Mapping Professional Providers

Taxonomy Code Mapping Professional Providers Professional s Adult Care Nurse Adult Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing 363LA2200X 364SP0809X Adult Health Nursing s Clinical Nurse Specialist Adult Psychiatric/Mental Health Allergy and Immunology 207K00000X

More information

MEDICAL PRACTITIONER PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY APPLICATION FORM

MEDICAL PRACTITIONER PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY APPLICATION FORM MEDICAL PRACTITIONER PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY APPLICATION FORM 1. PERSONAL DETAILS Intended Start Date of Policy: Title: Given Names: Last Name: Gender: M F Date of Birth: Email: Telephone: Mobile: Home

More information

2013 State Physician Workforce Data Book

2013 State Physician Workforce Data Book Center for Workforce Studies November 2013 Association of American Medical Colleges Association of American Medical Colleges 2009 Acknowledgments The 2013 State Physician Workforce Data Book was produced

More information

IAC Ch 9, p.1. AMA means the American Medical Association, a professional organization of physicians and surgeons.

IAC Ch 9, p.1. AMA means the American Medical Association, a professional organization of physicians and surgeons. IAC Ch 9, p.1 653 9.1 (147,148) Definitions. ABMS means the American Board of Medical Specialties, which is an umbrella organization for at least 24 medical specialty boards in the United States that assists

More information

S U R V E Y. Family Medicine Survey for Undergraduate & Postgraduate Elective Opportunities. Dear Faculty Members and Services Groups,

S U R V E Y. Family Medicine Survey for Undergraduate & Postgraduate Elective Opportunities. Dear Faculty Members and Services Groups, Family Medicine Survey for Undergraduate & Postgraduate Elective Opportunities Dear Faculty Members and Services Groups, The Northern Ontario School of Medicine is undertaking a survey to create an online

More information

Develop an Understanding of: ECFMG s Role and Services U.S. Graduate Medical Education International Medical Graduates

Develop an Understanding of: ECFMG s Role and Services U.S. Graduate Medical Education International Medical Graduates An Overview Develop an Understanding of: ECFMG s Role and Services U.S. Graduate Medical Education International Medical Graduates Founded in 1956 Organizational Membership American Board of Medical Specialties

More information

September 2015. Dear Applicant:

September 2015. Dear Applicant: Cardiology Education 670 Bertner Avenue (MC 1-133) Houston, Texas 77030 83/355-6676 Fax 83/355-8374 September 015 Dear Applicant: Thank you for your interest in our program. Please find attached the application

More information

RUSH MEDICAL COLLEGE CLASS of 2016

RUSH MEDICAL COLLEGE CLASS of 2016 RUSH MEDICAL COLLEGE CLASS of 06 POSTGRADUATE APPOINTMENTS NUMBER MATCHED BY SPECIALTY AND INSTITUTION NUMBER MATCHED BY SPECIALTY AND INSTITUTION Anesthesiology Mayo School of Grad Med Educ-MN Rush University

More information

STEPS TO BECOMING A PHYSICIAN

STEPS TO BECOMING A PHYSICIAN STEPS TO BECOMING A PHYSICIAN THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS COLLEGE OF MEDICINE SPECIAL CURRICULAR PROGRAMS HISPANIC CENTER OF EXCELLENCE STEPS TO SUCCESS EDUCATIONAL ALTERNATIVES TOWARDS AN M.D. BEING A

More information

Evolving UM SOM Clinical Practice as the Healthcare Environment Changes

Evolving UM SOM Clinical Practice as the Healthcare Environment Changes Evolving UM SOM Clinical Practice as the Healthcare Environment Changes Introduction to the UM SOM Medical Service Plan This section will cover the following elements: 1. FPI creation, organization, and

More information

Prospective Attribution as a Single-Step Assignment Process

Prospective Attribution as a Single-Step Assignment Process Marilyn Tavenner, Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Attention: CMS 1461 P P.O. Box 8013 Baltimore, MD 21244 8013 Dear Administrator Tavenner:

More information

VISTA STAFFING SOLUTIONS. Guide to Locum Tenens

VISTA STAFFING SOLUTIONS. Guide to Locum Tenens VISTA STAFFING SOLUTIONS Guide to Locum Tenens Guide to Locum Tenens In Latin, locum tenens means one holding a place. In medicine today it means building a solid foundation for a new career, a successful

More information

UIC College of Medicine Compliance Plan/Program

UIC College of Medicine Compliance Plan/Program UIC College of Medicine Compliance Plan/Program Updated for Calendar Year 2010 Policy: Each designated operating unit within the University of Illinois Medical Center at Chicago and its associated clinical

More information

MGMA PROVIDER COMPENSATION 2015

MGMA PROVIDER COMPENSATION 2015 Physicians Allergy/Immunology 203 86 Anesthesiology 2,146 120 Anesthesiology: Pain Management 127 59 Cardiology: Electrophysiology 327 126 Cardiology: Invasive 424 148 Cardiology: Invasive-Interventional

More information

Earning and redeeming CME/CE/CPD credit

Earning and redeeming CME/CE/CPD credit Earning and redeeming CME/CE/CPD credit A step-by-step guide for clinicians accessing UpToDate through an EHR, clinician portal or other secure clinical system GET STARTED EARNING CME/CE/CPD CREDIT REGISTER

More information

Policies and Procedures for Certification and Fellowship January 2016

Policies and Procedures for Certification and Fellowship January 2016 Policies and Procedures for Certification and Fellowship January 2016 These regulations supersede previously published editions. The Royal College reserves the right to change these regulations at any

More information

CAPER. Provincial Report. New Brunswick Supplement 2005-2006. Canadian Post-M.D. Education Registry 774 Echo Drive. Ottawa, ON Canada K1 S 5P2

CAPER. Provincial Report. New Brunswick Supplement 2005-2006. Canadian Post-M.D. Education Registry 774 Echo Drive. Ottawa, ON Canada K1 S 5P2 Provincial Report ; New Brunswick Supplement 005-006 Echo Drive Ottawa, ON Canada K S 5P Telephone: (6) 0-0 Facsimile: (6) 0-96 E-mail: caper( afmc.ca Website: www.caper.ca 'fhj ~--ff= 'Y~ I Table of Contents

More information