Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors
|
|
|
- Giles Lambert
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ing Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors Characteristics of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Who to Their Preferred Specialty in the 216 Main Residency Match 1st Edition Prepared by: National Resident Matching Program September 216
2 Questions about the contents of this publication may be directed to Mei Liang, Director of Research, National Resident Matching Program, (22) or Questions about the NRMP should be directed to Mona M. Signer, President and CEO, National Resident Matching Program, (22) or Copyright 216 National Resident Matching Program, 2121 K Street, NW, Suite 1, Washington, DC 237 USA. All rights reserved. Permission to use, copy and/or distribute any documentation and/or related images from this publication shall be expressly obtained from the NRMP National Resident Matching Program, Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216. National Resident Matching Program, Washington, DC 216.
3 216 Table of Contents Introduction... ii Tables and Charts for All Specialties Chart 1. Active Applicants in the 216 Main Residency Match... 2 Table 1. and Positions in the 216 Main Residency Match... 3 Chart 2. Ratio of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Ranking Specialty First / Available Positions... 4 Chart 3. Match Rates of U.S. Allopathic Seniors... 5 Table 2. Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors... 6 Chart 4. Median Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors... 7 Chart 5. Mean Number of Different Specialties Ranked of U.S. Allopathic Seniors... 8 Chart 6. USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors... 9 Chart 7. USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors... 1 Chart 8. Mean Number of Research Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Chart 9. Mean Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Chart 1. Mean Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Chart 11. Mean Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Chart 12. Percentage of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Who are Members of AOA Chart 13. Percentage of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Graduating from One of the 4 Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding Chart 14. Percentage of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Who Have a Graduate Degree Tables and Charts for Individual Specialties Anesthesiology Child Neurology Dermatology Diagnostic Radiology Emergency Medicine Family Medicine General Surgery Internal Medicine Internal Medicine/Pediatrics... 9 Neurological Surgery Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Orthopaedic Surgery Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Vascular Surgery Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the i Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
4 216 Introduction Background The first edition of Charting Outcomes in the Match was published in August 26 to document how applicant qualifications affect success in the Main Residency Match. The report was published biennially between 27 and 211 and was a collaboration of the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP ) and the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC ). Match outcome data from the NRMP were combined with applicant characteristics from the AAMC s Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS ) and United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE ) scores from the AAMC data warehouse. However, starting with the 214 Main Residency Match, the NRMP added a Professional Profile section to its Match registration process to collect the USMLE scores and other applicant characteristics. NRMP has used those data to independently produce this report since the 214 version of Charting Outcomes in the Match. In prior years, this report examined the Match success of only two applicant groups: senior students from U.S. allopathic medical schools and independent applicants. Independent applicants included all applicant types other than U.S. seniors: previous graduates of U.S. allopathic medical schools, students/graduates of osteopathic medical schools, students/graduates of Fifth Pathway programs, students/graduates of Canadian medical schools, and U.S. citizen and non-u.s. citizen students/graduates of international medical schools. Because independent applicants are a heterogeneous group, a decision was made this year to report data separately for U.S. allopathic medical school seniors, students/graduates of osteopathic medical schools, U.S. citizen students/graduates of international medical schools, and non-u.s. citizen students/graduates of international medical schools. This report examines the characteristics of U.S. allopathic seniors. Data Match success, specialty preference, and ranking information were collected through the Main Residency Match. The 4 U.S. medical schools receiving the highest totals of National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants were obtained from the NIH website. Other applicant characteristics, including USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores, academic degrees, publications, Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society (AOA) membership, and research, work and volunteer experiences, were self-reported through the Professional Profile section of the NRMP s Applicant Registration Form for the Match. To complete the form, applicants were asked to answer the questions as they did in their ERAS Common Application Form (CAF). Completion of the form was optional, and applicants who completed the form could consent or decline to participate in NRMP research. Data collection for the self-reported Professional Profile section was granted exemption by the American Institutes for Research (AIR) Institutional Review Board (IRB). A total of 18,187 U.S. allopathic seniors submitted certified rank order lists in the 216 Main Residency Match. After excluding the 9.4 percent of U.S. allopathic seniors who did not give consent to participate in NRMP research, 16,484 applicants were included in the final dataset. Missing data were found in Step 1 scores (2.% missing), Step 2 CK scores (4.%), number of research experiences (14.6%), number of abstracts, presentations, and publications (14.9%), number of work experiences (17.5%), number of volunteer experiences (17.2%), Ph.D. degree (8.4%), other graduate degree (8.8%), and AOA membership (9.3%). To ensure that USMLE Step scores were not misreported, the NRMP asked medical schools to verify the scores of their U.S. senior students. In 216, 91 percent of the Step 1 scores and 92 percent of the Step 2 CK scores used in this report were verified, corrected, or supplied by U.S. medical schools. Because the self-reported scores are highly accurate (the intracorrelation coefficient (ICC) between the self-reported scores and school-verified scores was.981 for Step 1 scores and.978 for Step 2 CK scores), both verified and unverified scores were used to prepare this report. Methods Specialties that offered 5 or more positions in the 216 Main Residency Match are included in this report. Over the years, new specialties have been added to the report, including Otolaryngology and Neurology in 27, Neurological Surgery in 29, and Child Neurology and Vascular Surgery in 214. Transitional Year programs were excluded beginning with the 211 report because they are not viewed as a specialty choice. Twelve measures are incorporated in this report. Probability analysis using a simple logistic regression model was introduced in 29 to evaluate the relationship between Match success and contiguous ranks and USMLE Step 1 scores. Probability analyses in this report used data on U.S. seniors who participated in the Match in 214, 215, and 216. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the ii Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
5 216 Introduction (continued) It is important to note that for purposes of this report, Match success is defined as a match to the specialty of the applicant s first-ranked program, or "preferred specialty," because that is assumed to be the specialty of choice. Lack of success includes matching to another specialty as well as failure to match at all. No distinction was made based on whether applicants matched to the first, second, third, or last choice program. Summary Some general observations apply to all specialties in this report. U.S. allopathic seniors who are successful in matching to their preferred specialty are more likely to: Rank more programs within their preferred specialty Have higher USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 scores Be members of Alpha Omega Alpha Although other measures seem to be related to Match success for some specialties, the relationships are not consistent enough to draw broad conclusions across specialties. In addition, the data sources used for Charting Outcomes in the Match do not include other important applicant factors such as course evaluations, reference letters, and the Medical School Performance Evaluation (MSPE). Despite the fairly strong relationship between USMLE Step scores and Match success, the distributions of scores show that program directors consider other qualifications. A high score is not a guarantee of success, and a lower score is not a bar to success. Even in the most competitive specialties a few individuals with higher scores are not successful. In the less competitive specialties, U.S. seniors with scores slightly above passing usually match to their preferred specialties. The data also are reassuring because they indicate that at least some programs do not employ an arbitrary cutoff or decline to consider applicants with less than excellent test performance. The data in this report support the following straightforward advice one should give to an applicant: Rank all of the programs you really want, without regard to your estimate of your chances with those programs. Include a mix of both highly competitive and less competitive programs within your preferred specialty. Include all of the programs on your list where the program has expressed an interest in you and where you would accept a position. If you are applying to a competitive specialty and you want to have a residency position in the event you are unsuccessful in matching to a program in your preferred specialty, also rank your most preferred programs in an alternate specialty. Include all of your qualifications in your application, but know that you do not have to be AOA, have the highest USMLE scores, have publications, or have participated in research projects to match successfully. Program directors and applicants will find the tables and charts for the specialty of their particular interest later in this report. For questions, comments or more information, please contact: Mei Liang, Director of Research National Resident Matching Program 2121 K Street, NW, Suite 1 Washington, DC 237 Tel: (22) [email protected] Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the iii Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
6 Tables and Charts for All Specialties Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 1 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
7 1 Active Applicants in the 216 Main Residency Match by Applicant Type Students/Graduates of Osteopathic Medical Schools 2,982 Students/Graduates of Fifth Pathway Programs 7 Students/Graduates of Canadian Medical Schools 15 Seniors of U.S. Allopathic Medical Schools 18,187 U.S. Citizen Students/Graduates of International Medical Schools 5,323 Non-U.S. Citizen Students/Graduates of International Medical Schools 7,46 Previous Graduates of U.S. Allopathic Medical Schools 1,52 Chart 1 shows the number of active applicants (applicants who submitted rank order lists of programs) by applicant type in the 216 Main Residency Match. A total of 35,476 active applicans participated in the 216 Main Residency Match. U.S. allopathic medical school seniors constituted 51.3 percent of the applicants in the 216 Match. The next largest group were non-u.s. citizen students and graduates of international medical schools (21.%). The numbers of Fifth Pathway (n=7) and Canadian graduates (n=15) are small. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 2 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
8 Table 1 and Positions in the 216 Main Residency Match by Preferred Specialty* Total Positions Total Number of Number of All Applicants Number of U.S. Seniors Not Number of U.S. Seniors Per Preferred Specialty Offered All Applicants Per Position Total Position Anesthesiology 1,696 1, , Child Neurology Dermatology Diagnostic Radiology 1,168 1, Emergency Medicine 1,895 2, , Family Medicine 3,238 4, , General Surgery 1,241 1, Internal Medicine 7,352 9, , Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurological Surgery Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology 1,265 1, Orthopaedic Surgery 717 1, Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics 2,768 3, , Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Plastic Surgery Psychiatry 1,386 2, Radiation Oncology Vascular Surgery * Preferred specialty is the specialty of the first-ranked program on an applicant's rank order list, excluding preliminary programs in specialties. Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Table 1 provides a summary of the numbers of positions for selected specialties and the numbers of all applicants and U.S. allopathic seniors who preferred each specialty. For example, a total of 1,771 applicants preferred Anesthesiology (or ranked an Anesthesiology position first), among whom 1,76 were U.S. allopathic seniors (1,48 matched and 28 not matched to Anesthesiology). For each of the 1,696 Anesthesiology positions there were 1.4 applicants who preferred the specialty, including.63 U.S. allopathic seniors. Only those specialties offering 5 or more positions are included. For those specialties offering both PGY-1 and PGY-2 positions (including Physician (R) positions), all position types have been combined. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 3 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
9 2 Ratio of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Ranking Specialty First / Available Positions by Preferred Specialty 2.5 All Other Applicants U.S. Seniors Anesthesiology Child Neurology Dermatology Emergency Medicine Diagnostic Radiology Family Medicine General Surgery Neurological Surgery Internal Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurology Orthopaedic Surgery Obstetrics and Gynecology Plastic Surgery Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Vascular Surgery Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Chart 2 shows the ratios of U.S. allopathic seniors and all applicants who preferred each specialty to available positions in that specialty. All specialties except Dermatology, Neurological Surgery, Orthopaedic Surgery, Plastic Surgery, and Vascular Surgery have enough positions to accommodate all U.S. seniors who preferred that specialty. The ratio was lowest for Pathology, Family Medicine, and Internal Medicine. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 4 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
10 3 Match Rates of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Percent by Preferred Specialty Anesthesiology Child Neurology Dermatology Diagnostic Radiology Emergency Medicine Family Medicine General Surgery Internal Medicine Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurological Surgery Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Orthopaedic Surgery Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Vascular Surgery Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Chart 3 shows the percentages of U.S. seniors who matched to their preferred specialty. Overall, 91.9 percent of U.S. seniors matched to their preferred specialty, ranging from a high of 98. percent (Diagnostic Radiology) to a low of 71. percent (Vascular Surgery). Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 5 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
11 Table 2 Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors All Specialties Combined Unmatched Measure (n=14,518) (n=1,766) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 CK score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding Percentage who have Ph.D. degree Percentage who have another graduate degree Sources. NRMP Data Warehouse; Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding in measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Table 2 provides summary statistics for all specialties by Match outcome on the 12 measures presented in this report. Data on each of these measures are displayed graphically by preferred specialty on the following pages. Only U.S. allopathic seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included in this table and the rest of the report. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 6 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
12 4 Median Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors by Preferred Specialty and Match Status Not Anesthesiology Child Neurology Dermatology Emergency Medicine Diagnostic Radiology Family Medicine General Surgery Neurological Surgery Internal Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurology Orthopaedic Surgery Obstetrics and Gynecology Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Vascular Surgery Source: NRMP Data Warehouse In general, applicants are more likely to be successful if they rank more programs in their desired specialty. To quantify this aspect of applicant behavior, we tallied the number of programs ranked in the first-choice specialty before a program in another specialty appeared on the applicant's rank order list (contiguous ranks). Chart 4 displays the median number of contiguous ranks by preferred specialty for U.S. allopathic seniors who matched and did not match to their preferred specialty. The chart shows considerable variation across the specialties for U.S. seniors. Neurological Surgery had the longest average contiguous rank list (16) for matched U.S. seniors and Dermatology had the shortest (8). For all specialties, U.S. seniors who matched to their preferred specialty had median contiguous rank lists that were longer than those of U.S. seniors who did not match. The principal message of these graphs is that applicants with longer rank order lists are more successful than those with shorter ones. The NRMP has been recommending longer lists for many years, but some applicants apparently do not heed the advice. Others may have shorter lists because they found only a few programs willing to entertain their applications or because they could not afford a large number of interview trips. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 7 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
13 5 Mean Number of Different Specialties Ranked by U.S. Allopathic Seniors by Preferred Specialty and Match Status 3. Not Anesthesiology Child Neurology Dermatology Diagnostic Radiology Emergency Medicine Family Medicine General Surgery Internal Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurological Surgery Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Orthopaedic Surgery Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Vascular Surgery Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Some applicants are interested in a single specialty while others consider two or more. Chart 5 displays the average number of different specialties ranked by preferred specialty and Match outcome. For all specialties, U.S. allopathic seniors who did not match to their preferred specialty had a higher mean number of different specialties ranked. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 8 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
14 6 USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors by Preferred Specialty and Match Status Not 18 Anesthesiology Child Neurology Dermatology Emergency Medicine Diagnostic Radiology Family Medicine General Surgery Neurological Surgery Internal Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurology Orthopaedic Surgery Obstetrics and Gynecology Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Vascular Surgery Source: NRMP Data Warehouse USMLE Step 1 scores are a measure of a student s understanding of important basic science concepts and the ability to apply that knowledge to the practice of medicine. Although such knowledge is only one facet of applicant qualifications considered by program directors in their selection process, a Step 1 score is the only qualification that is universally available for all applicants during the interview season and prior to the NRMP s ranking deadline. Overall, U.S. allopathic seniors who matched to their preferred specialty have mean USMLE Step 1 scores of (s.d. = 17.4), well above the 216 minimum passing score of 192. Step 1 scores were available for 98 percent of U.S. seniors who gave consent to research. Chart 6 displays the Step 1 scores for U.S. allopathic seniors by specialty and Match status. The horizontal bars are the median values for successful applicants and the vertical lines show the interquartile ranges (IQR, the range of scores for applicants excluding the top and bottom quarters of the distribution). Scores generally are higher for the more competitive specialties, but there is substantial overlap when specialties are compared. Across all specialties, the IQR of U.S. seniors who matched to their preferred specialties was higher than those who did not match. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 9 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
15 7 27 USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors by Preferred Specialty and Match Status Not Anesthesiology Child Neurology Dermatology Emergency Medicine Diagnostic Radiology Family Medicine General Surgery Neurological Surgery Internal Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurology Orthopaedic Surgery Obstetrics and Gynecology Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Vascular Surgery Source: NRMP Data Warehouse USMLE Step 2 CK scores are a measure of an applicant's ability to apply the medical knowledge, skills, and understanding of clinical science essential for providing patient care. Overall, U.S. allopathic seniors who matched to their preferred specialty had mean USMLE Step 2 CK scores of (s.d. = 14.9), well above the 216 minimum passing score of 29. Step 2 CK scores were available for 96 percent of U.S. seniors who gave consent to research. Chart 7 shows the Step 2 CK scores for U.S. seniors by preferred specialty and Match status. The horizontal bars are the median values for successful applicants and the vertical lines show the interquartile ranges. As was the case for the Step 1 scores, the more competitive specialties have higher average Step 2 CK scores, but the overall variation is smaller. Across all specialties, the IQR of U.S. seniors who matched to their preferred specialties was higher than those who did not match. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 1 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
16 8 Mean Number of Research Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors by Preferred Specialty and Match Status 7. Not Anesthesiology Child Neurology Dermatology Emergency Medicine Diagnostic Radiology Family Medicine General Surgery Neurological Surgery Internal Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurology Orthopaedic Surgery Obstetrics and Gynecology Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Vascular Surgery Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Applicants were asked to report the number of research experiences entered in their Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) applications. The experiences are not verified or evaluated and quality may vary greatly. Chart 8 shows the average number of research experiences by preferred specialty and Match outcome. U.S. seniors averaged 3. research experiences, with 79.6 percent reporting this information. For all specialties except Diagnostic Radiology, Internal Medicine, and Internal Medicine/Pediatrics, matched U.S. seniors had more research experiences on average. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 11 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
17 9 Mean Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors by Preferred Specialty and Match Status 24. Not Anesthesiology Child Neurology Dermatology Emergency Medicine Diagnostic Radiology Family Medicine General Surgery Neurological Surgery Internal Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurology Orthopaedic Surgery Obstetrics and Gynecology Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Vascular Surgery Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Applicants were asked to list the number of abstracts, presentations, and publications they reported in their ERAS applications. This information is self-reported and may include peer-reviewed articles, abstracts, poster sessions, and invited national or regional presentations. Some residency programs may independently verify and even review publications for applicants in whom they have an interest, but most probably do not. Many applicants report abstracts, presentations, or publications, sometimes dozens or even hundreds. In the individual specialty sections, we distinguish between no publications, 1 to 5 publications, and more than 5 publications. Chart 9 shows the average number of publications by preferred specialty and Match outcome. U.S. seniors averaged 4.8 publications, with 7.9 percent reporting this information. U.S. seniors had a higher mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications in all specialties but Internal Medicine, Internal Medicine/Pediatrics, Pathology, and Pediatrics. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 12 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
18 1 Mean Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors by Preferred Specialty and Match Status 5. Not Anesthesiology Child Neurology Dermatology Emergency Medicine Diagnostic Radiology Family Medicine General Surgery Neurological Surgery Internal Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurology Orthopaedic Surgery Obstetrics and Gynecology Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Vascular Surgery Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Applicants were asked to list the number of work experiences they reported in their ERAS application. Chart 1 shows the average number of work experiences by preferred specialty and Match outcome. There is little variation across specialties or within specialties (matched or not matched) for the U.S. seniors. Three-quarters (75.8%) of U.S. seniors reported work experiences, with an average of 3.2 work experiences for all U.S. seniors. Differences in mean number of work experiences are small in most specialties. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 13 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
19 11 Mean Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors by Preferred Specialty and Match Status 12. Not Anesthesiology Child Neurology Dermatology Emergency Medicine Diagnostic Radiology Family Medicine General Surgery Neurological Surgery Internal Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurology Orthopaedic Surgery Obstetrics and Gynecology Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Vascular Surgery Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Applicants were asked to list the number of volunteer experiences they reported in their ERAS applications. Chart 11 displays the average number of volunteer experiences by preferred specialty and Match outcome. U.S. seniors in most specialties averaged more volunteer experiences when compared to unmatched seniors in the same specialties, with several averaging at least one more experience. U.S. seniors averaged 6.8 volunteer experiences, with 82 percent reporting at least one experience. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 14 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
20 12 Percentage of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Who Are Members of AOA by Preferred Specialty and Match Status 1 Not Anesthesiology Child Neurology Dermatology Emergency Medicine Diagnostic Radiology Family Medicine General Surgery 22 5 Neurological Surgery Internal Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Orthopaedic Surgery Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Plastic Surgery 6 Psychiatry 28 Vascular Surgery Radiation Oncology Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Membership in Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) Honor Medical Society is an honor reserved for students with high academic achievement. AOA membership is limited to students in medical schools that sponsor an AOA chapter. Most, but not all, allopathic schools in the United States participate. An analysis of its relationship with success in the Match is limited by the relatively small number of applicants who are members, by the fact that some schools do not have AOA chapters, and by the fact that other schools elect AOA members too late in the academic year for it to be considered in the application process. Data on AOA membership are self-reported. Overall, 16.9 percent of U.S. seniors included in this report claimed AOA membership. Among applicants who matched to their preferred specialty, 17.5 percent reported AOA membership, compared to 12.6 percent of unmatched applicants. As with several of the other measures, the most competitive specialties are able to attract the greatest proportion of AOA members. All specialties attract some AOA applicants, but for most specialties AOA members account for fewer than one in four successful applicants Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 15 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
21 13 Percentage of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Graduating from One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding* by Preferred Specialty and Match Status 5 Not Anesthesiology Child Neurology Dermatology Diagnostic Radiology Emergency Medicine Family Medicine General Surgery Internal Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurological Surgery Neurology Orthopaedic Surgery Obstetrics and Gynecology Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Vascular Surgery *NIH funding information was obtained from NIH website: Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Some program directors may give preference to applicants with research experience or who graduated from a research-intensive medical school. To test that assumption, we obtained data on the amount of NIH grant awards and identified the 4 schools with the highest NIH funding. This measure, by definition, is limited to students of U.S. medical schools. Overall, 32.6 percent of matched and 26.7 percent of unmatched U.S. seniors were graduates of one of the 4 medical schools with the highest NIH funding. Chart 13 shows the percentage of U.S. allopathic seniors who graduated from those schools by specialty and Match outcome. For example, 27 percent of U.S. seniors who matched in Anesthesiology were graduates of one of the 4 medical schools with the highest NIH funding, and 23 percent of seniors who did not match in Anesthesiology were graduates of those schools. Neurological Surgery had the highest percentage of matched U.S. seniors who were graduates of a medical school with the highest NIH funding. Radiation Oncology, Child Neurology, Dermatology, and Otolaryngology also had higher percentages of matched applicants from those schools compared to the other specialties. For all specialties except Internal Medicine/ Pediatrics, and Vascular Surgery, smaller percentages of seniors who did not match to their preferred specialty were graduates of a medical school with the highest NIH funding compared to seniors who matched. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 16 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
22 14 Percentage of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Who Have a Graduate Degree by Preferred Specialty and Match Status Ph.D Anesthesiology Anesthesiology 16 4 Child Neurology Child Neurology Dermatology Emergency Medicine Diagnostic Radiology Other Graduate Degrees Dermatology Emergency Medicine Diagnostic Radiology Family Medicine Family Medicine Not General Surgery Neurological Surgery Internal Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Not General Surgery Internal Medicine Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Neurological Surgery Neurology Orthopaedic Surgery Obstetrics and Gynecology Orthopaedic Surgery Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology 222 Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Otolaryngology Pathology Pediatrics Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Plastic Surgery Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology Psychiatry 2 7 Vascular Surgery Vascular Surgery Radiation Oncology 2419 Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Chart 14 shows by preferred specialty and Match status the percentage of U.S. allopathic seniors who have a Ph.D. and/or other graduate degrees. Radiation Oncology, Pathology, and Child Neurology had the highest percentages of matched U.S. seniors with a Ph.D. degree. For most specialties, the percentage of unmatched U.S. seniors who have other graduate degrees was higher than that of their matched counterparts. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 17 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
23 AN Anesthesiology Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 18 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
24 Table AN-1 Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors Anesthesiology Unmatched Measure (n=965) (n=22) Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding Percentage who have Ph.D. degree Percentage who have another graduate degree Note: Only U.S. allopathic seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included. Sources. NRMP Data Warehouse; Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding in measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 19 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
25 AN-1 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. Allopathic Seniors Anesthesiology Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Chart AN-2 Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Anesthesiology Not or More Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Contiguous Ranks 436 Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 2 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
26 Graph AN-1 1. Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Anesthesiology Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 21 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
27 AN-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Anesthesiology Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 2 Between 191 and 2 56 Between 21 and Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown Chart AN-4 Step 1 Scores USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Anesthesiology Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 22 Step 2 CK Scores Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
28 Graph AN-2 Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Anesthesiology 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 23 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
29 AN-5 Number of Research Projects of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Anesthesiology Not None or More Research Projects Chart AN-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Anesthesiology 35 Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 24 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
30 AN-7 Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Anesthesiology 35 3 Not None or More Work Experiences Chart AN-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Anesthesiology 32 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
31 AN-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Anesthesiology Not Yes AOA Membership 791 No Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding 258 Yes No Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree 1, Yes No 1, Yes No Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding from NIH: Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 26 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
32 CN Child Neurology Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 27 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
33 Table CN-1 Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors Child Neurology Unmatched Measure (n=89) (n=6) Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding Percentage who have Ph.D. degree Percentage who have another graduate degree Note: Only U.S. allopathic seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included. Sources. NRMP Data Warehouse; Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding in measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 28 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
34 CN-1 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. Allopathic Seniors Child Neurology 7 67 Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Chart CN-2 Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Child Neurology or More Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Contiguous Ranks 7 Not Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 29 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
35 Graph CN-1 1. Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Child Neurology Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 3 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
36 CN-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Child Neurology Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Chart CN-4 Step 1 Scores USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Child Neurology 2 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 7 Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 3 Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 31 Step 2 CK Scores Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
37 Graph CN-2 Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Child Neurology 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 32 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
38 CN-5 Number of Research Projects of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Child Neurology Not None or More Research Projects Chart CN-6 5 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Child Neurology Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 33 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
39 CN-7 Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Child Neurology 35 3 Not None or More Work Experiences Chart CN-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Child Neurology 35 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 34 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
40 CN-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Child Neurology Not Yes AOA Membership 71 5 No Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding 41 Yes 2 48 No 4 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree Yes No Yes Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding from NIH: No 4 Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 35 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
41 DM Dermatology Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 36 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
42 Table DM-1 Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors Dermatology Unmatched Measure (n=339) (n=93) Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding Percentage who have Ph.D. degree Percentage who have another graduate degree Note: Only U.S. allopathic seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included. Sources. NRMP Data Warehouse; Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding in measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 37 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
43 DM-1 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. Allopathic Seniors Dermatology Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Chart DM-2 Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Dermatology Not or More Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Contiguous Ranks 32 Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 38 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
44 Graph DM-1 1. Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Dermatology Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 39 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
45 DM-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Dermatology Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 2 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Chart DM-4 Step 1 Scores USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Dermatology Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 4 Step 2 CK Scores Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
46 Graph DM-2 Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Dermatology 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 41 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
47 DM-5 Number of Research Projects of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Dermatology Not None or More Research Projects Chart DM-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Dermatology 32 Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 42 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
48 DM-7 Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Dermatology 14 Not None or More Work Experiences Chart DM-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Dermatology Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
49 DM-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Dermatology Not AOA Membership 2 Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding Yes No Yes 16 No 77 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree Yes No Yes Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding from NIH: No 8 Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 44 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
50 DR Diagnostic Radiology Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 45 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
51 Table DR-1 Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors Diagnostic Radiology Unmatched Measure (n=652) (n=9) Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding Percentage who have Ph.D. degree Percentage who have another graduate degree Note: Only U.S. allopathic seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included. Sources. NRMP Data Warehouse; Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding in measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 46 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
52 DR-1 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. Allopathic Seniors Diagnostic Radiology Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Chart DR-2 Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Diagnostic Radiology Not or More Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Contiguous Ranks 177 Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 47 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
53 Graph DR-1 1. Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Diagnostic Radiology Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 48 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
54 DR-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Diagnostic Radiology Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown Chart DR-4 Step 1 Scores USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Diagnostic Radiology Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 49 Step 2 CK Scores Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
55 Graph DR-2 Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Diagnostic Radiology 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 5 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
56 DR-5 Number of Research Projects of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Diagnostic Radiology Not None or More Research Projects Chart DR-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Diagnostic Radiology 32 Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 51 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
57 DR-7 Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Diagnostic Radiology 2 Not None or More Work Experiences Chart DR-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Diagnostic Radiology 18 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 52 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
58 DR-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Diagnostic Radiology Not AOA Membership Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding Yes No 5 Yes 2 7 No Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree Yes No Yes No Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding from NIH: Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 53 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
59 EM Emergency Medicine Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 54 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
60 Table EM-1 Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors Emergency Medicine Unmatched Measure (n=1,372) (n=124) Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding Percentage who have Ph.D. degree Percentage who have another graduate degree Note: Only U.S. allopathic seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included. Sources. NRMP Data Warehouse; Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding in measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 55 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
61 EM-1 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. Allopathic Seniors Emergency Medicine 1,4 1,269 Not 1,2 1, or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Chart EM-2 Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Emergency Medicine Not or More Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Contiguous Ranks 251 Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 56 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
62 Graph EM-1 1. Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Emergency Medicine Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 57 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
63 EM-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Emergency Medicine Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Chart EM-4 Step 1 Scores USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Emergency Medicine Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 58 Step 2 CK Scores Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
64 Graph EM-2 Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Emergency Medicine 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 59 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
65 EM-5 Number of Research Projects of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Emergency Medicine Not None or More Research Projects Chart EM-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Emergency Medicine 45 Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 6 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
66 EM-7 Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Emergency Medicine 6 5 Not None or More Work Experiences Chart EM-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Emergency Medicine Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
67 EM-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Emergency Medicine Not 1,2 AOA Membership 1,12 1, Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding 95 1, Yes 1 No Yes 28 No 96 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree 1,4 1,353 1,2 1,141 1,2 1, Yes No 1, Yes Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding from NIH: No 94 Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 62 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
68 FM Family Medicine Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 63 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
69 Table FM-1 Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors Family Medicine Unmatched Measure (n=1,254) (n=59) Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding Percentage who have Ph.D. degree Percentage who have another graduate degree Note: Only U.S. allopathic seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included. Sources. NRMP Data Warehouse; Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding in measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 64 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
70 FM-1 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. Allopathic Seniors Family Medicine 1,2 1,152 Not 1, or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Chart FM-2 Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Family Medicine Not or More Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Contiguous Ranks Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 65 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
71 Graph FM-1 1. Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Family Medicine Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 66 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
72 FM-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Family Medicine Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown Chart FM-4 Step 1 Scores USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Family Medicine Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 67 Step 2 CK Scores Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
73 Graph FM-2 Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Family Medicine 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 68 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
74 FM-5 Number of Research Projects of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Family Medicine Not None or More Research Projects Chart FM-6 4 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Family Medicine Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 69 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
75 FM-7 Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Family Medicine 6 Not None or More Work Experiences Chart FM-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Family Medicine 5 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 7 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
76 FM-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Family Medicine Not 1,2 1, AOA Membership 77 Yes 1,68 No 51 1, Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding 38 Yes No 48 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree 1,4 1,242 1,2 1, Yes No 1,2 1, Yes Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding from NIH: 1,37 No 46 Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 71 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
77 GS General Surgery Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 72 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
78 Table GS-1 Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors General Surgery Unmatched Measure (n=816) (n=149) Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding Percentage who have Ph.D. degree Percentage who have another graduate degree Note: Only U.S. allopathic seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included. Sources. NRMP Data Warehouse; Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding in measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 73 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
79 GS-1 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. Allopathic Seniors General Surgery Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Chart GS-2 Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors General Surgery Not or More Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Contiguous Ranks Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 74 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
80 Graph GS-1 1. Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks General Surgery Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 75 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
81 GS-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors General Surgery Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Chart GS-4 USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors General Surgery Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 7 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Step 2 CK Scores Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 76 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
82 Graph GS-2 Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score General Surgery 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 77 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
83 GS-5 Number of Research Projects of U.S. Allopathic Seniors General Surgery 24 Not None or More Research Projects Chart GS-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors General Surgery 4 Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 78 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
84 GS-7 Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors General Surgery 32 Not None or More Work Experiences Chart GS-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors General Surgery 28 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 79 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
85 GS-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors General Surgery Not Yes AOA Membership 69 No Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding 241 Yes No 121 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree Yes No Yes Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding from NIH: No 124 Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 8 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
86 IM Internal Medicine Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 81 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
87 Table IM-1 Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors Internal Medicine Unmatched Measure (n=3,51) (n=62) Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding Percentage who have Ph.D. degree Percentage who have another graduate degree Note: Only U.S. allopathic seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included. Sources. NRMP Data Warehouse; Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding in measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 82 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
88 IM-1 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. Allopathic Seniors Internal Medicine 3,2 2,8 2,912 Not 2,4 2, 1,6 1, or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Chart IM-2 Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Internal Medicine Not or More Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Contiguous Ranks Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 83 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
89 Graph IM-1 1. Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Internal Medicine Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 84 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
90 IM-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Internal Medicine Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and 24 Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Chart IM-4 USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Internal Medicine Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Step 2 CK Scores Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 85 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
91 Graph IM-2 Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Internal Medicine 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 86 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
92 IM-5 Number of Research Projects of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Internal Medicine Not 1, None or More Research Projects Chart IM-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Internal Medicine 1,4 Not 1,381 1,2 1, None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 87 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
93 IM-7 Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Internal Medicine 1,2 1, Not 1, None or More Work Experiences Chart IM-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Internal Medicine 1,2 1, 8 6 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 88 1,21 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
94 IM-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Internal Medicine Not 2,4 AOA Membership 2,175 2,4 Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding 2, 1,6 1, Yes No 2, 1,6 1, ,2 1, Yes No Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree 3,2 2,913 2,8 2,4 2, 1,6 1, Yes No 2,8 2,563 2,4 2, 1,6 1, Yes No Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding from NIH: Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 89 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
95 IP Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 9 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
96 Table IP-1 Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Unmatched Measure (n=314) (n=38) Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding Percentage who have Ph.D. degree Percentage who have another graduate degree Note: Only U.S. allopathic seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included. Sources. NRMP Data Warehouse; Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding in measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 91 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
97 IP-1 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. Allopathic Seniors Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Chart IP-2 Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Not or More Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Contiguous Ranks Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 92 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
98 Graph IP-1 1. Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 93 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
99 IP-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Internal Medicine/Pediatrics 8 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 3 Between 191 and 2 15 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 3 Between 231 and 24 8 Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Chart IP-4 Step 1 Scores USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 94 Step 2 CK Scores Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
100 Graph IP-2 Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Internal Medicine/Pediatrics 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 95 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
101 IP-5 Number of Research Projects of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Not None or More Research Projects Chart IP-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Internal Medicine/Pediatrics 12 Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 96 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
102 IP-7 Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Internal Medicine/Pediatrics 1 Not None or More Work Experiences Chart IP-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 97 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
103 IP-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Not Yes AOA Membership 228 No Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding 96 Yes No 23 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree Yes No Yes Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding from NIH: No 32 Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 98 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
104 NS Neurological Surgery Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 99 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
105 Table NS-1 Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors Neurological Surgery Unmatched Measure (n=183) (n=61) Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding Percentage who have Ph.D. degree Percentage who have another graduate degree Note: Only U.S. allopathic seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included. Sources. NRMP Data Warehouse; Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding in measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 1 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
106 NS-1 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. Allopathic Seniors Neurological Surgery Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Chart NS-2 Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Neurological Surgery Not or More Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Contiguous Ranks Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 11 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
107 Graph NS-1 1. Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Neurological Surgery Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 12 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
108 NS-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Neurological Surgery Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Chart NS-4 Step 1 Scores USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Neurological Surgery Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 5 Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 4 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 13 Step 2 CK Scores Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
109 Graph NS-2 Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Neurological Surgery 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 14 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
110 NS-5 Number of Research Projects of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Neurological Surgery 1 Not None or More Research Projects Chart NS-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Neurological Surgery 16 Not Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the None or More Publications 15 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
111 NS-7 Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Neurological Surgery 6 Not None or More Work Experiences Chart NS-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Neurological Surgery 6 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 16 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
112 NS-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Neurological Surgery Not 12 1 AOA Membership Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding Yes No 1 Yes No Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree Yes No Yes Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding from NIH: No 48 Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 17 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
113 N Neurology Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 18 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
114 Table N-1 Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors Neurology Unmatched Measure (n=391) (n=12) Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding Percentage who have Ph.D. degree Percentage who have another graduate degree Note: Only U.S. allopathic seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included. Sources. NRMP Data Warehouse; Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding in measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 19 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
115 N-1 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. Allopathic Seniors Neurology Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Chart N-2 Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Neurology Not or More Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Contiguous Ranks Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 11 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
116 Graph N-1 1. Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Neurology Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 111 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
117 N-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Neurology Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 6 Between 191 and Between 21 and 21 6 Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown Chart N-4 Step 1 Scores USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Neurology Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 112 Step 2 CK Scores Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
118 Graph N-2 Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Neurology 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 113 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
119 N-5 Number of Research Projects of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Neurology Not None or More Research Projects Chart N-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Neurology 18 Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 114 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
120 N-7 Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Neurology 14 Not None or More Work Experiences Chart N-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Neurology Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 115 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
121 N-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Neurology Not Yes AOA Membership 34 No Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding 133 Yes 258 No 12 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree Yes No Yes Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding from NIH: No 12 Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 116 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
122 OB Obstetrics and Gynecology Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 117 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
123 Table OB-1 Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors Obstetrics and Gynecology Unmatched Measure (n=921) (n=84) Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding Percentage who have Ph.D. degree Percentage who have another graduate degree Note: Only U.S. allopathic seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included. Sources. NRMP Data Warehouse; Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding in measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 118 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
124 OB-1 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. Allopathic Seniors Obstetrics and Gynecology 1, 888 Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Chart OB-2 Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Obstetrics and Gynecology Not or More Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Contiguous Ranks Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 119 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
125 Graph OB-1 1. Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Obstetrics and Gynecology Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 12 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
126 OB-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Obstetrics and Gynecology Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown Chart OB-4 Step 1 Scores USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Obstetrics and Gynecology Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 121 Step 2 CK Scores Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
127 Graph OB-2 Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Obstetrics and Gynecology 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 122 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
128 OB-5 Number of Research Projects of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Obstetrics and Gynecology Not None or More Research Projects Chart OB-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Obstetrics and Gynecology 4 Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 123 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
129 OB-7 Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Obstetrics and Gynecology 35 Not None or More Work Experiences Chart OB-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Obstetrics and Gynecology 4 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 124 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
130 OB-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Obstetrics and Gynecology Not Yes AOA Membership 79 No Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding 287 Yes No 59 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree 1, Yes No Yes Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding from NIH: No 68 Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 125 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
131 ORS Orthopaedic Surgery Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 126 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
132 Table ORS-1 Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors Orthopaedic Surgery Unmatched Measure (n=622) (n=188) Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding Percentage who have Ph.D. degree Percentage who have another graduate degree Note: Only U.S. allopathic seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included. Sources. NRMP Data Warehouse; Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding in measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 127 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
133 ORS-1 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. Allopathic Seniors Orthopaedic Surgery Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Chart ORS-2 Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Orthopaedic Surgery Not or More Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Contiguous Ranks 147 Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 128 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
134 Graph ORS-1 1. Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Orthopaedic Surgery Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 129 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
135 ORS-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Orthopaedic Surgery 2 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Chart ORS-4 Step 1 Scores USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Orthopaedic Surgery Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 13 Step 2 CK Scores Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
136 Graph ORS-2 Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Orthopaedic Surgery 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 131 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
137 ORS-5 Number of Research Projects of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Orthopaedic Surgery 24 Not None or More Research Projects Chart ORS-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Orthopaedic Surgery 4 Not Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the None or More Publications Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors,
138 ORS-7 Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Orthopaedic Surgery 24 Not None or More Work Experiences Chart ORS-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Orthopaedic Surgery Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
139 ORS-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Orthopaedic Surgery Not AOA Membership Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding Yes No Yes No Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree Yes No Yes Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding from NIH: No 156 Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 134 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
140 OTO Otolaryngology Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 135 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
141 Table OTO-1 Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors Otolaryngology Unmatched Measure (n=257) (n=33) Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding Percentage who have Ph.D. degree Percentage who have another graduate degree Note: Only U.S. allopathic seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included. Sources. NRMP Data Warehouse; Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding in measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 136 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
142 OTO-1 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. Allopathic Seniors Otolaryngology Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Chart OTO-2 Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Otolaryngology Not or More Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Contiguous Ranks 77 Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 137 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
143 Graph OTO-1 1. Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Otolaryngology Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 138 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
144 OTO-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Otolaryngology 1 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 5 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Chart OTO-4 Step 1 Scores USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Otolaryngology Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 139 Step 2 CK Scores Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
145 Graph OTO-2 Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Otolaryngology 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 14 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
146 OTO-5 Number of Research Projects of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Otolaryngology 16 Not None or More Research Projects Chart OTO-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Otolaryngology 2 Not Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the None or More Publications 141 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors,
147 OTO-7 Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Otolaryngology 1 Not None or More Work Experiences Chart OTO-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Otolaryngology 1 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 142 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
148 OTO-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Otolaryngology Not AOA Membership Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding Yes No Yes 12 No 21 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree Yes 1 No Yes 6 No 27 Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding from NIH: Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 143 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
149 PTH Pathology Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 144 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
150 Table PTH-1 Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors Pathology Unmatched Measure (n=218) (n=8) Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding Percentage who have Ph.D. degree Percentage who have another graduate degree Note: Only U.S. allopathic seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included. Sources. NRMP Data Warehouse; Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding in measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 145 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
151 PTH-1 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. Allopathic Seniors Pathology Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Chart PTH-2 Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Pathology Not or More Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Contiguous Ranks Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 146 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
152 Graph PTH-1 1. Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Pathology Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 147 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
153 PTH-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Pathology <= 18 Between 181 and 19 9 Between 191 and 2 21 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 Not 4 Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Chart PTH-4 Step 1 Scores USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Pathology <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Not Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 148 Step 2 CK Scores Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
154 Graph PTH-2 Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Pathology 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 149 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
155 PTH-5 Number of Research Projects of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Pathology 6 Not None or More Research Projects Chart PTH-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Pathology 12 Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 15 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
156 PTH-7 8 Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Pathology Not None or More Work Experiences Chart PTH-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Pathology 7 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 151 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
157 PTH-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Pathology Not AOA Membership Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding Yes No Yes 7 No Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree Yes No Yes Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding from NIH: No 7 Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 152 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
158 PD Pediatrics Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 153 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
159 Table PD-1 Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors Pediatrics Unmatched Measure (n=1,686) (n=49) Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding Percentage who have Ph.D. degree Percentage who have another graduate degree Note: Only U.S. allopathic seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included. Sources. NRMP Data Warehouse; Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding in measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 154 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
160 PD-1 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. Allopathic Seniors Pediatrics 1,8 1,6 1,647 Not 1,4 1,2 1, or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Chart PD-2 Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Pediatrics Not or More Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Contiguous Ranks Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 155 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
161 Graph PD-1 1. Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Pediatrics Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 156 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
162 PD-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Pediatrics <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and 2 18 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 Not 321 Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Chart PD-4 Step 1 Scores USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Pediatrics Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and 22 2 Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 157 Step 2 CK Scores Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
163 Graph PD-2 Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Pediatrics 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 158 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
164 PD-5 Number of Research Projects of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Pediatrics Not None or More Research Projects Chart PD-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Pediatrics 7 Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 159 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
165 PD-7 Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Pediatrics 6 Not 586 Chart PD None or More Work Experiences Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Pediatrics Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 16 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
166 PD-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Pediatrics Not 1,4 1,2 1, Yes AOA Membership 1,267 No 39 1,2 1, Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding 1, Yes No Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree 1,8 1,634 1,6 1,4 1,2 1, Yes No 1,6 1,479 1,4 1,2 1, Yes No Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding from NIH: Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 161 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
167 PM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 162 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
168 Table PM-1 Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unmatched Measure (n=194) (n=23) Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding Percentage who have Ph.D. degree Percentage who have another graduate degree Note: Only U.S. allopathic seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included. Sources. NRMP Data Warehouse; Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding in measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 163 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
169 PM-1 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. Allopathic Seniors Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Chart PM-2 Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Not or More Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Contiguous Ranks 87 Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 164 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
170 Graph PM-1 1. Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 165 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
171 PM-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 Not 36 Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 1 Between 251 and 26 >26 Score Unknown Chart PM-4 Step 1 Scores USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 4 Between 231 and 24 4 Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 166 Step 2 CK Scores Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
172 Graph PM-2 Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 167 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
173 PM-5 Number of Research Projects of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Not None or More Research Projects Chart PM-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 7 Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 168 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
174 PM-7 Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 8 7 Not None or More Work Experiences Chart PM-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 8 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 169 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
175 PM-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Not Yes AOA Membership 164 No Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding 5 Yes No 21 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree Yes No Yes Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding from NIH: No 2 Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 17 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
176 PS Plastic Surgery Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 171 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
177 Table PS-1 Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors Plastic Surgery Unmatched Measure (n=124) (n=39) Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding Percentage who have Ph.D. degree Percentage who have another graduate degree Note: Only U.S. allopathic seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included. Sources. NRMP Data Warehouse; Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding in measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 172 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
178 PS-1 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. Allopathic Seniors Plastic Surgery 1 93 Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Chart PS-2 Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Plastic Surgery Not or More Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Contiguous Ranks 4 Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 173 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
179 Graph PS-1 1. Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Plastic Surgery Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 174 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
180 PS-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Plastic Surgery 5 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 7 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Chart PS-4 Step 1 Scores USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Plastic Surgery Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 4 Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 175 Step 2 CK Scores Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
181 Graph PS-2 Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Plastic Surgery 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 176 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
182 PS-5 Number of Research Projects of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Plastic Surgery Not None or More Research Projects Chart PS-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Plastic Surgery Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Not Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the None or More Publications Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors,
183 PS-7 Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Plastic Surgery 4 Not None or More Work Experiences Chart PS-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Plastic Surgery 4 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 178 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
184 PS-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Plastic Surgery Not 7 65 AOA Membership 8 Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding Yes 51 No Yes 26 No 12 Ph.D. Degree 12 1 Other Graduate Degree Yes No Yes Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding from NIH: No 38 Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 179 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
185 P Psychiatry Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 18 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
186 Table P-1 Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors Psychiatry Unmatched Measure (n=737) (n=78) Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding Percentage who have Ph.D. degree Percentage who have another graduate degree Note: Only U.S. allopathic seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included. Sources. NRMP Data Warehouse; Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding in measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 181 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
187 P-1 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. Allopathic Seniors Psychiatry Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Chart P-2 Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Psychiatry Not or More Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Contiguous Ranks Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 182 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
188 Graph P-1 1. Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Psychiatry Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 183 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
189 P-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Psychiatry Not <= 18 Between 181 and Between 191 and Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Chart P-4 Step 1 Scores USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Psychiatry <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 Not Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 184 Step 2 CK Scores Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
190 Graph P-2 Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Psychiatry 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 185 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
191 P-5 Number of Research Projects of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Psychiatry Not None or More Research Projects Chart P-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Psychiatry 32 Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 186 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
192 P-7 Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Psychiatry 32 Not None or More Work Experiences Chart P-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Psychiatry 28 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 187 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
193 P-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Psychiatry Not Yes AOA Membership 63 No Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding 217 Yes No 66 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree Yes No Yes Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding from NIH: 67 No 68 Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 188 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
194 RO Radiation Oncology Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 189 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
195 Table RO-1 Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors Radiation Oncology Unmatched Measure (n=149) (n=14) Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding Percentage who have Ph.D. degree Percentage who have another graduate degree Note: Only U.S. allopathic seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included. Sources. NRMP Data Warehouse; Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding in measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 19 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
196 RO-1 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. Allopathic Seniors Radiation Oncology 6 6 Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Chart RO-2 Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Radiation Oncology or More Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Contiguous Ranks 13 Not Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 191 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
197 Graph RO-1 1. Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Radiation Oncology Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 192 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
198 RO-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Radiation Oncology 5 Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 2 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Chart RO-4 Step 1 Scores USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Radiation Oncology Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and 21 Between 211 and 22 1 Between 221 and Between 231 and Between 241 and 25 2 Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 193 Step 2 CK Scores Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
199 Graph RO-2 Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Radiation Oncology 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 194 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
200 RO-5 Number of Research Projects of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Radiation Oncology Not None or More Research Projects Chart RO-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Radiation Oncology 14 Not Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the None or More Publications 195 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216 1
201 RO-7 Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Radiation Oncology Not None or More Work Experiences Chart RO-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Radiation Oncology 35 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 196 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
202 RO-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Radiation Oncology Not Yes AOA Membership 94 No Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding 62 Yes No Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree Yes No Yes Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding from NIH: No 14 Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 197 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
203 VS Vascular Surgery Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 198 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
204 Table VS-1 Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors Vascular Surgery Unmatched Measure (n=47) (n=17) Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members Percentage who graduated from one of the 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding Percentage who have Ph.D. degree Percentage who have another graduate degree Note: Only U.S. allopathic seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included. Sources. NRMP Data Warehouse; Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding in measure 1 is from the NIH website ( Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 199 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
205 VS-1 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. Allopathic Seniors Vascular Surgery Not or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Chart VS-2 Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Vascular Surgery Not or More Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Contiguous Ranks Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 2 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
206 Graph VS-1 1. Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Vascular Surgery Probability of Matching Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 21 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
207 VS-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Vascular Surgery Not <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 Between 21 and Between 211 and Between 221 and 23 3 Between 231 and Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Chart VS-4 Step 1 Scores USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Vascular Surgery <= 18 Between 181 and 19 Between 191 and 2 1 Between 21 and 21 3 Between 211 and 22 Between 221 and 23 Not Between 231 and 24 9 Between 241 and Between 251 and >26 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 22 Step 2 CK Scores Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
208 Graph VS-2 Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Vascular Surgery 1. Probability of Matching Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on applicants. Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 23 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
209 VS-5 Number of Research Projects of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Vascular Surgery Not None or More Research Projects Chart VS-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Vascular Surgery 35 Not None or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 24 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
210 VS-7 Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Vascular Surgery 16 Not None or More Work Experiences Chart VS-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Vascular Surgery 24 Not None or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 25 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
211 VS-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Vascular Surgery Not Yes AOA Membership 33 No Graduate of One of the 4 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding 14 Yes 8 33 No 9 Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree Yes No Yes Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Top 4 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding from NIH: 37 No 14 Copyright 216 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 26 Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 216
Charting Outcomes in the Match
ing Outcomes in the Match Characteristics of Applicants Who to Their Preferred Specialty in the 4 Main Residency Match 5th Edition Prepared by: National Resident Matching Program www.nrmp.org August 4
Charting Outcomes in the Match
ing Outcomes in the Match Characteristics of Applicants Who to Their Preferred Specialty in the 29 Main Residency Match 3rd Edition Prepared by: National Resident Matching Program and Association of American
1st Edition. Prepared by: National Resident Matching Program and Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates. January 2014. www.nrmp.
ing Outcomes in the Match International Medical Graduates Characteristics of Applicants Who to Their Preferred Specialty in the 213 Main Residency Match 1st Edition Prepared by: National Resident Matching
Results and Data 2016 Main Residency Match
Results and Data 2016 Main Residency Match April 2016 www.nrmp.org Requests for permission to use these data as well as questions about the content of this publication or National Resident Matching Program
Results and Data 2014 Main Residency Match
Results and Data 2014 Main Residency Match April 2014 www.nrmp.org Requests for permission to use these data as well as questions about the content of this publication or the National Resident Matching
Results and Data. 2015 Main Residency Match. April 2015. www.nrmp.org
Results and Data 2015 Main Residency Match April 2015 www.nrmp.org Requests for permission to use these data as well as questions about the content of this publication or National Resident Matching Program
2012 Physician Specialty Data Book. Center for Workforce Studies. November 2012. Association of American Medical Colleges
Center for Workforce Studies November 2012 Association of American Medical Colleges Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Acknowledgments... 1 Key Findings... 2 Key Definitions... 3 Commonly Used Acronyms...
Careers in Medicine: The U.S. Approach to Career Planning in Medical School. George V. Richard, Ph.D. Director, Careers in Medicine Program
Careers in Medicine: The U.S. Approach to Career Planning in Medical School George V. Richard, Ph.D. Director, Careers in Medicine Program January 18, 2007 The Structure of U.S. Medical Education Baccalaureate
2013 R-1 MAIN RESIDENCY MATCH REPORT
2013 R-1 MAIN RESIDENCY MATCH REPORT carms.ca August 2013 Executive Summary The Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS) is a national, not-for-profit, fee-for-service organization that provides medical
Responsibilities of the Program Coordinator. Presentation Goals. What is a Program Coordinator?
Responsibilities of the Program Coordinator New Coordinators Pre-Course 2008 ACGME Annual Educational Conference Grapevine, Texas Norma R. de Yagcier Senior Accreditation Administrator Presentation Goals
Results and Data Specialties Matching Service 2015 Appointment Year
Results and Data Specialties Matching Service 215 Appointment Year February 215 www.nrmp.org Requests for permission to use these data, as well as questions about the content of this publication or any
Results and Data Specialties Matching Service 2014 Appointment Year
Results and Data Specialties Matching Service 214 Appointment Year February 214 www.nrmp.org Requests for permission to use these data as well as questions about the content of this publication or the
Specialty-specific References for DIOs: Expected Time for Program Director ACGME
-specific References for DIOs: Expected Time for Program Director ACGME Specialty Allergy and Immunology Anesthesiology (effective: July 1, 2016) Adult Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology Critical Care Anesthesiology
Medical Council of New Zealand List of approved qualifications for locum tenens specialist appointments (showing amendments)
Anaesthesia Fellowship of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists Fellowship of the Faculty of Anaesthetists, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons Fellowship of the Royal College of Physicians
Characteristics of Clinical Clerkships
N a t i o n a l B o a r d o f M e d i c a l E x a m i n e r s Characteristics of Clinical Clerkships Fall 2014 Table of Contents Summary... 3 Table 1. Unweighted and Weighted Clerkship Responses... 5 Chart
Perceived and Actual Competitiveness of the Canadian Residency Programs by Specialty
Perceived and Actual Competitiveness of the Canadian Residency Programs by Specialty Author: Alexander Bilbily MD Candidate Supervisor: Dr. Robert Bleakney Date: October 20 th 2012 I do not have an affiliation
Appendix 1 Current list of approved qualifications for Locum Tenens registration
Appendix 1 Current list of approved qualifications for Locum Tenens registration Anaesthesia Fellowship of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists Fellowship of the Faculty of Anaesthetists,
Accredited Schools and Programs
A.B. Freeman School of Business Bachelor of Science in Management (BSM), Master of Business Administration (MBA), Master of Global Management (MGM), Master of Management, Master of Finance (MFIN), Master
4. Clinton Memorial Hospital Family Practice Program ACGME# 1203821626
CLOSED RESIDENCY PROGRAMS 1. Cabrini Medical Center Cardiovascular Disease Fellowship Program ACGME# 1413531114 Internal Medicine Program ACGME# 1403531266 Infectious Disease Program ACGME# 146351097 Podiatry
Roadmap to Residency:
Roadmap to Residency: From Learn Serve Lead Association of American Medical Colleges Roadmap to Residency: From 2006 Association of American Medical Colleges All rights reserved. No part of this publication
Specialty-specific References for DIOs: Program Director Qualifications ACGME
-specific References for DIOs: Program Director Qualifications ACGME Common Program Requirements are in BOLD Specialty Allergy and Immunology Anesthesiology II.A.3.b) current certification in the specialty
PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT. Education and Practice Donna DeGracia MPAS, PA-C St. Catherine University MPAS Program
PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT Education and Practice Donna DeGracia MPAS, PA-C St. Catherine University MPAS Program History of PA Profession Started in the mid 1960s to address shortage of primary care physicians
KEY TENETS OF NRMP POLICY:
KEY TENETS OF NRMP POLICY: Expectations for Match- Participating Programs ARCS 2009 Meeting Laurie S. Curtin, Ph.D. Director, Match Policy FOCUS OF PRESENTATION Pop Quiz Key Tenets of the Match Participation
Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health
Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health Report on Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Faculty Salary Analysis, 2003-2004 With Additional Comments November 29, 2005 Objectives:
Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) Selection Criteria Texas Alpha Chapter at the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB)
Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) Selection Criteria Texas Alpha Chapter at the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) Written May 18, 2003 Last Revised February 25, 2013 Reviewed by: Dr. Lisa Farmer (AOA Faculty
Wisconsin Department of Safety and Professional Services
PLAN AHEAD: Wisconsin Department of Safety and Professional Services Mail To: P.O. Box 8935 Madison, WI 53708-8935 1400 E. Washington Avenue Madison, WI 53703 FAX #: (608) 261-7083 Phone #: (608) 266-2112
2012 Georgia Medical School Graduate Survey Report
2012 Georgia Medical School Graduate Survey Report GEORGIA BOARD FOR PHYSICIAN WORKFORCE DECEMBER 2012 2 PEACHTREE STREET, NW, 36 TH FLOOR, ATLANTA, GA 30303 PHONE (404) 232-7972 / FAX (404) 656-2596 Cherri
Frequently Asked Questions: Resident/Fellow Eligibility Common Program Requirements ACGME
Frequently Asked Questions: Resident/Fellow Eligibility Common Program Requirements ACGME Question In what settings are the new eligibility requirements applicable? [Program Requirements: III.A. and III.A.1.]
The Surgical Workforce in the United States: Profile and Recent Trends
The Surgical Workforce in the United States: Profile and Recent Trends April 2010 The Surgical Workforce in the United States: Profile and Recent Trends April 2010 Acknowledgments The Surgical Workforce
Selection of Future Medical Practice: Using the Australian Medical Schools Outcomes Database to inform national workforce planning
Selection of Future Medical Practice: Using the Australian Medical Schools Outcomes Database to inform national workforce planning Author: David A Kandiah Date: 19 October 2012 I do not have an affiliation
Step 3: Planning a 4 th year curriculum for your career
Step 3: Planning a 4 th year curriculum for your career There are six tasks to accomplish in fourth year: Step 1: Write your CV. Document what you have done thus far. Step 2: Choose a career. Choose wisely:
Match Participation Agreement For Applicants and Programs For the 2015 Main Residency Match
Match Participation Agreement For Applicants and Programs For the 2015 Main Residency Match Terms and Conditions of the Match Participation Agreement Among Applicants, the NRMP, and Participating Programs
REQUEST FOR MEMBERSHIP AND CLINICAL PRIVILEGES
REQUEST FOR MEMBERSHIP AND CLINICAL PRIVILEGES *Applicant Printed Name: *Denotes required fields (Last) (First) (M.I) (Degree) Maiden Name (Alias): (Last) (First) *DOB: *SSN Sex: Male Female *Applicant
APPLICATION FOR A NEW AOA OSTEOPATHIC RESIDENCY TRAINING PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS
APPLICATION FOR A NEW AOA OSTEOPATHIC RESIDENCY TRAINING PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION A INSTRUCTIONS... 2 SECTION B - PROGRAM INFORMATION... 4 SECTION C REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION... 5 SECTION D APPROVAL
Physician Practice Acquisitions
Trend Watch: Physician Practice Acquisitions Tracking Which Physician Practices Hospitals are Acquiring Introduction Are hospitals actively acquiring physician practices? If so, which specialties? In this
The Residency Process
The Residency Process 2014 Table of Contents ADVISING CALENDAR... 2 CONTACT INFORMATION... 3 GLOSSARY OF TERMS... 4 HONORS AND AWARDS... 6 REQUIREMENTS FOR GRADUATION... 8 SCHEDULING FOR FOURTH YEAR...
Introduction There are two approved residency training models for plastic surgery, the Independent Model and the Integrated Model.
TRAINING REQUIREMENTS Introduction There are two approved residency training models for plastic surgery, the Independent Model and the Integrated Model. A plastic surgery program director may choose to
Aggregate Indemnity and Medical Costs for Calendar Year 2012 (CA-IM-2012) Due Date: April 2, 2013
February 1, 2013 525 Market Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105-2767 Voice 415.778.7008 www.wcirbonline.org [email protected] David M. Bellusci Executive Vice President, COO & Chief Actuary To:
Teaching Physician Billing Compliance. Effective Date: March 27, 2012. Office of Origin: UCSF Clinical Enterprise Compliance Program. I.
Teaching Physician Billing Compliance Effective Date: March 27, 2012 Office of Origin: UCSF Clinical Enterprise Compliance Program I. Purpose These Policies and Procedures are intended to clarify the Medicare
Residency Selection Criteria: What Medical Students Perceive as Important
Residency Selection Criteria: What Medical Students Perceive as Important Suzanne Brandenburg, MD *, Tracy Kruzick, MD *, C.T. Lin, MD *, Andrew Robinson, MD, Lorraine J. Adams, MSW * * University of Colorado
MGMA PROVIDER COMPENSATION 2015
Physicians Allergy/Immunology 203 86 Anesthesiology 2,146 120 Anesthesiology: Pain Management 127 59 Cardiology: Electrophysiology 327 126 Cardiology: Invasive 424 148 Cardiology: Invasive-Interventional
You re Invited About Us Distinctions Education Executive Education. Graduate Training Technology Contact Us
You re Invited About Us Distinctions Education Executive Education Graduate Training Technology Contact Us You re Invited Cleveland Clinic Global Physician Associate Program You re Invited Cleveland Clinic
Physician Assistants 2012 Survey
Vermont Department of Health Physician Assistants 2012 Survey Statistical Report 2012 Physician Assistants Survey Statistical Report State of Vermont Peter Shumlin, Governor Agency of Human Services Douglas
TRANSITION TO RESIDENCY
TRANSITION TO RESIDENCY The Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) The Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE), formerly called the dean s letter, is a formal document, completed by medical
Taxonomy Code Mapping Professional Providers
Mapping Professional s Adult Care Nurse Adult Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing 363LA2200X 364SP0809X Adult Health Practice Nursing s Clinical Nurse Specialist Adult Psychiatric/Mental Health Allergy and
September 10, 2007. The Honorable Harry Reid Majority Leader United States Senate S-221 Capitol Building Washington, DC 20510
September 10, 2007 The Honorable Harry Reid Majority Leader United States Senate S-221 Capitol Building Washington, DC 20510 Dear Majority Leader Reid: On behalf of the undersigned organizations, we urge
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (214) 456-1383 5323 Harry Hines Blvd FAX (214) 456-3640 Dallas Texas 75390-8589 FELLOWSHIP APPLICATION CHILD AND ADOLESCENT
Medical Education Policy: Recruitment and Appointment
Medical Education Policy: Recruitment and Appointment Facility: CMC Origin Date: Revision Date: March 2014 Sponsor: GMEC 1. PURPOSE: Carilion Clinic Graduate Medical Education programs follow the eligibility
Survey PRACTICE AND COMPENSATION EXPECTATIONS FOR PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS. 800.780.3500 mdainc.com
Survey PRACTICE AND COMPENSATION EXPECTATIONS FOR PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS 800.780.3500 mdainc.com Overview OBJECTIVE The objective of this survey was to collect and quantify practice and compensation expectations
Taxonomy Code Mapping Professional Providers
Professional s Adult Care Nurse Adult Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing 363LA2200X 364SP0809X Adult Health Nursing s Clinical Nurse Specialist Adult Psychiatric/Mental Health Allergy and Immunology 207K00000X
December 21, 2012. The Honorable Harry Reid Majority Leader U.S. Senate S-221 U.S. Capitol Washington, DC 20510
December 21, 2012 The Honorable Harry Reid Majority Leader U.S. Senate S-221 U.S. Capitol Washington, DC 20510 The Honorable Mitch McConnell Republican Leader U.S. Senate S-230 U.S. Capitol Washington,
AAPA ANNUAL SURVEY REPORT
2013 AAPA ANNUAL SURVEY REPORT PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS AT A GLANCE HIGHLIGHTS OF THE MEDIAN AGE CLINICALLY PRACTICING PAS BY PRIMARY SPECIALTY PRACTICE SETTING Primary Care 32.0% Surgical Subspecialties 27.0%
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE DATABASE
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE DATABASE Each of the standards in this section is followed by relevant questions. In some cases, two closely related standards are placed together, followed by a
Full name/ Title of Medical Qualifications Eligible for Conditional Registration. American Board of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Conferred by s in the United States of America: Board Cert (Anaesthesiology) Board Cert (Anatomic Pathology) Board Cert (Cardiology) Board Cert (Cardiovascular Disease) Board Cert (Clinical Pathology)
Basic Overview of The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and The National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS)
Basic Overview of The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and The National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) Esther Hing Kelly L. Myrick Melissa Park National Center for Health
2009 REVIEW OF PHYSICIAN AND CRNA RECRUITING INCENTIVES
2009 REVIEW OF PHYSICIAN AND CRNA RECRUITING INCENTIVES 2009 Merritt Hawkins & Associates 5001 Statesman Drive Irving, Texas 75063 (800) 876-0500 MerrittHawkins.com SUMMARY REPORT 2009 REVIEW OF PHYSICIAN
Evolving UM SOM Clinical Practice as the Healthcare Environment Changes
Evolving UM SOM Clinical Practice as the Healthcare Environment Changes Introduction to the UM SOM Medical Service Plan This section will cover the following elements: 1. FPI creation, organization, and
Rockbridge Underwriting Agency Limited 3700 Buffalo Speedway, Suite 300 Houston, TX 77098 (713) 874-8800 (713) 874-8899 fax
Rockbridge Underwriting Agency Limited 3700 Buffalo Speedway, Suite 300 Houston, TX 77098 (713) 874-8800 (713) 874-8899 fax Corporate Locum Tenens Underwriting Questionnaire and Application for Professional
MEDICAL PRACTITIONER PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY APPLICATION FORM
MEDICAL PRACTITIONER PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY APPLICATION FORM 1. PERSONAL DETAILS Intended Start Date of Policy: Title: Given Names: Last Name: Gender: M F Date of Birth: Email: Telephone: Mobile: Home
(A) Information needed to identify and classify the hospital, include the following: (b) The hospital number assigned by the department;
3701-59-05 Hospital registration and reporting requirements. Every hospital, public or private, shall, by the first of March of each year, register with and report to the department of health the following
Mississippi Medicaid Enrollment Application (Ordering/Referring/Prescribing Provider)
This application is for the sole purpose of ordering/referring/prescribing items and services for MS Medicaid beneficiaries. This type of enrollment does not allow MS Medicaid to reimburse the applicant/provider
RUSH MEDICAL COLLEGE CLASS of 2016
RUSH MEDICAL COLLEGE CLASS of 06 POSTGRADUATE APPOINTMENTS NUMBER MATCHED BY SPECIALTY AND INSTITUTION NUMBER MATCHED BY SPECIALTY AND INSTITUTION Anesthesiology Mayo School of Grad Med Educ-MN Rush University
Policy and Procedures ACLS & PALS Certification Courses
Policy and Procedures & PALS Courses UMHS Clinical Simulation Center Training of American Heart Association Advanced Cardiac Life Support The Clinical Simulation Center is the primary provider for Advanced
CLINICAL DEPARTMENTS STATEMENT OF FACULTY ORGANIZATION, STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR RANK (Approved 9/27/94) (Revised 10/13/04, 12/20/05, 12/2007)
CLINICAL DEPARTMENTS STATEMENT OF FACULTY ORGANIZATION, STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR RANK (Approved 9/27/94) (Revised 10/13/04, 12/20/05, 12/2007) INTRODUCTION Each Clinical Department 1 will develop the
2014 Statistical Profile of Certified Physician Assistants
2014 Statistical Profile of Certified Physician Assistants An Annual Report of the National Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants NCCPA. 2015. All rights reserved. 1 Message from the President/CEO
TIPS ON RANKING RESIDENCY PROGRAMS
TIPS ON RANKING RESIDENCY PROGRAMS But first, some senior business.......... Senior Requirements Make sure you have enough credits to graduatetaking into account elective maximums - reading electives,
VISTA STAFFING SOLUTIONS. Guide to Locum Tenens
VISTA STAFFING SOLUTIONS Guide to Locum Tenens Guide to Locum Tenens In Latin, locum tenens means one holding a place. In medicine today it means building a solid foundation for a new career, a successful
REPORT TO THE 2015 LEGISLATURE. Report on Findings from the Hawai i Physician Workforce Assessment Project
REPORT TO THE 2015 LEGISLATURE Report on Findings from the Hawai i Physician Workforce Assessment Project Act 18, SSLH 2009 (Section 5), as amended by Act 186, SLH 2012 January 2015 Hawai i Physician Workforce
List of Australian Recognised Medical Specialties
List of Australian Recognised Medical Specialties The List of Australian Recognised Medical Specialties includes those organisations, specialties and qualifications that are recognised as medical specialties
Michigan Department of Community Health Survey of Physician Assistants Frequency Report by School 1
Michigan Department of Community Health Survey of Physician Assistants Frequency Report by School 1 INTRODUCTION Since 2007, the Michigan Department of Community Health (MDCH) has conducted annual surveys
Biostatistics Credit 15 5 10 1. Integrated and Interdisciplinary Training 2/7 Credit 24 24 1
1st Year Hours SEMESTER I Exam or credit Total Lecture Seminar Classes ECTS Anatomy 1/2* Credit 100 20 80 9 Biophysics Exam 55 15 10 30 4 First Aid in Emergency Situations Credit 20 6 4 10 1 Histology
BMA SURVEY OF CONSULTANT WORKING PATTERNS AND ON CALL SERVICES
BMA SURVEY OF CONSULTANT WORKING PATTERNS AND ON CALL SERVICES Health Policy and Economic Research Unit Report author: Duncan Bland Ocber 2014 bma.org.uk British Medical Association, 2014 Index Executive
EXHIBIT 3 SPECIALTY CLASSIFICATION CODES FOR PHYSICIANS, SURGEONS AND OTHER HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS (JUA)
EXHIBIT 3 SPECIALTY CLASSIFICATION FOR PHYSICIANS, SURGEONS AND OTHER HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS () CLASS 005 PHYSICIANS - NO SURGERY 00534 Administrative Medicine No Surgery 00508 Hematology No Surgery 00582
Anesthesiology SIG Transitional/Prelim Year Meeting 8.18.15
Anesthesiology SIG Transitional/Prelim Year Meeting 8.18.15 Panel Dr. Fick St. Vincent Transitional Year and Prelim Medicine Program Director Dr. Choi IU General Surgery and Surgery Prelim Program Director
Medical Registration What does it mean? Who should be registered?
Statement 14 March 2012 Medical Registration What does it mean? Who should be registered? Purpose This statement provides advice to help individuals with medical qualifications to decide whether or not
STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES POLICY: ELIGIBILITY, SELECTION AND APPOINTMENT OF RESIDENTS, FELLOWS AND TRANSFERS PURPOSE: To establish an institutional
ALL PHYSICIANS are to furnish their board certification and current hospital privileges, if applicable. PLEASE LIST:
PHYSICIAN CONTRACT APPLICATION (INDEPENDENT MEDICAL REVIEWER) For the Department of Industrial Relations Division of Workers Compensation P.O. Box 71010 Oakland, CA 94612 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY NO.: INPUT
Official Accreditation Report Academic Year 2014-15 (As of July 1, 2014)
Official Report Introduction This report is a listing of accredited degree and certificate programs at The University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC) for which a national accrediting agency exists. In
CaRMS Forum 2015 R-1 Main Residency Match Preliminary Analysis. Sandra Banner Executive Director and CEO
CaRMS Forum 2015 R-1 Main Residency Match Preliminary Analysis Sandra Banner Executive Director and CEO April 26, 2015 CaRMS by the numbers Client services 830 documents translated for bilingual applications
Basic Standards for Residency Training in Orthopedic Surgery
Basic Standards for Residency Training in Orthopedic Surgery American Osteopathic Association and American Osteopathic Academy of Orthopedics Adopted BOT 2/2006, Effective 7/2006 Revised BOT 9/2007, Effective
The Perfect Answer Medical Answering Service
Medical Answering Service Website: drsansweringservice.com Email: DrsAnsweringService.com PHONE: 770.448.3799 FAX: 770.448.6696 EMAIL: [email protected] Exclusively Serving The Health Care Community
Trends in Physician Compensation: Specialist Physician Growth Coupled with Primary Care Stagnation
Special Report: Trends in Physician Compensation: Specialist Physician Growth Coupled with Primary Care Stagnation Bruce A. Johnson, JD, MPA Physicians in the United States in virtually all medical and
1. To be eligible for Non-Physician Health Care Provider Board Certified Pay (NPBCP), a Nurse Corps officer must:
1. Chapter 4 of OPNAV 7220.17 is amended by replacing the current section 430 with the following: 430. DEFINITION AND ELIGIBILITY 1. To be eligible for Non-Physician Health Care Provider Board Certified
2011 State Physician Workforce Data Book
Center for Workforce Studies November 2011 Association of American Medical Colleges Association of American Medical Colleges 2009 Acknowledgments The 2011 State Physician Workforce Data Book was produced
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS, INC. ORGANIZATIONAL MANUAL
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS, INC. ORGANIZATIONAL MANUAL June 1999 Revised: June 2000 July 2001 December 2002 August 2003 February 2007 June 2007 April 2008 June 2008 June 2009 September 2009 November
NEW and RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR ACCREDITATION as a Practitioner Specify type of Practitioner
NEW and RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR ACCREDITATION as a Practitioner Specify type of Practitioner Surgeon / Anaesthetist / Physician / Surgical Assistant / Allied Health Practitioner at Enter name of Hospital
Responsibility Center Department Procurement Specialist
Responsibility Center Department Procurement Specialist Arts and Sciences, Dietrich School of All Mary Vey Associate VC Human Resources All Molly Scott Athletics All Mike Durica Bradford All Paula Carpinelli
Managing Images Across the Enterprise. Kim Garriott & Louis Lannum July 30, 2015
Managing Images Across the Enterprise Kim Garriott & Louis Lannum July 30, 2015 Objectives Summarize what an enterprise imaging strategy is and address key components Discuss the role of Clinical Engineering
CMS SPECIALTY CODES/HEALTHCARE PROVIDER TAXONOMY CROSSWALK. This table reflects Medicare Specialty Codes as of April 1, 2003.
CMS SPECIALTY CODE CMS SPECIALTY CODES/HEALTHCARE PROVIDER TAXONOMY CROSSWALK This table reflects Medicare Specialty Codes as of April 1, 2003. This table reflects Healthcare Provider Taxonomy Codes (HPTC)
Chapter 02 Licensure Requirements for the Practice of Medical Doctors and Osteopathic Physicians
Chapter 02 Licensure Requirements for the Practice of Medical Doctors and Osteopathic Physicians Licensure by Examination 100 To qualify for admission by examination, an individual shall meet the following
