1 of 2 18/3/ :42 AM
|
|
|
- Debra McCormick
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 of 2 18/3/ :42 AM STUDENT FEEDBACK ON TEACHING Summary Of Evaluation Main Menu Choose another Feedback Student Feedback on Teaching for Academic Year 2012/2013 Semester 2 Date: 18-MAR :40 AM Instructor: Asst Prof Boon Chirn Chye Course: EE2002 (ANALOG ELECTRONICS) Method: TUT, Group: TA04 Actual Class Size: Criteria for consideration Encouraged engagement in the course As a result of the teaching approaches taken by this faculty member, I was involved and interested in the course. Communicated clearly This faculty member was easy to understand in all forms of communication including in classes, online, and in writing. Was approachable This faculty member created opportunities, either in classes, or outside classes, for students to ask questions and seek help. Helped students understand important concepts This faculty member took steps to ensure that I understood how the subject matter of the course is framed by principles or concepts, or how the details fit together into concepts. Encouraged critical thinking in the subject area The teaching approaches of this faculty member encouraged me to think deeply and analytically about the knowledge and concepts in the course. Conducted valuable A The type of class conducted by this faculty member was helpful to my learning. I Presented the subject matter in a methodical and logical way The way this faculty member designed and conducted classes helped to build my knowledge and understanding in a systematic way. Total Responses Mean SD (5) (4) Neutral (3) (2) (1) (Individual) Mean Teaching Score: 4.84 Do you have any further comments on this faculty member's encouragement of engagement in the course? Do you have any further comments on this faculty member's ability to communicate clearly? Do you have any further comments about this faculty member's approachability? Do you have any further comments about how this faculty member helped you understand concepts? Do you have any further comments to make about this faculty member's encouragement of critical thinking? Do you have any further comments on the type of class conducted by this faculty member? Do you have any further comments on the way this faculty member presented the subject matter in a methodical and logical way? Please comment on this faculty member's strengths 1. Prof Boon is able to deliver all his explanation in a clear and concise way. He is one of the best lecturer in my many years of learning. 2. Best tutor ever! I hope that doing the feedback so early in the semester does not mean that he's leaving because I'd probably fail. 3. Prof has done extra miles to assist student in understanding subject and gave his experience and insights on question. Well done sir 4. Very clear explanations.
2 5. The review at the beginning helps understand the course a lot. Please comment on how the faculty member might improve the teaching and learning in this course. 1. He should lecture instead. The current lecturer isnt very good to be honese. 2. excellent, no comment. Other lecturers may learn from him as role model On average, I rate the difficulty of the content taught by this faculty member as compared to the rest of the courses I have taken, as much more difficult 3 slightly more difficult 1 same 3 slightly easier 1 much easier 1 I attended: 80% or more of the classes taught by this faculty member 7 Somewhat less than 80% of the classes taught by this faculty member 2 Less than 50% of the classes taught by this faculty member 0 Where it was required, I prepared for the classes taught by this faculty member: All, or most of the time 4 Some of the time 5 Hardly any of the time 0 Never 0 Faculty Comments (max 500 chars) Characters typed: Nanyang Technological University 2 of 2 18/3/ :42 AM
3 1 of 2 18/3/ :45 AM STUDENT FEEDBACK ON TEACHING Summary Of Evaluation Main Menu Choose another Feedback Student Feedback on Teaching for Academic Year 2012/2013 Semester 2 Date: 18-MAR :43 AM Instructor: Asst Prof Boon Chirn Chye Course: EE2002 (ANALOG ELECTRONICS) Method: TUT, Group: TA05 Actual Class Size: Criteria for consideration Encouraged engagement in the course As a result of the teaching approaches taken by this faculty member, I was involved and interested in the course. Communicated clearly This faculty member was easy to understand in all forms of communication including in classes, online, and in writing. Was approachable This faculty member created opportunities, either in classes, or outside classes, for students to ask questions and seek help. Helped students understand important concepts This faculty member took steps to ensure that I understood how the subject matter of the course is framed by principles or concepts, or how the details fit together into concepts. Encouraged critical thinking in the subject area The teaching approaches of this faculty member encouraged me to think deeply and analytically about the knowledge and concepts in the course. Conducted valuable A The type of class conducted by this faculty member was helpful to my learning. I Presented the subject matter in a methodical and logical way The way this faculty member designed and conducted classes helped to build my knowledge and understanding in a systematic way. Total Responses Mean SD (5) (4) Neutral (3) (2) (1) (Individual) Mean Teaching Score: 4.84 Do you have any further comments on this faculty member's encouragement of engagement in the course? Do you have any further comments on this faculty member's ability to communicate clearly? Do you have any further comments about this faculty member's approachability? Do you have any further comments about how this faculty member helped you understand concepts? Do you have any further comments to make about this faculty member's encouragement of critical thinking? Do you have any further comments on the type of class conducted by this faculty member? Do you have any further comments on the way this faculty member presented the subject matter in a methodical and logical way? Please comment on this faculty member's strengths 1. He make the content very simplified and easy to digest. Clear at passing across the content knowledge. 2. clear 3. He is good. Willing to go the extra mile to teach us. Well done. 4. Detailed explanation of the questions.
4 Please comment on how the faculty member might improve the teaching and learning in this course. 1. Nothing to improve. Too perfect. On average, I rate the difficulty of the content taught by this faculty member as compared to the rest of the courses I have taken, as much more difficult 0 slightly more difficult 1 same 5 slightly easier 0 much easier 2 I attended: 80% or more of the classes taught by this faculty member 7 Somewhat less than 80% of the classes taught by this faculty member 1 Less than 50% of the classes taught by this faculty member 0 Where it was required, I prepared for the classes taught by this faculty member: All, or most of the time 5 Some of the time 3 Hardly any of the time 0 Never 0 Faculty Comments (max 500 chars) Characters typed: Nanyang Technological University 2 of 2 18/3/ :45 AM
5 STUDENT FEEDBACK ON TEACHING Summary Of Evaluation Main Menu Choose another Feedback Student Feedback on Teaching for Academic Year 2012/2013 Semester 2 Date: 18-MAR :45 AM Instructor: Asst Prof Boon Chirn Chye Course: EE2002 (ANALOG ELECTRONICS) Method: TUT, Group: TC01 Actual Class Size: Criteria for consideration Encouraged engagement in the course As a result of the teaching approaches taken by this faculty member, I was involved and interested in the course. Communicated clearly This faculty member was easy to understand in all forms of communication including in classes, online, and in writing. Was approachable This faculty member created opportunities, either in classes, or outside classes, for students to ask questions and seek help. Helped students understand important concepts This faculty member took steps to ensure that I understood how the subject matter of the course is framed by principles or concepts, or how the details fit together into concepts. Encouraged critical thinking in the subject area The teaching approaches of this faculty member encouraged me to think deeply and analytically about the knowledge and concepts in the course. Conducted valuable A The type of class conducted by this faculty member was helpful to my learning. I Presented the subject matter in a methodical and logical way The way this faculty member designed and conducted classes helped to build my knowledge and understanding in a systematic way. Total Responses Mean SD (5) (4) Neutral (3) (2) (1) (Individual) Mean Teaching Score: 4.92 Do you have any further comments on this faculty member's encouragement of engagement in the course? 1. He always ask questions and praise the class if we got it right Do you have any further comments on this faculty member's ability to communicate clearly? 1. He knows really well on what he's teaching deliver to us very well Do you have any further comments about this faculty member's approachability? 1. He provides consultation hours Do you have any further comments about how this faculty member helped you understand concepts? 1. He keeps on repeating the formula or the important key point and that REALLY does help for me to understand Do you have any further comments to make about this faculty member's encouragement of critical thinking? Do you have any further comments on the type of class conducted by this faculty member? Do you have any further comments on the way this faculty member presented the subject matter in a methodical and logical way? 1. One direction! 1 of 2 18/3/ :47 AM
6 Please comment on this faculty member's strengths 1. Prepared extra notes for student to learn. Detailed explanation for tutorial solutions and make it easier for student to understand. He is patient to go through the important points in the topics for our better understanding, before starting on the tutorials. Despite taking some time, he still 2. continued and made the effort to record videos on his teachings for his unfinished part. 3. The way he teach is very clear and I hope to have him giving lectures. 4. Explained concept clearly. Very helpful and provide sufficient materials. He understand student doubt and confusion, and will base on that to teach his tutorial. More often than not, this greatly helps student to understand 3 hours 5. lecture in 50 minutes. 6. Came up with his own crafted notes for his tutorial student. Shows how much passion he has for teaching. 7. Excellent teaching. One in a hundred of all teachers who is really passionate to teach. Please comment on how the faculty member might improve the teaching and learning in this course. 1. Teach the lectures as well. 2. The only improve that I felt is that, he should teach the lecture, not just tutorial. 3. Continue the way he teaches and he will get teaching excellence award. On average, I rate the difficulty of the content taught by this faculty member as compared to the rest of the courses I have taken, as much more difficult 0 slightly more difficult 6 same 5 slightly easier 3 much easier 0 I attended: 80% or more of the classes taught by this faculty member 14 Somewhat less than 80% of the classes taught by this faculty member 0 Less than 50% of the classes taught by this faculty member 0 Where it was required, I prepared for the classes taught by this faculty member: All, or most of the time 6 Some of the time 6 Hardly any of the time 2 Never 0 Faculty Comments (max 500 chars) Characters typed: Nanyang Technological University 2 of 2 18/3/ :47 AM
7 1 of 2 18/3/ :49 AM STUDENT FEEDBACK ON TEACHING Summary Of Evaluation Main Menu Choose another Feedback Student Feedback on Teaching for Academic Year 2012/2013 Semester 2 Date: 18-MAR :48 AM Instructor: Asst Prof Boon Chirn Chye Course: EE2002 (ANALOG ELECTRONICS) Method: TUT, Group: TC02 Actual Class Size: Criteria for consideration Encouraged engagement in the course As a result of the teaching approaches taken by this faculty member, I was involved and interested in the course. Communicated clearly This faculty member was easy to understand in all forms of communication including in classes, online, and in writing. Was approachable This faculty member created opportunities, either in classes, or outside classes, for students to ask questions and seek help. Helped students understand important concepts This faculty member took steps to ensure that I understood how the subject matter of the course is framed by principles or concepts, or how the details fit together into concepts. Encouraged critical thinking in the subject area The teaching approaches of this faculty member encouraged me to think deeply and analytically about the knowledge and concepts in the course. Conducted valuable A The type of class conducted by this faculty member was helpful to my learning. I Presented the subject matter in a methodical and logical way The way this faculty member designed and conducted classes helped to build my knowledge and understanding in a systematic way. Total Responses Mean SD (5) (4) Neutral (3) (2) (1) (Individual) Mean Teaching Score: 4.7 Do you have any further comments on this faculty member's encouragement of engagement in the course? Do you have any further comments on this faculty member's ability to communicate clearly? Do you have any further comments about this faculty member's approachability? Do you have any further comments about how this faculty member helped you understand concepts? Do you have any further comments to make about this faculty member's encouragement of critical thinking? Do you have any further comments on the type of class conducted by this faculty member? Do you have any further comments on the way this faculty member presented the subject matter in a methodical and logical way? Please comment on this faculty member's strengths 1. Make student understand very well. 2. Provided many additional resources to help students understand the topic better. Please comment on how the faculty member might improve the teaching and learning in this course.
8 1. Nil On average, I rate the difficulty of the content taught by this faculty member as compared to the rest of the courses I have taken, as much more difficult 0 slightly more difficult 6 same 5 slightly easier 2 much easier 1 I attended: 80% or more of the classes taught by this faculty member 11 Somewhat less than 80% of the classes taught by this faculty member 3 Less than 50% of the classes taught by this faculty member 0 Where it was required, I prepared for the classes taught by this faculty member: All, or most of the time 5 Some of the time 8 Hardly any of the time 1 Never 0 Faculty Comments (max 500 chars) Characters typed: Nanyang Technological University 2 of 2 18/3/ :49 AM
9 1 of 2 18/3/ :50 AM STUDENT FEEDBACK ON TEACHING Summary Of Evaluation Main Menu Choose another Feedback Student Feedback on Teaching for Academic Year 2012/2013 Semester 2 Date: 18-MAR :49 AM Instructor: Asst Prof Boon Chirn Chye Course: EE2002 (ANALOG ELECTRONICS) Method: TUT, Group: TC06 Actual Class Size: Criteria for consideration Encouraged engagement in the course As a result of the teaching approaches taken by this faculty member, I was involved and interested in the course. Communicated clearly This faculty member was easy to understand in all forms of communication including in classes, online, and in writing. Was approachable This faculty member created opportunities, either in classes, or outside classes, for students to ask questions and seek help. Helped students understand important concepts This faculty member took steps to ensure that I understood how the subject matter of the course is framed by principles or concepts, or how the details fit together into concepts. Encouraged critical thinking in the subject area The teaching approaches of this faculty member encouraged me to think deeply and analytically about the knowledge and concepts in the course. Conducted valuable A The type of class conducted by this faculty member was helpful to my learning. I Presented the subject matter in a methodical and logical way The way this faculty member designed and conducted classes helped to build my knowledge and understanding in a systematic way. Total Responses Mean SD (5) (4) Neutral (3) (2) (1) (Individual) Mean Teaching Score: 4.94 Do you have any further comments on this faculty member's encouragement of engagement in the course? Do you have any further comments on this faculty member's ability to communicate clearly? Do you have any further comments about this faculty member's approachability? Do you have any further comments about how this faculty member helped you understand concepts? Do you have any further comments to make about this faculty member's encouragement of critical thinking? Do you have any further comments on the type of class conducted by this faculty member? Do you have any further comments on the way this faculty member presented the subject matter in a methodical and logical way? Please comment on this faculty member's strengths 1. Recapp with student what we've learnt 2. Taught at a pace which was easy to follow and was clear in his explaination. 3. Clear refresh before going through tutorials.
10 Please comment on how the faculty member might improve the teaching and learning in this course. 1. LET HIM STAY AT ONE CLASS PLEASE!! I dont want to switch tutor :( 2. Too perfect. On average, I rate the difficulty of the content taught by this faculty member as compared to the rest of the courses I have taken, as much more difficult 2 slightly more difficult 1 same 7 slightly easier 2 much easier 4 I attended: 80% or more of the classes taught by this faculty member 16 Somewhat less than 80% of the classes taught by this faculty member 0 Less than 50% of the classes taught by this faculty member 0 Where it was required, I prepared for the classes taught by this faculty member: All, or most of the time 9 Some of the time 7 Hardly any of the time 0 Never 0 Faculty Comments (max 500 chars) Characters typed: Nanyang Technological University 2 of 2 18/3/ :50 AM
11 1 of 2 18/3/ :53 AM STUDENT FEEDBACK ON TEACHING Summary Of Evaluation Main Menu Choose another Feedback Student Feedback on Teaching for Academic Year 2012/2013 Semester 2 Date: 18-MAR :51 AM Instructor: Asst Prof Boon Chirn Chye Course: EE2002 (ANALOG ELECTRONICS) Method: TUT, Group: TC08 Actual Class Size: Criteria for consideration Encouraged engagement in the course As a result of the teaching approaches taken by this faculty member, I was involved and interested in the course. Communicated clearly This faculty member was easy to understand in all forms of communication including in classes, online, and in writing. Was approachable This faculty member created opportunities, either in classes, or outside classes, for students to ask questions and seek help. Helped students understand important concepts This faculty member took steps to ensure that I understood how the subject matter of the course is framed by principles or concepts, or how the details fit together into concepts. Encouraged critical thinking in the subject area The teaching approaches of this faculty member encouraged me to think deeply and analytically about the knowledge and concepts in the course. Conducted valuable A The type of class conducted by this faculty member was helpful to my learning. I Presented the subject matter in a methodical and logical way The way this faculty member designed and conducted classes helped to build my knowledge and understanding in a systematic way. Total Responses Mean SD (5) (4) Neutral (3) (2) (1) (Individual) Mean Teaching Score: 4.84 Do you have any further comments on this faculty member's encouragement of engagement in the course? Do you have any further comments on this faculty member's ability to communicate clearly? Do you have any further comments about this faculty member's approachability? Do you have any further comments about how this faculty member helped you understand concepts? Do you have any further comments to make about this faculty member's encouragement of critical thinking? Do you have any further comments on the type of class conducted by this faculty member? Do you have any further comments on the way this faculty member presented the subject matter in a methodical and logical way? Please comment on this faculty member's strengths 1. Very good tutor. Went through the main points of the topics that was included in the tutorial to make sure the students under him know the basics fully, before teaching/explaning the tutorial questions. 2. clear explanations of important concepts 3. Concepts were presented in a way that are easy to understand
12 4. I like the way he goes through the important points of every chapters. He is able to explain very well. A really great tutor that will go the extra mile for students. NTU needs more people like him to teach. 5. Very detailed explanation of fundamental concepts of each tutorial and tutorial questions. Solution steps are easy to understand and sufficient explanation on how steps are derived. 6. teaching pace is good.. the uploaded video helps alot 7. very clear and concise teaching 8. Put in effort to produce extra notes to assist in our understanding 9. Use of Visualizer to explain the Ans. Uploaded recorded tutorial videos to go through tutorial qns that are not gone through in class due to time constraint. Made learning of the topic easier by going 10. through fundamental concepts at the beginning of each tutorial. 11. his explanations are very detailed and easiy understood. a dedicated tutor. 12. revise briefly on what was taught. Good summary and goes through the questions well Please comment on how the faculty member might improve the teaching and learning in this course. 1. Need more tutors with dedication like him. 2. already very good.. 3. When using of transparency, turn off the light that is behind u to avoid glare on the transparency. 4. Let him teach the module for lectures On average, I rate the difficulty of the content taught by this faculty member as compared to the rest of the courses I have taken, as much more difficult 2 slightly more difficult 4 same 8 slightly easier 1 much easier 3 I attended: 80% or more of the classes taught by this faculty member 18 Somewhat less than 80% of the classes taught by this faculty member 0 Less than 50% of the classes taught by this faculty member 0 Where it was required, I prepared for the classes taught by this faculty member: All, or most of the time 13 Some of the time 3 Hardly any of the time 1 Never 1 Faculty Comments (max 500 chars) Characters typed: Nanyang Technological University 2 of 2 18/3/ :53 AM
13 1 of 2 18/3/ :55 AM STUDENT FEEDBACK ON TEACHING Summary Of Evaluation Main Menu Choose another Feedback Student Feedback on Teaching for Academic Year 2012/2013 Semester 2 Date: 18-MAR :55 AM Instructor: Asst Prof Boon Chirn Chye Course: EE4343 (RADIO FREQUENCY CIRCUITS) Method: LEC, Group: LE Actual Class Size: Criteria for consideration Encouraged engagement in the course As a result of the teaching approaches taken by this faculty member, I was involved and interested in the course. Communicated clearly This faculty member was easy to understand in all forms of communication including in classes, online, and in writing. Was approachable This faculty member created opportunities, either in classes, or outside classes, for students to ask questions and seek help. Helped students understand important concepts This faculty member took steps to ensure that I understood how the subject matter of the course is framed by principles or concepts, or how the details fit together into concepts. Encouraged critical thinking in the subject area The teaching approaches of this faculty member encouraged me to think deeply and analytically about the knowledge and concepts in the course. Conducted valuable A The type of class conducted by this faculty member was helpful to my learning. I Presented the subject matter in a methodical and logical way The way this faculty member designed and conducted classes helped to build my knowledge and understanding in a systematic way. Total Responses Mean SD (5) (4) Neutral (3) (2) (1) (Individual) Mean Teaching Score: 4.82 Do you have any further comments on this faculty member's encouragement of engagement in the course? Do you have any further comments on this faculty member's ability to communicate clearly? Do you have any further comments about this faculty member's approachability? Do you have any further comments about how this faculty member helped you understand concepts? Do you have any further comments to make about this faculty member's encouragement of critical thinking? Do you have any further comments on the type of class conducted by this faculty member? Do you have any further comments on the way this faculty member presented the subject matter in a methodical and logical way? Please comment on this faculty member's strengths 1. Helped students understand important concepts. 2. Awesome! 3. Very interactive and interesting, like it very much
14 Please comment on how the faculty member might improve the teaching and learning in this course. 1. Explain the rationale behind the approach of solving real-life RF circuit design problem. More practical example would make the class more interesting. On average, I rate the difficulty of the content taught by this faculty member as compared to the rest of the courses I have taken, as much more difficult 2 slightly more difficult 5 same 9 slightly easier 1 much easier 0 I attended: 80% or more of the classes taught by this faculty member 16 Somewhat less than 80% of the classes taught by this faculty member 1 Less than 50% of the classes taught by this faculty member 0 I watched recordings of the lectures: 80% or more of the recordings by this faculty member 5 Somewhat less than 80% of the recodings by this faculty member 5 Less than 50% of the recordings by this faculty member 7 Faculty Comments (max 500 chars) Characters typed: Nanyang Technological University 2 of 2 18/3/ :55 AM
15 STUDENT FEEDBACK ON TEACHING Summary Of Evaluation Main Menu Choose another Feedback Student Feedback on Teaching for Academic Year 2012/2013 Semester 2 Date: 18-MAR :53 AM Instructor: Asst Prof Boon Chirn Chye Course: EE4343 (RADIO FREQUENCY CIRCUITS) Method: TUT, Group: F21 Actual Class Size: Criteria for consideration Encouraged engagement in the course As a result of the teaching approaches taken by this faculty member, I was involved and interested in the course. Communicated clearly This faculty member was easy to understand in all forms of communication including in classes, online, and in writing. Was approachable This faculty member created opportunities, either in classes, or outside classes, for students to ask questions and seek help. Helped students understand important concepts This faculty member took steps to ensure that I understood how the subject matter of the course is framed by principles or concepts, or how the details fit together into concepts. Encouraged critical thinking in the subject area The teaching approaches of this faculty member encouraged me to think deeply and analytically about the knowledge and concepts in the course. Conducted valuable A The type of class conducted by this faculty member was helpful to my learning. I Presented the subject matter in a methodical and logical way The way this faculty member designed and conducted classes helped to build my knowledge and understanding in a systematic way. Total Responses Mean SD (5) (4) Neutral (3) (2) (1) (Individual) Mean Teaching Score: 4.67 Do you have any further comments on this faculty member's encouragement of engagement in the course? Do you have any further comments on this faculty member's ability to communicate clearly? Do you have any further comments about this faculty member's approachability? Do you have any further comments about how this faculty member helped you understand concepts? Do you have any further comments to make about this faculty member's encouragement of critical thinking? Do you have any further comments on the type of class conducted by this faculty member? Do you have any further comments on the way this faculty member presented the subject matter in a methodical and logical way? Please comment on this faculty member's strengths 1. Helped students understand important concepts Please comment on how the faculty member might improve the teaching and learning in this course. 1. Explain the rationale behind the approach of solving real-life RF circuit design problem. More practical example would make the class more interesting. 1 of 2 18/3/ :54 AM
16 On average, I rate the difficulty of the content taught by this faculty member as compared to the rest of the courses I have taken, as much more difficult 2 slightly more difficult 0 same 3 slightly easier 0 much easier 0 I attended: 80% or more of the classes taught by this faculty member 3 Somewhat less than 80% of the classes taught by this faculty member 1 Less than 50% of the classes taught by this faculty member 0 Where it was required, I prepared for the classes taught by this faculty member: All, or most of the time 2 Some of the time 3 Hardly any of the time 0 Never 0 Faculty Comments (max 500 chars) Characters typed: Nanyang Technological University 2 of 2 18/3/ :54 AM
17 1 of 2 18/3/ :54 AM STUDENT FEEDBACK ON TEACHING Summary Of Evaluation Main Menu Choose another Feedback Student Feedback on Teaching for Academic Year 2012/2013 Semester 2 Date: 18-MAR :54 AM Instructor: Asst Prof Boon Chirn Chye Course: EE4343 (RADIO FREQUENCY CIRCUITS) Method: TUT, Group: F22 Actual Class Size: Criteria for consideration Encouraged engagement in the course As a result of the teaching approaches taken by this faculty member, I was involved and interested in the course. Communicated clearly This faculty member was easy to understand in all forms of communication including in classes, online, and in writing. Was approachable This faculty member created opportunities, either in classes, or outside classes, for students to ask questions and seek help. Helped students understand important concepts This faculty member took steps to ensure that I understood how the subject matter of the course is framed by principles or concepts, or how the details fit together into concepts. Encouraged critical thinking in the subject area The teaching approaches of this faculty member encouraged me to think deeply and analytically about the knowledge and concepts in the course. Conducted valuable A The type of class conducted by this faculty member was helpful to my learning. I Presented the subject matter in a methodical and logical way The way this faculty member designed and conducted classes helped to build my knowledge and understanding in a systematic way. Total Responses Mean SD (5) (4) Neutral (3) (2) (1) (Individual) Mean Teaching Score: 4.92 Do you have any further comments on this faculty member's encouragement of engagement in the course? Do you have any further comments on this faculty member's ability to communicate clearly? Do you have any further comments about this faculty member's approachability? Do you have any further comments about how this faculty member helped you understand concepts? Do you have any further comments to make about this faculty member's encouragement of critical thinking? Do you have any further comments on the type of class conducted by this faculty member? Do you have any further comments on the way this faculty member presented the subject matter in a methodical and logical way? Please comment on this faculty member's strengths Please comment on how the faculty member might improve the teaching and learning in this course.
18 On average, I rate the difficulty of the content taught by this faculty member as compared to the rest of the courses I have taken, as much more difficult 1 slightly more difficult 4 same 6 slightly easier 1 much easier 0 I attended: 80% or more of the classes taught by this faculty member 12 Somewhat less than 80% of the classes taught by this faculty member 0 Less than 50% of the classes taught by this faculty member 0 Where it was required, I prepared for the classes taught by this faculty member: All, or most of the time 5 Some of the time 6 Hardly any of the time 0 Never 0 Faculty Comments (max 500 chars) Characters typed: Nanyang Technological University 2 of 2 18/3/ :54 AM
Spring 2013 Structured Learning Assistance (SLA) Program Evaluation Results
Crafton Hills College RRN 682 July 2013 Research Brief Spring 2013 Structured Learning Assistance (SLA) Program Evaluation Results Prepared by Lorena Guadiana Summary of Main Findings 85% of respondents
This material is intended for use by undergraduate students who are contemplating taking a course with me.
This material is intended for use by undergraduate students who are contemplating taking a course with me. I have pasted, without edits, all Section C comments from my recent online evaluations from SIRS
Subject Experience Survey Instrument Questions
Quality of Teaching and Learning - Subject Review Procedure SCHEDULE A Subject Experience Survey (SES) SCHEDULE Subject Experience Survey Instrument Questions The SES is structured so as to have a group
Student Feedback on Online Summer Courses
Student Feedback on Online Summer Courses October 8, 2015 Santa Clara University Office of Assessment Report Introduction In the summer of 2015, approximately 700 undergraduate students were enrolled in
COS 160 - Course Assessment Student Responses
COS 160: Course Assessment Student Responses from Focus Group Sessions Spring 2005 Office of Academic Assessment University of Southern Maine Spring 2005 Introduction The Computer Science department was
QUESTION: How has the class helped you grow/change as a communicator in the world of work?
QUESTION: How has the class helped you grow/change as a communicator in the world of work? The class helped me in knowing that it's ok to make mistakes as long as you learn by them. By learning the different
A Comparison of Student Learning in an Introductory Logic Circuits Course: Traditional Face-to-Face vs. Fully Online
A Comparison of Student Learning in an Introductory Logic Circuits Course: Traditional Face-to-Face vs. Fully Online Dr. Brock J. LaMeres Assistant Professor Electrical & Computer Engineering Dept Montana
Q1 How do you prefer to access your online classes? Check all that apply. 18% 53% 17% 12% 0 90 2.2
Summer Session III 2014 Distance Learning Aggregate Survey Results In order to strengthen UWG s distance and distributed learning programs, separate evaluations have been developed for distance courses.
Mathematics Objective 6.) To recognize the limitations of mathematical and statistical models.
Spring 20 Question Category: 1 Exemplary Educational Objectives Mathematics THECB Mathematics Objective 1.) To apply arithmetic, algebraic, geometric, higher-order thinking, and statistical methods to
STUDENT SATISFACTION. Computer Networks and Distributed Systems
STUDENT SATISFACTION Below are sample student comments from the module feedback questionnaires, in response to the question: Please describe what you liked most about the module and why. The complete set
MSU IDEA Pilot Study Preliminary Results
MSU IDEA Pilot Study Preliminary Results This document was a quick attempt to share what was learned from the pilot of a new course evaluation form created and administered by the IDEA Center (http://ideaedu.org/services/student-ratings).
Getting Started with WebCT
Getting Started with WebCT Tanya Goette Assistant Professor ISC Dept CBX 12 Georgia College & State University Milledgeville, GA 31061 tgoette@mail.gcsu.edu 478-445-5721 fax: 478-445-5249 Abstract This
Creating a learning experience that never stops. Saint Stephen s College in Australia finds early success with blended learning
Creating a learning experience that never stops Saint Stephen s College in Australia finds early success with blended learning Overview Saint Stephen s College is a co-educational, Preparatory-to-Year
The only 20-hour comprehensive and interactive SAT Prep DVD course. Get your students ready!
The only 20-hour comprehensive and interactive SAT Prep DVD course. Get your students ready! The perfect alternative to the unaffordable tutoring industry! Half-Price Deal for NEO-RLS Members privatetutorsat.com/neo23
SURVEY. A high school uses student surveys in every class to gather instructional feedback for teachers.
SURVEY A high school uses student surveys in every class to gather instructional feedback for teachers. Data from multiple formative surveys and online endof-course surveys combine to help teachers improve
course evaluations survey results arts and science students union june 2014
course evaluations survey results arts and science students union june 2014 Introduction As you know, the course evaluation system for the Faculty of Arts and Science in the 2012-2013 academic year switched
The Videoconferencing Classroom: What Do Students Think? A. Mark Doggett Western Kentucky University. Introduction
The Videoconferencing Classroom: What Do Students Think? A. Mark Doggett Western Kentucky University Introduction The advantages of video conferencing in educational institutions are well documented. Scholarly
Best Practices for Online Courses. 100 Quality Indicators for Online Course Design
Best Practices for Online Courses 100 Quality Indicators for Online Course Design The following criteria are meant to act as guidelines for the course development process. Some of these guidelines would
California State University, Stanislaus PROGAM ASSESSMENT ANNUAL UPDATE
California State University, Stanislaus PROGAM ASSESSMENT ANNUAL UPDATE PROGRAM NAME: Philosophy COLLEGE YEAR: 2008-2009 PLAN OVERVIEW: 1: Direct assessment of learning objective contextual knowledge of
Assessment and Instruction: Two Sides of the Same Coin.
Assessment and Instruction: Two Sides of the Same Coin. Abstract: In this paper we describe our research and development efforts to integrate assessment and instruction in ways that provide immediate feedback
IUPUI Online Mathematics Academy Summer 2014 Student Questionnaire Report
IUPUI Online Mathematics Academy Summer 2014 Student Questionnaire Report Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis (IUPUI) Report Completed by: Office of Student Data, Analysis, and Evaluation
Making quant tutorials work! DOs and DON'Ts of classroom inversion. Dr Ralf Becker The University of Manchester
Making quant tutorials work! DOs and DON'Ts of classroom inversion Dr Ralf Becker The University of Manchester Does this scenario sound familiar? Tutorial room Two dozen students and a Graduate Teaching
Class Wiki: http://soloway.pbworks.com/w/page/45158676/441%20course
9/7/2015 Page 1 of 5 Syllabus TITLE: Mobile App Development for Entrepreneurs CSE 441 Fall 2015 Section 1: 3:00-4:30pm, 1121 LBME Section 2: 4:30-6:00pm, 1121 LBME Best practices in the software engineering
No overall dissatisfaction w/course curriculum. I never consulted w/my PS advisor. Was not so sure it was ever necessary.
Open-ended Questions Exit Survey Department of Political Science Spring 2004 #1 Negative feedback elaboration -More political theory classes would be helpful -Undergraduate lower division classes were
Student Evaluation of Teaching - Form SRT Form - Official End-of-Semester Evaluation of Teaching
University of Minnesota NSCI 4100 001 Fall 2012 01/10/2013 Number of questionnaires = 17 Page 1 of 2 Dr. McLoon was one of the best instructors I have ever had. He presented difficult material in an interesting
Syllabus: their bible
COM 2.05 Online Survey/Results From: Wilson, Eric Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 6:44 AM To: Louella Nelson; Weispfenning, John; Hanlon, Anna; Kagawa, Akemi; Cooper, Barbara; Shine, Brenda; Flowers, Carol;
Digitally Smart Enhance Your Career, or Start a New One
Digital Marketing Certification Courses Enhance Your Career, or Start a New One Training Courses Earn your Digital Marketing Certification L Ecole Supérieure Multinationale des Télécommunications (ESMT)
Analysis and Survey Design by Strategic Technology Solutions Rich La Valley, President
Analysis and Survey Design by Strategic Technology Solutions Rich La Valley, President Methodology Sample of College Graduate who went through IB from Social Network Sites Email sent to over 650 potential
Developing Self-Directed Learning Strategy for a Construction Project Management Course
Developing Self-Directed Learning Strategy for a Construction Project Management Course Cynthia Changxin Wang 1 Abstract Self-Directed Learning is generally regarded as an important skill throughout life
LoudCloud Student Walk to Class Tutorial
LoudCloud Student Walk to Class Tutorial Welcome to the GCU Student Walk to Class Tutorial for LoudCloud. The Walk to Class tutorial series consists of several short tutorials that will allow you to view
Preparing to Serve: Online Training Modules
Preparing to Serve: Online Training Modules MASSEN, A. AND KOWALEWSKI, B. (EDS.) COPYRIGHT 2010. WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY PREPARING TO SERVE: ONLINE TRAINING MODULES PROFESSIONALISM CULTURAL SENSITIVITY
SOE Course Evaluations
1 of 5 7/31/2015 9:52 AM SOE Course Evaluations Students Instructors TAs Logout Evaluation for EDU110, sec. 002 Q 1 2 3 4 5 6 View Results Submissions Analysis Table Download responses Termcode CRN Course
Number of certifications earned by students before leaving Southern Union.
Unit Number Unit Name Person Responsible 1515 Computer Science (CIS) Doss Buckelew : 1 Operational To have students graduate with not only a degree, but also with professional certifications in various
Student diaries: using technology to produce alternative forms of feedback
Student diaries: using technology to produce alternative forms of feedback NUZ QUADRI University of Hertfordshire PETER BULLEN University of Hertfordshire AMANDA JEFFERIES University of Hertfordshire 214
Instructional Scaffolding for Online Courses
Instructional Scaffolding for Online Courses Helen M. Grady Mercer University grady_h@mercer.edu Abstract Instructional scaffolding is a process by which an instructor supports a student in executing a
CALCULUS COURSES AT THE COMPUTER SCIENCE FACULTY, THE UNIVERSITY OF INDONESIA
CALCULUS COURSES AT THE COMPUTER SCIENCE FACULTY, THE UNIVERSITY OF INDONESIA Kasiyah MACHMUDIN Department of Mathematics, University of Indonesia Computer Science Faculty, University of Indonesia kasiyah@makara.cso.ui.ac.id
Social Media Marketing Course Outline
Social Media Marketing Course Outline Taught by real professionals/ teachers who guide you through every topic step by step. You can now avoid all the frustration and disappointment that comes when trying
Eective strategies for online testing in large classes
School of Mathematics and Statistics University of New South Wales, Australia Maple TA User Summit 2014 UNSW Australia and me University of New South Wales Sydney Australia 54000 students Large Science
What people who attend Linton Sellen s Leadership Training have to say:
What people who attend Linton Sellen s Leadership Training have to say: Excellent course, couldn t have been better. Training content and knowledge and delivery are exceptional. I've been to many management
Teaching Evaluations Summary. Alexander Ovodenko Washington University in St. Louis
Alexander Ovodenko Washington University in St. Louis I have served as a Lecturer for two courses at Washington University in St. Louis: Fall 2014, International Institutions (Pol Sci 3024, 7 students)
!!! Software Engineering 10! Using videos in teaching software engineering IAN SOMMERVILLE
Software Engineering 10 Using videos in teaching software engineering IAN SOMMERVILLE 1 As part of the teaching material to support the book, I have made a number of videos on software engineering topics
Teaching Public Speaking Online
Teaching Public Speaking Online By Tim Sheldon Bryant & Stratton College January 27, 2009 I teach public speaking Online using PowerPoint audio, and it has proven to be as effective in developing speaking
Redesigning Online Deductive Logic to Improve Retention
Redesigning Online Deductive Logic to Improve Retention Daniel R. Boisvert Marvin J. Croy UNC Charlotte SoTL Project Report DanBoisvert@uncc.edu mjcroy@uncc.edu Abstract Over the past three years, the
Online Group-Work Guidelines
The University of Manchester CEEBL Centre for Excellence in Enquiry Based Learning Online Group-Work Guidelines By Kate Jones *** *** CEEBL Centre for Excellence in Enquiry Based Learning Online Group-Work
White Paper: Designing Resourceful Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) for Healthcare Applications
Accelerate Development Reduce Time to Product Automate Critical Tasks White Paper: Designing Resourceful Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) for Healthcare Applications The ASHVINS GROUP, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon
Fundamentals of Project Management
1201 Peachtree St. Suite 622 Atlanta GA 30362 info@pm4dev.com Fundamentals of Project Management This course is a comprehensive introduction to development project management. Designed for people who want
Blended Course Evaluation Standards
Introduction: Blended learning is defined as to combine Face-to-Face instruction with computer-mediated instruction Graham 2006. Mixing technology and content does not necessarily yield effective learning.
Analysis of the Effectiveness of Online Learning in a Graduate Engineering Math Course
The Journal of Interactive Online Learning Volume 1, Number 3, Winter 2003 www.ncolr.org ISSN: 1541-4914 Analysis of the Effectiveness of Online Learning in a Graduate Engineering Math Course Charles L.
Information and Communication Technology 2014
Information and Communication Technology 2014 Project: Audio training module Elective context: Audio and video production This sample has been compiled by the QCAA to help teachers plan and develop assessment
Creative Media Strategies and Techniques COMSTRAT 562
Creative Media Strategies and Techniques COMSTRAT 562 Course Overview: This course will focus on the process of creating effective marketing communications materials for business with an emphasis on advertising.
Enhancing Nursing Students Drug Calculation Skills Through Self-directed Learning
Enhancing Nursing Students Drug Calculation Skills Through Self-directed Learning Ms Chen Hui-Chen Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies The ability to do self-directed learning (SDL) is beneficial to nursing
Agent s Handbook. Your guide to satisfied customers
Agent s Handbook Your guide to satisfied customers Introduction LiveChat is a tool that facilitates communication between a company and its customers. Agents who wield that tool use it to make customers
GEON04 kursutvärdering 2016. What did you think overall about the course? (5 is the highest, 1 is the lowest)
Course evaluation for GEON04 2016 report For 2016, it was the fifth time the Master course GEON04 was taught. This year 14 students took the course. A very good group size. The statics for the course are
Response Rates in Online Teaching Evaluation Systems
Response Rates in Online Teaching Evaluation Systems James A. Kulik Office of Evaluations and Examinations The University of Michigan July 30, 2009 (Revised October 6, 2009) 10/6/2009 1 How do you get
Mark J. Quathamer Brevard Community College Quality Enhancement Plan White Paper
Running Head: BCC MATH SUCCESS Preparing for math success: Brevard Community College preparatory math courses Mark J. Quathamer Brevard Community College Quality Enhancement Plan White Paper Running Head:
Sub-question 6: What are student and faculty perceptions concerning their frequency of use of the DDP?
1 Sub-question 6: What are student and faculty perceptions concerning their frequency of use of the DDP? Data were gathered to describe this question from two of the three approaches. No data were gathered
UNIVERSITY OF MALTA THE MATRICULATION CERTIFICATE EXAMINATION ADVANCED LEVEL COMPUTING. May 2011
UNIVERSITY OF MALTA THE MATRICULATION CERTIFICATE EXAMINATION ADVANCED LEVEL COMPUTING May 2011 EXAMINERS REPORT MATRICULATION AND SECONDARY EDUCATION CERTIFICATE EXAMINATIONS BOARD AM Computing May 2011
MathXL Getting Started Guide for Students
MathXL Getting Started Guide for Students Copyright Notice Copyright 2013 by Pearson Education. All rights reserved. No part of the contents of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or
Beyond Social Networking: Using Facebook to Promote Student Engagement, Study Skills, and Critical Thinking Amy J. Marin Phoenix College
Beyond Social Networking: Using Facebook to Promote Student Engagement, Study Skills, and Critical Thinking Amy J. Marin Phoenix College Cliff Stroop, pictured here relaxing at home. I think ALL classes
EFFECTIVE WAYS TO LINK REALITY TO TEACHING IN FINANCE IN THE CLASSROOM
EFFECTIVE WAYS TO LINK REALITY TO TEACHING IN FINANCE IN THE CLASSROOM Zhang Weina Department of Finance, NUS Business School Introduction Many students in NUS Business School take finance courses to prepare
Using ipads in Undergraduate Mathematics
Using ipads in Undergraduate Mathematics Eric J. Thornburg This paper was completed and submitted in partial fulfillment of the Master Teacher Program, a 2-year faculty professional development program
A teacher s experience using blogs. Gillian May. Lawrence Area School
May G., (2011). A teacher s experience of using blogs. Computers in New Zealand Schools: Learning, teaching, technology. Vol. 23, No. 2. pp 153-158 A teacher s experience using blogs Gillian May Lawrence
EXPERIMENTAL ONLINE CASE STUDY FOR A BREAKTHROUGH IN STUDENT ENGAGEMENT: DESCRIPTION AND RESULTS
EXPERIMENTAL ONLINE CASE STUDY FOR A BREAKTHROUGH IN STUDENT ENGAGEMENT: DESCRIPTION AND RESULTS James Theroux Isenberg School of Management University of Massachusetts Email: theroux@som.umass.edu Clare
OPEN.MICHIGAN Database Project
OPEN.MICHIGAN Database Project Alexis Antracoli Gin Corden Andrew Gordon Sarah Mackintosh Dave Malicke Christine Murray Table of Contents Client Information and Needs... 2 Users... 2 Contents... 3 E-R
Northern Virginia Community College: Hybrid Course Template
Northern Virginia Community College: Hybrid Course Template Section I: Blackboard Design This section includes a table that provides a template for setting up a hybrid course s Blackboard site. The guidelines
Faculty Development Course Registration and Course Access Manual
Registration and Course Access Manual Academic Affairs May 2011 Version 1.0 1 P age As part of Palm Beach State College's efforts to improve student learning, an online faculty development course has been
Business Management. Is Business Management right for me? Are all Business Management degrees the same? Specialisms
Business Management Is Business Management right for me? If you have an interest in working in the world of management and business then Business Management can set you up well. To get the best out of
Reflective Writing. How do you write reflectively? Stages of reflective thinking
Reflective Writing Reflective Writing There are a variety of reasons you might need to write reflectively. When you apply for jobs, undertake self-evaluation at work or whilst studying, or when writing
Data Analytics Experiential Learning
Data Analytics Experiential Learning Teresa Nickeson, faculty Nicholas Rivera, undergraduate student CS / Math Department University of Dubuque 2000 University Ave. Dubuque, IA 52001 TNickeson@dbq.edu
The Faculty Evaluation Process for online and hybrid courses is a little different than the same process for face-toface
The Faculty Evaluation Process for online and hybrid courses is a little different than the same process for face-toface classes The Faculty Evaluation process contains five steps. This handout will cover
HND degree top-up students perceptions of their experience at the University of Worcester: how can future students experiences be improved?
HND degree top-up students perceptions of their experience at the University of Worcester: how can future students experiences be improved? Lerverne Barber and Dr Nick Breeze University of Worcester (l.barber@worc.ac.uk
Phase 2 The System Specification
Team W2 Video-Conferencing-Based Classroom Extension Sergio Bana Andrew Carland Matt Dyson Sarah Jordan Andrew Wantuch Phase 2 The System Specification 1 P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTORY PROBLEM
Mastery-based, Modularized, Self-paced Courses for Student Success: There is more than one way to Emporium!
Mastery-based, Modularized, Self-paced Courses for Student Success: There is more than one way to Emporium! Insert Picture of your choice AMATYC Conference Jacksonville, Florida November 2012 Dr. Kim Tsai
EMPLOYER/EMPLOYEE RELATIONS CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS
EMPLOYER/EMPLOYEE RELATIONS CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS Human Resources Division Office of Employer/Employee Relations November TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... I. RESPONDENT DEMOGRAPHICS...
Sean Getchell EDTC 6332 Summer II 2014. Design Document
Design Document Goal Company X s goal for this course is to teach learners the importance of collaboration, how to use and apply three collaboration tools (PBWorks, Google Drive, Dropbox) to their professional
Blackboard Pilot Report July 12, 2013
Blackboard Pilot Report July 12, 2013 Introduction DeSales will adopt Blackboard Learn 9.1 as its Learning Management System to replace ANGEL in AY 2013-14. All courses starting on or after August 19th,
CLASS PARTICIPATION: MORE THAN JUST RAISING YOUR HAND
STUDENT LEARNING SUPPORT TUTORIAL PRODUCED BY THE CENTER FOR TEACHING AND FACULTY DEVELOPMENT CLASS PARTICIPATION: MORE THAN JUST RAISING YOUR HAND CHAPTER 1: LEARNING THROUGH CLASS PARTICIPATION CLASS
TEACHING PORTFOLIO. BENJAMIN PINGEL Communication Instructor MARCH 8, 2016
TEACHING PORTFOLIO Communication Instructor MARCH 8, 2016 Resume ABOUT ME EDUCATION I am a Communication instructor with some great, practical experience. Hello. There are several things I m passionate
It is vital that you understand the rationale behind the correct answer(s) as wel as the incorrect answer options.
Getting the Most out of ATI www.atitesting.com What is ATI? ATI is an online resource that will be used throughout the nursing program to help you learn about nursing practice as well as help prepare you
GEOGRAPHY COURSES THIRD-YEAR HANDBOOK 2015-16
GEOGRAPHY COURSES THIRD-YEAR HANDBOOK 2015-16 Disclaimer This handbook does not replace the University s regulations. In any case of conflict, the regulations take priority. The information contained within
Online Course Checklist for Instructional Designers and Faculty Developers
Online Course Checklist for Instructional Designers and Faculty Developers The intent of this document is to serve as a tool for instructional designers and faculty developers to use during the course
OBL4HE: students' use of online learning resources and preferences for design and content. February 2012. Rebecca Reynolds
Rebecca Section name OBL4HE: students' use of online learning resources and preferences for design and content February 2012 Rebecca Reynolds University of Reading 2012 Wednesday 8 August 2012 Page 1 Introduction
JMU Educational Technology Program Alumni Survey Spring 2012
James Madison University Educational Technology Graduate Survey Executive Summary On March 2, 2012, a survey was sent to individuals who have graduated since 2007 with Master s degrees or certificates
AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO TEACHING SPREADSHEET SKILLS. Mindell Reiss Nitkin, Simmons College. Abstract
AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO TEACHING SPREADSHEET SKILLS Mindell Reiss Nitkin, Simmons College Abstract As teachers in management courses we face the question of how to insure that our students acquire the
Making quant tutorials work! DOs and DON'Ts of classroom inversion. Dr Ralf Becker Economics, School of Social Sciences The University of Manchester
Making quant tutorials work! DOs and DON'Ts of classroom inversion Dr Ralf Becker Economics, School of Social Sciences The University of Manchester Does this scenario sound familiar? Tutorial room Two
Jennifer M. Scagnelli Comprehensive Exam Question (O Bannon) Instructional Technology - Fall 2007
Jennifer M. Scagnelli Comprehensive Exam Question (O Bannon) Instructional Technology - Fall 2007 Instructional design is a system of procedures used to plan and develop instructional materials and activities
Examples of Self-Reflection Activities
Examples of Self-Reflection Activities Elementary Education Professional Education The KCKCC and JCC candidates in EL312 Reading & Writing Connections complete weekly reflections about their learning (including
Impact of On-line Lectures for an Undergraduate Mechanisms Course
Impact of On-line Lectures for an Undergraduate Mechanisms Course William L. Cleghorn and Hapreet Dhariwal University of Toronto cleghrn@mie.utoronto.ca and harpreet.dhariwal@utoronto.ca Abstract This
Blackboard Development Checklist for Online Courses
Blackboard Development Checklist for Online Courses Met Course Development Rubrics The following rubrics should be used as benchmarks to assist faculty with developing and maintaining their online courses.
School of Psychology Undergraduate Case Studies. The Student Experience
School of Psychology Undergraduate Case Studies The Student Experience Within the School of Psychology, we are committed to making sure that our students have an outstanding experience while they are studying
CC2002 CREATIVE AND CRITICAL THINKING STUDENT
CC2002 CREATIVE AND CRITICAL THINKING STUDENT Reflective Learning Journal What is Reflective Learning Journal? Reflective journal is designed to help you think deeply about your learning, especially on
The Challenge of Helping Adults Learn: Principles for Teaching Technical Information to Adults
The Challenge of Helping Adults Learn: Principles for Teaching Technical Information to Adults S. Joseph Levine, Ph.D. Michigan State University levine@msu.edu One of a series of workshop handouts made
Redesigned College Algebra. Southeast Missouri State University Ann Schnurbusch
Redesigned College Algebra Southeast Missouri State University Ann Schnurbusch Why redesign the course? Developmental courses previously redesigned College Algebra already in transition High failure rate
The move to Moodle: Perspective of academics in a College of Business
The move to Moodle: Perspective of academics in a College of Business Dr Robyn Walker College of Business, Massey University Associate Professor Mark Brown Office of the Assistant Vice Chancellor (Academic
6. What would you like to say about the instructor s effectiveness as a teacher?
!1 COMMENTS ARE MADE BY STUDENTS ON THEIR QUESTIONNAIRES. WE HAVE MADE NOT EDITING OR SELECTING OF COMMENTS. ALL TYPOS ARE AS WRITTEN. For each of the areas below answer the question by placing a check
How to use OSLO in Optical Design. By: Jeffrey Patel. Advisor: Dr. Robert MacIntyre. Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science
How to use OSLO in Optical Design By: Jeffrey Patel Advisor: Dr. Robert MacIntyre Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science Rochester Institute of Technology March 2, 2009 1 Abstract OSLO is the name
How will the transition to the new Adobe Forums be handled?
Why are you changing the Adobe Forums? In response to community feedback through surveys, we are incorporating many user-requested features into Adobe Forums and also making changes to the underlying technology
CREATING CONDITIONS FOR EFFECTIVE PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
CREATING CONDITIONS FOR EFFECTIVE PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT EMPLOYEE ON-LINE SURVEY EDDIE SHEPPARD PhD & PHILIP COPPARD JANUARY 11, 2016 STORMY LAKE CONSULTING Background The CBE is committed to improving its
Fire Science Technology. Annual Report 2009-2010
Fire Science Technology Annual Report 2009-2010 FTE Department Totals 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Fire Science 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 Fire Science 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008
Realizeit at the University of Central Florida
Realizeit at the University of Central Florida Results from initial trials of Realizeit at the University of Central Florida, Fall 2014 1 Based on the research of: Dr. Charles D. Dziuban, Director charles.dziuban@ucf.edu