A SIMPLE OPTION FORMULA FOR GENERAL JUMPDIFFUSION AND OTHER EXPONENTIAL LÉVY PROCESSES


 Doris Reed
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 A SIMPLE OPTION FORMULA FOR GENERAL JUMPDIFFUSION AND OTHER EXPONENTIAL LÉVY PROCESSES ALAN L. LEWIS Envision Financial Systems and OptionCity.net August, 00 Revised: September, 00 Abstract Option values are wellknown to be the integral of a discounted transition density times a payoff function; this is just martingale pricing. It s usually done in Sspace, where S is the terminal security price. But, for Lévy processes the Sspace transition densities are often very complicated, involving many special functions and infinite summations. Instead, we show that it s much easier to compute the option value as an integral in Fourier space and interpret this as a Parseval identity. The formula is especially simple because (i) it s a single integration for any payoff and (ii) the integrand is typically a compact expressions with just elementary functions. Our approach clarifies and generalizes previous work using characteristic functions and Fourier inversions. For example, we show how the residue calculus leads to several variation formulas, such as a wellknown, but less numerically efficient, BlackScholes style formula for call options. The result applies to any Europeanstyle, simple or exotic option (without pathdependence) under any Lévy process with a known characteristic function. All comments welcome and encouraged. Contact info. : Tel: (949) , Bayside Cove West, Newport Beach, Ca 9660 USA
2 . INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY The benchmark model for security prices is geometric Brownian motion. A relatively simple yet powerful generalization is the class of all continuoustime process where all nonoverlapping increments Xt Xt = log( St / St ) are independent random variables with stationary distributions. This set of processes X t are the Lévy processes or processes with stationary independent increments. [see the monographs by Sato (996) and Bertoin (999)]. They consist of a combination of a linear drift, a Brownian motion, and an independent jump process Here we provide a solution to the associated Europeanstyle option valuation problem. These models help explain some, but not all, of the welldocumented deviations from the benchmark model. Lévy process models can be good fits to daily stock return distributions which are characterized by wide tails and excess kurtosis. [For example, see Eberlein, Keller, and Prause (998)]. The socalled jumpdiffusions (which are members of the class where the jumps are compound Poisson processes) offer a compelling explanation for the relatively steep smiles observed in expiring index options like the S&P500. It should be noted that the independent increment assumption is counterfactual in some respects. Nevertheless, because of their successes, flexibility, and analytic tractability, continued financial applications are likely. For a recent survey of applications, in finance and elsewhere, see BarndorffNielsen, Mikosch, and Resnick (00). Jumpdiffusion models are distinguished by their jump amplitude distributions. Two examples are Merton (976) who solved for option prices with lognormally distributed jumps, and Kou (000), who did the same for a double exponential distribution. To obtain an option formula, the authors relied upon particular properties of those distributions. Merton s solution relies upon a product of lognormal variates being lognormally distributed. Kou s derivation stresses the importance of the memoryless property of the exponential distribution. Our results make clear that, in fact, no special properties are needed: we obtain an option formula for any jump distribution. In addition, many of the original results for these models are very complicated. Special functions and complicated expressions are required when option formulas are given in Sspace or stock price space. 3 However, more recently, it has been recognized that option values for both the Lévy process problem and related proportional returns problems are much simpler in Fourier space 4. For example, Carr and Madan (999) have derived relatively simple formulas for call options on Lévy processes, working in Fourier space. Bakshi and Madan (000), although not working directly on Lévy processes, derive an applicable BlackScholesstyle formula for call options using characteristic functions and some more complicated formulas for general claims. Raible
3 (000) obtained an option formula which is very similar to our general result (see below). However, he presents it as a mixture of Fourier and twosided Laplace transforms. Because we use the generalized Fourier transform consistently, our strip condition is more transparent. In Lewis (000), we obtained related inversion formulas for options under stochastic volatility, a proportional returns problem. Here we generate the value of the general claim under a Lévy processes as an integral of Fourier transforms. Once you have our main result, the residue calculus provides a standard approach to variations. For example, we show that the Black Scholes style formula is simply obtained by moving integration contours. The formula can be easily explained with a little background. Assume that under a pricing measure a stock price evolves as ST = S0 exp [ ( r q) T + XT ], where r q is the cost of carry, T is the expiration time for some option, and X T is some Lévy process satisfying E [ exp( X T ) ] =. For Lévy processes, the important role of the characteristic functions φ t( u) = E [ exp( iuxt) ], u R is wellknown. Like all characteristic functions, they are Fourier transforms of a density and typically have an analytic extension (a generalized Fourier transform) u z C, regular in some strip S X parallel to the real zaxis. Somewhat less appreciated, yet key to our approach, is the recognition that option payoff functions also have simple generalized Fourier transforms. Using the variable x = log S T, these transforms are ŵz ( ) = exp( izxwxdx ) ( ), where wx ( ) is the payoff function 5. For example, if x K is a strike price, the call option payoff is wx ( ) = ( e K ) + and so, by a simple integration, iz+ wz ˆ ( ) = K /( z iz), Im z >. Note that if z were real, this regular Fourier transforms would not exist. As shown in Lewis (000), payoff transforms ŵz ( ) for typical claims exist and are regular in their own strips S w in the complex zplane, just like characteristic functions. Then, the initial option value V( S 0 ) is given by simply integrating the (conjugate) product of these two transforms times a phase factor. To do the integration legally, one has to keep z within the intersection of the two strips of regularity S w and S X ( S X is the reflection of S X across the real zaxis). With that synopsis, the formula is rt iν+ izy (.) Option values: V( S ) e 0 = e φ T ( z) wˆ ( z) dz π, iν where Y = ln S0 + ( r q) T, z = u+ iν, z S = S S. V w X Although very compact, (.) contains (as special cases), the BlackScholes model, Merton s jumpdiffusion model, Kou s jumpdiffusion model, and all of the pure jump models that have been introduced. Indeed, it applies to the entire class of exponential Lévy processes which have E [ exp( X T ) ] <. The proof of it and our use of the residue calculus to obtain variations is our primary contribution in this paper.
4 Any pathindependent Europeanstyle payoff, plain vanilla or exotic, may be valued. The expression (.) is obviously just a single integral. It s realvalued and readily evaluated 6. Typically the integrand is a short expression, often with only elementary functions. See Tables. and 3. for examples of φ ( ) and ŵz ( ) respectively. T z iz+ Consider the call option again. Since wz ˆ ( ) = K /( z iz), the integrand in (.) is a regular function of z in the larger strip S X, except for simple poles at z = 0 and z = i. Using the residue calculus, you can move the integration contour around in S X. Of course, you pick up residue contributions if you move contours across (or along!) Im z = 0., We do this and obtain a number of variations on (.) including the BlackScholes style formula that we mentioned earlier. Finally, it turns out that exp( izy ) φt ( z) is the (conjugate of the) Fourier transform of the transition density for log S 0 to reach log S T after the elapse of T. This allows us to interpret (.) simply as a Parseval identity. In fact, the proof of that clarifies what space of payoff functions are handled by our theory and which types are excluded. In the next section, we review some fundamental aspects of Lévy processes, their applications to finance, and their analytic characteristic functions. This material is almost entirely standard and experts in those topics could well skim for our notation and then jump to the proof of (.) in Section 3.. BACKGROUND. The Framework We consider a marketplace in which a stock price or security price S t 0 follows an exponential Lévy process X t (defined below) on a continuoustime probability space ( Ω, F, Q ). We stress that Q is a fixed martingale pricing measure. The pricing measure has the same null sets as an objective or statistical measure P, and the two measures are related by an unspecified Girsanov changeofmeasure transformation 7. However, P plays no direct role in our discussion all expectations and stochastic processes are defined relative to Q. A stock buyer receives a continuous dividend yield q; she could finance her purchase at the riskless rate of interest r. The net financing cost (the cost of carry) is r q. It is convenient to explicitly remove this constant we then investigate option valuation where St = S0 exp [ ( r q) t+ Xt ] under Q, where X t is a Lévy process. Following Sato (999), we adopt the following definition: 3
5 Definition (Lévy Process) An adapted realvalued process X t, with X 0 = 0, is called a Lévy process if: (i) it has independent increments; that is, for any choice of n and 0 t0 < t < < tn, the random variables X t 0, Xt X t,, X 0 t X n tn are independent; (ii) it is timehomogeneous; that is, the distribution of { Xt+ s Xs; t 0 } does not depend upon s. (iii) it is stochastically continuous; that is, for any ε > 0, Pr { Xs+ t Xs > ε} 0 as t 0. (iv) as a function of t, it is rightcontinuous with left limits. Processes that satisfy (i) and (ii) are called processes with stationary (or timehomogeneous) independent increments (PIIS). Some authors (e.g. Bertoin) simply define a Lévy process to be a PIIS process with X 0 = 0. Such processes can be thought of as analogs of random walks in continuous time. To prevent an arbitrage opportunity, the stock price (net of the cost of carry) must be a local martingale under Q. In fact, we maintain throughout the stronger assumption: S t, net of the carry, is a Qmartingale. That is, E [ St ] = S0 exp[( r q) t] or E [exp X t ] =. For those Lévy processes with E [exp X ] <, this normalization can be achieved by a drift adjustment. t Types of Lévy processes. In general, Lévy processes are a combination of a linear drift, a Brownian motion, and a jump process. When jumps occur, X t jumps by Xt = x R \ { 0}, (the notation means that we exclude zero as a possible jump amplitude x). Now consider any closed interval A R that does not contain the origin. Then, the cumulative number of jumps in A the time interval [0,t] with a size that belongs to A, call it N t, is a random variable which is also a measure. This integervalued Qrandom measure is usually written Nt A = ν([ 0, t], A). A With A fixed, then N t has a Poisson distribution with a mean value t Aµ ( x) dx. Here we have introduced the Lévy measure µ ( xdx ), which measures the relative occurrence of different jump amplitudes [see Sato, 00, Theorem.4]. Two types of Lévy processes with a jump component can be distinguished. In type I (the Poisson case), we have R µ ( xdx ) <. Then, we can write µ ( x) = λ f( x), where λ = R µ ( xdx ) is the Poisson intensity (the mean jump arrival rate), and f ( x) dx = df( x), where F( x ) is a cumulative probability distribution 8. We will also call this case the jumpdiffusion case. An example of this type is Merton s (976) jumpdiffusion model, where x is normally distributed: µ ( x) = λf( x) = λexp[ ( x α) / δ]/( πδ) /. 4
6 In the alternative type II case, R µ ( xdx ) = and no overall Poisson intensity can be defined. A + α simple example is the Lévy α stable process: µ ( x) = c± / x, 0< α <, where c ± are two constants for x > 0 and x < 0. Carr and Wu (000) have proposed a special case of this model for stocks. Notice that in the type II example, the source of the divergence is the failure of µ ( x) to be integrable at the origin: there are too many small jumps. The divergence at the origin is always the source of the integrability failure of µ ( x) in type II models the LévyKhintchine representation (see below) guarantees that µ ( x) is always integrable at large x. A general integral representation. One can take a differential of Nt = ν([ 0, t], A), writing dnt = ν( dt, dx) and use these differential random measures in an integration theory [see Jacod and Shiryaev (987)]. With that theory, one can decompose any Lévy process X t into the form 9 : (.) X = ω t + σb + ( xν ( ds, dx) h( x) µ ( x) ds dx ) t h t t 0 R\{ 0} where B t is a QBrownian motion, ωh and σ are constants, and hxis ( ) a truncation function, to be explained. The Brownian motion and the jump process are independent. This representation is unique in the sense that, once the truncation function is fixed, then there is only one set of characteristics { ωh, σ, µ ( x)} for a given { Xt : t 0 }. If the truncation function is changed, the drift ω h changes but the pair { σ, µ ( x)} is invariant. The purpose of the truncation function is to make the integral in (.) exist near the origin, where the integrand must be taken as a whole. +ε Such a function is only necessary in some Type II models where µ ( x) diverges as O( / x ), 0< ε < ; otherwise it may be set to 0. When a truncation function is needed, hxis ( ) required to behave like x near the origin and it is frequently taken to be a bounded function away from the origin. Some popular choices are: (i) h( x) = x { x < } (Sato) ; (ii) hx ( ) = x/( + x ) (Lukacs, Breiman). If R x µ ( x) dx<, then the truncation function need not be bounded and the choice hx ( ) = xmay be convenient. In that special case, we see that (.) is the sum of a linear drift, a Brownian motion, and an independent compensated jumpmartingale.. Analytic Characteristic Functions. As an application of (.), we show that it leads immediately to the celebrated LévyKhintchine representation for the characteristic function φ t ( z). This representation is important to our development because it provides an explicit and simple formula for φ t ( z) for all the Poissontype models and some type II models. First, a definition of φ t ( z) and infinite divisibility, then a remark that we will use later, and then the statement of the theorem. A, 5
7 Definition (Characteristic Function). For z C (z a complex number) and call φ ( z) = E [ exp( izx ) ] the characteristic function of the process X. t t t a < Im z < b, we Remark. Let pt ( x ) be the transition probability density for a Lévy process to reach Xt = x after the elapse of time t. For a < Im z < b, the characteristic function of the process is identical to the characteristic function of this transition density, which is also the generalized Fourier transform of the transition density 0. φ t( z) = F [ pt( x) ] exp( izx) pt( x) dx, a < Im z < b. R Definition (Infinitely Divisible Characteristic Functions). A characteristic function φ t ( z) is said to be infinitely divisible, if for every positive integer n, it is the nth power of some characteristic function. The characteristic function of Lévy processes are infinitely divisible; this is a simple consequence of the PIIS properties. THEOREM (LévyKhintchine Representation). If φ T ( z), a < Im z < b, is an infinitely divisible characteristic function, then it has the representation (.) φt( z) = exp { izωht z σ T + T e ( ) ( ) } izx izh x µ x dx. R where min(, x ) µ ( x) dx < R\{ 0} PROOF: For a proof (when z is real), we refer to Sato (999, Theorem 8.). For an extension to complex z, we refer to Lukacs Theorem below. However, just proceeding formally, it s easy to see how the representation (.) follows from the representation (.). We will only take the simplest case where the deterministic part of the integral in (.) exists on its own. Using that assumption, and the independence of the Brownian motion and the jump process, we have immediately from (.): { ω h µ } E[exp( iz XT)] = exp iz T izt h( x) ( x) ds 0 R \{ } E 0 R\{ 0} T [ exp( izσbt ) ] E exp ( iz xν( dt, dx) ) Now it is wellknown that E [ exp( izσbt ) ] = exp( z σ T ). It is also wellknown that, 6
8 T izxt izx ( iz x ν dt dx ) e { Nt Nt } ( T e µ x dx ) E exp (, ) = E = exp ( ) ( ). 0 R\{ 0} < \{ 0} 0 t R T Combining these results yields (.). The LévyKhintchine representation has the form φ T ( z) = exp [ T Ψ ( z) ], where Ψ ( z) is called the characteristic exponent 3. The normalization φ T ( z = 0) = and the martingale identity φ T ( z = i) = imply that Ψ ( 0) = Ψ ( i) = 0 4. Since, for a sensible stock market model, φ t ( z) must exist at both z = 0 and z = i, it would be helpful if it existed for all z in between. Indeed, all the examples in Table. exist for z within a horizontal strip S X = { z : a < Im z < b}. Here a and b are real numbers, such that b> a. Analyticity in strips is typical, based on this theorem: THEOREM (Lukacs, 970, Theorem 7..): If a characteristic function φ( z) is regular 5 in the neighborhood of z = 0, then it is also regular in a horizontal strip and can be represented in this strip by a Fourier integral. This strip is either the whole zplane, or it has one or two horizontal boundary lines. The purely imaginary points on the boundary of the strip of regularity (if this strip is not the whole plane) are singular points of φ ( z). Remarks. Because of the representation φ t ( z) = exp [ Ψ t ( z) ], singularities of φ t ( z) are singularities of Ψ ( z). Hence, an immediate corollary of Lukacs theorem is that the strips of regularity for the analytic characteristic functions of Lévy processes are timeindependent 6. Clearly, a good Lévy process (good for the purpose of building a stock price model), has an analytic characteristic function regular within a strip: a Im z b, where a, b 0. If a particular Lévy process is a good one, say at t =, then it is a good one for all t. Our option valuation formula only applies to good Lévy processes. Examples. Example of characteristic functions for Lévy processes that have been proposed for the stock market are shown in Table.. [Three entries are adapted from Raible (000)]. For each process, there is a constant drift parameter ω, determined by solving φt ( i) =. We have already mentioned the first two models in the table, both of which have Brownian motion components and are type I or Poisson types. The remaining (pure jump) models are all type II. The third table entry is the Variance Gamma process. The option value was obtained by Madan, Carr, and Chang (998). The process is built up by sampling Brownian motion with drift at random times, time increments which themselves are described by another Lévy process. Clearly, the sampled process is a pure jump process. 7
9 The next table entry is the Normal Inverse Gaussian (NIG) process, another pure jump process applied to stock returns by BarndorffNielsen (998). There are 4 real parameters: ( αβωδ,,, ) where, roughly speaking, α and β are shape parameters (steepness, tail decay), and ω and δ are drift and scale parameters, respectively. [Also see Lillestøl, (998)]. Following is the Generalized Hyperbolic process. This pure jump Lévy process incorporates the VG and NIG process as special cases, as well as another special case just called the hyperbolic process. There are 5 real parameters: ( αβωδλ,,,, ) where the first 4 have a similar interpretation as before and λ is an additional shape parameter. [For surveys, see Bibby and Sørensen (00) and the dissertation of Prause (999)] The last entry is the (maximally) skewed α stable process of Carr and Wu (000). The general α stable Lévy process has four parameters ( αβωσ,,, ), where α ( 0, ] is the index, β [, ] is a skewness, ω R is a drift, and σ 0 is a scale parameter. The transition probability distribution pt( Xt = x) typically has a powerlaw decay as x when α < and so E [exp( X t )] does not exist. However, Carr and Wu have noted that for β =, which they term maximum skewness, then the decay is more rapid, E [exp( X t )] <, and the characteristic function is given by the entry in the table. Note that (unless α = ), the characteristic function has a branch point singularity at z = 0 and we need a branch cut. [The authors estimated α = 6. ±. 0, based upon daily option quotes for S&P500 index option over a year ending in May, 000. They generally suggest that α (, ) for stock prices]. For a stock price model, we want the characteristic function to be regular for at least < Im z < 0. Given this, the natural choice is to place the branch cut along the imaginary zaxis extending upward from z = 0. With that choice, the strip of regularity is Im z < 0 as shown in the table. How are characteristic functions calculated? Many of the Type II models are built up by a subordination of a Brownian motion process and this leads to a determination of their characteristic function from the characteristic function of the driving process. Examples of this type are the Variance Gamma, Normal Inverse Gaussian, and Generalized Hyperbolic models, where the first two are special cases of the last. We refer the reader to the original literature for those calculations. With the Type I models and some Type II models, the LévyKhintchine representation provides the answer. To see that, consider the jumpdiffusion models, which are type I models. We need to relate the representation (.) to the stochastic differential (SDE) that is the usual starting point for these models. For example, both Merton and Kou s jumpdiffusion models may be defined by the SDE 8
10 dst x (.3) = ( r q) dt + σdbt + ( e )[ ν ( dt, dx) µ ( x) dt dx ] S, R t x where µ ( x) integrates ( e ). Under (.3), S t (net of the carry) is clearly a local martingale. For every type I model, µ ( x) = λ f( x). For example, in Kou s double exponential model, f( x ) = exp ( x κ / η) /( η), 0< η <, where κ and η are two real parameters. Starting from (.3), it is straightforward 7 to integrate this general SDE to the exponential form St = S0 exp [ ( r q) t+ Xt ]. The result is again the canonical form (.) with hx ( ) = 0. Given that result, then the LévyKhintchine representation (.) provides the following: (.4) In all Type I models: φ ( ) exp { ( ˆ T z = izωt z σ T + λt f( z) )}, where fˆ( z) = F [ f( x) ], z S f, is the characteristic function of f( x ). The exponentiation of (.3) determines the drift. But we can also get it from the martingale identity φt ( i) = applied to (.4). Both procedures give ω = σ / λ[ fˆ ( i) ]. For izκ example, with Kou s model again, fˆ( z ) = e ( η )/( + z η ), ( / η) < Im z < ( / η). Since 0< η <, the strip of regularity contains < Im z 0 and the model is a good one. This shows how to obtain the second entry in Table.. The first entry is obtained similarly 8. We also mentioned that the LévyKhintchine representation can also be used effectively in some cases of type II models 9. An example is the last entry in Table., which may be calculated + α from µ ( x) = c / x. [See, for example, Breiman (99, Theorem 9.3)]. ± 3. THE OPTION FORMULA As discussed, characteristic functions φ ( z) are typically regular functions in zplane strips. We next show that the same holds true for the transform of typical option payoff functions. Using x = ln S T, let wx ( ) be an option payoff function and let ŵz ( ) = F [ wx ( )], z C be its x generalized Fourier transform. For example, consider the call option payoff, wx ( ) = ( e K ) +, and so by a simple integration exp[( iz + ) x] exp( izx) x= (3.) wz ˆ ( ) = ( K iz + iz ) x= ln K 9
11 The upper limit x = in (3.) does not exist unless Im z >. Applying this restriction, then (3.) is welldefined, in fact, regular in that strip: + iz (3.3) Call option: wz ˆ ( ) = K, Im z > z iz This result is typical: option payoffs have Fourier transforms (w.r.t. log S T ) as long as we admit a complexvalued transform variable. Then, ŵz ( ) exists for Im z restricted to an interval; i.e., z S w, just like a characteristic function. We can go through the same exercise for various standard payoff functions and see what restrictions are necessary for their Fourier transforms to exist. The results are given in Table 3. below. So by introducing generalized transforms, we are able to handle standard payoffs which are unbounded at x = (the call), or constant at x = (the put) and which have no regular Fourier transform. All of the typical payoff functions that one might encounter in practice are handled. But, not every mathematically possible payoff function has a generalized Fourier transform. Definition. We say a function f( x ) is Fourier integrable in a strip if there exists a pair of real numbers a and b, where a < b, such that the generalized Fourier transform fˆ( z) = F [ f( x) ] exists and is regular for z = u+ iv, u R, and ν ( ab, ). Our valuation theorem below will apply to payoff functions which are (i) Fourier integrable in a strip, and (ii) bounded for x < ( S 0, ). Let us discuss these two requirements in turn. From the definition above, property (i) means that the payoff functions have no worse than exponential growth in x, as x. That is, there exist an ( ab, ) such that wx ( )exp( ν x) 0 as x for every ν ( ab, ). Equivalently, as x +, we have wx ( )exp[ ( a+ ε) x] 0 for every ε > 0. Similarly, as x, we have wx ( )exp[ ( b ε) x] 0 for every ε > 0. For example, for a call option with strike K, the x x requirement is that ( e K) + e ν 0, as x +. This condition again implies that ν (, ), as we found before. Similarly, for the put option, the requirement is that x x ( K e ) + e ν 0, as x. This condition implies that ν (, 0 ). Note that exponential growth in x means power law behavior in S T as ST 0,. Property (ii) arises from a technical requirement (see below) that wx ( )exp( νx) be bounded. We already know this term is bounded at ± (since it s zero). To keep wx ( )exp( ν x) bounded everywhere, we also need wx ( ) bounded for x <. This is a very mild restriction, in the sense that it only excludes payoff functions that would be unlikely to be offered in the 0
12 / / marketplace. For example, consider a payoff that behaves like x x0 = log( S/ K) as S K, where 0 < K <. While this payoff is integrable with respect to x near x = x 0, it s not bounded and so excluded. In practice, such a payoff would be a pretty dangerous offering for the seller. Generalized Fourier transforms are inverted by integrating along a straight line in the complex z plane, parallel to the real axis, with z within the strip of regularity. 0 For example, fixing ν = Im z, then the payoff functions are given by: iν+ izx wx ( ) = e wzdz ˆ ( ) π iν, z S w. If f( x ) is a complexvalued function of a real variable x, then by f L, we mean that f( x) dx<, where f is the modulus of f. With that notation, we need the following Parsevalstyle identity adapted from Titchmarsh (975), and using our ( π) normalization: THEOREM 3. (Titchmarsh, Theorem 39): Let both f( x), g( x) L and one of them is bounded. Assume that f ( x y) g( x) dx is continuous at y = 0. In addition, assume that, with u R, the Fourier transforms fˆ( u) = F [ f( x) ] and ĝu ( ) = F [ gx ( )] exist. Then, (3.4) ˆ = f ( x) g( x) dx f ( u) gˆ ( u) du. π We need a notation for a reflected strip. If ν ( ab, ) and u is any real number, then S consists of all z = u+ iν and S consists of all z = u iν. THEOREM 3.. (Option Valuation). Let V( S 0 ) be the current price of a Europeanstyle option with a payoff function wx ( ) 0, where x = log S T. Assume that w( x ) is Fourier integrable in a strip and bounded for x <, with transform ŵz, ( ) z S w. Let St = S0 exp [ ( r q) t+ Xt ], where X t is a Lévy process and exp[ X t ] is a martingale. Assume that X T has the analytic characteristic function φ T( z), regular in the strip S X = { z = u+ iν : ν ( a, b)}, where a < and b > 0. Then, if SV Sw S X is not empty, the option value is given by rt iν+ (3.5) ( ) e izy V S0 = e φ T ( z) wˆ ( z) dz π, where ν = Im z, z SV = Sw S X, iν and Y = ln S0 + ( r q) T. Moreover, SV is not empty when the payoff is a call or put option.
13 PROOF: From martingale pricing, since the payoff function is w(ln S T ), then rt i rt (3.6) V( S0) = e E [ w(ln S T )] e ν+ iz S = E T wˆ ( z) dz π, ν = Im z, z Sw iν rt i e ν+ = E exp{ iz[ ln S + ( r q) T ]} exp( izxt ) wˆ ( z) dz π 0. iν In the first line we just inserted the transform representation for w(ln S T ). In the second line, we inserted ST = S0 exp [( r q) T + XT ]. Next, we bring the expectation inside the integral, which requires an exchange of integration order. This exchange is just made formally here; we validate it by Theorem (3.4) below, an alternative proof of (3.5). Certainly a necessary condition for the exchange to be valid is that E [ exp( izx τ ) ] = φt ( z ) exists. Now φt ( z) exists if z S X, but z is already restricted to z S w. So the whole integrand exists and is regular if z SV = Sw S X. Substituting Y = ln S0 + ( r q) T, we have (3.5). Now S X = { u+ iν : ν ( α, β)}, where α < 0 and β >. So S X intersects both Im z < 0 and Im z >, which shows that S is not empty for puts or calls V Next, an alternative proof will show that (3.5) is a consequence of Theorem 3.. To accomplish that, first let s0 = ln S0 and st = ln ST and consider the distribution function for the logstock price to reach a terminal value after the elapse of T. Define both the distribution function and its density with x T 0 T 0 T 0. Q ( x, s ) Pr{ s x s } q ( ξ, s ) dξ = < = LEMMA 3.3. Equation (3.5) is true if the following two integrals are equal: (3.7) qt( xt, s ) w( xt) dxt = 0 qˆt( u iν, s ) wˆ( u+ iν) du π 0, u+ iν w X S S. PROOF: Recall from the definition that φt( z) = R exp( izx) pt( x) dx, where pt ( x ) is the transition density for the Lévy process. Introduce a distribution function for that: x T T T P ( x) = Pr{ X < x} = p ( ξ) dξ. Now Pr{ s < x s } = Pr{ s + ( r q) T + X < x s } = Pr{ X < x Y}, T 0 0 T 0 T recalling that Y = ln S0 + ( r q) T. In other words, QT( x, s0 ) = PT( x Y) and so by differentiating w.r.t. x, we have qt( x, s0 ) = pt( x Y). By taking the Fourier transform of both sides of this last identity, we have qˆt( z, s0 ) = pˆt( z)exp( izy) for z in some strip, call it S q. But,
14 of course, pˆt ( z) φ T ( z), so φ T( z)exp( izy) = qˆ T( z, s0 ) and the strip is S q = S X. Taking z z, we have φt( z) exp( izy) = qˆ T( z, s 0 ), where z S X. Now the first expression on the righthandside of (3.6) may also be written as the (discounted) integral of the transition density and the payoff function. This shows that (3.5) is equivalent to the statement: rt iν+ rt V ( S ) (, ) ( ) e 0 = e qt xt s w xt dxt qˆt( z, s ) wˆ( z) dz 0 = π iν 0, Letting z = u+ iν in this last equation shows that (3.5) is true if (3.7) is true. w X z S S. THEOREM 3.4 Under the assumptions of Theorem 3., equation (3.7) is true; hence, so is (3.5) PROOF: Let u be real. Also, let ν 0 be any fixed real number, such that u+ iν0 Sw S X. Also define f( x) = qt ( x, s0) exp( ν0 x) and gx ( ) = wx ( )exp( ν 0 x), where s 0 is fixed and need not be displayed. Note that if z = u+ iv 0, then q (, ) exp( ) (, ) ˆ ˆT z s0 = iux+ v0x qt x s0 dx = f ( u) and wz ˆ( ) = exp( iux vxwxdx 0 ) ( ) = gu ˆ( ). Thus, proving (3.7) valid is equivalent to proving that, regardless of the choice for ν 0 : (3.8) ˆ f ( x) g( x) dx = f ( u) gˆ ( u) du π, u+ iν0 S S We showed above that qt ( x, s 0 ) is Fourier integrable in S X. That is, qt ( x, s 0 )exp( izx) dx = qt ( x, s )exp( iux νx ) 0 dx exists for all z = u+ iν S X. In particular, choose u = 0 and ν = ν 0. Obviously any real part is a valid choice. And ν = ν 0 is a valid choice because if ν 0 is the imaginary part of some number in S X (which it is), then ν 0 is the imaginary part of some number in S X. With that choice, we have shown that qt ( x, s0 )exp( ν 0 x) dx = f( x) dxexists. Since f( x ) is a nonnegative real, then f ( x) dx = f ( x) dx< ; i.e., f( x) L. Similarly, both wx ( ) and exp( νx) are real and nonnegative. Since wx ( ) is Fourier integrable in the strip z = u+ iν S w, then wx ( )exp( iux νxdx ) <. Taking u = 0 and ν = ν 0 is a valid choice here (note that ν 0 is also the imaginary part of some number in S w ). So, we have shown that gx ( ) L. In addition, under the assumptions of Theorem 3., wx ( ) is bounded for x <. Hence gx ( ) is bounded. We have shown that the requirements of Theorem (3.) are met and so (3.8), (3.7), and (3.5) are all proven. We note again that Raible (000) obtained an integral very similar to (3.5), but he presents it as a mixture of Fourier and twosided Laplace transforms. Because we use the generalized Fourier transform consistently, our strip condition seems to us much more transparent. w X 3
15 Contour variations. The general formula (3.5), with S w taken from Table 3., provides a starting point formula that has many variations. The variations are obtained by the use of the residue calculus. We stress that we maintain the assumptions of the theorem, which means that S X = { z : α Im z β }, where α < 0 and β >. We illustrate with the call option. Then, using the Table 3. entries, we see that call option price CSKT (,, ) is given by rt iν + izk (3.9) CSKT (,, ) = Ke e φ T ( z) dz π, ν iν z (, β) iz using S ( ) k = log + ( r q) T. K Since β >, the open interval (, β) is not empty and the integral exists. The phase factor uses the dimensionless moneyness k, which is also a natural moneyness measure for the implied volatility smile. With that variable, atthemoney means that the forward stock price (the price for delivery at expiration) is equal to the strike. X The integrand in (3.9) is regular throughout S, except for simple poles at z = 0 and z = i. rt qt The pole at z = 0 has a residue Ke i /( π) and the pole at z = i has a residue Se i /( π). Let s move the integration contour to ν ( 0, ) ; then by the residue theorem, the call option value must also equal the integral along Im z = ν minus πi times the residue at z = i. That gives us a first alternative formula rt iν + qt (3.0) (,, ) Ke izk CSKT = Se e φ T ( z) dz π iν z iz, ν ( 0, ) This is actually our preferred integration formula for the call option. For example, with ν = /, which is symmetrically located between the two poles, this last formula becomes (3.) qt ( r q) T / iuk i φt 0 + C( S, K, T ) = Se SKe Re e ( u ) du π u + Next, we move the contour from (3.9) to ν3 ( α, 0 ). Then you pick up both poles. Moreover, the integral along Im z = ν 3 is also the put option formula PSKT (,, ), since Im z < 0 (see qt rt Table 3.). The net result is simply the put/call parity relation, C = P+ Se Ke, which is our second alternative formula. Finally, we can move the contours to exactly Im z = and Im z = 0. Then the integrals become principal value integrals and you pick up onehalf of the residues. For example, start with the integral in (3.9) written in the form 4. 4
16 rt iν + izk iν Ke e φ i i T z dz = I+ I π z z i Now move I to exactly Im z = 0 ; the residue theorem combined with letting z ( )( ) rt rt iuk ( π ) Ke i Ke φ T ( i )( ) I = i + e u du P π π, u = u yields where P denotes the Cauchy principle value and we have taken u = z. Similarly, move I to exactly Im z = ; the residue theorem yields ( ) Se qt i Ke rt i+ izk π φ T ( )( i ) P. i I = i + e z dz π π z i Now let z = u+ i, and we have qt qt iuk I ( πi) Se i Se e φ T ( u i i = )( ) du P π π. u The integrals are real and may be simplified by taking the real part. Putting the results together yields the call option price in the BlackScholes form: qt rt (3.) CSKT (,, ) = Se Π Ke Π, where Π = + π iuk e φ ( ) Re T u i du, iu 0 Π = + π iuk e φ ( ) Re T u du. iu qt The first term e Π = C/ S is also the delta. The second term Π = Pr ( ST > K). These integrands are integrable as u 0 because φ ( u) is an analytic characteristic function in a neighborhood of u = 0 and u = i. For example, near u = 0, φ( u) + uφ ( 0 ), where φ ( 0 ) < because of analyticity 3. Hence, the integrand in Π tends to Re ( i/ u iφ ( 0) + k) = Im φ ( 0 ) + k as u 0, which is finite. Because of the martingale identity φ( i) =, the Π integrand is also finite as u 0. For numerical work (3.) is more efficient: in the BlackScholes form (3.) not only are there two integrations, but the integrand falls off more slowly then (3.) by a factor of u. As we have shown, the residue calculus provides a general mechanism for obtaining a number of variation on the basic formula, most of which have been obtained before. For example, (3.9) was derived by Carr and Madan (999) in a specialized attack on the call option. The BlackScholes form (3.) was obtained in a more general setting by Bakshi and Madan (000). A formula of the same style as (3.0) was obtained by Lewis (000) in a stochastic volatility setting. 0 5
17 4. CONCLUSIONS The generalization of the BlackScholes theory to the martingale pricing theory began a competition in mathematical finance between the PDE approach and the probabilistic approach to solving certain problems. For the simple ones, it s a tie because both methods usually work in a few steps. But for some complicated problems, one method seems to win out 4. For option valuation under general Lévy processes, the probabilistic approach, in my opinion, is the clear victor. One can introduce PDEs, but to get to the same results is a long trek around I know this because, in fact, I originally obtained a version of (3.5) from a PDE. 6
18 Table. Characteristic Functions for Lévy Processes in Stock Price Models Lévy Process Characteristic Function: φ (z) = E [ exp( iz X )] Lognormal Jump iz z / diffusion exp{ iz T z T T ( e α δ ω σ + λ )} Double Exponential Jumpdiffusion iz exp η κ izωt z σ T λt + e + z η T T Strip of Regularity S X Entire zplane < Im z <, η η 0< η < Variance Gamma Normal Inverse exp T / ν Im z ( izωt )( izνθ+ σ νz ) Gaussian exp { izωt δt + α β α ( β+ iz) } β α< < β+ α (see notes) β α< Im z < β+ α Generalized Hyperbolic ( ) λt / ( ) Kλ δ α ( β iz) α β + exp( izωt ) α ( β+ iz) Kλ ( δ α β ) T β α< Im z < β+ α Finite Moment Logstable exp { izωt ( izσ) α T sec πα } Im z < 0 Notes: The stock price evolution is ST = S0 exp [ ( r q) T + XT ], where r is the interest rate, q is the dividend yield, and X T is a Lévy process. For the Variance Gamma model, the strip of 4 / regularity uses α = [ /( νσ ) + ( θ / σ )], β = θ/ σ. For each model, the drift parameter ω is determined by φt ( i) =. For the Variance Gamma, Normal Inverse Gaussian, and Generalized Hyperbolic models, we need α+ β 0 and β α for a good stock market model. 7
19 Table 3. Generalized Fourier Transforms for Various Financial Claims Financial Claim (Option) Payoff Function: wx ( ) Payoff Transform: ŵz ( ) = F[ wx ( )] Strip of regularity S w Call option x ( ) e K + K iz + z iz Im z > Put option Covered call or cashsecured put ( K e x ) + x ( ) K iz + z iz + min e, K iz K z iz Im z < 0 0< Im z < Delta function δ( x ln K) iz K Entire zplane Money market πδ( z) Im z = 0 Notes: The table uses x = log S T, where S T is the security price at expiration, and x + = max( x, 0 ). The parameter K is a strike (exercise) price. The expression δ ( x x ) 0 is the Dirac delta function. The symbol F [ i] indicates taking a Fourier transform. 8
20 References Aase, Knut K.(988): Contingent Claims Valuation when the Security Price is a Combination of an Ito Process and a Random Point Process, Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 8, Bakshi, Gurdip and Dilip Madan (000): Spanning and Derivativesecurity Valuation, J. of Financial Economics, 55, BarndorffNielsen, O.E., T Mikosch, and S. I. Resnick, eds (00): Levy Processes: Theory and Applications, Birkhäuser, Boston. BarndorffNielsen, O.E (998): Processes of Normal Inverse Gaussian Type, Finance and Stochastics,, Bates, David S. (988): Pricing options on jumpdiffusion processes. Working paper 3788, Univ. of Pennsylvania, Rodney L. White Center. Bates, David S. (99): The Crash of 87: Was it Expected? The Evidence from Options Markets, J. Finance 46, July, Bertoin, Jean (996): Lévy Processes, Cambridge University Press. Bibby, Bo Martin and Michael Sørensen (00): Hyperbolic Processes in Finance, manuscript, Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Univ. of Copenhagen. Breiman, Leo (99), Probability, SIAM, Philadelphia. Bremaud, Pierre (974): The Martingale Theory of Point Processes over the Real Half Line Admitting an Intensity. Control Theory, Numerical Methods and Computer System Modelling. Series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 07, SpringerVerlag, Berlin, Carr, Peter and Dilip B. Madan (999): Option Valuation using the Fast Fourier Transform, J. Computational Finance,, No.4, Summer,
The Center for Applied Probability Columbia University: Nov. 9, th Annual CAP Workshop on Derivative Securities and Risk Management
The Center for Applied Probability Columbia University: Nov. 9 00 8 th Annual CAP Workshop on Derivative Securities and Risk Management A Simple Option Formula for General JumpDiffusion and other Exponential
More informationPricing options with VG model using FFT
Pricing options with VG model using FFT Andrey Itkin itkin@chem.ucla.edu Moscow State Aviation University Department of applied mathematics and physics A.Itkin Pricing options with VG model using FFT.
More informationOption Pricing Formulae using Fourier Transform: Theory and Application
Option Pricing Formulae using Fourier Transform: Theory and Application Martin Schmelzle * April 2010 Abstract Fourier transform techniques are playing an increasingly important role in Mathematical Finance.
More informationMathematical Finance
Mathematical Finance Option Pricing under the RiskNeutral Measure Cory Barnes Department of Mathematics University of Washington June 11, 2013 Outline 1 Probability Background 2 Black Scholes for European
More informationThe BlackScholes Formula
FIN40008 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS SPRING 2008 The BlackScholes Formula These notes examine the BlackScholes formula for European options. The BlackScholes formula are complex as they are based on the
More informationThe BlackScholes Model
The BlackScholes Model Liuren Wu Zicklin School of Business, Baruch College Options Markets (Hull chapter: 12, 13, 14) Liuren Wu The BlackScholes Model Options Markets 1 / 19 The BlackScholesMerton
More informationOn BlackScholes Equation, Black Scholes Formula and Binary Option Price
On BlackScholes Equation, Black Scholes Formula and Binary Option Price Abstract: Chi Gao 12/15/2013 I. BlackScholes Equation is derived using two methods: (1) riskneutral measure; (2)  hedge. II.
More informationA spot price model feasible for electricity forward pricing Part II
A spot price model feasible for electricity forward pricing Part II Fred Espen Benth Centre of Mathematics for Applications (CMA) University of Oslo, Norway Wolfgang Pauli Institute, Wien January 1718
More informationReview of Basic Options Concepts and Terminology
Review of Basic Options Concepts and Terminology March 24, 2005 1 Introduction The purchase of an options contract gives the buyer the right to buy call options contract or sell put options contract some
More informationDoes BlackScholes framework for Option Pricing use Constant Volatilities and Interest Rates? New Solution for a New Problem
Does BlackScholes framework for Option Pricing use Constant Volatilities and Interest Rates? New Solution for a New Problem Gagan Deep Singh Assistant Vice President Genpact Smart Decision Services Financial
More informationLECTURE 15: AMERICAN OPTIONS
LECTURE 15: AMERICAN OPTIONS 1. Introduction All of the options that we have considered thus far have been of the European variety: exercise is permitted only at the termination of the contract. These
More informationARBITRAGEFREE OPTION PRICING MODELS. Denis Bell. University of North Florida
ARBITRAGEFREE OPTION PRICING MODELS Denis Bell University of North Florida Modelling Stock Prices Example American Express In mathematical finance, it is customary to model a stock price by an (Ito) stochatic
More informationLecture 12: The BlackScholes Model Steven Skiena. http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/ skiena
Lecture 12: The BlackScholes Model Steven Skiena Department of Computer Science State University of New York Stony Brook, NY 11794 4400 http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/ skiena The BlackScholesMerton Model
More informationAlternative Price Processes for BlackScholes: Empirical Evidence and Theory
Alternative Price Processes for BlackScholes: Empirical Evidence and Theory Samuel W. Malone April 19, 2002 This work is supported by NSF VIGRE grant number DMS9983320. Page 1 of 44 1 Introduction This
More informationPricing Barrier Options under Local Volatility
Abstract Pricing Barrier Options under Local Volatility Artur Sepp Mail: artursepp@hotmail.com, Web: www.hot.ee/seppar 16 November 2002 We study pricing under the local volatility. Our research is mainly
More informationMonte Carlo Methods in Finance
Author: Yiyang Yang Advisor: Pr. Xiaolin Li, Pr. Zari Rachev Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics State University of New York at Stony Brook October 2, 2012 Outline Introduction 1 Introduction
More informationCS 522 Computational Tools and Methods in Finance Robert Jarrow Lecture 1: Equity Options
CS 5 Computational Tools and Methods in Finance Robert Jarrow Lecture 1: Equity Options 1. Definitions Equity. The common stock of a corporation. Traded on organized exchanges (NYSE, AMEX, NASDAQ). A common
More informationValuing Stock Options: The BlackScholesMerton Model. Chapter 13
Valuing Stock Options: The BlackScholesMerton Model Chapter 13 Fundamentals of Futures and Options Markets, 8th Ed, Ch 13, Copyright John C. Hull 2013 1 The BlackScholesMerton Random Walk Assumption
More informationQUANTIZED INTEREST RATE AT THE MONEY FOR AMERICAN OPTIONS
QUANTIZED INTEREST RATE AT THE MONEY FOR AMERICAN OPTIONS L. M. Dieng ( Department of Physics, CUNY/BCC, New York, New York) Abstract: In this work, we expand the idea of Samuelson[3] and Shepp[,5,6] for
More informationLecture Note of Bus 41202, Spring 2012: Stochastic Diffusion & Option Pricing
Lecture Note of Bus 41202, Spring 2012: Stochastic Diffusion & Option Pricing Key concept: Ito s lemma Stock Options: A contract giving its holder the right, but not obligation, to trade shares of a common
More informationModeling the Implied Volatility Surface. Jim Gatheral Stanford Financial Mathematics Seminar February 28, 2003
Modeling the Implied Volatility Surface Jim Gatheral Stanford Financial Mathematics Seminar February 28, 2003 This presentation represents only the personal opinions of the author and not those of Merrill
More informationOption pricing. Vinod Kothari
Option pricing Vinod Kothari Notation we use this Chapter will be as follows: S o : Price of the share at time 0 S T : Price of the share at time T T : time to maturity of the option r : risk free rate
More informationLecture 4: The BlackScholes model
OPTIONS and FUTURES Lecture 4: The BlackScholes model Philip H. Dybvig Washington University in Saint Louis BlackScholes option pricing model Lognormal price process Call price Put price Using BlackScholes
More information第 9 讲 : 股 票 期 权 定 价 : BS 模 型 Valuing Stock Options: The BlackScholes Model
1 第 9 讲 : 股 票 期 权 定 价 : BS 模 型 Valuing Stock Options: The BlackScholes Model Outline 有 关 股 价 的 假 设 The BS Model 隐 性 波 动 性 Implied Volatility 红 利 与 期 权 定 价 Dividends and Option Pricing 美 式 期 权 定 价 American
More informationBlackScholes Equation for Option Pricing
BlackScholes Equation for Option Pricing By Ivan Karmazin, Jiacong Li 1. Introduction In early 1970s, Black, Scholes and Merton achieved a major breakthrough in pricing of European stock options and there
More informationMoreover, under the risk neutral measure, it must be the case that (5) r t = µ t.
LECTURE 7: BLACK SCHOLES THEORY 1. Introduction: The Black Scholes Model In 1973 Fisher Black and Myron Scholes ushered in the modern era of derivative securities with a seminal paper 1 on the pricing
More informationEuropean Options Pricing Using Monte Carlo Simulation
European Options Pricing Using Monte Carlo Simulation Alexandros Kyrtsos Division of Materials Science and Engineering, Boston University akyrtsos@bu.edu European options can be priced using the analytical
More informationA Novel Fourier Transform Bspline Method for Option Pricing*
A Novel Fourier Transform Bspline Method for Option Pricing* Paper available from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2269370 Gareth G. Haslip, FIA PhD Cass Business School, City University London October
More informationBINOMIAL OPTIONS PRICING MODEL. Mark Ioffe. Abstract
BINOMIAL OPTIONS PRICING MODEL Mark Ioffe Abstract Binomial option pricing model is a widespread numerical method of calculating price of American options. In terms of applied mathematics this is simple
More informationInvesco Great Wall Fund Management Co. Shenzhen: June 14, 2008
: A Stern School of Business New York University Invesco Great Wall Fund Management Co. Shenzhen: June 14, 2008 Outline 1 2 3 4 5 6 se notes review the principles underlying option pricing and some of
More informationA new FeynmanKacformula for option pricing in Lévy models
A new FeynmanKacformula for option pricing in Lévy models Kathrin Glau Department of Mathematical Stochastics, Universtity of Freiburg (Joint work with E. Eberlein) 6th World Congress of the Bachelier
More informationLOGTYPE MODELS, HOMOGENEITY OF OPTION PRICES AND CONVEXITY. 1. Introduction
LOGTYPE MODELS, HOMOGENEITY OF OPTION PRICES AND CONVEXITY M. S. JOSHI Abstract. It is shown that the properties of convexity of call prices with respect to spot price and homogeneity of call prices as
More informationLOGNORMAL MODEL FOR STOCK PRICES
LOGNORMAL MODEL FOR STOCK PRICES MICHAEL J. SHARPE MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT, UCSD 1. INTRODUCTION What follows is a simple but important model that will be the basis for a later study of stock prices as
More informationFINANCIAL ECONOMICS OPTION PRICING
OPTION PRICING Options are contingency contracts that specify payoffs if stock prices reach specified levels. A call option is the right to buy a stock at a specified price, X, called the strike price.
More informationAnalytically Tractable Stochastic Stock Price Models
Archil Gulisashvili Analytically Tractable Stochastic Stock Price Models 4Q Springer Contents 1 Volatility Processes 1 1.1 Brownian Motion 1 1.2 s Geometric Brownian Motion 6 1.3 LongTime Behavior of
More informationStocks paying discrete dividends: modelling and option pricing
Stocks paying discrete dividends: modelling and option pricing Ralf Korn 1 and L. C. G. Rogers 2 Abstract In the BlackScholes model, any dividends on stocks are paid continuously, but in reality dividends
More informationAn Introduction to Modeling Stock Price Returns With a View Towards Option Pricing
An Introduction to Modeling Stock Price Returns With a View Towards Option Pricing Kyle Chauvin August 21, 2006 This work is the product of a summer research project at the University of Kansas, conducted
More informationOn exponentially ane martingales. Johannes MuhleKarbe
On exponentially ane martingales AMAMEF 2007, Bedlewo Johannes MuhleKarbe Joint work with Jan Kallsen HVBInstitut für Finanzmathematik, Technische Universität München 1 Outline 1. Semimartingale characteristics
More informationStephane Crepey. Financial Modeling. A Backward Stochastic Differential Equations Perspective. 4y Springer
Stephane Crepey Financial Modeling A Backward Stochastic Differential Equations Perspective 4y Springer Part I An Introductory Course in Stochastic Processes 1 Some Classes of DiscreteTime Stochastic
More informationAsian Option Pricing Formula for Uncertain Financial Market
Sun and Chen Journal of Uncertainty Analysis and Applications (215) 3:11 DOI 1.1186/s446715357 RESEARCH Open Access Asian Option Pricing Formula for Uncertain Financial Market Jiajun Sun 1 and Xiaowei
More informationJungSoon Hyun and YoungHee Kim
J. Korean Math. Soc. 43 (2006), No. 4, pp. 845 858 TWO APPROACHES FOR STOCHASTIC INTEREST RATE OPTION MODEL JungSoon Hyun and YoungHee Kim Abstract. We present two approaches of the stochastic interest
More informationLecture 1: Stochastic Volatility and Local Volatility
Lecture 1: Stochastic Volatility and Local Volatility Jim Gatheral, Merrill Lynch Case Studies in Financial Modelling Course Notes, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Fall Term, 2002 Abstract
More informationFrom Binomial Trees to the BlackScholes Option Pricing Formulas
Lecture 4 From Binomial Trees to the BlackScholes Option Pricing Formulas In this lecture, we will extend the example in Lecture 2 to a general setting of binomial trees, as an important model for a single
More informationLECTURES ON REAL OPTIONS: PART II TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
LECTURES ON REAL OPTIONS: PART II TECHNICAL ANALYSIS Robert S. Pindyck Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02142 Robert Pindyck (MIT) LECTURES ON REAL OPTIONS PART II August, 2008 1 / 50
More informationLecture. S t = S t δ[s t ].
Lecture In real life the vast majority of all traded options are written on stocks having at least one dividend left before the date of expiration of the option. Thus the study of dividends is important
More informationThe BlackScholes pricing formulas
The BlackScholes pricing formulas Moty Katzman September 19, 2014 The BlackScholes differential equation Aim: Find a formula for the price of European options on stock. Lemma 6.1: Assume that a stock
More informationLecture Notes: Basic Concepts in Option Pricing  The Black and Scholes Model
Brunel University Msc., EC5504, Financial Engineering Prof Menelaos Karanasos Lecture Notes: Basic Concepts in Option Pricing  The Black and Scholes Model Recall that the price of an option is equal to
More informationA nongaussian OrnsteinUhlenbeck process for electricity spot price modeling and derivatives pricing
A nongaussian OrnsteinUhlenbeck process for electricity spot price modeling and derivatives pricing Thilo MeyerBrandis Center of Mathematics for Applications / University of Oslo Based on joint work
More informationComputational Finance Options
1 Options 1 1 Options Computational Finance Options An option gives the holder of the option the right, but not the obligation to do something. Conversely, if you sell an option, you may be obliged to
More informationA SNOWBALL CURRENCY OPTION
J. KSIAM Vol.15, No.1, 31 41, 011 A SNOWBALL CURRENCY OPTION GYOOCHEOL SHIM 1 1 GRADUATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL ENGINEERING, AJOU UNIVERSITY, SOUTH KOREA Email address: gshim@ajou.ac.kr ABSTRACT. I introduce
More informationMonte Carlo Methods and Models in Finance and Insurance
Chapman & Hall/CRC FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS SERIES Monte Carlo Methods and Models in Finance and Insurance Ralf Korn Elke Korn Gerald Kroisandt f r oc) CRC Press \ V^ J Taylor & Francis Croup ^^"^ Boca Raton
More informationMath 526: Brownian Motion Notes
Math 526: Brownian Motion Notes Definition. Mike Ludkovski, 27, all rights reserved. A stochastic process (X t ) is called Brownian motion if:. The map t X t (ω) is continuous for every ω. 2. (X t X t
More informationHydrodynamic Limits of Randomized Load Balancing Networks
Hydrodynamic Limits of Randomized Load Balancing Networks Kavita Ramanan and Mohammadreza Aghajani Brown University Stochastic Networks and Stochastic Geometry a conference in honour of François Baccelli
More informationMertonBlackScholes model for option pricing. Peter Denteneer. 22 oktober 2009
MertonBlackScholes model for option pricing Instituut{Lorentz voor Theoretische Natuurkunde, LION, Universiteit Leiden 22 oktober 2009 With inspiration from: J. Tinbergen, T.C. Koopmans, E. Majorana,
More informationτ θ What is the proper price at time t =0of this option?
Now by Itô s formula But Mu f and u g in Ū. Hence τ θ u(x) =E( Mu(X) ds + u(x(τ θ))) 0 τ θ u(x) E( f(x) ds + g(x(τ θ))) = J x (θ). 0 But since u(x) =J x (θ ), we consequently have u(x) =J x (θ ) = min
More informationProbability and Statistics
CHAPTER 2: RANDOM VARIABLES AND ASSOCIATED FUNCTIONS 2b  0 Probability and Statistics Kristel Van Steen, PhD 2 Montefiore Institute  Systems and Modeling GIGA  Bioinformatics ULg kristel.vansteen@ulg.ac.be
More informationHedging Illiquid FX Options: An Empirical Analysis of Alternative Hedging Strategies
Hedging Illiquid FX Options: An Empirical Analysis of Alternative Hedging Strategies Drazen Pesjak Supervised by A.A. Tsvetkov 1, D. Posthuma 2 and S.A. Borovkova 3 MSc. Thesis Finance HONOURS TRACK Quantitative
More informationNotes on BlackScholes Option Pricing Formula
. Notes on BlackScholes Option Pricing Formula by DeXing Guan March 2006 These notes are a brief introduction to the BlackScholes formula, which prices the European call options. The essential reading
More informationA Coefficient of Variation for Skewed and HeavyTailed Insurance Losses. Michael R. Powers[ 1 ] Temple University and Tsinghua University
A Coefficient of Variation for Skewed and HeavyTailed Insurance Losses Michael R. Powers[ ] Temple University and Tsinghua University Thomas Y. Powers Yale University [June 2009] Abstract We propose a
More informationThe Behavior of Bonds and Interest Rates. An Impossible Bond Pricing Model. 780 w Interest Rate Models
780 w Interest Rate Models The Behavior of Bonds and Interest Rates Before discussing how a bond marketmaker would deltahedge, we first need to specify how bonds behave. Suppose we try to model a zerocoupon
More informationMaster of Mathematical Finance: Course Descriptions
Master of Mathematical Finance: Course Descriptions CS 522 Data Mining Computer Science This course provides continued exploration of data mining algorithms. More sophisticated algorithms such as support
More informationTHE BLACKSCHOLES MODEL AND EXTENSIONS
THE BLACSCHOLES MODEL AND EXTENSIONS EVAN TURNER Abstract. This paper will derive the BlackScholes pricing model of a European option by calculating the expected value of the option. We will assume that
More informationJournal of Financial and Economic Practice
Analyzing Investment Data Using Conditional Probabilities: The Implications for Investment Forecasts, Stock Option Pricing, Risk Premia, and CAPM Beta Calculations By Richard R. Joss, Ph.D. Resource Actuary,
More informationPricing of an Exotic Forward Contract
Pricing of an Exotic Forward Contract Jirô Akahori, Yuji Hishida and Maho Nishida Dept. of Mathematical Sciences, Ritsumeikan University 111 Nojihigashi, Kusatsu, Shiga 5258577, Japan Email: {akahori,
More information4. Complex integration: Cauchy integral theorem and Cauchy integral formulas. Definite integral of a complexvalued function of a real variable
4. Complex integration: Cauchy integral theorem and Cauchy integral formulas Definite integral of a complexvalued function of a real variable Consider a complex valued function f(t) of a real variable
More informationFinite Differences Schemes for Pricing of European and American Options
Finite Differences Schemes for Pricing of European and American Options Margarida Mirador Fernandes IST Technical University of Lisbon Lisbon, Portugal November 009 Abstract Starting with the BlackScholes
More informationThe BlackScholesMerton Approach to Pricing Options
he BlackScholesMerton Approach to Pricing Options Paul J Atzberger Comments should be sent to: atzberg@mathucsbedu Introduction In this article we shall discuss the BlackScholesMerton approach to determining
More informationNew Pricing Formula for Arithmetic Asian Options. Using PDE Approach
Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 5, 0, no. 77, 3803809 New Pricing Formula for Arithmetic Asian Options Using PDE Approach Zieneb Ali Elshegmani, Rokiah Rozita Ahmad and 3 Roza Hazli Zakaria, School
More informationUnderstanding N(d 1 ) and N(d 2 ): RiskAdjusted Probabilities in the BlackScholes Model 1
Understanding N(d 1 ) and N(d 2 ): RiskAdjusted Probabilities in the BlackScholes Model 1 Lars Tyge Nielsen INSEAD Boulevard de Constance 77305 Fontainebleau Cedex France Email: nielsen@freiba51 October
More informationSome stability results of parameter identification in a jump diffusion model
Some stability results of parameter identification in a jump diffusion model D. Düvelmeyer Technische Universität Chemnitz, Fakultät für Mathematik, 09107 Chemnitz, Germany Abstract In this paper we discuss
More informationBias in the Estimation of Mean Reversion in ContinuousTime Lévy Processes
Bias in the Estimation of Mean Reversion in ContinuousTime Lévy Processes Yong Bao a, Aman Ullah b, Yun Wang c, and Jun Yu d a Purdue University, IN, USA b University of California, Riverside, CA, USA
More informationConsistent Pricing of FX Options
Consistent Pricing of FX Options Antonio Castagna Fabio Mercurio Banca IMI, Milan In the current markets, options with different strikes or maturities are usually priced with different implied volatilities.
More informationLecture 6 BlackScholes PDE
Lecture 6 BlackScholes PDE Lecture Notes by Andrzej Palczewski Computational Finance p. 1 Pricing function Let the dynamics of underlining S t be given in the riskneutral measure Q by If the contingent
More informationOption Portfolio Modeling
Value of Option (Total=Intrinsic+Time Euro) Option Portfolio Modeling Harry van Breen www.besttheindex.com Email: h.j.vanbreen@besttheindex.com Introduction The goal of this white paper is to provide
More informationForward Price. The payoff of a forward contract at maturity is S T X. Forward contracts do not involve any initial cash flow.
Forward Price The payoff of a forward contract at maturity is S T X. Forward contracts do not involve any initial cash flow. The forward price is the delivery price which makes the forward contract zero
More informationChapter 1: Financial Markets and Financial Derivatives
Chapter 1: Financial Markets and Financial Derivatives 1.1 Financial Markets Financial markets are markets for financial instruments, in which buyers and sellers find each other and create or exchange
More informationLECTURE 9: A MODEL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE
LECTURE 9: A MODEL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE 1. Foreign Exchange Contracts There was a time, not so long ago, when a U. S. dollar would buy you precisely.4 British pounds sterling 1, and a British pound sterling
More informationOption Valuation. Chapter 21
Option Valuation Chapter 21 Intrinsic and Time Value intrinsic value of inthemoney options = the payoff that could be obtained from the immediate exercise of the option for a call option: stock price
More informationECON20310 LECTURE SYNOPSIS REAL BUSINESS CYCLE
ECON20310 LECTURE SYNOPSIS REAL BUSINESS CYCLE YUAN TIAN This synopsis is designed merely for keep a record of the materials covered in lectures. Please refer to your own lecture notes for all proofs.
More informationMarkov modeling of Gas Futures
Markov modeling of Gas Futures p.1/31 Markov modeling of Gas Futures Leif Andersen Banc of America Securities February 2008 Agenda Markov modeling of Gas Futures p.2/31 This talk is based on a working
More informationCHAPTER 15. Option Valuation
CHAPTER 15 Option Valuation Just what is an option worth? Actually, this is one of the more difficult questions in finance. Option valuation is an esoteric area of finance since it often involves complex
More informationExplicit Option Pricing Formula for a MeanReverting Asset in Energy Markets
Explicit Option Pricing Formula for a MeanReverting Asset in Energy Markets Anatoliy Swishchuk Mathematical & Computational Finance Lab Dept of Math & Stat, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
More informationMore Exotic Options. 1 Barrier Options. 2 Compound Options. 3 Gap Options
More Exotic Options 1 Barrier Options 2 Compound Options 3 Gap Options More Exotic Options 1 Barrier Options 2 Compound Options 3 Gap Options Definition; Some types The payoff of a Barrier option is path
More informationTransformations and Expectations of random variables
Transformations and Epectations of random variables X F X (): a random variable X distributed with CDF F X. Any function Y = g(x) is also a random variable. If both X, and Y are continuous random variables,
More information4: SINGLEPERIOD MARKET MODELS
4: SINGLEPERIOD MARKET MODELS Ben Goldys and Marek Rutkowski School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney Semester 2, 2015 B. Goldys and M. Rutkowski (USydney) Slides 4: SinglePeriod Market
More informationCOMPLETE MARKETS DO NOT ALLOW FREE CASH FLOW STREAMS
COMPLETE MARKETS DO NOT ALLOW FREE CASH FLOW STREAMS NICOLE BÄUERLE AND STEFANIE GRETHER Abstract. In this short note we prove a conjecture posed in Cui et al. 2012): Dynamic meanvariance problems in
More informationwhere N is the standard normal distribution function,
The BlackScholesMerton formula (Hull 13.5 13.8) Assume S t is a geometric Brownian motion w/drift. Want market value at t = 0 of call option. European call option with expiration at time T. Payout at
More informationThe Valuation of Currency Options
The Valuation of Currency Options Nahum Biger and John Hull Both Nahum Biger and John Hull are Associate Professors of Finance in the Faculty of Administrative Studies, York University, Canada. Introduction
More informationHedging Exotic Options
Kai Detlefsen Wolfgang Härdle Center for Applied Statistics and Economics HumboldtUniversität zu Berlin Germany introduction 11 Models The Black Scholes model has some shortcomings:  volatility is not
More informationSensitivity analysis of utility based prices and risktolerance wealth processes
Sensitivity analysis of utility based prices and risktolerance wealth processes Dmitry Kramkov, Carnegie Mellon University Based on a paper with Mihai Sirbu from Columbia University Math Finance Seminar,
More informationMartingale Pricing Applied to Options, Forwards and Futures
IEOR E4706: Financial Engineering: DiscreteTime Asset Pricing Fall 2005 c 2005 by Martin Haugh Martingale Pricing Applied to Options, Forwards and Futures We now apply martingale pricing theory to the
More informationHedging Options In The Incomplete Market With Stochastic Volatility. Rituparna Sen Sunday, Nov 15
Hedging Options In The Incomplete Market With Stochastic Volatility Rituparna Sen Sunday, Nov 15 1. Motivation This is a pure jump model and hence avoids the theoretical drawbacks of continuous path models.
More informationBlackScholesMerton approach merits and shortcomings
BlackScholesMerton approach merits and shortcomings Emilia Matei 1005056 EC372 Term Paper. Topic 3 1. Introduction The BlackScholes and Merton method of modelling derivatives prices was first introduced
More informationFundamentals of Futures and Options (a summary)
Fundamentals of Futures and Options (a summary) Roger G. Clarke, Harindra de Silva, CFA, and Steven Thorley, CFA Published 2013 by the Research Foundation of CFA Institute Summary prepared by Roger G.
More informationLogNormal stockprice models in Exams MFE/3 and C/4
Making sense of... LogNormal stockprice models in Exams MFE/3 and C/4 James W. Daniel Austin Actuarial Seminars http://www.actuarialseminars.com June 26, 2008 c Copyright 2007 by James W. Daniel; reproduction
More informationOther variables as arguments besides S. Want those other variables to be observables.
Valuation of options before expiration Need to distinguish between American and European options. Consider European options with time t until expiration. Value now of receiving c T at expiration? (Value
More informationOption Pricing. Chapter 9  Barrier Options  Stefan Ankirchner. University of Bonn. last update: 9th December 2013
Option Pricing Chapter 9  Barrier Options  Stefan Ankirchner University of Bonn last update: 9th December 2013 Stefan Ankirchner Option Pricing 1 Standard barrier option Agenda What is a barrier option?
More informationDerivation and Comparative Statics of the BlackScholes Call and Put Option Pricing Formulas
Derivation and Comparative Statics of the BlackScholes Call and Put Option Pricing Formulas James R. Garven Latest Revision: 27 April, 2015 Abstract This paper provides an alternative derivation of the
More informationLecture 6: Option Pricing Using a Onestep Binomial Tree. Friday, September 14, 12
Lecture 6: Option Pricing Using a Onestep Binomial Tree An oversimplified model with surprisingly general extensions a single time step from 0 to T two types of traded securities: stock S and a bond
More informationSimple formulas to option pricing and hedging in the Black Scholes model
Simple formulas to option pricing and hedging in the Black Scholes model Paolo Pianca Department of Applied Mathematics University Ca Foscari of Venice Dorsoduro 385/E, 3013 Venice, Italy pianca@unive.it
More information