PROJECT EVALUATION REPORT

Transcription

1 DEVELOPING NEW APPROACHES AND VIRTUAL APPLICATIONS IN ENTREPRENEURSHIP TRAINING TR01-KA

2 2 PROJECT PARTNERS ESKİŞEHİR İŞ GELİŞTİRME MERKEZİ A.Ş. University G.d Annunzio New Enterprise Technology (Ud Anet) Kuzey Doğu Anadolu Kalkınma Ajansı (KUDAKA) Bpm Uluslararası Proje Yönetim Turizm Danışmanlık Bilgisayar Yazılım Tercümanlık San. Tic. Ltd. Şti. Akademia Finansow i Biznesu VistulaDr. Marta Coelho Türk Hava Kurumu Üniversitesi This book has been prepared within the scope of TR01-KA Developing New Approaches and Virtual Applications in Entrepreneurship Training and granted by European Union. The content does not reflect the views of European Union or Center for European Union Education and Youth Programmes-Turkish National Agency in any case.

3 3 INTRODUCTION Project assessment report reveals the extent to which and how the project goals are achieved, how efficiently and effectively project is managed, the extent to which the project outputs and results are achieved and how efficiently actions of the project are implemented. Projects are assessed in three basic phases. They are first assessed when the project proposal is submitted. In this phase, the project is assessed under the titles, namely, compliance with the targets, relevance, feasibility, risks, effect logics and targeted / expected outputs. Secondly, project is assessed at the phase of implementation. In this phase, it is assessed in terms of corrective precautions, improving and developing implementation. Finally, the project is assessed after the completion of project implementation. In this phase the extent to which the project achieved its goals, the level of effect, management quality, level of outputs and results and activity quality. In the last phase, the assessments are made through external assessment / independent assessment method or self / internal assessment method. External assessment / independent assessment are made by external / independent expert. In this phase, there is no relevance with the project or the institution implementing the project. Staff of the personnel and the institution performing the self / internal project performs this as an activity of the project. Assessment report of this project is created through the use of internal assessment method. The staff designated by the coordinating institution and partners have produced this report. First, a detail questionnaire to cover the process and outputs of the project is prepared. The content of the questionnaire contains the matters related to project management, participations of the partners, communication, project outputs, dissemination and project meetings. These detailed matters enable the partners to assess administrative financial and output-based assessment of the project. In addition, detailed data and findings are obtained in relation to all the processes of the project. Particularly the questionnaire has led to measuring the satisfaction level of the partners, determining weak and strong points of the project and the product and measuring the efficiency of the project actions. Questionnaire is the best mean of giving feedback about the efficiency of internal control activity. Within this framework,

4 4 questionnaire has provided comprehensive evaluation of partners as the entities witnessing and experiencing the project phases individually. Questionnaire has created a set of detailed data and findings about the project phases and the products. Findings obtained as a result of the questionnaire and evaluations of the project have created objective data for the evaluation. Preparation of the questionnaire comprehensively has given way to obtain more and more findings.

5 5 CONTENTS 1. AIMS AND TARGETS OF THE EVALUATION EVALUATION METHOD QUESTIONNAIRE FORM Management Of The Project Commitment Of Partners Communication Project Output Dissemination Project Meetings QUESTIONNAIRE Management of The Project Contribution Of The Partners Communication Project Outputs Dissemination Project Meetings Final Evaluation Of Project QUESTIONNAIRE REPORT Report of Project Management Contributions from the Partners Communication Project Outputs...45

6 Dissemination Project Meetings FINDINGS OF QUESTIONNAIRE Project Management Contributions from Partners Communication Project Outputs Dissemination Project Meetings GENERAL EVALUATION AND CONCLUSION NOTES... 54

7 7 1. AIMS AND TARGETS OF THE EVALUATION The aim of the project assessment is to measure and assess the performance of project management, project outputs, and project process and project partners. Through this assessment report, quality, efficiency and effects of the project is assessed and reported. In addition, the assessment reveals the extent to which the project has achieved its goals, the extent to which the project outputs have been produced, the extent to which the partners have made contributions and the extent to which the project has been disseminated. Virtual (mobile application and innovative (e-learning module) applications have been developed in relation to entrepreneurship training within the scope of the project. In addition, the needs in relation to entrepreneurship have been identified and the curriculum of entrepreneurship training has been created. Entrepreneurs will test the feasibility and suitability of their enterprises through mobile application created. E- learning module will enable entrepreneurs to get access to learning and training sources. Training curriculum created will meet the need of training program of the institutions providing entrepreneurship training. General purpose of our project is to make contributions to entrepreneurship culture at EU level and to improve entrepreneurship as basic and cross-skill. The target of the project is to produce solution for the problems encountered by available, new and potential entrepreneurs throughout the process of entrepreneurship, enable them to more successful individual in their business life, facilitate them to have access to training and learning sources where they can get success in processes of entrepreneurship, support them for developing business idea and realizing such business ideas and allow them to act in planned and programmed way during and after setting up their business. The project evaluation has been made within the framework of the project targets as specified above. It is because these objectives have been committed during the phase of project writing. Thanks to this evaluation, the extent to which these objectives have been achieved or not shall be evaluated. All the partners have been required to reply to questionnaire and the findings have been revealed in order to measure to what extent these objectives have been reached. The main aim of examining the project conduct questionnaire has been to evaluate to what extent

8 8 each product has made contributions to the realization of the project objectives. The questionnaire implemented to the partners has been prepared to cover all the processes of the project and in way to measure to what extent project objectives have been measured. Thanks to comprehensive questionnaire implemented to the partners, the extent to which the project objectives have been achieved and the project has been executed effectively has been determined. Findings arising out of questionnaire and the on-site investigation have been taken as an important parameter for measuring the quality of the project.

9 9 2. EVALUATION METHOD The project has been evaluated considering the method of internal evaluation. Evaluation has been made considering the standards specified in the internal evaluation. Implementation of questionnaire to the partners and creation of evaluation findings have been employed as method for evaluating the project. First of all, the scope and the content of the questionnaire to be applied to the partners have been formulated. The questionnaire has been prepared in way to cover all the processes and outputs of the project. The titles of project management, contributions of the partners, communication, project outputs and dissemination and project meetings have been included in the content of the questionnaire. These titles have enables the project to be evaluated by the partners on the basis of administration, financing and outputs. In addition, it has led to the creation of more detailed data and findings in relation to all the processes of the project. The part of findings in the evaluation has been formulated as a result on the basis of results from the questionnaire. The part of findings has served to revealing the deficiencies as well as the quality of the project. The part of findings has covered findings in respect to project management, communication, dissemination, project outputs individually and project meetings. The content of the questionnaire produced for the partners has been formulated by 2 leading experts. This way of preparation has enabled to have content of questionnaire in compliance with the criteria of evaluation, covering project management and preparation of project outputs accordingly.

10 10 3. QUESTIONNAIRE FORM Dear partner of the EntreApp project, With the following questions we would like to get a feedback from you concerning the quality of the EntreApp project as for management, collaboration, commitment of partners, communication, project output, dissemination and project meetings. This is only an internal evaluation. Thanks for your contribution 3.1. Management Of The Project Certainly Rather Hard to Rather Certainly yes yes say no no The project coordination was clear The project coordination was effective The leadership was effective Coordinator was committed in the project Quality of relationship with the partners was high All partners were treated equally Roles and responsibilities of partners were clear Partners were aware of the common project goals and the specific objectives for each partner institution Each partner was consulted when important decisions regarding the process of the project had to be made All relevant information was available in due time There was a clear time table with activities for each partner The coordinator respected the deadlines Meetings took place at agreed time and location

11 11 Meetings followed an agreed agenda beforehand All partners were given an opportunity to contribute to the meeting Minutes were taken and agreed by all partners Each partner was made aware of the financial implication of the project Each partner was asked to provide their individual financial accounts according to the reporting procedure agreed by the partnership 3.2. Commitment Of Partners Certainly Rather Hard to Rather Certainly yes yes say no no Each partner committed time and resources in line with agreed work plan Each partner respected the deadlines Each partner attended meetings Each partner took part in the agreed dissemination plan Each partner responded to requests for financial or other administrative material on time Each partner showed willingness to solve problems Each partner looked for opportunities to enhance the project There was a clear evidence of sharing of roles and responsibilities by each member of the partnership Project partners developed a sense of ownership of the project There was mutual understanding among the partnership Each partner had a positive attitude to participation

12 12 Equality of participation 3.3. Communication Certainly Rather Hard to Rather Certainly yes yes say no no Communication was effective and took into account any disparity in the provision of IT within the partnership Effective communication took place on a regular basis Materials and information was spread effectively All used concepts were clear for everybody Information between levels flew effectively Language competences were taken into account Communication did not favour any partner or exclude partners from important project information 3.4. Project Output Certainly Rather Hard to Rather Certainly yes yes say no no Project outputs were prepared according project application form. The outcomes of the project are proficient enough academically and pedagogically. The web site of the project is useful and easy to understand. All of the outcomes of the project were shared on the web site. The materials concerning disseminating and visibility of the project are well-designed and disseminated.

13 13 The reports of needs analysis are well-prepared and shared with the partners. The curriculum was prepared well so as to be used as educational program of entrepreneurship. The distant education portal was prepared so as to be comprehensible and useful. The distant education portal was prepared in accordance with e-learning format. Mobile application portal was prepared so as to be comprehensible and useful Dissemination Certainly Rather Hard to Rather Certainly yes yes say no no Dissemination of the project was done effectively. All of the partners did the duty of dissemination well in the regions they reside. The social networking sites were used effectively to disseminate the project. The means of media were used effectively to disseminate. The web site of the project was used effectively to disseminate. All of the partners used the web site effectively to disseminate the project Project Meetings Certainly Rather Hard to Rather Certainly yes yes say no no The kick-off meeting took place

14 14 without any problem. All of the partners participated in the kick-off meeting. The process of the project was clearly defined and the duties and the responsibilities of the partners were stated openly during the kick-off meeting. The organization of the meeting in Poland took place without any problem. All of the partners participated in the meeting in Poland. A sound analysis and evaluation was done about the outcomes which were produced or will be produced during the meeting in Poland. The organization of the meeting in Italy took place without any problem. All of the partners participated in the meeting in Italy. A sound analysis and evaluation was done about the outcomes which were produced or will be produced during the meeting in Italy. The final organization took place without any problem. All of the partners participated in final conference. All of the outcomes were handed out to the partners, they were well-advertised and necessary evaluation was done during the final meeting. 4. In your opinion did the project meet or exceed the targets set? 5. Did the quality of work match or exceed expectations?

15 15 6. Considered all in all: How satisfied are you with the project? Very satisfied Satisfied Hard to say Not satisfied Not at all satisfied Thank you very much for completing this questionnaire

16 16 4. QUESTIONNAIRE 4.1. Management of The Project

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20

21 21

22 Contribution Of The Partners

23 23

24 24

25 25

26 Communication

27 27

28 28

29 Project Outputs

30 30

31 31

32 32

33 Dissemination

34 34

35 Project Meetings

36 36

37 37

38 38

39 Final Evaluation Of Project

40 40 5. QUESTIONNAIRE REPORT The questionnaire has been formulated under the titles of project management, contributions from the partners, communication, project outputs and dissemination and project meetings. The content of the questionnaire has been determined by external evaluation expert and entrepreneurship expert. Within the scope of the questionnaire works, preparation of questionnaire has been outsourced from a questionnaire firm. Questionnaire has been prepared considering the reliability (objectivity) and validity (scope) Report of Project Management For the item asking Project coordination has been clear, 1 partners have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 4 partners have replied Not Sure. According to replies by the partners, project coordination has been clear. For the item asking Project coordination has been efficient, 5 partners have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 1 partners have replied Not Sure. According to replies by the partners, project coordination has been efficient. For the item asking Leadership has been efficient, 5 partners have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 1 partners have replied Not Sure According to replies by the partners, leadership has been efficient. For the item asking Coordinator has executed works with devotion, 5 partners have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 1 partners have replied Yes. All the partners have concluded that coordinator has executed works with devotion. For the item asking Relation among the partners has been quite good, 4 partners have replied Strongly Yes 2 partners have replied yes. According to this result, it has been concluded that the relation among the institutions have been absolutely good. For the item asking All the partners have been equally behaved, All the partners have replied Strongly Yes. According to replies, it has been deducted that partners have been equally behaved. For the item asking Roles and responsibilities of the partners have been clear, 4 partners have replied Strongly Yes, 1 partner have replied Yes and 1 partner have

41 41 replied Not Sure. Partners have been in the opinion that roles and responsibilities assigned have been clear. The number of those replying Strongly Yes has been greater than those replying Yes. For the item asking All the partners have been well aware of the general objectives of the project and their responsibilities, 4 partners have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 2 partners have replied Yes. According to replies, partners have been well aware of the general objectives of the project and their responsibilities. For the item asking Advice of each partner has been considered at the phase of making important decisions about the project, 5 partners have replied Strongly Yes, 1 partner have replied Yes and 1 partner have replied Not Sure. According to replies by the partners, advice of each partner has been requested at the phase of making important decisions about the project For the item asking Necessary information has been submitted in timely manner, 3 partners have replied Strongly Yes, 1 partner have replied Yes and 1 partner have replied Not Sure. According to replies by the partners, information about the project has been provided in timely manner. For the item asking Each partner has had a clear time sheet about their plans, 2 partners have replied Strongly Yes, 3 partners have replied Yes 1 partner have replied Not Sure. According to replies by the partners, a time sheet has been available about the plans. For the item asking Coordinator has acted in compliance with time sheets, 3 partners have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 3 partners have replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, coordinator has acted in compliance with time sheets. For the item asking Meetings have been held at the place and on time as agreed, 5 partners have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 1 partner have replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, meetings have been held at the place and on time as agreed.

42 42 For the item asking A cycle map has been specified before the meetings, 4 partners have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 2 partners have replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, a cycle map has been specified before the meetings. For the item asking Each partner has been provided with opportunity to make contributions to meetings, 5 partners have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 1 partners have replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, partners have been provided with opportunity to make contributions to meetings. For the item asking Minutes have been written upon the approval of all the partners, 4 partners have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 2 partners have replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, minutes have been issued upon the common resolution of the partners. For the item asking All the partners have been informed about the financial status of the project, All the partners have replied Strongly Yes. According to replies by the partners, partners have been informed about the financial status of the project. For the item asking Each partner has been allowed to provide their financial accounts according to reporting procedures, all the partners have replied Strongly Yes. According to replies by the partners, action has been taken according to reporting procedures of the partners Contributions from the Partners For the item asking All the partners have made contributions to the project in the sense of time and resource, 1 partner have replied Strongly Yes, 4 partners have replied Yes and 1 partner have replied Not Sure. According to replies by the partners, partners have spent time and resource for the project according to work schedule. For the item asking All the partners have paid attention to timing, 4 partners have replied Yes, whereas 2 partners have replied Not Sure. According to replies by the partners, generally attention has been paid to timing. However, There are not partners have replied Strongly Yes.

43 43 For the item asking All the partners have taken part in the meetings, 1 partner has replied Strongly Yes, whereas 5 partners have replied Yes. Participation is complete according to answer of partners. For the item asking All the partners have taken part in dissemination activities as agreed, All the partners have replied Strongly Yes. According to replies by the partners, partners have taken part in dissemination activities. Upon the examination of self-evaluations and peer reviews of the partners, dissemination activities of the parties have been determined. For the item asking All the partners have communicated financial and managerial materials as required in timely manner, 1 partner have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 5 partners have replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, financial and managerial materials required from the partners have been communicated in timely manner. For the item asking All the partners have made sincere contributions to the solutions of the problems, 3 partners have replied Strongly Yes, 2 partners have replied Yes and 1 partner have replied Not Sure. According to replies by the partners, partners have made contributions to the solutions of the problems. For the item asking All the partners have been in search of opportunity for improving the project, 5 partners have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 1 partner has replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, partners have been in search of opportunity for improving the project. For the item asking Roles and tasks are delegated among all the partners clearly, 4 partners have replied Strongly Yes, 2 partners have replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, generally roles and tasks are delegated among all the partners clearly. For the item asking Project partners have tendency to adopt the project, 2 partners have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 4 partners replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, partners have tendency to adopt the project.

44 44 For the item asking Project partners have acted with a common mentality, 2 partners have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 4 partners replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, partners have acted with a common mentality. For the item asking All the partners have positive tendency in terms of participation, 4 partners have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 2 partners replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, partners have positive tendency in terms of participation in the project. For the item asking The principle of equality has been observed in relation to participation, 3 partners have replied Strongly Yes, 3 partners have replied Yes and 1 partner have replied Not Sure. According to replies by the partners, the principle of equality has been observed in relation to participation Communication For the item asking Communication has been efficiently created among the partners and necessary technology has been used., 5 partners have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 1 partner have replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, communication has been efficiently created among the partners and necessary technology has been used for this matter. For the item asking Efficient communication has been created regularly, 4 partners have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 2 partner has replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, efficient communication has been created regularly. For the item asking Information and material has been efficiently shared, 1 partners have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 1 partner has replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, information and material has been efficiently shared. For the item asking Concepts used have been expressed clearly for all the partners, 5 partners have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 1 partner has replied Not Sure. According to replies by the partners, concepts used have been expressed clearly for all the partners. For the item asking Information exchange among different units has been efficiently realized, 5 partners have replied Strongly Yes and 1 partner have replied Not Sure.

45 45 According to replies by the partners, information exchange among different units has been efficiently realized. For the item asking Competencies in foreign language have been taken into consideration, 4 partners have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 2 partners have replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, competencies in foreign language have been taken into consideration. For the item asking All the partners have been equally considered at the point of communication and it has been monitored that the information provided has reached to target unit, 3 partners have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 3 partners has replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, all the partners have been equally considered at the point of communication and it has been monitored that the information provided has reached to target unit Project Outputs For the item asking Project outputs have been prepared in the way as desired, 5 partners have replied Strongly Yes and 1 partner have replied Not Sure. According to replies by the partners, outputs have been prepared according to a project form. For the item asking Project outputs have been sufficient pedagogically and academically., 5 partners have replied Strongly Yes, 1 partners have replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, project outputs have been sufficient pedagogically and academically. For the item asking Website of the project is useful and clear, 5 partners have replied Strongly Yes and 1 partner have replied Not Sure. According to replies by the partners, web site of the project is useful and clear. During the phase of on-site investigation of the project, web site has been examined in detail. It has been determined that web site has been designed clearly and neatly. For the item asking All the project products have been shared on the website, 5 partners have replied Strongly Yes and 1 partner have replied Not Sure. According to replies by the partners, all the project products have been shared on the website. Upon the examination of the web site, it has been determined that all the training materials have been shared in relation to project.

46 46 For the item asking Dissemination and visibility materials of the project have been designed and distributed with the content and quality as intended, 5 partners have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 1 partners have replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, dissemination and visibility materials have been designed and distributed with quality and at a number as intended. For the item asking Need analysis reports have been appropriately prepared and shared with the partners, 5 partners have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 1 partners have replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, need analysis reports have been appropriately prepared and shared with the partners. For the item asking Curriculum has been prepared with a quality and content to be used as a entrepreneurship training programme 5 partners have replied Strongly Yes 1 partners have replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, curriculum has had the level of being used as training program. For the item asking Distance learning portal has been prepared usefully and in an easy way to understand, 5 partners have replied Strongly Yes and 1 partner have replied Not Sure. According to replies by the partners, distance learning portal is clear and useful. For the item asking Distance learning portal has been prepared in compliance with e-learning format, 5 partners have replied Strongly Yes 1 partner have replied Not Sure. According to replies by the partners, portal has been prepared in compliance with e-learning format. For the item asking Mobile Application has been prepared usefully and in an easy way to understand, 5 partners have replied Strongly Yes and 1 partner have replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, Mobile Applicaton is clear and useful Dissemination For the item asking Project has been efficiently disseminated, 3 partners have replied Strongly Yes, 3 partners have replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, dissemination has been carried out sufficiently. For the item asking All the partners have disseminated the project efficiently in their own countries, localities and institutions, All the partners have replied Strongly Yes.

47 47 For the item asking Means of social media have been used for dissemination efficiently, 2 partners have replied Strongly Yes, 2 partners have replied Yes 2 partners have replied Not Sure. According to replies by the partners, social media underutilised efficiency. For the item asking Means of press have been used for dissemination efficiently, 2 partners have replied Strongly Yes, 1 partner have replied Yes and 1 partner has replied Not Sure. According to replies by the partners, means of press haven t been used efficiently. For the item asking Project web site has been used for dissemination efficiently, 4 partners have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 2 partners have replied Not Sure. According to replies by the partners, project web site has been efficiently used for dissemination. For the item asking All the project partners have made efficient use of websites for the dissemination of the project, 4 partners have replied Yes, whereas 2 partners have replied Not Sure. According to replies by the partners, partners have made efficient use of their own websites Project Meetings For the item asking Kick-off meeting has been organized without any problem, 4 partners have replied Strongly Yes, whereas 2 partners has replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, kick-off meeting has been realized without any problem. For the item asking All of the partners have taken part in kick-off meeting without any problem, 5 partners has replied Strongly yes and 1 partner have replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, all the partners haven t taken fully part in final meeting. For the item asking Project process has been clarified in the kick-off meeting and tasks and responsibilities of the partners have been specified clearly, 3 partners have replied Strongly Yes, 2 partners have replied Yes 1 partner have replied Not sure. According to replies by the partners, project process has been clarified in the kick-off meeting.

48 48 For the item asking Meeting organization of Poland has been realized without any problem, All the partners have replied Strongly Yes. According to replies by the partners, the meeting of Poland has been realized without any problems. For the item asking All the partners have taken part in the meeting of Poland, All the partners have replied Strongly Yes. According to replies by the partners, all the partners have taken part in the meeting. At the phase of on-site investigation of the project, attendance list has been examined and it has been determined that all the partners have taken part in the meeting. For the item asking A clear analysis and evaluation has been made in relation to the outputs produced and to be produced in the meeting of Poland, 5 partners have replied Strongly Yes and 1 partner have replied Yes. According to replies by the partners, analysis and evaluation has been made about the outputs produced and to be produced. For the item asking Meeting of Italy has been organized without any problem, All partners have replied Strongly Yes. According to replies by the partners, the meeting of Italy has been realized without any problem. For the item asking All the partners have taken part in the meeting of Italy All partners have replied Strongly Yes. According to replies by the partners, all the partners have taken part in the meeting. At the phase of on-site investigation of the project, attendance list pf meeting in Italy has been examined and it has been determined that all the partners have taken part in the meeting. For the item asking A clear analysis and evaluation has been made in relation to the outputs produced and to be produced in the meeting of Italy All partners have replied Strongly Yes. According to replies by the partners, analysis and evaluation has been made about the outputs produced and to be produced. For the item asking Final meeting has been organized without any problem One partner have replied Strongly Yes, one partner have replied Yes and 4 partners have replied Not Sure. According to replies by the partners, there is a problem in the final meeting.

49 49 For the item asking All the partners have taken part in the Final Meeting One partner have replied Strongly Yes, one partner have replied Yes and 4 partners have replied Not Sure. According to the replies by the partners, all the partners haven t taken part in the meeting. For the times asking All the products have been presented to the partners and evaluated during the final meeting One partner have replied Strongly Yes, one partner have replied Yes and 4 partners have replied Not Sure. According to replies by the partners, all the products haven t been presented to the partners, the promotion has been and evaluated in the final meeting.

50 50 6. FINDINGS OF QUESTIONNAIRE 6.1. Project Management Project coordination and leadership has been clear and efficient, Timing sheet has been made available in relation to tasks and responsibilities, Tasks and responsibilities of the partners have been well specified, Partners have been informed about the project in timely manner, The partners have been well aware of the objectives of the project and acted in this framework, Partners have been asked to present their opinions in the decision-making processes about the project, 6.2. Contributions from Partners Partners have made contributions in the sense of timing and resource, Partners have communicated financial and managerial materials to coordinating institution, Partners have made contributions to the solutions of the problems in relation to the project, Partners have tendency to adopt the project, Partners have tendency to take part in implementation processes of the project, Partners have made contributions to the dissemination activities Communication Communication among the partners has been created through use of necessary technologies efficiently and regularly. Information and material has been exchanged in the communication. Competencies of foreign language have been taken into consideration in the communication Project Outputs Web page has been prepared usefully and in an easy way to understand, All the project outputs have been shared on the web page, Project outputs have been prepared in a way to be committed in the project form, Project outputs have been prepared in a way to be used as training material, Need Analysis, curriculum, distance learning module and mobile application have been prepared with an appropriate content.

51 Dissemination The project hasn t been disseminated at sufficient level and in an effective way. Web address, press and means of social media have been used. 6.6 Project Meetings Kick-off meeting, meeting of Poland and meeting of Italy meeting have been held without any problem. Final meeting hasn t made. Evaluations have been made in except final meeting in the all the meetings about the products.

52 52 7. GENERAL EVALUATION AND CONCLUSION Evaluation of the project consists of applying questionnaire to the partners and determining the findings. A very detailed questionnaire has been formulated in a way to cover all the phases of the project and applied to the partners. Project products and other documents have been investigated on site and findings have been specified. Data from questionnaire has been taken as the findings of the project evaluation. The questionnaire has consisted of titles, namely project management, communication, contributions of the partners, project outputs and dissemination and project meetings. Questions of questionnaire have been asked in a way to enable partners to evaluate the project effectively and comprehensively under these titles. Partners have expressed that project management has been coordinated efficiently and effectively, tasks and responsibilities have been explicitly assigned, timing planning has been made for the tasks and responsibilities and all the partners have been provided with the chance of making contributions to the project management. Partners have stated that they have made contributions to the project on the basis of timing and resources, they have prepared administrative and financial materials required, they have made contributions to the solutions of the problems throughout the project, they have participated in the project and all the partners have acted in coordinated way. Partners have stated that communication has been created through efficient and continuous use of the technology, knowledge and material has been effectively exchanged, the concepts which are easy to understand by all the partners have been used and the linguistic differences have been considered. The part of the project outputs has become the part where partners have replied Yes mostly. Partners have stated that the outputs are fine, feasible, easy to understand and useful and these outputs can be used as education materials. The partners have stated that the project is not disseminated efficiently. They have expressed that web, social media and tools of press have been used.

53 53 Partners have uttered that the except for the final meeting other meetings have been held without any problems, all the partners have taken part in all the meetings apart from 3 meetings and evaluations have been made in the meetings.

54 54 NOTES

55 55