The Maximum Concurrent Flow Problem


 Angelina Daniels
 3 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 The Maximum Concurrent Flow Problem FARHAD SHAHROKHI University ofnorth Texas, Denton, Texas AND D. W. MATULA Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas Abstract. The maximum concurrent flow problem (MCFP) is a multicommodity flow problem in which every pair of entities can send and receive flow concurrently. The ratio of the flow supplied between a pair of entities to the predefined demand for that pair is called throughput and must be the same for all pairs of entities for a concurrent flow. The MCFP objective is to maximize the throughput, subject to the capacity constraints. We develop a fully polynomialtime approximation scheme for the MCFP for the case of arbitrary demands and uniform capacity. Computational results are presented. It is shown that the problem of associating costs (distances) to the edges so as to maximize the minimumcost of routing the concurrent flow is the dual of the MCFP. A pathcut type duality theorem to expose the combinatorial structure of the MCFP is also derived. Our duality theorems are proved constructively for arbitrary demands and uniform capacity using the algorithm. Applications include packetswitched networks [ 1, 4, 81, and cluster analysis [ 161. Categories and Subject Descriptors: F.2.2 [Analysis of Algorithms and Problem Complexity]: Nonnumerical Algorithms and Problemscomputations on discrete structures; routing; G.2.2 [Discrete Mathematics]: Graph Theorygraph algorithms; network problems; path and circuit problems General Terms: Algorithms, Experimentation, Theory Additional Key Words and Phrases: Concurrent network flow, cut saturation, duality theorems, multicommodity flow, network partitioning, polynomialtime approximation scheme, primaldual algorithms, routing in networks, throughput I. Introduction The single commodity flow problem has a rich theory and many applications in operations research and combinatorics. The original flowaugmentation algorithm developed by Ford and Fulkerson [7] has all of the following features: (i) it identifies a maximum flow value and flow assignment achieving that value, (ii) it identifies a minimum capacity cut that contains edges saturated under any optimal solution, (iii) it provides a proof of the maxflow mincut theorem. Authors addresses: F. Shahrokhi, Department of Computer Science, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203; D. W. Matula, Department of Computer Science, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX Permission to copy without fee all or part of this material is granted provided that the copies are not made or distributed for direct commercial advantage, the ACM copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date appear, and notice is given that copying is by permission of the Association for Computing Machinery. To copy otherwise, or to republish, requires a fee and/or specific permission ACM l/90/ $01.50 Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery. Vol. 37, No. 2, April pp
2 Maximum Concurrent Flow Problem 319 The elegance of this approach is in the understanding of the structure of the underlying flow problem provided by the interpretation of the dual problem (the mincut problem) that is implicitly solved. The original labeling algorithm to solve the problem in [7] was not polynomially time bounded, but a series of progressively faster polynomialtime algorithms have been devised for the problem (see [25]). Unfortunately, not much of the structure attendant to the single commodity flow problem has been discovered for multicommodity flow problems. More specifically, no efficient labeling algorithm is known to solve any multicommodity flow problems except for the cases in which the number of commodities is two [lo] or in which certain strong planarity conditions exist on the underlying graph [ 5, 14, 231. Our results here describe a multicommodity flow problem that is shown to possess many features analogous to the single commodity flow problem. The maximum concurrent flow problem (MCFP) [ 151 is a multicommodity flow problem in which all pairs of entities can concurrently send or receive flow and is an optimization version of the feasibility problem in multicommodity flows [ 11, 181. The MCFP is best motivated by a variation of the routing problem in packetswitched telecommunication networks, for example, see [ 11, [4], and [8]. Informally, consider a network of entities (cities, computers, etc.) in which there exists a demand for flow between all pairs of entities. The flow is sustained through channels with certain capacities. For the MCFP, it is desired to assign flow to each route of the network, such that the ratio of the flow supplied between each pair of entities to the demand between that pair (termed the throughput) is the same for all pairs of entities. This flow assignment must respect the capacity constraints; that is, the total flow through a channel should not exceed its capacity. The MCFP is to assign flow to the routes such that the throughput is maximized. A flow rerouting approximation algorithm for the MCFP was introduced in [3] and also employed in [26]. An extension of this algorithm in [22] was shown computationally to provide for the solution of much larger problems than could be solved by specialized linear programming codes [ 131. No complexity results were presented in [2], [22], or [26]. The principle result of this paper is to prove that an appropriately modified version of the flow rerouting algorithm for the MCFP allowing arbitrary demands with uniform capacity is a fully polynomialtime approximation scheme. In this paper we also pursue the duality theory of the MCFP. The use of distance functions in the formulation of the dual of certain multicommodity flow problems was initially suggested by Ford and Fulkerson [6], and was a key feature of the supply consumption theorem for the feasibility problem [ 181. Our first duality theorem extends this dual distance relationship of multicommodity flow. We show that the maximum throughput of an MCFP can be alternatively obtained by minimizing (over all distance functions) a distancederived upper bound on the throughput. As for a combinatorial dual for the MCFP, recall that Menger s theorem (see [9]) exhibits a fundamental pathcut duality for standard graph connectivity. Ford and Fulkerson extended this combinatorial pathcut duality to singlecommodity network flow in their maxflow mincut theorem [7]. Our effort to derive a natural combinatorial pathcut dual for the MCFP is embodied in a second duality theorem. We formalize the notion of the density of a kpartite cut, and then derive the following theorem: The maximum throughput of any concurrent flow equals the minimum density of any kpartite cut. Both of our duality theorems are proved constructively for the uniformcapacity MCFP case using our algorithm.
3 320 F.SHAHROKHIANDD.W.MATULA The MCFP is formally defined in Section 2. Two linear programming (LP) formulations of the MCFP are presented. From established LP theory, the MCFP is shown to be solvable in polynomially bounded time. Certain combinatorial properties of the MCFP are explored, and two convenient upper bounds on throughput are derived. In Section 3, we give our fully polynomialtime approximation scheme for the MCFP with arbitrary demands and uniform capacity. Computational results indicate that the algorithm is etlicient in practice. Finally, Section 4 is devoted to the duality theory of the MCFP. 2. The Maximum Concurrent Flow Problem (MCFP) We assume throughout this paper that graph G = ( V, E) is undirected and has vertex set I/= (1, 2,..., n 1. We denote by P, the set of all paths containing the edge e, for each edge e E E, and by Pij the set of all paths between end vertices i, j (called ij paths), for each distinct pair of vertices i, j E I. Also let P denote the set of all nontrivial paths in G. A capacity function on G is a function C: E * R+, where R+ is the set of nonnegative reals. A demand function D on G is a function D: V x V + R+, such that D(i, j) = D(j, i) and D(i, i) = 0 for all i, j E V, where D(i, j) > 0 for some i, j E V. A concurrent flow of throughput Z in G is a functionf: P , R+ such that (i) CPEPijf(p) = ZD(i, j) for all distinct pairs of vertices i, j E Vand (ii) Cpep,f(p) 1 C(e) for every edge e E E, where D and Care the given demand and capacity functions on G. For convenience of notation we extend the domain of a concurrent flowfto P U E using f(e) = Ep f(p) for all e E E. e A maximum concurreptflow is then a concurrent flow function having the largest attainable throughput Z. The maximum concurrent j7ow problem (MCFP) is to determine a maximum concurrent flow and the maximum throughput 2. For any particular concurrent flow functionf; we term the paths assigned nonzero flows active paths forf; and those edges e for whichf(e) = C(e) edges saturated by f: An edge of G is critical if it is saturated by every maximum concurrent flow. The established literature on linear programming and multicommodity network flow provides several immediate observations about the solution of an MCFP, and the active paths and saturated edges corresponding to particular maximum concurrent flows. First note that the MCFP can be formulated as a network linear program in either the edgepath form or the nodearc form. 2.1 EDGEPATHFORMOFTHE MCFP. Maximize Z subject to LP,~~(P)  ZD(i, j) = 0 for all distinct i, j E V, (2.1) { C,H+J(P) 5 C(e), where D, C are the demand and capacity functions on G = ( V, E). 2.2 NODEARCFORMOFTHE MCFP Maximize Z subject to hf+(i(l) (.f;k  &> = Z Cj D(i, j) if I = i, ZD(i >,) otherwise, for all edges e = lk in E, for all i, I E V, (2.2)
4 Maximum Concurrent Flow Problem 321 where fh, is the flow of the commodity i on the edge kl from k to 1 for all i, k, I E C/and N(I) is the set of vertices adjacent to 1, for all 1 E V. Observation 1. The MCFP is solvable in polynomially bounded time. Furthermore, the uniform demand MCFP is solvable by a strongly polynomial algorithm. Reason. The linear program (2.2) is solvable in polynomially bounded time by algorithms of either Khachiyan or Karmarkar [ 121. For uniform demand, the MCFP falls into a class of combinatorial linear programs for which Tardos exhibits a strongly polynomialtime solution [24]. Specifically, this latter case means the solution of (2.2) is obtained in polynomially bounded time where the number of arithmetic operations is polynomially bounded in ] V] + ] E ] and independent of the size of the numbers occurring as capacities. The nodearc solution of (2.2) is readily transformed in (strongly) polynomial time to an edgepath solution of (2.1) yielding at most ] T/J ] E ] active paths, so both the maximum throughput and a maximum concurrent flow are obtainable in polynomial time. Observation 2. For any MCFP there is a maximum concurrent flow with at most ( 2 ) + ] E ] active paths, that is, an average of at most two active paths per pair of vertices. Reason. Clearly an optimal basic solution to (2.1) provides a solution where at most ( 2 ) + ] E ] paths are active. Note that since any routing table requires at least one route per vertex pair, this observation affirms the existence of a solution to the MCFP with reasonably practical size in the resulting routing table. Two convenient upper bounds on throughput are given in the following lemma. One bound derives from determining flow across the most constraining cut. Notationally, the cut (A, 2) is the set of edges between A and 2 = V  A, where CM 3 = L(A,Z) C(e) and WA, 2) = CieA,jez D(i, j) denote, respectively, the capacity and demand across the cut. Another bound on throughput is obtained from relating the total available capacity to the total demand. The most restrictive form of this latter constraint is obtained by weighting the capacities and demands by a distance function, with the distance defined on the edges, vertex pairs, and paths as follows. A distance function on G = (V, E) is a function d: E + RC such that d(e) > 0 for at least one edge e, where the domain of d is extended to E U V X I/ U P by d(p) = C 44 for all p E P, eep d(i, j) = $;W(P)l for all i, j E V. A shortest distance ij path p E Pij has d(p) = d(i, j). We denote by Z, the distance ratio of capacity to demand for distance d, as given by zd = LE d(ek (e) J&j d(i, jp(i, j) LEMMA 2.1. Let G, D, and C be an instance ofthe MCFP. Then the throughput Z of any concurrent flow f satisfies (i) [Cut Upper Bound]. For any cut (A, 2) in G with C;EA,jEz D(i, j) > 0, (2.3) z I C(A, = CeE64,.z~ C(e) D(A, A) C;EA,jEZ D(i,j) (2.4)
5 322 F.SHAHROKHIANDD.W.MATULA (ii) [Distance Upper Bound]. For any distance don G with C;<j d(i, j)d(i, j) > 0, zrz,= LEE d(ejc(ej C;<, 46 jjd(i, jj PROOF OF (i). The total flow supplied between A and 2 is Z C;EA,jEz D(i, jj, while the total capacity available between A and 2 is CeEcA,z) C(e); therefore, (2.5) or Z5 c &A,.? C(e) CiEA,jEx DO, jj. PROOF OF (ii). Consider the expression CpEP d( p)f( p j. Then, C d(pjf(p) 2 C 46 j) E,,f(p) = Z C d(i, j)d(i, j). PEP i<j i<j Furthermore, It follows that C d(pjf(p) = & 44.Ecp f(p) 5.& d(e)c(e). PEP e z ( &E d(e)c(ej = z Ci<j d(i, j)d(i, j) d Q.E.D. Gerla [8] observed and employed the cut upper bound of Lemma 2.1 in his development of the cut saturation algorithm for packetswitched network routing (see also [4]). Unfortunately, the cut upper bound is subject to an inherent gap [ 15, 171. Specifically, the MCFP for the graph & with unit capacities on the edges and unit demands between all vertex pairs is readily seen (by employing d(e) = 1 on each edge in (2.5)) to have an optimal throughput of 3/7 with a lowest minimumcut upper bound (over all cuts) of l/2. The possibility that an inherent gap can exist in (2.4) and that removal of the saturated (critical) edges may yield a partition into more than two parts means that less than complete solutions to the MCFP are obtainable by methods (e.g., [2, 81) focusing on a saturatededges partition into two parts. Our methods derive from the more general Distance Upper Bound (2.5). We call d an optimal distancefunction for the MCFP whenever the corresponding distance ratio Zd equals the maximum throughput Z. Our results in Sections 3 and 4 are specific to MCFPs with uniform capacity and are sufficient to prove that an optimal distance function always exists for these instances. A further aspect of the duality between maximum concurrent flows and optimal distances valid for all MCFPs is given in the following lemma. LEMMA 2.2. f is a maximum concurrent flow and d is an optimal distance function for a given MCFP ifand only ifboth (i) all active paths for f are shortest paths under d, and (ii) edges assigned nonzero distance by d are saturated byf:
6 Maximum Concurrent Flow Problem PROOF. Assuming (i) and (ii) we have 323 Z C d(i,jp(i, j> = C 4kj) C f(p) i<j icj pt, so then = C d(p)f(~) = C d(e) C f(p) = C d(e)c(e), PEP &E PEP, FGE z = LEE d(ek(e) Ci<j d(i, j)d(i, j) = zd confirming Z to be the maximum throughput, f to be a maximum concurrent flow, and d to be an optimal distance function. On the contrary, if(i) is false, then and if (ii) is false, then C 4L j).ecp f(p) < pzp d(~)f(p), i<j u C 44.Fp f(p) < EE 4dC(d, CEE e so if either (i) or (ii) is false, the throughput Z forfis strictly less than the distance ratio Zd for d. If 2 is the maximum throughput, then either Z < 2 and f is not a maximum concurrent flow, or Z < Zd and d is not an optimal distance function. Q.E.D. COROLLARY 2.3. Any optimal distancefunction dfor an MCFP assigns nonzero distances only on critical edges. PROOF. Assume the optimal distance function d assigns nonzero distance to some noncritical edge e. There must exist some maximum concurrent flow fe that does not saturate e since e is not critical. But these properties forfe and d contradict Lemma 2.2, verifying the corollary. Q.E.D. It is sometimes more convenient to treat maximizing the throughput of the concurrent flow as minimizing the utilized capacity to realize the demands. For a given G, D and C, a concurrent flow f: P + R+ of capacity utilization u in G satisfies Cpgp,j f(p) = D(i, j) for all i, j E Vand Cpsp, f(p) 5 UC(e) for all e E E. The minimum capacity utilization problem (MCUP) is to find the smallest capacity utilization u* achieved by a concurrent flowf: Observe that iff is a solution to the MCUP with the capacity utilization u *, then jdefmed by j (p) = f(p)/u* for all p E P is a maximum concurrent flow of throughput 2 = l/u*. 3. An Approximation Algorithm for the Uniform Capacity MCFP Although the linear programming technique for the MCFP (in Section 2) is polynomially bounded, it is practically ineffective on all but very small problems. The edgepath formulation of the MCFP can be solved using linear programming techniques that use special network structures [ 131. Such methods store the LP matrix implicitly. However, ( I 2 I ) + 1 E ] rows and at least as many columns must be explicitly stored. Thus, LP techniques are typically limited to problems of at most 40odd vertices [20].
7 324 F. SHAHROKHI AND D. W. MATULA We now present an capproximate algorithm [ 191 to solve the MCFP with uniform capacity for any t > 0. In this algorithm, there is an implicit need for very high precision computation. We give Algorithm R for analysis of the complexity, assuming sufficient precision. We have introduced in our implementation slight refinements to Algorithm R for finite precision computation. Regarding approximate solutions to the MCFP, we shall term fan toptimal concurrent flow if its throughput 2 satisfies (Z  2)/Z 5 t. We shall further term d an toptimal distance function if its distance ratio & satisfies (Z,  2)/Z, 5 t. Algorithm R [Reroute]. The input to the algorithm is a nontrivial connected graph G, a demand matrix D, constant capacity function C: E + c and 0 < t I 1. The output is an coptimal concurrent flow 7 of throughput z and an eoptimal distance function d with distance ratio Z, such that (Z  2)/Z I 6 and (Z,  z)/z, 5 E where 2 is the optimal throughput. Without loss of generality, we assume that C;<j D(i, j) = 1 and c = 1. The reader will note that these assumptions implyz2 1. Rl. [Determine the initial feasible solution.] Set d(e) = l/] E I for all edges e E E. For each pair of distinct vertices i, j E V, set f(p) = D(i, j) for one shortest distance ij path p. Setf(e) = CpEP,f(p) for all e E E. Set P = (p If(p) > 0). Set u. = e2/32 ] E I 3. (Here and in subsequent steps, we shall maintain CrEE d(e) = 1 and f(p) = 1. We further maintain for p E P that either f(p) 2 go or izp= D(i, j) < go for p an ij path.} R2. [Compute new distance function and find shortest paths.] Set d(e) = ewk2 I E I l4fcen LZ exp((2 I E I */4f(e >) for all e E E. For each pair of distinct vertices i, j find a shortest distance ij path and the distance d(i, 3. R3. [Compute the throughput, distance upper bound, and check for termination.] Set f* = max{f(e) 1 e E El, 2 = l/f*, and Zd = l/xi<, d(i, j)d(i, j). If (Zd  z)/zd 5 6, then compute the concurrent flow 7 with the throughput z using Y(p) J$.$) for all paths p with f(p) > 0. Output 7, Z, d, and Zd and halt. {Note then that (Z  2)/Z = 1  z/z z/z, = (Zd  Z)/Z, 5 E. 1 R4. [Reroute flow.] For each i, j E V, denote by pi a particular active path between i and j whose length d(pij) computed using the edge distances d(e) is at least as great as any of the active paths (i.e., those currently assigned nonzero flow) between vertices i and j. Then determine a particular vertex pair k, 1 E Vsuch that d(pk )  d(k, 1) = max(d(p j)  d(i, j) I i, j E V, D(i, j) 1 ao]. For this vertex pair k, 1 E V, denote by p * a particular shortest path between k and 1 (thus, d(p,) = d(k, I)), and let the notation pk  p.+ indicate those edges in pk and not in p,. Then set d* = &p~~p. d(e) and d, = CeEp,+ d(e). Set d* fj = qg 1% d, *
8 Maximum Concurrent Flow Problem 325 Iff(pk ) 2 u + uo, then reroute u units of flow from pk to p* and set P = P U (p, ); otherwise, reroute all the flow on pk to p* and set P = P U (p, 1  {p ). Update the flow valuesf(pk ),f(p*), andf(e) for edges in p*, pk. Go to R2. (Note that d* gives the sum of distances on edges whose flows are to be lowered and d, gives the sum of distances on edges whose flows must be raised.) The relationship between the MCFP and the MCUP is used by Algorithm R. In fact, Algorithm R solves the MCUP by supplying the demand between all pairs (step R 1) and assigning much larger distances to the edges hosting larger flows (step R2). This will make the paths containing highly utilized edges less attractive for future flow assignments, since rerouted flow is always sent on a shortest distance path. Step R3 computes a concurrent flow and its throughput using the current utilization factor which isf*. Step R4 is the most important part of the algorithm. In this step, the algorithm generally reduces the flow on highly utilized edges and increases the flow on poorly utilized edges. More important, it is not claimed that the computedf* should monotonically decrease with each cycle through steps R2R4. Rather the result that Algorithm R eventually (and efficiently) achieves an acceptably low utilization factor without the possibility of cycling is proved in Theorem 3.3. We first obtain two lemmas. LEMMA 3.1. Let f and d be the existing flow and distance functions at R2. Then P  p~pfb)4p) = f  ezefcev(e) 5 &, wheref* = max(f(e) I e E El. PROOF. Observe that CpEP f(p)d(p) therefore = CeEE f(e)d(e) and CCE~ d(e) = 1, The nonzero terms of the righthand side of (3.1) must correspond to e E E with f(e) c f*, for which Thus d(e) = ew((2 I E I /4f(e>) LTE w%(2 I E I */4f(e )> 1 5 I E I MP  f(e)>) I 5 (2 I E I */t)(f*  f(e)) * f* f(e) CEE ' (p  f(e))d(e) 5 ee~,&=~* ((2 I E I */W*  f(e)>) implyingf*  CpEPf(p)d(p) I 42 1 E 1, which proves the lemma. QED.
9 326 F. SHAHROKHI AND D. W. MATULA LEMMA 3.2. Assume R has not terminated at R3. Then in R4 for pk, d*, d,, k, I, U, we have (i) d*  d, = d(pk )  d(k, I) > c/31 E 1 and (ii) (T z 2ao, where u. is defined as in R 1. PROOF. Assume that R has not terminated and that d*  d, = d(pk )  d(k, I) 5 t/3 1 E I. We show that, for Zd and z as computed in R3 of the current iteration, we have (Zd  z)/z, 5 6. This will, however, contradict the assumption that R has not halted. We proceed as follows: p;pf 04r4 = r<i c p&f(p)d(p) + i;j P;ptjf(p)d(p)* D(l.jkq W,i)<e3 But d(pk )  d(k,,) 5 c/3 1 E 1 implies that d(p)  d(i, j) 5 e/3 I E I for any active z j path p with D(i, j) I uo. Thus, icj D(i,j)BBrJ C p~ijf04a) = E icj D(i,j) O,J 5 izj d(i, jw, j> + C W, 3  i<j 3l El = C d(i,jpg,j) + 3,cEl. i<j (3.2) Note that for any i, j E V with D(i, j) < u. the rerouting procedure in R4 guarantees that there is exactly one active jj path and that this path hosts D(i, j) < u. units of flow. Also, d(p) zs 1 for all p E P. Therefore C pz,,jfw(p) 5 C, &f(p) 5 icj i<j 8, D(i,iFq D(i.Wo0 (3.3) Using (3.2) and (3.3), we get c2 C f(p)d(p) 5 C 44 jp(i, PEP i<j j) + fq + ~ 3w1 < ++d 2 IA (3.4) Also, by Lemma 3.1, p~pfw(p) rf* & Combining this and (3.4) we have L+z.f*=& zd IEI Z (3.5) However, CeEE d(e) = 1 for any distance function constructed by R. Therefore, using the distance ratio in Lemma 2.1, we have l/z 2 l/z& Thus, (3.5) implies L+ E &  z z=z (3.6) & IEl z.& Or?z,=z &
10 Maximum Concurrent Flow Problem 327 Note that assigning a distance of 1 to all edges and applying Lemma 2.1 will yield a distance ratio which is at most ] E 1. Thus, Z I Z I I E) and (3.6) implies (Z,  Z)/Zd 5 t, which is the desired contradiction for part (i). To prove (ii), note that 0 < d, 5 1 and by part (i) d*  d, 2 c/3 I E I. Thus, d*/d, = 1 + (d*  d, )/d, 1 1 f 43 I E 1, implying c a=qp &)z 16;El,=2q,. Q.E.D. An tapproximate algorithm with computing time polynomially bounded both in problem size and 1 /E is called a fully polynomialtime approximation scheme. THEOREM 3.3. Algorithm R is a fully polynomialtime approximation scheme and terminates with an eoptimal concurrent flow and an toptimal distance function. Furthermore, the concurrent flow constructed at any iteration of R does not utilize more than 0( I E I 3/e2) active paths. PROOF. Lemma 3.2 implies that in R4 u 2 coo; therefore, the rerouting procedure in R4 guarantees that in any iteration of the algorithm each active ij path has at least u. units of flow on it, unless D(i, j) < co. Since the sum of demands for all pairs is unity, it follows that there are at most (l/go) + ( 2 ) = 0( ] E ( 3/c2) active paths at any iteration of R. We now show that R terminates. Let Si denote J&E exp((2 I E I /c) f(e)) in iteration i of R, where f is the concurrent flow function as in step R2. The idea underlying the proof is to show that Si+r/Si is always less than some fixed positive constant (which is less than unity), yielding convergence (as we will show) in polynomially bounded time. Consider pki, p *, d*, d, as they are defined in R4. We consider two cases derived from whether part or all of the flow is rerouted from pk to p*, and obtain a general upper bound on Si+,/Sj. Case 1. [Partial rerouting from pk to p *.] This corresponds to f(pk ) z g + uo, so that u units of flow are rerouted from pk to p*. This then increases the flow on the edges of p *  pk by u and decreases the flow on the edges of pk  p* by u, all other edge flows remaining the same. Hence, employing functionsj; d as existing from step R2, si  s,,, = ILw~, si ew((2 I E I 2/c)f(e)) si + CrEp,~k/ w((:! I E I 2/t)f(e)) CrEpk~p, wu C1jEp,pk~ ww si I E I 2/c)(f(e)  a)) si I E I 2/E)(f(e) + a)) si = d* + d,  exp(2 f 2u)d*  exp(f)d,. (3.7)
11 328 F. SHAHROKHI AND D. W. MATULA However, exp((2 ] E ] /t)o) = m. Therefore, (3.7) implies si  si+k Si =d*+d*+yi*(~yd* = d* + d,  + < 5 2 and since R has not halted, by Lemma 3.2, d*  d, > 43 ] E 1. Thus, (3.8) implies (3.8) simsi+,, E2 Si  36IEl* Case 2. the flow on pk is rerouted to p *. As in case 1, we have Si  Si+l Si (3.9) [Total rerouting from pk to p*.] In this case f(pk ) < u + u. and all = d* + d,  exp 2 1 E;I/(Pk ))d* _ exp(2 1 EI;f(Pk ))d,. c3.10j Treat the righthand side of (3.10) as a function of the flow to be rerouted and observe that for any fixed d*, d, the function F(x) = d* + d,  exp ( Iflix)d* _ exp(??)& is monotonically increasing for x E [0, ~1 and monotonically decreasing for x E [a, 2~1; furthermore, for all x E [0, a], F(u + x) = F(u  x). Also, the rerouting procedure in R4 implies that u. 5 f(pk ) < u. + u. Thus, F(f(pk )) I min(f(uo), F(uo + u)). But by Lemma 3.2, u 2 2uo, implying that u  u. 1 uo, which implies that F(uo + u) = F(a  uo) 2 F(uo). Therefore, Si  Si+l Si = W(Pk >) 2 Rue) Considering u > uo, we have (d*  (d*  m = J*  d,)/2, sz by Lemma 3.2 = exp(2 I E I *UO/C)  1 )(d*  exp( ] t 2uo)d,). (3.11) exp(2 I E I *uo/~ d*  exp (3.12) Also, exp(2 1 E I *uo/t)  1 )= 1 exp(21f12uo) exp(2 I E I *u0/4 = 1 exp 2IEl* t* t 32lE( = 1 exp(*)zk(l$&). (3.13)
12 Maximum Concurrent Flow Problem 329 It follows from (3.12) and (3.13) that SiSj+l 1 C * si Tic0 JEl. (4 Note that (3.14) and (3.9) indicate that in either case 1 or case 2, si+l <I C2 100 IEl si i ) for all i I 1. Now assume that R did not halt after m iterations. Then (3.14) (3.15) For any concurrent flow f existing in any iteration of R, 0 I f(e) P 1, for all e E E. Thus, S, 5 ( E I exp(2 I E I /t) and S m+l L I E I. Therefore, (3.15) implies and 2IEl* m 5 t log(1  (l/loo)(~/l E I) 21E12 < t(l/loo)(t/l E I)* = 200lEl t3. (3.16) Note that R2 and R4 are the most expensive steps of R. At any iteration, R2 and R4 require 0( I 1/l ) and 0( I VI I P I ) time, respectively, where P is the set of all active paths in this iteration. But I P I = O() E) /t ) and R halts after at most 0( 1 E I /e3) iterations. Thus, Algorithm R has time complexity O( 1 I 1 ) E I /c ). Q.E.D. Observe in the proof of Theorem 3.3 that it is the quantity which experiences a guaranteed monotonically decreasing behavior through successive cycles of steps R2R4 of Algorithm R. This fact confirms that successive flow functions cannot be identical even though some successive values off* may be identical. According to our analysis the worst case behavior of Algorithm R, although polynomially time bounded, does not look too promising. We feel that a better upper bound on the worstcase complexity probably exists. But of greater practical significance is the improved efficiency observed for our implementation over a wide selection of applications. PERFORMANCE OF ALGORITHM R. A slightly modified version of R was implemented using the Pascal language on a VAX 1 l/780 with the UNIX 4.2 operating system. In order to avoid overflow, the distance function was computed using d(e) = ew(df(e)  P>) LTE ew(4f(e )  YV where f* = max( f(e) I e E EJ. In theory, for any CY 1 2 I E I */t, the algorithm
13 330 F. SHAHROKHI AND D. W. MATUL.A Graph K4.6 K 8.12 K K32,48 KSO.50 Q3 Q4 ii random random random TABLE I. PERFORMANCEOFTHEFLOWREROUTINGALGORITHMS No. of vertices No. of edges Avg no. of active Avg length CPU paths of active time Upper per pair paths set z bound I I converges to a desirable toptimal solution, but large values of LY will cause underflow in finite precision computation. Our test results, however, indicate that small values of (Y(which do not cause underflow) will also result in convergence to reasonably good approximations. In our implementation the value of a is initially selected such that d(e) > for all e E E. If the convergence rate is slow, however, the value of (Y is increased. The values for (Y were observed to be in the range of 0.5 to 50 for all test cases in Table I. We ran our implementation on a wide range of data and the results summarized in Table I are selected from those described in [22]. Graphs 1 through 8 are from the current literature [3, 261. Since these benchmark cases did not go beyond graphs of 31 vertices, we supplemented them with sequences of bipartite and random graphs, and cubes. The capacity and demand are both unit functions for all cases in Table I. Our results in Table I show a significant improvement in the size of the problem solved compared to [3], [20], and [26], which only solve problems of size at most 40 vertices. Note that the random graph on 120 vertices and 3598 edges in Table I would yield a formidable linear program (nodearc or edgepath) of some 10,000 rows and at least 10,000 columns. Algorithm R took only 20 minutes of VAX time to solve this case. The upper bounds given in Table I are each the better of the computed distance upper bound 2, and a determined cut upper bound when available as per Lemma 2.1. As a final remark in this section, we compare the results summarized in Table I to the statement of Observation 2 in Section 2, by observing that the average number of active paths per pair of vertices is in all cases at most Duality Theory for the MCFP Various extensions of the maxflow mincut theorem to multicommodity flow problems have been discussed by previous researchers. Ford and Fulkerson
14 Maximum Concurrent Flow Problem 331 employed a dual distance function for a multicommodity flow problem in an early application of this technique [6]. A duality result analogous to that of the single commodity flow problem for the 2commodity flow problem was presented in [lo]. Regarding duality in the feasibility problem for multicommodity flow, an initial significant result was the supply consumption theorem of Onaga [ 181: Given the sourcesink pairs (Si, ti), positive demands D(s,, ti) i E Q, and capacity function C, the demands are realizable iff for any distance function d on G, CeGE C(e)d(e) 2 CiEo D(si, ti)d(si, ti). hi [ 1 I] gave a concise proof of this theorem using the duality theory of linear programming. He also showed that it is sufficient to consider a finite number of inequalities involving only bounded integral values for distances. We now shall give two duality theorems for the MCFP. The first continues the development of associated distance functions and may be considered a natural generalization of Onaga s realizability result to the arena of dual optimization. For the case of uniform capacity, our result is shown constructively (in the limit) using our approximation algorithm. THEOREM 4.1 [Maxflow Mindistance ratio Theorem]. Let G, D, represent an instance of the MCFP with uniform capacity c on each edge and pn optimal throughput 2. Then where 2 = mini& 1 d is a distance function on G), Zd = c CeEE d(e) Ci<j d(i, j)d(i, j) PROOF. For simplicity and with no loss of generality assume that c = 1, Ci<j D(i, j) = 1, and CpEE d(e) = 1 for all distance functions d. Let S be the set of all distance ratios. By Lemma 2.1, Z is a lower bound of S. The correctness of Algorithm R implies that, for any e > 0, there exist concurrent flow and distance functions 7 and d, respectively, such that Z 2 Z 2 Z,( 1  t). Thus, Z = inf S. To complete the proof we show that inf S E S. Denote the edges in E by el, q,..., elel and let X be the subset of the Euclidean space RIEl with CXi = 1 for all (Xl, x2, **a, xl El ) E X, Xi z 0 for all i. Consider the function f: X + R by fh, x2,..., xl El ) = Ci<j d(i, j)d(i, j), where d is the distance function identified by assigning distance xi to the edge ei, i = 1, 2,..., ] E ]. It is readily seen that f is a continuous function from the compact metric space X to the metric space R+. Thus sup f(x) E f(x), implying that inf S = l/sup(f(x)) and that inf S E S. Q.E.D. Our second duality theorem is more revealing and exposes the combinatorial structure of the MCFP. Recall that the dual for the single commodity flow problem is characterized by a cut, in particular by the max flowmin cut theorem [7]. We now exhibit the cut structure of the MCFP through its dual relation to a unique partition into k 2 2 parts, where the value of k is determined by the instance of the MCFP. Let G = ( V, E) be a graph; denote by (A,, AZ,..., Ak) for k 2 2, the set of all edges in G whose end vertices are in distinct elements of the partition (A,, AZ,..., Ak) of V. We call (A,, AZ,..., Ak) a kpartite cut in G. The following theorem is an extension of [ 151 and explores the structure of the critical edges, that is, those edges that are necessarily saturated by any maximum concurrent flow. We point out that the following result holds for arbitrary capacities and demands.
15 332 F.SHAHROKHI AND D.W.MATUL,A THEOREM 4.2. Let G, D, C be an instance of the MCFP. Denote by fa maximum concurrent flow, by E,, the set of all saturated edges under f, andfinally by E,, the set oj critical edges. Then (i) G  E, is disconnected and (ii) E, is a kpartite cut, for some k 2 2. PROOF. Assume, to the contrary that G  E, is connected. Then there is a spanning tree T of G such that none of the edges in T are saturated under f We can increase the flow on some path p E Pij by ED(i, j) for all i, j E I/ and some c > 0, concurrently. This contradicts the optimality of 7 and proves (i). To prove (ii) note that if E = E,, then the result is trivially true. Assume that E # E,, then for every e E E  E, there must be a maximum concurrent flow function fe such that f,(e) < C(e) (i.e., fe does not saturate e, since e is not critical). Define 7: P + R+ by yyp) = LEEE, fp(p) IEI  IEcl * Then 7 is a maximum concurrent flow in G only saturating the edges in E,. By part (i), G  E, is disconnected. Let A,, AZ,..., Ak denote the vertex sets of the components of G  E,. We have (A,, AZ,..., Ak) G E,. Assume that (A,, AZ,..., Ak) # E,; let e = tl E E,  (A,, AS,..., Ak). Then vertices t, 1 are in Aj for some j, 1 I j % k. Since Aj is connected, there is a tf path D (in A,) containing only unsaturated edges. Let c = mine,5 (C(e)  J (e)). Then t > 0. Let p E P, be an active mn path, m, n E V. There exists an mn path q such that q does not contain e, and every edge in q is either in p or p. Reroute min(c, f(p)] units of flow from p to q, maintaining the optimality of the new concurrent flow and contradicting the criticality of e, which proves part (ii). Q.E.D. From Theorems 4.1 and 4.2, we can now fashion a combinatorial duality relation between concurrent flow and kpartite cuts. Let G, D, and C represent an instance of the MCFP and let (A,, AZ,..., Ak) denote any kpartite cut of G. For 1 I i, j 5 k, let C(Ai, A,) denote the total capacity of all edges between Ai and A,, and let D(Ai, Aj) denote the total demand between vertices of Ai and Aj. Let den(a,, AZ,..., Ak) denote the density of the kpartite cut (A,, AZ,..., Ak) as defined by Clsi<jck WijC(Ai, Aj) den(a,, AZ,..., Ak) = min w Cisi<jsk wijd(a;, Aj) (4.1) where the minimum is over all symmetric distance functions w satisfying the triangle inequality Wij + Wj/ I Wi/ for all 1 5 i, j, 1~ k, where Crci<j5k w;jd(ai, Aj) # 0. Note that for any 2partite cut (A, A) of G, the density is simply which is the expression for the cut upper bound in Lemma 2.1. Formula (4.1) generalizes the notion of density to kpartite cuts in a manner allowing us to formulate the following combinatorial duality theorem. In order to be consistent with Theorem 4.1, our proof here again is restricted to the case of uniform capacity. THEOREM 4.3 [Maxconcurrent flow Min kpartite cut Theorem]. For any untform capacity MCFP, the maximum throughput of any concurrent jlow equals
16 Maximum Concurrent Flow Problem 333 TABLE II. ANALOGOU RESULTS IN THE THEORIES OF THE SINGLE COMMODITY NETWORK FLOW [7] AND THE CONCURRENT FLOW Objective Cut Inequality Properties Critical Saturated Edges Duality Theorem Proof/Algorithm Paradigm Single Commodity (SourceSink) Flow Maximize value of sourcetosink flow Plow value less than or equal to capacity of any cut Edges saturated by every maximum flow contain a minimum cut The maximum value of any flow equals the minimum capacity of any cut Plow augmentation proves duality and provides an efftcient algorithm Flow Type Concurrent (All Pairs) Flow Maximize throughput of concurrent flow Throughput less than or equal to density of any cut Edges saturated by every maximum concurrent flow constitute a kpartite cut The maximum throughput of any concurrent flow equals the minimum density of any kpartite cut Plow rerouting proves duality and provides an efticient algorithm the minimum density of any kpartite cut, and in particular, equals the density of the kpartite cut of critical edges. PROOF. Let G, D, and constant capacity C be an instance of the MCFP. By Corollary 2.3 any optimal distance function d assigns nonzero distance values only to critical edges, which by Theorem 4.2 compose the kpartite cut E, = (A,, A2, * *., Ak). Furthermore, an optimal distance function must clearly then ascribe the same distance d(u, v) for any u E A;, v E Aj for parts A;, Aj of E,. So we may set wij = d(u, v), and so determine W;j for all 1 I i, j 5 k, i # j, and from Theorem 4.1, then obtain den(a,, AZ,..., Ak) 5 2. Conversely, for any jpartite cut (A,, AZ,..., Aj), 2 I j P n, let w be a weight function minimizing (4.1). Now we may construct a distance function by setting d (e) = w (i, j) whenever the end vertices of e are in different parts Ai, Aj, i # j and d (e) = 0, otherwise. The shortest distance function extension of d in G to V X I/ yields d (u, v) 2 WQ for u E Ai, v E Aj, i # j, since w satisfies the triangle inequality. Furthermore, d (u, v) = wl: if some edge e E E joins a vertex Of Ai to a vertex of AI. If there are no edges between Ai and Aj, then C(Ai, Aj) = 0; hence, &GE d (e)c(e) = Cix;<jsk wbc(ai, Aj). Recalling d (u, V) 2 w,$ for u E Ai, v E Aj, i # j, we obtain w$ = d (u, v) since w minimizes the righthand side of (4.1). Thus, den(ar, AZ,..., Aj) 2 & 1 2, and the theorem follows. Q.E.D. The form of Theorem 4.3 in our mind properly identifies the inherent pathcut duality in the MCFP, and illustrates the particular significance of distance as pertinent only between parts of the uniquely determined critical kpartite cut. We note that Theorem 4.3 can be readily extended by suitable linear programming arguments and shown to hold for arbitrary capacity and demand functions. Table II as extended from [ 151, summarizes the results for duality of the MCFP analogous to the important aspects of single commodity flow theory.
17 334 F. SHAHROKHI AND D. W. MATULA REFERENCES 1. AITAR, R. A Distributive Adaptive Multipath RoutingConsistent and Conflicting Decision Making, 80/ 8 1, Aiken Computation Laboratory, Harvard Univ., Cambridge, Mass. 2. BIANCHINI, R. P., AND SHEN, J. P. Interprocessor traffic scheduling algorithms for multipleprocessor networks. IEEE Trans. Comput. C36 (1987), BISWAS, J., AND MATULA, D. W. Twoflow routing algorithms for the maximum concurrent flow problem. In Proceedings of the ACM Fall Joint Conference. ACM, New York, 1986, pp BOORSTYN, R. R., AND FRANK, H. Largescale network topological optimization. IEEE Communications (Jan. 1977), DIAZ, H., AND GHELLINK, G. Multicommodity maximum flow in planar networks (Dalgorithm approach). CORE Discussion Paper No Center for Operations Research and Econometrics, LouvainlaNeuve, Belgium, FORD, L. R., AND FULKERSON, D. R. A suggested computation for maximal multicommodity network flows. Manage. Sci. 5 (1958), FORD, L. R., AND FULKERSON, D. R. Flows in Networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., GERLA, M. A cut saturation algorithm for topological design of packetswitched communication networks. In Proceedings of the National Telecommunication Conference. Dec. 1974, pp HARARY, F. Graph Theory. AddisonWesley, Reading, Mass., Hu, T. C. Integer Programming and Network Flows. AddisonWesley, Reading, Mass., IRI, M. On an extension of the maximumflow minimumcut theorem to multicommodity flows. J. Oper. Res. SOC. Japan 5,4 (Dec. 1967), KARMARKAR, N. A new polynomial time algorithm for linear programming. Combinatorics 4, 4 (1984), KENNINGTON, J. L., AND HELGASON, R. V. Algorithms for Network Programming. Wiley, New York, MATSUMOTO, K., NISHIZEKI, T., AND SAITO, N. Planar multicommodity flows, maximum matchings and negative cycles. SIAM J. Comput. 15,2 (May 1986), MATULA, D. W. Concurrent flow and concurrent connectivity in graphs. In Graph Theory and Its Applications to Algorithms and Computer Science, Alavi, Y., Chartrand, G., Lesniak, L., Lick, D., and Wall, C. E., eds. Wiley, New York, 1985, pp MATULA, D. W. Divisive vs. agglomerative average linkage hierarchical clustering. In Classification as a Tool of Research. Gaul, W., and Schader, M., eds. NorthHolland, Amsterdam, 1986, pp OKAMURA, H., AND SEMOUR, P. D. Multicommodity flows in planar graphs. J. Comput. Theory, Ser. B 31 (1981), ONAGA, K. A multicommodity flow theorem. Trans. ZECE, Japan, 53A, 7 (1970), PAPADIMITRIOU, H., AND STIEGLITZ, K. Combinatorial Optimization: Algorithms and Complexity. PrenticeHall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., PATTY, B. W. The basis suppression method for linear programs with special structure excluded by an objective side column. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Operations Research and Engineering Management. Southern Methodist Univ., Dallas, Tex., SHAHROKHI, F. Approximation algorithms for the maximum concurrent flow problem. ORSA J. Comput. 1, 2 (1989), SHAHROKHI, F., AND MATULA, D. W. On solving large maximum concurrent flow problems. In Proceedings of the ACM Computer Conference. ACM, New York, 1987, TANG, D. T. Bipath networks and multicommodity flows. IEEE Trans. Circuit Theory CT1 1 (1964), TARDOS, E. A strongly polynomial algorithm to solve combinatorial linear programs. J. Oper. Res. 34 (1986), TARJAN, R. E. Data Structures and Network Algorithms. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, Pa., THOMPSON, B., AND MATULA, D. W. A flow rerouting algorithm for the maximum concurrent flow problem with variable capacities and demands, and its applications to cluster analysis. Tech. Rep. 86CSE12. Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering. Southern Methodist Univ., RECEIVED MARCH 1987; REVISED FEBRUARY 1988 AND APRIL 1989; ACCEPTED JUNE 1989 Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, Vol. 37, No. 2, April 1990
Approximation Algorithms
Approximation Algorithms or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Deal with NPCompleteness Ong Jit Sheng, Jonathan (A0073924B) March, 2012 Overview Key Results (I) General techniques: Greedy algorithms
More informationSHARP BOUNDS FOR THE SUM OF THE SQUARES OF THE DEGREES OF A GRAPH
31 Kragujevac J. Math. 25 (2003) 31 49. SHARP BOUNDS FOR THE SUM OF THE SQUARES OF THE DEGREES OF A GRAPH Kinkar Ch. Das Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721302, W.B.,
More information! Solve problem to optimality. ! Solve problem in polytime. ! Solve arbitrary instances of the problem. #approximation algorithm.
Approximation Algorithms 11 Approximation Algorithms Q Suppose I need to solve an NPhard problem What should I do? A Theory says you're unlikely to find a polytime algorithm Must sacrifice one of three
More informationNan Kong, Andrew J. Schaefer. Department of Industrial Engineering, Univeristy of Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA
A Factor 1 2 Approximation Algorithm for TwoStage Stochastic Matching Problems Nan Kong, Andrew J. Schaefer Department of Industrial Engineering, Univeristy of Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA Abstract We introduce
More informationApproximation Algorithms: LP Relaxation, Rounding, and Randomized Rounding Techniques. My T. Thai
Approximation Algorithms: LP Relaxation, Rounding, and Randomized Rounding Techniques My T. Thai 1 Overview An overview of LP relaxation and rounding method is as follows: 1. Formulate an optimization
More information2.3 Scheduling jobs on identical parallel machines
2.3 Scheduling jobs on identical parallel machines There are jobs to be processed, and there are identical machines (running in parallel) to which each job may be assigned Each job = 1,,, must be processed
More informationChapter 11. 11.1 Load Balancing. Approximation Algorithms. Load Balancing. Load Balancing on 2 Machines. Load Balancing: Greedy Scheduling
Approximation Algorithms Chapter Approximation Algorithms Q. Suppose I need to solve an NPhard problem. What should I do? A. Theory says you're unlikely to find a polytime algorithm. Must sacrifice one
More informationDetermination of the normalization level of database schemas through equivalence classes of attributes
Computer Science Journal of Moldova, vol.17, no.2(50), 2009 Determination of the normalization level of database schemas through equivalence classes of attributes Cotelea Vitalie Abstract In this paper,
More informationGood luck, veel succes!
Final exam Advanced Linear Programming, May 7, 13.0016.00 Switch off your mobile phone, PDA and any other mobile device and put it far away. No books or other reading materials are allowed. This exam
More informationARTICLE IN PRESS. European Journal of Operational Research xxx (2004) xxx xxx. Discrete Optimization. Nan Kong, Andrew J.
A factor 1 European Journal of Operational Research xxx (00) xxx xxx Discrete Optimization approximation algorithm for twostage stochastic matching problems Nan Kong, Andrew J. Schaefer * Department of
More information3. Linear Programming and Polyhedral Combinatorics
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Handout 6 18.433: Combinatorial Optimization February 20th, 2009 Michel X. Goemans 3. Linear Programming and Polyhedral Combinatorics Summary of what was seen in the
More informationCycles in a Graph Whose Lengths Differ by One or Two
Cycles in a Graph Whose Lengths Differ by One or Two J. A. Bondy 1 and A. Vince 2 1 LABORATOIRE DE MATHÉMATIQUES DISCRÉTES UNIVERSITÉ CLAUDEBERNARD LYON 1 69622 VILLEURBANNE, FRANCE 2 DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS
More informationLecture 7: Approximation via Randomized Rounding
Lecture 7: Approximation via Randomized Rounding Often LPs return a fractional solution where the solution x, which is supposed to be in {0, } n, is in [0, ] n instead. There is a generic way of obtaining
More information! Solve problem to optimality. ! Solve problem in polytime. ! Solve arbitrary instances of the problem. !approximation algorithm.
Approximation Algorithms Chapter Approximation Algorithms Q Suppose I need to solve an NPhard problem What should I do? A Theory says you're unlikely to find a polytime algorithm Must sacrifice one of
More information1 if 1 x 0 1 if 0 x 1
Chapter 3 Continuity In this chapter we begin by defining the fundamental notion of continuity for real valued functions of a single real variable. When trying to decide whether a given function is or
More informationApplied Algorithm Design Lecture 5
Applied Algorithm Design Lecture 5 Pietro Michiardi Eurecom Pietro Michiardi (Eurecom) Applied Algorithm Design Lecture 5 1 / 86 Approximation Algorithms Pietro Michiardi (Eurecom) Applied Algorithm Design
More informationLecture 3: Linear Programming Relaxations and Rounding
Lecture 3: Linear Programming Relaxations and Rounding 1 Approximation Algorithms and Linear Relaxations For the time being, suppose we have a minimization problem. Many times, the problem at hand can
More informationWhy? A central concept in Computer Science. Algorithms are ubiquitous.
Analysis of Algorithms: A Brief Introduction Why? A central concept in Computer Science. Algorithms are ubiquitous. Using the Internet (sending email, transferring files, use of search engines, online
More informationDefinition 11.1. Given a graph G on n vertices, we define the following quantities:
Lecture 11 The Lovász ϑ Function 11.1 Perfect graphs We begin with some background on perfect graphs. graphs. First, we define some quantities on Definition 11.1. Given a graph G on n vertices, we define
More informationOn Integer Additive SetIndexers of Graphs
On Integer Additive SetIndexers of Graphs arxiv:1312.7672v4 [math.co] 2 Mar 2014 N K Sudev and K A Germina Abstract A setindexer of a graph G is an injective setvalued function f : V (G) 2 X such that
More informationCS 598CSC: Combinatorial Optimization Lecture date: 2/4/2010
CS 598CSC: Combinatorial Optimization Lecture date: /4/010 Instructor: Chandra Chekuri Scribe: David Morrison GomoryHu Trees (The work in this section closely follows [3]) Let G = (V, E) be an undirected
More informationFairness in Routing and Load Balancing
Fairness in Routing and Load Balancing Jon Kleinberg Yuval Rabani Éva Tardos Abstract We consider the issue of network routing subject to explicit fairness conditions. The optimization of fairness criteria
More informationLecture 15 An Arithmetic Circuit Lowerbound and Flows in Graphs
CSE599s: Extremal Combinatorics November 21, 2011 Lecture 15 An Arithmetic Circuit Lowerbound and Flows in Graphs Lecturer: Anup Rao 1 An Arithmetic Circuit Lower Bound An arithmetic circuit is just like
More information2.3 Convex Constrained Optimization Problems
42 CHAPTER 2. FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS IN CONVEX OPTIMIZATION Theorem 15 Let f : R n R and h : R R. Consider g(x) = h(f(x)) for all x R n. The function g is convex if either of the following two conditions
More informationUniform Multicommodity Flow through the Complete Graph with Random Edgecapacities
Combinatorics, Probability and Computing (2005) 00, 000 000. c 2005 Cambridge University Press DOI: 10.1017/S0000000000000000 Printed in the United Kingdom Uniform Multicommodity Flow through the Complete
More informationLabeling outerplanar graphs with maximum degree three
Labeling outerplanar graphs with maximum degree three Xiangwen Li 1 and Sanming Zhou 2 1 Department of Mathematics Huazhong Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China 2 Department of Mathematics and Statistics
More informationA simpler and better derandomization of an approximation algorithm for Single Source RentorBuy
A simpler and better derandomization of an approximation algorithm for Single Source RentorBuy David P. Williamson Anke van Zuylen School of Operations Research and Industrial Engineering, Cornell University,
More information1 Polyhedra and Linear Programming
CS 598CSC: Combinatorial Optimization Lecture date: January 21, 2009 Instructor: Chandra Chekuri Scribe: Sungjin Im 1 Polyhedra and Linear Programming In this lecture, we will cover some basic material
More informationA note on properties for a complementary graph and its tree graph
A note on properties for a complementary graph and its tree graph Abulimiti Yiming Department of Mathematics Institute of Mathematics & Informations Xinjiang Normal University China Masami Yasuda Department
More informationprinceton univ. F 13 cos 521: Advanced Algorithm Design Lecture 6: Provable Approximation via Linear Programming Lecturer: Sanjeev Arora
princeton univ. F 13 cos 521: Advanced Algorithm Design Lecture 6: Provable Approximation via Linear Programming Lecturer: Sanjeev Arora Scribe: One of the running themes in this course is the notion of
More informationStationary random graphs on Z with prescribed iid degrees and finite mean connections
Stationary random graphs on Z with prescribed iid degrees and finite mean connections Maria Deijfen Johan Jonasson February 2006 Abstract Let F be a probability distribution with support on the nonnegative
More informationOn the kpath cover problem for cacti
On the kpath cover problem for cacti Zemin Jin and Xueliang Li Center for Combinatorics and LPMC Nankai University Tianjin 300071, P.R. China zeminjin@eyou.com, x.li@eyou.com Abstract In this paper we
More informationMathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces
Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces D. R. Wilkins Academic Year 19967 9 Vector Spaces A vector space over some field K is an algebraic structure consisting of a set V on which are
More informationFinding and counting given length cycles
Finding and counting given length cycles Noga Alon Raphael Yuster Uri Zwick Abstract We present an assortment of methods for finding and counting simple cycles of a given length in directed and undirected
More information1. R In this and the next section we are going to study the properties of sequences of real numbers.
+a 1. R In this and the next section we are going to study the properties of sequences of real numbers. Definition 1.1. (Sequence) A sequence is a function with domain N. Example 1.2. A sequence of real
More informationmax cx s.t. Ax c where the matrix A, cost vector c and right hand side b are given and x is a vector of variables. For this example we have x
Linear Programming Linear programming refers to problems stated as maximization or minimization of a linear function subject to constraints that are linear equalities and inequalities. Although the study
More informationLinear Programming. Widget Factory Example. Linear Programming: Standard Form. Widget Factory Example: Continued.
Linear Programming Widget Factory Example Learning Goals. Introduce Linear Programming Problems. Widget Example, Graphical Solution. Basic Theory:, Vertices, Existence of Solutions. Equivalent formulations.
More informationIntroduction to Flocking {Stochastic Matrices}
Supelec EECI Graduate School in Control Introduction to Flocking {Stochastic Matrices} A. S. Morse Yale University Gif sur  Yvette May 21, 2012 CRAIG REYNOLDS  1987 BOIDS The Lion King CRAIG REYNOLDS
More informationLarge induced subgraphs with all degrees odd
Large induced subgraphs with all degrees odd A.D. Scott Department of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, University of Cambridge, England Abstract: We prove that every connected graph of order
More informationA Network Flow Approach in Cloud Computing
1 A Network Flow Approach in Cloud Computing Soheil Feizi, Amy Zhang, Muriel Médard RLE at MIT Abstract In this paper, by using network flow principles, we propose algorithms to address various challenges
More informationChapter 15 Introduction to Linear Programming
Chapter 15 Introduction to Linear Programming An Introduction to Optimization Spring, 2014 WeiTa Chu 1 Brief History of Linear Programming The goal of linear programming is to determine the values of
More informationFIND ALL LONGER AND SHORTER BOUNDARY DURATION VECTORS UNDER PROJECT TIME AND BUDGET CONSTRAINTS
Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan Vol. 45, No. 3, September 2002 2002 The Operations Research Society of Japan FIND ALL LONGER AND SHORTER BOUNDARY DURATION VECTORS UNDER PROJECT TIME
More informationEvery tree contains a large induced subgraph with all degrees odd
Every tree contains a large induced subgraph with all degrees odd A.J. Radcliffe Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA A.D. Scott Department of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics University
More informationBasic Notions on Graphs. Planar Graphs and Vertex Colourings. Joe Ryan. Presented by
Basic Notions on Graphs Planar Graphs and Vertex Colourings Presented by Joe Ryan School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of Newcastle, Australia Planar graphs Graphs may be drawn
More informationBicolored Shortest Paths in Graphs with Applications to Network Overlay Design
Bicolored Shortest Paths in Graphs with Applications to Network Overlay Design Hongsik Choi and HyeongAh Choi Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science George Washington University Washington,
More informationPermutation Betting Markets: Singleton Betting with Extra Information
Permutation Betting Markets: Singleton Betting with Extra Information Mohammad Ghodsi Sharif University of Technology ghodsi@sharif.edu Hamid Mahini Sharif University of Technology mahini@ce.sharif.edu
More informationAdaptive Online Gradient Descent
Adaptive Online Gradient Descent Peter L Bartlett Division of Computer Science Department of Statistics UC Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94709 bartlett@csberkeleyedu Elad Hazan IBM Almaden Research Center 650
More informationPh.D. Thesis. Judit NagyGyörgy. Supervisor: Péter Hajnal Associate Professor
Online algorithms for combinatorial problems Ph.D. Thesis by Judit NagyGyörgy Supervisor: Péter Hajnal Associate Professor Doctoral School in Mathematics and Computer Science University of Szeged Bolyai
More informationNo: 10 04. Bilkent University. Monotonic Extension. Farhad Husseinov. Discussion Papers. Department of Economics
No: 10 04 Bilkent University Monotonic Extension Farhad Husseinov Discussion Papers Department of Economics The Discussion Papers of the Department of Economics are intended to make the initial results
More informationAnalysis of Approximation Algorithms for kset Cover using FactorRevealing Linear Programs
Analysis of Approximation Algorithms for kset Cover using FactorRevealing Linear Programs Stavros Athanassopoulos, Ioannis Caragiannis, and Christos Kaklamanis Research Academic Computer Technology Institute
More informationMean RamseyTurán numbers
Mean RamseyTurán numbers Raphael Yuster Department of Mathematics University of Haifa at Oranim Tivon 36006, Israel Abstract A ρmean coloring of a graph is a coloring of the edges such that the average
More informationA simple criterion on degree sequences of graphs
Discrete Applied Mathematics 156 (2008) 3513 3517 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Discrete Applied Mathematics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/dam Note A simple criterion on degree
More informationCOMBINATORIAL PROPERTIES OF THE HIGMANSIMS GRAPH. 1. Introduction
COMBINATORIAL PROPERTIES OF THE HIGMANSIMS GRAPH ZACHARY ABEL 1. Introduction In this survey we discuss properties of the HigmanSims graph, which has 100 vertices, 1100 edges, and is 22 regular. In fact
More informationAll trees contain a large induced subgraph having all degrees 1 (mod k)
All trees contain a large induced subgraph having all degrees 1 (mod k) David M. Berman, A.J. Radcliffe, A.D. Scott, Hong Wang, and Larry Wargo *Department of Mathematics University of New Orleans New
More informationPrime Numbers. Chapter Primes and Composites
Chapter 2 Prime Numbers The term factoring or factorization refers to the process of expressing an integer as the product of two or more integers in a nontrivial way, e.g., 42 = 6 7. Prime numbers are
More informationPartitioning edgecoloured complete graphs into monochromatic cycles and paths
arxiv:1205.5492v1 [math.co] 24 May 2012 Partitioning edgecoloured complete graphs into monochromatic cycles and paths Alexey Pokrovskiy Departement of Mathematics, London School of Economics and Political
More informationMincost flow problems and network simplex algorithm
Mincost flow problems and network simplex algorithm The particular structure of some LP problems can be sometimes used for the design of solution techniques more efficient than the simplex algorithm.
More informationHigh degree graphs contain largestar factors
High degree graphs contain largestar factors Dedicated to László Lovász, for his 60th birthday Noga Alon Nicholas Wormald Abstract We show that any finite simple graph with minimum degree d contains a
More information6. Metric spaces. In this section we review the basic facts about metric spaces. d : X X [0, )
6. Metric spaces In this section we review the basic facts about metric spaces. Definitions. A metric on a nonempty set X is a map with the following properties: d : X X [0, ) (i) If x, y X are points
More informationSemiMatchings for Bipartite Graphs and Load Balancing
SemiMatchings for Bipartite Graphs and Load Balancing Nicholas J. A. Harvey Richard E. Ladner László Lovász Tami Tamir Abstract We consider the problem of fairly matching the lefthand vertices of a bipartite
More informationA REMARK ON ALMOST MOORE DIGRAPHS OF DEGREE THREE. 1. Introduction and Preliminaries
Acta Math. Univ. Comenianae Vol. LXVI, 2(1997), pp. 285 291 285 A REMARK ON ALMOST MOORE DIGRAPHS OF DEGREE THREE E. T. BASKORO, M. MILLER and J. ŠIRÁŇ Abstract. It is well known that Moore digraphs do
More informationThe Goldberg Rao Algorithm for the Maximum Flow Problem
The Goldberg Rao Algorithm for the Maximum Flow Problem COS 528 class notes October 18, 2006 Scribe: Dávid Papp Main idea: use of the blocking flow paradigm to achieve essentially O(min{m 2/3, n 1/2 }
More informationMinimize subject to. x S R
Chapter 12 Lagrangian Relaxation This chapter is mostly inspired by Chapter 16 of [1]. In the previous chapters, we have succeeded to find efficient algorithms to solve several important problems such
More informationThe multiinteger set cover and the facility terminal cover problem
The multiinteger set cover and the facility teral cover problem Dorit S. Hochbaum Asaf Levin December 5, 2007 Abstract The facility teral cover problem is a generalization of the vertex cover problem.
More informationWeek 5 Integral Polyhedra
Week 5 Integral Polyhedra We have seen some examples 1 of linear programming formulation that are integral, meaning that every basic feasible solution is an integral vector. This week we develop a theory
More informationECEN 5682 Theory and Practice of Error Control Codes
ECEN 5682 Theory and Practice of Error Control Codes Convolutional Codes University of Colorado Spring 2007 Linear (n, k) block codes take k data symbols at a time and encode them into n code symbols.
More informationA Sublinear Bipartiteness Tester for Bounded Degree Graphs
A Sublinear Bipartiteness Tester for Bounded Degree Graphs Oded Goldreich Dana Ron February 5, 1998 Abstract We present a sublineartime algorithm for testing whether a bounded degree graph is bipartite
More informationBest Monotone Degree Bounds for Various Graph Parameters
Best Monotone Degree Bounds for Various Graph Parameters D. Bauer Department of Mathematical Sciences Stevens Institute of Technology Hoboken, NJ 07030 S. L. Hakimi Department of Electrical and Computer
More informationPractical Guide to the Simplex Method of Linear Programming
Practical Guide to the Simplex Method of Linear Programming Marcel Oliver Revised: April, 0 The basic steps of the simplex algorithm Step : Write the linear programming problem in standard form Linear
More informationON INDUCED SUBGRAPHS WITH ALL DEGREES ODD. 1. Introduction
ON INDUCED SUBGRAPHS WITH ALL DEGREES ODD A.D. SCOTT Abstract. Gallai proved that the vertex set of any graph can be partitioned into two sets, each inducing a subgraph with all degrees even. We prove
More information3 Does the Simplex Algorithm Work?
Does the Simplex Algorithm Work? In this section we carefully examine the simplex algorithm introduced in the previous chapter. Our goal is to either prove that it works, or to determine those circumstances
More information24. The Branch and Bound Method
24. The Branch and Bound Method It has serious practical consequences if it is known that a combinatorial problem is NPcomplete. Then one can conclude according to the present state of science that no
More informationEnergy Benefit of Network Coding for Multiple Unicast in Wireless Networks
Energy Benefit of Network Coding for Multiple Unicast in Wireless Networks Jasper Goseling IRCTR/CWPC, WMC Group Delft University of Technology The Netherlands j.goseling@tudelft.nl Abstract Jos H. Weber
More informationTrees and Fundamental Circuits
Trees and Fundamental Circuits Tree A connected graph without any circuits. o must have at least one vertex. o definition implies that it must be a simple graph. o only finite trees are being considered
More informationBreaking The Code. Ryan Lowe. Ryan Lowe is currently a Ball State senior with a double major in Computer Science and Mathematics and
Breaking The Code Ryan Lowe Ryan Lowe is currently a Ball State senior with a double major in Computer Science and Mathematics and a minor in Applied Physics. As a sophomore, he took an independent study
More informationNetwork (Tree) Topology Inference Based on Prüfer Sequence
Network (Tree) Topology Inference Based on Prüfer Sequence C. Vanniarajan and Kamala Krithivasan Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Madras Chennai 600036 vanniarajanc@hcl.in,
More informationThe Open University s repository of research publications and other research outputs
Open Research Online The Open University s repository of research publications and other research outputs The degreediameter problem for circulant graphs of degree 8 and 9 Journal Article How to cite:
More informationThe Binary Blocking Flow Algorithm. Andrew V. Goldberg Microsoft Research Silicon Valley www.research.microsoft.com/ goldberg/
The Binary Blocking Flow Algorithm Andrew V. Goldberg Microsoft Research Silicon Valley www.research.microsoft.com/ goldberg/ Theory vs. Practice In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
More informationA. V. Gerbessiotis CS Spring 2014 PS 3 Mar 24, 2014 No points
A. V. Gerbessiotis CS 610102 Spring 2014 PS 3 Mar 24, 2014 No points Problem 1. Suppose that we insert n keys into a hash table of size m using open addressing and uniform hashing. Let p(n, m) be the
More informationDATA ANALYSIS II. Matrix Algorithms
DATA ANALYSIS II Matrix Algorithms Similarity Matrix Given a dataset D = {x i }, i=1,..,n consisting of n points in R d, let A denote the n n symmetric similarity matrix between the points, given as where
More information4.6 Linear Programming duality
4.6 Linear Programming duality To any minimization (maximization) LP we can associate a closely related maximization (minimization) LP. Different spaces and objective functions but in general same optimal
More informationA Turán Type Problem Concerning the Powers of the Degrees of a Graph
A Turán Type Problem Concerning the Powers of the Degrees of a Graph Yair Caro and Raphael Yuster Department of Mathematics University of HaifaORANIM, Tivon 36006, Israel. AMS Subject Classification:
More informationPlanar Tree Transformation: Results and Counterexample
Planar Tree Transformation: Results and Counterexample Selim G Akl, Kamrul Islam, and Henk Meijer School of Computing, Queen s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6 Abstract We consider the problem
More informationSolutions to Exercises 8
Discrete Mathematics Lent 2009 MA210 Solutions to Exercises 8 (1) Suppose that G is a graph in which every vertex has degree at least k, where k 1, and in which every cycle contains at least 4 vertices.
More informationSequences and Convergence in Metric Spaces
Sequences and Convergence in Metric Spaces Definition: A sequence in a set X (a sequence of elements of X) is a function s : N X. We usually denote s(n) by s n, called the nth term of s, and write {s
More informationDegree Hypergroupoids Associated with Hypergraphs
Filomat 8:1 (014), 119 19 DOI 10.98/FIL1401119F Published by Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.rs/filomat Degree Hypergroupoids Associated
More informationProximal mapping via network optimization
L. Vandenberghe EE236C (Spring 234) Proximal mapping via network optimization minimum cut and maximum flow problems parametric minimum cut problem application to proximal mapping Introduction this lecture:
More informationApproximation Algorithms. Scheduling. Approximation algorithms. Scheduling jobs on a single machine
Approximation algorithms Approximation Algorithms Fast. Cheap. Reliable. Choose two. NPhard problems: choose 2 of optimal polynomial time all instances Approximation algorithms. Tradeoff between time
More informationALMOST COMMON PRIORS 1. INTRODUCTION
ALMOST COMMON PRIORS ZIV HELLMAN ABSTRACT. What happens when priors are not common? We introduce a measure for how far a type space is from having a common prior, which we term prior distance. If a type
More informationMATHEMATICAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL REPORTS. An Improved Approximation Algorithm for the Traveling Tournament Problem
MATHEMATICAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL REPORTS An Improved Approximation Algorithm for the Traveling Tournament Problem Daisuke YAMAGUCHI, Shinji IMAHORI, Ryuhei MIYASHIRO, Tomomi MATSUI METR 2009 42 September
More informationGraphs without proper subgraphs of minimum degree 3 and short cycles
Graphs without proper subgraphs of minimum degree 3 and short cycles Lothar Narins, Alexey Pokrovskiy, Tibor Szabó Department of Mathematics, Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany. August 22, 2014 Abstract
More informationCompetitive Analysis of On line Randomized Call Control in Cellular Networks
Competitive Analysis of On line Randomized Call Control in Cellular Networks Ioannis Caragiannis Christos Kaklamanis Evi Papaioannou Abstract In this paper we address an important communication issue arising
More informationA class of online scheduling algorithms to minimize total completion time
A class of online scheduling algorithms to minimize total completion time X. Lu R.A. Sitters L. Stougie Abstract We consider the problem of scheduling jobs online on a single machine and on identical
More informationLecture 7  Linear Programming
COMPSCI 530: Design and Analysis of Algorithms DATE: 09/17/2013 Lecturer: Debmalya Panigrahi Lecture 7  Linear Programming Scribe: Hieu Bui 1 Overview In this lecture, we cover basics of linear programming,
More informationOn the Union of Arithmetic Progressions
On the Union of Arithmetic Progressions Shoni Gilboa Rom Pinchasi August, 04 Abstract We show that for any integer n and real ɛ > 0, the union of n arithmetic progressions with pairwise distinct differences,
More informationChapter 2 Limits Functions and Sequences sequence sequence Example
Chapter Limits In the net few chapters we shall investigate several concepts from calculus, all of which are based on the notion of a limit. In the normal sequence of mathematics courses that students
More informationCourse 421: Algebraic Topology Section 1: Topological Spaces
Course 421: Algebraic Topology Section 1: Topological Spaces David R. Wilkins Copyright c David R. Wilkins 1988 2008 Contents 1 Topological Spaces 1 1.1 Continuity and Topological Spaces...............
More informationAnalysis of Algorithms, I
Analysis of Algorithms, I CSOR W4231.002 Eleni Drinea Computer Science Department Columbia University Thursday, February 26, 2015 Outline 1 Recap 2 Representing graphs 3 Breadthfirst search (BFS) 4 Applications
More information1 Introduction. Dr. T. Srinivas Department of Mathematics Kakatiya University Warangal 506009, AP, INDIA tsrinivasku@gmail.com
A New Allgoriitthm for Miiniimum Costt Liinkiing M. Sreenivas Alluri Institute of Management Sciences Hanamkonda 506001, AP, INDIA allurimaster@gmail.com Dr. T. Srinivas Department of Mathematics Kakatiya
More informationHomework MA 725 Spring, 2012 C. Huneke SELECTED ANSWERS
Homework MA 725 Spring, 2012 C. Huneke SELECTED ANSWERS 1.1.25 Prove that the Petersen graph has no cycle of length 7. Solution: There are 10 vertices in the Petersen graph G. Assume there is a cycle C
More information