B Cohen SOA. Inhibition of Return IOR Posner Cohen. Stimulus Onset Asynchrony SOA 300ms SOA 1,2

Transcription

1 ~209 Advances in Psychological Science * 1, B SOA 20 Inhibition of ReturnIOR 1984 Posner Cohen [1] [4] [5,6] Stimulus Onset AsynchronySOA 300ms SOA IOR Posner Cohen * ( 01JAZJDXLX002) baoyan@pku.edu.cn [2,3] [7] 204

2 Posner Cohen1984 Pratt Abram 1995 [11] IOR Maylor1985 Maylor [8] Posner Cohen [9] Maylor Hockey Pratt Abram [10] Pratt Abram Tipper [12]

3 Pratt Abram Tipper 2 4 Danziger [16] Abram Pratt [13] Tipper 1996 Dodd [17] 2003 Tipper 50ms 500ms [14] Abram Pratt 1998 Danziger [15] 1996 Abram Pratt Snyder Kingstone 2001 Danziger 0123 Danziger

4 Wright Richard1996 [18] Posner Cohen 2 Wright Richard Wright Richard [14] 4 3 Pratt Abram Abram Pratt Wright Richard SOA [19] Wright Richard [20] 1996 Abram 8 Pratt

5 [19] Maylor Hockey 1995 Pratt Abram [10,21] Abram Pratt

6 [11] Pratt J, Abrams R A. Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 1995, 21(6): 1343~1353 [12] Tipper S P, Weaver B, Watson F L. Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations: Commentary on Pratt [1] Posner M I, Cohen Y. Components of visual orienting. In: Bouma H, Bouwhuis D G (Eds.). Attention and performance X. NJ: Erlbaum, ~556 [2] Lupianez J, Milan E G, Tomay F J, Tudela P. Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later. Perception & Psychophysics, 1997, 59: 1241~1254 and Abrams (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1996, 22: 1289~1293 [13] Abram R A, Pratt J. Spatially diffuse inhibition affects multiple locations: A reply to Tipper, Weaver, and Watson (1996). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, : 1294~1298 [14],.. [3], 2001, 24: 269~272, 2000, 24: 269~272 [4] Abram R A, Dobkin R S. The gap effect and inhibition of return: Interactive effects on eye movement latencies. [15] Danziger S, Kingstone A, Snyder J J. Inhibition of return to successively stimulated locations in a sequential visual search paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Experimental Brain Research, 1994, 98: 483~ 487 Human Perception and Performance, 1998,24(5): [5] Tipper S P, Driver J, Weaver B. Object-centered inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1991, 43: 289~298 [6] Tipper S P, Weaver B, Jerreat L, Burak A. Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1994, 20: 478~ ~1475 [16] Snyder J J, Kingstone A. Inhibition of return at multiple locations in visual search: When you see it and when you don t. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2001, 54(4): 1221~1237 [17] Dodd M, Castel A, Pratt J. Inhibition of return occurs with multiple shifts of attention: Evidence supporting the limited [7],. role of memory in visual search. Perception &., 1999, 31(3): 241~248 [8] Maylor E. Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In: Posner M I, Marin O S M (Eds.). Attention and Performance XI. NJ: Erlbaum, ~203 [9] Wright R D. Shifts of visual attention to multiple Psychophysics, 2003, 65: 1126~1135 [18] Wright R D, Richard C M. Inhibition of return at multiple location in visual space. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1996, 50 (3): 324~327 [19] Bao Y, Zhou J, Fu L. Aging and the time course of inhibition of return in a static environment. Acta Neurobiologiae simultaneous location cues. Canadian Journal of Experimentalis, 2004, 64: 403~414 Experimental Psychology, 1994, 48: 205~217 [10] Maylor E, Hockey R. Inhibitory components of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. Journal of [20],,.., 2004, 3: 1~5 [21] Bennett P J, Pratt J. The spatial distribution of inhibition of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and return. Psychological Science, 2001, 12 (1): 76~80 Performance, 1985, 11: 777~787 Studies on the Capacity of Inhibition of Return Bao Yan 1, 2 Hu Kesong 1 Xiao Xiaoxi 1 ( 1 Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing , China) ( 2 Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing , China) AbstractInhibition of Return refers to the delayed response times to targets presented at the previously attended locations or objects as compared to the novel ones. It has been considered as a mechanism that biases attention towards novel locations in the visual field so as to facilitate visual searching efficiency. Since mid-1990 s, more and more studies in this field have focused on exploring the capacity of inhibition of return, i.e., how many previously cued locations can be inhibited by this mechanism. This article provides an overall review on the studies of inhibition of return at multiple locations with two major research paradigms -- the sequential cueing and simultaneous cueing paradigms. It summarizes the achievements as well as the characteristics and problems in this field and points out the possible direction for future research. Key wordsattention, inhibition of return, cueing, capacity.