Capital Infrastructure Committee Cycle 2 Wednesday, December 2, :30 a.m. 1:00 p.m. Cairns 207

Transcription

1 Board of Trustees Capital Infrastructure Committee Cycle 2 Wednesday, December 2, :30 a.m. 1:00 p.m. Cairns 207 Agenda # Item By Start Time Length Action 1. Call to Order KF 10: Declaration of Conflict of Interest KF 10: Approval of Agenda (including consent items) KF 10:32 1 Approval 4. Minutes of Previous Meeting Meeting #1 ( )held on September 30, 2015 KF 10:33 1 Approval 5. Business Arising from the Minutes KF 10:34 1 KEY ITEMS 6. Campus Plan Update (including Appendices 1-2) 7. Fiscal Framework A Closer Look at Capital & Related Projects (including Appendix 1) 8. Five Year Long Term Capital Plan (including Appendices 1-3) Capital and Related Project Budget (including Appendices 1-2) 10. Q2 Financial Update on Capital and Related Projects Plan (including Appendix 1) 11. Goodman School of Business Rendering (including Appendices 1-2) TSI 10:35 45 Information BB 11:20 10 Information DC/TSI 11:30 5 Information DC/TSI 11:35 20 Decision TSI 11:55 5 Decision TSI 12:00 10 Decision COMMITTEE BREAK 12: Schmon Tower Student Services Atrium Project Architect Procurement & Pre-Design Phase (including Appendix 1) TA/TSI 12:15 5 Information 13. Residence Facility Condition Index (including Appendices 1-3) TA/TSI 12:20 10 Information 14. Hamilton Campus (including Appendices 1-2) BH 12:30 10 Information 15. New Accounting System Project Phoenix (including Appendix 1) BB 12:40 5 Information

2 # Item By Start Time Length Action 16. Capital Infrastructure Goal Progress Scorecard BH 12:45 5 Information CONSENT ITEMS 12:50 5 (if needed) 17. Major Projects Update ITS (including Appendices 1-6) DC Information 18. IT Governance DC Information 19. Major Projects Update FM (including Appendices 1-5) 20. Cairns Family Health & Bioscience Research Complex (CFHBRC) Post-Occupancy Evaluation Follow-up (including Appendices 1-2) 21. Computerized Facility Management System (CFMS) TSI TSI TSI Information Information Information 22. Residence and Parking Master Plans UPDATE TA Information 23. Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) Update (including Appendix 1) GA Information CONSENT ITEMS (IN CAMERA) 12:55 5 (if needed) 24. Record of IN CAMERA session of Previous Meeting Meeting #1 ( ) held on September 30, 2015 (IN CAMERA) KF Approval 25. Other Business KF 1: ADJOURNMENT KF DEBRIEFING SESSION: Committee members and guests are invited by the Chair to attend debriefing sessions in the meeting room as follows; a) Committee members, including the President and Vice Presidents b) Committee members, including the President c) Committee members, excluding the President Agenda Legend BB - Bryan Boles KF - Kristine Freudenthaler BH - Brian Hutchings TA - Tom Arkell DC - David Cullum TSI - Tom Saint-Ivany GA - Grant Armstrong Page 2 of 2

3 (Circulated Prior to Approval) Board of Trustees Brock University Niagara Region 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1 Canada MINUTES OF MEETING #1 ( ) CAPITAL INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2015, 10:30 AM CAIRNS FAMILY HEALTH AND BIOSCIENCE RESEARCH COMPLEX, ROOM 207 PRESENT: Ms. Kristine Freudenthaler (Chair), Mr. Jeffrey Cairns (Vice-Chair), Mr. Mark Arthur, Ms. Michele-Elise Burnett, Mr. Trevor Cooper, Ms. Gloria Gallagher, Dr. Scott Henderson, Mr. Marco Marrone, Mr. Joe Robertson, Mr. Peter Stoyanov, Mr. John Suk RESOURCE PERSONNEL: Mr. Bryan Boles, Mr. David Cullum, Mr. Brian Hutchings, Dr. Gary Libben, Dr. Neil McCartney, Mr. Roland Mech, Mr. Tom Saint-Ivany, Ms. Margaret Thompson, Ms. Angela Magro (Recorder) By invitation: Ms. Donna Moody and Mr. Rick Fraser (Item 8), Ms. Karen Epp (Items 9 and 10) Mr. Tom Arkell (Items 11 and 23) Ms. Wendy Laslo and Mr. James Fleming (Item 11) Ms. Janis Barlow, Mr. Peter Partridge and Mr. Stuart Reid (Item 22) ALSO PRESENT: REGRETS: Faculty Deans: Dr. S. Ejaz Ahmed Mr. Nick DiPietro, Dr. Jack Lightstone 1. Call to Order Ms. Freudenthaler welcomed members, staff and guests and called the meeting to order. The Chair extended an additional welcome to new Trustees serving on the Committee and recognized Management for the successful opening of the Marilyn I. Walker School of Fine and Performing Arts. 2. Declaration of Conflict of Interest There were no conflicts of interest declared to any matter on the Agenda. 3. Approval of Agenda The Chair confirmed that there were no items to be lifted from the consent agenda portion of the meeting Agenda.

4 Minutes of the Capital Infrastructure Committee Meeting September 30, On a motion by Mr. Marrone, seconded by Ms. Gallagher and carried, it was RESOLVED that the Agenda, including consent items be approved. 4. Minutes of the Previous Meeting [The Minutes of Meeting #5 ( ) of the Capital Infrastructure Committee held on June 24, 2015 had been posted with the meeting materials.] On a motion by Mr. Marrone, seconded by Mr. Suk and carried, it was RESOLVED that the Minutes of Meeting #5 ( ) of the Capital Infrastructure Committee held on June 24, 2015 be approved. 5. Business Arising from the Minutes None 6. Capital Infrastructure Committee Goal Progress Scorecard [An Information Item TOPIC: Capital Infrastructure Committee Goals and Objectives Progress Scorecard, dated September 30, 2015 had been posted with the meeting materials.] The Committee received the Capital Infrastructure Committee Goals and Objectives Progress Scorecard for information. Mr. Hutchings provided an overview of the Scorecard and noted that metrics will be incorporated into the next draft of the Scorecard. 7. Accounting System Scorecard [An Information Item TOPIC: Accounting System Scorecard dated September 30, 2015 together with Appendix 1: Accounting System Scorecard, had been posted with the meeting materials.] The Committee received the template of the Accounting System Scorecard for information. 8. Brock University Campus Security Services Annual Report [An Information Item TOPIC: Brock University Campus Security Services Annual Report dated September 30, 2015 together with Appendix 1: Brock University 2014 Annual Report Campus Security Services, had been posted with the meeting materials.] Ms. Moody provided an overview of the Campus Security Services Annual Report. She highlighted certain areas of the Report, noting the recent infrastructure developments in the department relating to the incident management software and a new social media communications initiative. During discussion, Ms. Moody and Mr. Fraser responded to all questions from members. 9. Long Term Capital Plan (LTCP) Update [An Information Item TOPIC: Long Term Capital Plan Update dated September 30, 2015 together with Appendix 1: Fiscal Year 2016/2017 Long Term Capital Planning Targets; Appendix 2: Fiscal Year 2016/2017 LTCP Budget Development; Appendix 3: Fiscal Year 2016/2017 LTCP Forecast; and Appendix 4: LTCP Funding Summary and Future Year Targets, had been posted with the meeting materials.]

5 Minutes of the Capital Infrastructure Committee Meeting September 30, Mr. Saint-Ivany provided an overview of the Report and corresponding appendices that contained detailed information regarding the Long Term Capital Plan. Management responded to all questions from the Committee and received feedback regarding potentially including classroom modernization in the Long Term Capital Plan. The Chair suggested that Management provide a one-page summary to enable further discussion by the Committee at the December 2015 meeting. 10. Q1 Financial Update on Capital and Related Projects [A Decision Item TOPIC: Q1 Financial Update on Capital and Related Projects dated September 30, 2015, together with Appendix 1: 2014/15 and 2015/16 LTCP Q1 Status Report as at August 5, 2015 had been posted with the meeting materials.] The Committee reviewed the Report which contained the background information for the proposed motion. During discussion, Management responded to questions related to the capital requirements as outlined in the Report. On a motion by Ms. Freudenthaler, seconded by Ms. Gallagher, and carried, it was RESOLVED that the Capital Infrastructure Committee approve the inclusion of the additional capital and related requirements, identified in Management s Fiscal Year 2014/15 and Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Long Term Capital Plans: Q1 Financial Update on Capital and Related Projects, into the Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Long Term Capital Plan. 11. Residence and Parking Master Plans [An Information Item TOPIC: Residence and Parking Master Plans dated September 30, 2015, had been posted with the meeting materials.] Management provided an overview of the residence master plan followed by an overview of the parking master plan. A discussion ensued regarding the University s current and potential residence and parking facilities during which Members provided feedback to Management. The Chair suggested it may be beneficial for comparative information on residence and parking facilities to be documented in a fact sheet for future presentation to the Committee. 12. Draft Delegation of Authority Policy [An Information Item TOPIC: Draft Delegation of Authority Policy, dated September 30, 2015, together with Appendix 1: Report to the Financial Planning and Investment Committee on Draft Delegation of Authority Policy, had been posted with the meeting materials.]

6 Minutes of the Capital Infrastructure Committee Meeting September 30, Management provided an overview of the draft Delegation of Authority Policy, noting its importance in ensuring appropriate levels of control and accountability in transactions that bind the University while enabling projects to be undertaken in a timely fashion. Members were encouraged to continue to provide feedback to Management. Following a consultative process, the Policy will be considered during a future Board cycle. Consent Items: The following Items had been received by consent: 13. Major Projects Update Information Technology Services (ITS) [An Information Item TOPIC: Major Projects Update ITS dated September 30, 2015 together with Appendix 1: Cloud Initiatives Office 365 for students; Appendix 2: PaperCut Centralized Print Accounting; Appendix 3: Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards Compliance; Appendix 4: SharePoint Document Management; Appendix 5: Wireless Expansion Phase; and Appendix 6: Evergreening Program, had been posted with the meeting materials.] 14. Information Technology Services (ITS) Policy Update [An Information Item TOPIC: ITS Policy Update dated September 30, 2015 had been posted with the meeting materials.] 15. Major Projects Update Facilities Management (FM) [An Information Item TOPIC: Major Projects Update - FM dated September 30, 2015 together with Appendix 1: Marilyn I. Walker School of Fine and Performing Arts (MIWSFPA); Appendix 2: Artificial Turf Field; Appendix 3: Goodman School of Business Building; Appendix 4: Mackenzie Chown Complex Fire Alarm Replacement; and Appendix 5: Post- MIWSFPA Moves/Renovations, had been posted with the meeting materials.] 16. Deferred Maintenance Update [An Information Item TOPIC: Deferred Maintenance Update dated September 30, 2015 together with Appendix 1: Fiscal Year 2014/2015 and Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Q1 Deferred Maintenance Project Status Report and Appendix 2: Facility Condition Audit Cycle / VFA Database Update, had been posted with the meeting materials.] 17. Department of Facilities Management Introductory Information [An Information Item TOPIC: Department of Facilities Management Introductory Information dated September 30, 2015 together with Appendix 1: Organization Chart; Appendix 2: Co-generation Plant; Appendix 3: Main Campus District Distribution of Electrical Services; Appendix 4: Facilities Management Metrics; and Appendix 5: Brock University Buildings, had been posted with the meeting materials.] 18. Department of Information Technology Services (ITS) Introductory Information [An Information Item TOPIC: Department of Information Technology Services dated September 30, 2015 together with Appendix 1: ITS Organizational Structure and Appendix 2: Evolution of ITS, had been posted with the meeting materials.]

7 Minutes of the Capital Infrastructure Committee Meeting September 30, Department of University Services Introductory Information [An Information Item TOPIC: Department of University Services Introductory Information dated September 30, 2015 together with Appendix 1: University Services Organizational Chart; Appendix 2: Departmental Descriptions; Appendix 3: Budgets with further detail; and Appendix 4: CBC News related article, had been posted with the meeting materials.] 20. St. David s Road West Name Change [An Information Item TOPIC: St. David s Road West Name Change dated September 30, 2015 had been posted with the meeting materials.] The Chair noted that a motion was required to move in camera for consideration of the following Agenda Items: 21. Record of the In Camera Session of Meeting #5 ( ) held on June 24, 2015 In camera 22. Rodman Hall In camera 23. Schmon Tower Student Services Atrium Project and Architect Procurement - In camera 24. Goodman School of Business - In camera On a motion by Mr. Suk, seconded by Mr. Cairns and carried, the Committee moved in camera at 12:04 p.m. Only members of the Committee and those invited staff remained for the closed session. ***** [During closed session, confidential Reports were reviewed and confidential motions were passed related to Agenda Items 22 and 23] The Committee resumed open session at 1:06 p.m. 25. Other Business None 26. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 1:06 p.m.

8 Board of Trustees Report to the Capital Infrastructure Committee Information Item TOPIC: Campus Plan Update December 2, 2015 Tom Saint-Ivany, Associate Vice-President, Facilities Management Roland Mech, Interim Director, Campus Planning, Design & Construction Services BACKGROUND The update of the 2003 Campus Plan, which is a goal of the Capital Infrastructure Committee, is underway and will be finalized January It is supportive of the University s Integrated Strategic Plan and the Strategic Mandate Agreement with the Province of Ontario and is providing for the appropriate stakeholder input and oversight during its development. The Campus Plan Update will be aligned with current strategic directions and guidance, reflecting future development potential and opportunities. Urban Strategies Inc., the company that prepared the 2003 Campus Plan and the 2006 Facility Needs & Priorities Study (i.e. the space plan), is undertaking the Campus Plan Update. CAMPUS PLAN KEY DIRECTIONS The following are the key directions for the Campus Plan: Expand and Renew the Core Improve and Integrate the East Campus Renew Facilities Renew the Campus Setting Improve Movement and Connections Integrate with the Surrounding City Create Partnership Opportunities CAMPUS PLAN UPDATE ACTIVITIES COMPLETED AND UP-COMING Subsequent to Management s report and presentation, with Urban Strategies, to the June 24, 2015 Capital Infrastructure Committee (CIC), representatives from Urban Strategies conducted a Visioning Workshop on July 29, 2015 with internal and external stakeholders and held a Campus Open House on September 16 th, 2015 with the University community. The Open House presented the project s background, campus planning principals, key physical directions and the preliminary planning framework. Approximately 75 attendees participated from the University 1/2

9 and surrounding community. The following points reflect the Open House participant s feedback and key themes: The future of East Campus Pedestrian crossing at Glenridge Services and amenities in the Campus Core Relationship to natural setting Pedestrian and bicycle connectivity Student residence experience Transit Mall Continued need for parking University representatives participated in a meeting October 27 th with Regional Municipality of Niagara staff to discuss exchange understandings regarding the alignment and opportunities afforded by the preparation of the Region s Brock District Plan and its convergence in time with the University s Campus Plan Update. Discussion included streetscape, opportunities for district energy production and delivery, and ensuring coordinated boundaries on mapping. At the time of writing this report, University representatives have been invited to participate in a presentation November 25 th to the Region s Planning and Development Committee on the Region s Brock District Plan and the University s Campus Plan Update. The University community will be able to view and provide feedback on Draft Campus Plan Update through a second Open House to be held on December 7, Remaining Campus Plan Update milestone dates are outlined at Appendix 1. DRAFT CAMPUS PLAN UPDATE PRESENTATION At the Cycle 2 CIC December 2, 2015 Committee meeting, representatives from Urban Strategies will be presenting the Draft Campus Plan Update. Time has been allowed for substantive discussion afterwards. Their presentation will be provided as Appendix 2 on November 27 th. NEXT STEPS Acceptance of the Campus Plan Update. Management will receive the Campus Plan Update by January 8 th and will seek endorsement of it from Senior Administrative Council at its January 11 th meeting. As coordinated with the CIC Chair, a special meeting of the CIC and the Executive Committee of the Board of Trustees is anticipated to be called for the latter half of January 2016 to receive and accept the Campus Plan Update. Post-Campus Plan Update. The Campus Plan Update will guide and inform the undertaking of the Facility Needs & Priorities Study Update in 2016 with the principal purpose of producing a much needed multi-year space plan for the University; whereby those space needs can, in turn, be progressively planned for and delivered on by the Long Term Capital Plan (LTCP). APPENDICES Appendix 1 - Campus Plan Update - Remaining Milestone Dates (1 page) Appendix 2 Draft Campus Plan Open House Presentation (20 pages) 2/2

10 Campus Plan Update Remaining Milestone Dates November Wednesday, November 25 th - Presentation on the Preliminary Campus Plan Update at the Regional Municipality of Niagara s Planning & Development Committee Thursday, November 26 th Campus Plan Update Steering Committee Meeting #6 Receive Draft Campus Plan Update December Wednesday, December 2 nd Presentation & Discussion of the Draft Campus Plan Update at the Cycle #2 Capital Infrastructure Committee Meeting (Board of Trustees) Monday, December 7 th Presentation & Discussion of the Draft Campus Plan Update at the Senior Administrative Council Meeting Monday, December 7 th Open House #2 on the Draft Campus Plan Update Wednesday, December 9 th Presentation & Discussion of the Draft Campus Plan Update at the Senate Information Technology and Infrastructure Committee Meeting Week of December 14 th Campus Plan Update Steering Committee Meeting #7 Discuss Review of and Feedback on the Draft Campus Plan Update January Friday, January 8 th Receive Finalized Campus Plan Update Report Monday, January 11 th Submit the Campus Plan Update to the Senior Administrative Council Meeting January Submit the Campus Plan Update to the Capital Infrastructure Committee and the Executive Committee of the Board of Trustees at a Special Meeting(s)

11 Capital Infrastructure Committee TOPIC: Campus Plan Update December 2, 2015 Appendix 2 Welcome to the Brock University Campus Plan Open House We want your input! The objective for today s open house is to share our directions and hear your feedback regarding the Draft Campus Plan. Members of the consultant team are on hand to listen to your thoughts and answer any questions. December 7, 2015

12 Project Overview Welcome to the second Open House for Brock University s Campus Plan Update. This Open House will give you an opportunity to learn more about the planning process, review the vision and comprehensive framework for the future of the campus and provide feedback. evolution. The planning process allows for a re-examination of the framework and directions for physical experience for students, staff, faculty and the Niagara community. Campus Project Team The campus planning process is guided by the Campus Plan Steering Committee, consisting of The consultant team appointed to the project provided a variety of expertise, as well as past experience How to Read These Panels draft Campus Plan vision and framework. Panels 1-3 Introduce and provide the context of the study. Panels 4-6: Outline the planning principles, key directions and place-making moves that guide the Campus Plan. Panels 7-14: Describe the campus systems, including land use, movement, open space and utilities. Panel 15-18: Campus Plan - Study Area Illustrate the Near-Term and Long-Term Demonstration Plans and provide an overview of the Precinct Plans. EAST LAND RESERVE 1 Urban Strategies (Project lead) - Planning, urban design and landscape design MMM Group - Transportation planning Amec Foster Wheeler LOCKHART DRIVE LAND RESERVE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY Project Timeline period, ending in early NIAGARA ESCARPMENT MAIN CAMPUS GLENRIDGE AVE Merrittville Hwy Glenridge Ave EAST CAMPUS JOHN MACDONELL ST SIR ISAAC BROCK WAY St. David s Rd Spring 2015 Summer 2015 Fall 2015 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Project Scoping Analysis Visioning Draft Plan Final Plan SOUTH CAMPUS MERRITVILLE HIGHWAY 406 Steering Committee Coordination Key Stakeholder Interviews Visioning Workshop Open House #1 Open House #2 We are here 500 m Brock University Campus Plan Open House DRAFT

13 The Planning Process It has been more than a decade since the completion of the 2003 Campus Plan. As the University continues to evolve, this update to the Campus Plan is needed to guide the next phase of campus change and respond to emerging needs and opportunities. Accordingly, the Campus Plan: Reviews major strategies and initiatives of the 2003 Campus Plan to ensure they align with the future Responds to the evolving demographic, economic and pedagogical climates and context that the Will inform future initiatives, including the Parking Study and Residential Master Plan. Brock University s Strategic Mandate Agreement Brock University s Strategic Mandate Agreement with the Province of Ontario envisions the University as a dynamic postsecondary educational institution and sets out three priority objectives: Establishing transdisciplinary research hubs and developing new graduate and undergraduate 3. creativity. From a physical planning perspective, this means that the Campus Plan must: group learning spaces, and shared amenities Provide the setting to support your evolving academic community Identify development opportunities and related infrastructure to support emerging partnership initiatives University s strategic priorities with external opportunities in order to achieve Brock s Strategic Mandate Agreement while addressing the emerging needs and opportunities. 2 Stakeholder Interviews, Visioning Workshop & Open Houses Plan, which are presented on the following panels. The emerging directions were also shared with the engaged with participants and received feedback on the emerging directions. University Strategic Priorities & Needs City Building Opportunities Brock University Campus Plan Open House DRAFT

14 The Campus Today Brock University will encounter many opportunities and challenges over the coming decades. Guided by this Plan, the University will be positioned to positively respond to these challenges and opportunities in a way that supports the academic mission and promotes the evolution and growth of campus. Key Opportunities and Challenges 3 The poor physical conditions of a number of buildings on campus provides opportunities for transformative facility renewal projects. connections to and around campus require further investment. The emergence of East Campus as academic cluster and centre of a growing student residential area presents an excellent opportunity to leverage the high- cultural hub in the Niagara Region. As the owner of has an opportunity to shape and inform the long-term evolution of this important regional mixed-use node. Brock University Campus Plan Open House DRAFT The campus s unique natural setting sets the campus apart from other institutions. partnerships provides an opportunity to support community engagement and deliver new campus infrastructure by working with municipalities, neighbours and other stakeholders.

15 Campus Planning Principles 4 The campus planning principles are broad-based and mutually supportive to provide comprehensive direction for Campus Plan and offer a means for evaluating future projects and amendments to the Campus Plan. The principles build on those of the 2003 Campus Administrative Council. 1. Support Brock University s academic mission Align campus planning decisions with academic and strategic planning Create a supportive environment for transdisciplinary and interdisciplinary learning 2. Enhance the campus experience Create an environment for student-centred teaching, learning, working, playing and living Expand and enhance social and cultural infrastructure to ensure vibrant campus life and support learning Pursue design excellence in new development, renovation and place-making initiatives areas Extend the high-quality campus experience to campus areas Ensure a safe and welcoming campus environment for all users Preserve and enhance legacy buildings and settings 3. Engage and integrate with the community Engage in integrated, cooperative and transformative planning for campus lands with provincial, municipal and community partners Create a supportive environment for partnership opportunities and development Support the provision of services, facilities and amenities for the campus and surrounding community 4. Support connectivity and accessibility Support the continued reduction in single-occupant vehicle trips and increase pedestrian, bicycle and transit trips Develop a complete network of pedestrian and bicycle connections on and off campus, and support all-season pedestrian connectivity Eliminate physical barriers and pursue universal accessibility environment Pursue the realization of complete streets within the campus and surroundings Enhance connectivity to surrounding lands and region and the Greater Golden Horseshoe 5. Foster sustainability Support the development of a compact, mixed-use campus Prioritize the maintenance, renewal and transformation of existing building assets before new construction Pursue reductions in energy use and emissions through operations, campus renewal and new development making Align campus development with robust and resilient utilities and infrastructure to provide continuous service and access Provide long-term clarity and certainty for campus lands and physical resources Brock University Campus Plan Open House DRAFT

16 Key Directions for the Campus Plan 5 Building on the campus planning principles, the seven key directions provide the foundations of the Campus Plan by University s strategic priorities and needs with broader city building opportunities in order to realize Brock s strategic mandate and engage the surrounding communities. 1. Expand and renew the core As the campus evolves, the university will focus on renewing the campus core to ensure that it continues to be a focal point for learning, amenity space and student services 2. Improve and integrate East Campus The redevelopment of East Campus will create a well-connected mixed-use node that supports activities and amenities for both the university and the community. 3. Renew facilities Continued improvements to instructional and study space are required to respond to institutional needs, declining building conditions and the changing nature of university campuses. 4. Renew the campus setting The campus s structuring landscapes will set the framework for evolution of the campus setting, and and will be the focus of facility renewal, infrastructure investment and new construction. 5. Improve movement and connections The campus circulation and arrival experience will continue to be enhanced through the addition of new pedestrian and cycling connections, the creation of an integrated cycling network, two new campus entrances and a more robust street network. 6. Integrate with the surrounding city Development, landscape and movement improvements at the edges of campus could support community oriented uses, programs and amenities that encourage integration with the surrounding community and make the campus more welcoming. 7. Create partnership opportunities and Merrittville Highway has the greatest potential to accommodate partnership development and new growth. Mixed-use node Open spaces to be improved Major ring roads East-west spine Multi-use trail Campus Core High development potential Brock University Campus Plan Open House DRAFT

17 Key Place-Making Moves 6 Guided by the planning principles and key directions, three place-making moves establish the primary physical intentions of the Campus Plan. Overlaying the place-making moves 1. Strengthen the relationship with to the natural setting assets. At the north and west edge of campus, open space improvements and trail connections will integrate the Niagara Escarpment into the campus fabric. To the south, open space improvement will enhance views of Lake Moodie while contrasting the campus s formal and natural landscapes. The major streetscapes will extend into campus and provide a network of greenways that link the major natural features. 2. Reinforce and connect the campus centres The campus centres represent three important activity nodes Each centre will be provide an iconic place in their respective parts of campus. The emerging centres on East and South Campus will be linked to the campus core by two prominent pedestrian walks that extend the campus setting. 3. Engage with the surrounding city serve as important through streets that extend the city into campus. The land surrounding this important intersection and engage with the city. A complete street network around potential of these lands. Campus structure based on the natural setting and major open spaces Brock University Campus Plan Open House DRAFT Campus structure based on the natural setting and major open spaces, and the centres and walks Campus structure based on the natural setting and major open spaces, centres and walks, and connections to the surrounding city

18 Campus Systems and University Projects 7 Campus Systems The campus systems support the long-term framework for the growth and evolution of campus. The following panels provide detailed direction related to land use and development, landscape and open space, movement and utilities systems. Implementation of these systems will ensure that the vision, principles and key directions of the Plan are upheld as the campus grows and evolves. University Projects Projects are large-scale projects that should be centrally implemented and managed by the university administration due to their scale and complexity. investment beyond the walls of new or existing buildings. They also include improvements to the movement network, including pedestrian, cycling and vehicular circulation, and transit and parking. Three additional projects relate to renewal and new development opportunities. List of University Projects Development Landscape and Open Space L1. Escarpment Edge L2. Memorial Wood L4. East Walk L5. Jubilee Court L6. West Common L7. East Common L8. South Walk L10. Campus Gateways Brock University Campus Plan Open House DRAFT

19 Land Use Strategy 8 structure for the organization and location of uses and activities on campus. The land use distribution supports an integrated campus and builds on the existing structure and pattern of uses. Academic activities will continue to be concentrated near the heart of campus with other supportive functions and services intermixed to reinforce learning and campus life. Existing residential uses and athletics will be established along Glenridge Avenue, including a major mixed-use Academic services, administration and amenities. Residential areas will continue to support existing student residences and provide opportunities for ongoing renewal. Athletics and recreation uses are priority uses in the northwest area of campus. Mixed Use areas will accommodate a wide range of uses, including potential partnerships, that complement the academic zone. The Mixed Use Node services and amenities for the campus community. The development based on the future needs of the university. The will accommodate the facilities to maintain the day-to-day operations of The Land Reserve designation recognizes the unknown future of these lands due to their physical constraints and isolation. Brock University Campus Plan Open House DRAFT

20 Opportunities for Renewal and New Development 9 Future campus growth will see the evolution of facilities over time through a combination of renewal, redevelopment and new development. Investment in existing campus buildings to improve their quality and condition is a major priority. Strategic redevelopment of some buildings should be considered in some areas of campus to remove buildings that cycle and are located on sites that offer strategic opportunities for new development and more intensive uses. of future development opportunities provides structure and clarity for future campus growth. The Precinct Plans provide greater detail for implementation of projects in these areas based on their relationship to the overall Campus Plan framework. University Projects mid-term redevelopment years near-term redevelopment 1-10 years Potential redevelopment Potential renewal Areas that can accommodate new development D1 development Brock University Campus Plan Open House DRAFT

21 Movement Network 10 The movement network illustrates the long-term network of transportation infrastructure that will support campus access, circulation and new development opportunities. While continuing to accommodate all modes of travel to and within the campus, the movement network will expand to better support active and sustainable modes of transportation, including walking, cycling and transit use. A connected, walkable and accessible campus supports academic and new infrastructure, supports mobility options and contributes to to accommodate cars and the demand for parking with the desire for a pedestrian-friendly campus that supports the growing number of students living close to campus. University Projects Primary campus road Secondary campus road Long term primary road connection Long term secondary road connection Service road Regional road Local road Pickup & drop-off Transit Primary campus cycling route Secondary cycling route Existing city cycling route Proposed cycling route Pedestrian spine Major paths Sidewalks Internal pedestrian connection Key activity nodes M1 Brock University Campus Plan Open House DRAFT

22 University Projects - Movement Network 11 University Project M1: Brock Mall North University Project M2: University Road University Project M3: Campus Drive Enhancing the existing transit increase capacity and streamline transit operations. up drop-off location on campus and will include dedicated bicycle infrastructure in the long-term. Campus Drive will connect each of the campus entries, improve access to campus and parking area, and unlock new development sites. Typical Street Section of Campus Drive Brock University Campus Plan Open House DRAFT

23 Landscape and Open Space Network 12 The landscape and open space strategy plays an important role in establishing the campus setting, shaping development patterns and reinforcing the movement network. The Niagara Escarpment, in enhance the campus experience, by reconnecting the existing open spaces and buildings with this unique natural asset. and approach to the open space network. The environmental, town and function of the different types of places found on campus. Recognizing the role of these zones will provide clear direction on the maintenance and renewal of existing places and provide a clear context for the design and University Projects L1. Escarpment Edge L2. Memorial Wood L4. East Walk L5. Jubilee Court L6. West Common L7. East Common L8. South Walk L10. Campus Gateways The Environmental Zone surrounding the campus. The Town and Country provides a buffer to the Environmental Zone, allowing for the sensitive integration of development and recreational uses. The Modern Zone extends a formal landscape throughout the interior part of campus, It supports intensive use and pedestrian activity while providing and immediate setting for buildings. Gateways are places that mark the entrance or arrival to campus. Landmarks elements L1 Brock University Campus Plan Open House DRAFT

24 University Projects - Landscape and Open Space 13 University Project L1: Escarpment Edge The Escarpment Edge will integrate and restore the natural character to north edge of campus while providing a continuous bicycle and pedestrian connection. University Project L3: Brock Mall and Circle The ongoing management of reinforce it as the focal open space of campus through the formal design of its landscape and buildings. Section of Escarpment Edge Cutting Thrugh Servicing and Parking Area looking west 1 2 The Escarpment Edge today Illustration of the Escarpment Edge with continuous pedestrian / cycling route continuous multiuse trail consolidated & screened servicing and parking area naturalization area continuous multiuse trail 3 Brock University Campus Plan Open House DRAFT

25 Infrastructure, Utilities and Sustainability 14 The University s infrastructure and utilities provide the means to achieve sustainability objectives buildings. Campus utilities include steam and chilled water, water and wastewater systems, stormwater, electricity and telecommunications networks, and other minor utilities. effective means of heating and cooling campus buildings. This network and and minimizing contributions to climate change. The university will continue to expand and improve the district energy network and other utility systems to support new campus development and users. Continued attention to energy conservation, carbon emission reductions, water conservation and on-site stormwater management will minimize downstream impacts. Heating/Cooling Zones Solar Opportunity Zone Stormwater Management Brock University Campus Plan Open House DRAFT

26 Long-Term Demonstration Plan 15 The Long-Term Demonstration Plan is an illustration of how the campus of the future could look if the vision and framework of campus systems were fully implemented over the coming decades years. and broader Niagara community to live, work, teach, learn and play. The campus will build on its compact, connected and intimate character by experience. The campus core will be the focal point of campus life and will be reinforced through the renewal and development of high quality academic facilities that are supported by various amenities. NIAGARA ESCARPMENT routes and transit amenities will ensure that people can access and move around campus safely and easily. The campus open spaces will strengthen existing and new development. UNIVERSITY ROAD SIR ISAAC BROCK WAY GLENRIDGE AVE centre that welcomes members of the broader Niagara community. The partnerships that will enrich the academic program and enhance the MERRITTVILLE HIGHWAY Brock University Campus Plan Open House DRAFT

27 Long-Term Demonstration Plan 16 JOHN MACDONELL STREET GLENRIDGE AVENUE UNIVERSITY ROAD CAMPUS DRIVE SIR ISAAC BROCK WAY UNIVERSITY ROAD UNIVERSITY ROAD SIR ISAAC BROCK WAY GLENRIDGE AVENUE CAMPUS DRIVE SCHMON PARKWAY FLORA EGERTER WAY RING ROAD East Precinct (looking north) UNIVERSITY ROAD CAMPUS DRIVE RING ROAD MERRITTVILLE HIGHWAY West Campus (looking northwest) Brock University Campus Plan Open House DRAFT

28 Near-Term Demonstration Plan 17 The Near-Term Demonstration Plan highlights a series of development opportunities and priority projects that may be considered to meet the University s needs over the next 20 years while setting the stage for future development. ensure the evolving campus environment supports and protects for new development opportunities and reinforces the long-term vision for the campus. NIAGARA ESCARPMENT Campus Renewal and Development Renew and/or redevelop buildings with the pressing maintenance needs. Establish a campus focal point and expand the campus core through Schmon Tower Atrium project. Develop a mixed use node on East Campus Renovate of Taro Hall and Accommodate future academic expansion in parking lot A. Pursue partnership opportunities in South Campus. Construct a new works yard in South Campus. Campus Movement Construct two new campus entrances to relieve congestion. Invest in a complete and interconnected street network. Relocate surface parking to South Campus as required. Improve cycling network on- and off-campus. UNIVERSITY ROAD GLENRIDGE AVE SIR ISAAC BROCK WAY MERRITTVILLE HIGHWAY Campus Open Space Extend the East and South Walk from the Main Campus Brock University Campus Plan Open House DRAFT

29 Precinct Plans 18 The Precinct Plans will be an important tool for implementing the Campus Plan by consolidating the opportunities and requirements for campus evolution on a place-by-place basis. The Precinct Plans establish guidelines for development and identify the enabling and coordinated projects that must be considered in new building and renewal projects. to plan and evaluate campus projects within the comprehensive framework implementation, the campus has been divided into four precincts. A3 L3 Development parcel Renewal sites Open space projects M3 L9 Movement projects Streetscape projects L10 Gateway Primary pedestrian connection Internal pedestrian connection Landmarks P Key building frontage Primary entrance Pickup & drop-off zone Service access Pickup & drop-off zone Potential parking structure location Brock University Campus Plan Open House DRAFT

30 Feedback and Next Steps 19 Thank You! Thank you for participating in today s open house to learn about the planning process and review the Draft Campus Plan. We want you to tell us what you think. There are a number of ways to provide Next Steps Draft Campus Plan into a consolidated Campus Plan report which will be Speak to a member of the consultant team here today Yiwen Zhu, Project Manager yzhu@urbanstrategies.com Roland Mech, Associate Director, Space Management and Planning rmech@brocku.ca Brock University Campus Plan Open House DRAFT

31 Board of Trustees Report to the Capital Infrastructure Committee Information Item TOPIC: Fiscal Framework A Closer Look at Capital and Related Projects December 2, 2015 Bryan Boles, Associate Vice-President, Finance REPORT A fiscal framework is being developed for the purpose of financial planning. The fiscal framework is being reviewed for comment by the Financial Planning and Investment Committee this Board of Trustees cycle. A presentation providing a closer look at the impact on capital and related projects is attached as Appendix 1. APPENDIX Appendix 1 DRAFT Fiscal Framework A Closer Look at Capital and Related Projects (22 pages)

32 Capital Infrastructure Committee TOPIC: Fiscal Framework A Closer Look at Capital and Related Projects December 2, 2015 Appendix 1 Fiscal Framework A Closer Look at Capital and Related Projects - December

33 Forward looking information This presentation contains forward looking information. It is the accumulation of financial information obtained from Unit budget developers across the University. In preparing the following forecasts and budgets, certain assumptions and estimates were necessary. These assumptions and estimates are based on information available to Unit budget developers at the time of preparing the following forecasts and budgets. Users of this information are cautioned that actual results may vary. All figures are in ( 000s) unless otherwise noted. 2

34 Agenda Fiscal Framework Goal Key aspects of the model with respect to capital and related projects Debt repayment Maintaining our Infrastructure Frequently Asked Questions 3

35 Fiscal Framework The goal of the model is to recognize our history and budget environment and using key metrics help us address the looking forward observations and resource allocation questions to ensure a fiscally sustainable Brock University. 4

36 Key aspects of the model The model can best be described as a pay-as-you-go. The model concentrates on reducing debt. The model forecasts no new debt. The model concentrates funding on deferred maintenance and core applications associated with information technology. New capital requirements are highly depend on donations and/or other incremental sources of funding not already worked into the fiscal framework. 5

37 Key aspects of the model Why no new debt Fiscal structure Political Environment Demographics Financing Structure Limited Flexibility No Flexibility Negative Flexibility No Flexibility Majority of revenue is regulated. Majority of costs are salary, wages and benefits tied to union agreements. Province s fiscal flexibility is limited. Increasing tuition is politically complicated for the Province. Demographics indicate a declining cohort of year olds in the coming years. This has already been worked into our future enrolment estimates. We cannot raise equity. We can only raise debt. 6

38 Key aspects of the model The model is funded as follows The base funding for debt, capital and related projects is maintained. The base funding grows by the construction price index (currently estimated at 2.5%). New ministry funding through the Facilities Renewal Program (FRP) are added into the program as received. A one-time increase to the base will occur as a result of an increase to parking fees to support the capital infrastructure of parking, road and transit. 7

39 Key aspects of the model Combining debt and deferred maintenance The funding envelopes of deferred maintenance and debt are to be combined and increased at the construction index (currently 2.5%). The aggregate funding model looks like this: 8 The rational is simple both envelopes relate to infrastructure. It makes sense that the debt originally allowed for new infrastructure to be built. As the debt is paid off, that infrastructure that was once new now requires deferred maintenance work. It makes sense to repurpose those debt payments to main infrastructure. This model forecasts no new facilities renewal program funding after or divestitures or repurposing of infrastructure. Interesting fact: On a discounted basis this model will require no more tuition and grant funding in 30 years then it does today.

40 Key aspects of the model By the numbers Capital and Related Project Budget going out to April

41 Key aspects of the model By the numbers Debt Servicing Costs going out to April

42 Key aspects of the model By the numbers Capital and Related Project Budget going out to April

43 Key aspects of the model By the numbers Facilities management funding out to April 2021 * One-time temporary reduction in deferred maintenance funding to complete Post-Cairns MIWSFPA renovations. Information technology funding out to April

44 Key aspects of the model By the numbers Total Debt Outstanding going out to April

45 14 Debt repayment

46 Debt and DM intersect Cairns MIWSFPA Deferred maintenance and sinking fund Residence Sinking fund 15

47 Maintaining our infrastructure Caution: This is for illustrative purposes only. The expectation that investment would persist to bring FCI significantly below 0.10 may be unrealistic. Reinvestment decisions should be made once FCI approaches

48 Frequently asked questions If funding is budgeted to complete a project Q: Is the funding held for that specific project until completion of that project? A: Yes, unless it becomes apparent that the project can be completed for less then budget. At this point a budget transfer would occur as per the Delegation of Authority. Q: And the project is not completed in the year it was budgeted, are the costs incurred in the following or following years covered by the funding originally budgeted? A: Yes Q: And the project is completed in either a surplus / deficit position what happens? A: The Capital and Related Project program maintains a Facilitates Management and Information Technology over/short reserve. All surpluses and deficits are closed out to this reserve as per the Delegation of Authority. 17

49 Frequently asked questions The fiscal framework outlines a certain amount of available funding per year Q: What happens if a project is expected to take multiple years? Will the funding be budgeted all in the initial year or over the years the project is expected to be completed? A: For smaller projects, generally defined as less than $1 million, it is expected that the complete project funding requirement be included in the budget of an individual year. For larger projects, generally defined as greater then or equal to $1 million, the funding could be budgeted over the years the project is expected to be completed. The intent is to match the years with cash flow and specifically identify these projects in the budget. An example of a larger project is the new accounting system it is financed $3.8 million up front and $1 million in the second year. Another example could be the post-miwsfpa construction. 18

50 Frequently asked questions The fiscal framework outlines a certain amount of available funding per year Q: Will any of that funding be going into reserves to accumulate funds to do larger capital projects? A: The fiscal framework certainly allows for funds to be set aside in reserves but it was designed to put funding to work immediately given the significant backlog in deferred maintenance and insufficient core information technology applications. Q: If limited reserves are to be maintained how would a large capital project get completed if the cost was larger then the funding allocation of any one year and the cash flows would occur primarily in one year? A: The fundamental requirement of the fiscal framework is that it requires a visible and knowing funding plan for investments. In this situation a capital project could be approved provided a funding plan was put in place. That funding plan may include reducing the follow year or years spending. 19

51 Frequently asked questions The fiscal framework outlines a certain amount of available funding per year Q: If upon approval there is spending on larger capital projects in advance of the cash being budgeted, how will this impact the University cash flow? A: Recognizing the size of the capital program compared to the size of the operating budget it is anticipated that such projects could be temporarily funded through working capital and/or the temporarily unspent funding of previously approved capital projects. The concept here is to ensure unspent cash is producing value. It is anticipated that these types of projects will be limited and their impact on cash flow would need to be reviewed as part of the project approval on a case by case basis. 20

52 Available information Annual reports, budget reports, quarterly reporting can be found at: Revenue and expense allocation information can be found at: Finance connect newsletter can be found at: 21

53 22 Questions/comments?

54 Board of Trustees Report to the Capital Infrastructure Committee Information Item TOPIC: Five-Year Long Term Capital Plan Outlook December 2, 2015 Tom Saint-Ivany, Associate Vice-President, Facilities Management David Cullum, Associate Vice-President, Information Technology Services Bryan Boles, Associate Vice-President, Finance KNOWN MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTI-YEAR DEVELOPMENT The following five projects, considered to be Major Capital Projects as they are expected to have Total Project Budgets that exceed $1,000,000, have been identified in the FY 16/17 Long Term Capital Plan (see Cycle #2 Topic Report Capital and Related Project Budget ) for further limited development: Schmon Tower Student Services Atrium International Centre Building Phase 2 1 Heritage Plaza - Brock-Niagara Centre for Health & Well-being Schmon Tower Renewal 3 rd Campus Entrance and Grounds Yard Relocation The first four projects were submitted to MTCU on August 31, 2015 as part of the Ministry s update of their inventory of postsecondary education capital priority projects. Management intends on undertaking the further development of those four Major Capital Projects, consisting of either additional planning and/or design, so that MTCU s inventory of Brock University s projects is closer to being tender-ready. Further development of these projects using consultant resources will enable future decision-making on approvals to proceed with the allocation of resources for further development including design and/or construction. The fifth project, the 3 rd Campus Entrance & Grounds Yard Relocation, is the only one, following FY 16/17 design, intended to be recommended in the FY 17/18 Long Term Capital Plan for substantive funding, tender and construction in FY 17/18. An overview of the current status of these five projects along with a one-page synopsis of each of these projects is provided at Appendix 1. 1 This project was formerly titled as the Norman Road Phase 2 and then the John Macdonell Street Phase 2 project. On the advice of the Executive Committee it was renamed to more clearly reflect the purpose of the project. 1/3

55 LONG TERM CAPITAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT The Five-Year Long Term Capital Plan outlook has been updated (Appendices 2 and 3) since last reported to the Committee at Cycle 1 (September 30, 2015) and is based on the planned Fiscal Framework for Capital and Related Projects. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DELIVERED CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS FY 17/18 TO FY 20/21 Balanced with the multi-year Fiscal Framework for Capital and Related Projects, the capital requirements content for the four future LTCP FYs beyond FY 16/17 will be shaped by the analysis, integration and prioritization of outcomes arising from: The Campus Plan Update The Residences Facility Condition Audit Housing Master Plan Parking Master Plan Facility Needs & Priorities Study Update (the University s Space Plan) Energy Conservation and Demand Management Plan Update Capital Asset Management Plans Reserve Fund Studies: CFHBRC, Schmon Tower, MIWSFPA In addition to planning on and recommending the full funding of the 3 rd Campus Entrance & Grounds Yard Relocation in FY 17/18 there will be an emphasis on the renewal and improvement of the University s Main Campus roads (Residence Road, Sir Isaac Brock Boulevards North/South/East/West, Village Residence access road & courtyard lanes, and parking lots) over the next two years. Capital requirements arising from the Energy Conservation and Demand Management Plan include the development of solar and wind generated electricity and the phased replacement of the natural gas powered reciprocating engines in the Co-generation Plant used for heating, cooling, and powering much of the Main Campus in order to achieve operating cost savings related to natural gas consumption and to reduce the University s green-house gas emissions. The phased replacement of sub-surface waterlines used for potable water and the district distribution of water used for heating and cooling will be undertaken, as the waterlines to and from the Cogeneration plant are getting thinner. Classroom modernization and renewal, Accessible Built Environment improvements (FY 17/18 will see the recommendation the installation of an elevator in the two-floor Central Utilities Building following design in FY 16/17), and Residences and non-residences deferred maintenance along with the undertaking of capital requirements coming due as identified in the capital asset management plans and reserve fund studies will be included. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DELIVERED CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS FY 17/18 TO FY 20/21 Information Technology Services (ITS) capital spend over the next five years is emphasized towards the replacement of Brock core applications. Other core applications identified to be replaced within this time frame are: Human Resource Information System Facilities Management Computerized Facility Management System Student Information System Learning Management System 2/3

56 An application road map has been developed by ITS to ensure those core systems and other midtier systems have been flagged for review and possible replacement. Also included in the ITS capital spend for FY 17/18 FY 20/21 is a review and replacement of Brock s Telecom system which is now 15 years old and nearing its support life. The review will help steer as to what direction would be the best in terms of Brock requirements and technology. Door access systems is another major system identified to be addressed over the next 4-5 years. We currently have multiple door access systems and many administrators of these systems resulting in poor administration and security overall. As an interim, ITS is leading a project to bridge these multiple systems to improve the administration and security vulnerabilities identified. As part of the ITS evergreening (Deferred Maintenance) program, network infrastructure such as Core and edge switches are in line to be replaced as they are near end of life and support. This is in line with ITS evergreening strategy. APPENDICES Appendix 1 Status of Known Major Capital Project Requirements for Development (8 pages) Appendix 2 Five-Year Long Term Capital Plan Outlook - Graphical (1 page) Appendix 3 Five-Year Long Term Capital Plan Outlook - Tabular (1 page) 3/3

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65 Brock University Five-Year Long Term Capital Plan Outlook - Graphical Capital Infrastructure Committee TOPIC: Capital and Related Project Budget December 2, 2015 Appendix 2 Year Total Actuals FM Actuals IT Actuals Total LTCP Budget FM LTCP Budget IT LTCP Budget ,738 2, ,445 4, ,952 3, * 3,905 3, ,325 8,780 1, ,800 8,500 5, (Draft) 12,264 8,088 4, ,127 9,719 4, ,508 10,370 5, ,514 11,026 6, ,899 11,249 6,650 * 14/15 FM Budget includes $2 million reserve $18,000 Capital Budget & Actuals ($000s) $16,000 $14,000 $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $ * (DraF) Total Actuals FM Actuals IT Actuals Total LTCP Budget FM LTCP Budget IT LTCP Budget

66 Brock University Five- Year Long Term Capital Plan Outlook - Tabular Actual Spend Unspent** Forecast Q Q Actuals Actuals Actuals Actuals Actuals Unspent Draft Budget Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Specific Major Projects 35,773,193 17,588,845 23,400,070 14,846,241 2,972,210 * 24,701,698 *** Core FM Projects FM Major Projects 150,319 5,020 6, ,312 2,311,688 New Construction and Replacements (less than $1M) 250,000 Buildings 721,071 1,001,906 1,532,692 1,872,693 1,765,891 3,221,305 1,352,500 1,250,000 2,550,000 2,250,000 4,000,000 Roads, Parking lots, - 87,186 38, ,432 1, , ,000 1,188,312 2,000,000 2,000, ,000 Above surface, sub- surface utilities 106,937 28, ,989 9,252 1, , ,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Adaptations, renovations 2,769, ,684 4, ,466 1,754,836 4,060, , , , ,500 AODA 257,035 11, ,135 19,800 92, , , , , , ,000 Energy Conservation & Demand Management 39, , ,236 50,843 51, , , , , ,000 Audits and Studies 109, , , , , , , , , , ,000 Residence 1,258, , , ,624 1,367,408 1,578, ,188 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Vehicles & Wheeled Equipment 82, , ,264 72, ,557 77, , , , , ,500 Reserve 2,050,000 Total Core FM Projects 2,574,318 4,657,073 3,087,117 3,052,635 4,075,345 10,426,736 8,087,500 9,719,000 10,370,000 11,026,000 11,249,000 Total FM Projects 38,347,511 22,245,918 26,487,187 17,898,876 7,047,555 35,128,434 8,087,500 9,719,000 10,370,000 11,026,000 11,249,000 IT Projects Core Applications 70,799 3,729,201 1,639,000 2,832,000 3,523,000 4,832,000 4,953,000 IT- Non Residences Evergreening & Growth 164, , , , ,533 1,125,082 1,622,800 1,202,000 1,235,000 1,256,000 1,277,000 IT- Residences - 70,456 12, , , , , , , , ,000 Total IT Projects 164, , , , ,255 5,355,852 4,176,500 4,408,000 5,138,000 6,488,000 6,650,000 Forecasted (to be allocated to FM & IT) 13,127,000 15,508,000 17,514,000 17,899,000 Total FM and IT Projects 38,511,684 23,033,964 27,352,593 18,750,700 7,783,810 40,484,286 12,264,000 14,127,000 15,508,000 17,514,000 17,899,000 Notes: * Includes MIWSFPA actuals, which aren't reflected in the Q2 Capital Update ** Includes all projects previously approved by the Board *** Does not include the MIWSFPA overspend Major projects in 15/16 - $2.8M additional funding added to IT Core Application for Finance System Major projects in 17/18 - $1M additional funding added to IT Core Applications for FM In FY 17/18, the $1,000,000 difference between the Plan's "Total" and the Framework's "Forecasted (to be allocated to FM & IT" is intended to be funded from Reserves Capital Infrastructure Committee TOPIC: Five-Year Long Term Capital Plan Outlook December 2, 2015 Appendix 3

67 Board of Trustees Report to the Capital Infrastructure Committee Decision Item TOPIC: Capital and Related Project Budget December 2, 2015 Tom Saint-Ivany, Associate Vice-President, Facilities Management David Cullum, Associate Vice-President, Information Technology Services MOTION That the Capital Infrastructure Committee approve the Fiscal Year long term capital and related planning activities presented in Appendix 1 of the report to the Committee dated December 2, 2015 subject to funding approval from the Board of Trustees. DISCUSSION Following consultation and coordination, including with the Senate Information Technology and Infrastructure Committee and the Senior Administrative Council, the recommended FY Long Term Capital Plan (LTCP) at Appendix 1 provides a proposed best-fit alignment of known FY 16/17 capital requirements within the University s overall fiscal framework target of $12,264,000 for FY 16/17. Recommended allocations are graphically presented at Appendix 2. Approval will enable staff sufficient time to undertake preparatory work to prepare for the design and/or procurement of these capital requirements, including further progressive development of four of the seven multi-year major capital projects that were submitted by the University into MTCU s inventory of projects. Please refer to the current Cycle #2 Topic Report: Five-Year Long Term Capital Plan Outlook for specific information on those four major capital projects and their contemplated further development. The status of the three other projects is: a. Twin-pad Municipal Arena. This project, conceptually a municipally funded arena on University south campus lands in Thorold, was submitted to MTCU for information purposes only, with no expectation for provincial (or University) funding consideration. It has been recently confirmed with municipal authorities that there is no current need for it. b. Cool Climate Oenology and Viticulture Institute (CCOVI) Grape & Wine Innovation Platform. This project proposed the construction of a three floor, 7,289 gross square foot, addition onto the existing Main Campus Inniskillen Hall that is where CCOVI is accommodated. This project is being withdrawn for the purposes of undertaking a further look at program requirements including as it relates to industry benefits, needs and linkages. 1/2

68 c. Environmental Sustainability Research Centre (in the Alumni Greenhouse). The Alumni Greenhouse building, vacant since the occupancy of the greenhouses in the CFHBRC and with a Facility Condition Index of 0.82 (indicative of prohibitiveto-repair), is planned to be removed and the site restored. Alternative uses for the building were considered (a café, Applied Health Sciences dry labs, and the Environmental Sustainability Research Centre); however, it was concluded that those requirements could be more cost-effectively accommodated in existing or new space that is aligned with the Campus Plan Update (January 2016) and arising from the Facility Needs & Priorities Study Update (to be completed in 2016). Management intends on undertaking the design of the Third Campus Entrance & Grounds Yard Relocation (a major capital project) in 2016 and, at the December 2016 Board and Committee meetings, recommending the allocation of FY 17/18 LTCP funds (estimated at $2.3 million) for tender and construction in 2017 subject to having sought Board of Trustees approval. The Campus Plan Update will inform the design-brief that will be used to procure the Consulting Engineer services in respect of the routing of the new road and adjacent University land uses. The allocation of $3,305,000 to deferred maintenance falls short of the intended deferred maintenance annual spending target of $6,000,000. The allocation for Fiscal Year 2014/2015 was $4,980,730 and the allocation for the current Fiscal Year 2015/2016 is $6,017,500. The benefit achieved in funding short of the deferred maintenance target is that it enables the full scope of the $3.2 million Phase 2 Post-MIWSFPA bundle of projects to be achieved in FY 16/17 (versus further splitting them into a FY 17/18 Phase 3). This includes for the full conversion of the Sean O Sullivan Theatre into a lecture facility. In consideration of the Student Residence Needs Analysis & Housing Master Plan, that is now underway, and the results of the recently completed Residence facility condition audit, spending on Residence facilities will be less this year pending the inter-departmental analysis and determination of capital needs and priorities to be funded in future fiscal years (see Topic Report: Residence Facility Condition Index, dated December 2, 2015) Funding for the Finance System Core Application is included, along with funding to further develop the next group of Core Applications to be replaced. APPENDICES Appendix 1 Fiscal Year 2016/2017 Long Term Capital Plan (3 pages) Appendix 2 Fiscal Year 2016/2017 Long Term Capital Plan Allocations (2 pages) 2/2

69 DRAFT FISCAL YEAR 2016/2017 LONG TERM CAPITAL PLAN (LTCP) Financial Planning Target FM $8,087,500 DM: $6,000,000 Non-DM: $2,087,500 Financial Planning Target IT $4,176,500 IT Core Applications: $1,639,000 IT: $2,537,500 TOTAL FY 16/17 Planned $ Allocation $12,264,000 Project Category Budget Needs Remarks MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECTS (greater than $1 million) Schmon Tower Student Services Centre Atrium $50,000 Pre-design. Total Project Budget $12.1M est. International Centre Building Phase 2 $20,000 FN&P & Design Update. Total Project Budget $26.6M est. Heritage Plaza - Brock-Niagara Centre for Health & Well-being $50,000 SMA. Prepare Design-Build SOR. Total Project Budget $14M est. Schmon Tower Renewal DM $80,000 Feasibility Study. Total Project Total Project Budget $25M-$42M est 3 rd Campus Entrance & Grounds Yard Relocation $188,312 Design. FY17/18 Construct $2.3M. Total Project Budget $2.5M Sub-Total $388,312 NEW CONSTRUCTION AND REPLACEMENTS MINOR CAPITAL (less than $1 million) BUILDINGS Annual Controls Conversion DM $42,500 CUB Cooling Tower Renewal DM $100,000 High Voltage Equipment Renewal DM $75, V Sub-Station Deficiencies DM $85,000 Podium Roof DM $450,000 MC D Block Roof DM $325,000 Central Utilities Training Classroom Portable DM $100,000 Replace existing Flooring Renewal Program DM $50,000 Interior & Exterior Door Renewal DM $50,000 Alumni Greenhouse Demolition & Site Restoration DM $75,000 FCI 0.82 Sub-Total $1,352,500 ABOVE SURFACE/SUB-SURFACE UTILITIES, DRAINAGE, ROADS & PARKING LOTS, SIDEWALKS University Rd. East from Lot P to Alphie s DM $650,000 Reconstruction University Rd. East CFHBRC Kiss & Ride $100,000 Joint Health & Safety Cmtee #086 Aboriginal Students Garden $35,000 CFHBRC Site - North-West Corner Capital Contribution Merrittville Hwy Upgrades $35,000 Sidewalks & Lighting Sub-Total $820,000 November 19, /3

70 ADAPTATIONS/RENOVATIONS AND MAJOR RENEWAL Phase 2 Post-MIWSFPA Bundle of Projects $2,240,000 Phase 2 Total: $3,200,000 DM estimated $960,000 (Using Residence Res: $2,050,000) Centre for Digital Humanities $270,000 Re: FY 15/16 LTCP Project Classroom Modernization & Renewal $367,500 CRTTC Priorities - 7 x Seminar DM estimated $157,500 Rooms CFHBRC 400-Level Alterations - Kinesiology Grad $25,000 Functional Prog via FM op budget One Stop Student Services $160,000 ST 3 rd Floor 13 th Floor Board Room Chair Replacement $20,000 Sub-Total $4,200,000 AUDITS & STUDIES Facility Needs & Priorities (FN&P) Study $250,000 University Space Plan Facility Condition Audits DM $75,000 Recurring Annual VFA Asset Database Maintenance Services $20,500 Recurring Annual Thistle Classrms - Renewal & Accessibility Study $75,000 CRTTC Priority Pond Inlet Renovation Some DM $25,000 SOR Study Capital Asset Management Planning DM $30,000 CUB Building Reserve Fund Study Space Audits $20,000 Sub-Total $495,500 RESIDENCES Residences (Non-Deferred Maintenance) Village Furniture Replacement Phase 2 $100,000 DeCew Furniture replacement Phase 2 $100,000 Proximity Card Access System $124,188 Sub-Total $324,188 AODA ACCESSIBLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT (ABE Committee) Single-Use Accessible Washroom Call Stations AODA $72,000 Academic Service Counters AODA $28,000 CUB Elevator AODA $50,000 Design. FY17/18 Construct $600K Admin Service Counters AODA $27,000 Sub-Total $177,000 VEHICLES & WHEELED EQUIPMENT Replace FM 002 (RTV) $22,000 Replace FM 023 (CAT IT Loader) $135,000 Replace FM 028 (Kubota 3680 Mower) $36,000 Replace FM 057 (Full-size Van) $33,500 Replace FM 060 (Full-size Van) $33,500 Trailer-mounted Emergency Generator $70,000 For building plug-in e.g. Kenmore Sub-Total $330,000 November 19, /3

71 IT CORE APPLICATIONS Core Applications Development $639,000 IT Infrastructure Finance System $1,000,000 IT Infrastructure Sub-Total $1,639,000 IT NON-RESIDENCES Physical Security & Paging System Improvements $172,300 Hardware EG & Growth Payment Card Industry Audit $60,000 IT Infrastructure Sharepoint Forms Engine $35,000 Enterprise Software Wireless Expansion WH, SBH & TH $90,000 Hardware EG & Growth Replace switches in PLZ $252,000 Hardware EG & Growth Upgrade TH 300, Gaming Program area & Print $155,000 IT Infrastructure Shop. Central logging server Replace Edge Firewalls (HA) $200,000 Hardware EG & Growth Infrastructure Growth & VPN $214,000 Hardware EG & Growth Data Centre & Campus UPS $80,000 Hardware EG & Growth Hamilton WAN Network Improvements $15,000 IT Infrastructure Replace 228 PC s & 140 Monitors $258,000 Hardware EG & Growth Replace projectors in WH 324, GLN 162, 164, 212 $15,000 Hardware EG & Growth & MC A241 Replace video conferencing equipment in CRN $31,500 Hardware EG & Growth 217 & Sankey and install ST 1215 for H.R. Upgrade audio & install control unit WH 147 $35,000 Hardware EG & Growth Backup server for Video Centre $10,000 IT Infrastructure Sub-Total $1,622,800 IT RESIDENCES Wireless Expansion LOW, GBV & EARP $480,000 Hardware EG & Growth Replace switches in LOW, GBV & EARP $110,700 Hardware EG & Growth Remove phones in rooms, deploy 380 phones in $79,000 Hardware EG & Growth common rooms Replace Edge Firewalls (HA) $235,000 Hardware EG & Growth Replace UPS $10,000 Hardware EG & Growth Sub-Total $914,700 TOTAL FY 16/17 Capital Requirements (Vis-à-Vis Planned $ Allocation) $12,264,000 FM DM: $3,305,000 FM Non-DM: $4,782,500 IT Core Applications: $1,639,000 IT Non-Res: $1,622,800 IT Res: $914,700 Grey Shaded Area Capital projects submitted into the MTCU Refresh of Capital Inventory for Postsecondary Education FM DM Deferred Maintenance (rose shaded) FM Non-DM -- Facilities Management-delivered Non-Deferred Maintenance (blue shaded) CRTTC Classroom Renewal, Teaching and Technologies Committee SOR Statement of Requirements (Functional Program) Est Estimated CUB Central Utilities Building (including Co-generation Plant) EG Ever-greening November 19, /3

72 FY 16/17 Long Term Capital Plan Alloca9ons Planned Alloca9on of $12,264,000 Major Capital Project Development Buildings Above/Sub- Surface U?li?es, Drainage, Roads & Parking Lots, Sidewalks Adapta?ons/Renova?ons and Major Renewal Audits & Studies 1/2 Residences AODA Accessible Built Environment Vehicles & Wheeled Equipment IT - Core Applica?ons IT - Non- Residences IT - Residences Capital Infrastructure Committee TOPIC: Capital and Related Project Budget December 2, 2015 Appendix 2

73 FY 16/17 Long Term Capital Plan Alloca9ons Planned Alloca9on of $12,264,000 FM Deferred Maintenance $3,305,000 FM Non- Deferred Maintenance $4,782,500 IT - Core Applica?ons $1,639,000 IT - Non- Residences $1,622,800 IT - Residences $914,700 2/2

74 Board of Trustees Report to the Capital Infrastructure Committee Decision Item TOPIC: Q2 Financial Update on Capital and Related Projects December 2, 2015 Tom Saint-Ivany, Associate Vice-President, Facilities Management David Cullum, Associate Vice-President, Information Technology Services MOTION That the Capital Infrastructure Committee approve the inclusion of the additional capital and related requirements, identified in Management s Fiscal Year 2014/15 and Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Long Term Capital Plans Q2 Financial Update on Capital and Related Projects, into the Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Long Term Capital Plan. BACKGROUND As identified on September 30th, at Q1, the Capital Infrastructure Committee approved the additional LTCP capital requirements of $119,092 Non IT and $99,000 IT, increasing the previously approved 2014/15 and 2015/16 LTCP budgets to a revised total of $41,084,535 (Non-IT) and $6,943,932 (IT) respectively. DISCUSSION General. Nine (9) Non-IT projects and four (4) IT projects have been completed and closed since the Q1 update. Since the Q1 report, $2,397,366 has been spent on approved LTCP projects being delivered by Facilities Management. The Residence Reserve remains at $2,050, /16 LTCP. As at the end of Q2, two (2) Non-IT capital requirements have arisen totaling $88,500 (Table 1). With funding available from surpluses within the approved FY 15/16 LTCP, Management recommends that these requirements be added to the FY 15/16 LTCP. Capital Requirement ( DM Deferred Maintenance) Amount 2000 Years Sculpture Move $43,500 Washroom Upgrades Mackenzie Chown (DM) $45,000 Total $88,500 Table 1 1/2

75 In summary, as at the end of Q1, Management recommends: That the Non-IT capital requirements identified at Table 1, with funds available from surpluses within the Q2-approved FY 15/16 LTCP, be included in the FY 15/16 LTCP (highlighted in green on Appendix 1) APPENDIX Appendix /15 & 2015/16 LTCP Q2 Status Report as at October 26, 2015 (6 pages) 2/2

76 APPENDIX / /16 LTCP Q2 Status Report as at October 26, 2015 Capital Infrastructure Committee TOPIC: Q2 Financial Update on Capital and Related Projects December 2, 2015 Appendix /15 & 2015/16 LONG TERM CAPITAL PLAN (NON IT) COMPLETED PROJECTS Project Name Budget Year Q1 Sept/15 Approved Funding Q1 Funding Adjustments Approved Funding (A) 14/15 Actual Costs (B) 15/16 Actual Costs to October 26, 2015 (C) Project Variance (A-B-C) Cost at Completion Podium Roof - Phase 1 14/15 $ 110,000 $ 110,000 $ 109,226 $ - $ 774 $ 109,226 Facility Condition Audits (VFA) 14/15 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,541 $ - $ (541) $ 75,541 B Block Level 300 Network Upgrades 14/15 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 56,152 $ (191) $ 14,039 $ 55,961 South Block Wireless Upgrading 14/15 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 49,282 $ - $ 718 $ 49,282 Campus Wireless Upgrading 14/15 $ 28,100 $ 28,100 $ 27,999 $ - $ 101 $ 27,999 Faculty of Math & Science Paint Booth Code Compliance 14/15 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 68,680 $ - $ 1,320 $ 68,680 Thistle Make-up Air Upgrade 14/15 $ 27,000 $ 27,000 $ 19,304 $ - $ 7,696 $ 19,304 Faculty of Math & Science Nitrogen Room Upgrades 14/15 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 61,542 $ - $ (31,542) $ 61,542 Facility Improv. To Support ITS Classroom Improv. 14/15 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 25,427 $ - $ 14,573 $ 25,427 Thistle Door Replacements 14/15 $ 33,030 $ 33,030 $ 41,081 $ - $ (8,051) $ 41,081 East Academic Seminar Room A/V Renewal 14/15 $ 117,000 $ 117,000 $ 108,279 $ - $ 8,721 $ 108,279 Lowenberger Kitchen AHU Replacememt 14/15 $ 325,000 $ 325,000 $ 299,122 $ - $ 25,878 $ 299,122 Village Courts 10, 11, 12 Roof Replacement 14/15 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 142,490 $ - $ (17,490) $ 142,490 WH /15 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,138 $ - $ (138) $ 8,138 WH /15 $ 85,000 $ 85,000 $ 86,612 $ - $ (1,612) $ 86,612 Campus Entrance Sign Renewal 14/15 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 6,730 $ - $ 23,270 $ 6,730 Sculpture Relocation 14/15 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 32,471 $ - $ 7,529 $ 32,471 Water Conservation - low flow toilets 14/15 $ 19,000 $ 19,000 $ 18,943 $ - $ 57 $ 18,943 Vehicles - Ancillary Utility Vehicles 14/15 $ 17,000 $ 17,000 $ 17,062 $ - $ (62) $ 17,062 Vehicles - FM Small Equipment 14/15 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 9,493 $ - $ 507 $ 9,493 Vehicles - Security 14/15 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 46,394 $ - $ 8,606 $ 46,394 Isaac Brock Blvd Transit Waiting Area Improvements (Reduced Scope) 14/15 $ 64,700 $ 64,700 $ 58,404 $ - $ 6,296 $ 58,404 BRIC Watermain Replacement - Additional Expenses 14/15 $ - $ - $ 8,554 $ - $ (8,554) $ 8,554 BUSU Roof Replacement 14/15 $ 280,460 $ 280,460 $ 280,460 $ - $ - $ 280,460 Plaza /15 $ 8,415 $ 8,415 $ 8,415 $ - $ - $ 8,415 Aquatic Centre - Final Costs 14/15 $ 8,190 $ 8,190 $ 10,796 $ - $ (2,606) $ 10,796 CFHBRC Asset Management Plan/Reserve Fund Study 14/15 $ 42,900 $ 42,900 $ 20,992 $ 2,896 $ 19,012 $ 23,888 Schmon Tower Lobby Millwork 14/15 $ - $ - $ 19,911 $ - $ (19,911) $ 19,911 High Voltage Equipment Renewal 14/15 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 64,372 $ 9,917 $ 711 $ 74,289 WH 324 (tiered classroom) - Ph1 Design 14/15 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 15,720 $ (5,169) $ 9,449 $ 10,551 Add Twin Exchanger at HX-2 14/15 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 5,361 $ 5,687 $ 88,952 $ 11,048 Campus Metering 14/15 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 18,148 $ 28,046 $ 3,806 $ 46,194 Emergency Exit Light Replacements (LED) 14/15 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 836 $ - $ 9,164 $ 836 Project Management Expenses 14/15 $ 152,040 $ 152,040 $ 148,767 $ - $ 3,273 $ 148,767 Cogen Energy Audit and Mass Balance Study 14/15 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 12,849 $ 5,506 $ 1,645 $ 18,355 Walker Complex Humidification Boiler Replacement 14/15 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 7,219 $ 13,770 $ 24,011 $ 20,989 Cairns East Entrance Door Replacement 14/15 $ 46,370 $ 46,370 $ 69,814 $ 25,042 $ (48,486) $ 94,856 Schmon Tower Elevators 14/15 $ 26,400 $ 26,400 $ 27,278 $ (878) $ 27,278 Exam Desks & Chairs 14/15 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 34,100 $ 5,900 $ 34,100 General 14/15 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Swimming Pool Hydraulic Cylinder Renewal 15/16 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 3,476 $ 71,524 $ 3,476 MC "A" Roofs 57,58 15/16 $ 425,000 $ 425,000 $ 323,542 $ 101,458 $ 323,542 FM Staff Vehicle Replacement - Used 15/16 $ 18,000 $ 18,000 $ 23,955 $ (5,955) $ 23,955 MIWSFPA vehicle 15/16 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 24,335 $ 10,665 $ 24,335 Community & Ancillary Services (Conf Serv RTV's) 15/16 $ 21,000 $ 21,000 $ 19,165 $ 1,835 $ 19,165 MCC F314 Modifications /16 $ - $ 12,107 $ 12,107 $ 12,107 $ - $ 12,107 Campus Security New and Replacement Vehicle 15/16 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 25,943 $ 9,057 $ 25,943 Total Completed Non IT Projects $ 2,962,605 $ 12,107 $ 2,974,712 $ 2,060,586 $ 579,407 $ 334,720 $ 2,639,993 Page 1 of 6

77 APPENDIX / /16 LTCP Q2 Status Report as at October 26, 2015 Capital Infrastructure Committee TOPIC: Q2 Financial Update on Capital and Related Projects December 2, 2015 Appendix /15 & 2015/16 LONG TERM CAPITAL PLAN (NON IT) REMAINING PROJECTS Project Name Budget Year Approved Funding Q1 Funding Adjustments Revised Funding (A) Actual Costs 14/15 (B) 15/16 Actual Costs to Date Total Project Variance Total Projected Cost at Completion Total 15/16 Total 16/17 Total 17/18 Total 18/19 Projected Cost Projected Projected Cost Projected (October 26, 2015) (C) Cost (D) (E) Cost (F) (A-B-C-D-E-F) (B+C+D+E+F) MAJOR CAPITAL Goodman School of Business - Alternative Planning 14/15 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 119,901 $ 5,020 $ 5,099 $ - $ 125,000 Artificial Turf Sports Field- Design Fees 14/15 $ 60,325 $ - $ 60,325 $ 30,418 $ 5,275 $ 29,907 $ - $ 60,325 Artificial Turf Sports Field (Construction) 14/15 $ 1,500,000 $ 135 $ 1,500,135 $ 810,563 $ 1,500,135 $ - $ 1,500,135 Schmon Tower Atrium 14/15 $ 5,337 $ 1,142 $ 6,479 $ - $ 6,479 $ - Goodman School of Business 15/16 $ 22,000,000 $ - $ 22,000,000 $ 12,506 $ 1,200,000 $ 7,400,000 $ 13,250,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ 22,000,000 Goodman School of Business 15/16 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 Total Major Capital $ 25,690,662 $ 1,277 $ 25,691,939 $ 150,319 $ 833,364 $ 2,735,141 $ 7,400,000 $ 15,250,000 $ 150,000 $ 6,479 $ 25,685,460 NEW CONSTRUCTION & REPLACEMENT (UNDER $1 MILLION) Data Centre Generator 15/16 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ 250,000 Total New Construction & Replacement $ 250,000 $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 BUILDINGS Annual Controls Conversion 14/15 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 67,386 $ (1,071) $ 7,614 $ - $ 75,000 Mackenzie Chown Fire Alarm Replacement 14/15 $ 1,402,000 $ 1,402,000 $ 362,839 $ 371,988 $ 1,039,161 $ - $ 1,402,000 Aquatic Centre Structural Repair - Ph 1 Design 14/15 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 51,971 $ 10,556 $ 98,029 $ - $ 150,000 POST MIWSFPA- Schmon Tower Upgrades - Design Fees 14/15 $ 62,046 $ 62,046 $ 21,964 $ 6,408 $ 40,082 $ - $ 62,046 Walker Complex - Faculty of AHS Air Quality Upgrades - Ph 1 Design 14/15 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 30 $ 2,830 $ 59,970 $ - $ 60,000 East Academic Site Work 14/15 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000 POST MIWSFPA- SOS THEATRE Upgrades -Design Fees 14/15 $ 87,381 $ 87,381 $ - $ 3,404 $ 87,381 $ - $ 87,381 POST MIWSFPA- Thistle Upgrades - Design Fees 14/15 $ 85,313 $ 85,313 $ 23,477 $ 37,747 $ 61,836 $ - $ 85,313 POST MIWSFPA- Glenridge/East Academic Upgrades - Design Fees 14/15 $ 40,260 $ 40,260 $ 7,033 $ 10,241 $ 33,227 $ - $ 40,260 Print Shop Lift (G Block Elevator) 14/15 $ 60,600 $ 60,600 $ 7,658 $ 29,658 $ 92,342 $ (39,400) $ 100,000 Aquatic Centre Structural Repair 15/16 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 318,206 $ 1,200,000 $ - $ 1,200,000 High Voltage Equipment Renewal 15/16 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 9,917 $ 16,391 $ 65,083 $ - $ 75,000 Annual Controls Conversion 15/16 $ 32,500 $ 32,500 $ 27,497 $ 32,500 $ - $ 32, V Sub-Station Deficiencies 15/16 $ 85,000 $ 85,000 $ 2,877 $ 85,000 $ - $ 85,000 Walker Complex-FAHS Air Quality Upgrades 15/16 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 Podium Roof 15/16 $ 435,000 $ 435,000 $ 481,777 $ 532,000 $ (97,000) $ 532,000 Install Dehumidifiers- Cairns 15/16 $ - $ 52,757 $ 52,757 $ - $ 52,757 $ - $ - $ 52,757 BUSU Bus Shelters 15/16 $ - $ - $ 3,505 $ 40,000 $ (40,000) $ 40,000 Schmon Tower 3rd Flr Carpet Repl. 15/16 $ - $ - $ - $ 40,000 $ (40,000) $ 40,000 Schmon Tower Lobby Floor 15/16 $ - $ - $ - $ 20,000 $ 130,000 $ (150,000) $ 150,000 Total Buildings $ 4,900,100 $ 52,757 $ 4,952,857 $ 552,275 $ 1,322,016 $ 3,636,982 $ 1,130,000 $ - $ - $ (366,400) $ 5,319,257 ROADS, PARKING LOTS, WALKWAYS, STRUCTURES, SURFACE DRAINAGE BRIC Parking Lot Rebuilding 14/15 $ 253,000 $ 253,000 $ 239,390 $ (0) $ - $ 13,610 $ 239,390 Third Campus Entrance Design 14/15 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 9,543 $ 0 $ 35,457 $ - $ 45,000 Asphalt Repairs to Various Roads 14/15 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 1,468 $ 49,601 $ (4,601) $ 49,601 Total Roads, Parking Lots, Walkways, Structures $ 343,000 $ - $ 343,000 $ 248,933 $ 1,468 $ 85,058 $ - $ - $ - $ 9,009 $ 333,991 SURFACE/ABOVE, SUB-SURFACE UTILITIES, DISTRIBUTION Back-flow Prevention - St. Catharines 14/15 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 698 $ 1,243 $ 49,302 $ - $ - $ 50,000 Potable Water Piping Master Plan/Design (for tunnel and buried piping) 14/15 $ 110,000 $ 110,000 $ - $ 110,000 $ - $ 110,000 Stormwater Management Facility 14/15 $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 217 $ 215,000 $ - $ 215,000 Back-Flow Prevention - St. Catharines 15/16 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000 Total Surface/Above, Sub-Surface Utilities $ 425,000 $ - $ 425,000 $ 698 $ 1,460 $ 374,302 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 425,000 Page 2 of 6

78 APPENDIX / /16 LTCP Q2 Status Report as at October 26, 2015 Capital Infrastructure Committee TOPIC: Q2 Financial Update on Capital and Related Projects December 2, 2015 Appendix /15 & 2015/16 LONG TERM CAPITAL PLAN (NON IT) REMAINING PROJECTS Project Name Budget Year Approved Funding Q1 Funding Adjustments Revised Funding (A) Actual Costs 14/15 (B) 15/16 Actual Costs to Date Total Project Variance Total Projected Cost at Completion Total 15/16 Total 16/17 Total 17/18 Total 18/19 Projected Cost Projected Projected Cost Projected (October 26, 2015) (C) Cost (D) (E) Cost (F) (A-B-C-D-E-F) (B+C+D+E+F) ADAPTATIONS, RENOVATIONS AND MAJOR RENEWAL MC C308 Classroom Renovation 14/15 $ 24,016 $ 24,016 $ 12,201 $ 24,016 $ - $ 24,016 CDH Facility Plan- Design 14/15 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 4,010 $ 7,217 $ 21,325 $ - $ (335) $ 25,335 Library 6th Floor Group Learning Space 15/16 $ 105,000 $ 105,000 $ 3,359 $ 72,001 $ 101,641 $ - $ - $ 105,000 A207,A242,E208 Marketing/Comm. Renovations 15/16 $ - $ 22,673 $ 22,673 $ 15,995 $ 22,673 $ - $ 22,673 MC C405 and C407 Classroom Renovation 15/16 $ - $ 30,278 $ 30,278 $ 16,145 $ 30,278 $ - $ 30,278 MIWSFPA- Thistle Upgrades 15/16 $ 776,299 $ 776,299 $ 112,157 $ 776,299 $ - $ 776,299 MIWSFPA- Glenridge/East Academic Upgrades 15/16 $ 372,036 $ 372,036 $ 13,204 $ 537,321 $ (165,285) $ 537,321 MIWSFPA- Schmon Tower Upgrades 15/16 $ 269,318 $ 269,318 $ 2,766 $ 269,318 $ - $ 269,318 MIWSFPA- SOS Theatre Upgrades 15/16 $ 107,347 $ 107,347 $ 103,482 $ 107,347 $ - $ 107,347 EA Seminar Room and Flat Classroom Renewal 15/16 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 EA Learning Space ITS/AV Modernization 15/16 $ 190,000 $ 190,000 $ 14,124 $ 159,493 $ 175,876 $ - $ 190,000 CDH Facilities Plan-Construction 15/16 $ 179,000 $ 179,000 $ 517 $ 0 $ - $ 178,483 $ - $ 179,000 Washroom Upgrades - MC Chown 15/16 $ - $ - $ - $ 45,000 $ (45,000) $ 45,000 Total Adaptations, Renovations and Major Renewal $ 2,148,016 $ 52,951 $ 2,200,967 $ 22,010 $ 514,661 $ 2,211,094 $ 178,483 $ - $ - $ (210,620) $ 2,411,587 AODA (ACCESSIBLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT) Jubilee Court & Decew Ramps 14/15 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 5,042 $ 81,846 $ 119,958 $ - $ 125,000 Single Use Accessible Washroom Call Stations 14/15 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 3,309 $ 25,000 $ - $ 25,000 Exterior Paths of Travel (Design of Public Spaces) 14/15 $ 95,000 $ 95,000 $ 14,758 $ 7,189 $ 15,242 $ 65,000 $ - $ 95,000 Exterior Routes of Travel 15/16 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ 10,000 $ 15,000 $ - $ 25,000 Life Safety-Visual Alarms (WC,TA,BRIC,WH) 15/16 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ 7,000 $ 18,000 $ - $ 25,000 Parking Curb Cuts/Accessible Spaces 15/16 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ - $ 5,000 $ 10,000 $ - $ 15,000 Traditional Residences Auto Door Operators 15/16 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ - $ 10,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ 60,000 Total AODA $ 370,000 $ - $ 370,000 $ 19,800 $ 92,345 $ 192,200 $ 158,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 370,000 ENERGY CONSERVATION & DEMAND MANAGEMENT CBF Supply and Exhaust Air Improvements (CFHBRC) 14/15 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 1,158 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ 100,000 Energy Audits for Key Buildings and Areas 14/15 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 11,363 $ 5,979 $ 13,637 $ (5,000) $ 25,000 Lighting Conversion Main Campus 14/15 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 336 $ 5,138 $ 96,899 $ (67,235) $ 97,235 Water Treatment Review (CFHBRC) 14/15 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ - $ 7,500 $ 2,500 $ - $ 10,000 Total Energy Conservation & Demand Management $ 160,000 $ - $ 160,000 $ 11,699 $ 12,275 $ 168,036 $ 52,500 $ - $ - $ (72,235) $ 232,235 AUDITS & STUDIES Athletics & Rec.Services Facility Needs Study 14/15 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ - $ 35,000 $ - $ 35,000 Residence Reserve Fund Study 14/15 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 69,173 $ 200,000 $ - $ 200,000 Campus Plan Update 14/15 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 13,201 $ 55,107 $ 186,799 $ - $ 200,000 Reserve Fund Studies (Schmon Tower et al) 14/15 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 5,894 $ 25,000 $ - $ 25,000 Facility Condition Audits (VFA) 15/16 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 10,146 $ 75,000 $ - $ 75,000 Parking Lot Audit/Master Plan 15/16 $ 53,500 $ 53,500 $ - $ 53,500 $ - $ 53,500 Total Audits & Studies $ 588,500 $ - $ 588,500 $ 13,201 $ 140,321 $ 575,299 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 588,500 OTHER Move 3 Corten Sculptures to MIWSFPA 14/15 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 894 $ 2,513 $ 31,106 $ (7,000) $ 32,000 Gateway - LED Messaging Sign 14/15 $ 95,000 $ 95,000 $ - $ 95,000 $ - $ 95,000 Gateway Furniture 14/15 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 265,051 $ 291,000 $ 9,000 $ 291,000 Replace Sankey Chairs and Tables 14/15 $ 36,560 $ 36,560 $ - $ 36,560 $ - $ 36,560 Restoration of Path of Possibilities Sculpture 14/15 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ - $ 10,000 "2000 Years" Relocation 15/16 $ - $ - $ 1,292 $ 43,500 $ (43,500) $ 43,500 Total Other $ 466,560 $ - $ 466,560 $ 894 $ 268,856 $ 497,166 $ 10,000 $ - $ - $ (41,500) $ 508,060 Page 3 of 6

79 APPENDIX / /16 LTCP Q2 Status Report as at October 26, 2015 Capital Infrastructure Committee TOPIC: Q2 Financial Update on Capital and Related Projects December 2, 2015 Appendix /15 & 2015/16 LONG TERM CAPITAL PLAN (NON IT) REMAINING PROJECTS Project Name Budget Year Approved Funding Q1 Funding Adjustments Revised Funding (A) Actual Costs 14/15 (B) 15/16 Actual Costs to Date Total Project Variance Total Projected Cost at Completion Total 15/16 Total 16/17 Total 17/18 Total 18/19 Projected Cost Projected Projected Cost Projected (October 26, 2015) (C) Cost (D) (E) Cost (F) (A-B-C-D-E-F) (B+C+D+E+F) RESIDENCE Furniture repl-residence 14/15 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,910 $ 109,692 $ (9,692) $ 109,692 Prox. Card access system - residence 14/15 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 134 $ 976 $ 149,866 $ - $ 150,000 Lowenberger Carpeting Replacement 15/16 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 4,648 $ 110,497 $ 113,899 $ 31,453 $ - $ 150,000 Village Fire Alarm/Emergency Notification 15/16 $ 1,140,000 $ 1,140,000 $ 15,717 $ 786,250 $ 888,201 $ 236,082 $ 903,918 Village Residence Underground Conduit for Wireless System 15/16 $ 115,000 $ 115,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 115,000 $ - DeCew Lighting Retrofit 15/16 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,498 $ 4,575 $ 18,502 $ 180,000 $ - $ 200,000 Village Furniture Replacement 15/16 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 99,149 $ 99,149 $ - $ 851 $ 99,149 Lowenberger Cladding Replacement 15/16 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 20,000 $ 180,000 $ - $ 200,000 Village Exterior Court Lighting (Final Phase) 15/16 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 27,626 $ 22,374 $ 27,626 Miscellaneous Bedroom Painting (Res) 15/16 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ 150,000 Miscellaneous Public Area Painting (Res) 15/16 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000 Village Interior Renewal (Painting,Furniture,Carpeting,Blinds) 15/16 $ 67,500 $ 67,500 $ - $ - $ - $ 67,500 $ - $ 67,500 Decew Painting Renewal 15/16 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 Total Residence $ 2,572,500 $ - $ 2,572,500 $ 21,997 $ 1,102,357 $ 1,426,935 $ 758,953 $ - $ - $ 364,615 $ 2,207,885 VEHICLES Small Equipment 15/16 $ 32,000 $ 32,000 $ 19,493 $ 32,000 $ - $ 32,000 Maintenance & Utilities Replacement Vehicles 15/16 $ 28,500 $ 28,500 $ - $ 35,063 $ (6,563) $ 35,063 Main Campus Restricted New & Replacement Vehicles 15/16 $ 28,000 $ 28,000 $ 15,667 $ 21,000 $ 7,000 $ 21,000 Total Vehicles $ 88,500 $ - $ 88,500 $ - $ 35,159 $ 88,063 $ - $ - $ - $ 437 $ 88,063 Total Remaining 2014/15 & 2015/16 Projects $ 38,002,838 $ 106,985 $ 38,109,823 $ 1,041,826 $ 4,324,283 $ 12,090,276 $ 9,887,936 $ 15,250,000 $ 150,000 $ (310,215) $ 38,420, /15 & 2015/16 LONG TERM CAPITAL PLAN (NON IT) $ 40,965,443 $ 119,092 $ 41,084,535 $ 3,102,412 $ 4,903,690 $ 12,669,683 $ 9,887,936 $ 15,250,000 $ 150,000 $ 24,504 $ 41,060,031 Page 4 of 6

80 APPENDIX / /16 LTCP Q2 Status Report as at October 26, 2015 Capital Infrastructure Committee TOPIC: Q2 Financial Update on Capital and Related Projects December 2, 2015 Appendix /15 & 2015/16 LONG TERM CAPITAL PLAN (IT) COMPLETED PROJECTS Project Name Budget Year Q1 Sept/15 Approved Funding Q1 Funding Adjustments Approved Funding (A) 14/15 Actual Costs (B) 15/16 Actual Costs to October 26, 2015 (C) Project Variance (A-B-C) Cost at Completion Bookstore move to Chase PaymenTech 14/15 $ 20,000 $ - $ 20,000 $ 37,034 $ - $ (17,034) $ 37,034 Security (Door Security) 14/15 $ 30,000 $ - $ 30,000 $ 29,155 $ - $ 845 $ 29,155 UPS Replacement - Batteries 14/15 $ 35,000 $ - $ 35,000 $ 34,578 $ - $ 422 $ 34,578 CCTV Evergreening 14/15 $ 25,000 $ - $ 25,000 $ 27,044 $ - $ (2,044) $ 27,044 CATV 14/15 $ 10,000 $ - $ 10,000 $ 9,799 $ - $ 201 $ 9,799 Computer Redeployment 14/15 $ 186,000 $ - $ 186,000 $ 185,832 $ - $ 168 $ 185,832 Audio Visual BAU /15 $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000 $ 48,842 $ 118 $ 1,040 $ 48,960 Space Planning - Archibus 14/15 $ 34,331 $ - $ 34,331 $ 1,705 $ 35,502 $ (2,876) $ 37,207 Incident Management Software 14/15 $ 32,600 $ - $ 32,600 $ 31,873 $ 544 $ 183 $ 32,417 Disk Storage Replacement 14/15 $ 21,009 $ - $ 21,009 $ 111 $ 3,776 $ 17,122 $ 3,887 Contract Management 14/15 $ 55,000 $ (55,000) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Wireless Administrative - EG 15/16 $ 102,000 $ - $ 102,000 $ - $ 101,838 $ 162 $ 101,838 Telephone System - Administrative 15/16 $ 1,800 $ - $ 1,800 $ - $ 1,118 $ 682 $ 1,800 Total Completed IT Projects $ 602,740 $ (55,000) $ 547,740 $ 405,973 $ 142,896 $ (1,129) $ 549, /15 & 2015/16 LONG TERM CAPITAL PLAN (IT) REMAINING PROJECTS Project Name Budget Year Approved Funding Q1 Funding Adjustments Revised Funding (A) 14/15 Actual Costs (B) 15/16 Actual Costs to Date Total Project Variance Total Projected Cost at Completion Total 15/16 Total 16/17 Projected Cost Projected (C) Cost (D) (October 26, 2015) (A-B-C-D) (B+C+D) IT INFRASTRUCTURE Sharepoint Infrastructure Cloud Readiness Cloud Student Microsoft Dynamics/CRM 14/15 14/15 14/15 14/15 $ 71,000 $ 55,000 $ 126,000 $ 24,437 $ 26,067 $ 101,563 $ - $ - $ 126,000 $ 29,000 $ - $ 29,000 $ - $ - $ 29,000 $ - $ - $ 29,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ 25,000 $ 15,331 $ - $ 7,669 $ - $ 2,000 $ 23,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 PCI Compliance 15/16 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ - $ - $ 45,000 $ - $ - $ 45,000 Office & Lab Renovations 15/16 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ - $ 2,278 $ 40,000 $ 20,000 $ - $ 60,000 Total IT Infrastructure $ 280,000 $ 55,000 $ 335,000 $ 39,768 $ 28,345 $ 273,232 $ 20,000 $ 2,000 $ 333,000 IT EVERGREENING Network Switches BAU - Evergreening - Residence 14/15 14/15 $ 325,000 $ - $ 325,000 $ 173,703 $ 17,581 $ 151,297 $ - $ - $ 325,000 $ 373,992 $ - $ 373,992 $ 170,947 $ 67,192 $ 203,045 $ - $ - $ 373,992 Network Switches - Administrative - EG 15/16 $ 42,800 $ 42,800 $ - $ 61 $ 42,800 $ - $ - $ 42,800 Network Switches - Residences - EG 15/16 $ 53,950 $ 53,950 $ - $ - $ 53,950 $ - $ - $ 53,950 Network Switches - Residences - Growth 15/16 $ 13,000 $ 13,000 $ - $ - $ 13,000 $ - $ - $ 13,000 Network Applicances - Administrative - Growth 15/16 $ 45,000 $ 25,000 $ 70,000 $ - $ 60,024 $ 70,000 $ - $ - $ 70,000 A.V. (Including Video Conferencing) - Growth 15/16 $ 20,250 $ 20,250 $ - $ 13,517 $ 20,250 $ - $ - $ 20,250 A.V. (Including Video Conferencing) - EG 15/16 $ 48,400 $ 48,400 $ - $ 35,989 $ 48,400 $ - $ - $ 48,400 Wireless Administrative - Growth 15/16 $ 42,500 $ 42,500 $ - $ 33,444 $ 42,500 $ - $ - $ 42,500 Wireless Residence - EG 15/16 $ 55,250 $ 55,250 $ - $ 39,907 $ 55,250 $ - $ - $ 55,250 Gateway Residence 15/16 $ - $ 64,000 $ 64,000 $ - $ 9,098 $ 64,000 $ - $ - $ 64,000 Wireless Residence - Growth 15/16 $ 264,000 $ 264,000 $ - $ 212,665 $ 264,000 $ - $ - $ 264,000 Cable Television System - Residence 15/16 $ 4,500 $ 4,500 $ - $ - $ 4,500 $ - $ - $ 4,500 Telephone System - Residence 15/16 $ 1,800 $ 1,800 $ - $ - $ 1,800 $ - $ - $ 1,800 Disk Storage Growth 15/16 $ 237,750 $ 237,750 $ - $ - $ 237,750 $ - $ - $ 237,750 Data Back-Up - EG 15/16 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ - $ - $ 45,000 $ - $ - $ 45,000 Security Door Consolidation 15/16 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ - $ - $ 45,000 $ - $ - $ 45,000 Cameras & Alarm Systems - EG 15/16 $ 22,500 $ 22,500 $ - $ - $ 22,500 $ - $ - $ 22,500 Computer Purchase & Redeployment Program 15/16 $ 255,000 $ 10,000 $ 265,000 $ - $ - $ 265,000 $ - $ - $ 265,000 Total IT Evergreening $ 1,895,692 $ 99,000 $ 1,994,692 $ 344,650 $ 489,477 $ 1,650,042 $ - $ - $ 1,994,692 Page 5 of 6

81 APPENDIX / /16 LTCP Q2 Status Report as at October 26, 2015 Capital Infrastructure Committee TOPIC: Q2 Financial Update on Capital and Related Projects December 2, 2015 Appendix /15 & 2015/16 LONG TERM CAPITAL PLAN (IT) REMAINING PROJECTS Project Name Budget Year Approved Funding Q1 Funding Adjustments Revised Funding (A) 14/15 Actual Costs (B) 15/16 Actual Costs to Date Total Project Variance Total Projected Cost at Completion Total 15/16 Total 16/17 Projected Cost Projected (C) Cost (D) (October 26, 2015) (A-B-C-D) (B+C+D) IT SOFTWARE Microsoft Project Server 14/15 Education Desktop/365 14/15 Conversion Of Analog Cameras 14/15 $ 10,000 $ - $ 10,000 $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ 90,000 $ - $ 90,000 $ - $ 758 $ 90,000 $ - $ - $ 90,000 $ 72,000 $ - $ 72,000 $ 61,434 $ 3,980 $ 10,566 $ - $ - $ 72,000 Campus Security Incident/Dispatch Reporting Software 15/16 $ 40,500 $ 40,500 $ - $ - $ 40,500 $ - $ - $ 40,500 Software Development Tools For AODA 15/16 $ 22,500 $ 22,500 $ - $ - $ 22,500 $ - $ - $ 22,500 Configuration Management Software 15/16 $ 18,000 $ 18,000 $ - $ - $ 18,000 $ - $ - $ 18,000 Architecture Planning Tool 15/16 $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ - $ - $ 13,500 $ - $ - $ 13,500 Finance System Replacement 15/16 $ 3,800,000 $ 3,800,000 $ - $ 70,799 $ 3,130,923 $ 669,077 $ - $ 3,800,000 Total IT Software $ 4,066,500 $ - $ 4,066,500 $ 61,434 $ 75,537 $ 3,335,989 $ 669,077 $ - $ 4,066,500 Total Remaining IT Projects $ 6,242,192 $ 154,000 $ 6,396,192 $ 445,852 $ 593,359 $ 5,259,263 $ 689,077 $ 2,000 $ 6,394,192 TOTAL 2014/15 & 2015/16 LONG TERM CAPITAL PLAN (IT) $ 6,844,932 $ 99,000 $ 6,943,932 $ 851,825 $ 736,255 $ 5,402,159 $ 689,077 $ 871 $ 6,943,743 RESERVE Residence 13/14 & 14/15 $ 2,050,000 $ - $ 2,050,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 1,050,000 $ 1,000,000 Total Reserve $ 2,050,000 $ - $ 2,050,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 1,050,000 $ 1,000,000 Page 6 of 6

82 15 Board of Trustees Report to the Capital Infrastructure Committee Decision Item TOPIC: Goodman School of Business Rendering December 2, 2015 Tom Saint-Ivany, Associate Vice-President, Facilities Management Roland Mech, Interim Director, Campus Planning, Design & Construction Services Carlos Midence, Project Manager, Campus Planning, Design & Construction Services MOTION That the Capital Infrastructure Committee direct Staff to continue with the design of the Goodman School of Business in accordance to the University s design guidelines and objectives as outlined in the Adhering to Brock University s Built Form Guidelines report and illustrated in the accompanying rendering prepared by +VG Architects. BACKGROUND The Goodman School of Business project has an over-riding goal to deliver a renewed and expanded facility for the start of the academic year in September VG Architects started detailed design work for this project in June An integrated Design Process (IDP) began this summer, coordinated by the Campus Planning, Design and Construction Services Project Manager, with the participation of representatives of the Goodman School of Business and the Architects. Holding weekly meetings, the main purpose of the IDP is to ensure that, as project design progresses, the University s design guidelines are met as well as the Faculty s program requirements. Schematic design documents and a Class C estimate have been prepared and are currently under review. We have received Faculty sign off on the floor plan layouts. The schematic design and costing package will be presented at the December 10 th Project Steering Committee meeting for comment and approval. DISCUSSION The IDP has allowed the early formation of an interdisciplinary team, ensuring that necessary expertise is present at times when is most required. From the beginning of their assignment, +VG Architects, continued to reference Brock s specific design requirements and particularly by those included in Brock University Campus Plan, which also includes the Built Form Guidelines section. This section outlines design requirements for new buildings and how open spaces are to have a harmonious relationship with surrounding areas. Appendix 1 summarizes how the design is aligned with these guidelines and how they have been applied in this project. Reference has also been made to the University s Shaping our Future document that includes a guide to the planning, design and architecture of the natural and built environments. 1/2

83 An updated rendering of the new project has been prepared which illustrates the overall design intent, corrected number of floors and the building s overall relationship with surrounding areas. (Appendix 2). Management does not have a specific record of what opportunities, either internal to or external to the Goodman School of Business, were used to present this rendering and that, directly or indirectly, would have enabled feedback on it. In addition to providing renderings to the Project Steering Committee, an earlier, but not dissimilar, design concept rendering was included in the May 6, 2015 (In Camera) Topic Report Goodman Building Alternative Plan. APPENDICES Appendix 1 Adhering to Brock University s Built Form Guidelines (3 pages) Appendix 2 Goodman School of Business Rendering (1 pages) 2/2

84 GOODMAN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS RENOVATIONS AND ADDITIONS TO TARO HALL ADHERING TO BROCK UNIVERSITY S BUILT FORM GUIDELINES During the preliminary planning and design stage of the Goodman School of Business project at Taro Hall, +VG have been reviewing design decisions against the university s design guidelines and objectives as described in the Campus Plan (February 2003) and the goals of the Shaping Our Future (April 2007) document. The following summarizes the University s objectives as described in section 2.8 Built Form Guidelines of the Campus Plan and how the GSB design addresses these objectives where they are applicable: Guideline Design Response 1. New buildings will be 3 to 6 storeys Existing and new additions are three storeys. The west addition is planned for a future vertical expansion to 4 storeys. 2. Buildings facing Brock Mall and Brock Circle will be a minimum of 5 storeys. 3. Consider future build-out of the development parcel. 4. Material and colour palette facing Brock Mall is to use a consistent material and colour palette including stone. 5. Residential buildings in the Village are to be red brick 6. Bold and modern expression in keeping with the existing academic buildings 7. Windows and glazed walls will be transparent, not mirrored 8. New blank walls are not to face important exterior spaces. 9. Building entrances will be clearly identified. 10. Floor levels at entrance ways will align with adjacent ground levels. 11. Develop building additions that repair poorly defined existing exterior spaces. 12. Development Parcels 3, 11, 18, 19 & 20 are to have pavilion buildings Current development along Brock Mall has not achieved this objective as yet. The addition facing the Mall is designed to accommodate a 4 storey structure. The project is within development parcel 6 which has already seen the addition of Plaza Building. The additions to Taro Hall provide further capacity on the development parcel. The design of additions to Taro Hall anticipate the use of stone panels. Not applicable The additions to Taro Hall will be modern and sympathetic to the neighbouring academic buildings. The new additions will utilize transparent glass providing connections between interior and exterior. New walls facing west and south will not be blank walls. The new main entrance is highly visible and aligns with the existing exterior east west pedestrian walkway. New entrance ways align with adjacent ground levels. The west side addition provides an improved edge along the Mall with improved definition of the street edge. Not applicable

85 GOODMAN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS RENOVATIONS AND ADDITIONS TO TARO HALL ADHERING TO BROCK UNIVERSITY S BUILT FORM GUIDELINES Guideline 13. On many development parcels, landmark building elements are called for. Design Response Given the proximity to Schmon Tower, the west side addition will utilize a simple and clean expression to maintain legibility of the Brock mall and the university main entrance. Shaping Our Future is a document that focuses on directions for planning, design, sustainability and continued integration with the natural environment for the Brock Campus. The following are key points applicable to the design: Goals Design Response Urban Design and Architecture Pursue the development of a highly compact campus; Pursue contemporary design that is harmonious and respectful of existing buildings Develop buildings that respond to the context of the site. The additions and intensification of the Taro Hall site maintains furthers this goal. The new additions respect the height and massing of the adjacent Taro Hall. The new additions respond to the adjacent open spaces of the site Encourage the interplay between the The west addition and south facing inside and outside of buildings to link are highly transparent, glassy enhance facility users contact with natural surroundings and encourage the use of natural light. elements that reveal the buildings activity to the campus and participate in the adjacent landscape spaces Design building spaces that are functional and flexible with the opportunity for expansion and revision as the university The west side addition is designed for future vertical expansion and the east side addition is designed with column grows and changes. free spaces to anticipate future classroom uses Ensure that instructional and non-office space are designed to support formal and informal gathering. All the new teaching spaces utilize flat floors and flexible layouts to ensure a variety of arrangements Pursue the integration of innovative The new teaching spaces will building technology. incorporate the latest technologies based upon faculty and facility stakeholder input Promote the use of building materials that minimize health risks Materials will be selected that are durable and will minimize VOC s Encourage the creation of landmark The atrium of the west addition is

86 GOODMAN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS RENOVATIONS AND ADDITIONS TO TARO HALL ADHERING TO BROCK UNIVERSITY S BUILT FORM GUIDELINES Goals buildings in key and appropriate locations Encourage the creation of new open spaces by placing new buildings appropriately Consider Value Engineering and Life Cycle analysis for new facilities Integrate universal design to ensure that all buildings are accessible to all people Including those with disabilities Integrate the principles of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) Open Space and Public Realm When designing new facilities, consider the creation of open spaces and courtyards with unique identity that encourage gathering Promote connections between exterior and interior space on campus. Design Response intended to provide the new face of the Goodman School of Business within the Brock Mall. The west side addition intends to take advantage of the existing underused courtyard on the north side of Taro Hall as an outdoor amenity for staff, students and visitors. All design decisions consider these factors. The project will ensure all new spaces and most existing spaces will meet current standards. All design features consider CPTED. As mentioned above, the design anticipates greater use of the existing north side courtyard as a gathering space. The additions are located directly off of existing exterior pedestrian routes enabling better connections

87

88 15 Board of Trustees Report to the Capital Infrastructure Committee Information Item TOPIC: Schmon Tower Student Services Atrium Project Architect Procurement & Pre-Design Phase December 2, 2015 Tom Arkell, Associate Vice-President, University Services Tom Saint-Ivany, Associate Vice-President, Facilities Management BACKGROUND The proposed Schmon Tower Student Services Atrium presents a significant opportunity to create an inviting front door to campus. This initiative will add a large central indoor space that complements and engages with the existing Tower building. The transparent enclosure would continue the University s practice of open walls and serves as an extension to the Brock Mall landscape. The space is intended to accommodate at-hand student services and amenities at the heart of the campus and, in so doing, providing a renewed and re-vitalized hub for students, faculty, staff, visitors and transit users. At the October 1, 2015 Board of Trustees Meeting it was resolved that preliminary project approval be given for the Schmon Tower Student Services Atrium Project for the purposes of enabling Management to undertake a Request for Proposal process for a Prime Consultant to provide professional architectural, engineering and related services for those future phases of project development that the Board of Trustees may approve at a later date. DISCUSSION Request for Pre-Qualification Submittals. The Request for Pre-Qualification for Architectural Consulting Services (Architectural Services including: structural, mechanical and electrical engineering, as well as cost consulting services) for the Schmon Tower Student Services Atrium project RFPQ No EG15-23 was issued on October 16, 2015 via MERX (a national on-line procurement tool). A total of 25 proposals were received on the November 2, 2015 submission due date. Of the 25 proposals, one was received late and returned unopened resulting in 24 eligible and compliant proposals to be evaluated. Evaluation and Top-ranked Proponents. The evaluation team, comprised of Facilities Management and University Services Staff, evaluated the 24 proposals based upon the evaluation criteria set out in the RFPQ. Evaluation scoring results were compiled and tabulated in an Evaluation Summary spreadsheet and the evaluation process included reference checks for all of the top-ranked proponents. As stipulated in the RFPQ, a maximum of six proponents will be pre-qualified and invited to participate in the RFP process. The successful top-ranked proponents, in alphabetical order, are as follows: 1/2

89 Diamond Schmitt Architects Hariri Pontarini Architects IBI Group Architects Moriyama & Teshima Architects Perkins + Will Inc. RDH Architects Inc. NEXT STEPS An RFP will be issued to the pre-qualified proponents for full consulting services for all stages of the $8.6 million dollar (construction budget) project. Selection of the Architectural team will be based on evaluation criteria (outlined in the RFP), the fee proposal and an interview process. The RFP process will be in compliance with the Broader Public Sector Procurement Directive. It will be clearly identified that the University only intends to enter into contract with the successful proponent for Preliminary-design services at this time. Preliminary-design services will include developing a functional program for the proposed use of the new space, a preliminary design concept, a Class D order of magnitude cost estimate and a photorealistic rendering. The Capital and Related Project Budget report, presented today, includes $50,000 for the purposes of undertaking the Preliminary-design Services (Stage 1), to be performed by the selected Prime Consultant, using LTCP FY 16/17 funding upon Board approval to award to the recommended Prime Consultant and to proceed with Stage 1 Preliminary-design Services. The remaining phases of service would be quoted as a percentage fee to be calculated against the agreed upon construction budget once approval to proceed with the next phase or phases of the project has been obtained (Appendix 1, Table 1). APPENDIX Appendix 1 Key Milestones and Schedule Estimate (1 page) 2/2

90 Capital Infrastructure Committee TOPIC: Schmon Tower Student Services Atrium Project Architect Procurement & Pre-Design Phase December 2, 2015 Appendix 1 KEY MILESTONES AND SCHEDULE ESTIMATE The key Tasks, their grouping, and time estimates for approvals and undertaking the sequenced stages, upon approval(s) for each stage(s), involved in delivering the Schmon Tower Student Services Atrium project are shown in Table 1. Task Date Duration Cumulative Time 1. Board Approval to retain Prime Consultant Team Architect, Structural, Mechanical, Electrical and Cost Consultant October 1, months 2. RFPQ period for Prime Consultant Team October 16, month 3. RFP period for Prime Consultant Team (full Architectural Services with phased approvals) December 7, months 4. LTCP Funding Approval for Stage 1 Cycle #2 Dec 3, Stage 1 - Board Approval for Pre-design Board Approval to proceed with Preliminary Design Services Phase and Prime Consultant Award 6. Stage 1 - Preliminary Design Services Phase Functional Program Preliminary Design Class D Estimate Cycle #3 Mar 9, 2016 or Executive Committee Spring months 8 months 7. LTCP Funding Approval for Stage 2 TBD 8. Stage 2 Board Approval for Design TBD Board Approval to proceed with Design Services Phase Schematic Design Phase Design Development Phase Construction Document Phase 2.5 months 2.5 months 4.5 months 17.5 months 9. LTCP Funding Approval for Stage 3 TBD 10. Stage 3- Project Approval for Tender and Construction Tender period 11. Recommendation to Board for Award General Contractor TBD TBD 2 months 19.5 months 12. Construction Start TBD 0.5 month 20 months 13. Construction Period (phased) TBD 15 months 35 months 14. Occupancy TBD 1 month 36 months Table 1

91 Board of Trustees Report to the Capital Infrastructure Committee Information Item TOPIC: Residence Facility Condition Index December 2, 2015 Tom Arkell, Associate Vice-President, University Services Tom Saint-Ivany, Associate Vice-President, Facilities Management BACKGROUND Beginning in May 2015, and over the past several months, the Department of Residences and Facilities Management have worked to complete a comprehensive facility condition audit of all residence facilities. The audit was recently completed, a detailed report prepared, and the University s data in Accruent LLC s VFA capital asset management software database (used by Ontario universities) was updated. Definitions used in facility condition audits and assessments, standardized to the extent possible with Council of Ontario Universities (COU) Facility Condition Assessment Program (FCAP) reporting, are provided at Appendix 1. FACILITY CONDITION AUDIT RESULTS The results are in line with expectations in that the oldest residence, DeCew, had the poorest ratings (FCI 0.33, RI 0.39), while newer construction, such as Earp and Lowenberger Residences, had good ratings. An overview of the results is provided in Table 1, below. The VFA summary report can be found at Appendix 2. Residence 2015 VFA Update CRV DM FCI R RI Alan Earp $22,775,676 $1,461, $2,221, Arnie Lowenberger $26,410,160 $2,041, $2,886, DeCew & Dining Hall $46,575,483 $15,525, $18,261, Gordon & Betty Vallee $18,011,291 $1,668, $2,598, Village (avg. all units) $41,483,372 $5,111, $5,525, Quarry View (avg. all units) $17,134,522 $1,861, $1,905, TOTAL $172,390,504 $27,669, $33,399, DM: Deferred Maintenance FCI: Facility Condition Index (DM CRV) R: DM & Non-Deferred Maintenance Requirements RI: Requirements Index (R CRV) CRV: Current Replacement Value Table 1 1/3

92 As the COU FCAP reporting excludes residences, comparator system indices (with those shown in Table 1) for residences are not readily available. The 2014 COU FCAP (excluding residences and facilities rented/leased) system FCI is 0.11 and the system RI is 0.13 and for Brock University, the FCI is 0.18 and the RI is If the results for the DeCew Residence and Dining Hall are considered an anomaly (taking into account age and maintainability); overall, the FCI and RI results for the residence portfolio is indicative of good stewardship and good levels of re-capitalization that, together, have kept deferred maintenance in check over the years. STUDENT SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS SUMMARY RESIDENCES From the data in the 2014 Student Satisfaction Survey Results Summary (Appendix 3), one can see that students living in Earp and Vallee had the highest satistfaction with the facilities and overall experience, while students living in Quarry View and Village had the lowest satisfaction with both the facilities and overall. Aesthetically, Quarry View and Village are not pleasing and are in need of upgrades such as paint and carpeting. The nature of the contruction of these two buildings (drywall) do not make them as durable as the block and concrete construction in the traditional style buildings. This makes it difficult to keep them looking as good as the other buildings. The marked difference between satisfaction in terms of facilities and overall for the students in Lowenberger can be attributed to overall community issues encountered in the building for that year, that the Residence Life Team were managing. Overall, students living in DeCew were marginally more satisfied with the facilities of the building but did have a higher overall satisfaction rate than most of the other buildings. This may be attributed to the community that develops in DeCew Residence. Anecdotally, Residence staff know from students that, while DeCew is in need of upgrading, they love the design of the building and how it contributes to developing strong friendships and connections with other students. While the FCI for DeCew is higher than for the other Residence facilities; given the satisfaction with DeCew, there is some time before significant recapitalization decisions need to be made and resources allocated. CONCLUSION This latest facility condition data will provide valuable information and guidance on the capital renewal requirements in the residences portfolio and provide content into the rolling five-year Long Term Capital Plan (LTCP). Deferred maintenance and capital renewal are expected to be major points of discussion in the review and analysis of the content in the 1500-page VFA report. Both the facility condition data and the Student Satisfaction Survey results will be key pieces of information to be taken into consideration in the Student Residence Needs Analysis & Housing Master Plan. The outcomes of the recently awarded Student Residence Needs Analysis & Housing Master Plan will provide significant guidance and direction regarding residence facilities renewal for long-term capital planning purposes. Management recognizes that it is reasonable to expect that investments in residence facilities would increase levels of student satisfaction. 2/3

93 In making recommendations on the allocation of funds to capital requirements within the University s FY 16/17 LTCP, Management has taken into consideration: 1) the current state of Residence infrastructure, 2) the need to now assess the results of the facility condition audits, 3) indicative findings from the Student Satisfaction Survey, 4) the Housing Master Plan effort that is now underway, and 5) the finalization of the Campus Plan Update in January With 2016 being a year to synthesize these considerations and determine what, when, and how much to fund in future years; LTCP funding for Residences renewal is planned to be less in FY 16/17. APPENDICES Appendix 1 Facility Condition Audit Definitions (1 page) Appendix 2 VFA Residence Summary Report, Asset List (8 pages) Appendix 3 Student Satisfaction Survey Results Summary (2 pages) 3/3

94 FACILITY CONDITION AUDIT DEFINITIONS Capital Infrastructure Committee TOPIC: Residence Facility Condition Index December 2, 2015 Appendix 1 Deferred Maintenance (DM) Deferred maintenance is work that has been deferred on a planned or unplanned basis to a future budget cycle or postponed until funds become available. It includes the total dollar amount of existing major maintenance repairs and replacements, identified by a comprehensive facilities condition audit of buildings, grounds, fixed equipment and infrastructure needs. Facility Condition Index (FCI) The Facility Condition Index (FCI) is a standard facility management benchmark that provides an overall indicator of infrastructure condition. Condition is categorized, on the basis of the FCI, by the Council of Ontario uuiversities (COU) as follows: Excellent Condition FCI is less than 0.05 Fair Condition FCI is between 0.05 and 0.10 Poor Condition FCI is greater than 0.10 The Province s Ministry of Education (for K-12) further categorizes a FCI greater than 0.65 as being Prohibitive to Repair, indicative that the infrastructure should be completely replaced or disposed of Excellent Fair Poor Prohibitive to Repair Calculating FCI FCI = Deferred Maintenance $ (DM) Current Replacement Value $ (CRV) Requrements Index (RI) The Requirements Index (RI) is similar to FCI but includes more than priority deferred maintenance (DM) items. In addition to DM items, the RI includes short-term and long-term capital improvements and grandfathered code items in its calculations, such as replacement of equipment that has not yet reached their end of service life. Calculating RI RI = Sum of ALL Requirments in a Given Time $ (R) Current Replacement Value $ (CRV)

95 Asset List Report By Name Reporting Currency: CAD Adjustment Factor: 0% Region Name: Brock University - Residence Campus Name: Brock University-Residences-East Campus Asset Number Age Use Size Asset Type: Building Replacement Value Cost/ Unit FCI Cost FCI RI Cost RI Quarryview Block 1 QV-1 12 Residence 1,319 2,295,182 1, , , Asset Primary Photo Quarryview Block 2 QV-2 12 Residence 1,538 2,670,217 1, , , Quarryview Block 3 QV-3 12 Residence 2,343 3,614,948 1, , , Quarryview Block 4 QV-4 12 Residence 2,343 3,587,176 1, , , Quarryview Block 5 QV-5 12 Residence 1,472 2,293,403 1, , , Copyright 2015 VFA, Inc. All rights reserved. Nov 2, :19:01 AM Page 1 of 8

96 Asset List Report By Name Asset Number Age Use Size Replacement Value Cost/ Unit FCI Cost FCI RI Cost RI Quarryview Block 6 QV-6 12 Residence 1,758 2,673,595 1, , , Asset Primary Photo Subtotal for Building 10,773 17,134,522 1,591 1,861, ,905, Campus Name: Brock University-Residences-East Campus 17,134,522 1,861, ,905, Copyright 2015 VFA, Inc. All rights reserved. Nov 2, :19:01 AM Page 2 of 8

97 Asset List Report By Name Reporting Currency: CAD Adjustment Factor: 0% Region Name: Brock University - Residence Campus Name: Brock University-Residences-Main Campus Asset Number Age Use Size Asset Type: Building Alan Earp Residence Replacement Value Cost/ Unit FCI Cost FCI RI Cost RI ERP 14 Residence 9,224 22,775,676 2,469 1,461, ,221, Asset Primary Photo Arnie Lowenberger Residence LOW 12 Residence 10,219 26,410,160 2,584 2,041, ,886, DeCew Residence and Dining Hall DEC-1 46 Residence 14,289 46,575,483 3,260 15,525, ,261, Gordon & Betty Vallee Residence VAL 20 Residence 7,421 18,011,291 2,427 1,668, ,598, Village Residence - Building 10A VIL-10A 18 Residence ,012 2,237 28, , Copyright 2015 VFA, Inc. All rights reserved. Nov 2, :19:01 AM Page 3 of 8

98 Asset List Report By Name Asset Number Age Use Size Village Residence - Building 10B Replacement Value Cost/ Unit FCI Cost FCI RI Cost RI VIL-10B 18 Residence ,560 2,232 35, , Asset Primary Photo Village Residence - Building 10C VIL-10C 18 Residence ,560 2,232 35, , Village Residence - Building 10D VIL-10D 18 Residence ,560 2,232 38, , Village Residence - Building 11A VIL-11A 18 Residence ,012 2,237 28, , Village Residence - Building 11B VIL-11B 18 Residence ,560 2,232 28, , Village Residence - Building 11C VIL-11C 18 Residence ,560 2,232 38, , Copyright 2015 VFA, Inc. All rights reserved. Nov 2, :19:01 AM Page 4 of 8

99 Asset List Report By Name Asset Number Age Use Size Village Residence - Building 11D Replacement Value Cost/ Unit FCI Cost FCI RI Cost RI VIL-11D 18 Residence ,560 2,232 38, , Asset Primary Photo Village Residence - Building 12A VIL-12A 18 Residence ,560 2,232 38, , Village Residence - Building 12B VIL-12B 18 Residence ,560 2,232 38, , Village Residence - Building 12C VIL-12C 18 Residence 763 1,644,794 2,156 66, , Village Residence - Building 1A VIL-1A 28 Residence 833 1,884,668 2, , , Village Residence - Building 1B VIL-1B 28 Residence 763 1,668,138 2, , , Copyright 2015 VFA, Inc. All rights reserved. Nov 2, :19:01 AM Page 5 of 8

100 Asset List Report By Name Asset Number Age Use Size Village Residence - Building 2A Replacement Value Cost/ Unit FCI Cost FCI RI Cost RI VIL-2A 28 Residence 833 1,856,461 2, , , Asset Primary Photo Village Residence - Building 2B VIL-2B 28 Residence 763 1,668,138 2, , , Village Residence - Building 3A VIL-3A 28 Residence 833 1,884,668 2, , , Village Residence - Building 3B VIL-3B 28 Residence 763 1,668,138 2, , , Village Residence - Building 4A VIL-4A 28 Residence 833 1,884,668 2, , , Village Residence - Building 4B VIL-4B 28 Residence 763 1,668,138 2, , , Copyright 2015 VFA, Inc. All rights reserved. Nov 2, :19:01 AM Page 6 of 8

101 Asset List Report By Name Asset Number Age Use Size Village Residence - Building 5A Replacement Value Cost/ Unit FCI Cost FCI RI Cost RI VIL-5A 28 Residence 833 1,882,960 2, , , Asset Primary Photo Village Residence - Building 5B VIL-5B 28 Residence 763 1,668,138 2, , , Village Residence - Building 6A VIL-6A 28 Residence 833 1,884,668 2, , , Village Residence - Building 6B VIL-6B 28 Residence 763 1,668,138 2, , , Village Residence - Building 7A VIL-7A 23 Residence 833 1,884,132 2,262 88, , Village Residence - Building 7B VIL-7B 23 Residence 763 1,667,026 2,185 76, , Copyright 2015 VFA, Inc. All rights reserved. Nov 2, :19:01 AM Page 7 of 8

102 Asset List Report By Name Asset Number Age Use Size Replacement Value Cost/ Unit FCI Cost FCI RI Cost RI Asset Primary Photo Village Residence - Building 8A VIL-8A 23 Residence 833 1,884,132 2,262 88, , Village Residence - Building 8B VIL-8B 23 Residence 763 1,667,026 2,185 79, , Village Residence - Building 9A VIL-9A 23 Residence 763 1,667,026 2,185 76, , Village Residence - Building 9B VIL-9B 23 Residence ,809 2,259 44, , Subtotal for Building 59, ,255,982 2,595 25,807, ,493, Campus Name: Brock University-Residences-Main 155,255,982 25,807, ,493, Campus Region Name: Brock University - Residence 172,390,503 27,669, ,399, Summary 172,390,503 27,669, ,399, Copyright 2015 VFA, Inc. All rights reserved. Nov 2, :19:01 AM Page 8 of 8

103 Capital Infrastructure Committee TOPIC: Residence Facility Condition Index December 2, 2015 Appendix 3 STUDENT SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS SUMMARY The Skyfactor (formely EBI) Benchmarking assessment tool, used in the Student Satisfaction Survey, has 152 questions or factors measured including institution specific questions. These factors can be filtered down to various levels in order to drill-down in the data for a rich assessment. The charts below are the Facilities satisfaction level (Figure 1) and the Overall satisfaction level (Figure 2), by building, from the 2014 assessment. Figure 1 1/2

104 Capital Infrastructure Committee TOPIC: Residence Facility Condition Index December 2, 2015 Appendix 3 Figure 2 2/2

105 Board of Trustees Report to the Capital Infrastructure Committee Information Item TOPIC: Hamilton Campus December 2, 2015 Brian Hutchings, Vice-President, Administration EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Brock University operates a campus in Hamilton, Ontario. The campus is located at 1842 King Street East which is in the Rosedale neighbourhood of East Hamilton (Appendix 1). The school houses the Faculty of Education and is an essential part of that program with approximately 362 of the total 602 students in the Teacher Education program. The Department of Teacher Education offers the following programs: Primary/Junior, Junior/Intermediate, Intermediate/Senior and Technological Education. The campus sits on approximately 6.98 acres of land, which was appraised in 2013 for $4.9 million. The building has a deferred maintenance of $3.03 million and an FCI of 0.22, which is considered poor. The Faculty of Education has a very strong enrolment in Hamilton. The location allows many consecutive education students the convenience of attending school close to their respective home communities which for many is along the 401 stretch from Kitchener to Mississauga while being close to their placement schools. At this point, staff are reviewing the functional requirements of the Hamilton Campus to determine space requirements and further to make a decision on renovating existing space, acquiring or leasing space in the Hamilton or Burlington area. The timeline for this review will occur over the next 4-5 months. This decision and reasoning will be brought to the Board of Trustees for their information and/or decision in June APPENDIX Appendix 1 Map of Hamilton Campus (2 pages) Appendix 2 History of Hamilton Campus (1 page)

106 Capital Infrastructure Committee TOPIC: Hamilton Campus December 2, 2015 Appendix 1 1 1

107 2 2

108 History of Hamilton Campus Capital Infrastructure Committee TOPIC: Hamilton Campus December 2, 2015 Appendix 2 The presence of Brock s Teacher Education program in the Hamilton area dates from the mid-1960s. At that time, the previously independent teachers colleges were being folded into universities. McMaster declined to enter this field, so Brock stepped in to fill the vacuum in this area. In 1996, Brock purchased its existing building, located at 1842 King St. East, which is a former high school. This building has met Brock s needs fairly well. There is an adequate number of classrooms, computer labs, and faculty and staff offices. There is a well-equipped instructional resource centre. There is a gym with a stage and fairly spartan change rooms. The location is fairly easily accessible by car; less so by public transit. However, there are a number of problems with the existing facility. With the switch from the one-year to the two-year program, the building will be filled to capacity or possibly beyond. The existing parking lot is inadequate for peak loads which results in spillover parking in the neighbourhood which results in complaints from residents. With the advent of the two-year program, parking will move from an intermittent nuisance to a serious irritant for students and neighbourhood residents. The major issue is that the building requires significant repairs such as replacement of the roof and the original single-pane windows. A continued presence in the Hamilton area is important for the Teacher Education program. Currently 362 of our total 602 Teacher Education students take their courses at the Hamilton campus. These students are drawn from Hamilton/Burlington, the western and northern areas of the GTA, and west and north of Hamilton (Guelph, Waterloo). This will be an increasingly important source of students as the GTA remains a growth area while the population of Niagara grows more slowly. Brock s presence in this area is also important for our relationship with school boards that provide teaching placements for our students. Brock has relationships with both the public and Catholic school boards in Hamilton, Halton, Peel, and Grand Erie regions.

109 Board of Trustees Report to the Capital Infrastructure Committee Information Item TOPIC: New Accounting System Project Phoenix December 2, 2015 Bryan Boles, Associate Vice President, Finance Josh Sekel, Senior Project Manager BACKGROUND The University is implementing a cloud based accounting system and its related processes. The project is intended to improve the timelines, relevance and accuracy of information to support decision, streamline processes by implementing leading practices to improve the experience of those participating in financial transactions, and support a strong environment of internal control. When implementing, system customization will be limited. The project was formally approved by a joint meeting of the Executive Committee and the Capital Infrastructure Committee on September 3, The system is scheduled to go live May 1, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Since the last reporting on the project on September 30, 2015 and the time of writing this report the project team has been concentrating on achieving appropriate contracts with Workday, Deloitte and KPMG, the account structure, and planning for the introduction and training of the new accounting system. Some additional information on these topics are provided below and our standard project status update is presented in Appendix 1. Workday Contract Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP was utilized in the negotiations with Workday. The contract negotiations took longer than anticipated. The project team was able to adjust plans accordingly and while we are currently slightly behind schedule there is a plan to catch up. Presently the project is still considered to be delivered on time and on budget. The negotiated contract price for the new financial system was the quoted price received in the request for proposal. The contract negotiated is consistent with the direction provided by the joint committee and includes pricing for all the human resource and student information modules. The pricing has not been provided here for confidential reasons. Management can discuss the pricing should the committee desire to go in-camera. The costs of these systems along with a Facilitates Management System have been incorporated into the fiscal framework and long-term capital plan. We remind the committee that the Workday finance and human resources modules are fully developed and implemented but the majority of the student information modules remain in development until spring The only Workday student information modules currently deployed at Universities today are those associated with recruitment and admissions.

110 Workday has provided the University an option to get involved in the development at a small cost should there be an appetite. The following link is to a short video demonstrating the workday system with the Finance, human resource and student information modules all working together. Account Structure Financial Services, along with a number of other individuals from units across the University, have been working on reviewing the account structure of the University for well over a year in preparation of a move to a new accounting system. In Workday, the account structure is called a Financial Data Model (FDM). It works much like a normal linear account structure like our current account structure (Function-Cost Centre-Account) except the number of dimensions is greatly increased thanks to a system Workday calls tagging that essentially can jump linear lines as the account structure is built more like a 3-dimensional cube than a linear line. This will allow for enhanced reporting across expense types, projects, and functions. Key elements of the account structure have already been presented at the Council of Academic Deans Finance Committee where interest and support for the account structure was high. The project team has identified that the Workday community of other Universities is very willing to communicate and share experiences as hoped. This has been helpful as the team has been able to not only utilize the experience of Deloitte but other Universities that have already or are currently implementing. Introduction and training for the new system Given the project sets out a path that we will adopt the process of the technology with limited customization, we recognize there will be significant changes to the way people interact with the accounting system and do their job. As a result, the University has contracted an individual with an extensive background in change management and who has been significantly involved in three other successful system implementations in the past. The project team has been educated in the components of change management. See some of the standard change management type educational tools/charts below.

111 At the time of writing this report the change management plan is being finalized. While constant communication has been occurring at a number of committees across the University, broader level communication, information and training sessions are anticipated to begin as early as the end of November. APPENDIX Appendix 1 Project Status Update (1 page)

112 Project Phoenix Project Status Update October 30, 2015 Capital Infrastructure Committee TOPIC: New Accounting System - Project Phoenix December 2, 2015 Appendix 1 Brock University Project Status Completed 18% Change Orders 0 Project Goal The University is implementing a cloud based accounting system and its related processes. The project is intended to improve the timeliness, relevance and accuracy of information to support decision, streamline processes by implementing leading practices to improve the experience of those participating in financial transactions, and support a strong environment of internal control. When implementing, system customization will be limited. Budget (000's) Budget Committed Actual Phase 1 3,833 2, Phase Phase Subtotal 4,729 2, Contingency Total 4,800 2, Project Plan Top 5 outstanding issues Description Date Owner Priority Impact 1. HR data integration 28-Oct-15 HR/IT High High 2. Independent contractor T4As 28-Oct-15 Finance/IT High Moderate % complete Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Plan Project Charter 75% X X Project Plan 90% X Engagement Tools & Resources 75% X Tenant Strategy 85% X Project Kickoff 0% X Architect FDM Workshops 80% X Discovery Workshops (P0) 75% X Business Requirements Fit/Gap 0% X Functional Configuration Documentation 0% X Configure & Prototype Configure P1 Prototype Tenant 0% X P1 Tenant Prototype Review & Validation 0% X Develop Integration Specifications 0% X Develop Conversions 0% X X Configure P2 Prototype Tenant 0% X P2 Tenant Prototype Review & Validation 0% X X Develop Reports and Interfaces 0% X X X Test Configure P3 Prototype Tenant 0% X System Integration Testing 0% X Prepare UAT Tenant 0% X Conduct UAT Testing 0% X Conduct End User Training 0% X Conduct Cutover Dress Rehearsals 0% X Deploy Prepare Gold Production Tenant 0% X Execute Cutover 0% X Support Stabilize Solution 0% X Transition Support 0% X X Close Project 0% X Progress/Resolution Build staging table/ cleanse HR data IT to build a solution outside of Workday until HCM implementation

113 Capital Infrastructure Committee Goals and Objectives Progress Scorecard as at December 2, 2015 LEGEND: GREEN = COMMITMENTS COMPLETE YELLOW = COMMITMENTS IN PROGRESS AND ON TRACK RED = COMMITMENTS ARE NOT ON TRACK Item # C1 Source Action Goal Measurement Target Date Progress / Status Committee Charter Review 5 Year Accessible Built Environment progress against plan June 2016 Cycle 1: This process will commence in the Fall of 2015 with the ABE Committee. Cycle 2: Scheduled for discussion at the November 20, 2015 ABE Committee meeting. C2 C3 C4 C5 Committee Charter Committee Charter Committee Charter Committee Charter Review Emergency Management Plan and Emergency Preparedness changes or updates Receive and review in Cycle 5 Review Annual Campus Security Services Report Receive and review in Cycle 1 Review annual facilities condition audit and annual deferred maintenance report. Review multi-year funding plan to allow for appropriate levels of funding to reduce the University s deferred maintenance backlog including that for residences Review and approve the Five-Year Long Term Capital Plan Approve FY LTCP June 2016 Cycle 1: Report presented in June 2015, work has begun on the redrafting of the Emergency Management plan to reflect the I.M.S. model. Draft to be presented in Fall 2015 to V.P. Finance and Administration. Cycle 2: Draft is near completion of the combination to make up the new EMT (Emergency Management Team) revising the EMP (Emergency Management Plan) model. October 2015 Cycle 1: Report completed on agenda to be spoken to at Cycle 1 Wednesday Sept 30 th at CIC of the Board. Cycle 2: Report delivered at the Cycle 1 meeting. Discussions with the City of St. Catharines for security at PAC (Performing Arts Centre) underway. Metrics being refined in communication and statistics. Campus Security is now a part of the Sub-Committee Data Management. January 2016 Cycle 1: Ongoing as reported in the Cycle 1 Deferred Maintenance Update Topic Report. December 2015 C6 Review COU and MTCU reports April 2016 Cycle 1: Ongoing. Cycle 2: Review of Residence facility condition audit report underway by Residences and Facilities Management for LTCP planning. Cross-reference to Item # C21. Cycle 1: IT and non-it capital requirements for the 2016/17 LTCP will be presented at Cycle 2. Cycle 2: Draft FY 16/17 Plan has been coordinated with stakeholders and will be recommended for approval of capital requirements content and funding. November 20, 2015 Page 1 of 10!CIC_Progress Scorecard_ _Cycle 2v1.docx

114 Capital Infrastructure Committee Goals and Objectives Progress Scorecard as at December 2, 2015 LEGEND: GREEN = COMMITMENTS COMPLETE YELLOW = COMMITMENTS IN PROGRESS AND ON TRACK RED = COMMITMENTS ARE NOT ON TRACK Item # C7 C8 C9 C10 Source Action Goal Measurement Target Date Progress / Status Committee Charter Committee Charter Committee Charter Committee Charter Committee Charter Review annual report on sustainability-related plans and activities Review annual non-hazardous waste audit report Review annual energy conservation and demand management plan Receive advice from Senate as to what building and other facilities are required to meet the needs of the University Cycle 2: Ongoing. February 2016 Cycle 1: COU s draft 2014 Going Greener Report is being reviewed and it is anticipated to be issued this Fall. Cycle 2: COU s 2014 Going Greener Report was issued October 22, 2015 for discussion at the Sustainability Coordinating Committee November 26, April 2016 Cycle 1: A mini audit was conducted in August with the full annual audit to be done in December. Cycle 2: The annual Waste Audit was conducted October 19-30, Results are being reviewed for Cycle 3 reporting. April 2016 Cycle 1: The update of the ECDMP is underway for reporting at Cycle 3 with an emphasis on alternative energies and GHG reduction. Cycle 2: Action at Cycle 1 is continuing. May 2016 Cycle 1: No update. Cycle 2: No update. C11 C12 C13 Committee Charter Committee Charter Committee Charter Receive reports and review individual; major capital projects (total budget exceeding $1,000,000) and ensure that on-going operating costs have been included Receive results of an recommendations for post-occupancy evaluation surveys Receive and review those performance metrics that are indicative of the successful Ongoing October 2015 Cycle 1: Ongoing. Cycle 2: Ongoing. Cycle 1: The Associate Director, Space Management and Planning will be undertaking a follow-on POE for the CFHBRC for reporting at Cycle 2 and a POE for the MIWSFPA for reporting at Cycle 4. Cycle 2: A topic report on the CFHBRC POE follow-up has been prepared for the Cycle 2 CIC meeting. Cycle 1: These metrics are included in the Cycle 1 Department of Facilities Management Introduction Information Topic Report. November 20, 2015 Page 2 of 10!CIC_Progress Scorecard_ _Cycle 2v1.docx

115 Capital Infrastructure Committee Goals and Objectives Progress Scorecard as at December 2, 2015 LEGEND: GREEN = COMMITMENTS COMPLETE YELLOW = COMMITMENTS IN PROGRESS AND ON TRACK RED = COMMITMENTS ARE NOT ON TRACK Item # C14 C15 Source Action Goal Measurement Target Date Progress / Status President s Goals Committee Goals stewardship of the University s real property assets and the sustainment of an effective, accessible, safe and secure environment Review of governance model for administrative and academic service functions Implement on time and on budget a new accounting system Models for ITS function reviewed with recommendations for change, as appropriate System Selection December 2015 September 2015 Cycle 2: Completed. Cycle 1: No update. Cycle 2: Administration s proposal for IT Governance to address the President s goal will be presented shortly to SAC; see IT Governance report update to CIC. Cycle 1: Confidential report to Joint Executive Committee and Capital Infrastructure Committee was approved. Cycle 2: Contracts with provider (Workday) and implementer (Deloitte) signed; details can be found in the New Accounting System Project Phoenix update presented to CIC this cycle. Phase 1 Phase 2 Tentative May 2016 Tentative May 2017 Cycle 1: Budgeted timeline on track. Cycle 2: No change from Cycle 1. Cycle 1: Budgeted timeline on track. Cycle 2: No change from Cycle 1. C16 C17 Committee Goals Committee Goals Campus Plan is completed Develop a plan and approach for an updated Facility Needs and Priorities Review Plan complete by December 2015 December 2015 Cycle 1: This is on track for completion in December and reporting at the Cycle 2 meeting. An Open House for the University community is planned for January 2016 to inform of the outcomes. Cycle 2: The Draft Campus Plan update will be received by the University at the end of November and presented to the Cycle 2 CIC meeting with the finalized Campus Plan Update to be submitted to a special meeting(s) of CIC and Executive Committee in January. March 2016 Cycle 1: A request for a $300,000 allocation within the 2016/17 LTCP will be brought forward at Cycle 2. This will serve as the University s Space Plan. November 20, 2015 Page 3 of 10!CIC_Progress Scorecard_ _Cycle 2v1.docx

116 Capital Infrastructure Committee Goals and Objectives Progress Scorecard as at December 2, 2015 LEGEND: GREEN = COMMITMENTS COMPLETE YELLOW = COMMITMENTS IN PROGRESS AND ON TRACK RED = COMMITMENTS ARE NOT ON TRACK Item # Source Action Goal Measurement Target Date Progress / Status April 2017 Cycle 2: A reduced amount of $250,000 has been identified in the recommended FY 16/17 LTCP being brought forward at the Cycle CIC meeting. The draft RFP document has been prepared. C18 C19 C20 Committee Goals Committee Goals Committee Goals Ensure progress on the Goodman School of Business is on-time, on-budget and risks are identified and mitigation plans are in place Repurpose and renovate the Alumni Greenhouse into the new home for the ESRC and a future Sustainability Coordinator Residence master plan Substantial Performance of Work June 2018 Cycle 1: A Construction Manager is in place and efforts are now focused on design development. Risks (academic and construction) and their management are being assessed with mitigation measures being undertaken. The next milestone is completion of the schematic design and a Class C cost estimate by December Cycle 2: Schematic design documents are complete and Class C estimate is under review. On schedule. Plan in place March 2016 Cycle 1: This deferred maintenance project has been submitted into MTCU s Refresh of Capital Inventory Program. Further developmental work will be undertaken as part of the 2016/17 LTCP. Cycle 2: As part of the FY 16/17 LTCP planning and in consideration of the Facility Condition Index of 0.82 (prohibitive to repair), Management recommends that the building be removed and the site restored. EXRC space needs will be identified in the Facility Needs & Priorities Update study. Develop a longterm plan that includes market measurement and student desire. March 2015 Cycle 1: RFP issued on September 1, Final report and presentation: Early February Cycle 2: Consultant selected. Scoping meeting being scheduled. Topic sheet provides key milestones. C21 Committee Goals Residence facility condition index Develop a FCI for all buildings, and a long term plan December 2015 Cycle 1: FCI draft just received. This is to be reviewed for errors and omissions by Residences and FM. Once finalized, the top deferred maintenance issues will be identified according to risk and priority, and in conjunction with the outcomes residence November 20, 2015 Page 4 of 10!CIC_Progress Scorecard_ _Cycle 2v1.docx

117 Capital Infrastructure Committee Goals and Objectives Progress Scorecard as at December 2, 2015 LEGEND: GREEN = COMMITMENTS COMPLETE YELLOW = COMMITMENTS IN PROGRESS AND ON TRACK RED = COMMITMENTS ARE NOT ON TRACK Item # Source Action Goal Measurement Target Date Progress / Status for refurbishment or renovation. master plan, will be prioritized and identified on the 16/17 longterm capital plan. C22 C23 Committee Goals Committee Goals Parking & Transportation Develop a parking master plan and long term strategy Development East Lands Completion of a long term plan for use, redevelopment and refurbishment Development of a plan to remediate the lands and unlock the access. Cycle 2: See Item C4. FCI report has been reviewed and turned over to the residence master plan consultant for further review. April 2016 Cycle 1: RFP to be issued September 9, Final report and presentation: January Cycle 2: RFP was refined and issued in October. Final presentation is expected in February. Topic sheet provides key milestones. February 2016 Cycle 1: Planning for the East Lands development will follow the development of the Campus Master Plan and Region of Niagara University precinct plan. Cycle 2: A project team is being assembled to assist in land planning, environmental concerns and roadway access. C24 C25 Committee Goals Committee Goals Development Heritage Plaza Development Tower Atrium Redevelopment of the Heritage Plaza to increase density and revenue or space. Re-engineer the facility and explore other financing, construction and operation models. February 2016 Cycle 1: Planning for the Heritage Plaza redevelopment is progressing concurrently with the Campus Master Plan. A draft marketing package is currently being prepared. Cycle 2: The project is being further defined and consultations are underway to understand the potential mix of tenants. A proposal to seek assistance with the massing, scale and layout of the development is currently being reviewed. December 2016 Cycle 1: The Tower Atrium project is currently being reviewed to ensure that the ultimate mix of uses are included. A process is being developed to procure an architect to further identify needs and redesign. A report will be submitted to this committee on September 30, 2015 Cycle 2: RFP to select a principle architect has closed and submissions are being evaluated. Architects have responded to the Request for Pre-Qualification and the submissions are being evaluated. A list of the pre- November 20, 2015 Page 5 of 10!CIC_Progress Scorecard_ _Cycle 2v1.docx

118 Capital Infrastructure Committee Goals and Objectives Progress Scorecard as at December 2, 2015 LEGEND: GREEN = COMMITMENTS COMPLETE YELLOW = COMMITMENTS IN PROGRESS AND ON TRACK RED = COMMITMENTS ARE NOT ON TRACK Item # C26 Source Action Goal Measurement Target Date Progress / Status Committee Goals Provide technology, information resources and support services for our faculty, staff and 21 st century learners that enrich learning, encourage collaboration, facilitate communication, expand access and promote Brock as the preferred place to work and study. Senate Committee direction to the Board June 2016 qualified Architects to receive the Request for Proposal will be provided at the Cycle 2 CIC meeting. Management intends on requesting approval to proceed with issuing the RFP and authority to spend $50,000 on project pre-design (funding identified in the FY 16/17 LTCP). Cycle 1: The IT Strategic Planning process is underway. A draft vision, mission and related principles have been developed (see CIC_IT Strategic Plan Update Report). Key related initiatives include: SharePoint (see CIC_IT Major Projects Update Report) Roadmap for core applications to address urgent and high risk applications current state assessment underway Application architecture plan to be completed by Feb 2016 Roadmap for internet bandwidth to be completed by Dec 2015 Wireless capacity improvements across campus and the residences to be completed via a phased approach by Dec 2016 Formation of a Student IT Advisory Committee to better understand student needs and gain input on projects and initiatives affecting students Committee to be in place by Dec 2015 Annual IT client satisfaction survey next survey planned for Mar 2016 Cycle 2: The IT Strategic Planning process is underway. Follow-up meetings have been scheduled with key University stakeholders to present accomplishments to date and collaborate on a shared IT strategic vision for the medium term. Key related initiatives include: SharePoint (see CIC_IT Major Projects Update Report) Roadmap for core applications to address urgent and high risk applications road map proposal presented to Core Application November 20, 2015 Page 6 of 10!CIC_Progress Scorecard_ _Cycle 2v1.docx

119 Capital Infrastructure Committee Goals and Objectives Progress Scorecard as at December 2, 2015 LEGEND: GREEN = COMMITMENTS COMPLETE YELLOW = COMMITMENTS IN PROGRESS AND ON TRACK RED = COMMITMENTS ARE NOT ON TRACK Item # C27 Source Action Goal Measurement Target Date Progress / Status Committee Goals Provide the Capital Infrastructure Committee with direction on the role of the Hamilton Campus March 2016 Committee (Sep 2015), presentation to SAC scheduled for Nov 2015 for approval Application architecture plan draft data warehouse architecture plan completed; will feed into the application architecture plan to be completed by Feb 2016 Roadmap for internet bandwidth completed; awaiting approval from the budget committee for the operating expenses budget Wireless capacity improvements across campus and the residences no change Formation of a Student IT Advisory Committee - no change Annual IT client satisfaction survey no change Cycle 1: No report. Cycle 2: Report presented to the Committee at this Cycle. November 20, 2015 Page 7 of 10!CIC_Progress Scorecard_ _Cycle 2v1.docx

120 Capital Infrastructure Committee Goals and Objectives Progress Scorecard as at December 2, 2015 LEGEND: GREEN = COMMITMENTS COMPLETE YELLOW = COMMITMENTS IN PROGRESS AND ON TRACK RED = COMMITMENTS ARE NOT ON TRACK Item to be measured Metric History Benchmark Target METRICS CAMPUS SECURITY SERVICES CAMPUS SECURITY SERVICES CAMPUS SECURITY SERVICES 2014 Criminal Offence Rate 2014 decline - 6.5% 2013 increase + 4.4% 2012 decline -20.5% (overall 3 yr average: - 7.5%) 2014 Provincial Offence Rate 2014 decline 18.8% 2013 increase +.8% 2012 decline 22.7% (overall 3 yr average: %) 2014 Service Calls 2014 increase + 5.6% 2013 decline 6.1% (overall 3 yr average: - 1.3%) 2012 decline 3.4% Not available -3% in 2015 Not available -3%in 2015 Not available % with addition of MIWSFPA in 2015 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT Overall indicator of infrastructure condition FACILITIES MANAGEMENT Annual diversion rate of non-hazardous waste FACILITIES MANAGEMENT Ratio (as a %) of Space inventory to Space Generated per COU Standards Facility Condition Index FCI: FCI: 0.16 Annual Waste Diversion Rate : 65.3% : 65.8% May 2014 COU FCAP FCI: 0.11 Province of Ontario: 60% To be determined % I/G : 66.7% COU System: 78.8 To be determined 67.5% November 20, 2015 Page 8 of 10!CIC_Progress Scorecard_ _Cycle 2v1.docx

121 Capital Infrastructure Committee Goals and Objectives Progress Scorecard as at December 2, 2015 LEGEND: GREEN = COMMITMENTS COMPLETE YELLOW = COMMITMENTS IN PROGRESS AND ON TRACK RED = COMMITMENTS ARE NOT ON TRACK Item to be measured Metric History Benchmark Target INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES Business impact of system failure INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES ITS project portfolio (as at Nove-4, 2015) Severity (# users impacted) 1 (>500 users) 2 (50 to 500 users) 3 (<50 users) Mar 2015 Apr 2015 May 2015 Jun 2015 Jul 2015 Aug 2015 Sep Oct Nov (0 users) 1 1 Current projects underway Completed projects: FY2013/14 to current TBD TBD Operations New Work Mandated 2015/ / / Operations New Work Mandated TBD TBD November 20, 2015 Page 9 of 10!CIC_Progress Scorecard_ _Cycle 2v1.docx