Insolvency Practitioners Fees A New System for Approval

Transcription

1 RESTRUCTURING & INSOLVENCY Insolvency Practitioners Fees A New System for Approval Introduction The fees charged by insolvency practitioners can sometimes be a matter of contention, with different interested parties having differing expectations. Further, there is no comprehensive set of guidelines or regulations in Singapore setting out the basis on which insolvency practitioners should determine their fees, as well as the level of information on fees that should be provided to stakeholders. This sometimes leads to unhappiness as to the quantum and necessity of fees after the event. In a recent Singapore High Court decision, Justice Steven Chong has proposed a new system in which insolvency practitioners would submit a schedule of projected fees to the relevant approving body for approval before any substantive work is done. In doing so, Justice Chong considered latest developments in a number of common law jurisdictions and noted broad similarities in their approach towards remuneration. The court has referred the proposed system of fee schedules to the Rules Committee for further study and possible implementation by way of legislative amendments. Pending formal institution of such a system, the court encouraged insolvency practitioners to adopt the practice of submitting costs schedules for approval. This Update looks at the issues in this decision and the key features of the proposed system. Case Note Cost Scheduling The key features of the proposed system are as follows: (i) (ii) Insolvency practitioners should, if their fees are expected to exceed $200,000, submit a costs schedule to the relevant approving body within a month of appointment. The costs schedule is a summary of estimated costs, and should include all information necessary to assess if it is fair, reasonable and proportionate, including: a. Details of the work; b. The anticipated time spent; c. The size of the team and their respective seniorities and responsibilities; d. The proposed basis of remuneration and why it is suitable; e. The hourly rates and a fee estimate for the relevant period; f. The anticipated disbursements and costs; and g. Whether other professionals have also been engaged and the division of responsibility. (iii) (iv) (v) After approval of the costs schedule, the insolvency practitioner is entitled to periodic payments on account. However, there will be a final review at the end of the engagement. If the total sums claimed fall under the fee cap, approval will follow as a matter of course. If there are minor deviations within 15% of the fee cap, there will generally not be a need for an intrusive review. Otherwise, the court will examine whether the insolvency practitioner will have to refund the difference. The insolvency practitioner may apply to amend the costs schedule along the way should it expect major deviations from the initial projections. 1

2 RESTRUCTURING & INSOLVENCY One of the points to note is the periodic nature of the proposed payment system. By allowing the insolvency practitioner to claim periodic payments, he is given a degree of certainty in terms of continued cash flow. The efficiency of the services provided will thus not be hindered by minor disputes over billing in the course of the engagement. The proposed system also provides more certainty in the sense that insolvency practitioners will have less cause for concern that the scope or urgency of work undertaken will be called into question at the end of the engagement. Having approved of the likely scope of work and the insolvency practitioners estimated fees beforehand, the client will also be less inclined to reject the final bill offhand, which could happen if large sums are incurred. Appropriate remuneration for insolvency practitioners The court reiterated that the remuneration for insolvency practitioners must be fair, reasonable and proportionate. The factors for determining the fulfilment of this requirement include the time expended, the complexity of the receivership, the effectiveness of the performance, and the value and nature of the subject matter of the receivership. Insolvency practitioners should also provide full particulars in their bills to justify the quantum charged. This should include the profile and qualifications of the team, the areas of work performed and the time spent, and the general policy regarding the capture of value, such as the steps taken to avoid duplication or over-servicing. Concluding Words Justice Steven Chong has indicated that he will recommend the proposed system to the Chief Justice to refer to the Rules Committee for further study. Therefore, the implementation of the system should it occur will not be within the immediate future, and the eventual system may well differ from the one proposed in this judgment. Nonetheless, insolvency practitioners may take note of the guidance provided as to what constitutes an acceptable fee schedule, including the reasonableness of the billed items, and the information that should be provided in the bills. The team involved in Kao Chai-Chau Linda v Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn [2015] SGHC 260 included Lee Eng Beng S.C., Tan Chuan Thye S.C., Ryan Loh, Jonathan Lee, Wilson Zhu and Fu Qui Jun from Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP. Parties wishing to consult on fees for receivers and managers or other insolvency issues may contact our team below. 2

3 Contacts Lee Eng Beng, SC, PBM Managing D (65) F (65) eng.beng.lee@rajahtann.com Tan Chuan Thye, SC D (65) F (65) chuan.thye.tan@rajahtann.com Ryan Loh D (65) F (65) ryan.loh@rajahtann.com Jonathan Lee D (65) F (65) jonathan.lee@rajahtann.com Wilson Zhu Senior Associate D (65) F (65) wilson.zhu@rajahtann.com Fu Qui Jun Associate D (65) F (65) qui.jun.fu@rajahtann.com Please feel free to also contact Knowledge and Risk Management at eoasis@rajahtann.com ASEAN Economic Community Portal Ahead of the launch of the ASEAN Economic Community ( AEC ) in December this year, businesses looking to tap the opportunities presented by the integrated markets of the AEC can now get help a click away. Rajah & Tann Asia, United Overseas Bank and RSM Chio Lim Stone Forest, have teamed up to launch Business in ASEAN, a portal that provides companies with a single platform that helps businesses navigate the complexities of setting up operations in ASEAN. By tapping into the professional knowledge and resources of the three organisations through this portal, small- and medium-sized enterprises across the 10-member economic grouping can equip themselves with the tools and knowhow to navigate ASEAN s business landscape. Of particular interest to businesses is the "Ask a Question" feature of the portal which enables companies to pose questions to the three organisations which have an extensive network in the region. The portal can be accessed at 3

4 Our regional presence Our regional contacts RAJAH & TANN Singapore RAJAH & TANN REPRESENTATIVE OFFICE China Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP 9 Battery Road #25-01 Straits Trading Building Singapore T F sg.rajahtannasia.com Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP Shanghai Representative Office Unit , Shui On Plaza, 333 Huai Hai Middle Road Shanghai , People's Republic of China T F cn.rajahtannasia.com R&T SOK & HENG Cambodia RAJAH & TANN NK LEGAL Myanmar R&T Sok & Heng Law Office Vattanac Capital Office Tower, Level 17, No. 66 Preah Monivong Boulevard, Sangkat Wat Phnom Khan Daun Penh, Phnom Penh, Cambodia T / 113 F kh.rajahtannasia.com *in association with Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP Rajah & Tann NK Legal Myanmar Company Limited Office Suite 007, Inya Lake Hotel No. 37, Kaba Aye Pagoda Road, Mayangone Township, Yangon, Myanmar T / / F mm.rajahtannasia.com 4

5 ASSEGAF HAMZAH & PARTNERS Indonesia RAJAH & TANN Thailand Assegaf Hamzah & s Menara Rajawali 16th Floor Jalan DR. Ide Anak Agung Gde Agung Lot #5.1 Kawasan Mega Kuningan, Jakarta 12950, Indonesia T F * Assegaf Hamzah & s is an independent law firm in Indonesia and a member of the Rajah & Tann Asia network. Rajah & Tann (Thailand) Limited 973 President Tower, 12th Floor, Units 12A-12F Ploenchit Road, Lumpini, Pathumwan Bangkok 10330, Thailand T F th.rajahtannasia.com RAJAH & TANN Lao PDR RAJAH & TANN LCT LAWYERS Vietnam Rajah & Tann (Laos) Sole Co., Ltd. Phonexay Village, 23 Singha Road, House Number 046/2 Unit 4, Saysettha District, Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR T F la.rajahtannasia.com Rajah & Tann LCT Lawyers Ho Chi Minh City Office Saigon Centre, Level 13, Unit 2&3 65 Le Loi Boulevard, District 1, HCMC, Vietnam T / F CHRISTOPHER & LEE ONG Malaysia Hanoi Office Lotte Center Hanoi - East Tower, Level 30, Unit 3003, Christopher & Lee Ong 54 Lieu Giai St., Ba Dinh Dist., Hanoi, Vietnam Level 22, Axiata Tower, No. 9 Jalan Stesen Sentral 5, Kuala Lumpur Sentral, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia T F T F *in association with Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is one of the largest full service law firms in Singapore, providing high quality advice to an impressive list of clients. We place strong emphasis on promptness, accessibility and reliability in dealing with clients. At the same time, the firm strives towards a practical yet creative approach in dealing with business and commercial problems. As the Singapore member firm of the Lex Mundi Network, we are able to offer access to excellent legal expertise in more than 100 countries. Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is part of Rajah & Tann Asia, a network of local law firms in Singapore, China, Lao PDR, Vietnam, Thailand and Myanmar, as well as associate and affiliate offices in Malaysia, Cambodia, Indonesia and the Middle East. Our Asian network also includes regional desks focused on Japan and South Asia. The contents of this Update are owned by Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP and subject to copyright protection under the laws of Singapore and, through international treaties, other countries. No part of this Update may be reproduced, licensed, sold, published, transmitted, modified, adapted, publicly displayed, broadcast (including storage in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently for any purpose save as permitted herein) without the prior written permission of Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP. Please note also that whilst the information in this Update is correct to the best of our knowledge and belief at the time of writing, it is only intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter and should not be treated as a substitute for specific professional advice for any particular course of action as such information may not suit your specific business and operational requirements. It is to your advantage to seek legal advice for your specific situation. In this regard, you may call the lawyer you normally deal with in Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP or Knowledge & Risk Management at eoasis@rajahtann.com..com. 5