Sharing protocols, experiences and knowledge on management and communication during food crisis

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Sharing protocols, experiences and knowledge on management and communication during food crisis"

Transcription

1 Sharing protocols, experiences and knowledge on management and communication during food crisis Heads of European Food SafetyAgencies (HoA) 2014

2 2 This report was elaborated under the Heads of European Food Safety Agencies (HoA) by a working group of 17 Member States, chaired and coordinated by the Spanish Agen- cy for Consumer Affairs, Food Safety and Nutrition (AECOSAN) SPAIN. BELGIUM, Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain (FASFC); BULGARIA, Bulgarian Food Safety Agency; CROATIA, Veterinary and Food Safety Directorate. Ministry of Agriculture; CYPRUS, State General Laboratory Food Safety Council. Ministry of Health; DENMARK, Danish Veterinary and Food Administration. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries; ESTONIA, Veterinary and Food Board, Ministry of Agriculture; FINLAND, Finnish Food Safety authority (EVIRA); FRANCE, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES); GERMANY, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) and Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety(BVL); GREECE, Controls Directorate. Hellenic Food Authority; IRELAND, Food Safety Authority of Ireland (FSAI); ITALY, Directorate General of Food Hygiene Safety and Nutrition. Ministry of Health; NETHERLANDS, Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority (NVWA); POLAND, Chief Sanitary Inspectorate (GIS). Ministry of Health; Spanish Agency for Consumer Affairs, Food Safety and Nutrition (AECOSAN); SWEDEN, National Food Agency; UNITED KINGDOM, Food Standards Agency (FSA). Publisher Ministry of Health, Social Services and Equality Spanish Agency for Consumer Affairs, Food Safety and Nutrition (AECOSAN) NIPO:

3 3 Contents Summary 5 Introduction 5 Objectives 5 Terms of reference and methodology 6 Terms of reference 6 Working group members 7 Chronology of the work 8 Summarized questionaire information 8 Pre-crisis incident 9 Definition of food crisis 10 Crisis declaration: national/european level and crisis information channels 11 Protocol activation 13 Crisis management 14 Lesson learned 17 Communication 18 Key considerations during management 20 Additional questions 21 Conclusions and recommendations 22 Annexes 26 References 26 Legislation 27

4 4 Abreviations AF: Advisory Forum of EFSA BfR: Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung BVL: Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety EFSA: European Food Safety Authority EWRS: Early warning Response System FAO: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations FBO: Food business operator. FSA: Food Standards Agency FSAI: Food Safety Authority of Ireland FVO: Food Veterinary Office (DG SANCO) HoA: Heads of European Food Safety Agencies IEP: Information exchange Platform INFOSAN: International Food Safety Authority Network MS: Member State of the European Union. RA: Risk assessment RASFF: Rapid alert System for food and feed SOPs: Standard Operation Procedures WHO: World Health Organization WGM: Working Group Member(s)

5 5 Summary Member States have protocols to assist in the response to a food crisis. The general aims are to optimise the management of the crisis, minimise health and economical damage and provide adequate information to consumers. Given the diverse nature of Member State national food safety systems within the EU, the harmonisation of response plans for food crisis including common general guidelines would be highly beneficial. This report is aimed at sharing experiences and perspectives of eighteen organizations from seventeen Member States regarding their management and communication pro- tocols. In doing so, it also provides greater transparency to these protocols encourages harmonisation, uniformity of actions and will assist in improving information to consumers through more effective communications policies. To gather the information from the Member States, the working group devised a tem- platequestionnaire that in a structured way includes the multiple steps of the three as- pects of risk analysis aspects of a food crisis, Risk Assessment, Risk Evaluation and Risk Communication. The analysis of this information collected and the sharing of experiences and perspectives of the different member estates lead the Working to group to draw some conclusions and make recommendations for the management and communication process during a food crisis. Introduction A Food Crisis can have severe impacts on health. It may also cause social alarm and have a negative impact on economic operators. It is therefore vital that, before it occurs, agreed procedures are in place to ensure optimal management, guarantee minimal damage and provide adequate and clear information to consumers. Recent events in the European Union, such as the E. coli outbreak in Germany and France, worldwide dioxins scandal or even the horsemeat case, clearly point to the need for protocols to be in place that can guarantee that food crises are managed following universally recognised criteria. In practice, many of the EU Member States have documented plans for risk assessment, management or communications during food crisis episodes. However these plans or protocols are of different types may be integrated within national contingency plans, consist of national management protocols or SOPs. In some cases they may not exist. Protocols for food crisis situations assist Member States in the implementation of procedures or national intervention plans that are in keeping with the three aspects of risk analysis during a food crisis. Since Member States have rather diverse national food safety systems, some harmonisation with common general guidelines would be highly beneficial. Objectives This working group was arranged for the exchange of experiences, points of view and current protocols and practices in the management of food crisis. The result of this exercise was to provide a view of good practices, useful ideas, sharing of documentation,

6 6 suggestions and recommendations to dealing better with these situations. Sharing experiences and perspectives regarding this type of protocols adds transparency, which among other aspects encourages uniformity in actions. The consumer should benefit from this transparency as it should assist in the development of more efficient and effective communication during times when there is intense focus on official control systems and the actions of competent authorities. Terms of reference and methodology Terms of reference The work was performed by an analysis and gathering of knowledge regarding the assessment, management and communication protocols that Member States use during food crises and the establishment of a framework that allowed sharing perspectives on different aspects of protocols and experiences in the implementation and execution of the above-mentioned protocols. The group considered the relevant existing legislative basis as follows: Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 28 January 2002, laying down the general principles and requirements of food law and establishing the European Food Safety Authority (OJ L 31, ). Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 29 April 2004, on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules (OJ series L 191, ). Commission Decision 2004/478/EC, of 29 April 2004, concerning the adoption of a general plan for food/feed crisis management (OJ L 160, ). Also, in order to conduct the analysis, internationally recognised guidelines and basic principles were used, analysing whether different aspects such as the following are taken into account: uniformity of action streamlining of decision making proportionality and transparency collaboration and coordination of all parties involved responsive and defined flow of information communication standards consideration of legal requirements use of precautionary and uncertainty management principles.

7 7 Working Group Members Participants in the working group of crisis management Chairing and coordination of the work: Spanish Agency for Consumer Affairs, Food Safety and Nutrition (AECOSAN). SPAIN Country Institution Country Institution BELGIUM Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain (FASFC) GREECE Controls Directorate. Hellenic Food Authority BULGARIA Bulgarian Food Safety Agency IRELAND Food Safety Authority of Ireland (FSAI) CROATIA Veterinary and Food Safety Directorate. Ministry of Agriculture ITALY Directorate General of Food Hy- giene Safety and Nutrition Ministry of Health CYPRUS State General Laboratory Food Safety Council. Minis- try of Health NETHER- Food and Consumer Product Safe- LANDS ty Authority (NVWA) DENMARK Danish Veterinary and Food Administration. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries POLAND Chief Sanitary Inspectorate (GIS). Ministry of Health ESTONIA Veterinary and Food Board, Ministry of Agriculture SPAIN Spanish Agency for Consumer Affairs, Food Safety and Nutrition (AECOSAN) FINLAND Finnish Food Safety authority (EVIRA) SWEDEN National Food Agency FRANCE French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occu- pational Health & Safety (ANSES) UNITED KINGDOM Food Standards Agency (FSA) GERMANY (a) Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) (b) Federal Office of Con- sumer Protection and Food Safety(BVL

8 8 Work Chronology Establishment of the working group (WG) (electronically prior to the acceptance of these Reference Terms by the different interested MS).(February 2013). Start-up meeting in Madrid to determine the work to be done and design of the survey methodology, timetable, deliverables, roles and responsibilities, and the format and content of the planned report. (March 12 th, 2013). Distribution of questionnaire and information request to the MS (March 25 th, 2013). Receipt of survey results and information (up to May 24 th, 2013). Elaboration of the draft report and its presentation in the HoA meeting (June 21 st, 2013). Final meeting of the Working group (October 7 th 2013). Proposal for approval in the meeting of HoA (3 rd December 2013). Summarized questionaire information Completed questionnaires were received from 18 organisations representing 17 Member States. The results of the questionnaires were analysed and are summarised as follows: Protocols What are the regulatory documents in your country/authority for assessment, management and communication in case of a food and feed crisis? In general, with the exception of two, all MS participating in the working group have some formal document for the risk assessment, management and communication in food or feed crisis. MS. While they use different types of documents (e.g. cooperation agreement, national crisis plan, protocols, standard operating procedures, contingency plans, legislation); all have a common goal, which is to properly manage these special and complex situations. In addition, the territorial scope of the documents can differ depending on the organizational structure of food safety controls of the MS; therefore the scope can be national, regional or local. Do you have separate organizations for risk assessment and management? Five MS have, within the same institution, two aspects of the risk analysis assessment and management. In ten MS there are different institutions in charge of evaluating and managing risks. (See BfR EU Food Safety Almanac 1 for further information). In many of the cases, where assessment and management belong to the same organization, the possibility of additional support and further consultations on risk assessment by other organizations is mentioned. 1

9 9 What is your opinion on the Commission Decision 2004/478/EC? Ten of the seventeen MS responses agree that the Decision sets out the general principles for managing food and feed crisis and is a very useful tool for MS in helping them to develop their own plans for crisis management. One MS actually uses the Decision as the only protocol during crisis situations without major modifications. Another one contended that there is a need to clarify when the Decision has to be activated during the crisis. It is thought that the Decision addresses the European level without emphasizing or taking into account the complexity of different food safety organizational structures at national level. Six MS point out that the Commission has never declared a crisis or used the rules outlined in the Decision during a crisis situation. Moreover, due to the fact that there is a lack of experience within the EU of using the guidelines of the Decision, some MS stated that it is too generic, such as the definition of crisis, and difficult to know if further modifications or improvements will be necessary. Do you differentiate between crisis management protocols and contingency plans? Which one do you have? According to the responses, most of MS do not differentiate between these two concepts. Ten MS do not establish specific differences between the two types of documents, six WGM make differences and two WGM mention that a contingency plan is included within their protocols. Pre-crisis incident Do you have a classification of pre-crisis incidents? If yes, please describe it further. Three of seventeen MS have a classification of a pre-crisis incident. One of these describes four types in its national manuals: notification, incident, serious incident and crisis. The second classifies incidents in three increasing level of seriousness. The third includes an incident definition agreed with different stakeholders and classifies its incidents as low, medium or high including a definition of these terms. Another MS defines preliminary activities and criteria for the activation of its crisis management plan. These preliminary activities include gathering information for the purpose of determining: natural hazards; time and place of the incident; population that might be exposed; scope and complexity of the risks; potential for greater implications; data on the quantity, distribution and availability of food or feed consumers).

10 10 Definition of food crisis What do you consider key factors for triggering or defining a crisis? There is not a clear definition or concept of the nature or concept of a food crisis. Only one MS defines crisis according to the definition in 2004/478/EC. One MS (FSA) has a very elaborate matrix for the classification of incidents, with an added feature of Triggers in order to identify the potential of the incident to become a crisis. The principal key factors include in the definition of food crisis are listed below. Two MS do not differentiate a crisis from an alert and only mention the presence on the market of food that poses a serious risk to the population as a difference. Figure 1. Food Crisis Triggers Tarjet population Reversibility Credibility Media impact Exceptional Severity Risk Nature Controlability Economic impact Spread Territorial/Food Chain Public concern In general all MS agree that a Food Crisis implies a situation that causes strong public concern, also the territorial and food chain spread of the risk is widely mentioned, followed by economic impact, emerging risk, controllability, nature of the risk, severity. Some other factors are mentioned as: the fact that creates uncertainty, political impact or threat to important goals. Do you include public perception as a Key factor? All MS agree that public perception could trigger a crisis situation and it should therefore be included as a key factor.

11 11 Do you take fraud into consideration as a key factor? Six MS take fraud into consideration as a key factor, with no further considerations. However nine MS state that in order to take it into consideration, a link with food safety should be proven. Two MS consider that this should be a case by case decision. Should fraud issues be included within the RASFF? Most of the MS (14) agree with the inclusion of fraud issues within the RASFF. However: Three MS make some conditions, for example the spread to other Member states, or just, in case of no other suitable alternative. One MS strongly disagrees, while two members of the MS consider inclusion only when food safety could be or is expected to be compromised. The reasons for the inclusion are mainly RASFF s best points as speed, efficiency and efficacy of the system, also the possibility of having a link with food safety and finally also the fact that no other tools are available at the moment. Crisis declaration: national/european level and crisis information channels How do you incorporate risk assessment to crisis consideration? All Member States value the need of risk assessment in order to consider an incident as a crisis; some incorporate it in their protocols, although the way they do it in nine MS is not well defined. Two MS have Risk Assessment independent bodies and rely on them when considering a crisis situation, four MS include their scientific committee within the protocol of crisis management and two MS will contact ad hoc specific experts. Do you consider asking EFSA for help during the initial risk assessment? All MS consider the value of using EFSA s risk assessment tools and networks. Using EFSA directly is not mentioned except by one MS that recognizes that EFSA was used during a recent food crisis (FSAI). EFSA IEP, networks, AF and even EFSA scientific support within the scope of RASFF are mentioned as ways of using EFSA for the initial RA. France and Germany, both with independent Risk Assessment bodies, do not acknowledge EFSA help for this task and they rely on their own initial risk assessment, they will not use EFSA within this scope, due to time constraints.1 MS (Sweden) considers asking EFSA for help during a crisis.

12 12 What information channels (RASFF or others) do you take into consideration? Do you consider media as a channel? There is a large variety of information channels that are taken into consideration; the most mentioned are listed below. RASFF and INFOSAN are the most frequent information channels that MS consider. Figure 2. Information Channels ECDC Official web sites WHO EWRSl Consumers FBOs EFSA Media INFOSAN RASFF A wide array of channels are mentioned at least by one MS: ECDC, FVO, OIE, RAPEX, SCOFCAH, SIENA, Law Enforcement Bodies, and third country competent authorities, There is a broad consensus for considering media as a channel for information: fourteen MS use this source of information that they consider valuable, noting that it is often the fastest and the most important channel. Nine MS mention the need of having this information verified by official sources and three organizations do not mention any need of verification. Three MS do not trust media as a reliable source of information. Do you have a single competent authority for declaring the crisis? With two exceptions, all of the MS represented by the WGM have a single competent body which can declare a food crisis. This body varies according to the MS and its organizational structure. In addition, all countries recognize the need to coordinate their response with other authorities. In cases when the crisis becomes of a very serious nature, some other organizations may take over the declaration. Also in some MS food and feed have different competent organizations and as such the declaration of crisis (see BfR EU Food Safety Almanac) 2. 2

13 13 Protocol activation How do you manage several competent bodies for protocol activation? Although a single competent authority for declaring a crisis is usually established, most of the MS describe several ways of collaboration for protocol activation. This is due to the fact that in the majority of the cases the handling of crisis involves different bodies or territorial authorities (regional) and they could also be or appear to be of different nature or origin. This collaboration relies on: working procedures, crisis management documents, inter-agencies protocols, cooperation agreements, national crisis headquarters or incident response protocols. When written collaboration protocols are not in place, MS will rely on efficient two-way communication, communications networks, agreements, and coordination with federal or regional authorities. At what moment/stage or in what circumstances would you like or have asked to the Commission to intervene? There is a general agreement on this. All MS state that they would like the Commission to intervene as stated in Decision 2004/478/EC- section 3 and points 2.1 or 2.2: Serious risk: the situation involves a serious direct or indirect risk to human health and/ or is perceived or publicized as such or can be perceived and/or publicized as such the risk is spread or could be spread by a large part of the food chain it is highly likely that the risk will spread to several Member States and/or non-community countries. Potential risk: the risk is potential but could evolve into a serious risk which is unlikely to be prevented, eliminated or reduced by existing provisions. The principal reason mentioned to ask Commission intervention is the spread of the incident to other MS and also in cases of unethical conduct between MS. Most of MS would like the Commission to take a role in the harmonization of the responses, information and coordination. Two MS mention that the Commission should also intervene in the management of the crisis however; another MS states the opposite that no direct management should be done by the Commission, as this is the remit of individual MS. Do you think crisis and communication protocols should be further harmonized at European level? All MS with the exception of two believe that further harmonization at European level is advisable. Although there is a general agreement on this point, the different competent authority structures in place across MS in relation to food and feed law may complicate the issue. Two MS suggests that some degree of harmonization could be of value. Some alternatives are provided as: Setting of common minimum elements; Design of guidelines following Decision 2004/478/EC;

14 14 Food crisis exercises; Establishment of common terminology and definitions, such as crisis situations in opposition to an emergency situation or some other incidents; Sharing best practices and definitions would be of interest in particular for the documentation of the management decisions; Sharing of knowledge of lessons learned during past food and feed crisis. All MS should ensure they have established protocols on place. Also MS suggest that a common platform for sharing experiences, discussions, intelligence and information should be facilitated at European level. Crisis management Do you have different protocols according to different type of crisis? Most MS with established protocols (14) acknowledge having one single protocol. Three MS mention having separated protocols for food and feed. Within the same basic protocol, some MS mention different operational approaches according to the crisis; a unique horizontal contingency plan that contemplates different specific case based protocols is mentioned too. One MS describes having different protocol to deal with crisis of animal origin as stakeholders can be different. Also in terms of the severity of the crisis some MS differentiate slightly and have different protocols activated either by emergencies or by crisis. One MS (FSA) has a very clear and protocol based on and differentiated by the severity and complexity of the incident. Another MS (FSAI), has a single protocol, which describes very detailed interagency arrangements for the management of food crisis that ensures involvement and coordination of different agencies. Do you have a single competent body for the management of the crisis? Although the declaration of the crisis is, with one exception, the competence of a single body, four MS declare not having a single competent body for the crisis management itself. Eleven MS declare having a single crisis management body, although some aspects could be managed at local level (2 MS) or by a leading agency (Ireland). In the case of Germany, Italy and Spain, three MS with a decentralized political organization (Landers, Regions or Autonomous Communities), the management of the crisis will take place at those levels. However when the crisis involves more than one region, the central competent authority will coordinate the management.

15 15 How do you manage several competent bodies for crisis management? In general, the responses are similar to those given for question 5.1 (Protocol activation), although for crisis management, this task could be shared with other competent bodies more frequently (at least four MS have more than one). In the case of shared management, several ways are described: emergency and contingency plans, cooperation, coordination and a clear distinction of remits and tasks, establishment of national and regional crisis headquarters. Some pointed out the need to establish more coordination between other organizations in the case of food crisis related to other sources such as bioterrorism, natural disasters, and food fraud (e.g. horsemeat incident). How do you manage coordination between activated interfaces (EWRS, RASFF, Consumer bodies etc.) Most of the WGM do not acknowledge the need of any additional coordination between RASFF and INFOSAN, in many cases because the national contact points for these systems are located in the same organization. In addition to these comments, 40 % of the MS mention other ways of collaboration and coordination based on agreements, written protocols, crisis management team, regulations and coordination meetings as needed, and also RASFF as a coordination tool with the regions. However none of these coordination tools are specifically designed for communication. Most of MS express the need of further coordination between the health (EWRS) and food safety authorities. Do you think it is necessary to create a crisis management committee/unit? If yes, describe composition It is generally agreed that a crisis management committee or unit is necessary and this is resolved in different ways by the MS. In seven MS (this committee is created ad hoc either in their protocol, by signing an agreement or because it is included in the SOP s. In the case of four MS, the need to create the committee is not mentioned as it is already integrated in the structure of the organization. One MS describes that the role of the management committee is assumed by the risk assessment and management organization and three MS do not define the way to create this committee. Do you consider constituting supporting units to the crisis committee? All MS, with the exception of one, utilise some supporting units/task forces to the crisis committee. These units or experts (as for instance scientific committees) could already be present in the organizations, in which case no need for making special arrangements

16 16 is recognized, or they can be expressly created in a crisis situation in accordance to the crisis protocols and plans at hand. The type of supporting units may differ (e.g. public health experts, risk assessors, legal expertise, chemists, administrative, communications or analytical support), but the most common is scientific support. Do you consider a risk assessment/scientific support unit? See the reply above, all MS at some degree consider the need of scientific support, either external or internal, fit for purpose or already existent within the MS. Do you consider laboratory support? All MS, with the exception of two, consider laboratory support to assist the crisis committee. This laboratory support could be facilitated by the network of official control laboratories or National/European reference laboratories. In two MS, National Reference Laboratories take an active part in the multi-annual control programs and also in the monitoring/surveillance programs on risk basis and/or precautionary principles. The scientific support to a crisis management committee can have an added value for a holistic approach (e.g. analytical method used, range of uncertainty and specificity of method, the analysis of more samples from other sources, supportive traceability methods). One MS has the National Reference laboratory activities at the same organization and Laboratory department gives support during crises. Do you have a protocol for coordination with EURL, NRL, official control laboratories? Eight MS have protocols for coordination between different laboratories (EUR, NRL, official control labs,). One MS has a protocol of cooperation between the laboratory and the competent authorities; in this protocol the specific objectives of testing are described. Eight MS lack this kind of protocol, one of which refers to the need for maintaining close cooperation as defined in the relevant EU legislation. One MS considers that there is a general routine for this matter in its crisis plan. How do you assess the efficacy of the management measures taken (health area, other competent authorities.)? Can you describe the indicators used to monitoring the crisis? There is no general agreement on this issue; two MS mention having monitoring and assessment included in their crisis protocols without giving further details. Two MS mention the need of using third parties or enforcement bodies. In terms of indicators used to assess the efficacy of the crisis management, five MS have not defined these parameters, one MS has no criteria and the rest of the MS define different parameters depending on the nature of the incident and its trigger. The principal

17 17 parameters taken into account are the following: number of cases of human illness (the majority of the MS), detection of the cause, identification of the food hazard on the market and performed controls. The fact of having EU harmonised criteria for assessing efficacy is also mentioned Two MS remark on the relevance of the interaction with the media, the industry and the consumers. They mention the following indicators: adequate responses to media and consumers queries, communications to consumers and politicians. In addition, reputation and credibility are seen as good management indicators. One MS mentions that it carefully follows the epidemiological investigations, together with the public health authorities. Do you have an established mechanism for closing the crisis? On what basis? Do you specifically communicate the closing of the crisis to the media? Almost all MS (sixteen) have mechanism in place (or are in the process of including it) in their national protocols for closing the crisis. Of these, eleven MS communicate the closing of the crisis to the media and four MS will communicate this aspect depending on the type of the incident. One MS mentions not to have a specific procedure for closing the crisis. Lesson learned Once the crisis is closed, do you review the management? If yes, is it an internal, external or independent review? Almost all MS (fifteen acknowledge the importance of assessing the management of the crisis and in some cases this review is included in their protocols. Two MS mention that a review is not always carried out post the event. Two MS do not have this kind of practices, and one of them suggests it would useful to have a harmonized standard to perform the review. Ten MS consider the use of an internal review; an eventual external evaluation is taken into consideration case by case. Do you include observers through management of the crisis? The majority of MS do not include observers. Only one mentions the possibility of using them in the case of high level incidents Do you consider making follow up recommendations after the crisis? All WGM consider that it is necessary to make follow up recommendations.

18 18 Do you consider writing and communicating the report of the internal review and follow up recommendations? Twelve MS agree with the need of a written report and also with its communication. The rest are not in favour of it, or have the decision depend on the risk or on the existence of a request. Do you assess the impact of your communication policy? Eleven MS do not consider doing any assessment of the impact of the communication policy. The MS find it important to specify that such an assessment can be performed through social media and consumer research. Communication Do you have a specific protocol for crisis communication? Ten MS have some kind of protocol, guidelines or documents related to crisis communication. They can be included in their crisis protocols or contingency plans. The rest of the MS rely on EFSA guidelines, get the assistance of external communication experts, describe the basic elements of crisis communication in their management plan or do not consider that this is needed. What is the communication channel you consider more valuable (TV, press, web page, social media...)? The most favoured communication channel is internet pages followed by social media, TV, print press. Radio is the least favoured. Table 1. Communication Channels The best Very good Good Acceptable Not efficient? TV Press Radio Web page Social Networks

19 19 Figure 3. Classification of the value of the communication channels TV Press Radio web page Social networks The best Very good Good Aceptable Not eficay Do you use social media (Facebook or Twitter)? If so, describe further your experience. Eleven MS declare not using these media. The rest acknowledges using social media to some extent, mainly for following up public opinion on how the crisis is managed. The MS that use social media assign their effectiveness to their real time capacity of evaluation and their close connection to the consumer. Do you use one or several designed spokesperson for crisis communication? If several, describe them. Do you use communication professionals? All MS recognize the importance of having designated spokespersons during the crisis, but only eight MS use a single spokesperson. MS use different designated spokesperson: Directors of Agencies, Ministers, Experts, technical staff or heads of Communication Units. Only 33% of them are communication professionals. Have you used or intend to use EFSA communication guidelines? Although all MS acknowledge the usefulness of EFSA communication guidelines for general communications skills, the majority do not consider them suitable for communications during crisis situations. However, eight MS incorporate at least some of the principles of EFSA communication guidelines within their communication guidelines/protocols for crisis situations.

20 20 When do you think the consumers should be informed during the crisis? All MS agree that within a crisis situation the communication to consumers should be done as soon as possible and where necessary at all stages of the crisis. According to some MS, this communication should be transparent through the whole process and proactive before serious incidents become crisis. Key considerations during management How do you handle uncertainties during crisis situations? No specific management tools are provided, with the exception of the precautionary principle pointed up by four MS. France and Germany, through their Risk Assessment Bodies, indicate that uncertainties in crisis situations should be taken into consideration in the same way as in peacetime and Germany consequently refers to risk assessment guidelines. One MS considers that it is important to inform about crisis and make an evaluation through the journalist, to show them the uncertainties and try to be open and respectful about them. Could you provide us with your experience or thoughts on the use of the precautionary principle? In general the precautionary principle is seen by MS as a necessary aspect during crisis situations. In most cases no recent experiences were pointed out and five MS declared that they have never use it or did not specify. Three MS specifically mention that recall or other measures should only be done when there is a risk. Two MS indicate that the precautionary principle was recently used and temporary recommendations were made based on the initial results. In the 2011 EHEC crisis, taking into account the precautionary principle, the German authorities issued a temporary recommendation based on the first results of a study and subsequently specified certain vegetables (cucumbers and other) as possible risky. The recommendation was drawn back when it became clear that fenugreek seeds caused the disease and fatalities. Italy mentions that immediately after the Fukushima nuclear incident and before the EU specific programme was arranged, it was decided to test 100% of food and feed consignments coming from Japan for radioactivity. What do you think is the role of EFSA in a crisis situation? All MS recognize the value of EFSA during crisis. However, some point out that EFSA s role should only be supporting MS with the risk assessment and not getting involved in the risk management. MS add some possible other roles for EFSA in crisis as: harmonization of risk evaluation in crisis in order to facilitate management responses from the Commission; rapid risk assessment, provide specific experts if MS require it, direct support to a single

Guidelines for Management and Communication during Food and Feed Safety Incidents

Guidelines for Management and Communication during Food and Feed Safety Incidents Guidelines for Management and Communication during Food and Feed Safety Incidents Heads of European Food SafetyAgencies (HoA) 2015 2 This report was elaborated under the Heads of European Food Safety Agencies

More information

Risk Management and Crisis Coordination

Risk Management and Crisis Coordination Risk Management and Crisis Coordination Dr. Tschiersky-Schöneburg Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit Dr. Helmut Tschiersky-Schöneburg 8. Oktober 2012 Seite 1 Overview I - Legal

More information

SURVEY ON THE TRAINING OF GENERAL CARE NURSES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION. The current minimum training requirements for general care nurses

SURVEY ON THE TRAINING OF GENERAL CARE NURSES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION. The current minimum training requirements for general care nurses SURVEY ON THE TRAINING OF GENERAL CARE NURSES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION This survey serves as a background document for the discussion of the Commission's legislative proposal to modernize the minimum requirements

More information

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 25.9.2014 COM(2014) 592 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL on the implementation in the period from 4 December 2011 until 31 December

More information

Introduction. Fields marked with * are mandatory.

Introduction. Fields marked with * are mandatory. Questionnaires on introducing the European Professional Card for nurses, doctors, pharmacists, physiotherapists, engineers, mountain guides and estate agents(to competent authorities and other interested

More information

The Commission Health Emergency Operations Facility:

The Commission Health Emergency Operations Facility: EUROPEAN COMMISSION The Commission Health Emergency Operations Facility: for a coordinated management of public health emergency at EU level Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on its

More information

How do we communicate about risks? Laura Smillie Senior Communications Adviser

How do we communicate about risks? Laura Smillie Senior Communications Adviser How do we communicate about risks? Laura Smillie Senior Communications Adviser Communication and Risk Perception in the Field of Food Safety Prague, 29 May 2013 Communications Purpose Provide appropriate,

More information

Indicator fact sheet Fishing fleet trends

Indicator fact sheet Fishing fleet trends Indicator fact sheet Fishing fleet trends Key message: The big EU 15 fishing fleet (1989 2000) has decreased in numbers of vessels (10 %), in tonnage (6 %) and power (12 %) The much smaller EFTA fishing

More information

DRAFT AMENDING BUDGET N 6 TO THE GENERAL BUDGET 2014 GENERAL STATEMENT OF REVENUE

DRAFT AMENDING BUDGET N 6 TO THE GENERAL BUDGET 2014 GENERAL STATEMENT OF REVENUE EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 17.10.2014 COM(2014) 649 final DRAFT AMENDING BUDGET N 6 TO THE GENERAL BUDGET 2014 GENERAL STATEMENT OF REVENUE STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURE BY SECTION Section III Commission

More information

Katy Taylor, European Coalition to End Animal Experiments (ECEAE), London, UK

Katy Taylor, European Coalition to End Animal Experiments (ECEAE), London, UK COMMENT EU member state contribution to alternative methods 1 Katy Taylor, European Coalition to End Animal Experiments (ECEAE), London, UK Summary Article 47 of the new EU Directive 2010/63/EU on the

More information

1. Consultation of the Committee (SCFCAH)

1. Consultation of the Committee (SCFCAH) GUIDELINES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNITY GUIDES TO GOOD PRACTICE FOR HYGIENE OR FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE HACCP PRINCIPLES, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 9 OF REGULATION (EC) NO 852/2004 ON THE HYGIENE

More information

Draft guidelines and measures to improve ICT procurement. Survey results

Draft guidelines and measures to improve ICT procurement. Survey results Draft guidelines and measures to improve ICT procurement Survey results Europe Economics Chancery House 53-64 Chancery Lane London WC2A 1QU Tel: (+44) (0) 20 7831 4717 Fax: (+44) (0) 20 7831 4515 www.europe-economics.com

More information

INNOBAROMETER 2015 - THE INNOVATION TRENDS AT EU ENTERPRISES

INNOBAROMETER 2015 - THE INNOVATION TRENDS AT EU ENTERPRISES Eurobarometer INNOBAROMETER 2015 - THE INNOVATION TRENDS AT EU ENTERPRISES REPORT Fieldwork: February 2015 Publication: September 2015 This survey has been requested by the European Commission, Directorate-General

More information

1. Perception of the Bancruptcy System... 2. 2. Perception of In-court Reorganisation... 4

1. Perception of the Bancruptcy System... 2. 2. Perception of In-court Reorganisation... 4 Bankruptcy Systems and In-court Reorganisation of Firms, 2010 Content: 1. Perception of the Bancruptcy System... 2 2. Perception of In-court Reorganisation... 4 3. Perception of Creditor Committees, Fast

More information

THE ORGANISATION AND FINANCING OF HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IN LATVIA

THE ORGANISATION AND FINANCING OF HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IN LATVIA THE ORGANISATION AND FINANCING OF HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IN LATVIA Eriks Mikitis Ministry of Health of the Republic of Latvia Department of Health Care Director General facts, financial resources Ministry

More information

CABINET OFFICE THE CIVIL SERVICE NATIONALITY RULES

CABINET OFFICE THE CIVIL SERVICE NATIONALITY RULES ANNEX A CABINET OFFICE THE CIVIL SERVICE NATIONALITY RULES Introduction The Civil Service Nationality Rules concern eligibility for employment in the Civil Service on the grounds of nationality and must

More information

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 17.9.2014 C(2014) 6767 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION Updating of data used to calculate lump sum and penalty payments to be proposed by the Commission to the Court

More information

Preliminary Annual Report

Preliminary Annual Report EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate G Veterinary and International affairs G4 Food, Alert system and training Preliminary Annual Report 2011 Page 1 of 14 1. The Rapid

More information

Problem analysis: why the EU Battlegroups have not been used so far. Four factors hampering the deployability of the Battlegroups can be identified:

Problem analysis: why the EU Battlegroups have not been used so far. Four factors hampering the deployability of the Battlegroups can be identified: DISCUSSION PAPER (16 JULY 2014) EU BATTLEGROUPS: USE THEM OR LOSE THEM SUBMITTED BY THE DELEGATION OF THE NETHERLANDS TO THE ITALIAN PRESIDENCY PARLIAMENT OF THE IPC CFSP/CSDP Introduction At the European

More information

EUROPEAN AREA OF SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

EUROPEAN AREA OF SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS EUROPEAN AREA OF SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS REPORT Fieldwork: April - May 2014 Publication: June 2014 This survey has been requested by the European Commission, Directorate-General for Education and Culture

More information

IMPEL. European Union network for the Implementation and Enforcement of Environmental Law

IMPEL. European Union network for the Implementation and Enforcement of Environmental Law IMPEL European Union network for the Implementation and Enforcement of Environmental Law The mission of IMPEL is to contribute to protecting the environment by promoting the effective implementation and

More information

HOW COMPANIES INFLUENCE OUR SOCIETY: CITIZENS VIEW

HOW COMPANIES INFLUENCE OUR SOCIETY: CITIZENS VIEW Flash Eurobarometer HOW COMPANIES INFLUENCE OUR SOCIETY: CITIZENS VIEW REPORT Fieldwork: October-November 2012 Publication: April 2013 This survey has been requested by the European Commission, Directorate-General

More information

The Community Innovation Survey 2010 (CIS 2010)

The Community Innovation Survey 2010 (CIS 2010) The Community Innovation Survey 2010 (CIS 2010) THE HARMONISED SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE The Community Innovation Survey 2010 FINAL VERSION July 9, 2010 This survey collects information on your enterprise s

More information

Managing Food Incidents Incident Management in the Food Standards Agency. Colin Houston Head of Incidents Unit

Managing Food Incidents Incident Management in the Food Standards Agency. Colin Houston Head of Incidents Unit EMERGENZE IN SICUREZZA ALIMENTARE: PROCEDURE E GESTIONE FOOD SAFETY EMERGENCY: PROCEDURES AND MANAGEMENT Cremona, 6-8 Giugno 2011 Managing Food Incidents Incident Management in the Food Standards Agency

More information

SCIENTIFIC REPORT OF EFSA

SCIENTIFIC REPORT OF EFSA EFSA Journal 2012;10(10):2913 SCIENTIFIC REPORT OF EFSA Scientific and technical assistance on the minimum sample size to test should an annual BSE statistical testing regime be authorised in healthy slaughtered

More information

Incident Management in the Food Standards Agency. The Role of External Communications. Colin Houston Head of Incidents Unit

Incident Management in the Food Standards Agency. The Role of External Communications. Colin Houston Head of Incidents Unit Incident Management in the Food Standards Agency The Role of External Communications Colin Houston Head of Incidents Unit How to report an incident Businesses and local and port health authorities can

More information

Effects of using International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in the EU: public consultation

Effects of using International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in the EU: public consultation Case Id: 2bade071-a2c3-45f4-85b5-b05301baabec Effects of using International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in the EU: public consultation Fields marked with are mandatory. Impact of International

More information

Response to the European Commission s consultation on the legal framework for the fundamental right to protection of personal data

Response to the European Commission s consultation on the legal framework for the fundamental right to protection of personal data Stockholm: Göteborg: Malmö: 105 24 Stockholm Box 57 Box 4221 Fax 08 640 94 02 401 20 Göteborg 203 13 Malmö Plusgiro: 12 41-9 Org. Nr: 556134-1248 www.intrum.se Bankgiro: 730-4124 info@se.intrum.com Response

More information

The Debt Management Office

The Debt Management Office The Debt Management Office Based on a client presentation October 2010 1 Outline The Debt Management Office Different institutional arrangements Internal organisation and operation Building a DMO What

More information

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY Ref. Ares(2015)2384183-08/06/2015 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY Directorate F - Food and Veterinary Office DG(SANTE) 2015-7752 - MR FINAL OVERVIEW REPORT REPORT ON

More information

Special Eurobarometer 397 CORRUPTION REPORT

Special Eurobarometer 397 CORRUPTION REPORT Special Eurobarometer 397 CORRUPTION REPORT Fieldwork: February - March 213 Publication: February 214 This survey has been requested by the European Commission, Directorate-General for Home Affairs and

More information

FAO/WHO Regional Conference on Food Safety for the Americas and the Caribbean San José, Costa Rica, 6-9 December 2005

FAO/WHO Regional Conference on Food Safety for the Americas and the Caribbean San José, Costa Rica, 6-9 December 2005 Agenda Item 5 Conference Room Document 13 FAO/WHO Regional Conference on Food Safety for the Americas and the Caribbean San José, Costa Rica, 6-9 December 2005 THE FOOD SAFETY REGULATORY SYSTEM IN CANADA

More information

Open public consultation as part of the Fitness Check for the Construction Sector - Questionnaire for public authorities

Open public consultation as part of the Fitness Check for the Construction Sector - Questionnaire for public authorities Open public consultation as part of the Fitness Check for the Construction Sector - Questionnaire for public authorities Fields marked with are mandatory. Open public consultation as part of the Fitness

More information

Public consultation on the contractual public-private partnership on cybersecurity and possible accompanying measures

Public consultation on the contractual public-private partnership on cybersecurity and possible accompanying measures Public consultation on the contractual public-private partnership on cybersecurity and possible accompanying measures Fields marked with are mandatory. Public consultation on the contractual public-private

More information

GUIDELINES FOR FOOD IMPORT CONTROL SYSTEMS

GUIDELINES FOR FOOD IMPORT CONTROL SYSTEMS GUIDELINES FOR FOOD IMPORT CONTROL SYSTEMS SECTION 1 SCOPE CAC/GL 47-2003 1. This document provides a framework for the development and operation of an import control system to protect consumers and facilitate

More information

Supporting CSIRTs in the EU Marco Thorbruegge Head of Unit Operational Security European Union Agency for Network and Information Security

Supporting CSIRTs in the EU Marco Thorbruegge Head of Unit Operational Security European Union Agency for Network and Information Security Supporting CSIRTs in the EU Marco Thorbruegge Head of Unit Operational Security European Union Agency for Network and Information Security www.enisa.europa.eu European Union Agency for Network and Information

More information

INVESTING IN INTANGIBLES: ECONOMIC ASSETS AND INNOVATION DRIVERS FOR GROWTH

INVESTING IN INTANGIBLES: ECONOMIC ASSETS AND INNOVATION DRIVERS FOR GROWTH Flash Eurobarometer INVESTING IN INTANGIBLES: ECONOMIC ASSETS AND INNOVATION DRIVERS FOR GROWTH REPORT Fieldwork: January February 213 Publication: May 213 This survey has been requested by the European

More information

Analysis of the EU fruit and vegetables sector

Analysis of the EU fruit and vegetables sector 26 September 2014 Analysis of the EU fruit and vegetables sector EU and to Russia (2011-2013) Recent market s and measures taken to address market disruptions following the Russian import ban EU and to

More information

Instruments to control and finance the building of healthcare infrastructure in other countries of the European Union

Instruments to control and finance the building of healthcare infrastructure in other countries of the European Union Summary and conclusions This report describes the instruments by which the respective authorities of eight important European Union members control the building, financing and geographical distribution

More information

PRIORITY RULES ON COMPENSATION FOR NUCLEAR DAMAGE IN NATIONAL LEGISLATION

PRIORITY RULES ON COMPENSATION FOR NUCLEAR DAMAGE IN NATIONAL LEGISLATION PRIORITY RULES ON COMPENSATION FOR NUCLEAR DAMAGE IN NATIONAL LEGISLATION (As of December 2009) The OECD Nuclear Energy Agency attempts to maintain the information contained in the attached table in as

More information

EUF STATISTICS. 31 December 2013

EUF STATISTICS. 31 December 2013 . ESTIMATES OF EU TURNOVER VOLUMES. Turnover volumes by product, allocation and notification (Estimates of EU s, Millions of ) Estimate of the EU % on Turnover Significance of the sample on total turnover

More information

RKI workshop, Evidence based immunisation. Evidence-based methods for public health

RKI workshop, Evidence based immunisation. Evidence-based methods for public health RKI workshop, Evidence based immunisation Evidence-based methods for public health ECDC report Evidence-based methods for public health How to assess the best available evidence when time is limited and

More information

The coordination of healthcare in Europe

The coordination of healthcare in Europe The coordination of healthcare in Europe Rights of insured persons and their family members under Regulations (EC) No 883/2004 and (EC) No 987/2009 Social Europe European Commission The coordination of

More information

Panel: How broadband policy can contribute to deploy secured and universal broadband access. Presentation:

Panel: How broadband policy can contribute to deploy secured and universal broadband access. Presentation: Panel: How broadband policy can contribute to deploy secured and universal broadband access Presentation: Initiatives to deploy broadband access in Europe Erik BOHLIN Chalmers University of Technology,

More information

2 ND CALL FOR PROPOSALS 27 October 2008 30 January 2009

2 ND CALL FOR PROPOSALS 27 October 2008 30 January 2009 2 ND CALL FOR PROPOSALS 27 October 2008 30 January 2009 1. INTRODUCTION Authorities and stakeholders at local and regional level have a vital role to play in the achievement of the EU s strategies for

More information

List of Contents Section 10, Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection Legislation Page

List of Contents Section 10, Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection Legislation Page List of Contents Section 10, Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection Legislation Page Overview 1 The Radiation Protection (Medical Exposures) Directive 11 The Public Information (Radiological Emergency)

More information

Measles and rubella monitoring

Measles and rubella monitoring SURVEILLANCE REPORT Measles and rubella monitoring February 213 Measles and rubella are targeted for elimination in Europe by 215. ECDC closely monitors progress towards interruption of endemic transmission

More information

17-11-05 ANNEX IV. Scientific programmes and initiatives

17-11-05 ANNEX IV. Scientific programmes and initiatives 17-11-05 ANNEX IV Scientific programmes and initiatives DG TAXUD Pre-feasibility study for an observation system of the External Border of the European Union In this study, the external border will be

More information

New environmental liabilities for EU companies

New environmental liabilities for EU companies New environmental liabilities for EU companies The ELD applies to all businesses that operate within the EU, even if the parent company is located outside of the EU. The ELD applies to all businesses,

More information

The European regulatory system for medicines and the European Medicines Agency

The European regulatory system for medicines and the European Medicines Agency The European regulatory system for medicines and the European Medicines Agency A consistent approach to medicines regulation across the European Union An agency of the European Union This booklet is intended

More information

Council of the European Union Brussels, 29 January 2016 (OR. en)

Council of the European Union Brussels, 29 January 2016 (OR. en) Conseil UE Council of the European Union Brussels, 29 January 2016 (OR. en) PUBLIC 5708/16 LIMITE AGRI 31 VETER 7 NOTE From: To: Subject: General Secretariat of the Council Permanent Representatives Committee/Council

More information

European judicial training 2014. Justice

European judicial training 2014. Justice European judicial training 2014 Justice Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Measuring money laundering at continental level: The first steps towards a European ambition. January 2011 EUROPEAN COMMISSION

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Measuring money laundering at continental level: The first steps towards a European ambition. January 2011 EUROPEAN COMMISSION MONEY LAUNDERING IN EUROPE Measuring money laundering at continental level: The first steps towards a European ambition EXECUTIVE SUMMARY January 2011 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG HOME AFFAIRS FIGHT AGAINST

More information

AGENDA. Food Contact Materials: Working Together for Safety and Innovation in Europe

AGENDA. Food Contact Materials: Working Together for Safety and Innovation in Europe AGENDA Food Contact Materials: Working Together for Safety and Innovation in Europe Page 2 Conference Food contact materials: working together for safety and innovation in Europe 30 th September 2015 Luxembourg,

More information

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE EDQM ACTIVITIES

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE EDQM ACTIVITIES QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE EDQM ACTIVITIES Why are Pharmacopoeias so important in a globalised world? Pharmacopoeias have historically provided collections of medical recipes intended to ensure accurate

More information

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 2 May 2011 9564/11. Interinstitutional File: 2010/0210 (COD)

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 2 May 2011 9564/11. Interinstitutional File: 2010/0210 (COD) COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 2 May 2011 Interinstitutional File: 2010/0210 (COD) 9564/11 SOC 372 MIGR 99 CODEC 714 DRS 64 WTO 187 SERVICES 66 NOTE from: Council General Secretariat to: Delegations

More information

CASH BENEFITS IN RESPECT OF SICKNESS AND MATERNITY SUBJECT TO EU COORDINATION

CASH BENEFITS IN RESPECT OF SICKNESS AND MATERNITY SUBJECT TO EU COORDINATION CASH BENEFITS IN RESPECT OF SICKNESS AND MATERNITY SUBJECT TO EU COORDINATION Z a k ł a d U b e z p i e c z e ń S p o ł e c z n y c h The scope and purpose of benefits coordination The EU coordination

More information

Adult Education Survey 2006, European comparison

Adult Education Survey 2006, European comparison Education 2009 Adult Education Survey 2006, European comparison Adults in the Nordic countries actively participate in education and training Persons aged 25 to 64 who live in the Nordic countries (Finland,

More information

The FAO-OIE-WHO. Collaboration. A Tripartite Concept Note

The FAO-OIE-WHO. Collaboration. A Tripartite Concept Note The FAO-OIE-WHO Collaboration Sharing responsibilities and coordinating global activities to address health risks at the animal-human-ecosystems interfaces A Tripartite Concept Note April 2010 Vision A

More information

72/2015-21 April 2015

72/2015-21 April 2015 72/2015-21 April 2015 Provision of deficit and debt data for 2014 - first notification Euro area and EU28 government deficit at 2.4% and 2.9% of GDP respectively Government debt at 91.9% and 86.8% In 2014,

More information

784 der Beilagen XXV. GP - Beschluss NR - 06 Schlussakte in englischer Sprache (Normativer Teil) 1 von 32 FINAL ACT. www.parlament.gv.

784 der Beilagen XXV. GP - Beschluss NR - 06 Schlussakte in englischer Sprache (Normativer Teil) 1 von 32 FINAL ACT. www.parlament.gv. 784 der Beilagen XXV. GP - Beschluss NR - 06 Schlussakte in englischer Sprache (Normativer Teil) 1 von 32 FINAL ACT 1 2 von 32 784 der Beilagen XXV. GP - Beschluss NR - 06 Schlussakte in englischer Sprache

More information

Keeping European Consumers safe Rapid Alert System for dangerous non-food products 2014

Keeping European Consumers safe Rapid Alert System for dangerous non-food products 2014 Keeping European Consumers safe Rapid Alert System for dangerous non-food products 2014 COMPLETE STATISTICS Justice and Consumers Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers Directorate Consumers Unit

More information

A European perspective on creating standards and assuring compliance

A European perspective on creating standards and assuring compliance A European perspective on creating standards and assuring compliance Laurence Bonafos European Commission Directorate-General for Health and Consumers Animal Welfare Unit http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/index_en.htm

More information

The Future European Constitution

The Future European Constitution Flash Eurobarometer European Commission The Future European Constitution Fieldwork : January 2004 Publication : February 2004 Flash Eurobarometer 159 - TNS Sofres / EOS Gallup Europe This survey was requested

More information

Medical Device Training Program 2015

Medical Device Training Program 2015 Medical Device Training Introduction Supplementary training and education is often overlooked by medical device professionals until it is triggered by an upcoming FDA or Notified Body and/or ISO 13485

More information

The European Commission s strategy on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) 2011-2014: achievements, shortcomings and future challenges

The European Commission s strategy on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) 2011-2014: achievements, shortcomings and future challenges The European Commission s strategy on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) 2011-2014: achievements, shortcomings and future challenges Fields marked with are mandatory. 1 Introduction - Background and

More information

RETAIL FINANCIAL SERVICES

RETAIL FINANCIAL SERVICES Special Eurobarometer 373 RETAIL FINANCIAL SERVICES REPORT Fieldwork: September 211 Publication: April 212 This survey has been requested by the European Commission, Directorate-General Internal Market

More information

RETAIL FINANCIAL SERVICES

RETAIL FINANCIAL SERVICES Special Eurobarometer 373 RETAIL FINANCIAL SERVICES REPORT Fieldwork: September 211 Publication: March 212 This survey has been requested by Directorate-General Internal Market and Services and co-ordinated

More information

Veterinary applications of ionising radiation

Veterinary applications of ionising radiation Veterinary applications of ionising radiation HERCA Task Force on Veterinary Applications Main results of the Questionnaire National regulatory requirements with regard to veterinary medical applications

More information

Study on the impact of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 on the protection of animals during transport. Specific Contract N SANCO/2010/D5/S12.

Study on the impact of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 on the protection of animals during transport. Specific Contract N SANCO/2010/D5/S12. FRAMEWORK CONTRACT: EVALUATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND RELATED SERVICES; LOT 3: FOOD CHAIN Study on the impact of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 on the protection of animals during transport Specific Contract

More information

INTERNATIONAL REGULATION ON FOOD SAFETY

INTERNATIONAL REGULATION ON FOOD SAFETY INTERNATIONAL REGULATION ON FOOD SAFETY Functional Food 1 December 2008 Dr.Maken FAO Consultant 1 OBJECTIVE BY THE END OF SESSION, FAMILIARIZE THE PARTICIPANTS WITH: International organizations involved

More information

REGULATION REGULATION ON THE WORKING PROCEDURES AND PRINCIPLES OF RISK ASSESSMENT COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS SECTION ONE

REGULATION REGULATION ON THE WORKING PROCEDURES AND PRINCIPLES OF RISK ASSESSMENT COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS SECTION ONE 24 December 2011 SATURDAY Official Gazette No.: 28152 REGULATION From the Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock: REGULATION ON THE WORKING PROCEDURES AND PRINCIPLES OF RISK ASSESSMENT COMMITTEES

More information

The RFID Revolution: Your voice on the Challenges, Opportunities and Threats. Online Public Consultation Preliminary Overview of the Results

The RFID Revolution: Your voice on the Challenges, Opportunities and Threats. Online Public Consultation Preliminary Overview of the Results The RFID Revolution: Your voice on the Challenges, Opportunities and Threats Online Public Consultation Preliminary Overview of the Results 16 October 2006 Disclaimer: This document is a working document

More information

PRINCIPLES FOR EVALUATION OF DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE

PRINCIPLES FOR EVALUATION OF DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE PRINCIPLES FOR EVALUATION OF DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE PARIS, 1991 DAC Principles for Evaluation of Development Assistance Development Assistance Committee Abstract: The following

More information

COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS AND TECHNICAL REGULATIONS (98/34 COMMITTEE)

COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS AND TECHNICAL REGULATIONS (98/34 COMMITTEE) EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Regulatory Policy Standardisation Brussels, 9 th November 2005 Doc.: 34/2005 Rev. 1 EN COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS AND TECHNICAL REGULATIONS (98/34

More information

Definition of Public Interest Entities (PIEs) in Europe

Definition of Public Interest Entities (PIEs) in Europe Definition of Public Interest Entities (PIEs) in Europe FEE Survey October 2014 This document has been prepared by FEE to the best of its knowledge and ability to ensure that it is accurate and complete.

More information

EMERGENCY PLAN FOR SECURITY OF SUPPLY OF NATURAL GAS THE NETHERLANDS

EMERGENCY PLAN FOR SECURITY OF SUPPLY OF NATURAL GAS THE NETHERLANDS EMERGENCY PLAN FOR SECURITY OF SUPPLY OF NATURAL GAS THE NETHERLANDS Based on Regulation (EU) No 994/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 concerning measures to safeguard

More information

168/2014-4 November 2014. At risk of poverty or social exclusion 2 rate in the EU28, 2008-2013 (% of total population)

168/2014-4 November 2014. At risk of poverty or social exclusion 2 rate in the EU28, 2008-2013 (% of total population) 168/2014-4 November 2014 At risk of poverty or social exclusion in the EU28 More than 120 million persons at risk of poverty or social exclusion in 2013 Almost 1 out of every 4 persons in the EU in this

More information

The value of accredited certification

The value of accredited certification Certified Once Accepted Everywhere The value of accredited certification Survey Report Published May 212 In 21/11, the IAF carried out a global survey to capture market feedback on the value of certification.

More information

PROJECT: EURO-AUDITS THE EUROPEAN ROAD SAFETY AUDITOR TRAINING SYLLABUS APPENDIX E SURVEY RESULTS. October 2007

PROJECT: EURO-AUDITS THE EUROPEAN ROAD SAFETY AUDITOR TRAINING SYLLABUS APPENDIX E SURVEY RESULTS. October 2007 PROJECT: EURO-AUDITS THE EUROPEAN ROAD SAFETY AUDITOR TRAINING SYLLABUS APPENDIX E SURVEY RESULTS October 2007 A European Commission co-funded project Appendix E Survey Results Contents: Survey Results

More information

Introduction to the European Patent Office and the European patent system

Introduction to the European Patent Office and the European patent system Introduction to the European Patent Office and the European patent system Michaël De Smet European Patent Office 28-09-202 Contents The European Patent Convention The European Patent Office The European

More information

ECDC SURVEILLANCE REPORT

ECDC SURVEILLANCE REPORT ECDC SURVEILLANCE REPORT Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Weekly report: Individual case reports EU/EEA countries 31 July 2009 Summary The pandemic A(H1N1) 2009 is still spreading despite the fact that the regular

More information

Introduction & background. 1 - About you. Case Id: b823b29e-8637-4944-bc79-92aaa8fb9093. Consultation document

Introduction & background. 1 - About you. Case Id: b823b29e-8637-4944-bc79-92aaa8fb9093. Consultation document Case Id: b823b29e-8637-4944-bc79-92aaa8fb9093 A strong European policy to support Small and Medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and entrepreneurs 2015-2020 Public consultation on the Small Business Act (SBA)

More information

Equity Release Schemes in the European Union

Equity Release Schemes in the European Union Reifner Clerc-Renaud Perez-Carillo Tiffe Knobloch Equity Release Schemes in the European Union institut fur finanzdienstleistungen e.v. Contents PREFACE I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY V TABLES XXIX FIGURES XXX 1.

More information

European Surveillance of Veterinary Antimicrobial Consumption (ESVAC):

European Surveillance of Veterinary Antimicrobial Consumption (ESVAC): 4 Focus Veterinary medicines European Surveillance of Veterinary Antimicrobial Consumption (ESVAC): Establishment of the project and key outputs Authors Kari Grave, ESVAC National Expert; David Mackay,

More information

SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES (SPS)

SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES (SPS) TEXTUAL PROPOSAL SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES (SPS) Article 1 Scope and coverage This Chapter applies to all SPS measures that may, directly or indirectly, affect trade between the Parties. This

More information

ANALYSIS OF THE STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION ON

ANALYSIS OF THE STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION ON ANALYSIS OF THE STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION ON Science and Technology, the key to Europe s future: guidelines for future European policy to support research COM(353)2004 DG Research, European Commission,

More information

REGULATION (EEC) No 2309/93

REGULATION (EEC) No 2309/93 REGULATION (EEC) No 2309/93 Council Regulation (EEC) No 2309/93 of 22 July 1993 laying down Community procedures for the authorization and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use

More information

Dear readers, Current EFSA co-operation projects. Editorial Dear readers Catherine Geslain-Lanéelle

Dear readers, Current EFSA co-operation projects. Editorial Dear readers Catherine Geslain-Lanéelle Moving together NEWS ON EUROPEAN FOOD OD SAFETY CO-OPERATION ISSN 1830-8252 D E C E M B E R 2 0 0 7 # 0 1 1 2 C o n t e n t s Editorial Dear readers Catherine Geslain-Lanéelle Feature EFSA co-operation

More information

Economic and Social Council

Economic and Social Council United Nations Economic and Social Council ECE/TRANS/WP.30/2013/12 Distr.: General 23 July 2013 Original: English Economic Commission for Europe Inland Transport Committee Working Party on Customs Questions

More information

European Food Safety Authority. External Evaluation of EFSA Final Report

European Food Safety Authority. External Evaluation of EFSA Final Report European Food Safety Authority External Evaluation of EFSA Final Report Contents 1. Executive summary... 8 1.1 Main findings... 8 1.2 Findings per thematic areas... 9 1.3 Transversal/strategic recommendations...

More information

Europeans and Nuclear Safety. Report

Europeans and Nuclear Safety. Report Special Eurobarometer European Commission Europeans and Nuclear Safety Fieldwork October - November 2006 Publication February 2007 Report Special Eurobarometer 271 / Wave 66.2 TNS Opinion & Social This

More information

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a RECOMMENDATION OF THE COUNCIL AND OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a RECOMMENDATION OF THE COUNCIL AND OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 12.10.2004 COM(2004) 642 final 2004/0239 (COD) Proposal for a RECOMMENDATION OF THE COUNCIL AND OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT on further European cooperation

More information

ARE THE POINTS OF SINGLE CONTACT TRULY MAKING THINGS EASIER FOR EUROPEAN COMPANIES?

ARE THE POINTS OF SINGLE CONTACT TRULY MAKING THINGS EASIER FOR EUROPEAN COMPANIES? ARE THE POINTS OF SINGLE CONTACT TRULY MAKING THINGS EASIER FOR EUROPEAN COMPANIES? SERVICES DIRECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION REPORT NOVEMBER 2011 EUROPEAN COMPANIES WANT WELL-FUNCTIONING POINTS OF SINGLE CONTACT

More information

Council of the European Union Brussels, 13 November 2015 (OR. en)

Council of the European Union Brussels, 13 November 2015 (OR. en) Council of the European Union Brussels, 13 November 2015 (OR. en) 12527/1/15 REV 1 LIMITE JAI 701 FRONT 202 COMIX 451 NOTE From: Presidency To: Working Party on Frontiers/Mixed Committee (EU-Iceland/Liechtenstein/Norway/Switzerland)

More information

Use of ITC infrastructures by company size. Percentage of enterprises

Use of ITC infrastructures by company size. Percentage of enterprises 26 June 2015 Survey on ICT and Electronic Commerce Use in Enterprises Year 2014 First quarter 2015 Main results - 98.4% of Spanish enterprises with 10 or more employees have Internet access in the first

More information

EUROPE 2020 TARGET: EARLY LEAVERS FROM EDUCATION AND TRAINING

EUROPE 2020 TARGET: EARLY LEAVERS FROM EDUCATION AND TRAINING EUROPE 2020 TARGET: EARLY LEAVERS FROM EDUCATION AND TRAINING By 2020, the share of early leavers from education and training (aged 18-24) should be less than 10% Early school leaving 1 is an obstacle

More information

EUROPEAN COMMISSION GUIDANCE DOCUMENT. Key questions related to import requirements and the new rules on food hygiene and official food controls

EUROPEAN COMMISSION GUIDANCE DOCUMENT. Key questions related to import requirements and the new rules on food hygiene and official food controls EUROPEAN COMMISSION GUIDANCE DOCUMENT Key questions related to import requirements and the new rules on food hygiene and official food controls EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX SANCO/1446/2005 Rev.2014

More information

The OIE Regional Communications Workshop. a Strategy for Animal Health Communication. As of 10 November 2009

The OIE Regional Communications Workshop. a Strategy for Animal Health Communication. As of 10 November 2009 The OIE Regional Communications Workshop a Strategy for Animal Health Communication As of 10 November 2009 Page 1 of 10 Background & Context Challenges Member countries in the Asia and Pacific region are

More information