1 Successive Cyclicity, Long-Distance Superiority, and Local Optimization Fabian Heck and Gereon Müller University of Stuttgart and University of Tübingen 1. Introduction It is not a priori clear how intermediate steps of successive-cyclic wh-movement can comply with (1), which requires movement to be feature-driven (Chomsky 1995). (1) LAST RESORT (LR): Movement must result in feature checking. A standard solution is the assumption that movement to intermediate SpecC Û positions is triggered by pseudo-wh-features which are either optionally present on C Û (Fanselow and Mahajan 2000, Collins 1997, and others), or which can optionally be inserted at the left edge of phases (Chomsky 1998). In this paper, we will argue for a different kind of approach: Whereas the last step of successive-cyclic wh-movement is triggered by a [+wh]-feature on C, an intermediate step is not feature-driven; rather, it is a repair operation that violates LAST RESORT in order to satisfy another constraint that we will call PHASE BALANCE. This presupposes constraint violability and constraint ranking, and thus suggests an optimality-theoretic approach: A repair is a competition in which the optimal candidate incurs an (otherwise fatal) violation of a high-ranked constraint C in order to respect an even higher-ranked constraint C. More specifically, we argue that successivecyclic wh-movement lends further support to the approach to repair-driven movement in Heck and Müller (2000) and Müller (2000), where evidence for an optimality-theoretic treatment of repair-driven scrambling, sluicing, quan- * We would like to thank Daniel Büring, Sandra Chung, Gisbert Fanselow, Jane Grimshaw, Wolfgang Sternefeld, and Bruce Tesar for helpful comments. Work on this paper was supported by DFG grants MU 1444/1-1,2-1. c 2000 Fabian Heck and Gereon Müller. WCCFL 19 Proceedings, ed. Billerey and Lillehaugen, pp Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
2 Heck and Müller 219 tifier raising, and remnant movement is presented. This approach presupposes that optimization proceeds locally, not globally (as is standardly assumed; cf. Prince and Smolensky 1993). The evidence from successive-cyclic whmovement reinforces this position: An offending property is removed instantaneously, not at some earlier or later stage in the derivation. Furthermore, we show that the repair approach to successive cyclicity offers an account of both long-distance superiority effects in German, and certain long-distance intervention effects that seem to have gone unnoticed so far Local vs. Global Optimization Global (standard) optimization applies once to complete structures. Local optimization, however, applies iteratively to small portions of structure. On this view, syntactic structure is created derivationally, with each XP a cyclic node, as in Chomsky (1995). Structure building operations obey an inviolable STRICT CYCLE CONDITION (Chomsky 1973, Perlmutter and Soames 1979), a version of which is given in (2): (2) STRICT CYCLE CONDITION (SCC): ½ Within the current cyclic domain D, Merge/Move may not target a position that is included within another cyclic domain D ¼, such that D properly includes D ¼. Based on a given input, the operations Merge and Move create various XP outputs «½,...,«Ò : the candidate set M. M is then subjected to an optimization procedure. The optimal output «(a subderivation) is the one that respects all inviolable constraints (e.g., the SCC), and that also best satisfies an ordered set of violable constraints. «then serves as the input for the next cycle, and so on, until the numeration is empty and the sentence complete. As a consequence, structure that has not yet been created at a given point of the derivation cannot have any impact on the current optimization procedure: Local optimization does not have look-ahead capacity The Problem There is evidence from a variety of languages that long-distance wh-movement across a CP applies successive-cyclically, by an intermediate movement step to SpecC Û. ¾ An example from German is given in (3). 1. For derivations of the SCC, see Chomsky (1995), Boskovic and Lasnik (1999). 2. Morphological or syntactic reflexes of this movement step include the choice of complementizer in Modern Irish (McCloskey 1979), wh-agreement in Chamorro
3 220 WCCFL 19 (3) [ CP Wen ½ hat er gesagt [ CP t ¼ daß ½ whom has he said that Maria Maria t ½ liebt ]]? loves The derivation underlying (3) must be D ½, not D ¾ or D. (4) Cyclic Derivation D ½ a. [ TP Maria wen ½ liebt ] + C,(wen wh ½ moves to SpecC ) b. [ CP wen ½ daß Maria t ½ liebt ] c. [ TP er gesagt hat [ CP wen ½ daß Maria t ½ liebt ]] +C,(wen wh ½ moves to SpecC ; V/2) d. [ CP Wen ½ hat er gesagt [ CP t ¼ daß Maria t ½ ½ liebt ]] (5) Acyclic Derivation D ¾ a. [ TP Maria wen ½ liebt ] + C,(wen wh ½ does not move) b. [ CP daß Maria wen ½ liebt ] c. [ TP er gesagt hat [ CP daß Maria wen ½ liebt ]] +C,(wen wh ½ moves to SpecC, via SpecC ; V/2) d. [ CP Wen ½ hat er gesagt [ CP t ¼ daß Maria t ½ ½ liebt ]] (6) One-step Derivation D a. [ TP Maria wen ½ liebt ] + C,(wen wh ½ does not move) b. [ CP daß Maria wen ½ liebt ] c. [ TP er gesagt hat [ CP daß Maria wen ½ liebt ]] +C,(wen wh ½ moves to SpecC ; V/2) d. [ CP Wen ½ hat er gesagt [ CP daß Maria t ½ liebt ]] D ¾ is not available since movement to SpecC violates the SCC. D,in contrast, does without the intermediate wh-movement step. This derivation is incompatible with the evidence for successive cyclicity just cited; furthermore, it involves a non-local wh-chain of a type that (fatally) violates locality requirements (see below). D ½ respects both the SCC and locality by applying wh-movement to SpecC in the step from (4-a) to (4-b). However, the trig- (Chung 1982), partial wh-movement in Ancash Quechua (Cole 1982) and Iraqi Arabic (Wahba 1992), obligatory V-to-C raising with (certain types of) wh-phrases in Spanish (Torrego 1984) and Basque (Ortiz de Urbina 1989), the selection of subject pronouns by C in Ewe (Collins 1994), tonal downstep in Kikuyu (Clements, McClocksey, Maling, and Zaenen 1983), men deletion in colloquial Singapore Malay (Cole and Hermon 2000), wh-copying in German (Fanselow and Mahajan 2000) and Africaans (Plessis 1977), and obligatory CP extraposition in German (Müller 1999).
4 Heck and Müller 221 ger for wh-movement the [+wh]-feature of C is not yet available at this point of the derivation. Thus, either there is a different trigger (a pseudo-whfeature), or LR is violated by this operation. We suggest the latter. Then, the question arises as to what property of the derivational stage involving TP and C Û in (4-a) forces a violation of LR by wh-movement to SpecC. The property cannot possibly be inherent in either TP or C Û. The reason is that the embedded TP and C Û are identical in the multiple question in (7-a), where wh-movement to SpecC is impossible (cf. (7-b)); partial whmovement is only permitted in German if SpecC Û is filled by a scope marker, not by another wh-phrase. (7) a. [ CP Wer ¾ hat t ¾ gesagt [ CP daß Maria wen ½ liebt ]? who has said that Maria whom loves b. *[ CP Wer ¾ hat t ¾ gesagt [ CP wen ½ (daß) Maria t ½ liebt ]? who has said whom that Maria loves The crucial distinction seems to be that there is another wh-phrase that eventually checks the [+wh]-feature of the matrix C in (7), whereas there is no such wh-phrase in (3). Given this state of affairs, the task is to find a way to determine whether wh-movement to SpecC Û does or does not apply at the derivational stage (4-a) on a local basis, without look-ahead capacity providing information about later stages of the derivation. This can be achieved by employing the concept of numeration, i.e., the array of lexical material that is used in a derivation (Chomsky 1995): At any given stage, the derivation has access to what is left in the numeration. The constraint that outranks LR and triggers successive-cyclic movement relies on information of this type. 2. Repair-Driven Wh-Movement We propose that the constraint in question is (8). (8) PHASE BALANCE (PB): Phases must be balanced: If P is a phase candidate, then for every feature F in the numeration there must be a distinct potentially available 3. The same problem arises in an approach that employs pseudo-wh-features. 4. Isn t this another form of look-ahead? The question is primarily terminological, since there can be little doubt that this kind of procedure is much more restricted it utilizes a concept that has been proposed for independent reasons, and it does not have access to structural information provided by later parts of the derivation.
5 222 WCCFL 19 checker for F. The notions phase and potentially available must be clarified. Every CP constitutes a phase in the sense of Chomsky (1998), Chomsky (1999), i.e., a special derivational unit. Syntactic material counts as potentially available within the current phase P if it is either part of the numeration or at the left edge (i.e., in SpecC) of P. Thus, PB forces material from the current phase P that is supposed to check a feature within a higher phase P ¼ to move to the edge of P, in violation of LR. Given that LR is violable and ranked below PB, successive-cyclic wh-movement now emerges as a repair strategy. Before we continue, two further constraints need to be introduced. The first one is obvious: In addition to a constraint that blocks movement that is not feature-driven (LR), there must be a complementary constraint that forces features to be checked by movement (Chomsky 1995): (9) FEATURE CONDITION (FC): Features must be checked by overt movement. The second constraint may be less obvious: FEATURE FAITHFULNESS prohibits the deletion of features that are present in the input (Legendre, Smolensky, and Wilson 1998). In the present context, this constraint mainly serves the purpose of accounting for absolute ungrammaticality (ineffability) of certain sentences. The proposed ranking is PB, FC FF LR. (10) FEATURE FAITHFULNESS (FF): Features must not be deleted. 5. Whether or not vp is also a phase is irrelevant for present purposes; but cf. Heck and Müller (2000) for evidence against this. 6. Material that is part of a tree that has been created earlier and has not yet been used in the derivation is not included in either the numeration or the current phase. Items in these external trees belong to the work space of the derivation (also cf. the complex notion of representation in Frampton & Gutman 1999), just like items in the numeration; we assume that they also count as potentially available. In what follows, we understand the notion of numeration in this extended sense, as comprising all derivational material outside the current tree. 7. Since we are only concerned with overt movement here, we abstract away from the issue of strength.
6 Heck and Müller Simple Questions We can now reconsider the case of successive-cyclic wh-movement in a simple question; cf. (3). The following two tableaux illustrate the optimization of the embedded and the matrix phase, respectively. Consider first T ½. T ½ : Local optimization of embedded phase Input: [ ÌÈ wh ½ ], C wh Numeration = C wh, FC PB FF LR O ½ :[ È C wh wh ½ ] *! O ¾ :[ È C wh wh ½ wh ] *! * O :[ È wh ½ C wh t ½ ] * As soon as CP is created by merging C and TP, PB becomes important. Since there is still a [+wh]-feature in the numeration but no potentially available item to check it, CP can be balanced only by movement of the TPinternal wh-phrase to the left edge of CP, in violation of LR; see output O. If the wh-phrase stays in situ, as in output O ½, PB is fatally violated. Deletion of the [+wh]-feature of the wh-phrase as in output O ¾ is even worse since it violates both PB and FF without improving the output s constraint profile. Note that an output candidate that has been eliminated cannot be continued, and can thus never serve as the basis for any further competition: Once classified as suboptimal, it will never be reconsidered. Only the optimal output of T ½ serves as the input for subsequent optimization. Tableau T ¾ shows the last cycle of the matrix phase competition. T ¾ : Local optimization of matrix phase Input: [ ÌÈ [ È wh ½ C wh t ½ ]], C wh Numeration = FC PB FF LR O ½ :[ È C wh [ È wh ½ C wh t ½ O ¾ :[ È C wh [ È wh ½ wh C wh t ½ O :[ È wh ½ C wh [ È t¼ ½ C wh t ½ ] ] *! ] *!* The optimal candidate O moves the wh-phrase and checks the [+wh]- 8. The candidates here are prefixed by 3 so as to indicate that they are all descen-
7 224 WCCFL 19 feature of C. Again, strategies that delete some features or leave the [+wh]- feature on C unchecked do worse. PB is satisfied vacuously since there is no further material in the numeration Long-Distance Superiority Let us now turn to multiple questions. German is like English in that only one wh-phrase moves overtly; cf. (11): (11) *Wer ¾ who wen ½ hat whom has t ¾ t ½ getroffen? met Given that overt wh-movement in German is triggered by a [+wh]-feature on C (not by a [+wh]-feature on wh-phrases), this follows from LR. Next, recall that in multiple questions where one wh-phrase originates in a matrix clause and another wh-phrase originates in an embedded clause, the second wh-phrase must stay in situ; cf. (7-a), which is repeated here. (12) Wer ¾ who hat t ¾ gesagt [ CP daß has said that Maria wen ½ Maria whom liebt ]? loves Wh-movement of the embedded wh-phrase to the embedded SpecC Û position is impossible (blocked by LR) since there is another wh-phrase in the numeration that is potentially available for checking the [+wh]-feature of C. In other words: PB can be satisfied without movement. Hence, the embedded wh-phrase stays in situ; cf. T. T : Local optimization of embedded phase Input: [ ÌÈ wh ½ ], C wh Numeration = C, wh wh ¾ FC PB FF LR O ½ :[ È C wh wh ½ ] O ¾ :[ È C wh wh ½ wh O :[ È wh ½ C wh t ½ ] *! ] *! The optimal output O ½ of tableau T again serves as the input for subsequent cycles. Suppose now that different matrix phases based on O ½ have been constructed. PB is not an issue then since no material is left within the numeration. But the [+wh]-feature of matrix C has to be checked. As it stands, both wh-phrases could in principle accomplish this. However, on the one hand dants of O in T ½.
8 Heck and Müller 225 this would reintroduce the possibility of one-step long-distance movement as in (6) in multiple questions, obviously an unwanted result. On the other hand, this prediction is not empirically correct. German exhibits a long-distance superiority effect in this context (Buering and Hartmann 1994) only the higher wh-phrase can check the [+wh]-feature. Compare (12) with (13). (13) *Wen ½ hat wer ¾ gesagt whom has who said [ CP daß Maria that Maria t ½ liebt ]? loves At first sight, it looks as though this long-distance superiority effect could be derived by whatever accounts for clause-bound, standard superiority effects; e.g., the Minimal Link Condition (MLC) (Chomsky 1995). This is not an option for German, though: German does not have superiority effects with clause-bound wh-movement; cf. (14) (Haider 1983). (14) a. Wer ¾ hat t ¾ wen ½ getroffen? who has whom met b. Wen ½ hat wer ¾ t ½ getroffen? whom has who met This strongly suggests that long-distance superiority effects are to be explained independently of the issue of clause-bound superiority effects. We will assume that long-distance superiority effects are due to the following highranked locality constraint (cf. Chomsky 1998): (15) PHASE IMPENETRABILITY CONDITION (PIC): Move operates only on locally available items. Syntactic material counts as locally available within the current phase P if it is contained within P or at the left edge of the last phase P ¼. Since optimization of the embedded CP has filtered out the candidate that moves the lower wh-phrase to the embedded SpecC position (cf. T ), any movement operation applying to this wh-phrase in the matrix CP will fatally violate the PIC, and long-distance superiority is accounted for; cf. T. O ½ (= (12)) checks the matrix [+wh]-feature with the higher wh-phrase; all constraints are respected. In contrast, O ½¾ (= (13)) fatally violates the PIC. 9. This analysis builds on the proposal made in Chomsky (1998). The interaction of the PIC and PB in the present system is roughly comparable to that of the PIC and condition (24) in Chomsky s feature-based system, with PB a strengthened form of his (24).
9 226 WCCFL 19 T : Local optimization of matrix phase Input: [ ÌÈ wh ¾ [ È C wh wh ½ ]], C wh Numeration = FC PB PIC FF LR O ½½ :[ È C wh wh ¾ [ È C wh wh ½ ]] *! O ½¾ :[ È wh ½ C wh wh ¾ [ È C wh t ½ ]] *! O ½ :[ È C wh wh ¾ wh [ È C wh wh ½ wh ]] *!** O ½ :[ È wh ¾ C wh t ¾ [ È C wh wh ½ ]] Finally, O ½ deletes the [+wh]-feature on the C-head and on the wh-phrases, turning them into wh-indefinites; this violates FF. ½¼ 2.3. Further Long-Distance Intervention Effects This approach makes an interesting prediction: Long-distance wh-movement should also be impossible if there is another wh-element in the numeration (more generally, outside the current tree; cf. footnote 6) that eventually ends up in a more deeply embedded position, e.g., in an island. This prediction is indeed borne out in German. (16) illustrates a long-distance intervention effect with wh-in situ inside an adjunct; (17) with wh-in situ inside an NP/CP structure; and (18) with wh-in situ inside an NP/PP configuration. (16) a. Wen ½ hat Fritz [ CP nachdem er whom has Fritz after he getroffen? met was ¾ what gemacht hat ] t ½ done has 10. Wh-movement from infinitives in German does not give rise to clear superiority effects (Fanselow 1991), modulo some minor variation between restructuring infinitives and others, and a non-identity requirement on wh-phrases (Haider 2000). This suggests that German infinitives are not phases. Indeed, extraction from German infinitives does not trigger obligatory extraposition either; cf. footnote 2.
10 Heck and Müller 227 b. *Wen ½ hat whom has [ CP (t ¼ ½) daß that Fritz [ CP nachdem er was ¾ Fritz after he what Maria t ½ liebt ]? Maria loves gemacht hat ] gesagt done has said (17) a.?wen ½ hat Fritz [ NP einem Mann [ CP der was ¾ kennt ]] t ½ whom has Fritz a man Ø that what knows vorgestellt? introduced b. *Wen ½ hat Fritz whom has Fritz gesagt [ CP (t ¼ ½) daß said that [ NP einem Mann [ CP der a man Ø that er t ½ einladen soll ]? he invite should was ¾ kennt ]] what knows (18) a. Wen ½ hat whom has? vorgestellt introduced b.?*wen ½ hat whom has (t ¼ ½) daß Maria that Maria Fritz [ NP einem Freund von Fritz a friend Ø of Fritz [ NP einem Fritz a t ½ liebt ]? loves Freund von friend Ø of wem ¾ ] t ½ whom wem ¾ ] gesagt [ CP whom said The well-formed (a)-examples involve clause-bound, feature-driven whmovement of wh ½. The (b)-examples are interesting, though: They are just as ill formed as long-distance superiority cases, even though the intervening wh ¾ does not c-command the base position of wh ½. This is unexpected under standard (e.g., MLC-based) approaches to superiority. Here, these intervention effects without c-command are treated in exactly the same way as the long-distance superiority effects: Repair-driven movement of wh ½ in the lower CP is blocked by LR (PB is fulfilled by the potential availability of wh ¾ ), and feature-driven movement of wh ½ in the higher CP fatally violates the PIC. Still, there is a difference: In the superiority case, the higher wh ¾ moves to the matrix SpecC position. In the present case, wh ¾ cannot move either; compare, e.g., (16-b) and (19).
11 228 WCCFL 19 (19) *Was ¾ hat what has Maria wen ½ Fritz Fritz liebt ]? Maria whom loves [ CP nachdem er after he t ¾ gemacht hat ] gesagt [ CP daß done has said that The reason is that wh ¾ moves across a barrier. This fatally violates the CED (Huang 1982, Chomsky 1986), which we assume to also outrank FF. (20) CONDITION ON EXTRACTION DOMAIN (CED): a. Movement must not cross a barrier. b. An XP is a barrier if it is a non-complement. Thus, if O ½ in T violates a high-ranked CED, the optimal candidate will be O ½, which deletes three [+wh]-features and thereby violates FF. This candidate neutralizes, the wh-features of the input, and the result is (21), with indefinite readings of the two wh-phrases and a declarative matrix C head. ½½ (21) Fritz hat [ CP nachdem er Fritz has after he Maria wen liebt ] wh Maria someone loves was wh something gemacht hat ] gesagt [ CP daß done has said that On this basis, we can give an argument for local as opposed to global optimization. Since we presuppose the existence of repair-driven wh-movement, and since in a global approach all structural information is given from the very start, we would expect that in order to avoid a CED or FF violation, the lower wh ½ should be check the matrix feature, which only violates LR. Then, sentences like (16-b) should be well formed after all. This wrong prediction of global optimization is shown in T ( indicates the wrong optimal output). Recall that in the matrix competition of the local approach, candidate O ½ from tableau T is not an option since it is based on output O from tableau T : a candidate that has already been eliminated in the competition of the embedded phase because its LR violation is locally unmotivated. 11. This output can also be generated on the basis of an input that has indefinites and declarative C to begin with. More generally, the neutralization approach to ungrammaticality (ineffability) gives rise to derivational ambiguities that can only be filtered out by additional assumptions (cf. input optimization in Prince and Smolensky 1993).
12 Heck and Müller 229 T : Global optimization of complete sentence Input: [ È C wh [ Á Ð Ò wh ¾ ] [ È C wh wh ½ ]]] Numeration = CED FC PIC FF LR O ½½ :[ È C wh [ Á Ð Ò wh ¾ ] *! [ È C wh wh ½ ]] O ½¾ :[ È wh ½ C [ wh Á Ð Ò wh ¾ ] [ È C wh t ½ ]] *! O ½ :[ È C wh [ Á Ð Ò wh ] ¾ wh [ È C wh wh ½ wh ]] *!** O ½ :[ È wh ¾ C [ wh Á Ð Ò t ¾ ] [ È C wh wh ½ ]] *! O ½ :[ È wh ½ C wh [ Á Ð Ò wh ¾ ] [ È t¼ ½ C wh t ½ ]] * 2.4. A Potential Problem Examples like (22) show that the approach is too restrictive as it stands. (22) [ NP Die Frage [ CP wer ½ C t wh ½ was ¾ mitbringt ]] ist relevant the question who what brings is relevant für to die Frage the question [ CP wie how Fritz denkt [ CP t ¼ daß die Fritz thinks that the Party t wird ]] party will be CP optimization raises the question of whether wie moves to SpecC. Since the CP phase turns out to be balanced without such movement (wer ½ and was ¾ are potentially available for the [+wh]-features of C and C ), one would wrongly expect wie to stay in situ. The problem here is that either was ¾ or wer ½ fools wie : The wh-phrases do not compete for the same target position. Hence, was ¾ /wer ½ should not qualify as a potentially available checker for the [+wh]-feature that is supposed to be checked by wie. To execute this idea, let us assume that wh-features are accompanied by scope indices in the numeration. Then, XP Û will never count as a potentially available checker for a contra-indexed feature on C Û, due to feature mismatch. 3. Conclusion We have argued that successive-cyclic wh-movement to SpecC Û positions should be viewed as repair- rather than feature-driven movement, in viola-
13 230 WCCFL 19 tion of LR. The analysis is developed within a new approach to syntactic optimization that is both local and derivational, and that centers around constraints related to CP phases (PB, PIC). This local approach to repair-driven wh-movement is corroborated by long-distance superiority effects as well as by certain long-distance intervention effects which are initially surprising; and it can be shown to be empirically preferable to an approach in terms of global optimization. References Barbosa, Pilar, Danny Fox, Paul Hagstrom, Martha McGinnis, and David Pesetsky, eds (1998): Is the best good enough? Optimality and competition in syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Bošković, Željko and Howard Lasnik (1999): How Strict Is the Cycle?, Linguistic Inquiry 30, Büring, Daniel and Katharina Hartmann (1994): The Dark Side of Wh-Movement, Linguistische Berichte 149, Chomsky, Noam (1973): Conditions on Transformations. In: S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky, eds, A Festschrift for Morris Halle. Academic Press, New York, pp Chomsky, Noam (1986): Barriers. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Chomsky, Noam (1995): The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Chomsky, Noam (1998): Minimalist Inquiries: the framework, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 15. Chomsky, Noam (1999): Derivation by Phase, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18. Chung, Sandra (1982): Unbounded Dependencies in Chamorro Grammar, Linguistic Inquiry 13, Clements, George, James McCloskey, Joan Maling, and Annie Zaenen (1983): String- Vacuous Rule Application, Linguistic Inquiry 14, Cole, Peter (1982): Subjacency and Successive Cyclicity: Evidence from Ancash Quechua, Journal of Linguistic Research 2, Cole, Peter and Gabriella Hermon (2000): Partial Wh-Movement: Evidence from Malay. In Lutz, Müller & von Stechow (2000). Collins, Chris (1994): Economy of Derivation and the Generalized Proper Binding Condition, Linguistic Inquiry 25,
14 Heck and Müller 231 Collins, Chris (1997): Local Economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachussets. Fanselow, Gisbert (1991): Minimale Syntax. Habilitation, University of Passau. Fanselow, Gisbert and Anoop Mahajan (2000): Towards a Minimalist Theory of Wh-Expletives, Wh-Copying, and Successive Cyclicity. In Lutz et al. (2000), pp Frampton, John and Sam Gutman (1999): Cyclic Computation, Syntax 2(1), Haider, Hubert (1983): Connectedness Effects in German, Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 23, Haider, Hubert (2000): Towards a Superior Account of Superiority. In Lutz et al. (2000). Heck, Fabian and Gereon Müller (2000): Repair-Driven Movement and the Local Optimization of Derivations. Ms., Universität Stuttgart and Universität Tübingen. Huang, Cheng-Teh James (1982): Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Legendre, Géraldine, Paul Smolensky, and Colin Wilson (1998): When is less more? Faithfulness and Minimal Links in WH-Chains. In Barbosa, Fox, Hagstrom, McGinnis & Pesetsky (1998), pp Lutz, Uli, Gereon Müller, and Arnim von Stechow, eds (2000): Wh-Scope Marking. Benjamins, Amsterdam. McCloskey, James (1979): Transformational Syntax and Model Theoretic Semantics: A Case Study in Modern Irish. Reidel, Dordrecht. Müller, Gereon (1999): Imperfect Checking, The Linguistic Review 16(4), Müller, Gereon (2000): Shape Conservation and Remnant Movement. To appear in: Proceedings of NELS 30. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA. Ortiz de Urbina, Jon (1989): Parameters in the Grammar of Basque. Foris, Dordrecht. Perlmutter, David and Scott Soames (1979): Syntactic Argumentation and the Structure of English. The University of California Press, Berkeley. Plessis, Hans du (1977): Wh-Movement in Afrikaans, Linguistic Inquiry 8, Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky (1993): Optimality Theory. Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Ms., Rutgers University and University of Colorado at Boulder. Torrego, Esther (1984): On Inversion in Spanish and Some of Its Effects, Linguistic Inquiry 15, Wahba, Wafaa Abdel-Faheem Batran (1992): LF Movement in Iraqi Arabic. In: C.- T. J. Huang and R. May, eds, Logical Structure and Linguistic Structure. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp
Derivational Optimization of Wh-Movement Fabian Heck & Gereon Müller Universität Leipzig 1. Introduction An idea that was originally proposed by Bresnan (1971; 1972) has been resurrected in recent syntactic
Movement and Binding Gereon Müller Institut für Linguistik Universität Leipzig SoSe 2008 www.uni-leipzig.de/ muellerg Gereon Müller (Institut für Linguistik) Constraints in Syntax 4 SoSe 2008 1 / 35 Principles
A Problem of/for Tough Movement Randall Hendrick University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill October 2013 Abstract This paper aims to further our understanding of complements to tough movement predicates
Lecture 1: OT An Introduction 1 Generative Linguistics and OT Starting point: Generative Linguistics Sources: Archangeli 1997; Kager 1999, Section 1; Prince & Smolensky 1993; Barbosa et al. 1998, intro.
Verb-Second as vp-first October 29, 2002 Gereon Müller IDS Mannheim To appear in the Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics Address: Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) Postfach 10 16 21 D-68016 Mannheim
Julia Bacskai-Atkari 25th Scandinavian Conference University of Potsdam (SFB-632) in Linguistics (SCL-25) email@example.com Reykjavík, 13 15 May 2013 0. Introduction Extended Projections
SLL 516: STRUCTURE OF MODERN RUSSIAN: MORPHOLOGY AND SYNTAX Class information: Spring 2008 Tuesday 2-4:50 GFS 204 Instructor: Prof. Roumyana Pancheva GFS 301S, by appt. firstname.lastname@example.org Class description:
Constraints in Phrase Structure Grammar Phrase Structure Grammar no movement, no transformations, context-free rules X/Y = X is a category which dominates a missing category Y Let G be the set of basic
Some Remarks on Phrasal Comparatives Winfried Lechner, Umass/Amherst (email: email@example.com) International Syntax Roundtable, Ypps/Danube. July 6-9, 1997 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. INITIAL SET OF DATA (1)
Outline Academic skills: Abstract writing Doreen Georgi 1 Model abstracts 2 3 Structure of an abstract April 14, 2015 4 What else abstract writing may be good for Doreen Georgi (Leipzig University, IGRA)
Bound and Referential Pronouns and Ellipsis Heim and Kratzer Chapter 9 1 9.1 Referential pronouns as free variables 2 9.1.1 Deictic versus anaphoric, referential versus bound-variable pronouns In traditional
Subparts of contrastive topics and the syntax information structure interface Marta Wierzba (Universität Potsdam) Leipzig ConSOLE XX January 7th, 2012 Contents The syntax information structure interface
A (Covert) Long Distance Anaphor in English Christopher Kennedy and Jeffrey Lidz Northwestern University 1. Introduction The empirical focus of this paper is the distribution of strict and sloppy interpretations
1 Introduction Wh-in-Situ and the Spanish DP: Movement or No Movement? Lara Reglero and Emma Ticio Two main theories compete to analyze wh-in-situ constructions in the Spanish clause: The movement approach
A Scope Freezing Effect with Negated Quantifiers Chris Collins September 2016 Abstract: I document a scope freezing effect found with negated quantifiers (distinct from the scope freezing effect discussed
Pre-Minimalist Syntax * Chomsky, Noam. 1995. Chapter 1: The Theory of Principles and Parameters, in The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press (also published as Chomsky, Noam and Howard Lasnik.
Basic syntax of quantifiion in English Jeff peaks phil 43916 eptember 15, 2014 1 The problem posed by quantified sentences.................... 1 2 Basic syntactic egories for quantifiion in English..............
Is there repair by ellipsis? Craig Sailor University of Groningen firstname.lastname@example.org Carson T. Schütze UCLA email@example.com Draft: December, 2014 Written for The book of syntactic questions 100 ideas
Optimality-Theoretic Syntax Gereon Müller (Universität Leipzig) Comparing Frameworks, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics (OTS) September 24-26, 2009 Contents 1. Model of Grammar 1 2. Evidence for OT Analyses
Superiority: Syntax or Semantics? Düsseldorf Jul02 Jill devilliers, Tom Roeper, Jürgen Weissenborn Smith,Umass,Potsdam Introduction I. Question: When does a child know the grammaticality difference between
Wh Movement in Afrikaans Author(s): Hans du Plessis Reviewed work(s): Source: Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 8, No. 4 (Autumn, 1977), pp. 723-726 Published by: The MIT Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4178017.
Resumption by Buffers: German Relative Clauses Gereon Müller Abstract In a local derivational (phase-based) approach to syntax, instances of resumption in German (longdistance) relativization constructions
References Alexiadou, A. 1997. Adverb Placement ---------- A Case Study in Antisymmetric Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Austin, J. L. 1956. "A plea for excuses," in Urmason & Warnock (eds.) Philosophical
Einführung: Was ist Restbewegung und warum ist dieses Phänomen interessant? 1. Background: Rule Interaction 1.1 Counter-Feeding and Counter-Bleeding Gereon Müller (Universität Leipzig) October 15, 2013
September 2010, Volume 7, No.9 (Serial No.81) Sino-US English Teaching, ISSN 1539-8072, USA The syntactic positions of adverbs and the Second Language Acquisition ZHANG Zi-hong (Department of Foreign Language
Clause Types A descriptive tangent into the types of clauses Clause = subject+predicate phrase Clause = subject+predicate phrase subject: the NP being assigned a property Clause = subject+predicate phrase
Structure of Clauses March 9, 2004 Preview Comments on HW 6 Schedule review session Finite and non-finite clauses Constituent structure of clauses Structure of Main Clauses Discuss HW #7 Course Evals Comments
1 Semantics I April 16 Lambda and Relative Clause Adjectives Two ways to combine an adjective and a noun red book (1) via Functional Application: Px[red'(x) P(x)]y[book'(y)]) = x[red'(x) y[book'(y)](x)]
Quantificational DPs, Part 3: Covert Movement vs. Type Shifting 1 1. Introduction Thus far, we ve considered two competing analyses of sentences like those in (1). (1) Sentences Where a Quantificational
1 Right Node Raising and the LCA CHRIS WILDER 1 Constituent sharing in coordination In (1), a typical right node raising (RNR) sentence, the object the book is a constituent shared by the verbs of both
Much ado about was: Why German directly depends on indirect dependency This paper sets out to challenge the widely held assumption that the Direct Dependency Approach (DDA) is the most suitable analysis
Adjacency, PF, and extraposition Susi Wurmbrand and Jonathan David Bobaljik 1. Dutch 1 In the OV Germanic languages, certain verbs selecting infinitival complements (roughly, the restructuring predicates)
Coherent infinitives in German: An experimental perspective Tanja Schmid, Markus Bader & Josef Bayer University of Konstanz, Germany firstname.lastname@example.org 1 Introduction Since Bech (1955/57) and
Comments on Pullum AD NEELEMAN 1. Marr s Three Levels of Description My comments on Pullum s article will follow after a considerable detour. But for those who want to know where I am headed, let me summarize
There are differences in constituent ordering within the determiner phrase (DP) between English and Romance language though they are head-initial languages. The noun (N) is in the right edge within the
AnInterval-Based Semantics for Degree Questions: Negative Islands and Their Obviation Márta Abrusán and Benjamin Spector InstitutJean-Nicod(CNRS,Paris) and Harvard University Introduction The goal of this
Andrew Murphy Curriculum Vitae Universität Leipzig Institut für Linguistik Beethovenstraße 31 D-04107 Leipzig, Germany..... email@example.com home.uni-leipzig.de/murphy/ Education 04/2014 present
Lecture 4 Deep Structure and Transformations Thus far, we got the impression that the base component (phrase structure rules and lexicon) of the Standard Theory of syntax generates sentences and assigns
V. DAYAL AND A. MAHAJAN CLAUSE STRUCTURE IN SOUTH ASIAN LANGUAGES: GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1. SOUTH ASIAN LANGUAGES IN GENERATIVE GRAMMAR There is a tension between the demands of descriptive and explanatory
SYNTAX Syntax the study of the system of rules and categories that underlies sentence formation. 1) Syntactic categories lexical: - words that have meaning (semantic content) - words that can be inflected
A Minimalist View on the Syntax of BECOME * Sze-Wing Tang The Hong Kong Polytechnic University 301 1. Introduction In his seminal study of lexical decomposition of English verbs, McCawley (1968) proposes
This is an extended version of a paper that should appear on Journal of Psycholinguistic Research (2014) October 2013 On directionality of phrase structure building Cristiano Chesi (NETS, IUSS Pavia) Abstract
COMPARATIVES WITHOUT DEGREES: A NEW APPROACH FRIEDERIKE MOLTMANN IHPST, Paris firstname.lastname@example.org It has become common to analyse comparatives by using degrees, so that John is happier than Mary would
Perspectives on Computer Intelligence Can computers think? In attempt to make sense of this question Alan Turing, John Searle and Daniel Dennett put fourth varying arguments in the discussion surrounding
The compositional semantics of same Mike Solomon Amherst College Abstract Barker (2007) proposes the first strictly compositional semantic analysis of internal same. I show that Barker s analysis fails
5th Week Ways of making a phrase, clause, and sentence 1. Ways of making Phrase Before explaining the way of making phrase, we need to understand the basic concepts in advance. Words are the most basic
Brochure More information from http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/2853521/ Contrasting English and German Grammar: An Introduction to Syntax and Semantics Description: This book offers an introduction
Syntax II, Handout #4 Universität Stuttgart, SOSES 2006 Winfried Lechner Wed 14.00-15.30, Room 11.71 VERB CLASSES 1. CONTROL VS. RAISING VERBS The distinction between raising and control verbs is not always
Optimality Theory and Human Sentence Processing: The Case of Coordination John C. J. Hoeks (email@example.com) Center for Language and Cognition, University of Groningen, PO Box 716, 9700 AS Groningen,
FORUM Continuous Acceptability, Categorical Grammaticality, and Experimental Syntax Jon Sprouse 1. Introduction It almost goes without saying that acceptability judgments form a continuous spectrum. While
Syntax: Phrases Sentences can be divided into phrases. A phrase is a group of words forming a unit and united around a head, the most important part of the phrase. The head can be a noun NP, a verb VP,
Introduction to Transformational Grammar, LINGUIST 601 September 14, 2006 Phrase Structure Rules, Tree Rewriting, and other sources of Recursion Structure within the 1 Trees (1) a tree for the brown fox
SATU MANNINEN 1 Introduction In this paper, I investigate the construction found in English and a number of other languages in which the nominal head of a relative clause becomes separated from the rest
PP EXTRAPOSITION FROM NP IN DUTCH C. Jan-Wouter Zwart 1990 0. Summary* Movement to the right is very different from movement to the left. Whereas Wh-movement (extraction) of NP internal PPs is severely
ISSN 1798-4769 Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 1, No. 6, pp. 926-934, November 2010 Manufactured in Finland. doi:10.4304/jltr.1.6.926-934 Drawing Tree Diagrams: Problems and Suggestions
Kraków Syntax Lab 2016 October 8, 2016 Institute of English Studies Jagiellonian University Clause-mates, phases, and bound pronouns Howard Lasnik University of Maryland firstname.lastname@example.org (1) What did each
COURSE INFORMATION GRAMMATICAL THEORIES OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE Degree in English Philology Academic Year 2011-12 Optional course, 5 th year Annual course: 3 hours a week, 2 days a week. 9 credits TEACHING
AN AUGMENTED STATE TRANSITION NETWORK ANALYSIS PROCEDURE Daniel G. Bobrow Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Inc. Cambridge, Massachusetts Bruce Eraser Language Research Foundation Cambridge, Massachusetts Summary
The Comparative Construction and the Wh-Movement Wei-wen Liao National Tsing Hua University 1. Introduction Studies of the syntax of the comparative construction generally focuses on three aspects (cf.
Varieties of specification and underspecification: A view from semantics Torgrim Solstad D1/B4 SFB meeting on long-term goals June 29th, 2009 The technique of underspecification I Presupposed: in semantics,
2 What is a sentence? Morphology & Syntax Sentences Sentence as a informational-discursive unit A complete thought, generally including a topic and a comment about the topic Boys are naughtier. Boys will
COPULAR CLAUSES IN ENGLISH * Masatake Arimoto Nanzan University 1. Introduction English has copular verb be as exemplified in sentences like (1) and (2). (1) a. John is honest. b. John is a philosopher.
Sounds Like Like Peter Lasersohn University of Rochester Abstract: It is argued that the verb sound is ambiguous between one reading where it denotes a two-place relation between individuals and properties,
Linear Compression as a Trigger for Movement 1 Andrea Carlo Moro 1. Beyond Explanatory Adequacy : How the World Shapes Grammar A new challenge has been addressed in generative grammar in a recent paper
Spring 2012, April 5 Missing morphology Variability in acquisition Morphology and functional structure Morphosyntax in acquisition In L1A, we observe that kids don t always provide all the morphology that
Gengo Kenkyu 137: 1 16 2010 1 A Phase-Based Analysis of Adverb Licensing Eiko Mizuno Nagoya Institute of Technology Abstract: This paper offers a phase-based analysis of adverb licensing, focusing on speech-act
Ethan Poole email@example.com http://ethanpoole.com Department of Linguistics N408 Integrative Learning Center University of Massachusetts 650 North Pleasant Street Amherst, ma 01003 United States
Plural Type Quantification Proceedings of the Amsterdam Colloquium 1999 Yoad Winter Technion This paper introduces some of the main components of a novel type theoretical semantics for quantification with
Appendix to Chapter 3 Clitics 1 Clitics and the EPP The analysis of LOC as a clitic has two advantages: it makes it natural to assume that LOC bears a D-feature (clitics are Ds), and it provides an independent
Statistical Machine Translation Some of the content of this lecture is taken from previous lectures and presentations given by Philipp Koehn and Andy Way. Dr. Jennifer Foster National Centre for Language
Syntax 2010 DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9612.2010.00138.x Adding a Third Wh-phrase Does Not Increase the Acceptability of Object-initial Multiple-wh-questions Evelina Fedorenko and Edward Gibson Abstract. This
L1 Transfer in Processing English Subjacency Sentences from Chinese Focused Cleft WHs Fuyun Wu University of Southern California 1. Introduction In theoretical linguistics, one line of inquiry explores
Ling 130 Notes: English syntax Sophia A. Malamud March 13, 2014 1 Introduction: syntactic composition A formal language is a set of strings - finite sequences of minimal units (words/morphemes, for natural
A Parametric Account of Chinese and English Synthetic Compounds Xuhui Freddy Hu Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics University of Cambridge JeNom 5, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 21/07/2013 1
Comprendium System Overview May 2004 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION...3 2. WHAT IS MACHINE TRANSLATION?...3 3. THE COMPRENDIUM MACHINE TRANSLATION TECHNOLOGY...4 3.1 THE BEST MT TECHNOLOGY IN THE MARKET...4
CURRICULUM VITAE Whitney Tabor Department of Psychology University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269 U.S.A. (860) 486-4910 (Office) (860) 429-2729 (Home) firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~ps300vc/tabor.html
Verb Valency, Grammatical functions and Semantic roles Grammar in Expert Communication Valency deals with the question of how many participants a certain verb logically presupposes in order for the event
Bound and referential pronouns *with thanks to Birgit Bärnreuther, Christina Bergmann, Dominique Goltz, Stefan Hinterwimmer, MaikeKleemeyer, Peter König, Florian Krause, Marlene Meyer Peter Bosch Institute
Empty categories and complex sentences: the case of wh-questions. Jill de Villiers, Smith College June 1993 Second draft of chapter prepared for Paul Fletcher and Brian MacWhinney, (eds) Handbook of Child
Semantic Search in Portals using Ontologies Wallace Anacleto Pinheiro Ana Maria de C. Moura Military Institute of Engineering - IME/RJ Department of Computer Engineering - Rio de Janeiro - Brazil [awallace,anamoura]@de9.ime.eb.br
7 Summary, Discussion and Conclusions 7.1 Introduction In the past four decades, children s non-adult-like understanding of quantified sentences has been explained in syntactic, semantic or pragmatic terms
Introduction to General Linguistics WS12/13 page 1 Syntax 6 The finite verb and the clause: Course teacher: Sam Featherston Important things you will learn in this section: The head of the clause The positions