2 Missing morphology Variability in acquisition Morphology and functional structure Morphosyntax in acquisition In L1A, we observe that kids don t always provide all the morphology that adults do. At this level of description, the same thing happens in L2A L2 ers show optionality/variability in their use of verbal and nominal inflection. But what does this mean? Specifically, is this telling us about the morphology or about the underlying structures?
3 Which comes first? Variability in acquisition Morphology and functional structure Morphosyntax in acquisition There are a couple of different ideas out there about the connection between morphology and syntax in acquisition. Does learning the morphology lead to acquisition of syntax? Or does the syntax provide the things morphology needs to be learned for?
4 Morphology vs surface form Variability in acquisition Morphology and functional structure Morphosyntax in acquisition What is the relation between morphology and functional structure? (This is important if we intend to use morphological realization to diagnose functional structure.) Obviously, it s not just about the surface form. (1) A deer always eats my bagel. Deer are funny. (2) A goose alway eats my bagel. Geese are funny. (3) A wug always eats my bagel. Wugs are funny.
5 Morphology and functional structure Variability in acquisition Morphology and functional structure Morphosyntax in acquisition There is at the very least an abstract level of morphology, perhaps related to the distinctions that the surface morphology can make. Point is: regardless of the surface realization, plurals act plural, finite verbs act finite a separation between syntax and morphology. (4) I cut my bagel. I had cut my bagel. I will cut my bagel. On Tuesdays, one cuts one s bagel with a penknife. (5) I toasted my bagel. I had toasted my bagel. I will toast my bagel. On Tuesdays, one toasts one s bagel extra-dark. (6) I went to class. I had gone to class. I will go to class. On Tuesdays, one goes to class sans bagel. (7) I wrote a letter. I had written a letter. I will write a letter. On Tuesdays, one writes letters about bagels.
6 Variability in acquisition Morphology and functional structure Morphosyntax in acquisition Reminder about root infinitives in L1A We ve already seen some evidence by now from L1A for the view that the (abstract) syntax comes first: The evidence used to motivate the Small Clause hypothesis was that the overt functional words were generally missing. Yet, Poeppel & Wexler (1993) showed that in German, children will put finite verbs in second position. Abstractly, getting V2 right requires a pretty sophisticated structure, including CP. But there aren t (m)any overt Cs in the production of these children. So the conclusion would seem to be that the structure is there, but the words/morphology isn t quite.
7 Omission of morphology in L2A Variability in acquisition Morphology and functional structure Morphosyntax in acquisition Adult L2 ers also drop a lot of morphology, will produce non-finite forms... This raises the question (in the general ballpark of how much is L2A like L1A? ) as to whether second language learners show this effect as well. Rephrasing a bit, what we re talking about is essentially the structural complexity of the learner s (L1A/L2A) knowledge (at a given point).
8 It has been pretty well established by theoretical linguistics that adult native languages are quite complex, containing functional phrases like AgrP, TP, and CP, and there is a lot of support for this idea that most if not all parametric differences stem from properties of the abstract functional morphemes (often reflected in surface morphology).
9 Evidence for structure in L1A Verb movement (if it conforms to the rules of adult native-speaker verb movement, anyway) serves as evidence for this complex functional structure, since the verb moves to a functional head (T, for example). The evidence (like that just reviewed) suggests very strongly that kids learning German and French produce sentences that comply with the rules of adult syntax and thus make reference to this complex functional structure. These kids seem to know about the TP and the CP and the rules that pertain thereto.
10 Rich agreement to syntax There is a longstanding observation not really originating in the acquisition literature that languages with rich agreement morphology tend also to be the languages that allow null subjects, move the verb to T. Various attempts have been made to try to see this as an implicational relationship: The agreement paradigm determines the features in the syntax (e.g., strong features causing V to move to T). (This is a form of the morphology-before-syntax hypothesis.) This would make acquisition easier but it also doesn t seem to quite work. There are verb-raising languages without rich morphology, for one thing.
11 Syntax to morphology A different view, perhaps a bit more widely adopted, is that the syntax makes available the features and structures upon which the morphology operates. We might even think of this as an abstract tree that is first built, and then pronounced in a second step. Several studies have found that while inflection appears to be relatively poor, other things that AgrP/TP are responsible for seem to be there.
12 The responsibilities of TP/AgrP Table 6.2 from White (2003) % in obligatory suppl. overt V in contexts 3sg past be subj. nom VP Haznedar Ionin & Wexler Lardiere 1998a,b
13 : reminder, continuation Vainikka & Young-Scholten, in a series of papers, proposed the model for second language acquisition. The basic idea is that the starting point for second language syntax is a very reduced syntactic structure, which gets more complex over time. It is much like the Small Clause model in L1 acquisition beginning L2 ers have syntactic structures that consist only of a VP, and as they advance, their trees become taller. L2A takes place in stages, with grammars that successively replace each other.
14 : Initial state and transfer V&YS propose a certain kind of full transfer but limited to the VP. Since the initial grammar only generates VP, only parameters that affect the VP level are transferred from the L1. Most relevantly: headedness transfers. Other parameters (such as whether the verb raises to I) do not transfer.
15 : evidence We saw evidence of headedness transfer (VP), but the other part of the proposal is that functional categories are missing we re looking for the same sort of evidence we sought for in the Small Clause model of L1 acquisition. Things associated with missing parts of the structure should be missing (or maybe default). Working backwards, if there is no C, we should expect no complementizers (that, if) and no wh-questions. If there is no I, we should expect no modals/auxiliaries, verb raising, or subject agreement. (Perhaps this could be made more refined by considering TP and AgrP separately.)
16 VP stage: data Connections between morphology and syntax At the VP stage, V&YS find a lack of: verb raising, auxiliaries and modals, agreement, complementizers, wh-movement, questions, embedded clauses. Differentiation between VP-i and VP-ii has to do with whether the head is initial (VP-i) or final (VP-ii). (All of the auxiliaries and modals came from Rosalinda (Sp.): three wolle want and five is(t) is. She doesn t control IP yet?) stage L1 Aux Modal default agr VP Kor % VP Tur % VP-i It % VP-ii It % VP-i Sp % VP-ii Sp %
17 TP stage: data Connections between morphology and syntax A little further along, some auxiliaries and modals, Korean/Turkish speakers raise the verb about 46% of the time (but note: TP in German is head-final, yet in L2 TP stage it must be assumed to be head-initial), still a lot of default agreement. stage L1 Aux Modal default agr TP Sp % TP Tur % AgrP stage: Korean/Turkish speakers raising the verb 76% of the time, some embedded clauses with complementizers, complex wh-questions attested.
18 Minimal trees: assessment The stages are not very clean why are there any complementizers in the AgrP stage? Perhaps a better way to think about it is in terms of competition between AgrP and CP grammars, where the CP grammar initially loses most of the time, but gains power. Though, also, there are NegPs and DPs, even in the VP stage, which are functional categories. And there is evidence that, e.g., English children learning French seem to manage to raise the verb. And we need to assume that some of the CP functions can be emulated in lower phrases (wh-questions in pre-cp stages, head-initial TP in order to get V2 in pre-cp stages), though again maybe this can be answered in terms of grammar competition.
19 Minimal trees: relies on morphology Notice too that all of the evidence here is basically about whether the L2 ers provided the right morphology. So, if we assume that the morphology must be in place before the syntax gets there, then we have something like support for Minimal Trees. But that didn t seem to work too well for L1A. And it s not going to wind up working for L2A either.
20 Connections between morphology and syntax (1999, 2000) investigated the question of how other reflexes of finiteness correlate with overt morphology... Essentially: Can Poeppel & Wexler (1993)-style results be obtained by L2 ers? Like kids do during L1A, second language learners will sometimes omit, and sometimes provide, inflection (tense, subject agreement on the verb). Does lack of inflection correlate with the verb being treated as a non-finite form syntactically? Can we find evidence of functional structure in the L2 ers IL?
21 : Subjects, method examined the position of verbs with respect to negation for finite forms and non-finite forms, and looked at the proportions of verb forms that appear in places where a finite form is required vs. where a nonfinite form is required. looked at spontaneous speech data from two adults learning L2 French (from Moroccan Arabic, after a year) and two adults learning L2 German (from Spanish and Portuguese, after 3 months). Monthly interviews followed for about 2 years.
22 : Verb placement L2 French L2 German A Z A Z V-N N-V V-N N-V V-N N-V V-N N-V Finite Nonfinite Finite verbs: overwhelmingly before negation (correct). Nonfinite verbs: variable.
23 : Results Subject Oblig. Fin Oblig. Nonfin. +Fin Fin Fin +Fin A(F) Z(F) A(G) Z(G) Almost no finite (inflected) verb forms in non-finite contexts. Plenty of non-finite verb forms in finite contexts.
24 : Hypotheses Impairment Hypothesis The learners don t really (consistently) understand the inflection or how to use it. Their knowledge of inflection is impaired. Their trees don t contain the functional XPs. Missing Surface Inflection Hypothesis The learners will sometimes pronounce finite verbs in their infinitive form (the verbs act finite, the functional XPs are there, but the learner couldn t find the right inflected form in his/her lexicon in time, so s/he used the default form). The nonfinite form is essentially a default.
25 : Predictions Possibility 1 (impairment) predicts basically no correlation between verb movement and inflection. Possibility 1.5 (like L1): L2 ers go through an optional infinitive stage just like L1 ers. Predicts finite verbs act finite, infinitives act like infinitives. Possibility 2 (mispronouncing a finite verb by using its nonfinite form) predicts that: (a) when the finite form is pronounced, the verb will be (and act) finite it will move; (b) when the nonfinite form is pronounced, it might act finite or nonfinite.
26 : Conclusions s data supports the hypotheses that: (These) second language learners know the difference between finite and nonfinite verbs. They know that finite verbs move, and that nonfinite verbs do not move. The only real errors they make are essentially lexical retrieval errors (errors of pronunciation), pronouncing abstractly finite verbs as infinitives. (One question: Why the infinitive? Is it really an unmarked form universally? Does it depend on what the citation form is? Is it due to the language-particular morphology?)
27 L2A and L1A Connections between morphology and syntax One thing this tells us is that, despite possible appearances to the contrary, second language learners interlanguages are quite systematic and complex, and the L2 learners have the same kind of abstract structural knowledge incorporated into their IL that we can argue for in the case of L1 learners. We don t know really to what extent UG played a role, based only on this after all, we know that the L1 had the full structural complexity of a natural language, including the distinction (perhaps abstract) between finite and nonfinite, and including (perhaps abstract) subject agreement, etc. There s no reason that knowledge of the distinction between finite and nonfinite couldn t simply carry over ( transfer ) to the IL during L2A.
28 Morphology syntax This suggests that morphology is rather distinct from syntax. It is possible to have the syntax right and the morphology wrong. And to some extent, morphology is not provided by UG, must be learned, and moreover must be retrieved. (The view of Distributed Morphology under which morphology is a separate system given the task of pronouncing a syntactic structure (and which allows for the sort of defaults we seem to see) seems well suited to describe this.)
29 Universal principles Looking at the case-marker omission study earlier, we found some evidence that L2 ers were using the ECP (universal principle of language regulating the use of silent structures), even when not having been trained. The conclusion here is muddy: Because it is a universal principle, it may have come via transfer from the L1, or it might have come to the L2 from the same source as it came to the L1 (UG).
30 Transfer and parameter resetting: headedness We saw that there is some evidence for transfer from the L1 in particular, with respect to headedness. Early IL of L2 ers where the headedness differs from their L1 shows the L1, rather than L2 word order. This is, however, quickly repaired. So, the headedness parameter in the IL does seem to be able to be reset.
31 Transfer and parameter resetting: verb raising We also looked at White s (1991) study of French speakers in an intensive English course, and at the question of whether they acquired the verb raising parameter. The results were: (a) in order to make progress, the L2 ers seemed to need either to get negative evidence (via explicit instruction, worked best) or be flooded with positive evidence (worked less well), (b) the behavior of the L2 ers in the post-tests did not appear to work like the parameter setting was expected to (the clustering was missing), (c) most of the positive effects in either case were washed out by the intervening academic year. The conclusion here seems to be that we don t have much evidence for this parameter being resettable. So perhaps parameters differ.
32 Transitions through parameters space We also saw evidence in the use of reflexives, where languages differ on two dimensions, that L2 ers might pass through a stage that differs from both the L1 and the L2, which could be explained as a result of having reset just one of the two parameters at a certain point. Best evidence we have so far of the possibility that L2 ers proceed through a parameter space (like L1 ers are presumed to do although we ll see next week that there really has been almost no observable evidence that L1 ers have misset parameters). The results here a bit shaky insofar as one theoretical view of the typology predicts a correlation between monomorphemic anaphors and their ability to have long-distance antecedents, given that Izumi (2007) found no evidence of L2 ers treating LD anaphors as monomorphemic.
33 Morphology And, today, we ve seen (a) evidence of functional structure in the IL, (b) evidence about the relationship between functional structure and morphology. What this suggests is that morphology can lag behind syntax which isn t perhaps so surprising, since it is certain that morphology must be learned, that s not going to come from UG or from L1. This does not give us very much insight into the question of what role UG plays in L2A, since there s nothing in these results that couldn t have come from the L1 via transfer.
CAS LX 500 Topics: Language acquisition Spring 2010, January 21 2b. Root infinitives 1 Root infinitives 1.1 Properties of root infinitives Root infinities in the world Infinitive verbs are common in child
Clause Types A descriptive tangent into the types of clauses Clause = subject+predicate phrase Clause = subject+predicate phrase subject: the NP being assigned a property Clause = subject+predicate phrase
CAS LX 500 A1 Language Acquisition Week 4a. Root infinitives, null subjects and the UCC Root infinitives vs. time Here are those Danish graphs again. Ooo. Consistent. Syntax at age two Root infinitives
The optional infinitive stage and child L2 English 1 Corinne Helland & Esther Álvarez Universitat de Barcelona 1 Introduction The Optional Infinitive (OI) Stage of child L1 speech is one of the major discoveries
Chapter 13, Sections 13.1-13.2 Auxiliary Verbs What Auxiliaries Are Sometimes called helping verbs, auxiliaries are little words that come before the main verb of a sentence, including forms of be, have,
Quantificational DPs, Part 3: Covert Movement vs. Type Shifting 1 1. Introduction Thus far, we ve considered two competing analyses of sentences like those in (1). (1) Sentences Where a Quantificational
SLL 516: STRUCTURE OF MODERN RUSSIAN: MORPHOLOGY AND SYNTAX Class information: Spring 2008 Tuesday 2-4:50 GFS 204 Instructor: Prof. Roumyana Pancheva GFS 301S, by appt. firstname.lastname@example.org Class description:
A Case Study in Semantic Fieldwork: Modality in Tlingit In this handout, I ll walk you step-by-step through one small part of a semantic fieldwork project on an understudied language: Tlingit, a Na-Dene
Lecture 4 Deep Structure and Transformations Thus far, we got the impression that the base component (phrase structure rules and lexicon) of the Standard Theory of syntax generates sentences and assigns
PRODUCTION AND COMPREHENSION OF VERB AGREEMENT MORPHOLOGY IN SPANISH AND ENGLISH CHILD L2 LEARNERS: EVIDENCE FOR THE EFFECTS OF MORPHOLOGICAL STRUCTURE BY ALEXANDRA MORALES DISSERTATION Submitted in partial
The Buckingham Journal of Language and Linguistics 2013 Volume 6 pp 15-25 ABSTRACT IP PATTERNS OF MOVEMENTS IN VSO TYPOLOGY: THE CASE OF ARABIC C. Belkacemi Manchester Metropolitan University The aim of
Structure of Clauses March 9, 2004 Preview Comments on HW 6 Schedule review session Finite and non-finite clauses Constituent structure of clauses Structure of Main Clauses Discuss HW #7 Course Evals Comments
College-level L2 English Writing Competence: Mo Li Abstract Learners output of the target language has been taken into consideration a great deal over the past decade. One of the issues of L2 writing research
Some notes on Clause Structure Alan Munn 1 he head of sentence In a simple sentence such as (1a), we would normally give a tree like (1b). (1) a. he. b. S Aux However, re is a problem with this tree, assuming
Non-nominal Which-Relatives Doug Arnold, Robert D. Borsley University of Essex The properties of non-restrictive relatives All non-restrictive relative clauses include a wh-word. There are no that or zero
The acquisition of English agreement/tense morphology and copula be by L1-Chinese-speaking learners Fu-Tsai Hsieh University of York, UK Abstract This paper investigates how L1-Chinese-speaking learners
Introduction to General Linguistics WS12/13 page 1 Syntax 6 The finite verb and the clause: Course teacher: Sam Featherston Important things you will learn in this section: The head of the clause The positions
CAS L 522 Syntax I Week 3. -bar Theory Back to trees: -bar Theory Consider our current rule: : () (P+) (+) This yields a flat structure where all of components of P c-command each or. P this book P big
330 Afterword Reflecting on Interaction and English Grammar Now that you have finished this look at how interaction affects English grammar, what are the new insights that you have about how English works?
Estudios de Asia y Africa Idiomas Modernas I What you should have learnt from Face2Face 1A Question Forms 1.1 Yes-No Questions 1. If the first verb is an auxiliary verb, just move it in front of the Subject:
THE ENGLISH SENTENCE (Materials based on: Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G.K. (Eds.)., 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. London: CUP and Greenbaum, S., & Quirk, R. 1990. A Student's Grammar
University Press Scholarship Online You are looking at 1-9 of 9 items for: keywords : degrammaticalization The Rise of the To-Infinitive Bettelou Los Published in print: 2005 Published Online: September
CAS LX 52 Syntax II Spring 200 January 6, 200 Paul Hagstrom Week : Introduction, split-infl, and argumentation () CP The clause structure of the olden days (say, 986): IP CP: force (declarative, interrogative)
Syntactic error processing in bilingualism: an analysis of the Optional Infinitive stage in child language acquisition Phoebe Gaston Advisors: Maria Piñango and Bob Frank Submitted to the faculty of the
Non-finite forms of the verb Lecture 13 The verb is a grammatical class of words It denotes situations and establishes the relation between the situation reported and the extralinguistic reality. Therefore
Syntax & Morphology: A Summary (or: Everything in 12 pages) 1 Ken Ramshøj Christensen Dept. of English, Inst. for Language, Literature & Culture, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Århus http://www.hum.au.dk/engelsk/engkrc/
Phrase Structure A formal hypothesis for representing constituency Constituents are hierarchically organized TP NP VP The man eats at fancy restaurants. D N V PP the man eats P at AdjP Adj fancy NP N restaurants
The following readings have been posted to the Moodle course site: Language Files: Chapter 5 (pp. 194-198, 204-215) Language Instinct: Chapter 4 (pp. 74-99) The System Thus Far The Fundamental Question:
ENGLISH GRAMMAR UNCLOAKED 1.Why do we add an s or es to some verbs but not others? English Grammar Uncloaked Three Concepts Paramount to Understanding Grammar 1) elision; 2) underlying form; & 3) surface
Evidence for the Optional Tense Hypothesis: tense in subordinate clauses in the acquisition of English Taylor Roberts, MIT Presented at WECOL, University of California, Santa Cruz, October 1996 INTRODUCTION
Short Summary of What We ve Learned About Kikuyu In these notes, I summarize some of the main features of the Kikuyu language that we ve learned about thus far in class. Along the way I note some questions
Overview of topics What is Syntax? Word Classes What to remember and understand: Ling 201 Syntax 1 Jirka Hana April 10, 2006 Syntax, difference between syntax and semantics, open/closed class words, all
SYNTAX: THE ANALYSIS OF SENTENCE STRUCTURE OBJECTIVES the game is to say something new with old words RALPH WALDO EMERSON, Journals (1849) In this chapter, you will learn: how we categorize words how words
Grammar Guide 3/1/08 2:14 AM Page 14 14 15 Subject-Verb Agreement When we conjugate a verb in English, we change the form of the infinitive to agree with the subject. Agreement is a grammatical concept
SYNTAX Syntax the study of the system of rules and categories that underlies sentence formation. 1) Syntactic categories lexical: - words that have meaning (semantic content) - words that can be inflected
Grammar Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 Term digraph grapheme phoneme Year 1 Guidance A type of grapheme where two letters represent one phoneme. Sometimes, these two letters are not next to one another; this
Compound Sentences and Coordination Mary Westervelt Reference: Ann Hogue (2003) The Essentials of English: A Writer s Handbook. New York, Pearson Education, Inc. When two sentences are combined in a way
5th Week Ways of making a phrase, clause, and sentence 1. Ways of making Phrase Before explaining the way of making phrase, we need to understand the basic concepts in advance. Words are the most basic
Tense, Aspect and Aktionsart 1. The Semantics of Tense, Part 1: Tense Logic Overarching Question: What does tense morphology (in English) mean? What is the core semantic difference between the sentences
Advanced Conditionals Explained A conditional is made up of two parts: the if-clause and the main clause. We can put either one first and it doesn t change the meaning. We usually use a comma if we put
ISSN 1798-4769 Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 1, No. 6, pp. 926-934, November 2010 Manufactured in Finland. doi:10.4304/jltr.1.6.926-934 Drawing Tree Diagrams: Problems and Suggestions
Lecture 23-24 English 3318: Studies in English Grammar Nonfinite Verb Phrases Infinitive Phrases Dr. Svetlana Nuernberg Objectives Identify Infinitive Phrases Recognize infinitives with or without to and
Part III Syntax 1. The Noun Phrase 2. The Verb Phrase The concept of English Nouns Nouns are used to represent THINGS. In English 3 concepts are involved when we want to talk about THINGS. - Definiteness
2 What is a sentence? Morphology & Syntax Sentences Sentence as a informational-discursive unit A complete thought, generally including a topic and a comment about the topic Boys are naughtier. Boys will
Coherent infinitives in German: An experimental perspective Tanja Schmid, Markus Bader & Josef Bayer University of Konstanz, Germany email@example.com 1 Introduction Since Bech (1955/57) and
Cambridge English: Proficiency (CPE) Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Is there a wordlist for Cambridge English: Proficiency exams? No. Examinations that are at CEFR Level B2 (independent user), or above
About Collins series has been designed to be easy to use, whether by learners studying at home on their own or in a classroom with a teacher: Instructions are easy to follow Exercises are carefully arranged
Level: All Target age: Adults Summary: This is the first of a series of articles on teaching pronunciation. The article starts by explaining why it is important to teach pronunciation. It then moves on
English Syntax Syntax and its Interaction with the Interfaces Winkler WS 05-06 1 The main goal of this seminar is to bring together the core areas of linguistic research with the main aim of showing how
Morphology Morphology is the study of word formation, of the structure of words. Some observations about words and their structure: 1. some words can be divided into parts which still have meaning 2. many
Conversation Lesson News Topic: News Aims: - To develop fluency through a range of speaking activities - To introduce related vocabulary Level: Intermediate (can be adapted in either direction) Introduction
Speech and Pronunciation Instruction To Improve English Language Learners Understandability A First Literacy Professional Development Workshop Facilitators: Flory Barringham Wendy Blum Michael Feher October
Applied Psycholinguistics 29 (2008), 689 722 Printed in the United States of America doi:10.1017/s0142716408080296 The acquisition of tense in English: Distinguishing child second language from first language
Children s acquisition of relative clauses Holger Diessel Structure of relative clauses External syntax (1) The guy we saw was Peter. (2) I know the guy you are talking about. (3) Peter gave the man we
Studying the role of as in consider and regard sentences with syntactic weight and educational materials Tetsu NARITA Introduction When we say consider or regard in conversation, we either do or do not
Ling 130 Notes: English syntax Sophia A. Malamud March 13, 2014 1 Introduction: syntactic composition A formal language is a set of strings - finite sequences of minimal units (words/morphemes, for natural
An Innocent Investigation D. Joyce, Clark University January 2006 The beginning. Have you ever wondered why every number is either even or odd? I don t mean to ask if you ever wondered whether every number
Embedded clauses 1. Classifying embedded clauses We can distinguish embedded clauses on the basis of several criteria: a) their function as arguments (obligatorily required by the verb) or not: embedded
Steps to Proving a Theorem Step 1: Understand Goal What am I looking for? What should the last sentence in my proof say? What are some equivalent ways to state what I want? Are there any complicated definitions
ENGLISH GRAMMAR 1 VP; MOOD Greenbaum and Quirk, 1990: pp. 34-44 Blaganje and Konte, 1998: pp. 198 217; 213-217 Types of verbs Full / lexical: carry te lexical meaning (work, sleep, know,...) and are open
TKT Module 1: Describing language: Grammar Teacher s Notes Description Participants will discover what is covered by the TKT Module 1 Part 1 syllabus area relating concepts and terminology for describing
MODULARITY What s a module? Fodor: hardwired (not assembled from more primitive processes) of fixed neural architecture (specified genetically) domain-specific (a module computes a constrained class of
Moulton's Audiolingual slogans 1. A language is speech, not writing. 2. A language is a set of habits. 3. Teach the language, not about the language. 4. A language is what native speakers say, not what
Verbs The verb is a key element in an English clause or sentence, since it handles most of the grammatical workload in a sentence. Verbs can be varied to show tense and form. Although some simple tense
Co-Lang 2014 Pedagogical Grammars Day 1, Monday: What is a pedagogical grammar? Who is the audience? This course will look at pedagogical grammars or teaching grammars in the broadest sense. A. Background
1 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION A. Background of the Study Language is used to communicate with other people. People need to study how to use language especially foreign language. Language can be study in linguistic
Trinity Certificate in TESOL Trinity TESOL Study Resource no 7: Teaching Grammar in Context When we teach grammar, we not only help our learners to express themselves, but we also fulfil their expectations
NAP Narrative Assessment Protocol Laura M Justice Khara Pence Ryan Bowles Carolyn Gosse C Gosse NAP Elicitation Directions 1. Introduce the task: Show the cover of the book to the child. Say: We are going
Skills 360 9 Hacks for Improving your Business English (Part 1) iscussion Questions 1. What do you usually say to someone if you don t understand what they are saying? 2. What special words do you usually
Present continuous tense For actions happening now. When we want to talk about an action that is happening now or at this time (and is unfinished), we use the present continuous tense. We also use this
7. The structure of VP We have already at various points given indications about the structure of VP, notably in section 5.4. But there are still many outstanding questions, for example about the functions
BBC Learning English Business Language To Go Part 1 - Interviews This programme was first broadcast in 2001. This is not a word for word transcript of the programme This series is all about chunks of language
CS 6740/INFO 6300 Spring 2010 Lecture 17 April 15 Lecturer: Prof Lillian Lee Scribes: Jerzy Hausknecht & Kent Sutherland Using & Augmenting Context-Free Grammars for Sequential Structure 1 Motivation for
Courses Description ELI 600 Second Language Acquisition 3 This course introduces the students to the major theories and issues in second language acquisition, as well as the theories and assumptions that
Syntactic Theory Background and Transformational Grammar Dr. Dan Flickinger & PD Dr. Valia Kordoni Department of Computational Linguistics Saarland University October 28, 2011 Early work on grammar There
Linguistics 5301: Principles of Linguistic Analysis Fall 10 Professor: Nicholas Sobin Office & hours: LART 113; 2-3 p.m. M-R, & by appt. Formal class meetings: 4:30-5:50 p.m. M Open tutorials: 4:30-5:30
Sentence Focus Activity Sentence Blocks Contents Instructions 2.1 Activity Template (Blank) 2.7 Sentence Blocks Q & A 2.8 Sentence Blocks Six Great Tips for Students 2.9 Designed specifically for the Talk
MSc Introduction to Syntax Lecture 3: Predicates and arguments 1. Semantic predicates and arguments In the previous lectures we have seen that sentences have an internal structure and we discussed some
Simulating Optional Infinitive Errors in Child Speech through the Omission of Sentence-Internal Elements Daniel Freudenthal (D.Freudenthal@Liverpool.Ac.Uk) Julian Pine (Julian.Pine@Liverpool.Ac.Uk) School
Linear Programming Notes VII Sensitivity Analysis 1 Introduction When you use a mathematical model to describe reality you must make approximations. The world is more complicated than the kinds of optimization
Movement and Binding Gereon Müller Institut für Linguistik Universität Leipzig SoSe 2008 www.uni-leipzig.de/ muellerg Gereon Müller (Institut für Linguistik) Constraints in Syntax 4 SoSe 2008 1 / 35 Principles
Syntax II, Handout #4 Universität Stuttgart, SOSES 2006 Winfried Lechner Wed 14.00-15.30, Room 11.71 VERB CLASSES 1. CONTROL VS. RAISING VERBS The distinction between raising and control verbs is not always
Bound and Referential Pronouns and Ellipsis Heim and Kratzer Chapter 9 1 9.1 Referential pronouns as free variables 2 9.1.1 Deictic versus anaphoric, referential versus bound-variable pronouns In traditional
Brochure More information from http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/2853521/ Contrasting English and German Grammar: An Introduction to Syntax and Semantics Description: This book offers an introduction
Language and Mind HONR 218L Recap: entences have structure In speaking and writing we string words together linearly (we have no choice) But in our minds, we represent sentences as hierarchical structures
Pronunciation Audio Course PART 4: The Most Challenging Consonant Sounds -TRANSCRIPT- Copyright 2011 Hansen Communication Lab, Pte. Ltd. www.englishpronunciationcourse.com Pronunciation Audio Course Part
A Parametric Account of Chinese and English Synthetic Compounds Xuhui Freddy Hu Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics University of Cambridge JeNom 5, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 21/07/2013 1
H National Quali cations EXEMPLAR PAPER ONLY EP42/H/02 Mark Spanish Directed Writing FOR OFFICIAL USE Date Not applicable Duration 1 hour and 40 minutes *EP42H02* Fill in these boxes and read what is printed
Modals review Make predictions about your partner s week, career or life, indicating how sure you are about your prediction each time. Do they agree with you? What forms did you use above to talk about
Title: The Root Infinitive Stage in Afrikaans: Evidence for Phonologically Neutralized Rich Agreement Running Head: The RI-Stage in Afrikaans: Evidence for Null AGR 1 Abstract: Corpus data available on
Grammar for 6 11 year olds Singular and plural General questions Indefinite article Simple present Present continuous The time Do..Does ( Plus verb ) Saxon genitive Adjectives Possessive adjectives Can