ARL. Laboratory Overview ARCTIC SOF CAPABILITIES WORKSHOP. Penn State. Presented to: Presented by: Mr. Tom Goodall 20 November 2014



Similar documents
Applied Research Laboratory: Visualization, Information and Imaging Programs

Emerging Threats and Challenges for Homeland Air Security

The State of DoD Biometrics

Specialist Meeting IST-131: Distributed Data Analytics. Description / Purpose

Virginia National Guard. The Commonwealth s Guardian

Business Industry Day

G2 Industry Day JULY Mr. Stephen Kreider PEO IEW&S. G2 Industry Day 29 July 2015 CLEARED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE

DISA Testing Services for the Enterprise. Luanne Overstreet

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #139

Application of Technology to Create an Integrated, Multidisciplinary Approach to Safe and Secure Ports

Issue Paper. Wargaming Homeland Security and Army Reserve Component Issues. By Professor Michael Pasquarett

U.S. DoD Physical Security Market

Encl: (1) Surface Warfare Tactical Requirement Group Membership

CAREER OPPORTUNITIES

Homeland Security Education: The Current State. The Naval Postgraduate School, Center for Homeland Defense and Security

Simulation and Training Solutions

Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Atlantic

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #50

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #159

Insider s Guide to Careers in Intelligence Analysis. hosted by Tom Hunter, MA, M.Litt. (Former DIA Senior Intelligence Analyst)

Promoting Rapid Tech Insertion and the Importance of Domestic and International Collaboration

National Security Workforce: Issues and DoD Strategies. Department of Education Science Summit Briefing

H. R. ll IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES A BILL

Army Research Laboratory Technical Strategy

COMBATSS-21 Scalable combat management system for the world s navies

How To Help The War On Terror

FEDERAL CLOUD COMPUTING SUMMIT

Dr. Starnes E. Walker Founding Director, Cybersecurity Initiative (302)

NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN SECURITY

Software Reprogramming Policy for Electronic Warfare and Target Sensing Systems

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO


ANSER and AMERICAN MILITARY UNIVERSITY. Homeland Security Education

Dr. Raju Namburu Computational Sciences Campaign U.S. Army Research Laboratory. The Nation s Premier Laboratory for Land Forces UNCLASSIFIED

In December 2011, the White House Office of Science. Introducing the federal cybersecurity R&D strategic plan. Leaping ahead on cybersecurity

Cyber Situational Awareness - Big Data Solution

THE DIGITAL AGE THE DEFINITIVE CYBERSECURITY GUIDE FOR DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

Panel on Emerging Cyber Security Technologies. Robert F. Brammer, Ph.D., VP and CTO. Northrop Grumman Information Systems.

ELBIT SYSTEMS. Jefferies Global Industrials Conference - August Joseph Gaspar EVP & CFO

The Challenge. Shipboard crew members need training because cadres are not expected to provide a long-term ConOps for UUV employment.

STATEMENT BY DAVID DEVRIES PRINCIPAL DEPUTY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER BEFORE THE

Information Fusion (Hard and Soft) For Intelligence, Surveillance & Reconnaisance (ISR) Joint Symposium IST-106 and SET-189

Earn a Bachelor or Master of Science Degree (BS/MS) in Intelligence Management at Henley-Putnam, a Leader in Intelligence Studies Education

HOMELAND SECURITY INTERNET SOURCES

Report to Congress on The Role of the Department of Defense in Supporting Homeland Security. September 2003

The Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative

Modeling and Simulation (M&S) for Homeland Security

Systems Engineering and Integration Efforts. 11 Dec 2013

AF C2 Capability Modernization Leveraging Architectures to Achieve Warfighting Integration

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

The USNA Cyber Program

ABE40. Welcome Transportation Partners

Statement by Mr. Stephen Welby. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. Before the

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

SatCom For Net-Centric Warfare July/August MilsatMagazine

GAO HOMELAND DEFENSE. U.S. Northern Command Has a Strong Exercise Program, but Involvement of Interagency Partners and States Can Be Improved

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

TechNet Land Forces South Small Business Opportunities. Carey Webster Director, Federal Information Solutions Deltek

Information Briefing and Reception. Chris Van Metre President, SCRA Applied R&D December 4, 2014

CyberSecurity Solutions. Delivering

NIST Cybersecurity Initiatives. ARC World Industry Forum 2014

CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 15.C Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Proposal Submission Instructions

Flooding Emergency Response Exercise

Rapid Prototyping: Leapfrogging into Military Utility

Navy Information Dominance Industry Day

NICE and Framework Overview

Director of Intelligence Proposed Research Topics

DoD Mobility Kim Rice

Georgia Tech Research Institute. Translational Research Model for Creating Solutions through Innovation

Solicitation Number: RFI-JIFX_Special_Interest_Request_For_Information Notice Type: Special Notice

PATRIOTWATCHTM PATRIOTSHIELDTM PATRIOTSWORDTM

Coast Guard Top Acquisition Priorities and the Interoperability Imperative

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Visualization and Analytics Centers

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY CH I EF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Measurement and Signature Intelligence (MASINT)

National Special Security Events

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

The Pennsylvania State University. Executive Director Defense Related Research Units. Search. and Applied Research Laboratory

United States Government Accountability Office GAO. Report to Congressional Committees

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Forces in Iraq. JoAnne O Bryant and Michael Waterhouse Information Research Specialists Knowledge Services Group

Dept of Homeland Security Office for Domestic Preparedness

Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General. DHS' Role in State and Local Fusion Centers Is Evolving

Surveillance and Security Systems

Symposium on the Interagency Strategic Plan for Big Data: Focus on R&D

Introduction to NICE Cybersecurity Workforce Framework

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #35

Visualization, Modeling and Predictive Analysis of Internet Attacks. Thermopylae Sciences + Technology, LLC

Department of Defense Project Manager Mobile Electric Power (PM MEP)

OVERVIEW OF THE ADMINISTRATION S FY 2005 REQUEST FOR HOMELAND SECURITY By Steven M. Kosiak

GAO DEFENSE DEPARTMENT CYBER EFFORTS. More Detailed Guidance Needed to Ensure Military Services Develop Appropriate Cyberspace Capabilities

Welcome to the 2007 DHS University Network Summit. Matthew Clark, Director Office of University Programs DHS Science and Technology Directorate

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE N / Directed Energy and Electric Weapon System. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Espionage and Intelligence. Debra A. Miller, Book Editor

HOMELAND DEFENSE AND SECURITY GRADUATE EDUCATION

DHS Science & Technology Directorate Overview

December 14, Sincerely, Charles T. Follin, PMP President. Page 1 of 5

Cyber Security Awareness Workshop

Transcription:

ARL Penn State Laboratory Overview Presented to: ARCTIC SOF CAPABILITIES WORKSHOP Presented by: Mr. Tom Goodall 20 November 2014

ARL Penn State University-Affiliated Research Center (UARC) As a DoD designated University-Affiliated Research Center (UARC) ARL Penn State maintains a special long-term strategic relationship with DoD. Characteristics of this relationship include: Responsive to evolving needs Comprehensive knowledge of needs and problems Access to information and proprietary data Corporate knowledge and technical memory Objectivity and independence from commercial interests Quick response capability Current operational experience Freedom from real and perceived conflicts of interest UARC: 10 USC 2304 (c)(3)(b) to establish or maintain an essential engineering, research, or development capability to be provided by an educational or a federally funded research and development center and are designed UARC by the Director, Defense Research and Engineering (DDR&E).

ARL Penn State Penn State University Research - Multidisciplinary Centers Research Expenditures: $806M (UFY 2011) 2 nd in nation for DoD Research Relevant Multidisciplinary Centers Applied Research Laboratory (www.arl.psu.edu) Institute for CyberScience (www.ics.psu.edu) Center for Cyber Security, Information Privacy, and Trust (cybersecurity.ist.psu.edu) Network Security Research Center (nsrc.cse.psu.edu) Institute for Non Lethal Defense Technologies International Center for the Study of Terrorism (www.icst.psu.edu) Strengths Interdisciplinary Research Materials nano-scale, electronics, coatings Energy- fuels, batteries, alternatives Engineering all disciplines incl. nuclear Medicine cancer treatment, heart devices 96,000 students (10,000 graduate students) Recent Recognition Center for Academic Excellence Strategic Global Security Scholars Program (ODNI) Center of Excellence for Information Assurance Education (NSA) Center of Excellence for Information Assurance Research (DHS)

ARL Penn State Facilities and Locations Naval Underwater Warfare Center, Keyport, Wa. Penn State Electro-Optics S&T Center Freeport, Pa. ARL Penn State State College, Pa. APPLIED RESEARCH LABORATORY BUILDING Distributed Engineering Center Penn State Fayette Campus APPLIED SCIENCE BUILDING Navigation Research & Development Center Warminster, Pa. Washington Office Washington, DC GARFIELD THOMAS WATER TUNNEL ARL Tampa Tampa, Fl. Joint Interagency Task Force, South Key West, Fl. ARL SCIENCE PARK ARL WEST I ARL WEST III NAVIGATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

ARL Penn State Applied Research Laboratory - Classified Program Capabilities Existing infrastructure supports classified research and non-attributable contracting Cleared Contracting and Support staff Security staff has experience administering all types of programs Approximately 1,200 Faculty and Staff Engineers Over 900 cleared Secret or higher Over 180 cleared Top Secret and/or SCI Secure Areas APPLIED RESEARCH LABORATORY BUILDING APPLIED SCIENCE BUILDING ARL SCIENCE PARK Existing Classified Networks at Penn State ARL RESTON FACILITY

ARL Penn State Applied Research Laboratory - Relevant Areas of Expertise System Architectures Advanced Communications Cyber Operations Image Processing and Analysis Advanced Visualization Data Analysis & Exploitation ISR Technologies Modeling & Simulation Systems Engineering / Cost Reduction Direction Finding and Geolocation Sensor Technologies Unmanned Systems

ARL Penn State Rapid Development/Fielding for DoD Deep Social Network Analysis (twitter/blog/other) Advanced Visualization Activity Based Intelligence Forecasting Covert/Clandestine Communications Offensive Cyber / Network Operations Covert Detection / Defeat Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance Antennas and Electromagnetic Design Condition Based Maintenance and Logistics DARPA Adaptive Vehicle Make Exemplar Programs Quality and Innovation Delivering innovative and reliable research and development in a timely and cost effective manner

Thunderstorm Program Overview 20 November 2014 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Mr. Tom Goodall, Principal Investigator & Mr. Mike LoQuasto, Demonstration Director Applied Research Laboratory/Penn State University

Introduction Thunderstorm facilitates a collaborative working relationship between Government, academia, and industry. This promotes the identification and assessment of emerging and mature technologies with the primary goal of accelerating the delivery of technology discoveries to government partners. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 2

Methodology & Venues Strategic Steering Guidance based on overarching objectives of the Assistance Secretary of Defense (Research and Engineering) and Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Emerging Capability and Prototyping) FY15 focus area is on Countering WMD, Unmanned Autonomous Systems, Countering Emerging Threats and Electromagnetic Spectrum Agility. Analytical Gaming Workshop Think Tank Forum for SME s to develop future Thunderstorm Concepts Creates a joint working group environment to share technologies and ideas Forum for analyzing new and emerging threats Tabletop Experiment (TTX) Scenarios are used to focus on process, procedures and potential capabilities SMEs attend from various DoD agencies and operational partners from across the government Capability gaps are selected and prioritized in order to be considered for technology demonstrations Technology Field Demonstrations Platform for pairing technologies with potential customers Minimal cost to vendor, attractive to startup companies with minimum financial backing Uses operational environment to assess prototype technology capabilities with operational partners being readily available for feedback FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 3

Thunderstorm Intent Current Guidance Focus on DOD s Ability to Deter, Predict, and Interdict Threats Deter - Influence target audiences through quickly understanding local environments and populations and leveraging key influence nodes Predict - Demonstrate the capability to predict threats using Big Data and other non traditional sources and the fusion/pairing of these sources Interdict Exploit sensor capabilities to develop actionable intelligence and cue appropriate response actions Deter/Predict Detect Thunderstorm Application Spectrum Interdict Focus on Emerging/Asymmetrical Threats and Environments to enhance Warfighting Architectures and Interagency Collaboration Best match Key Operational/Supporting Partnerships, Venues and Technologies within Thunderstorm based on Strategic Intent and the Operational Plans. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 4

Benefits the Operational Partners Collaboration for addressing operational environment challenges Opportunity to brainstorm and war-game in a controlled setting Venue to observe new and emerging technologies in the AOR Opportunity to pair technologies for improving effectiveness FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 5

Benefits the Demonstrators Realistic technology deployment Ability to demonstrate low TRL technologies End user interaction Constructive feedback Insight to operational environment challenges Opportunity to interact and collaborate with other demonstration technologies FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 6

Previous Thunderstorm Spirals Summary & Results Spiral / Individual Demos Focus Location Successful Follow-On Results FY-09 Spiral 2 1 Field Demonstration 10 FY-10 Spiral 3 1 Field Demonstration 10 FY-11 Spiral 4 1 Field Demonstration 4 FY-12 Spiral 5 1 Field Demonstration 6 Maritime Domain Awareness Maritime Domain Awareness Border Security Border Security Key West, FL; US SOUTHCOM AOR Key West, FL; US SOUTHCOM AOR Southern AZ; CBP, Tucson Sector Southern TX; CBP, RGV Sector 7 (4 Transitioned to Operational Use, 3 Improved Tactics, Techniques & Procedures (TTP)) 5 (3 Transitioned to Operational Use, 1 Improved TTP, 1 Follow-on R&D Activity) 1 Improved TTP 4 (1 Transitioned to Operational Use, 1 Improved TTP, 2 Follow-on Demonstration) Thunderstorm Program reorganized in FY-13 to refocus from tactical to operational level demonstrations. Needs and capability gaps are now identified prior to the solicitation of technology. FY-13 Spirals 13-1,2 2 Field Demonstrations 29 Border Security Southern TX; CBP, RGV Sector 17 (8 Transitioned to Operational Use, 4 Improved TTP, 1 Follow-on R&D Activity; 4 Follow-on Demonstration) FY-14 Spirals 14-1,2,3,3a 1 Analytical Panel 1 Tabletop Experiment 2 Field Demonstrations 36 Chem/Bio WMD via Maritime Pathways Reston, VA; USCG Base, Key West, FL; and Edgewood, MD 12 To Date (4 Improved TTP, 4 Follow-on R&D Activity, 4 Follow-on Demonstration) FY-15 Spirals 15-1,2,3,4,5 1 Analytical Panel 2 Tabletop Experiment 2 Field Demonstrations -Arctic Threats -Chem/Bio WMD via UAS deployed -EW Threats FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 7

Focus Areas: Objectives Counter Chemical/Biological Weapons of Mass Destruction (C/B WMD) threats transiting the Arctic pathway Counter C/B WMD threats using a UAS platform; Using a UAS, detect a C/B WMD threat Anti-Personnel Land Mine-Alternatives Identify potential challenges and gaps in processes, procedures, and partnerships and explore emerging technologies, technical applications, and their potential to detect, predict, interdict, and deter- or otherwise counterthe three focus threat areas Move the end game further from the U.S. border and move the timeline to the left Individual Capability/Technology Demonstrations: TBD Results and Follow-On Status: TBD Spiral Events: Thunderstorm Spiral 15 Summary Spiral 15-1 Tabletop Experiment (Countering C/B WMD transiting the Arctic pathway): Apr 2015 timeframe Spiral 15-2 Tabletop Experiment (Ottawa Treaty Compliant (OTC)): May 2015 timeframe Spiral 15-3 Field Demonstration (Countering C/B WMD using UAS Platform): 17-27 Feb 2015 Spiral 15-4 Chamber Demonstration (Extreme Cold): 22-26 Jun 2015 Spiral 15-5 Field Demonstration (OTC): Aug 2015 timeframe Operational Partner Organizations: NORTHCOM, SOCNORTH, SOUTHCOM, SOCOM, EUCOM, STRATCOM, TRANSCOM, USN, USA Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL), USAF, USCG, DTRA, Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical & Biological Defense (JPEO-CBD), JIATF-S, Intelligence Community (ONI, NRO, NGA, DIA, etc.), National Guard Bureau (NGB), National Guard States (MS & NH), FBI, and CBP Demonstration Team: ARL/PSU (Demonstration Lead) and GTRI FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 8

Questions? FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 9

BACKUPS FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 10

Thunderstorm Process Chart Plan Thunderstorm Technology Events OSD Determines Operational Partners (OPs) OSD & OPs Select Capabilities Gaps for Demonstration Focus OSD & OPs Select Demonstration Locations ARL/PSU Submits Demonstration Plan / Budget OSD Approves Plan/ Budget Yes Start Detailed Planning Process No Solicit Technology Demonstrators Attend Technology Conferences Attend DoD & OPs Conferences Visit Prospective Demonstrators Corporate Headquarters Select Demonstrators Selected Select / Lock In Demonstrators Provide Demonstrators Mission Scenarios Conduct Site Visit w/demonstrators Process FAA Requests Process Frequency Requests Conduct Demonstration Location Coordination Conduct Site Visits Determine Logistical Requirements Receive input for Scripted Scenarios Non Selected Place in Contact List for Future Demonstrations Develop Program Plan Develop Scenarios Conduct Risk & Safety Assessment Develop Demonstration Plans Develop Scripted Vignettes Assign Technologies to Vignettes Process Land Use Requests Execute Events Execute Spiral Demonstrations Receive & Secure Equipment Shipments Conduct Set-Up Week Conduct Demonstration Week Pack-Up and Ship- Out Equipment Analyze Demonstration Data and Results Prepare Spiral Demonstration Final Report FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 11

Thunderstorm Spiral 15 Focus Area 1 - Arctic Region Spirals Focus Area: Countering Chemical/Biological Weapons of Mass Destruction (C/B WMD) threats transiting the Arctic pathway Demonstration Site: New Hampshire National Guard Extreme Cold Chamber Demo Demonstration Team: RRTO, ARL/PSU (Demonstration Lead), GTRI and Noetic Group Spiral Event Location Dates Lead Asst 15-1a TTX (Action Officer Level) SOCNORTH, CO 18-20 Nov 2014 PSU 15-1b TTX (Senior Level) SOCNORTH, CO Apr 2015 timeframe PSU 15-4 Extreme Cold Chamber Demo CRREL, NH 22-26 Jun 2015 PSU GTRI COCOM Operational Partners: NORTHCOM, SOCNORTH, EUCOM, SOCOM, STRATCOM and TRANSCOM Service Operational Partners: USN, Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL), USAF, USCG, National Guard Bureau (NGB), Alaska National Guard (AKNG) and New Hampshire National Guard (NHNG) Other Operational Partners: DTRA, Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical & Biological Defense (JPEO-CBD), Joint Inter Agency Task Force South (JIATF-S), Intelligence Community (ONI, DIA, etc.) and DHS CBP. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 12

Thunderstorm Spiral 15 Focus Area 2 - Countering a C/B WMD UAS Spiral Focus Area: Countering Chemical/Biological Weapons of Mass Destruction (C/B WMD) threat using a UAS platform and Employing Chemical and Biological Sensors on a UAS Demonstration Site: Mississippi National Guard Camp Shelby Demonstration Team: RRTO, ARL/PSU (Demonstration Lead), GTRI and Noetic Group Spiral Event Location Dates Lead Asst 15-3 Field Demonstration Camp Shelby, MS 17-27 Feb 2015 PSU GTRI COCOM Operational Partners: NORTHCOM, SOUTHCOM, SOCNORTH and SOCOM Service Operational Partners: USA RDECOM, USAF, USN, USCG, National Guard Bureau (NGB) and Mississippi National Guard (MSNG) Other Operational Partners: DTRA, Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical & Biological Defense (JPEO-CBD), JIATF-S, Intelligence Community (ONI, DIA, etc.), and FBI FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 13

Thunderstorm Spiral 15 Focus Area 3 Ottawa Treaty Compliant Spirals Focus Area: Addressing Ottawa Treaty compliant technologies Demonstration Team: RRTO, ARL/PSU (Demonstration Lead) and GTRI Spiral Event Location Dates Lead Asst 15-2 TTX (Senior level) Washington, DC area May 2015 (new date) PSU GTRI 15-5 Field Demonstration TBD Aug 2015 PSU GTRI COCOM Operational Partners: TBD Service Operational Partners: USA and TBD Spiral details and additional participants are still being finalized FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 14