REPORT TO REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY COMMISSION MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2013 LEECH WATER SUPPLY AREA RESTORATION UPDATE



Similar documents
Angora Fire Restoration Activities June 24, Presented by: Judy Clot Forest Health Enhancement Program

Post-Wildfire Clean-Up and Response in Houston Toad Habitat Best Management Practices

Waldo Canyon Fire. Mark Shea Watershed Planning Supervisor August 23, 2012

ANGORA FIRE RESTORATION PROJECT

King Fire Restoration Project, Eldorado National Forest, Placer and El Dorado Counties, Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

Revising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan

Avison Management Services Ltd. COMPANY PROFILE

WORKSHOP SUMMARY REPORT 1

Background research on the topic of urban forestry is intended to

Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank

JOB DESCRIPTION. GS-11 $46,006 - $59,801 Annual/Full Benefits GS-12 $55,138 - $71,679 Annual/Full Benefits

Oregon. Climate Change Adaptation Framework

LFA FORESTRY, FIRE, AND STATE LANDS I SSUE BRIEF UTAH STATE LEGISLATURE 2015 GENERAL SESSION. Summary

Colorado Natural Heritage Program

Healthy Forests Resilient Water Supply Vibrant Economy. Ecological Restoration Institute

REPUBLIC OF TURKEY MINISTRY OF FORESTRY AND WATER AFFAIRS

18 voting members 44 stakeholders 114 list. Senators: Wyden & Merkley Representative DeFazio

PART I DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT STATE OF HAWAII Class Specifications for the

Guidelines for Professional Services in. the Forest Sector Forest Roads

FORESTED VEGETATION. forests by restoring forests at lower. Prevent invasive plants from establishing after disturbances

Repair of Fences Damaged by Bushfire and Fire Control Line Rehabilitation Policy

Lower Crooked Creek Watershed Conservation Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Project Theory-Climate Change and Traditional Ecological Knowledge Adaption in the Klamath Basin

Your Defensible Space Slideshow

Developing a Prescribed Fire Burn Plan: ELEMENTS & CONSIDERATIONS

Adopted 9/23/98 CHATTAHOOCHEE CORRIDOR PLAN. The goals of the Chattahoochee Corridor Plan (hereinafter also referred to as the Plan ) are:

Wildfires pose an on-going. Integrating LiDAR with Wildfire Risk Analysis for Electric Utilities. By Jason Amadori & David Buckley

STATEMENT OF RON HUNTSINGER NATIONAL SCIENCE COORDINATOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT U.S

NEW DENVER / SILVERTON FIRE PROTECTION AREA COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN PART 2

How To Know If A Forest Service And Bmd Plan Postfire Rehabilitation And Restoration

6. NATURAL AREAS FIRE MANAGEMENT

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

Prattsville Berm Removal Project. 1.0 Project Location

The correct answers are given below. Some talking points have been added for the teachers use.

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Plan

2009 Station Fire. Past. Present. Future. Successes and Challenges in Postfire Recovery

720 Contour Grading. General. References. Resources. Definitions

GLOSSARY OF TERMS CHAPTER 11 WORD DEFINITION SOURCE. Leopold

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

Flood Protection & control works

Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment

EFB / Online Wetland Restoration Techniques Class Syllabus

HFQLG Project Evaluation Form

Appendix J Online Questionnaire

Passive Restoration 101: Framework and Techniques Overview. Amy Chadwick, Great West Engineering August 26, 2015 Butte, America

Wausau and Marathon County Parks, Recreation, and Forestry Department Forestry Division 2015 Work Plan

Past and Current Research on Natural Resource Issues in the Blue Mountains

Nevada Pinyon-Juniper Partnership Proposed Demonstration Area A Brief Introduction. Presented by Jeremy Drew Project Manager Resource Concepts, Inc.

The National Wildfire Mitigation Programs Database: State, County, and Local Efforts to Reduce Wildfire Risk 1

Mountainous forest watershed management Governance in Greece

Using an All lands Framework for Conservation of Ecosystem Services

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

Hearing Order OH File No. OF- Fac- Oil- N

Fire, Forest History, and Ecological Restoration of Ponderosa Pine Forests at Mount Rushmore, South Dakota

Addendum D. Nomination of Moody Wash ACEC

THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

Fuels Treatments Reduce Wildfire Suppression Cost Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge May 2012

SEC PURPOSE. SEC DEFINITIONS. SEC COLLABORATIVE FOREST LANDSCAPE RESTORATION PROGRAM.

MULTI-AGENCY COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN CHECKLIST 1

Table 2: State Agency Recommendations Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets

The Resilience of Nature. Mount St. Helens Eruption and Recovery

Ouachita River Floodplain Restoration Upper Ouachita NWR, Louisiana

RESTORATION & REVITALIZATION

Habitat Management Techniques Flatwoods Salamander. USFWS Recommendations

City of London Climate Change Adaptation Strategy Dealing with Extreme Rainfall Events

LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN

My friends and neighbors refer to the cabin as the Miracle Cabin because it has survived two wildfires.

Roaring Fork Valley Restoration Strategy

Hayman Restoration Partnership

FOREST SERVICE HANDBOOK NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

Flooding Fast Facts. flooding), seismic events (tsunami) or large landslides (sometime also called tsunami).

Arizona s Large Fires Suppression vs. Restoration. WESTCAS Fall 2011 Meeting Bruce Hallin Manager, Water Rights and Contracts October 27, 2011

Wildfire & Flash Flood Recovery NACo Justice & Public Safety Symposium January 2014

STAFF REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

2015 AVAGO 2D SEISMIC SURVEY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN SUMMARY

Karuk Tribe Integrating Traditional Ecological Knowledge within Natural Resource Management

INFORMATION BULLETIN BUSINESS FLOOD PLANNING AND MITIGATION GUIDE ACE GLOBAL RISK ENGINEERING. Flood risk assessment. Introduction

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION B, ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES. April 20, 2010 EXHIBIT 1

Angeles National Forest Fiscal Year 2012

Fiskville Training College

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STORMWATER FIELD INSPECTION REPORT - ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION

FOREST RESTORATION MONITORING TOOL

King County Flood Hazard Management Plan Update Cedar/ Sammamish Rivers. Public Meeting December 5, 2012

Wildfire & Flash Flood Recovery Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP) Flood Mitigation Efforts April Fall 2013

FLOOD PROTECTION AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN. May Prepared by. for the by Earth Economics

Response Levels and Wildland Fire Decision Support System Content Outline

Blue Creek Fire Natural Resources Recovery Guide

Henry Van Offelen Natural Resource Scientist MN Center for Environmental Advocacy

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

Forest Watershed Tree Thinning Restoration Effectiveness Monitoring in the Manzano Mountains of New Mexico

A Developer s Guide: Watershed-Wise Development

Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon Creek Watershed. Summary Report 2002

PIPELINE ROUTING PERMIT. For A NATURAL GAS PIPELINE DAKOTA AND RAMSEY COUNTIES ISSUED TO NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY D/B/A XCEL ENERGY

The State of the Sierra Nevada s Forests

Arapaho & Roosevelt National Forests 2013 Flood: Long-term Recovery in a Changed Landscape

Utah State General Records Retention Schedule SCHEDULE 1 GEOSPATIAL DATA SETS

A Self Assessment to Address Climate Change Readiness in Your Community Midwest Region

Post-Flood Assessment

Transcription:

Making a difference... together Agenda Item #9 REPORT #RWSC 2013-17 REPORT TO REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY COMMISSION MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2013 SUBJECT LEECH WATER SUPPLY AREA RESTORATION UPDATE Provide an update on the restoration activities and priorities for the Leech Water Supply Area (WSA) and implications on capital and operating budgets. BACKGROUND The Leech River watershed lands were acquired to control the use and management of the catchment area that will provide the future drinking water supply for the Greater Victoria Drinking Water System. The land acquisition was made in two phases: 8,791 ha in 2007 and 837 ha in 2010. At the time of purchase, the Leech WSA was approximately 95% logged and contained an extensive road network of more than 400 km. In 2009, a consultant's report provided recommended restoration priorities for the Leech WSA. These recommendations were presented to the Regional Water Supply Commission and long term capital ($5. 756 M) and operating budgets to 2025 were established to fund the restoration activities (REPORT RWSC 2009-05). REPORT Since 2009, a substantial amount of work on the restoration of the Leech WSA has been completed. These accomplishments are listed below. Nevertheless, there is still much to do over the next decade or so. The priorities for the next few years are also listed below. 1. ROADS Completed 2009-2012 (Capital Expenditure: $825,700) Mapping of roads and stream networks Assessment of major roads and planning of main access routes Assessment of stream crossings and drainage structures on accessible roads Review of design flow criteria and required modifications to accommodate increased precipitation and the effects of climate change Road and stream crossing density analysis Removal of a failing bridge on Jarvis Main Upgrade of Survey Mountain Main Grading and basic road maintenance on main access routes Piling and removal of cables, old culverts and other scrap metal Note: Annual maintenance of the road network is funded through operating funds. Priorities 2013-2016 (Capital Requirement: $1,252,500) Replacement of two bridges and a number of culverts on main access routes Rerouting of three sections of main access routes, two on a floodplain and one in very high terrain stability hazard with slope failures Construction of access to Little Healy Mountain to support video surveillance and weather station infrastructure Removal of a large condemned bridge spanning the West Leech River Construction of an alternate route to Weeks Lake to allow the rehabilitation of a section of road with high and very high terrain stability concerns Prioritization and planning of measures to correct surface drainage and erosion problems Prioritization and planning of the large network of roads to be rehabilitated

2 2. SLOPE STABILITY AND SOIL EROSION CONTROL Completed 2009-2012 (Capital Expenditure: $306,500) Classification and mapping of geology Classification and mapping of terrain, terrain stability and soil erosion potential LiDAR derived terrain, contour and canopy height mapping Identification of an alternate route to Weeks Lake to allow the rehabilitation of a section of road with high and very high terrain stability concerns Rehabilitation prescriptions for several spur roads on unstable terrain Priorities 2013-2016 (Capital Requirement: $489,200) Rehabilitation of spur roads on unstable terrain Assessments, prescriptions, and cost estimates for road rehabilitation needed in all high and very high terrain stability class areas Deactivation of approximately 15 kilometres of roads on unstable terrain Sediment source surveys and analysis to help prioritize rehabilitation efforts 3. REFORESTATION AND FOREST HEALTH Completed 2009-2012 (Capital Expenditure: $302,900) Integration of forest cover and ecosystem mapping received from private forest companies into CRD corporate data Update of forest cover mapping and information Planting of 137,186 tree seedlings- Douglas fir, western red cedar, white pine Stocking surveys conducted where reforestation success uncertain White pine blister rust surveys Annual aerial surveys of forest health since 2009 Brushing of bracken fern for tree release Priorities 2013-2016 (Capital Requirement: $67,000) Forest health assessment of areas of chlorotic (yellow-tinged) regenerating Douglas fir Pruning of white pine in priority areas to reduce their susceptibility to blister rust Brushing treatments to ensure tree release from competing vegetation Determine frequency and needs for stand tending Establish measures to assess hydrologic/ecosystem recovery for ongoing reporting 4. WILDFIRE PROTECTION AND FOREST FUEL MANAGEMENT Completed 2009-2012 (Capital Expenditure: $220,800) Piling and burning of remaining logging slash to reduce wildfire hazard One fire weather station established in the southern Leech (Martin's Gulch) Establishment of a CRD communications facility on Survey Mountain Daily ground patrols during fire season Installation and updating of wildfire danger class information signs at Leech WSA entrances Air patrol coverage during high and extreme fire danger Identification and development of water pumping stations and fire vantage points Modelling of water pumping limits to depict areas of difficult fire suppression Removal of the derelict cabin at Jarvis Lake Note: Some items funded by operating or other capital accounts

3 Priorities 2013-2016 (Capital Requirement: $ 0) Additional fire weather station in the northern portion of the Leech watershed Revised wildfire management plan incorporating management of the Leech watershed Identification of helicopter landing locations for air based fire management Continuation of patrols, maintenance of pumping stations, vantage points, fire hazard awareness 5. SECURITY Note: To be funded from operating and fire weather station capital Completed 2009-2012 (Capital Expenditure: $ 0) Security assessment and report for the GVWSA including Leech Maintenance of existing security gate at Weeks Lake Installation of 5 security gates and supporting fencing, lockblocks or barriers concentrated at the southern Leech boundary closest to Sooke Dam Barriers to vehicles driving right to the edge of Weeks Lake Posting of signage identifying CRD property, no hunting, no fires Outreach with the public in the area of Weeks and Jarvis Lakes during ground patrols Posting a notice in BC Hunting Regulations- Leech is closed to hunting Note: Completed works funded from annual fence/gate capital and operating Priorities 2013-2016 (Capital Requirement: $ 0) Strategy/actions to limit placer/mineral mining exploration and development Incorporate Leech WSA into the Greater Victoria Water Supply Area Protection Bylaw 2804 Define and implement the phased approach to a closed watershed for the Leech WSA Additional boundary marking, signage, gates and fencing to help define the Leech WSA as held and managed by the CRD. Address areas of trespass in the Leech WSA Note: Funded from annual fence/gate capital and operating. 6. WILDLIFE AND INVASIVE PLANTS Completed 2009-2012 and Ongoing (Capital Expenditure: $ 0) Beaver detection and control Bullfrog detection, no control required so far Monitoring of wildlife species Brushing of roadside scotch broom Wetland surveys to assess drainage patterns, plant and animal classification and habitat potential for undesirable species (beaver, bullfrog and invasive plants) Note: Funded by operating. Priorities 2013-2016 (Capital Requirement:$ 0) Canada goose monitoring at Jarvis and Weeks Lake Fish habitat and presence surveys Wetland mapping Note: Funded by operating

4 7. WATER QUALITY Completed 2009-2012 and Ongoing (Capital Expenditure:$ 0) Monitoring Leech River water quality including nutrients and physical-chemical parameters. Leech River water flow monitoring Note: Funded by operating. Priorities 2013-2016 (Capital Requirement:$ 0) Increase monitoring intensity and locations 8. FIRST NATIONS INTERESTS Completed 2009-2012 and Ongoing (Capital expenditure: $ 0) T'Sou-ke capacity building and skills training Note. Funded by reforestation capital and operating Priorities 2013-2016 (Capital Requirement: $40,000) Cultural assessment of the Leech watershed in consultation with T'Sou-ke and other First Nations Working with T'Sou-ke Nation, continue to assist with capacity building and environmental restoration skills and knowledge PROGRESS ON PRIORITIES IDENTIFIED IN 2009 The following table provides a summary of the capital funding by restoration priority type. The future focus of Leech restoration will address slope stability issues and required road upgrades and deactivation requirements along with the completion of a cultural assessment to assist with integrating the interests of First Nations in the management of the Leech WSA. Table 1. Leech Restoration Capital Expenditures and Forecast Needs by Priority Type. Priority Type Expenditure Forecast Need Comment 2009-2012 2013-2016 Roads $828,700 $1,252,500 Slope Stability and Soil Erosion $306,500 $489,200 Control Reforestation and Forest $302,900 $67,000 Health Wildfire Protection and Forest $220,800 $0 To be funded from Fuel Management operating Security $0 $0 Other capital and operating Wildlife and Invasive Plants $0 $0 Funded from operating Water Quality $0 $0 Funded from operating First Nations Interests $0 $40,000 TOTAL $1,658,900 $1,848,700 To get a better sense of the scale of expenditures and needs, the data in this table is shown in graphical form on the next page.

5 2009-2012 Expenditures ($1,658,900) Leech Restoration Capital Fuel Mgmnt 13% $220,800 Roads 50% $828,700 Reforestation 18 % $302,900 Slope Stability 19 % $306,500 Figure 1. Expenditures by Priority Type- Leech Restoration Capital Funds 2013-2016 Forecast Need ($1,848,700) Leech Restoration Capital Interests 2% $40,000 Reforestation 4% $67,000 Slope Stability 26% $489,200 Roads 68% $1,252,500 Figure 2. Forecast Need by Priority Type - Leech Restoration Capital Funds

6 Completing planned road and bridge upgrades and addressing slope stability issues in the Leech WSA is critical in 2013-2016. Failing bridges limit access to suppress wildfire and manage security issues. Roads with drainage concerns on unstable slopes pose a risk of landslides that could cause significant damage to Leech River water quality, associated fish habitat and could require a significant investment to stabilize after failure. Key vacant positions in Watershed Protection were filled in 2013 providing the resources to plan and supervise restoration projects. Carry forward and planned capital funds should provide sufficient funding to complete the high priority projects. Operating funds have been held at the 2010 level and proposed increases have not occurred as originally planned. However, the need for increased operating funds to manage and maintain the Leech WSA is inevitable because the completion of new capital works will translate into new maintenance requirements. Staff are currently reassessing requirements and schedules and will present recommendations in the next 3 year budget cycle. CONCLUSION Restoration of the Leech Water Supply Area is progressing. Immediate fuel management, reforestation and road access issues have been addressed. High priority road, bridge and slope stability projects are underway and planned for 2013-2016. RECOMMENDATION(S) That the Regional Water Supply Committee receive the staff report for information. Arfriette ConstabeT,RPF,PMP Senior Manager, Watershed Protection AC:mm