Fukushima & Three Mile Island Reactor Accidents: Recovery, Cleanup, Lessons, & Future



Similar documents
Boiling Water Reactor Systems

Public SUMMARY OF EU STRESS TEST FOR LOVIISA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

May 23, 2011 Tokyo Electric Power Company

IAEA INTERNATIONAL FACT FINDING EXPERT MISSION OF THE NUCLEAR ACCIDENT FOLLOWING THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI

Special Report on the Nuclear Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station

The integrity evaluation of the reactor building at unit4 in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station

Three Mile Island Unit 2 Overview and Management Issues

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION (EPFAQ) NEI REVISIONS 4 THROUGH 6; NUMARC/NESP 007

Belgian Stress tests specifications Applicable to all nuclear plants, excluding power reactors 22 June 2011

IV. Occurrence and Progress of Accidents in Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations and Other Facilities

How To Clean Up A Reactor Water Cleanup

Introduction to Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Advanced Nuclear Fuels

( 1 ) Overview of Safety Measures ( 2 ) Overview of Measures for Attaining Greater Safety and Reliability

Belgian Stress tests specifications Applicable to power reactors 17 May 2011

February 19, Senior Fellow, Nuclear Energy Systems & Services Division Power Systems Company

INTRODUCTION. Three Mile Island Unit 2

10 Nuclear Power Reactors Figure 10.1

Roadmap towards Restoration from the Accident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, TEPCO. Progress Status

IAEA INTERNATIONAL FACT FINDING EXPERT MISSION OF THE FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI NPP ACCIDENT FOLLOWING THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI

Nuclear power plant systems, structures and components and their safety classification. 1 General 3. 2 Safety classes 3. 3 Classification criteria 3

Fukushima Nuclear Disaster

TOPIC: KNOWLEDGE: K1.01 [3.3/3.5] Which one of the following contains indications of cavitation in an operating centrifugal pump?

HOW DOES A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT WORK?

Operational Reactor Safety /22.903

July 30, 2012 Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters Government-TEPCO Med-and-long Term Response Council

AP1000 Overview Westinghouse Electric Company LLC - All Rights Reserved

BWR Description Jacopo Buongiorno Associate Professor of Nuclear Science and Engineering

SAFETY EVALUATION OF INDIAN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS. BWRs AT TARAPUR ATOMIC POWER STATION (TAPS-1&2)

Fukushima Fukushima Daiichi accident. Nuclear fission. Distribution of energy. Fission product distribution. Nuclear fuel

The Price-Anderson Act and the Three Mile Island Accident

Fukushima Daiichi Accident Study (Status as of April 2012)

Three Myths of the Three Mile Island Accident

Contractor s Guide Outage O3 2015

THREE MILE ISLAND ACCIDENT

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON MODERN VVER GEN III TECHNOLOGY. Mikhail Maltsev Head of Department JSC Atomenergoproekt

Overview of the Multi-nuclide Removal Equipment (ALPS) at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. March 29, 2013 Tokyo Electric Power Company

Generating Current Electricity: Complete the following summary table for each way that electrical energy is generated. Pros:

(2) Action taken at the main control rooms a. General

APPENDIX C. Accident Cleanup

Physics and Engineering of the EPR

Results and Insights of Internal Fire and Internal Flood Analyses of the Surry Unit 1 Nuclear Power Plant during Mid-Loop Operations*

SECTION 8 Industrial Facilities Field Investigation

Report. November 2013

12.5: Generating Current Electricity pg. 518

Dynamic Behavior of BWR

What s It All About? The Sun as a Power Source Instructor Guide

This document is the property of and contains Proprietary Information owned by Westinghouse Electric Company LLC and/or its subcontractors and

15 April 2015 Nuclear Regulation Authority, Japan. 1. Overview

U.S. EPR Design Overview

C. starting positive displacement pumps with the discharge valve closed.

Operating Performance: Accident Management: Severe Accident Management Programs for Nuclear Reactors REGDOC-2.3.2

AT&T Internet Data Center Site Specification San Diego Koll (San Diego, CA)

CFD Topics at the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Christopher Boyd, Ghani Zigh Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research June 2008

SOLVING REACTOR WATER CLEAN-UP SYSTEM ANOMALIES USING RELAP5 MOD3.3

Source Term Determination Methods of the Slovenian Nuclear Safety Administration Emergency Response Team

NUCLEARINSTALLATIONSAFETYTRAININGSUPPORTGROUP DISCLAIMER

THE REPORT ON THE INVESTIGATION OF THE REACTORS AT FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI NUCLEAR POWER STATION (NO. 1)

Government Degree on the Safety of Nuclear Power Plants 717/2013

V K Raina. Reactor Group, BARC

Application of Nuclear and Aerospace Industry Experience to Offshore Barrier Integrity Management

Resilience improvements to UK nuclear power plants

APPENDIX CC NUCLEAR WASTE STORAGE

Boiling Water Reactor Power Plant

FIELD TRIP TO A POWER PLANT - A Reading Guide

SAFETY STANDARDS. of the. Nuclear Safety Standards Commission (KTA) KTA Residual Heat Removal Systems of Light Water Reactors.

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION WASHINGTON, DC June 16, 2011

AT&T Internet Data Center Site Specification - Phoenix Area (Mesa, AZ)

Holtec International. Multi-Purpose Canisters for Long-Term Interim Storage. June 17, Rick Springman, Ph.D. Director of International Projects

Do-Now. 1.) Get out notebook.

Status on Spanish Regulations and Industry. actions related to Filtered Containment. Venting Systems (FCVS)

APPENDIX O. Spill Prevention and Emergency Response Plan. G3 Terminal Vancouver Port Metro Vancouver Project Permit Application APPENDIX O

This occurrence is considered to be of no significance with respect to the health and safety of the public.

nuclear energy facts

How To Handle A Bdbb At A Nuclear Plant

Diablo Canyon NPP Probabilistic Risk Assessment Program. Workshop Information IAEA Workshop

Preventing Ice Dams on Roofs

INSTRUCTION MANUAL. Boil-Out TABLE OF CONTENTS SAFETY WARNINGS 2-3 RESPONSIBILITY 3 INTRODUCTION 3 PRE-BOIL OUT PROCEDURES 3-5 BOIL OUT PROCESS 5-9

GEH Safety Enhancement Services

Nuclear Waste A Guide to Understanding Where We've Been and Where We're Going

AT&T Internet Data Center Site Specification Chicago Area (Lisle, IL)

Olkiluoto 3 Basic Facts

Explosion of a gasoline vapour cloud formed in a hydrocarbon loaded effluents storage tank 10 December 1999 Arquata Scrivia Italy

Critical Review of the Swedish Stress Tests Report

11. Radioactive Waste Management AP1000 Design Control Document

Fission fragments or daughters that have a substantial neutron absorption cross section and are not fissionable are called...

NUCLEAR POWER PLANT SYSTEMS and OPERATION

Transcription:

Fukushima & Three Mile Island Reactor Accidents: Recovery, Cleanup, Lessons, & Future Foundation For Nuclear Studies Congressional Briefing May 18, 2012 Lake H. Barrett Lake@Lbarrett.com Disclaimer: Fukushima Information is preliminary especially regarding interpretation of events; opinions expressed are mine and mine alone. Most Photos Courtesy of TEPCO 1

Energy & Human Societal Evolution Mankind Huts to Modern Cities Energy Simple Fire to Fossil Electricity to Nuclear Electricity Energy Density Diffuse/Intermittent to Concentrated/Continuous 2

Constant Evolutionary Societal Benefit/Risk Tradeoffs No Energy Source is Free From Risk or Cost Oil Rig Fire Gas Pipeline Explosion Wind Mill Collapse Coal Mine Accident Coal Ash Dam Break Hydro Power Floods 2000 Killed 1963 Solar Panel Roof Falls 3

Nuclear Power Plant High Density Energy Reactor Core Boils Water 4

Three Mile Island Units 1 &2 March 28, 1979 5

Three Mile Island Unit 2 Accident March 28, 1979 Relief Valve fails to close PORV Operators Believe Reactor Overfilled and Turn Off Injection Pumps Core is uncovered Fuel overheats/fails/~50% Melt 650,000 gallons of highly radioactive water collects L. Barrett Consulting 6 LLC

TMI Core Damage Sequence 7

Three Mile Island March 28, 1979 Hydrogen Deflagration 28psig 13:00 ~3M deep water 1000R/hr 8

Offsite Releases Variable & Confused Readings 3/28 30 9

Public Confusion Due To Lack of Information & Distrust Company Not Believed Government Distrusted But NRC Single Spokesman Denton Made Progress 10

TMI Precautionary Evacuation Minimal Releases But Great Uncertainty Then Mostly Noble Gases, Minor Iodine (<15Ci), No detectable Cs release Maximum Dose <<1msv, ave ~10 μsv (<1mr) over 2M Advisory Evacuation for Pregnant Women & Children on 3/30/79 ~140,000 People Left for Less than a Week Cost $71M Paid by Owner Insurance 11

PA Evacuation Sites 12

President Carter Arrives April 1 President Carter In Control Room Carter, Denton & PA Governor Thornburg 13

Initial Plant Stabilization Core Cooling Established: 6 Hours Cold (<100C) Passive Shutdown:1 Month All Accident Water Retained Pre accident Water Processed and Released to Make Room For Accident Water Accident Water Never Released to River Airborne Iodine Releases From Auxiliary Building Mitigated 14

Recovery Cleanup Actions Building Remediation to Gain Core Access (Barrett Entry) Phased Unique Air and Water Cleanup Systems Created Based on Best Available Technology 15

TMI Damaged Core Removal ~1985 1990 16

TMI Defueling Sequence Core Bore Machine Defuel Can Loading Can Transfers Shipping Cask Transport Core Debris Storage 17

TMI Unit 1 Restarted Restarted September 18, 1985 Six and Half Year Process Extensive Operator Training Plant Modifications Extensive Public Regulatory Hearing Process One of Best Operating Reactors Today in US 18

Three Mile Island History Reactor Scram: 04:00 3/28/79 Core melt and relocation: ~ 05:00 07:30 3/28/79 Hydrogen Deflagration: 13:00 3/28/79 Recirculation Cooling: Late 3/28/79 Phased Water Processing: 1979 1993:Removed ~1.2MCi Cs137 Containment Venting 43KCi Kr 85: July 1980 Containment Entry: July 1980 Reactor Head removed and core melt found: July 1984 Start Defuel: October 1985 Shipping Spent Fuel: 1988 1990 Finish Defuel: Jan 1990 Evaporate ~10 M Liters Processed Water: 1991 93 Cost: ~$1 Billion (YOE) 19

Peace On The River Most Painful Experiences Are the Most Teachable We Learned & We Changed 1978 2008 Most Stress is Gone- All are Wiser Nuclear Power is Safer Nuclear Power is More Productive 20

Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Units 5 &6 Common Spent Fuel Pool Dry SNF Storage Units 1 4 21

Event Initiation March 11, 2011 About 14:46, a 9.0 magnitude earthquake struck (Plant design basis earthquake: 8.2) Plant safety systems reportedly function satisfactorily. Units 1,2 & 3 Scram & Unit 4 has 100 day old core offloaded into Unit 4 Spent Fuel Pool Subduction Fault ~ 15:45, Seven tsunami waves up to 14 meters high inundated the site, whose design basis was 5.7 meters the reactors and backup diesel power sit roughly 10 to 13 meters above sea level The tsunami & earthquake impacts up and down the northeast coast resulted in tragic loss of 20,000+ lives, damage, and destruction of infrastructure. L. Barrett Numark Assoc 22

No Known Seismic Safety Damage Despite Huge Earthquake, Seismic Loads Close to Design Safety Systems Appeared Functional 23

Tsunami Waves 24

Incoming Wave Behind Reactor Building 15:42 25

Wave Behind Reactor Building 15:43:26 26

Wave Behind Reactor Building 15:43:54 27

Wave Behind Reactor Building 15:44:58 28

Wave Behind Reactor Building 15:47 Tank Top 15M 29

30

Tsunami Size: Main Safety Factor 3/11 15:45 31

GE Mark I Reactor Building Boiling Water Reactor Design At Fukushima Daiichi Secondary Containment Refueling Floor Spent Fuel Pool Steel Containment Vessel Reactor Vessel Primary Containment Suppression Pool (Torus) 32

Browns Ferry Primary Containment 33

Post Tsunami U 1 4 Conditions No AC Power (~15:45) No Unit 1 & 2 DC & Partial Unit 3 DC Power No Control room Lighting (flashlights) Salt Water Flooded EDGs & Switchgear Salt Water Destroyed Service Water Pumps & Switchgear Unit 1 Isolation Condenser Valve Problems Spotty Instrumentation Readings L. Barrett Numark Assoc 34

Battery Power Control of Steam Driven Reactor Core Isolation Cooling System In Units 2 &3 (Unit 1 Had Isolation Condenser which Operators Stopped) Unit 1 Isolation Condenser CST? Slide 35 3/11 15:45 to ~ 3/11 24:00 JST

Actions to Extend DC Power For Control Scavenged Truck Batteries To Maintain Reactor Instrumentation Control Room Operator During Black Out 36

Battery Power Exhausted Core Uncovers and starts to overheat Suppression pool (wet well) becomes saturated 3/12 ~02:00 JST Slide 37

Venting Primary Containment Filter H2 & Steam H2 & Steam? Refueling Bay Core Overheated Primary Containment Pressure~ ~90psia @02:00 3/12 H2 & Steam Uncertain Command & Control Actions & Unit 1 Vent Valve Operability 3/12 ~05:30 U1 3/13 ~ 00:00 U2 3/13 ~ 08:40 U3 38

Hydrogen Leakage Paths Dry Head Seals Hatch Seals Electrical Penetrations 39

Unit 1 Reactor Building Explosion 3/12 15:31 40

Unit 3 Reactor Building Explosion 3/14 11:15 41

Unit 1 Reactor Building 42

Unit 3 Reactor Building Before After 43

Fukushima: Reactor Vessel Primary Secondary Containment Sequence Primary Coolant System Primary Containment Secondary Containment Core Over Heats Clad Burst ~900C Clad Oxidize ~1200C H2 Release Partial Melt~1800C 2700C Primary Coolant System Overpressure Vent from Primary Coolant Sys to Primary Containment H2, Steam, & Fission Products (Xe, Kr, I, Cs etc) No Primary Containment Cooling therefore Primary Containment Overpressure Vent to Secondary Containment 44

Cores Melted, Slumped Into Lower Head& Likely Failed Some CRD Penetrations Unit 1 RPV Failed Grossly and Units 2&3 Partially Original Core Melted Core dropped RPV Thermal Failures Core on Floor Unit 1 Melt: 3/11~19:00 RPV Fails ~3/12 ~15:00 Unit 2 Melt: 3/14 ~20:00 Unit 3 Melt: 3/13 ~09:00 45

Unit 2 & 3 Core Melt Mostly Retained In Vessel? Longer Core Cooling With Turbine Driven Pumps Resulted in Less Aggressive Core Melting Projected Vessel Breach with some Melted core on the floor Minor Concrete Penetration (if any) due to low Melted Core Mass and Flooded Drywell Floor U 2 Water Level is 60cm deep with Very High Gamma Levels (~7000R/hr or 70Sv/hr) Likely exposed Melted Fuel 3/12 46

Unit 1 Core Melt to the Floor Loss of Isolation Condenser Cooling: Early Core Melt & Significant Vessel Penetration & Likely Core Drop Unit 1 Corium Penetrated ~70cm (30%) of the 260cm thick floor concrete Above the 4cm steel liner plate. There is 7M of base mat concrete below the liner plate 7M Thick 47

Core Cooling Established With Fire Truck Sea Water Injection 48

Bleed & Feed Core Cooling Established Seawater Injection Started Using Fire Engine Pump Shift to Fresh Water Injection: To Dissolve Possible Salt Cakes Vapor Venting Water Core Injection Seawater Fresh Rate Rate (1/12) (gpm) (gpm tpd) U1 3/12 20:20 3/25 20 36 156 U3 3/13 13:10 3/25 50 87 240 U2 3/14 16:30 3/26 30 78 216 Tank Condensation/Water Leakage to Reactor Building Turbine Bldg Intake Structure Boric Acid 49

Immediately After Unit 3 Explosion 3/14/11 ~10:00AM JST 50

Spent Fuel Pool in Reactor Building Unit 4 Pool ~350,000 Gal U4:1331 Assemblies SF ~100 day old U3:514 Assy SF~ 200 Days old U2: 587 Assy SF ~120 Days Old 51

Unit 4 Reactor Building 52

Unit 4 Spent Fuel Pool Water Sampling Boom Inserting Probe ~11 04 11 400ml Sample Probe ~11 04 11 53

Unit 4 Spent Fuel Pool Sampling Indicates Little If Any Fuel Damage Low Cesium Levels in 90Bq/ml Water Level Lowered For Seismic Safety 54

Unit 4 Explosion: H2 From Unit 3 Unit 4 Unit 3 55

Dry Storage Cask Facility overhead travelling crane cask trolley storage cask transport vehicle air inlet Relative Low Elevation 56

Storage Only Metal Cask Body: γ-ray shield (carbon steel) outer shell primary lid neutron shield (boron-added resin) bottom plate secondary lid cask frame basket (borated-aluminum alloy) Main features Cylindrical forged carbon-steel casks Similarity with transport casks 5-115T 52 Assy Casks & 4-96T 37 Assy Casks Helium filled Steel for γ-ray shield/ resin for neutron shield 57 Borated-aluminum alloy basket for sub-criticality

Dry Storage Facility Was Flooded But All 9 Casks Intact 58

Fukushima Stabilized Established Recirculation Core Cooling Damaged Pressure Vessel(s) & Containments Mitigating Airborne Releases Mitigating Water Releases Gaining Building Access to Start Recovery Activities Managing Solid Wastes Maintain Personnel Safety: High Rad Areas Addressing Evacuation Zone Situation 59

Units 1 4 After U4 Building Explosion 3/16 60

Unit 4 Fuel Pool Side 61

Unit 3 & Unit 4 62

Water Spray to Unit 3 Pool Area 63

Unit 4 Reactor Building Water Injection Boom To Spent Fuel Pool 64

Release Periods Based On Site Gamma Levels usv/h @Gate @ 1Km U2 Internal Explosion? U3 White Smoke? U4 Building Explosion? U3 Gray Smoke? U1 Explosion? 65