Policy & Management Applications of Blue Carbon. fact SHEET



Similar documents
Using the Carbon Market to Provide Financial Support for Coastal Restoration and Protection. fact SHEET

Wetlands and Climate Change: Considerations for Wetland Program Managers

A Model to Help You Determine Your

Ecosystem Services in the Greater Houston Region. A case study analysis and recommendations for policy initiatives

Office of Climate Change, Energy Efficiency and Emissions Trading. Business Plan

Long Term Challenges for Tidal Estuaries

Restoring Ecosystems. Ecosystem Restoration Services

NATURAL RESOURCE RESTORATION LESSON PLAN Fix It!

GREAT BARRIER REEF. Climate Change Action Plan

Calculating Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Using the voluntary carbon market to provide funding for natural capital projects in the UK. 6 th October 2015

This fact sheet provides an overview of options for managing solid

A Guide to Woodland Carbon for Business

Future of our coasts: Potential for natural and hybrid infrastructure to enhance ecosystem and community resilience Ariana Sutton-Grier

RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAGOONS

Indonesian Government Blue Carbon Priorities. Tonny Wagey

Energy: renewable sources of energy. Renewable Energy Sources

Ecosystem services in grasslands: evidence, trade-offs and restoration. James Bullock NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology

Creating Green Jobs within the Environment and Culture sector.

Forest carbon sequestration and climate change. Dr Brian Tobin University College Dublin

IFC Definitions and Metrics for Climate-Related Activities

Coastal Management Definitions

Fisheries and Aquaculture in our Changing Climate

Forest-Climate Working Group:

COMMUNITY CERTIFICATIONS

CLIMATE ACTION IN BRITISH COLUMBIA 2014 PROGRESS REPORT

Carbon Credits: An Opportunity for Forest Landowners. Hughes Simpson Texas Forest Service

Aquatic Biomes, Continued

Michigan Wetlands. Department of Environmental Quality

In 2013, the Spanish economy emits million tonnes of greenhouse effect gases, 7.8% less than in 2012

WONDERFUL, WATERFUL WETLANDS

4.2 Buena Vista Creek Watershed

Ecological Restoration of a Brackish Marsh at Parcel 11, Estate Carolina, St. John

Economic Benefits from Aquatic Ecological Restoration Projects in Massachusetts Summary of Three Phases of Investigation

Ariana Sutton-Grier, Holly Bamford & Kateryna Wowk University of Maryland and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Clifton Bain IUCN UK Peatland Programme

Mitigating Climate Change through Restoration and Management of Coastal Wetlands and Near-shore Marine Ecosystems

Finding Ways to Postpone Climate Tipping Points Using Updated Metrics

CARBON THROUGH THE SEASONS

PRACTICAL STRATEGIES FOR IMMEDIATE PROGRESS ON CLIMATE CHANGE BUILDING BLOCKS FOR A GLOBAL AGREEMENT

The Everglades & Northern Estuaries; St. Lucie River Estuary, Indian River Lagoon & Caloosahatchee Estuary. Water Flows & Current Issues

Implementation of the New York City Wastewater Resiliency Plan: Opportunities And Lessons Learned

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES

Pajaro River Watershed Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Update Project Solicitation Form

SUPPORTING FACTSHEET

Environmental Compliance Questionnaire for National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Financial Assistance Applicants

How To Adapt To Climate Change In The Bahamas

SUBMISSION BY THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES

Emerging BioFuel Crops and Technology Kurt Thelen Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan ABSTRACT

Strategic framework for setting priorities for restoring degraded ecosystems in Germany

Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank

Amherst County Public Schools. AP Environmental Science Curriculum Pacing Guide. College Board AP Environmental Science Site

NEW BRUNSWICK DEPARTMENT OF SUPPLY AND SERVICES EEL RIVER DAM REMOVAL/ DECOMMISSIONING PROJECT

12.5: Generating Current Electricity pg. 518

The Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia under the UNFCCC

The California Environmental Protection Agency works to restore, protect,

Ecosystems and Food Webs

WATER: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE Syllabus

Methane Emissions and Colorado Coal Mines

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2012 SCORING GUIDELINES

Carbon Sequestration Update on National and Western State Activities. November 2007

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY CANTON, NEW YORK COURSE OUTLINE ESCI INTRODUCTION TO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE

Water Management in the Netherlands

The Role of Offsets in a Greenhouse Gas Emissions Cap-and-Trade Program: Potential Benefits and Concerns

About IUCN.

LIFE ORIENTATION DOCUMENT

Recognizing Wetlands. For additional information contact your local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers office. Pitcher plant.

Best Practices for Including Carbon Sinks in Greenhouse Gas Inventories

Connecting Science and Management for Virginia s Tidal Wetlands. In this issue...

AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE

Introduction to Natural Resource Damage Assessment

Global Peatland Fund Presentation UNFCC Climate Conference

Subsidence Mitigation Through Rice Cultivation Research Project Goals:

DECISION DOCUMENT NATIONWIDE PERMIT 27

Generating Current Electricity: Complete the following summary table for each way that electrical energy is generated. Pros:

Adapting Northern Adelaide - Submission towards the new Climate Change Strategy for South Australia

Snapshots: Resilient Lands and Waters Initiative

APPENDIX K COASTAL RESOURCES

SLOW ONSET EVENTS. climate change impacts on BIODIVERSITY

Communicating Your Commitment: Your Guide to Clean Energy Messaging

Pamela Birak, Jordan Lake State Park, Chatham County, NC

Greenhouse Gas Offsets and Renewable Energy Certificates: Distinct Commodities in an Evolving Market The Climate Trust

CCR Biology - Chapter 13 Practice Test - Summer 2012

Statement of Richard F. Delaney Director, Urban Harbors Institute University of Massachusetts Boston

CONNECTING BIODIVERSITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION 1

Integrated Restoration Prioritization

RELEASED. Spring 2013 North Carolina Measures of Student Learning: NC s Common Exams Earth/Environmental Science

Phosphorus and Sulfur

Mer Bleue Wetland Management Plan: Executive Summary National Capital Commission National Capital Greenbelt Elgin Street Ottawa, Ontario K1P

Briefing Paper on Lower Galveston Bay and Bayou Watersheds Lower Bay I: Armand Bayou to Moses Lake and Adjacent Bay Waters

Regulatory Features of All Coastal and Inland Ecological Restoration Limited Projects

Photo by Jeff Thibodeau, Helios Land Design

It s hard to avoid the word green these days.

GULF COAST VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT: AN APPROACH TO ASSESS KEY DRIVERS OF ECOLOGICAL CHANGE IN GULF OF MEXICO ECOSYSTEMS AND SPECIES

San Francisco Bay Margin Conservation Decision Support System (DSS)

Integrated Global Carbon Observations. Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University

Climate Change. Lauma M. Jurkevics - DWR, Southern Region Senior Environmental Scientist

Background for marketing carbon from forest growth in the US. B.S. Folegatti and M.F. Smidt

Connecting Coastal Waters: Restoring Coastal Wetland Hydrology

NAPA COUNTY WATERSHED SYMPOSIUM

Transcription:

Policy & Management Applications of Blue Carbon fact SHEET

Policy & Management Applications of Blue Carbon Coastal Blue Carbon - An Important Wetland Ecosystem Service Coastal Blue Carbon refers to the carbon stored in coastal ecosystems, including salt marshes, mangroves, seagrasses and other tidal wetlands. Blue carbon is a newly recognized ecosystem service and as such can provide a new incentive to prioritize the restoration and conservation of these coastal ecosystems. Maintaining ecosystem services is critical to supporting coastal ecologies and communities. Recognizing the value of blue carbon provides an additional important component to help meet the challenges of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions but also supports climate change adaptation and protection of coastal communities. The Science of Coastal Blue Carbon There are three GHGs that are cycled through wetlands: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O). To help assess management options that may have GHG benefits, the following summary of emissions, potential emission reductions, and atmospheric removals, is provided: Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ) Tidal marshes, mangroves and seagrasses extract CO2 from the atmosphere and store carbon within plant biomass. Over time this carbon is transferred to the soil carbon pool, and plant material, particularly root material, decays in situ. Coastal wetlands continuously sequester carbon in soils as wetlands build with sea level rise, burying old soil beneath new. Carbon sequestration benefits accrue when a functioning wetland habitat is conserved and maintained, when a former or degraded wetland is restored, and when a wetland is created where none existed prior to creation. Conditions that are favorable to carbon sequestration are a functional wetland with native plants and appropriate hydrology and sediment conditions. The long term sequestration of carbon within wetland soils has resulted in enormous stocks of carbon building up beneath coastal wetlands (Pendleton et al., 2012). Wetland soils are rich in carbon compared to other ecosystem types. If undisturbed, these stocks will remain buried. Drainage of wetlands results in a rapid emission of CO2 Sequestration Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is taken in by trees and plants during the process of photosynthesis. Storage Dead leaves, branches, and roots containing carbon are buried in the soil, which is frequently, if not always, covered with tidal waters. This oxygen-poor environment causes very slow break down of the plant materials, resulting in significant carbon storage. Some carbon is lost back to the atmosphere through respiration, The rest is stored in the leaves, branches, and roots of the plants. Source: NOAA Habitat Conservation through oxidation (Crooks et al., 2011, Pendleton et al., 2012). Climate mitigation benefits occur when wetlands at risk of drainage or disturbance are protected. And restoring hydrology to a drained wetland that is emitting CO2 can reduce emissions as well. Methane (CH4) Low salinity wetlands naturally produce CH4, a GHG with a global warming potential 34 times greater than CO2. CH4 emissions are insignificant where water salinity is greater than half that of ocean waters (35 parts per thousand), as salinity inhibits methane production. Barriers in coastal areas, such as road construction, often result in impaired drainage behind, causing degradation of wetlands and increasing CH4 emissions. Removing barriers could potentially be one of the more significant opportunities on a per area basis for reducing GHG emissions in coastal areas. Nitrous Oxide (N2O) N2O has a global warming impact 310 times that of CO2. It is derived as a byproduct of human released nitrogen into the environment. Occasionally wet soils, such as agricultural lands, are significant sources, while soils which are permanently wet, as found in many coastal wetlands, are minimal sources. Reducing nitrogen pollution directly reduces N2O emissions as well as indirectly as improving water quality aids the recovery of seagrass which extract nitrogen from the water column.

Using Coastal Blue Carbon to Reduce GHG Emissions There are a number of key coastal wetland management activities that can reduce or reverse GHG emissions from coastal systems by preserving blue carbon. Protect existing coastal wetlands. Coastal wetlands hold stocks of carbon that may have accumulated over thousands of years. Storage occurs because the soils are wet, an unfavorable condition for decomposition of organic material. Once drained and exposed to oxygen these stocks are rapidly released back to the atmosphere as CO2 within a matter of years or decades. Protecting wetlands and maintaining moist soil conditions prevents this release. On drained soils improved water management and rewetting soils can reduce rates of emissions of any remaining carbon stocks. Reconnect impaired water bodies. Ponded freshwater in degraded wetlands behind artificial barrier, such as culverts and dams that truncate coastal inlets, are likely a significant source of CH4. Reconnecting impaired and impounded water to tidal saline water bodies reduces CH4 emissions, as soil microbes switch to utilizing sulfate as a preferred energy source. The coastline of New England, like many coastlines hosts numerous impaired waters behind coastal barriers. Reconnecting these to tides will likely have a net global warming benefit as well as restoring other ecosystem services when coastal wetlands recover. Restoration of coastal wetlands. A range of wetland restoration activities can provide co-benefits including net GHG benefits and protection of ecosystem services. Activities seek to restore the combination of native plants, hydrology, and sediment, which leads to a self-sustaining productive wetland. Some examples are: lowering of water levels on impounded former wetlands, removing tidal barriers; rewetting of drained wetlands (for restoration purposes); raising soil surfaces with dredged material; increasing sediment supply by removing dikes or levees; restoring salinity conditions; improving water quality, revegetation; and combinations of the above. The results of these activities include improved ecological function in coastal wetlands and beneficial climate adaptation outcomes. Capturing the Blue Carbon Values of Coastal Habitat Opportunities for Managers and Policymakers There are a number of opportunities that managers and policymakers can tap into to advance the conservation or restoration of blue carbon ecosystems. Improved policies: Adjusting existing policies that reduce climate change impacts through management of wetland or organic soils or redirecting financing from subsidies for practices that increase emissions to those that reduce emissions are two low-hanging opportunities for policymakers. Additionally, with climate change playing a bigger role in state and federal policymaking, coastal decision-makers can seek opportunities to link blue carbon and climate change policy. For example, a state may consider incorporating management of organic soils in their annual accounting of GHG emissions and sinks. States and local permitting agencies might also require consideration of net GHG impacts of a proposed development during review (much like impact on endangered species or even traffic impacts must be taken into account) and offer GHG mitigation options or offsets, such as wetlands restoration or conservation. Communities seeking nature based approaches to storm protection might also explore the inclusion of wetlands within the landscape, which will provide additional blue carbon and wider ecosystem benefits in addition to reducing flood protection costs. Improved perceptions: Publicizing the GHG values of tidal wetlands could improve public perception about the value of tidal wetland restoration and conservation, especially if put into the context of additional ecosystem service benefits. Resource managers, project proponents, funding agencies, and others are encouraged to communicate the GHG benefits of wetland activities at the project, landscape, and/or estuary scale. Improved land management: Improved practices for the management of wetland and organic soils can reduce the emissions of GHGs. Improving the hydrological condition of degraded wetlands with impaired hydrology can reduce CH 4 emissions and stimulate carbon sequestration, for example. There is an opportunity to review existing land management practices and identify any simple adjustments that may improve GHG emissions and sinks.

Incentives for new projects: Coastal wetland habitat restoration projects provide numerous ecological and economic benefits, including jobs, fisheries, climate and other benefits. Further work is needed to document the climate mitigation benefits of wetland restoration. The imperative of mitigating for climate change could lead to the prioritization of projects that provide climate mitigation benefits, if such policies are adopted. Carbon finance: The issuance and sale of carbon credits generated by wetland habitat restoration or conservation may be an attractive financing option for some projects. The costs of GHG monitoring, reporting, and verification must be weighed against the potential value of carbon credits. In many cases, additional project funding sources will be required. For example, carbon finance might be used to pay for the long-term maintenance and management of a restored area, an aspect of projects typically under-funded, as a cost share for funds provided for project development. Putting It Into Action There are several steps policymakers and coastal managers can take to integrate coastal blue carbon considerations in their work. Learn more about coastal blue carbon. There is a growing body of resources available to help managers, policymakers and the public understand, evaluate, and apply coastal blue carbon in their own settings. Integrate. Coastal managers and policymakers can integrate carbon aspects of wetlands, along with other criteria, into their wetlands and other project and policy evaluation (e.g. transportation or mitigation projects). Consideration of the blue carbon or GHG impacts of a project could lead to more restoration and conservation of vital coastal wetland ecosystems. For example, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, under the Global Warming Solutions Act is currently investigating the inclusion of land use change involving wetlands on the state s GHG footprint. This analysis may inform future planning of restoration activities. Taking the Lead In 2013 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released guidance to nations on approaches for accounting for GHG emissions and reduction associated with wetlands management. Included in this document are procedures for accounting on coastal wetlands as well as inland peatlands and inorganic soils. This year the State of Massachusetts and the U.S. EPA are taking a global lead in being the first to bring wetlands into their GHG emissions accounts. Through this process the benefits of improved wetland management will be accounted for and recognized. Demonstrate. Explore and demonstrate market and non-market blue carbon projects that improve carbon sequestration and reduce GHG emissions through wetland management. While this is still an emerging concept, the scientific tools are available to apply to quantify benefits, including tools developed under the BWM project. Early adopters are needed to demonstrate to the world the value of blue carbon. For example, across the Commonwealth of Massachusetts some 40 tidal barriers have been removed, restoring wetlands, with potential for many more to come. Quantifying the GHG benefits of these actions will raise attention within regions as to the value of similar activities within in their jurisdiction. Learn More Potential Policy & Management Applications of Blue Carbon is part of a series of informational resources developed under the Bringing Wetlands to Market Project (BWM), which was led by the Waquoit Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve (WBNERR), The BWM Project examined the relationship between salt marshes, climate change, and nitrogen pollution and provided cutting edge science and tools to help coastal managers and policy makers leverage blue carbon to achieve broader wetlands management, restoration, and conservation goals through verified carbon markets and climate and conservation policy avenues. Learn more about the project and other available resources at: Bringing Wetlands to Market Project Webpage: https://www.waquoitbayreserve.org/research-monitoring/salt-marsh-carbon-project/

WAQUOIT BAY NATIONAL ESTUARINE RESEARCH RESERVE Founded in 1888 as the Marine Biological Laboratory