Mission Spacecraft and Operations Overview MAVEN Science Community Workshop December 2, 2012

Similar documents
The 2013 MAVEN Mission To Mars. Bruce Jakosky MAVEN Principal Investigator University of Colorado

STEREO Guidance & Control

A Fractionated Space Weather Base at L 5 using CubeSats & Solar Sails

AT&T Global Network Client for Windows Product Support Matrix January 29, 2015

MISSION DESIGN AND OPERATIONS CONSIDERATIONS FOR NASA S LUNAR RECONNAISSANCE ORBITER

Analysis One Code Desc. Transaction Amount. Fiscal Period

JPL ANOMALY ISSUES. Henry B. Garrett Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA, 91109

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

Penn State University Physics 211 ORBITAL MECHANICS 1

2. Orbits. FER-Zagreb, Satellite communication systems 2011/12

Dawn - Overview, Science Objectives, Mission Progress. Hap McSween For PI Chris Russell

LAUNCH AND COMMISSIONING OF THE LUNAR RECONNAISSANCE ORBITER (LRO)

Tropical Horticulture: Lecture 2

Trajectory Design with STK/Astrogator. New Horizons Mission Tutorial

AIDA: Asteroid Impact & Deflection Assessment A Joint ESA-NASA Mission. Joint ESA NASA AIDA Team

Case 2:08-cv ABC-E Document 1-4 Filed 04/15/2008 Page 1 of 138. Exhibit 8

Chapter 2. Mission Analysis. 2.1 Mission Geometry

Orbit Transfers for Dawn s Vesta Operations: Navigation and Mission Design Experience

Lecture L17 - Orbit Transfers and Interplanetary Trajectories

Quest- 1 Satellite Functional Description

Autonomous Operations for Small, Low-Cost Missions: SME, EOR (STEDI), DATA, and Pluto Express OUTLINE. Visions for Future, Low-Cost Missions

Renewable Energy. Solar Power. Courseware Sample F0

Enhanced Vessel Traffic Management System Booking Slots Available and Vessels Booked per Day From 12-JAN-2016 To 30-JUN-2017

Analysis on the Long-term Orbital Evolution and Maintenance of KOMPSAT-2

Can Hubble be Moved to the International Space Station? 1

Mission Design for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter

PART III IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MASTER SCIENCE PLAN

Celestial Sphere. Celestial Coordinates. Lecture 3: Motions of the Sun and Moon. ecliptic (path of Sun) ecliptic (path of Sun)

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Yield Reduction due to Shading:

Mars Sample Return Campaign: An Overview. Dr. Firouz Naderi Associate Director NASA s JPL

m Antenna Subnet Telecommunications Interfaces

Coverage Characteristics of Earth Satellites

Satellite technology

RS platforms. Fabio Dell Acqua - Gruppo di Telerilevamento

Chapter 5 Astronomy 110 Motions of the Sun and the Moon 1

Ashley Institute of Training Schedule of VET Tuition Fees 2015

Auburn University s Solar Photovoltaic Array Tilt Angle and Tracking Performance Experiment

Mars Earth Return Vehicle (MERV) Propulsion Options

Nanosat 4 Competition

Solar Power for Outer Planets Study

USE OF SCILAB FOR SPACE MISSION ANALYSIS AND FLIGHT DYNAMICS ACTIVITIES

Frequencies for Mars Local High-Rate Links

Pioneer Venus: Mission Characterization. Dr. Andrew Ketsdever Lesson 2 AME 5595

Overview of NASA s Laser Communications Relay Demonstration

The NASA Global Differential GPS System (GDGPS) and The TDRSS Augmentation Service for Satellites (TASS)

CHAPTER 2 ORBITAL DYNAMICS

Douglas Adams The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy

Resonant Orbital Dynamics in Extrasolar Planetary Systems and the Pluto Satellite System. Man Hoi Lee (UCSB)

Orbital Mechanics and Space Geometry

Satellite Mission Analysis

The Four Seasons. A Warm Up Exercise. A Warm Up Exercise. A Warm Up Exercise. The Moon s Phases

SAC-C MISSION 2.0 CONAE INSTRUMENTS DESCRIPTION 2.1 MMRS

PHSC 3033: Meteorology Seasons

Where On Earth Will Three Different Satellites Provide Simultaneous Coverage?

Performances Optimization of Remote Sensing Satellite Constellations: a Heuristic Method

Robotic Pre-Cursor Contribution to Human NEA Mission. H. Kuninaka JSPEC/JAXA

SCOOP: The Future of NDBC Real-Time Data Collection and Reporting

Automated Spacecraft Scheduling The ASTER Example

Interaction of Energy and Matter Gravity Measurement: Using Doppler Shifts to Measure Mass Concentration TEACHER GUIDE

Coordinate Systems. Orbits and Rotation

HybridSail. Hybrid Solar Sails for Active Debris Removal Final Report

DSL Mission Concept at Lunar Orbit

The National Strategy, Current Activities for Space Technology Development and Application

Consumer ID Theft Total Costs

Orientation to the Sky: Apparent Motions

'l'ehisat. A IfICROSATBLLI'l'E SYS'l'EH FOR AlJ'rONOHOUS ENVIRONIfElI'.rAL IfONI'l'ORING SERVICR

SATELLITE ORBIT DETERMINATION AND ANALYSIS (S.O.D.A) A VISUAL TOOL OF SATELLITE ORBIT FOR SPACE ENGINEERING EDUCATION & RESEARCH

PART II OVERVIEW OF MARS EXPRESS SCIENCE OPERATIONS

Dancing in the Dark: How GNSS Satellites Cross the Earth s Shadow

Lessons Learned during the Refurbishment and Testing of an Observatory after Longterm

CAFIS REPORT

Roles: Scrum Master & Project Manager

The Spacewire interface for HERSCHEL/SCORE suborbital mission

TOPIC: CLOUD CLASSIFICATION

ShindaiSat : A Visible Light Communication Experimental Micro-Satellite

CENTERPOINT ENERGY TEXARKANA SERVICE AREA GAS SUPPLY RATE (GSR) JULY Small Commercial Service (SCS-1) GSR

Iodine RF Ion Thruster Development Busek Co. Inc. Vlad Hruby PhD, President

THE MESSENGER SPACECRAFT GUIDANCE AND CONTROL SYSTEM *

FREE ONLINE APPLICATION OF CALCULATION

Bi-Directional DGPS for Range Safety Applications

GNSS satellite attitude characteristics during eclipse season

Computing & Telecommunications Services Monthly Report March 2015

Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) Mission

THE MASTER PLAN CAMPAIGN. Workshop RPAS (WS 03) 22 January 2015

On May 27, 2010, the U.S. Air. Satellite. Antenna Phase Center and Attitude Modeling

Astromechanics Two-Body Problem (Cont)

Section 2. Satellite Orbits

APOPHIS 2029 A UNIQUE MISSION OPPORTUNITY

Transcription:

Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) Mission Mission Spacecraft and Operations Overview MAVEN Science Community Workshop December 2, 2012 Chris Waters Spacecraft Design Lead Lockheed Martin MAVEN MOS Technical Review June 5-6, 2012 1

Spacecraft Overview Launch Configuration Monoprop Propulsion System 1640 kg capacity N 2 H 4 tank Regulated during MOI Blowdown during mission 3-Axis Stabilized Platform Reaction wheel control, Nominally sun-pointed during operations RWA Pyramid Articulated Payload Platform +/- 90º elevation travel (inner) +/- 177.5º azimuth travel (outer) 2x55 A-hr Li Ion Batteries Fixed Solar Arrays ~1200W power generation, 20º gull wing angle provides aerostability during atmospheric encounters Fixed High Gain Antenna 2m dual reflector X-band downlink rates up to 550 kbps 2

Instruments and Payloads (SSL) (GSFC) (LASP) Electra Relay Package (JPL) Bob Ergun, LASP Electra UHF Transceiver and Helix Antenna; Larry Epp, JPL Electra 3

Instrument and Payload Locations SWEA SWIA LPW (2) EUV MAG (2) PFDPU SEP (2) Particles and Fields STATIC EUT Helix NGIMS MAVEN MOS Technical Review June 5-6, 2012 Electra Remote Sensing RSDPU IUVS 4

Mission Architecture 20-Day Launch Period 18 Nov 2013 (Open) 7 Dec 2013 (Close) LV: Atlas V 401 Ten Month Ballistic Cruise to Mars Type-II Trajectory Early Cruise Late Cruise Northern Approach ~1233 m/s V Orbit Insertion: 22 Sept 2014 (Open) 28 Sept 2014 (Close) Capture Orbit: 35 hour period 380 km P2 75 inclination One Year of Science Operations 5

Mission Phases/Timeline 2013 2014 2015 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec HGA UHF Thruster Science Boom Deployments Solar Cal Cal Cal Cals & Science Commissioning Conjunction Launch MOI Early Cruise Late Cruise Transition to Science 2022 Dec Jan Legend: TCM #1 #2 #3 #4 Significant Event Delta-V Maneuver PRM * As required Deep Dips Science Phase #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 Relay Tracks* Extended Mission & Relay Periapse Raise* Flight Software Phase Mission Operations Phase Phase Boundary Definition Prelaunch Launch Launch-1 day (power on) to Transfer to internal power on the pad (not part of Mission Operations Plan) Launch Transfer to internal power to Launch+1 day (approximately, depends on SPK/ephemeris availability) Early Cruise Cruise Operators configure for cruise, and set Mission Phase to Early Cruise (approximately L+1 day) Late Cruise Slew to HGA Earth point (approximately L+90 days) MOI MOI MOI sequence load (approximately MOI-3 days) Science Transition Immediately following confirmation of successful MOI Science Extended (approximately MOI+3 hours) Lost In Time (LIT) N/A Used for default safe mode state if spacecraft cannot autonomously resolve the mission phase Launch window: 11/18-12/7/2013 Ten month ballistic cruise Mars Arrival/MOI: 9/22-28/2014 Five week transition period One Earth-year nominal mission Extended science and/or relay Best estimate supports 29 additional months in the nominal orbit, plus 6 years in a raised orbit (~200 km periapse) 6

Cruise Cruise Configuration No science boom deployments until after Mars insertion 7

Science Operations Overview Orbit chosen to observe a wide range of geometries Right Ascension and Ascending Node precession rate ~ -0.6 deg/day Argument of Periapsis precession rate ~ -0.8 deg/day Two atmospheric regimes, defined by periapsis density Nominal (0.05 0.15 kg/km 3 ) Deep Dips (2.0 3.5 kg/km 3 ) 5 one week campaigns Numerous operational constraints to be managed Pointing control mode singularities Sun in FOV constraints Solar eclipses and Earth occultation Instrument high voltage management due to corona effects Limited Earth communications Daily ranging contacts (unattended) Two 5-hr DSN contacts per week for downlink of recorded science and engineering data and for S/C and instrument command uplinks Necessitates significant autonomy in S/C and instrument commanding Continuous DSN coverage for deep dip campaigns Limited tracking data for Navigation Requires autonomous Periapsis Timing Estimator (PTE) to meet orbit timing requirements 8

Science Orbit Timing and Geometry S/C generally sun-pointed for the body mounted instruments Orbit broken into 3 segments to accommodate APP pointing Apoapse (IUVS Disk Mapping) Mid-altitude sides -inbound and outbound (STATIC and IUVS) Periapse (NGIMS, STATIC, IUVS sharing) Small set of weekly ops scenarios Balance conflicting instrument requirements Account for S/C and instrument pointing constraints A nominal scenario used for the majority of the science phase Constraint scenarios used to accommodate various spacecraft and instrument constraints S Slew Slew Slew Periapse D E A T Outbound Side Apoapse Slew Inbound Side ALTITUDE (km) TIME (rel to Per.) 1170 500 500 1570 5000 5400 5400-21.4-11.4 Actual 11.4 26.4 79.1 Periapsis (~150-170 km) 5000 89.1 180.0 190.0 1170 247.6 9

Nominal Science Operations 10

Science Scenarios Definitions 1 1a 2 2a 2b 3 4 4a 4b 5 SC Apoapse IUVS Disc Scan IUVS Disc Scan IUVS Disc Scan IUVS Disc Scan IUVS Disc Scan IUVS Disc Scan IUVS Disc Scan IUVS Disc Scan IUVS Disc Scan IUVS Disc Scan Sun-Nadir Orbit 1 Sides IUVS Coronal Scan IUVS Coronal Scan IUVS Coronal Scan IUVS Coronal Scan IUVS Coronal Scan IUVS Coronal Scan IUVS Coronal Scan IUVS Coronal Scan IUVS Coronal Scan IUVS Coronal Scan Sun-Nadir Periapse Fly-Y Fly-Y Fly-Y Fly-Y Fly-Z Sun-Velocity Fly-Y Fly-Y Fly-Z Sun-Velocity Sun-Nadir APP@peri Ram-Nadir Ram-Horizontal Ram-Nadir Ram-Nadir Ram-Nadir Ram-Track Ram-Nadir Ram-Nadir Ram-Nadir Ram-Track Sun-Safe Apoapse IUVS Disc Scan IUVS Disc Scan IUVS Disc Scan IUVS Disc Scan IUVS Disc Scan IUVS Disc Scan IUVS Disc Scan IUVS Disc Scan IUVS Disc Scan IUVS Disc Scan Sun-Nadir Orbit 2 Sides STATIC Sun-Nadir STATIC Sun-Nadir STATIC Sun-Nadir STATIC Sun-Nadir STATIC Sun-Nadir STATIC Sun-Nadir IUVS Coronal Scan IUVS Coronal Scan IUVS Coronal Scan IUVS Coronal Scan Sun-Nadir Periapse Sun-Velocity Sun-Velocity Fly-Y Fly-Y Fly-Z Sun-Velocity Fly-Y Fly-Y Fly-Z Sun-Velocity Sun-Nadir APP@peri Ram-Track Ram-Track Ram-Nadir Ram-Horizontal Ram-Nadir Ram-Track Ram-Nadir Ram-Horizontal Ram-Nadir Ram-Track Sun-Safe Represents difference from Nominal Scenario 1 Nominal Scenarios Scenario 1 Primary scenario used for ~70% of mission Scenario 1a Alternate Nominal Scenario to allow STATIC APP Ram-Horizontal (R-H) pointing during Periapsis Scenario 2 Used when attitude singularity precludes use of periapsis sun velocity pointing mode Scenario 2a Alternate Scenario 2 to allow STATIC APP R-H pointing during periapsis Scenario 2b (Fly-Z) Alternate Scenario 2 for use when simultaneous constraints preclude use of Fly-Y and Sun-Velocity attitudes Scenario 3 Used during power constrained periods of mission (precludes Fly-Y attitude during periapsis which takes solar arrays off the sun Scenario 4 Used when attitude singularities preclude use of side segment sun-nadir and periapsis sun-velocity pointing modes Constraint Scenarios Scenario 4a Alternate Scenario 4 to allow STATIC APP R-H pointing during periapsis Scenario 4b (Fly-Z) Alternate Scenario 4 for use when simultaneous constraints preclude use of Fly-Y and Sun-Velocity attitudes Scenario 5 Used during power constrained periods of mission and when attitude singularity prevents use of side segment sunnadir mode Solar Conjunction S/C Sun pointed with APP parked in sunsafe position Communications: 2x per week per DSN visibility constraints Deep Dips: executed with a selected scenario as the baseline, but when scheduled HGA comm is available, all non-periapse segments will be operated in Earth Point 11

Science Phase Timeline 12

Summary Relatively simple spacecraft design Enabled low cost/risk development Necessitates compromises between science optimization and operational complexity/cost Integrated plan to manage competing science desires Menu of pre-canned operational scenarios Default scenario balances pointing desires across instruments Alternate scenarios to manage S/C and instrument constraints Baseline operations defined for duration of primary mission Five deep dip campaigns One special event per month Magnetometer calibrations, IUVS stellar occultation observations Spacecraft and instrument constraints 13

BACK-UP MATERIAL MAVEN MOS Technical Review June 5-6, 2012 14

Science Observation Modes Science Mode ACS Mode Slew Mode APP Mode Attitude IUVS Disc Scan Inertial Hold Semi-major Target IUVS Coronal Scan Inertial Hold Semi-minor Target STATIC Sun-Nadir Sun-Nadir Sun-Nadir Target Sun-Velocity Commanded Position Commanded Position Commanded Position Sun-Velocity Sun-Velocity Target Velocity Track Fly-Y Velocity-Nadir Velocity Target Commanded Position Aligns +Z to Sun, Constrains +X towards orbit semi-major axis; APP: +j aligned with orbit semi-major axis, -k towards orbit normal Aligns +Z to Sun, Constrains +X towards orbit semi-minor axis; APP: +j aligned with orbit semi-minor axis, -k towards orbit normal Aligns +Z to Sun, Constrains +X towards Nadir; APP: inner gimbal = 0, outer = 25 deg Aligns +Z to Sun, Constrains +/-Y towards planet-relative velocity; APP: +i tracks planet-relative velocity Aligns +/-Y to planet-relative velocity, Constrains +X towards nadir; APP: ram-nadir: inner = 0, outer = -65/115 deg to align +i with planet-rel velocity; ram-horizontal: inner = +/-90, outer = -65/115 deg to align +i with planet-rel velocity and +k towards nadir Fly-Z Velocity-Nadir Velocity Target Commanded Position Aligns -Z to planet-relative velocity, Constrains +X towards nadir; APP: ram-nadir: inner = 0, outer = 25 deg to align +i with planet-rel velocity; ram-horizontal not supported Deep Dip Velocity-Nadir Velocity Target Velocity Track Commanded Comm Earth Point Earth Target Position Stellar Occultations Inertial Hold Sun Inertial Commanded Position Damps rates to follow profile of planet-relative velocity vector around periapse; APP: +i tracks planet-relative velocity Aligns +Z to Earth, Constrains -Y towards Sun; APP: inner = 90, outer = -65 deg Aligns +Z to Earth, +X generally towards selected star; APP: IUVS stellar occ FOV pointed at star, APP +i normal to horizon (up) 15

Deep-Dip Schedule Deep Dip Number Region Start Date Science Mission Day Periapse Latitude (sun-rel) (deg) Periapse Longitude (sun-rel) (deg) Solar Zenith Angle (deg) Eclipse Duration (min) SPE (deg) 1 Anti-solar 12/26/2014 64 41-178 139 31 28 1.38 2 Dusk Term 2/6/2015 107 18 108 108 20 21 1.41 3 Sub-solar 4/10/2015 170-3 4 5 77 11 1.47 4 Dawn Term 6/26/2015 247-44 -108 102 3 3 1.57 5 South Pole 8/21/2015 303-81 91 91 28 13 1.63 Sun Range (AU) Note: schedule may be adjusted during the science phase based on actual conditions Declination of Periapse in Sun-Mars Frame (deg) 11/4/14 11/18/14 12/3/14 12/18/14 Deep Dip Keep Out Deep Dip Concern Fly-Y Concern Fly-Y Keep Out 1st Year - Nominal 8/1/15 7/2/15 7/17/15 6/16/15 6/1/15 5/17/15 5/2/15 90 60 30 10/15/15-30 -60 4/17/15 1/31/15 2/15/15 3/2/15 3/17/15 4/1/15 1/2/15 1/17/15 0 Deep Dips -180-135 -90-45 0 45 90 135 180 Dates Eclipsed Start of Science Phase 8/16/15 8/31/15 9/15/15 9/30/15-90 Right Ascension of Periapse in Sun-Mars Frame (deg) 16

Science Phase Timeline w/ Inst Constraints 17