Case: 1:11-cv-09308 Document #: 1045 Filed: 02/06/14 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:47625 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS



Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendants.

Case3:07-cv JSW Document123 Filed10/12/12 Page1 of 5

Attorneys for Plainliff Dallas Faulkner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Case: 1:13-cv SSB-SKB Doc #: 9 Filed: 03/11/14 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 31

Case4:13-cv KAW Document64 Filed12/16/14 Page1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

Case 1:13-cv GBL-TRJ Document 54 Filed 03/10/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 318

3:05-cv CRB Document 418 Filed 12/03/2007 Page 1 of 3

Case 2:09-cv WBS -DAD Document 87 Filed 06/17/11 Page 1 of 3

This Court entered judgment in favor of Plaintiffs on January 12, Doc. 51.

Case5:15-cv NC Document1 Filed06/10/15 Page1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 3:11-cv RBL Document 40 Filed 06/14/13 Page 1 of 11


Case 2:14-cv CW-BCW Document 62 Filed 10/20/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:13-cv AWA-LRL Document 111 Filed 01/24/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 864

Case3:13-cv JST Document52 Filed04/29/14 Page1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION

Case 3:11-cv RBD-JBT Document 16 Filed 09/16/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID 52

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365

Case 4:08-cv RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10

Case Doc 2277 Filed 04/15/14 Entered 04/15/14 14:07:00 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 316 Filed: 03/27/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:2738

Appeal No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT APPLE INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, PSYSTAR CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 2:06-cv FCD-KJM Document 220 Filed 06/02/2009 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. Finjan, Inc., Petitioner v. FireEye, Inc.

Case 1:14-cv JEI-KMW Document 43 Filed 05/20/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 254

Case 1:03-cv HHK Document Filed 10/15/10 Page 1 of 9 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

NOTICE OF LODGMENT OF EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL 11-cv DMS (WVG)

Case3:07-md SI Document6657 Filed09/07/12 Page1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case: 1:09-cv Document #: 48 Filed: 10/08/09 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:<pageid>

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE DIVISION

Case Doc 2193 Filed 03/07/14 Entered 03/07/14 11:33:32 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5

How To Answer A Complaint In A Civil Case

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Jose) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:11-cv LHK

Case 1:12-md PB Document 93 Filed 06/05/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case 1:14-cv FDS Document 64 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:10-cv RPP

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Ask to speak in Court about the fairness of the settlement.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

[Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case sgj15 Doc 76 Filed 04/14/14 Entered 04/14/14 16:41:20 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

8:09-mn JFA Date Filed 06/28/12 Entry Number 228 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv CBA-VVP Document 13 Filed 01/10/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 82

Case 5:05-cv JW Document Filed 03/26/2009 Page 2 of 64

Case 2:14-cv JAM-KJN Document 10 Filed 06/05/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE No. 09-CV JCC

Case KG Doc 373 Filed 11/20/15 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11

Paper 23 Tel: Entered: June 18, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Case KG Doc 284 Filed 11/06/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendants, Nominal Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CA No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case3:12-cv CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12

Case: 1:05-cv Document #: 534 Filed: 07/13/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:17360

Plaintiff, vs. Case 3:07-cv BR Document 223 Filed 06/23/11 Page 1 of 5 Page ID#: 2010 MOTION FOR ORDER TO (I) ALLOW CERTAIN CLAIMS ET AL.

v. No. D-202-CV

Case 3:08-cv JM-CAB Document 9 Filed 08/25/2008 Page 1 of 7

Case5:12-cv EJD Document136 Filed01/29/15 Page1 of 7

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Jose) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:11-cv LHK

Case: 4:12-cv CEJ Doc. #: 182 Filed: 07/17/12 Page: 1 of 4 PageID #: 4880

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:06-cv OWW -SMS Document 80 Filed 01/23/08 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:07-cv REB-KLM Document 31 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case: 1:08-cv SAS-KLL Doc #: 102 Filed: 01/15/14 Page: 1 of 4 PAGEID #: 1181

Case3:12-cv CRB Document51-1 Filed03/22/13 Page1 of 5

Case Document 619 Filed in TXSB on 05/27/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:94-cv LKK-GGH Document 1119 Filed 09/17/2004 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

2:07-cv DCN Date Filed 08/17/2007 Entry Number 99 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:07-cv GMS Document 18 Filed 04/07/2008 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

If you worked as a Service Technician at Source Refrigeration & HVAC, you could get a payment from this class action settlement.

Case KRH Doc 2247 Filed 04/26/16 Entered 04/26/16 17:22:12 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 7

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 21 Filed: 05/23/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:118

Case 1:14-cv ERK-JMA Document 1-1 Filed 02/27/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

8:11-mn JMC Date Filed 04/22/15 Entry Number 150 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 8:09-cv MRP-MLG Document 8 Filed 10/27/2009 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORID A ORLANDO DIVISION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. In re: JEFFERY W. POTTER, No MS

Case4:13-cv SBA Document40 Filed10/14/14 Page1 of 11

Case: 1:10-hc JGC Doc #: 61 Filed: 02/03/10 1 of 7. PageID #: 727

Case 6:66-cv MV-WPL Document Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 3:11-cv RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Transcription:

Case: 1:11-cv-09308 Document #: 1045 Filed: 02/06/14 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:47625 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS In re Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Patent Litigation This Document Relates To: All Cases Case No. 1:11-cv-09308 Judge James F. Holderman Magistrate Judge Sidney Schenkier AGREED MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the terms of a separate agreement, Cisco Systems, Inc. ( Cisco ) and Defendants Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Innovatio Management, LLC, and Noel B. Whitley (collectively, Innovatio ) have agreed to settle, adjust and compromise all claims in the above-captioned actions, including Case Nos. 1:11-cv-09308 (consolidated) and 1:11-cv-09309 (originally 1:11-cv-00425 (D. Del.)). The parties, therefore, move this Court to dismiss all claims and counterclaims by Cisco against Innovatio and by Innovatio against Cisco made in any of those actions with prejudice to the re-filing of same. The parties also move this Court to dismiss all claims made by Innovatio against Cisco customers in any of the actions consolidated in Case No. 1:11-cv-09308 (including, but not limited to, 1:11- cv-09309) based on their making (including using any apparatus or practicing any method in making), using, selling, offering for sale, leasing, exporting, importing, or otherwise disposing of any Cisco product or any combination of a Cisco product with one or more other items, with prejudice to the re-filing of same.

Case: 1:11-cv-09308 Document #: 1045 Filed: 02/06/14 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:47626 The parties further move the Court to order that all costs and expenses relating to this litigation (including attorney and expert fees and expenses) shall be borne solely by the party incurring same. A proposed Order is attached as Exhibit A. AGREED: /s/ Matthew G. McAndrews Matthew G. McAndrews Raymond P. Niro, Jr. Brian E. Haan Gabriel I. Opatken NIRO, HALLER & NIRO 181 West Madison St., Suite 4600 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Telephone: (312) 236-0733 E-mail: mmcandrews@nshn.com E-mail: rnirojr@nshn.com E-mail: bhaan@nshn.com E-mail: gopatken@nshn.com Thomas J. Wimbiscus Gregory C. Schodde Peter J. McAndrews Ronald H. Spuhler Shawn L. Peterson McANDREWS, HELD & MALLOY, LTD. 500 West Madison St., Suite 3400 Chicago, Illinois 60661 Telephone: (312) 775-8000 E-mail: twimbiscus@mcandrews-ip.com E-mail: gschodde@mcandrews-ip.com E-mail: pmcandrews@mcandrews-ip.com E-mail: rspuhler@mcandrews-ip.com E-mail: speterson@mcandrews-ip.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, INNOVATIO IP VENTURES, LLC /s/ Steven M. Cherny Steven M. Cherny 601 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10169 212.446.4800 (Telephone) 212.446.4900 (Facsimile) Steven.cherny@kirkland.com Michael W. De Vries 333 South Hope Street Los Angeles, California 90071 213.680.8400 (Telephone) michael.devries@kirkland.com Adam R. Alper (Pro Hac Vice) 555 California Street San Francisco, CA 94104 415.439.1400 (Telephone) 415.439.1500 (Facsimile) adam.alper@kirkland.com Gianni Cutri 300 North LaSalle Chicago, Illinois 60654 312.862.2000 (Telephone) 312.862.2200 (Facsimile) gianni.cutri@kirkland.com Attorneys for Defendant and Declaratory Judgment Plaintiff, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 2

Case: 1:11-cv-09308 Document #: 1045 Filed: 02/06/14 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:47627 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on February 6, 2014 a true and correct copy of the foregoing AGREED MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE was electronically filed with the Court via the CM/ECF system which sent notification of such filing to all Counsel of Record. Dated: February 6, 2014 /s/ Steven M. Cherny Steven M. Cherny 601 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10169 212.446.4800 (Telephone) 212.446.4900 (Facsimile) Steven.cherny@kirkland.com 3

Case: 1:11-cv-09308 Document #: 1045-1 Filed: 02/06/14 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:47628 EXHIBIT A

Case: 1:11-cv-09308 Document #: 1045-1 Filed: 02/06/14 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:47629 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS In re Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Patent Litigation This Document Relates To: All Cases Case No. 1:11-cv-09308 Judge James F. Holderman Magistrate Judge Sidney Schenkier [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE On this day, Cisco Systems, Inc. ( Cisco ) and Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Innovatio Management, LLC, and Noel B. Whitley (collectively, Innovatio ) announced to the Court that they have settled their respective claims for relief asserted in the above-captioned actions. The Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion that their request for dismissal should be GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims and counterclaims by Cisco against Innovatio and by Innovatio against Cisco in the above-captioned actions, including Case Nos. 1:11-cv-09308 (consolidated) and 1:11-cv-09309 (originally 1:11-cv-00425 (D. Del.)), are dismissed, with prejudice to the re-filing of same. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all claims by Innovatio against Cisco customers in any of the actions consolidated in Case No. 1:11-cv-09308 (including, but not limited to, 1:11-cv- 09309) based on their making (including using any apparatus or practicing any method in making), using, selling, offering for sale, leasing, exporting, importing, or otherwise disposing of any Cisco product or any combination of a Cisco product with one or more other items, are dismissed, with prejudice to the re-filing of same.

Case: 1:11-cv-09308 Document #: 1045-1 Filed: 02/06/14 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:47630 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys fees, costs of court and expenses shall be borne by the party incurring the same. This is a final judgment. Signed this day of, 2014. JUDGE JAMES F. HOLDERMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE