Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Nov 25, 2015 Plast solceller / fremtidens solcelle(r) Lauritzen, Hanne Publication date: 2012 Link to publication Citation (APA): Lauritzen, H. (2012). Plast solceller / fremtidens solcelle(r) [Lyd og/eller billed produktion (digital)]. Gå-hjemmøde for Roskilde Håndværkerforening, Roskilde, Danmark, 07/11/2012 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal? If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Plast solceller / fremtidens solcelle(r) Specialkonsulent Hanne Lauritzen
SOLCELLE INSTALLATIONER I DANMARK Akk. 2011: Ultimo 2012: 3627 installationer 11 MW > 30.000 installationer 150 MW 2
The least light for the $ anywhere in the world Zambia 2009 3
Konarka PowerPlastic www.konarka.com
Den globale energiudfordring Er plastsolcellen en mulig løsning? Konklusion 5
International Energy Outlook 2011 World energy consumption U.S. Energy Information Administration 6
0.8 GW, Avedøre værket 0.2 GW, Rørsand II 7
0.3 GW, Platforma Solar de Almeria (ES) 8 2 January 2013
IEA, Energy Technology Perspectives 2008 Total Energy Resources
Addressing the 1 GW challenge is about investment of limited resources Return on Investment (ROI) Payback Time Energy Return Factor (ERF) Energy Payback Time (EPBT) 10
The 1 GW a day challenge is about embedded energy, but also about scalability High processing speed Low materials usage No scarcely available materials Compatible with recycling or composting 4 sec. 8 sec. 36 hours 11
ORGANISKE SOLCELLE /OPV / PLAST SOLCELLE: SILVER ITO Indium Tin oxid 13
Life cycle assessment as an R&D tool Espinosa et al., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 95 (2011) 1293-1302
1 sec. 15
Espinosa et al., Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 5117-5132 16
17
Beyond Process H FEASIBLE CHALLENGING Espinosa et al., Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 5117-5132 18
Beyond Process H FEASIBLE CHALLENGING Espinosa et al., Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 5117-5132 20
21
22
An attractive energy investment? a desktop study Operational life EPBT ERF Crystalline Si 30 years 2 years 15 ProcessOne, PCE=3% 2 years 1 ½ years ~ 1 Process H, PCE=3% 2 years 86 days ~ 10 Feasible assumptions, PCE=3% 2 years 17 days ~ 50 Challenging assump., PCE=3% 2 years 7 days ~ 100 Challenging assump., PCE=10% 5 years 2 days ~ 1000 23
YES, investing energy in the processing of OPV is attractive -and the cost is acceptable 24
1 GW Espinosa et al, Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 5117 5132 25
THANK YOU FOR YOUR KIND ATTENTION 26 14.03.2012
Prof. Frederik Christian Krebs (Head of Group) Dr. Mikkel Jørgensen (Senior Scientist) Dr. Kion Normann (Senior Scientist) Dr. Jens Wenzel Andreasen (Senior Scientist) Dr. Eva Bundgaard (Senior Scientist) Martin H. Petersen (Postdoc) Suren Gevorgyan (Postdoc) Roar Søndergaard (Postdoc) Thomas Tromholt (Ph.D. student) Morten Vesterager Madsen (Ph.D. student) Jon Eggert Carlé ( Ph.D. student) Thomas Riecks Andersen (Ph.D. student) Birgitta Andreasen (Ph.D. student) Dechan Angmo (Ph.D. student) Arvid P.L. Böttiger (Ph.D. student) Henrik Friis Dam (Ph.D. student) Markus Hösel (Ph.D. student) Jakob Jensen (Ph.D. Student) Emil B. L. Pedersen (Ph.D. Student) Ole Hagemann (Lab. Tech.) Torben Kjær (Res. Tech.) Kristian Larsen (Res. Tech.) Dr. Hanne Lauritzen (Special Adviser) Birgit Oksbjerg (communication coordinator) M.Sc. Torben D. Nielsen (Business Developer) 27 Dr. Peter Sommer-Larsen (Head of Programme)