National Transit Database - NTD

Similar documents
March 2015 Prepared by the Department of Finance & Performance Management Regional Peer Review PERFORMANCE MEASURES

2013 Reporting Year NTD. National Transit Database. Transit Profiles: Top 50 Agencies. Office of Budget and Policy

Transit in the United States 3. Operating Costs and Performance Measures 13. Quality of Transit Service 19. ADA Compliance Bus 28

Federal Transit Administration. Options for Financing Public Transportation in the United States

MAKING TRACKS. A Primer for Implementing Transit Fixed Guideway Projects

2013 Public Transportation Fact Book

Transit Technology Alternatives

Passenger Rail Service

City Services Benchmarking: Public Transportation

METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. Independent Accountants Report on Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures

NHDOT Transit Grants Workshop: FTA Section 5310 Programs: Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities. January 12, 2015

Chapter 8 Funding Considerations

Financial Plan Status Report

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE 2009 TRANSPORTATION GRANT APPLICATION PACKET

2012 King County Metro Transit Peer Agency Comparison on Performance Measures

Performance Measures for Public Transit Mobility Managers Presented by: Lalita Sen, Ph.D. Texas Southern University

Quon Kwan. Safety Considerations Related to Commercial Vehicles Using Natural Gas. Natural Gas Vehicle Technology Forum San Diego, CA October 17, 2012

Transportation Alternatives

DRAFT. Martha's Vineyard Coordinated Human Services Transportation Plan

HYBRID BUSES COSTS AND BENEFITS

TRANSIT PERFORMANCE MEASURE TOOLBOX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Chapter 7 Fleet Vehicles and Characteristics

From the FTA 5310 Circular (C9070.1F): 1. ELIGIBLE CAPITAL EXPENSES. Funds for the Section 5310 program are available for capital expenses as defined

District of Columbia State Data Center Quarterly Report Summer 2007

METRO. Fiscal Year 2013 Monthly Board Report. June 2013 (Third Quarter Fiscal Year-to-Date)

1 FIXED ROUTE OVERVIEW

Financial Plan & Implementation. Matrix

WHY NOW? GAS? The Design. Nopetro

Development of an NTD Tool for Vanpool Services

Cost and Financial Analysis

A Review of Transit Technology Specifications

SAFETY & SECURITY NEWSLETTER

ATTACHMENT K 5310 ELIGIBLE COST

Triangle Transit Financial Plan. Durham Orange Light Rail Transit Project

Project Management Oversight Services

The Strategic Assessment of the St. Louis Region

Atlanta Rankings 2014

Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities

Legislative Fiscal Bureau One East Main, Suite 301 Madison, WI (608) Fax: (608)

Ten Year Financial Plan

MANAGEMENT PLAN. Fiscal Year

How much are teachers really paid? A Nationwide Analysis of Teacher Pay

KING COUNTY METRO TRANSIT

Fleet Management Services

Technical Memorandum REVENUE FORECASTS. Prepared for: Prepared by:

TABLE OF CONTENTSI CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTIONI...3 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW...5

CITY OF EL PASO: SUN METRO Legislative Update Briefing

Virginia's Transportation Performance Management System

Overview of the Travel Demand Forecasting Methodology

Economic Impact. of Public Transportation Investment 2014 UPDATE

Self-Storage Investment Trends to Watch. April 16, 2015

We Work for Public Transportation.

Houston-Galveston Regional Transit Services

MAP-21. A Guide To Transit-Related Provisions MAP-21. Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century

Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project San Diego, California New Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2014)

TRANSPORTATION EXPENDITURE REPORT

APPENDIX G OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE COST ESTIMATION MODEL

Coordinated Plan Update and Funding for Transit

Vanpool Program Best Practices: Telephone Survey of Vanpool Programs Nationwide and Summary of Current FTA Requirements

Where Do We Want to Go? How Can We Get There?

Presto Fare Card ibus (Automated Stop Announcements, Cameras) Transit Operating System Replacement

THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION FINANCIAL INSTITUTION FRAUD AND FAILURE REPORT

DVRPC Guidance for CHSTP Project Selection Part 1: Upcoming FY12/FY13 Program Information

Transition from SAFETEA-LU to the new MAP-21 Federal Transportation Act

Research Results Digest 361

U.S. Economic, Capital Markets. and Self-Storage Market Overview

STOP CONSOLIDATION TRANSIT STRATEGIES

Lodging, Rental Car and Meal Taxes on Travelers in the Top 50 U.S. Cities

5.0 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES

How To Vote On A Transit Plan In Ventura County

Transcription:

National Transit Database - NTD Established by Congress in 1974 Primary national database for public transit Collects annual transit performance and financial data, monthly ridership, and safety and security data Summarizes data in various annual reports Federal Transit Administration National Transit Database 1

National Transit Database - NTD Used to calculate Federal funding formulas Supports Peer-group benchmarking Analysis of investment needs Research Urban and rural transit grantees of Federal funding are required to report Federal Transit Administration

www.ntdprogram.com Federal Transit Administration National Transit Database 3

Internet Reporting Login Federal Transit Administration National Transit Database 4

2010 National Transit Database Highlights NTD Reporters by Organization Urban and Rural NTD Reporters by Organization Type (January 2010 December 2010) Urbanized Areas not Served by Public Transit Ridership Transit Ridership Versus Employment (January 2003 January 2011) Safety Annual Transit Fatality Data (January 2000 December 2010) Funding Sources Public Funding for Transit by Government Jurisdiction (January 2000 December 2010) Capital and Operating Funding for Transit by Funding Source (January 2008 to December 2010) Uses of Federal Funds by UZAs Over 200k in Population (January 2010 December 2010) Uses of Federal Funds by UZAs Under 200k in Population (January 2010 December 2010) Transit Asset Data Transit Active Fleet by Vehicle Type (January 2010 December 2010) Change in Fixed Route Bus Service Fuel Types (January 2002 December 2010) Transit Operating Cost and Fares Operating Cost per Vehicle Hour by Mode (January 2010 December 2010) Change in Transit Agency Fringe Benefits Expenses (January 2000 December 2010) Transit Agencies Operating Costs per Revenue Hour versus Farebox Recovery Ratio (January 2010 December 2010) Average Fare and Costs per Trip for Top 50 Fixed-Route Bus Services NTD Transit Agency Profile Summary Summary of Profiles for Top 50 Reporting Agencies (2010 Report Year) WMATA Transit Agency Profile (Fiscal Year 2010) 5

What Is Reported to the NTD? Sources of funds Capital and operating expenditures Amount of service provided Ridership Capital assets Reports vary in detail by size of the transit system reporting Federal Transit Administration

Urban Reporting Agencies (5307) 729 Reporting Agencies 450 UZAs Federal Transit Administration National Transit Database 7

Rural Transit Reporting Agencies in South Dakota Federal Transit Administration National Transit Database 8

Who Reports To The NTD? 2010 Urban NTD Reporters (729 Total) Rural NTD Reporters (1580 Total) Subsidiaries Reporting Separately, 2% Other, Transit Rural 0.5% Agency, 8% Transfers, 1% Private For- Profit, 4% Tribal Subrecipients, 5% Other, 12 2% Private For-Profit, 3% Non-Profit, 2% University, 1% State DOT or MPO, 5% Transit Agency, 34% Merged Reports (81 Total), 1% City or County, 48% State DOT or MPO, 2% University, 5 0.5% Non-Profit, 27% Urban Recipients 10% City or County, 42% Federal Transit Administration 9

Urbanized Areas UZA 466 UZAs 16 Have no fixed route bus service 450 UZAs reporting Federal Transit Administration

Index Jul '06 = 100 Ridership, Employment 108 Transit Ridership Versus Average Gas Price and Employment Transit ridership is slowly recovering from lower employment and a crash in gas prices $4.50 106 $4.00 12-Month Weighted Ridership 104 $3.50 102 100 12-Month Weighted Price of Regular Gas, All Formulations $3.00 $2.50 98 $2.00 96 Index of Weighted Nonfarm Employment, Seasonally Adjusted $1.50 94 Jul '06 Jan '07 Jul '07 Jan '08 Jul '08 Jan '09 Jul '09 Jan '10 Jul '10 Jan '11 Jul '11 $1.00 Source: National Transit Database, U.S. Energy Information Administration's Gas Pump Data History, and Bureau of Labor Statistics' Employment Data. This exhibit contains data from July 2006 to October 2011. Weighted monthly NTD ridership data is available from 2002 onward. The gas price overlay is a 12 month average gas price and therefore ridership, employment, and gas data are all 12 month averages. The graph uses 12 month weighted averages, thereby giving a more accurate representation of the monthly 11 NTD data. However, the ridership and employment data have been indexed for a clear comparison

Total Fatalities Higher Ridership Has Reduced the Fatality Rate per 100 Million PMT Even as Total Fatalities Have Remained Relatively Constant Other Fatalities Suicides Suicides Other Fatalities Non-Suicide / Homicide Fatalities per 100 Million PMT 500 450 400 350 300 0.56 346 0.52 Homicides 322 0.55 306 Non-Suicide/Homicide Fatalities per 100 Million PMT 0.50 0.48 0.48 0.47 0.44 332 282 284 291 288 0.42 296 0.44 303 Homicides 0.41 333 0.60 0.50 0.40 250 0.30 200 150 0.20 100 0.10 50 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 0.00 Note: Exhibit includes data for CR, DR, HR, LR, and MB. Also, fatality totals include both directly operated (DO) and purchase transportation (PT) service types. Source: National Transit Database Report Years 2000 to 2010 Transit Safety and Security Statistics and Analysis Reporting. 12

Billions of Constant 2010 Dollars Total Public Funding for Transit by Government Jurisdiction Federal Share of Funding The Federal share of total transit funding has remained relatively constant over 10 years $45 $40 2010 State 2010 and Federal Local Funding: 2010 Total Funding: $40.4b 35% 30% $35 $30 26% Federal Share, % 26% 25% $25 $27M 2000 State and Local Funding: 2010 State and Local Funding: $30B 20% $20 State and Local Funding 15% $15 10% $10 $5 $0 2000 Federal Funding: $6.8B Federal Funding 2010 Federal Funding: $10.4B 5% 0% Year Source: National Transit Database Report Year 2010. 13

Billions of Current Dollars ARRA (American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009) Raised Federal Funding for Capital Expenditures from 40% to 50% $40 Funding Source: Federal, State, Local $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $0 System Generated Revenue 33% Local 32% State 28% Federal 7% 37% 29% 25% ARRA 1% 8% 1.5% 7% 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 Operating 38% 28% 25% 18% 29% 12% Federal 39% 6% 35% 14% 4% 40% Capital System Generated Revenue 7% Local 33% State 13% ARRA 10% Federal 40% 50% Source: National Transit Database Report Years 14

Federal Funds Allocated (Billions) Large UZAs (over 200k Population) Nearly Half of 5307 Funds Are Used for Preventive Maintenance Expenses $7 $6.4B Usage of 5307 Funds $6 $5 Other ARRA Funds ARRA 5307 Funds Preventive Maintenan $4 Other Federal JARC, New Freedom, Homeland Security, etc. Capital 52% $3 5309 Funds FGM, New Starts, Bus Discretionary $3.2B Other ARRA ARRA 5307 Funds Other Federal $2 5309 Funds $1 5307 Funds 5307 Preventative Maintenance Funds $- Capital Expenditures 5307 Funds Operating Expenditures Source: National Transit Database Report Year 2010. 15

Federal Funds Allocated (Millions) Federal Funding in Small UZAs (Under 200k Population) $400 Capital Operating $350 $343.9M $269.4M $300 Other ARRA Funds Other ARRA ARRA 5307 Funds $250 $200 ARRA 5307 Funds Other Federal 5307 Preventative Maintenance Funds $150 $100 Other Federal 5309 Funds 5307 Funds $50 $- 5307 Funds Capital Expenditures Operating Expenditures Source: National Transit Database Report Year 2010. 16

58% of the Transit Fleet is in UZAs Over 1 Million Buses 21,929 52,573 Special Service Vehicles* Vans 10,107 8,735 24,723 27,613 Rural Service Regular Vehicles Heavy Rail Vehicles 11,434 23,136 Other Regular Vehicles** Commuter Rail Passenger Cars Self-Propelled Commuter Rail Light Rail Vehicles 2,386 3,504 136 2,626 1,993 125 8,609 Vehicles in Areas of Populations with Under 1 Million 42% Vehicles in Areas with Population of 1 Million or more 58% Commuter Rail Locomotives 719 87 Source: National Transit Database Report Year 2010. 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 Active Vehicles Notes: *Source for "Special Service Vehicles" is the FTA, Fiscal Year Trends Report on the Use of Section 5310 Elderly and Persons with Disabilities Program Funds, 2002. * *"Other Regular Vehicles" includes automated guideway vehicles, automobiles, cable cars, ferryboats, inclinded plane vehicles, jitneys, públicos, taxicabs, and trolleybuses. 17

Annual Motorbus Vehicles Reported to Urban NTD Fixed-Route Bus Emissions Cleaner Since 2002 70,000 60,000 Hybrid Dual Fuel Other* Gasoline 50,000 CNG 40,000 30,000 In 2001, CNG vehicles accounted for 8.7% of all MB vehicles reported to the NTD In 2010, CNG represented 14.4% of all MB vehicles reported to the NTD 20,000 10,000 Diesel Fuel** 0 2002 2003 2004 2006 2005 2007 2008 2009 2010 Data set includes all motorbus vehicles in fixed route service as reported in Urban NTD 2002 to 2010 report years. * Other includes Bunker fuel, Electric battery, Ethanol, Grain additive, Kerosene, Liquefied natural gas (LNG), Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and fuel types reported as "other" in the NTD. 18 ** The diesel category contains bio-diesel and diesel fuel vehicles.

Operating Cost per Vehicle Revenue Hour Operating Cost per Vehicle Revenue Hour by Mode $500 Fixed-Route Bus Service Remains Cheaper Per Vehicle - Hour than Rail Services $450 $400 $350 $300 $250 $480 $200 $393 $150 $100 $50 $0 $246 Automated Guideway Cable Car $160 Inclined Plane $199 $245 Heavy Rail Light Rail Commuter Rail $120 Fixed-Route Bus $64 $61 Demand Response Demand Response Taxi $33 Vanpool $54 Rural Bus- Only Systems $32 Rural DR- Only Systems Source: National Transit Database Report Year 2010. 19

Constant 2010 Dollars Operating Expenses per Vehicle Revenue Hour: 2000 vs. 2010 $600 Fringe benefits have increased faster than inflation for all modes $520 $500 Other $400 $388 Tires & Tubes Fuel & Lube $300 $200 Commuter Rail $116 $163 $179 $198 $227 $251 Commuter Rail Fringe Benefits Salaries & Wages $100 $- $176 Heavy Rail $201 $55 $80 $60 $70 $106 $99 $106 $97 $27 $40 $54 $56 $56 $23 $11 $30 $41 CR 2000 CR 2010 HR 2000 HR 2010 LR 2000 LR 2010 Bus 2000 Bus 2010 DR 2000 DR 2010 $105 $128 $105 Source: National Transit Database Report Years 2000 and 2010. 20

Farebox Recovery Ratio Cost per Hour vs. Farebox Recovery for Heavy and Light Rail Systems 80% Many rail systems have farebox recovery ratios between 20% and 40% and an operating cost per hour of between $200 and $350 70% MTA NYCT BART Data for HR & LR modes, only. 60% WMATA 50% CTA San Diego MTS SEPTA MBTA PATCO 40% 30% 20% 10% Metro Transit (Minneapolis) Houston Metro UTA Tri-Met MARTA St. Louis Metro Denver RTD Sacramento RTD Valley Metro Rail (Phoenix) NORTA Miami-Dade Transit LA Metro MUNI Sound Transit Cleveland RTA CATS (Charlotte) NFTA Tren Urbano MTA (Maryland) Staten Island Railway VTA (San Jose) Port Authority (Pittsburgh) PATH NJ Transit DART 0% $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 $450 $500 Less Expensive Source: National Transit Database Report Year 2010. Operating Cost per Revenue Hour More Expensive 21

Average Fare Average Fare and Costs per Trip for Top 50 Fixed-Route Bus Services $2.00 $1.80 $1.60 $1.40 $1.20 $1.00 $0.80 $0.60 $0.40 $0.20 Colors Indicate Farebox Recovery Ratio Black: >40% Green: 30-39% Blue: 20-29% NJ Transit MTA Bus Co. (NYC) NFTA King County Metro Port Authority (Pittsburgh) Foothill Transit Metro Transit (Minneapolis) Cleveland RTD RTC (Las Vegas) Miami-Dade St. Louis Metro San Diego MTA NYC Transit Denver RTD MTA (Maryland) Milwaukee Tri-Met Pace CTA Omnitrans RIPTA COTA SEPTA Hampton Roads UTA OCTA Phoenix AC Transit MUNI Lynx (Orlando) PSTA(Tampa) WMATA Houston Metro JTA (Jacksonville) CATS(Charlotte) Broward Cnty MARTA MBTA LA Metro Detroit DOT Honolulu Ride-On VIA (San Antonio) Capital Metro (Austin) SWORTA MTA Long Island Bus VTA (San Jose) DART SMART Sound Transit Fixed-Route Bus Systems Ranked by Most Vehicle Revenue Miles 1-10 11-25 $- $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 $7.00 $8.00 26-50 Operating Cost per Trip Average fares cover only 20% - 40% of a bus trip 22

Federal Transit Administration 23

Federal Transit Administration 24

Questions? John D. Giorgis National Transit Database Program Manager Federal Transit Administration US Department of Transportation john.giorgis@dot.gov Federal Transit Administration