EPAC: Oil and Gas Investor Showcase June 10, 2015
Forward Looking Statement Advisories Certain information contained in this presentation constitutes forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. This information relates to future events or the Company's future performance. All information other than information of historical fact is forward-looking information. The use of any of the words "anticipate", "plan", "contemplate", "continue", "estimate", "expect", "intend", "propose", "might", "may", "will", "shall", "project", "should", "could", "would", "believe", "predict", "forecast", "pursue", "potential" and "capable" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking information. This information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking information. No assurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be correct and such forward-looking information should not be unduly relied upon. This information speaks only as of the date of this presentation or, if applicable, as of the date specified in those documents specifically referenced herein. In addition, this presentation may contain forward-looking information attributed to third-party sources. Without limitation of the foregoing, this presentation contains forward-looking information pertaining to the following: the reserve potential of the Company's assets; the anticipated production from the Company's assets and anticipated future cash flows from such assets; the Company's growth strategy and opportunities; the Company's capital exploration and development programs and future capital requirements; the estimated quantity and value of the Company's proved and probable reserves; expectations regarding the ability to raise capital and to continually add to reserves; the Company's estimates of future interest and foreign exchange rates; the Company's environmental considerations; the Company's assumptions regarding commodity prices; the Company's expectations regarding reduction in its operating costs; the timing of commencement of certain of the Company's operations and the level of production anticipated by the Company; the potential for production disruption and constraints; supply and demand fundamentals for crude oil and natural gas; the Company's access to adequate pipeline capacity; the Company's access to third-party infrastructure; the Company's drilling and recompletion plans; the Company's expected capital expenditures; expected debt levels and credit facilities; industry conditions pertaining to the oil and gas industry; the Company's plans for, and results of, exploration and development activities; the planned construction of the Company's gathering, transportation and processing facilities and related infrastructure; the timing for receipt of regulatory approvals; the Company's treatment under governmental regulatory regimes and tax laws; the Company's future general and administrative expenses; and the Company's expectations regarding having adequate human resource staffing. 2
Westbrick Energy Ltd. -Introduction Westbrick is a private company founded in 2011 to capture long term development drilling inventory Drilling inventory must compete to be the lowest cost deliverability to protect returns during volatility in commodity prices Focus on profitability and it should result in growth on a per share basis Key ingredients for long term success: (1% vision 99% alignment) great reservoir rock, focused and contiguous assets, committed team and supportive shareholders Board of Directors Doug Kay (Chairman) Intrepid Resources M. Bruce Chernoff* - Caribou Capital David Rain Caribou Capital Jim Riddell Paramount Resources Ltd Jonathan Smidt - KKR Brandon Freiman - KKR Ken McCagherty* Leadership Team Ken McCagherty President and CEO* Lloyd Heine VP Finance and CFO Tom Collins VP Exploration* Moe Mangat VP Engineering* James O Connor VP Land Michael Hawkings Production Superintendent* * Former team member of the West Energy Ltd. a TSX listed company sold in 2010 3
Westbrick Key Data Summary Current Production 13,000 BOEPD Capable of greater than 18,000 BOEPD 2015 effective decline rate 0% P+P Reserves 61.5 MMBOE at December 31, 2014 Reserves are 74% gas, 6 % light oil and 20% NGL GLJ P+P PV10 -$662 million FDC less than 5 years of Run Rate Cash Flow Drilling inventory - Over 400 net locations (<20% booked) Pembina Deep Basin Land Position Total land - 132,00 Gross, 99,600 Net ha, (Avg. W.I. 75%) Most rights from base Cardium to base Rock Creek Capital Structure Exit Q1, 2015 44.5MM common shares outstanding 78% owned by Kohlberg Kravis and Roberts (KKR) Net debt $ 63MM Bank line $ 120MM Run Rate CF $ 63MM Debt/CF 1:1 EDMONTON Westbrick Area of Operations CALGARY 4
Performance Track Record Annual Production Yearend Reserves CAGR: 179% CAGR: 55% Annual Cashflow Capex and Costs 5
How will we follow the plan in 2015? Overall Business Plan Price drives growth and activity Retain capital allocation flexibility Maintain a strong balance sheet Always keep commitments small 2015 Plan Cashflow Meet Commitments & Enhance Assets Capture and Delineate Assets Grow Production Choke wells to reduce production declines Build infrastructure for sustainable production Capital Allocation Delay drilling to avoid low returns Stay on top of the service cost reductions 16000 14000 12000 History Forecast 8.00 7.00 6.00 Current plan generates 3% growth and Free Cash Flow Buy high quality lands Production (Boe/d) 10000 8000 6000 4000 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 AECO Gas ($/GJ) 2000 1.00 0 0.00 Prod History Prod Forecast Gas Price History Gas Price Forecast 6
Why Deep Basin? Stacked Multi-Zone Sequence Good Rock + Technology = Great Wells Effectively a resource play single section can have numerous locations Conventional plays vertical well control Performance governed by sand quality mapping can find higher productivity Complex stratigraphy numerous opportunities to acquire drilling inventory Local Strengths midstreamer capacity, wells choked (lower declines) 7
Why Pembina Liquid Rich Gas? Top Wells in Canada Pembina Mannville Horizontal Well Production Growth GAS RATE (MMCF/D) Well Count 1,000 TOU VET Westbrick PEY BXE BNP Gas Rate (MMCF/D) & Well Count 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 2008-01 2008-06 2008-11 2009-04 2009-09 2010-02 2010-07 2010-12 2011-05 2011-10 2012-03 2012-08 2013-01 2013-06 2013-11 2014-04 2014-09 2015-02 Team knows the area Westbrick Entry Extensive deep well control Multiple sands present Southern end of Deep Basin trend All major players are present Significant production growth in the last 5 years High impact liquid rich gas wells have been drilled in the area Projects are still economic at current commodity prices Year round access and legacy infrastructure 8
Diversified Asset Portfolio Liquids Rich Gas and Light Oil Gas Play -WTI Oil Fixed at US$60/Bbl Oil Play -Gas Fixed at CDN$2.50/GJ Gas Play Oil Play IRR (%) 160% 140% 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 2 2.25 2.5 2.75 3 3.25 3.5 3.75 4 CDN $ /GJ IRR (%) 160% 140% 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% -20% 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 WTI US$/Bbl Drilling inventory generates positive rate of return at these prices Returns are leveraged to recovery in either commodity price Flexibility to allocate capital to take advantage of either commodity Custom built asset base with 35 deals (all internally generated) and numerous crown land sales Continue to capture opportunities that complement our existing inventory 9
Efficient Shareholder Returns Never Ending Objective Well Length and Frac Stages Average D&C Cost and Yearly CAPEX Stages Average Depth D&C Cost per Stage CAPEX Average MD (Meters) 4,100 4,000 3,900 3,800 3,700 3,600 3,500 2012 2013 2014 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 # of Frac Stages Average D&C cost per Stage 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000-2012 2013 2014 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 CAPEX (MM$) WBE Peer Group Execution enhances shareholder returns Drill and Complete costs per stage have been reduced by 50% Our operating strategy requires an appropriate comparative metric Production increase per unit capital is a direct analog for returns and creates focus for the team Peer Group: AAV,CQE,KEL,PNE,BXE,CR,PPY,TOU,RTK,CKE,NVA,SRX,BIR,DEE,PEY 10
Corporate Reserves Performance Westbrick * FD&A reflects the underlying asset quality FD&A strongly dependent on liquid percentage of the reserves Recycle Ratio is the normalizing performance comparison variable Recycle Ratio captures the full cycle of turning reserves to production and cash flow WBE recycle ratio highest of the comparable group FD&A $/BOE 1Yr P+P FD&A inc FDC 30 25 20 Peer Group 15 10 5 0 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% % LIQUIDS * RECYCLE RATIO Trailing Recycle Ratio vs % Liquids * 3.0 2.8 2.6 WBE 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% % LIQUIDS * 2015 Reserves Comparison: Peters and Co Mar 31, 2015 Peer Group: CQE,TOU,SRX,DEE,PMT,PEY,BIR,RTK,NVA,BXE 11
Why Westbrick in the Current Environment? 1. Capital Efficiency proven resource and execution program Low supply cost resource 2. Sustainable production base for 13,000 15,000 BOEPD Cashflow, production and reserves Access to capital 3. Strong, focused and operated land base High quality geological setting Disciplined capital program and rate of return hurdles Over 20 years of development drilling inventory 4. Platform that is adaptable to any business model Stand alone: growth or dividend model Combined as an asset in a larger entity 12
Corporate Information Westbrick Energy Ltd. Suite 2500 255 5 th Ave SW Calgary Alberta T2P 3G6 Contacts Ken McCagherty President & CEO (587) 293 4660 mccagherty@westbrick.ca Fax: (403) 232 8815 Lloyd Heine VP Finance & CFO (587) 293 4679 lheine@westbrick.ca Fax: (403) 232 8815 Corporate Information Banker - National Bank of Canada Evaluation Engineers - GLJ Petroleum Consultants Legal Counsel - McCarthy Tetrault LLP Auditors - KPMG LLP 13