The State of North Dakota



Similar documents
TESTIMONY BEFORE THE INTERIM HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS AUGUST 28, 2014

Health Information Exchange in Minnesota & North Dakota

Enhancing the State s Healthcare Landscape through Trusted Information Exchange. Category: Digital Government: Government to Business

HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT PROGRAM NORTH DAKOTA S STRATEGIC AND OPERATIONAL 2013 PLAN UPDATE

InteliChart. Putting the Meaningful in Meaningful Use. Meeting current criteria while preparing for the future

Canada Health Infoway

Enabling Patients Decision Making Power: A Meaningful Use Outcome. Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

HIT. Lynette Dickson ND Center for Rural Health

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Meaningful Use 2015 and beyond. Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist

HL7 and Meaningful Use

Connecting California: Building a Statewide Health Information Exchange Utility

Meaningful Use Updates. HIT Summit September 19, 2015

Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use Measures

Meaningful Use. Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

MEETING MEANINGFUL USE IN MICROMD -STAGE TWO- Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Dentists as Eligible Professionals. Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator

Meaningful Use and Lab Related Requirements

Meaningful Use in 2015 and Beyond Changes for Stage 2

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2015 Tipsheet

How To Qualify For EHR Stimulus Funds Under

Indiana Council of Community Mental Health Centers. October 14, 2013

Health Information Exchange in NYS

Meaningful Use. Goals and Principles

Meaningful Use Updates Stage 2 and 3. Julia Moore, Business Analyst SMC Partners, LLC July 8, 2015

Achieving Meaningful Use in Private Practice. A close examination of Stage 2 requirements

Adopting an EHR & Meaningful Use

WISHIN Comments Regarding CMS EHR Incentives Proposed Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives

Eligible Professionals please see the document: MEDITECH Prepares You for Stage 2 of Meaningful Use: Eligible Professionals.

Meaningful Use Final Rule Update. Patti Kritzberger, RHIT, CHPS Tracey Regimbal, RHIT HIT-Quality Improvement Specialists

E-Health and Health Information Exchange in Minnesota WEDI Webinar January 16, 2014

How Real-Time Data Integration is Changing the Face of Healthcare IT

<your organization logo> Make the Connection to <your organization name>

CMS Proposed Electronic Health Record Incentive Program For Physicians

ARRA HITECH Meaningful Use Objectives & Implications to Public Health Lab

Using e-health: EHRs, HIE and the Minnesota Accountable Health Model

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 Summary of Proposed Rule (EP)

ehealth and Health Information Exchange in Minnesota

State Grants for Health Information Exchange

Evaluating Options for the Integration of Electronic Medical Records With the Vermont Prescription Monitoring System

Meaningful Use 2014: Stage 2 MU Overview. Scott A. Jens, OD, FAAO October 16, 2013

Extending HIS to Support Meaningful Use. October 21, 2010

Modified Stage 2 Final Rule

MEDICFUSION / HERFERT. MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 1 and 2 ATTESTATION GUIDE 2015

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Deciphered

Meaningful Use and Public Health

HCCN Meaningful Use Review. October 7 th, 2015 Louisiana Public Health Institute Kelly Maggiore Jack Millaway

How To Write A Grant For A Health Information Technology Program

State of New Hampshire. Phase 3 Converging on Solutions discussion deck Business and Technical Operations Workgroup. July 20, 2010

REQUIREMENTS GUIDE: How to Qualify for EHR Stimulus Funds under ARRA

Contact: Barbara J Stout RN, BSC Implementation Specialist University of Kentucky Regional Extension Center

Meaningful Use Stage 2: Summary of Proposed Rule for Eligible Professionals (EPs) Wyatt Packer HIT Regional Extension Center (REC) HealthInsight

Meaningful Use Stage 1:

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE FOR ELIGIBLE HOSPITALS AND CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITALS (CAHS)

Where to Begin? Auditing the Current EHR System

MEANINGFUL USE Stages 1 & 2

June 15, 2015 VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION

APPENDIX A: OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES FOR 2015 THROUGH 2017 (MODIFIED STAGE 2) EP Objectives and Measures

The State of North Dakota

Breaking the Code to Interoperability

The State of North Dakota. proudly submits to the NASCIO Awards Committee. Governor s Office Executive Order

Meaningful Use Update

Stage 2 Meaningful Use What the Future Holds. Lindsey Wiley, MHA HIT Manager Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

Making It Work: Shifting the Rural Health Balance Through Electronic Health Record Initiatives

Attesting for Meaningful Use Stage 2 in 2014 Customer Help Guide

S TA G E 2 M O D I F I C AT I O N S. October 2015

STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE CORE AND MENU MEASURES FOR ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONALS

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

5 Steps to Success with Stage 2 Meaningful Use

Health Care February 28, CMS Issues Proposed Rule on Stage 2 Meaningful Use,

Re: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017; Proposed Rule

Navigating the Trends in Health Care Today. MEDITECH Solutions for Meaningful Use and Interoperability

Proposed Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria

Inpatient EHR. Solution Snapshot. The right choice for your patients, your practitioners, and your bottom line SOLUTIONS DESIGNED TO FIT

The Future of Meaningful Use

Incentives to Accelerate EHR Adoption

HealtheConnections RHIO Transitioning HIE Platform to Mirth FAQ

OPTIMIZING THE USE OF YOUR ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD. A collaborative training offered by Highmark and the Pittsburgh Regional Health Initiative

Selecting Your Stage 1 Meaningful Use MENU Objectives

Medweb Telemedicine 667 Folsom Street, San Francisco, CA Phone: Fax:

EMR and ehr Together for patients and providers. ehealth Conference October 3-4, 2014

A Guide to Understanding and Qualifying for Meaningful Use Incentives

HIE, RHIOs and EHR Interoperability The Journey to Meaningful Use, Interoperable Health Care Delivery and Improved Quality of Care

EHR Incentive Program Updates. Jason Felts, MS HIT Practice Advisor

Health Information Exchange. Scalable and Affordable

T h e M A RY L A ND HEALTH CARE COMMISSION

Stage 2 Final Rule Overview: Updates to Stage 1 and New Stage 2 Requirements

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Presenter: Linda Wise, EMR Training Specialist

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Requirements Primer

1. Introduction - Nevada E-Health Survey

Achieving meaningful use of healthcare information technology

West Virginia Information Technology Summit. November 4, 2009

The Meaningful Use Stage 2 Final Rule: Overview and Outlook

AND STATE OF DEPARTMENT

The now tips, the how tools, and the must timing for your MU path in 2014.

Reporting Period: For Stage 2, the reporting period must be the entire Federal Fiscal Year.

The KHIE ConnectionPartnering to Improve Patient Health Outcomes

Stage 2 of Meaningful Use Summary of Proposed Rule

Transcription:

The State of North Dakota Title: Category: North Dakota Health Information Network Cross Boundary Collaboration and Partnerships Project Initiation: January 2012 Project Completion: June 2014 Contact: Cliff Heyne cdheyne@nd.gov 701-328-1101

Executive Summary In 2009, North Dakota was in a similar position as other states, a low electronic health records (EHR) adoption rate, cumbersome and inefficient method of sharing information among medical providers, government, and consumers, and new meaningful use requirements all posed problems to providing quality healthcare to citizens. The solution was the North Dakota Health Information Network (NDHIN). The NDHIN is a fully functioning, sustainable health information network that securely connects disparate Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems and is accessible by providers, physicians, hospitals, other health care organizations, and consumers. Implementing the NDHIN required two things to happen. First, providers needed to acquire, install, and utilize EHR systems. Second, a system was needed that would allow providers to exchange information securely and electronically. The project was launched in 2011 and by March 5, 2014 the system was live. As of April 2015, the NDHIN system had 694,000 unique patient records or about 94 percent of North Dakota s population. And according to the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), North Dakota was reported to have the highest percentage of office-based physicians in 2013 that met the criteria for a basic EHR system (84%). At the time, the national average was 48%. This project required a monumental statewide collaboration of state agencies, healthcare providers, plans, vendor partners and many healthcare associations and organizations. It has also benefited a wide range stakeholders. For example, provides can reduce patient intake time and meet a meaningful use requirement. Patients can access information through a patient portal and experience smoother transitions among healthcare facilities and through the continuum of care. And, state government can make informed decisions because North Dakota Department of Health registries are updated simultaneously with updates in EHR systems. These are some of benefits yielded from the project and demonstrate why this project was significant. The NDHIN truly demonstrates that States Run on IT, as was acknowledged by North Dakota Governor Jack Dalrymple s statement that EHRs and the NDHIN are an important part of strengthening the quality and accessibility of healthcare in our state. 1

Business Problem and Solution Problem Before this project, North Dakota, like other states, had providers in various stages of electronic healthcare records (EHR) adoption with many still using paper processes. And even for those providers that were utilizing some form of an EHR system, other than for some lab reporting, systems were not interoperable. As a result, information was essentially in silos that were inaccessible by other providers. The exchange of information required staff to physically copy and mail or fax files among medical facilities. Unless requested in advance, the information was not available at the time of treatment. These limitations created many problems within North Dakota s healthcare system. For example, if a patient was in a car accident and taken to the emergency room of a hospital they had not previously been to, the treating provider would have no medical record for the patient. The provider may be missing critical patient information, such as allergies, previous surgeries, or other pre-existing conditions that could dramatically affect care. Beyond emergency situations, incomplete information could cause duplicate treatments if providers weren t aware a patient had already received certain care. In other instances, it may result in a trip back to the provider once the information is obtained. In a rural state like North Dakota, this could be a lengthy trip. These few examples demonstrate the immense affects a low EHR adoption rate and lack of connectedness among EHR systems caused in North Dakota. North Dakota healthcare providers needed faster and easier sharing of medical records to improve coordination of patient care, reduce duplicate treatments, and avoid mistakes. In addition to the above mentioned problems, the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009 required medical providers to meet new Meaningful Use requirements, which includes the capability to view, download, and transmit health care data, and report electronically to the Health Department. Solution To address the problems North Dakota was facing, the Health Information Technology Advisory Committee (HITAC) and the ND Information Technology Department (ITD), designed and implemented the ND Health Information Network (NDHIN), a fully functioning, sustainable health information network to securely connect the disparate EHR systems and provide access by qualified organizations representing providers, physicians, hospitals, other health care organizations, and consumers. 2

The primary business requirement for the project was to securely connect the EHR systems of North Dakota healthcare providers, healthcare plans, and other participants to improve healthcare quality, patient safety, and overall efficiency of healthcare and public health services in North Dakota. This concept is epitomized in the NDHIN s vision Quality Healthcare for all North Dakotan s anywhere, anytime. How NDHIN Works The NDHIN works by connecting hospital and provider electronic health record systems through secure interfaces. These interfaces include: admission, discharge and transfer; laboratory and radiology results; medical document management; immunization and continuity of care document feeds. These feeds are consolidated from all data sources and are then displayed in a Patient Summary when a patient is queried by an authorized user, or are submitted to the Department of Health automatically. Governance and Project Management North Dakota established a Health Information Technology Advisory Committee (HITAC) in 2009 to facilitate the adoption and use of health information technology and exchange to improve healthcare quality, patient safety and overall efficiency of healthcare and public health services in North Dakota. This committee provided oversight and guidance for the NDHIN project. This project followed the Project Management Institute s PMBOK project management methods and comprehensive project management and procurement standards established by the State of North Dakota. Additionally, a statewide communication plan was implemented, which included provider and consumer education material, training programs, newsletters, project updates, user group meetings, and tradeshows participation. Request for Proposal and Project Timeline In late 2010, the HITAC released a request for proposal (RFP). After a comprehensive procurement process, a contract was signed with Axolotl/OptumInsight in late 2011. The implementation of the NDHIN began with deploying Direct secure messaging 3

functionality in 2012. However, in February 2013, before the query-based services were implemented, the contract with Axolotl/OptumInsight was mutually terminated. Despite this setback, the team persisted. An informal RFP for the implementation of Direct and Query-based services was then released to the top two remaining vendors from the original procurement process. In March 2013, the contract was awarded to Orion Health and negotiations were completed. In May 2013, a major kickoff event was held for all stakeholders in Bismarck. Over the next 9 months, an astounding amount of work was accomplished by the small NDHIN/ Orion Health team and healthcare organizations across North Dakota. By March 5, 2014 the system was live. 140 organizations had signed agreements with the NDHIN, 35 of which were connected or in the process of connecting to the NDHIN, and 680 authorized clinical users were set up for NDHIN Direct Secure Messaging. The actual cost of the project was $5,129,561.85, which was 5.6% under the baseline budget of $5,437,277.41. Significance Gubernatorial alignment North Dakota Governor Jack Dalrymple stated the following in a March 2014 press release, By strengthening the quality and accessibility of healthcare in our state, we enhance the livability of our communities and the quality of life of our people. Sharing electronic health records is an important part of those efforts, enhancing patient care while reducing healthcare costs. These goals also align with NASCIO s State CIO Priorities for 2014, specifically in the field of healthcare. Collaboration among Stakeholders Unprecedented collaboration was achieved amongst a wide range of stakeholders. By building consensus, trust was established between the stakeholders and a common statewide plan was developed, agreed upon, and implemented. Below is a table showing many of the organizations that worked together to complete this project. Government Private Sector ND Health IT Advisory Committee ND Association of Home Care ND Chiropractic Association ND Department of Health ND Medical Association ND Board of Pharmacy ND Department of Human Services Regional Extension Assistance Center for ND State Association of County and City Health Health IT Officials ND Division of Emergency ND Long Term Care Medical Services and Trauma Association ND Legislature ND Hospital Association AARP Hospital and Provider Representation 4

ND Health Information Network participants ND Governor s Office ND Pharmacists Association NDHIN Team ND Optometric Association ND Dental Association Quality Health Associates of ND Benefit of the Project Many individual and organizations have benefited from this project, namely healthcare providers, patients, and government. Primary Benefits to Healthcare Providers EHR Adoption reduces patient intake time and allows patient information to be readily available Direct secure messaging enables providers to securely exchange protected health information in formats that can be easily incorporated into EHRs, which previously was not possible. It also allows providers to meet a meaningful use requirement Clinical Portals improve patient care by making accessible the most recent updates to medical records Integration with the Department of Health s Immunization Registry and Public Health Reporting for ELR and Syndromic Surveillance allows simultaneously registry updates and eliminate dual data entry A loan program established by the State has allowed 25 providers to acquire EHR systems that otherwise may not have afforded an EHR system or participate in the NDHIN. To date, over $12.5 million dollars have been loaned to providers The ND Prescription Drug Monitoring Program was connected to the NDHIN, allowing providers quick access to vital treatment information The NDHIN became a Health Information Service Provider (HISP), which allows providers access to XDR and web based services to exchange information securely and efficiently Primary Benefits to Patients and Citizens of North Dakota Faster and easier coordination of patient information among medical facilities, which has many benefits, such as: minimizing test duplication, smoother transitions among healthcare facilities and through the continuum of care, better emergency room preparedness, and complete information available during the time of treatment Empowers a patient s doctor to make more informed decisions Avoids loss of key pieces of patient health records during unexpected events and disasters The Patient Portal includes a process for patients to include their Advance Care Directives. This is subsequently available to providers participating in the NDHIN Primary Benefits to local, state, and federal government Registries are updated simultaneously with updates in EHR systems improving information for decision making and disease management 5

Reducing duplicate testing reduces costs to payers, such as Medicare, Medicaid and government provided employee healthcare Timely and more complete information is available for syndromic surveillance Direct secure messaging has allowed Medicaid payers to efficiently provide claims payment information to providers using a secure email process Measurements As of June 2014, the NDHIN system had 383,000 unique patient records, or about 52 percent of North Dakota s population. By April 2015, it had 694,000 records or about 94 percent of North Dakota s population. According to the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), North Dakota was reported to have the highest percentage of office-based physicians in 2013 that met the criteria for a basic EHR system (84%). The national average is 48%. The following section outlines the defined Project Objectives that were met: OBJECTIVE: Increase the number of community pharmacies e-prescribing to 95% and the physicians electronically routing prescriptions to 50% by December 31, 2013. RESULT: For the month of December 2013, 168 of 177 (95%) community pharmacies were activated with Surescripts and 167 (94%) received e-prescribing transactions. Based upon Surescripts latest report available, North Dakota had 98% of physicians routing prescriptions electronically as of December 2012. OBJECTIVE: Develop the capability of the reference labs that handle 95% of the reference lab work to exchange bi-directional data by March 14, 2014. RESULT: As of March 14, 2014, reference labs can exchange lab requests and results using Direct and query based services using health language 7 transactions. OBJECTIVE: Increase the exchange of Patient Care Summaries by ensure providers have at least one method to securely, electronically exchange patient care summaries RESULT: Providers can share patient care summaries securely using Direct. OBJECTIVE: Increase the number of practice-based electronic immunization transactions reported to the North Dakota Immunization Information System (NDIIS) to at least 50% of all reported transactions. RESULT: From September 1 through December 31, 2013, the average number of practice-based electronic immunization transactions reported to the NDIIS represented 56.5 percent of all transactions. OBJECTIVE: Within six months (of Phase 1 completion), identify a process to refer smokers to the ND Tobacco Quitline using an automated approach and identify process for Quitline to be able to respond back to providers with progress reports on referred smokers. RESULT: Direct is set up to be used by the Quitline for referrals. 6