Phasing Out Coal Generation in Colorado Ron Davis Principal Economist Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies Public Utilities Commission 1560 Broadway, Suite 250 Denver, CO 80202 P 303.894.2883 F 303.869.0333 Email: ronald.davis@dora.state.co.us d
Clean Air Act (CAA) Requirements Colorado and other states late in submitting to the Federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) a plan for reducing emissions that contribute to regional haze State Implementation Plan (SIP) Primary focus on NOx emissions Coal plants in Colorado do not have adequate NOx controls The Denver/Metro area struggles to keep ozone levels within the standards set by the EPA New stricter ozone standards likely to be approved An SIP for ozone likely to seek further NOx emission reductions Other polluters and pollutants being addressed by EPA Carbon dioxide emissions also addressed under CAA 1
Legislative Response Various interests converged at the Colorado General Assembly to address emerging emission i reduction requirements Utilities with coal plants facing stricter EPA regulations Plants generally aging facilities nearing the end of their useful lives Natural gas producers eager to sell their product in a low market price environment State legislators and air quality regulators seeking to meet EPA requirements and prevent federal action Environmental groups, doctors, and public health officials seeking cleaner air City and county governments concerned about local economic impacts Unhappy neighbors of the plants 2
House Bill 10-1365 1365 Clean Air Clean Jobs Act Signed into law on April 9, 2010 Public Service required to submit an emission reduction plan by August 15, 2010 At least 900 MW of coal-fired generation Three options for each plant : emission controls, retirement/replacement, and conversion from coal to natural gas All actions implemented by December 31, 2017 Plan must be reviewed by Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) and approved by the Air Quality Control Commission (AQCC) o Incorporation into SIP for regional haze o Plan must meet reasonably foreseeable requirements of the CAA Commission must issue decision by December 15, 2010 3
House Bill 10-1365 1365 (continued) Commission obligated to consider nine factors: 1) 70-80% reduction in NOx emissions 2) CDPHE determination of emissions from replacement capacity 3) Reductions in other emissions 4) Use of existing natural gas-fired facilities 5) Ability of Public Service to meet state and federal clean energy requirements (Renewable Energy Standard) and reliance on energy efficiency or other low-emitting resources 6) Promotion of Colorado economic development 7) Reliable electric service 8) Protection from future cost increases associated with reasonably foreseeable emission reduction requirements 9) Costs of plan result in reasonable rate impacts 4
Public Service s Plan Public Service initially submitted nine scenarios on August 13, 2010 Various combinations of coal plant retirements/replacements, emission controls, and/or fuel conversions to natural gas One scenario a preferred plan (Scenario 6.2E) Most other plans suggested by stakeholders or required by statute Public Service s support for Scenario 6.2E challenged by parties and the Commission because it would not be fully implemented by December 31, 2017 Public Service presented additional scenarios on October 25, 2010 Fuel switching an approach to make earlier scenarios compliant with 2017 deadline Change in preferred scenario (Scenario 5B) Another scenario a close second choice (Scenario 6.2J) 5
Coal Plants and Options Year of Initial End of Useful Controls 4 End of Useful Coal Plant Unit MW Operation Life 1 Benchmark 1.0 Life Post Controls Notes Cherokee 1 107 1957 2017 SNCR (2014) 6 2024 Coal contracts end in 2012 (Uintah) RP Unit Coal transportation contracts end 2011 2 106 1959 2019 SNCR (2014) 6 2024 Rail car lease expires 3/2016 (265 cars) RP Unit Low NO x burners on units 1,3, 4 3 152 1962 2022 SCR (2017) 7 2032 Valmont 4 5 352 186 1968 1964 2028 2024 RP Unit SCR (2016) 7 BART Unit SCR (2015) 7 2031 2030 Coal contracts end in 2012 (Uintah) BART Unit Coal transportation contracts end 2011 Rail car lease expires 3/2016 (110 cars) Low NO x burners on unit Pawnee 1 505 1981 2041 SCR (2014) 7 2041 Coal contracts end in 2013 (PRB) BART Unit 5 Coal transportation contracts end 2020 Rail car lease expires 11/2016 (254 cars) Low NO x burners on unit Arapahoe 3 45 1951 2012 Retire (2014) N/A Coal contracts end in 2012 (PRB) Coal transportation contracts end 2013 Rail car lease expires 6/2015 (130 cars) 4 111 1955 2012 Retire (2014) N/A Low NO x burners on unit 4 Hayden 2 1 139 1965 2025 SCR (2015) 7 2030 Coal contracts end in 2011 (Uintah) BART Unit Coal transportation contracts end 2011 2 98 1976 2036 SCR (2016) 7 2036 Low NO x burners on both units BART Unit (1) From 2009 Depreciation Study (Docket No. 09AL-299E) (2) Includes only Public Service s share (75.5% of unit 1 and 37.4% of unit 2) (4) Regional Haze SIP: RP Unit = Reasonable Progress ; BART = Best Available Retrofit Technology (5) BART for both Regional Haze and future Ozone SIP; spray dry absorption system for flue gas desulfurization required for SO 2 reductions to meet regional haze SIP (6) SCR not feasible (air heater design and available space); SNCR expected to achieve 30% NO x reduction; retire after 10 years post SNCR installation (7) Plant life extended 15 years after installation of SCR:
Scenario 5B 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Existing Coal Plant Cherokee 1 Retire Cherokee 2 Retire SC Cherokee 3 Retire Cherokee 4 SCR Arapahoe 3 Retire SC Arapahoe 4 Gas Valmont 5 Retire Hayden 1 SCR Hayden 2 SCR Pawnee SCR/LSD Replacement 2 X 1 Cherokee On-Line 1 X 1 Cherokee Peaker Cherokee IPP Re-ups NO x (2018) -85% CO 2 (2020) -24% SC = Synchronous Condenser SCR = Selective Catalytic Reduction Control Gas = Fuel Switch from Coal to Gas LSD = Lime Spray Dryer
Participating Stakeholders Traditional interests Natural Gas interests Commission Staff Chesapeake Energy, Noble Office of Consumer Council Energy, and EnCana Governor s Energy Office Anadarko Customers s Independent Power Producers o Wal-Mart o Climax Molybdenum Mine Colorado Independent Energy Association o CF&I Steel Thermo Power o Colorado Energy Consumers Coal mining interests Peabody Energy Colorado Mining Association American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity Environmental interests Western Resource Advocates 8 Southwest Generation Interwest Energy Alliance Local Governments Weld County Northwest Colorado Denver Boulder Several Others
Procedural Challenges So many parties so little time Pre-filing activity: May 7, 2010 August 12, 2010 Plan filing: August 13, 2010 Pre-filed testimony: 16 Company witnesses 50 + Intervenor witnesses Public hearings: August 30, 2010 September 23, 2010 Evidentiary hearings: October 21 November 3 November 18-20 Deliberations: December 6, 8 and 9, 2010 Decision No. C10-1328: December 15, 2010 Filing deficiencies, confidential information, modeling limits Arguments regarding due process and Commissioner impartiality 9
Issues Projected fuel costs Costs and rate impacts Coal Natural gas Environmental regulation Clean Air Act requirements Carbon regulation Gasproduction oducto regulation eguato System reliability Generation located near load Health benefits Economic impacts Denver/Metro Gas producing communities Coal producing communities Competitive procurement and existing generation assets Access to information
Reduction in Coal-Fired Generation 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 1.0 5B 6E FS 6.2J 7E IPP2 50,000 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 11
Reduction in Carbon Emissions 35,000 33,000 31,000 29,000 27,000 25,000 23,000 1.0 5B 6E FS 7E 6.2J IPP2 21,000 19,000 17,000 15,000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 12
Reductions in NOx Emissions 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 1.0 5B 6E FS 6.2J 15,000 7E IPP2 10,000 5,000 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 13
Increase in Natural Gas Usage New 1 X 1 Gas CC Online 120,000 100,000 Fuel Switch Cherokee 3 and 4 80,000 Gbtu 60,000 40,000 20,000 Fuel Switch Valmont 5 Arapahoe 4 on Gas New 2 X 1 Gas CC Online Cherokee 3 and Valmont 5 Retire; Cherokee 4 on Gas/Retires 1.0 5B 6E FS 6.2J 7E IPP2 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Expected Impact on Rates 16.00 15.00 14.00 13.00 12.00 11.00 1.0 5B 6E FS 6.2J 7E IPP2 ERP 10.00 9.00 8.00 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 15
Decision No. C10-1328 1328 Commission modified Public Service s preferred plan (Scenario 5B) such that it most closely resembles Scenario 6E FS Retirement of Arapahoe 3, Cherokee 1, 2, and 3 and Valmont 5 Fuel switching at Arapahoe 4 and Cherokee 4 Controls at Pawnee and Hayden Public Service s proposed rate rider rejected Future filings required to recover costs associated with the plan Deferred accounting allowed for accelerated depreciation and removal expenses
Next Steps AQCC adopted regional haze SIP that includes the Company s emissions reduction plan Consideration by General Assembly Consideration by EPA Applications for Rehearing, Reargument, or Reconsideration Public Service: cost recovery and deadline flexibility Coal interests: due processes and reduction in coal usage Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCNs) Plant retirements: decommissioning costs Net plants: cost reviews Emissions controls: cost reviews 2011 Electric Resource Plan due October 31, 2011 Change in Annual Output 17