EXHIBIT A LOCATION MAP AND LAND USE INFORMATION



Similar documents
APPENDIX B. Agency Correspondence

Natural Resource-Based Planning*

Conducting a Land Use Inventory

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY. Staff: Claudette Grant

ELEMENT 4 - FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

Texas Motor Speedway Area Master Plan January 2009 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE

Application No.: Steve Rush, representing Rocky Mountain Power Rocky Mountain Power Project Location: approximately 1600 N E.

Rural Residential Buildable Lands Inventory

4. Priority Areas of Conservation

TH 23 Access Management Study Richmond to Paynesville

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING COMPONENT 1 EXCEPTION TO THE REQUIREMENT TO REVISE THE OFFICIAL PLAN

21.03 SETTLEMENT AND HOUSING

Salt River Project Ten Year Plan Projects

Village of Spring Valley Comprehensive Plan

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SCREENING QUESTIONS

Public Worksessions - A Summary of the New York City Zoning and Planning Study

IOWA STATE REVOLVING FUND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION. To: All Interested Citizens, Government Agencies, and Public Groups

SPECIAL USE PERMIT JCSA Groundwater Treatment Facility Staff Report for the November 5, 2001, Planning Commission Public Hearing

TABLE OF CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION...1 Purpose of a Comprehensive Plan...1 McKenzie County Comprehensive Plan...1 Definitions...2 Goal...2 Vision...

PART 3. Assessment Procedures. CHAPTER 4 New Construction Valuation Property Tax Levy Limit

3.1.8 Utilities and Service Systems

DOÑA ANA COUNTY DESIGN STORM CRITERIA GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL SITES. Run-off Analysis Methods

BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY

Chapter 7 ZONING PLAN

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Plan

If you require assistance in obtaining access to the presentations or have questions regarding the or Glenn Young at (916)

Cellular Antenna Proposal Form

THREE MILE PLAN/URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT

VI. UTILITIES & PUBLIC SERVICES

New York Long Lake Land Dispute Settlement Amendment, Proposal 4 (2013)

AGENDA LARIMER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Wednesday, April 20, 2016/6:30 P.M./Commissioners' Hearing Room

Arizona 1. Dependent Public School Systems (14) Arizona ranks 39th among the states in number of local governments, with 639 as of June 2002.

3 September 9, 2015 Public Hearing

KRUGER ENERGY CHATHAM WIND PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING REPORT / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT. Appendix E. Environmental Noise Impact Assessment

SOLAR POWER IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY MARKETS AND DEVELOPMENT TRENDS

COUNTY OF ELBERT. 18 September, 2014 For the Planning Commission meeting of 25 September, 2014 ELBERT COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

First American Title Insurance Company

SECTION 5.15 ELECTRICITY AND NATURAL GAS

2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey Summary Results

9.0 Alta Vista/Faircrest Heights/Riverview Park (Key Principles)

Mine Plan of Operations Reclamation Bond Checklist

Multiple Species Conservation Program County of San Diego. A Case Study in Environmental Planning & The Economic Value of Open Space

Draft Goals and Objectives Wadena Comprehensive Plan City of Wadena, Minnesota. Land Use Goals:

Definitions. For the purposes of this rule chapter the following definitions shall apply unless the context clearly shows otherwise:

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda - Public Hearing Item

COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program

Koser Field. 7th St SE 2.25

K A N S A S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A RECLAMATION FACILITY. 1. Applicant's Name

Mapping Application for Resource Planning

DESIGN ASSISTANCE APPLICATION

PROPOSAL FOR HOUSTON COUNTY BAN ON SILICA SAND MINING / PROCESSING ACTIVITY. Introduction and Assumptions

Special Publication SJ2004-SP24 East Central Florida Water Supply Initiative St. Johns River Water Supply Project

TEXT AMENDMENT SUMMARY INFORMATION

ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT HABITAT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM HABITAT ENHANCEMENT AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL PROJECT INFORMATION

Site Alternative Deliverability Report. SALT 034 Ty Nant, Groesffordd Resubmission: Deliverable. Local Development Plan

Short-term. Action items that fall into this category need to take place over the next one to two years.

WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR. (NAME of PROPERTY or MANAGED AREA) (TOWN or COUNTY, STATE) (TIME PERIOD; e.g )

Public Land Survey System - Definition

Wausau and Marathon County Parks, Recreation, and Forestry Department Forestry Division 2015 Work Plan

MINERALS AND ASSOCIATED WASTE APPLICATIONS APPLICATION FORM

Corridor Goals and Objectives

Proposed Terms of Reference for EIA studies

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUMMARY OF ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS

Pima Regional Remote Sensing Program

Minnesota Public Utilities Commission Staff Briefing Papers

RESTRICTING GROUNDWATER WITHDRAWALS TO PROTECT WATER RESOURCES: ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT

4.6 GEOLOGIC AND SEISMIC HAZARDS

Laws and Regulatory Requirements to Consider Before You Build a Pond

SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION

STEAMBOAT LAKE WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT PETITION FOR AMENDMENT TO SERVICE PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS. SECTION DESCRIPTION Page

Utah State General Records Retention Schedule SCHEDULE 1 GEOSPATIAL DATA SETS

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LOMPOC AREA

How To Improve Service In Arundel

March 17, Dear Mr. Sullins:

PIPELINE ROUTING PERMIT. For A NATURAL GAS PIPELINE DAKOTA AND RAMSEY COUNTIES ISSUED TO NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY D/B/A XCEL ENERGY

Using Aerial Photography to Measure Habitat Changes. Method

HARDWICK TOWNSHIP WARREN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

Conservation Tax Credit Regulations Chapter A-1 RULES OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CHAPTER

ADMINISTRATIVE LAND SPLIT APPLICATION

TOWN OF VINALHAVEN LAND USE ORDINANCE SECTION 19 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES

Kings Road, Beith. Development Brief. Part 1: Site Specific Information

Adopted 9/23/98 CHATTAHOOCHEE CORRIDOR PLAN. The goals of the Chattahoochee Corridor Plan (hereinafter also referred to as the Plan ) are:

APPENDIX F ACCESS MANAGEMENT PLAN STATEMENT OF WORK

EPCOR Distribution & Transmission Inc.

TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF NORTH SALEM WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK LOCAL LAW # OF THE YEAR 2012

September Sponsored by: John H. Chafee Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission Woonsocket, RI

Restoration. a brief look at

SECTION ONE CHAPTER 2: A LAND USE PROFILE OF MANCHESTER

Chapter 5. Transportation. Decatur County Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Goals and Objectives. Goal. Objectives. Goal.

Advice can also be sought from specific specialist officers in the Council.

(3) CATEGORY III means a permanent heliport facility. (4) COMMISSION means the City of Austin Airport Advisory Commission.

Submitted Electronically via erulemaking Portal to FWS-R5-ES

Roseman Technology Site *Caroline County, Virginia 110 Acres Seconds off Interstate 95

Land Use and Zoning. Land Use Within the Port Madison Indian Reservation

Water District Review

King Fire Restoration Project, Eldorado National Forest, Placer and El Dorado Counties, Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

CHAPTER 9 DEFICIENCY PLANS

Transcription:

EXHIBIT A LOCATION MAP AND LAND USE INFORMATION In accordance with Arizona Corporation Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure R14-3-219, Applicant provides the following location maps and land use information: 1. Where commercially available, a topographic map, 1:250,000 scale, showing the proposed plant site and the adjacent area within 20 miles thereof. If application is made for alternative plant sites, all sites may be shown on the same map, if practicable, designated by applicant s order of preference. 2. Where commercially available, a topographic map, 1:62,500 scale, of each proposed plant site, showing the area within two miles thereof. The general land use plan within this area shall be shown on the map, which shall also show the areas of jurisdiction affected and any boundaries between such areas of jurisdiction. If the general land use plan is uniform throughout the area depicted, it may be described in the legend in lieu of an overlay. 3. Where commercially available, a topographic map, 1:250,000 scale, showing any proposed transmission line route of more than 50 miles in length and the adjacent area. For routes of less than 50 miles in length, use a scale of 1:62,500. If application is made for alternative transmission line routes, all routes may be shown on the same map, if practicable, designated by applicant s order of preference. 4. Where commercially available, a topographic map, 1:62,500 scale, of each proposed transmission line route of more than 50 miles in length showing that portion of the route within two miles of any subdivided area. The general land use plan within the area shall be shown on a 1:62,500 map required for Exhibit A-3, and for the map required by this Exhibit A-4, which shall also show the areas of jurisdiction affected and any boundaries between such areas of jurisdiction. If the general land use plan is uniform throughout the area depicted, it may be described in the legend in lieu of on an overlay. INTRODUCTION The existing 1kV transmission line segment and proposed segment relocation is located entirely on privately owned land in unincorporated northeastern Pinal County. Major land uses in the area surrounding the transmission line segment include mining and industrial uses, with primarily residential, commercial, and industrial land uses within the incorporated limits of the Town of Superior. The mining and residential areas are surrounded by Tonto National Forest which is federal land administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. INVENTORY METHODS For the purpose of this analysis, the study area included lands within approximately 1 mile of the existing 1kV transmission line and the proposed segment relocation. Within that study area, URS conducted an inventory of the land jurisdiction, ownership (surface management), and land uses. Surface management, jurisdiction, and land use information were identified through a review of data acquired from the Arizona Land Resource Information System (ALRIS 2007-20); the Pinal County Comprehensive Plan (Pinal County 2009), development services code, and zoning ordinance (Pinal County 2012a, 2012b, 2012c); the Town of Superior zoning map (Town of Superior 2000) and General Plan (2009); the Tonto National Forest Plan (USDA FS 1985); aerial photography; and field reconnaissance. SRP Superior to Silver King A-1 June 2012

INVENTORY RESULTS Jurisdiction and Land Ownership (Surface Management) The study area encompasses the northern boundary of the Town of Superior and a portion of unincorporated Pinal County and includes both federal and privately owned land. The federal land is administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Tonto National Forest, Globe Ranger District. The jurisdiction and land ownership within the study area is shown on Exhibit A-1. Existing Land Use Within the study area, land uses generally follow along the boundary of the incorporated and unincorporated areas. The land within the incorporated limits of the Town of Superior includes industrial and residential properties and uses, consistent with the Town of Superior s zoning for those lands. These lands are along the southern edge of the study area boundary, approximately 0.7 to 1.0 mile from the existing 1kV transmission line. The private land in the unincorporated part of the study area includes primarily mining facilities, roads, utilities, and some undeveloped lands. In proximity to the existing 1kV transmission line, there are limited-access unpaved roads and some previously used mine tailing pond areas associated with past mining operations. South/southeast of the existing 1kV transmission line the private land includes buildings and other structures, material piles, tailings ponds, pits, and reclaimed slopes. Toward the north and northwest of the existing 1kV transmission line, a high-voltage transmission line corridor is present, which includes a 230kV transmission line and 500kV transmission line. The Silver King Mine Road, which is publicly accessible through the area, follows near the ridgeline under the 1kV, 230kV, and 500kV lines. The private property northwest of the 230kV and 500kV transmission lines is relatively undisturbed. Though the private and unincorporated lands are zoned by Pinal County as General Rural for uses such as dwellings, agriculture, and dairy (Pinal County 2012a, 2012c), Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S. 11-812, A2) exempts mining uses from zoning regulations (Pinal County 2012b). The federal land in the unincorporated part of the study area includes National Forest land, with unpaved roads and utilities, though that area remains relatively undisturbed. This National Forest land is part of the extensive 2F Management Area in the Globe Ranger District of the Tonto National Forest, which is managed for a variety of uses particularly water quality maintenance, dispersed recreation, wildlife habitat improvement, and livestock forage production (USDA FS 1985). Facilities include two-track roads, the bladed Forest Road 229 (Silver King Mine Road), and an electrical substation. The existing land use within the study area is shown on Exhibit A-2. Future Land Use In general, future land uses are not expected to differ significantly from existing land uses within the study area. The future land use within the incorporated limits of the Town of Superior is expected to remain similar to existing uses, as most of the land within the incorporated area includes developed uses (industrial and residential). Future use of private land in the unincorporated part of the study area is designated in the Pinal County comprehensive plan as Very Low Density Residential (rural) with Mining/Extraction in the general vicinity of Superior. The Town of Superior General Plan (2009) categorizes this land outside of the Town boundary but within its planning area as Mining, Industrial Park, and Low Density Residential, which is generally consistent with the uses identified by the County (though locations vary slightly). As a result, SRP Superior to Silver King A-2 June 2012

use of the private land in the study area is expected to continue similar to present uses, with the potential for some increased mining uses on the private land, including the addition of rock storage related to mining activities. Future uses of the federal land in the unincorporated part of the study area are not expected to change from existing uses, as no specific changes have been proposed to the management described under existing land uses. However, in this area future land uses are categorized in the Town s General Plan as mainly Park/Open Space, Mining, Industrial Park, and Low and Medium Density Residential. The Town assumes that annexation could expand to the west through land exchanges and disposals by the Forest Service. Should land transfer from federal ownership, future uses would be expected to change. The future land use within the study area is shown on Exhibit A-2 (as existing uses are not expected to change substantially). IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY The potential effects of the proposed relocation of a segment of the Superior to Silver King 1kV transmission line on existing and future land uses were assessed by considering whether the project would substantially alter the type of land use (e.g., residential, industrial) or create restrictions on future land use opportunities. The study area was reviewed for potential impacts on land uses, recognizing that only those land uses within the proposed transmission line corridor would be impacted. IMPACT ASSESSMENT RESULTS The existing land use of the proposed transmission line corridor includes mining with undeveloped areas. The new location proposed for the 1kV transmission line is undeveloped except for the Silver King Mine Road, other unpaved roads, and 230kV and 500kV lines, which the 1kV line would parallel the southernmost edge of the existing transmission line corridor. The nine replacement structures (primarily single-pole structures) would result in a minimal amount of disturbance to the undeveloped area, though they would not adversely affect existing roads or the utility corridor. Given the distance to the nearest developed lands, particularly residential areas that are approximately 0.7 mile away, no impacts on residential uses are anticipated. Future uses of the project area would not be adversely impacted, as the property owner has requested the relocation to accommodate future uses, including storage of rock from mine shaft sinking and underground development activities. As a result, co-locating the 1kV transmission line along the corridor for the 230kV and 500kV transmission lines provides benefits to the property owner for future uses. CONCLUSION By relocating the 1kV line segment adjacent to and parallel to the existing 230kV and 500kV transmission lines, private land under the existing route could be used more efficiently for current and future mining use, and the land used for transmission lines would be consolidated along an existing utility corridor. SRP Superior to Silver King A-3 June 2012

REFERENCES Arizona Land Resource Information System (ALRIS). 2007-20. Pinal County. 2012a. Pinal County Development Services Code. http://www.codepublishing.com/az/ pinalcounty. Accessed on April 30, 2012. Pinal County. 2012b. Zoning Ordinance. http://pinalcountyaz.gov/departments/planningdevelopment/ Documents/PZC007.ORD.FINAL.pdf. Accessed on April 30, 2012. Pinal County. 2012c. GIS Map Viewer. http://gismaps.pinalcountyaz.gov/geocortex/essentials/web/ Viewer.aspx?Site=PinalCounty#. Accessed on April 30, 2012. Pinal County. 2009 (updated 2011). We Create Our Future: Pinal County Comprehensive Plan. Florence, Arizona. Town of Superior. 2009. Town of Superior General Plan Update, adopted December 18, 2003, amended February 19, 2009. Superior, Arizona. Town of Superior. 2000. Official Zoning Map of the Town of Superior. http://superiorarizona.com/images/zoning map-800.jpg. Accessed on March 30, 2012. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Forest Service (FS). 1985 (amended 2006). Tonto National Forest Plan. Phoenix, Arizona. SRP Superior to Silver King A-4 June 2012

R12E R13E Exhibit A-1 18 16 14 17 13 SILVER KING 16 Surface Management and Jurisdiction Superior to Silver King 1kV Line Segment Relocation Project 22 21 23 24 19 20 Legend 21 22 Proposed 1kV Relocation Study Area Existing 1kV Transmission Line T1S Existing 230kV Transmission Line 27 28 Existing 500kV Transmission Line 26 Proposed 1kV Segment Relocation 25 30 29 27 Existing Substation 28 Surface Management U.S. Forest Service Private Land Jurisdiction Town of Superior 33 35 36 33 31 34 34 General Features 32 SUPERIOR U.S. Highway State Route 05 02 03 01 04 06 Local Road Flagstaff 04 0517 Project Location in Pinal County Phoenix Township and Range Boundary Section Boundary 8 T2S Tucson 08 09 08 11 12 19 09 07 Source: Transmission Facilities and Boundaries: SRP 2012 Base Map: ADOT 2009, ALRIS 2007-20 Topo: Superior and Picketpost Mountain USGS 7.5-minute Quadrangles P:\ENVPLANNING\SRP\23446218_SRP 1kV line\gis\mxds\cec\surfacemanagement.mxd (BLC 4/23/2012) 0 0.5 Miles 1:62,500 1

Exhibit A-2 SILVER KING Existing and Planned Land Use Superior to Silver King 1kV Line Segment Relocation Project Legend Proposed 1kV Relocation Study Area Existing 1kV Transmission Line Existing 230kV Transmission Line Existing 500kV Transmission Line Existing Substation Jurisdiction Town of Superior Existing and Planned Land Use Residential Industrial Undeveloped and Mining (Rural) Multiple Use (U.S. Forest Service) General Features SUPERIOR Flagstaff U.S. Highway State Route 17 Phoenix Project Location in Pinal County Local Road 8 Tucson 19 0 Source: Land Use: URS 2012 Transmission Facilities and Boundaries: SRP 2012 Base Map: ADOT 2009, ALRIS 2007-20 Topo: Superior and Picketpost Mountain USGS 7.5-minute Quadrangles P:\ENVPLANNING\SRP\23446218_SRP 1kV line\gis\mxds\cec\existing_planned_landuse.mxd (BLC 5/11/2012) 0.5 Miles 1:62,500 1