U.S.UCAN and its role in Wisconsin

Similar documents
Program Model: Muskingum University offers a unique graduate program integra6ng BUSINESS and TECHNOLOGY to develop the 21 st century professional.

Fixed Scope Offering (FSO) for Oracle SRM

Introducing the Oxford AHSN. Professor Gary Ford, CBE Chief Execu?ve Officer Consultant Physician

Data Governance Framework: Bank of Canada

Na#onal Cybersecurity Network. Advancing Innova,ve Workforce Solu,ons for America s High- Skilled, High- Demand Jobs December 2, 2014

CSER & emerge Consor.a EHR Working Group Collabora.on on Display and Storage of Gene.c Informa.on in Electronic Health Records

What does it mean to be a leader in healthcare?

The Shi'ing Role of School Psychologists within a Mul7-7ered System of Support Framework. FASP Annual Conference October 29, 2015

Protec'ng Informa'on Assets - Week 8 - Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Planning. MIS 5206 Protec/ng Informa/on Assets Greg Senko

Legacy Archiving How many lights do you leave on? September 14 th, 2015

MAXIMIZING THE SUCCESS OF YOUR E-PROCUREMENT TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT. How to Drive Adop.on, Efficiency, and ROI for the Long Term

Best Practices from BTOP & Key Implications for Bidding & Sustainability New NY Broadband Program: Bidders/Stakeholders Forum

Soody Tronson Managing Founder Operational Experience Matters

Broadband Project Frequently Asked Questions

NSF/Intel Partnership on Cyber- Physical Systems Security and Privacy (CPS- Security)

Mission. To provide higher technological educa5on with quality, preparing. competent professionals, with sound founda5ons in science, technology

Public Hearing for Consolida4ng the Small Schools Model for Improved Quality and Efficiency South Atlanta Educa4onal Complex

ECEC Europe s Cloud Future. Chambre du Commerce September. October. 14. Mai 2013, Konzerthaus. 1st 2014

Case Study. The SACM Journey at the Ontario Government

CONTENTS. Introduc on 2. Undergraduate Program 4. BSC in Informa on Systems 4. Graduate Program 7. MSC in Informa on Science 7

Strategy for Universal Access to Health and Universal Health Coverage

Range of Organiza7onal Approaches

ENCOURAGE posi.ve peer influences within the school and community through violence preven.on efforts

Connec(ng to the NC Educa(on Cloud

addition to upgrading connectivity between the PoPs to 100Gbps, GPN is pursuing additional collocation space in Kansas City and is in the pilot stage

The Power of Positive Voices

Governance as Leadership: Reframing the Work of Nonprofit Boards

AGENDA Morning Session

Financial Opera,ons Track: ROI vs. ROCE (Return on Customer Experience) Speaker: Robert Lane, Strategic Sourcing Manager, Premier Health Partners

Distance.fsu.edu. Dr. Susann Rudasill, Director Office of Distance Learning

Vision of Interoperability Jamie Ferguson, Stan Huff, Cris Ross

Capitalize on your carbon management solu4on investment

Challenges of PM in Albania and a New. Professional Perspec8ve. Prepared by: Dritan Mezini, MBA, MPM B.S. CS

2012 UC CUCSA Staff Engagement Survey Recommenda9on Report Summary Career Development. January 13, 2014

Health Information Technology. Consultant Directory. Compiled by Colorado Medical Society/Component Societies

Qubera Solu+ons Access Governance a next genera0on approach to Iden0ty Management

Business Analysis Center of Excellence The Cornerstone of Business Transformation

Exchange of experience from a SuccessFactors LMS Implementa9on

Information and Communications Technology Supply Chain Risk Management (ICT SCRM) AND NIST Cybersecurity Framework

Update on the Financial Condi0on of Hofstra University March, 2013

Founda'onal IT Governance A Founda'onal Framework for Governing Enterprise IT Adapted from the ISACA COBIT 5 Framework

Investor Presenta,on Third Quarter ServiceNow All Rights Reserved 1

Migrating to Hosted Telephony. Your ultimate guide to migrating from on premise to hosted telephony.

Transcription:

U.S.UCAN and its role in Wisconsin Mark Johnson Interim Execu=ve Director, U.S. UCAN May 8, 2012 1 6/6/12, 2011 U.S. UCAN

February 2009: An inflec=on point From BroadbandUSA.gov: The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act appropriated $7.2 billion for the Department of Agriculture's Rural U=li=es Service (RUS) and the Department of Commerce's Na=onal Telecommunica=ons Informa=on Administra=on (NTIA) to expand broadband access and adop=on in communi=es across the U.S., which will increase jobs, spur investments in technology and infrastructure, and provide long- term economic benefits. 2 6/6/12, 2011 U.S. UCAN

July 2009: NTIA Broadband Technologies Opportunity Program (BTOP) Round 1 NOFA: Sec=on 6001 of the Recovery Act establishes a na=onal broadband service development and expansion program to promote five core purposes: a. To provide access to broadband service to consumers residing in unserved areas of the country; b. To provide improved access to broadband service to consumers residing in underserved areas of the country; c. To provide broadband access, educa2on, awareness, training, equipment, and support to community anchor ins2tu2ons (e.g., schools, libraries, medical facili2es), or organiza2ons and agencies serving vulnerable popula2ons (e.g., low- income, unemployed, aged), or job- crea2ng strategic facili2es located in state- or federally designated economic development areas; d. To improve access to, and use of, broadband service by public safety agencies; and e. To s=mulate the demand for broadband, economic growth, and job crea=on.15 NOFA: Notice of Funds Availability i.e. Federal announcement of the grant program 3 6/6/12, 2011 U.S. UCAN

December 2009: First BTOP winners announced January 15 2010: BTOP Round 2 NOFA released due March 15 March 2010: Na=onal Broadband Plan released 4 6/6/12, 2011 U.S. UCAN

Na=onal Broadband Plan: Unified Community Anchor Network (PP 154-55, 194) In the past, the connec3vity needs of research ins3tu3ons have been met by non- profit research and educa0on (R&E) networks such as Internet2 and Na3onal LambdaRail. R&E networks played a central role in the development and growth of the Internet itself through ARPANET and later NSFNET. Today, similar R&E networks provide high- speed (10 Mbps- 1 Gbps) connec3vity to 66,000 community anchor ins3tu3ons. But more can be done it is es3mated that only one- third of anchor ins3tu3ons have access to an R&E network today. This model should be expanded to other community ins0tu0ons. 5 6/6/12, 2011 U.S. UCAN

Na=onal Broadband Plan: Unified Community Anchor Network (PP 154-55, 194) One approach to ensure connec3vity for facili3es that serve public purposes is to give a non- profit ins0tu0on the mission and capability to focus on serving the broadband needs of public ins0tu0ons, including health clinics, community colleges, schools, community centers, libraries, museums, and other public access points. 6 6/6/12, 2011 U.S. UCAN

Na=onal Broadband Plan: Unified Community Anchor Network (PP 154-55, 194) Recommenda=on 8.22: The federal government and state governments should develop an ins2tu2onal framework that will help America s anchor ins2tu2ons obtain broadband connec2vity, training, applica2ons and services. 7 6/6/12, 2009 Internet2

BTOP Round 2 NOFA: CCI priority criteria: deploy Middle Mile broadband infrastructure with a commitment to offer new or substan2ally upgraded service to community anchor ins2tu2ons. incorporate a public- private partnership serve community colleges serve public safety 8 6/6/12, 2011 U.S. UCAN

The Research & Educa=on Network Model Advanced networks tailored to specific needs of users High capacity, uncongested, transparent, leading edge network technologies (IPv6, mul=cast) advanced applica=ons ready Priced to encourage, not discourage, new use, new applica=ons, growth Networks owned, controlled, directed by their users Operated with full community transparency Three =ers: na=onal, regional/state, local Non- profit, public purpose Facilita=ng an ac2ve community of users as important as the network itself self help, virtual help desk, experiments, collabora=on, problem solving, training, etc. A people network that makes the technical network useful 9 6/6/12, 2011 U.S. UCAN

U.S.UCAN Proposal: na3onal infrastructure project to 3e together all anchor networks funded by BTOP. This proposal expands the model used today. this project glues the winning BTOP projects together as a whole. Simply put, this project does not compete with other BTOP projects; it completes them. 10 6/6/12, 2011 U.S. UCAN

BTOP Free Like a Puppy BTOP is a capital program. There is no money for operations! Applicants had to show a plan for financial sustainability over 8 years. 11 6/6/12, 2011 U.S. UCAN

Goals of the U.S. UCAN Project: Leverage the Internet2 Network and the Research & Educa=on Networking Model to support all 200,000 community anchor ins=tu=ons in the U.S. Enable - for the anchor community - what the Internet2 organiza=on has provided for higher educa=on Eliminate the network as a barrier to success for CAIs Integrate new CAIs into the R&E community Develop func=oning communi=es of users: convening authority, working groups, standards, problem solving, sharing best prac=ces and technical know how, virtual help desk, training, R&D, policy advocacy, etc. U.S. UCAN development efforts to coincide with network build comple=on (approx. 18-24 months) Posi=oned as a project of the University Corpora=on of Advanced Internet Development Contribu=ng staffing & resources in collabora=on with growing numbers of partners 12 6/6/12, 2011 U.S. UCAN

Planned 100G Internet2 Network in support of U.S. UCAN 13 6/6/12, 2011 Internet2

Infrastructure Goals Provide a leading genera=on na=onal scale infrastructure to support community anchor ins=tu=on applica=ons Fundamentally linked to (and dependent on) similar efforts at the regional, state and local level Enable new applica=ons to have flawless performance at scale Support complete opera=onal transparency including network opera=ons, finances and network performance Community owned infrastructure with community driven priori=es Engineered to meet CAI expecta=ons and requirements 14 6/6/12, 2011 U.S. UCAN

U.S.UCAN.org Enable for the anchor community what the Internet2 organiza=on has provided for higher educa=on Integrate new CAIs into the R&E community Func=oning community of users: convening authority, working groups, standards, problem solving, sharing best prac=ces and technical know how, virtual help desk, training, R&D, policy advocacy, etc. Goal to have something up and running by the =me the network builds are completed (approx. 18-24 months) Start as a project within Internet2 Modest, but growing, staffing requirement resources?

Task Force on CAI Economic Models Develop an economic model(s) that will assist regional and na3onal R&E networks and Community Anchor (CAI) partners in addressing programma3c, opera3onal and financial challenges contained within the federal Broadband Technology Opportunity Program (BTOP). The work of the Task Force will include: Iden=fy the costs associated with establishing the U.S. UCAN program, including connec=vity of CAI s to regional and na=onal BTOP networks Propose cost recovery models that meet the goals of the BTOP program while also maintaining financial viability of na=onal and regional R&E networks Assure cost recovery models support the long- term programma=c and financial interests of the CAI s Not constrain the development of applica=ons and services for CAI s Adapt to significant changes in demand, i.e., are easily scalable Sensi=ve to diversity among the regional R&E networks (e.g., size, geography, funding sources, organiza=onal rela=onships) Not assume complex new business requirements for CAI s and their network partners Include the capability to engage and support BTOP funded projects where R&E network involvement currently does not exist 16 6/6/12, 2011 U.S. UCAN

Task Force Members Task Force Chair Mike Roberts Robert (Bob) Bocher represen3ng the American Library Associa3on Office for Informa3on Technology Policy (ALA/OITP) John Branson Director of Educa3onal Research Development and Technology Services, Chester County, Pennsylvania Intermediate Unit, Chester County, Pennsylvania Marianne Chitwood Senior Manager I- light Indiana Tom Rolfes Educa3on Informa3on Technology Manager, Nebraska Informa3on Technology Commission/Network Nebraska William (Bill) Clebsch Associate Vice President for IT Services, Stanford University Joanne Hovis President, Columbia Telecommunica3ons Corp. (CTC) Denise Atkinson- Shorey Chief Informa3on Officer, Eagle- Net (Colorado) Dave Kirby Health Care Informa3cs Consultant George Laskaris Chief Execu3ve Officer, NJEDge Ray Ford Chief Informa3on Officer, University of Montana 17 6/6/12, 2011 U.S. UCAN

Task Force Recommenda2ons Founda2on elements Transi2on beginning in 2012 Create a U.S.UCAN Council to advise all elements of the overall U.S.UCAN program Internet2 should create and host a U.S.UCAN Na=onal Program Office with an es=mated budget of $1.9M using a viable cost recovery model [to be phased in over mul3ple years] The Primary mission of U.S.UCAN should be to assist CAIs in connec=ng to broadband ARN networks. [by collabora3ng with ARNs and CAIs to drive advanced applica3ons, develop best prac3ces, iden3fy emerging trends and engage cons3tuents] Create U.S.UCAN Council Hire a permanent Execu=ve Director Migrate SEGP program to U.S.UCAN Migrate rural health program to U.S.UCAN Develop U.S. UCAN affiliate program to support CAIs in each affiliated state Create logical segrega=on of R&E network from US- UCAN (SEGP) network. Bootstrap the U.S.UCAN Council and use council to help with E.D. search Reopen search for ED; Hire in early 2012 Prepare budget covering transi=onal period; Begin transi=on of SEGP revenue to cover NPO costs and allow for replacement of network revenue; Con=nue to approach Gates Founda=on to assist in transi=onal funding Pilot affiliate model with a small number of full service regionals and a non- R&E BTOP winner Build dis=nct cost basis for US- UCAN network on new network founda=on.

U.S. UCAN Affiliate program Organiza=ons were invited to submit proposals to par=cipate 14 affiliate organiza=ons organized into 5 groups Wiscnet, Indiana Gigapop, Morenet CENIC, PNWGP MAGPI, OARnet, NYSERnet MCNC, FLR, MDren UEN, IRON, Montana Affiliates iden=fying common issues, opportuni=es, challenges Workshop held April26 19 6/6/12

US UCAN Workshop Mark Johnson 4.26.12 20 6/6/12, 2011 U.S. UCAN

Format / agenda 5 speakers covering public safety, public media, healthcare, libraries, K12 educa=on Short presenta=ons followed by extended Q&A / discussion Working lunch to iden=fy key opportuni=es Breakout sessions roughly organized around geographic regions focused on taking advantage of the opportuni=es Report out from breakouts Full group discussion of reports Wrap up

General impressions Lots of energy Very posi=ve Very liule skep=cism or nega=vity Very broad and diverse auendance All affiliates except Montana present MERIT sent 3! AARnet, REDclara, CERnet Several speakers stayed for the en=re event Anxious to do it again selected the moderator for the next workshop

Key findings Step 1 for CAIs is solid, high performance connec=vity Need Net+ like services specifically packaged for CAIs US UCAN needs dedicated communica=ons support Affiliates want to co- brand services with US UCAN We should use this opportunity to enlist public media s ability as story tellers US UCAN and affiliates need to go where the money is e.g. health care Grouping of Affiliates is successful and important Lots of opportuni=es for synergy across sectors once the connec=vity hurdle is cleared

Next Steps Immediate Develop an ac=on plan for each Affiliate Group Develop a porxolio of successful CAI stories Develop a communica=on plan for stories and branding Iden=fy bandwidth guidelines by sector Focus on required applica=ons Iden=fy champions for Health, Public Media and Public Safety Push forward with speed test project Longer Term Repository of CAI success stories, best prac=ces and contacts Rela=onship with Public Media and successful crea=on of programming Significant US UCAN presence at Internet2 FMM US UCAN presenta=on by CAIs and affiliate at professional mee=ngs such as HIMSS 24 6/6/12

U.S.UCAN Questions? Mark Johnson - mj@usucan.org 6/6/12