HIGHLY ENRICHED URANIUM INVENTORY



Similar documents
knowledgeable. responsive.

GAO DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

March 21, Environmental Management Program Strategies: A National Responsibility

United States Department of Energy. Excess Uranium Inventory Management Plan

DOE Environmental Management Upcoming Contract Opportunities

Audit Report. The National Nuclear Security Administration's Weapons Dismantlement and Disposition Program

NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

Pantex prehistory archeological site 7,100 acres survey for archeological sites 69 archeological sites recorded 12 Pre-World War II 57 prehistoric

NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

Final Plan for the Conversion of Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride

UNIDIR RESOURCES IDEAS FOR PEACE AND SECURITY. Disposition of Excess Military Nuclear Material February Overview. Pavel Podvig UNIDIR

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. 25 th Annual Report to Congress March 2015

March 31, The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) is pleased to submit its Annual Program Performance Report for Fiscal Year 1999.

Lung Cancer and Exposure to Ionizing Radiation

NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. Actions Needed to Clarify Use of Contractor Assurance Systems for Oversight and Performance Evaluation

GAO. Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives

NUCLEAR FORENSICS UNDERGRADUATE SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM

A National Tracking Center for Monitoring Shipments of HEU, MOX, and Spent Nuclear Fuel: How Do We Implement?

1 st QUARTER TRANSPORTATION REPORT FY 2014

Environmental Cleanup Update Briefing on the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Joel Bradburne DOE Site Lead Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office

CRS Report for Congress

Available electronically at

UNIDIR RESOURCES IDEAS FOR PEACE AND SECURITY. Treatment of Pre-existing Fissile Material Stocks in an FM(C) T January 2010 Harold A.

Savannah River Site SAVANNAH RIVER SITE

TOOLS FOR CLOSURE PROJECT AND CONTRACT MANAGEMENT: DEVELOPMENT OF THE ROCKY FLATS INTEGRATED CLOSURE PROJECT BASELINE

Significant incidents in nuclear fuel cycle

Salary Information for Health Physicists and Nuclear Engineers, June 2001

AUDIT REPORT. The Department of Energy's Management of Spare Parts at Selected Sites

Development of A Risk Informed Approach to D&D Priority Setting Forensic Evaluation of D&D at Oak Ridge with a Focus on K 25 and K 27

April 30, 2013 E M. Environmental Management. safety performance cleanup closure

AUDIT REPORT. Follow-up on the Department of Energy's Acquisition and Maintenance of Software Licenses

NNSA s Risk-Based Nuclear Security Enterprise-wide Facility Disposition Program 14108

High Bridge Associates, Inc.

DRAFT Milestones and Recommendations: Fuel Cycle OECD/IEA 2010

U.S. Commercial Power and Fuel Supply Outlook

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audit Services

INSPECTION REPORT. Alleged Nuclear Material Control and Accountability Weaknesses at the Department of Energy's Portsmouth Project

U.S. Policy Objectives for HEU Minimization

Nuclear Emissions and the Blue Ribbon Commission

Hazard Classification of the Remote Handled Low Level Waste Disposal Facility

BAR-CODE BASED WEIGHT MEASUREMENT STATION FOR PHYSICAL INVENTORY TAKING OF PLUTONIUM OXIDE CONTAINERS

International collaboration helps keep nuclear materials out of the hands of terrorists.

Material Control and Accounting

Report of the Plutonium Disposition Working Group: Analysis of Surplus Weapon Grade Plutonium Disposition Options

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

Mixed-Oxide Fuel Fabrication Plant and Plutonium Disposition: Management and Policy Issues

Nuclear Energy University Programs (NEUP) Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 Annual Planning Webinar Mission Suppor+ng: Fuel Cycle Technologies (MS- FC- 1)

Department of Energy

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS ACROSS THE DOE COMPLEX

ADMINISTATIVE / WASTE / REMEDIATION SBOT. 17-May-11. CALIFORNIA LAWRENCE BERKELEY LAB POC David Chen Telephone (510) dtchen@lbl.

Improving Project Management. Report of the Contract and Project Management Working Group

APPENDIX CC NUCLEAR WASTE STORAGE

Plutonium Watch. Tracking Plutonium Inventories by David Albright and Kimberly Kramer. July 2005, Revised August 2005

D&D of the French High Enrichment Gaseous Diffusion Plant

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. request includes funding for a standardized corporate project management enterprise.

Progress towards complimentary cooperative monitoring facilities at the <% Savannah River Site, USA and VNIIEF, RF Q ^ x>^ to *' «->

How To Plan A Nuclear Power Plant

POLICY ISSUE NOTATION VOTE

LLNS PRESIDENT GEORGE MILLER NAMES KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

GAO. NUCLEAR SCIENCE Accelerator Technology for Tritium Production Needs Further Study

Used Nuclear Fuel Receipt, Shipping and Disposition at Savannah River Site (SRS)

AUDIT REPORT FACILITIES INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DOE/IG-0468 APRIL 2000

SPECIAL REPORT. Incurred Cost Audit Coverage of Non- Management and Operating Contractors

Audit Report. Implementation of the Recovery Act at the Savannah River Site

SPECIAL ITEM NO Integrated Consulting Services SPECIAL ITEM NO RC Integrated Consulting Services, Recovery Purchase

WM'99 CONFERENCE, FEBRUARY 28 - MARCH 4, 1999

Project Dashboard - February 2013

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections. Inspection Report

Nuclear Forensics Undergraduate Scholarship Program

Thorium for Use in Plutonium Disposition, Proliferation-Resistant Fuels for Developing Countries, and Future Reactor Designs

October 20, 2004 LOUISIANA ENERGY SERVICES - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON DECOMMISSIONING FUNDING PLAN

SPECIAL REPORT. Management Challenges at the Department of Energy Fiscal Year 2015

Part 1 General and Administrative Information. Part 3 Applicant s Environmental Report Combined License Stage

REAL PROPERTY ASSET MANAGEMENT (DOE O 430.1B) REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST

GAO. ENERGY EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION Case-Processing Bottlenecks Delay Payment of Claims

U.S. Department of Energy ORDER

ASTM C26 LONG RANGE PLAN Committee on the Nuclear Fuel Cycle

WASTE MANAGEMENT 2012 Opportunities for Small Businesses. Bill Shingler Vice President, Operations Environmental & Nuclear Fluor Government Group

Safeguarding Nuclear Weapon-Usable Materials in Russia

OFFICE OF ASSISTANT MANAGER FOR SAFEGUARDS, SECURITY, AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT OAK RIDGE OFFICE OFFICE OF SCIENCE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Exhibit 1 List of Major Information Systems

International transfers of nuclear material

Plutonium vs. Uranium: The Road Less Traveled. In a world where nuclear proliferation may no longer be held back by the guise of antiproliferation

Nuclear Material Accounting Handbook. Vienna, May Services Series 15

April 24, 2013 INTRODUCTION

The National Intelligence Estimative Product

Department of Energy FY 2017 Congressional Budget Request

Safeguards and Security

CONSENT BASED SITING PUBLIC MEETING

NRC s Program for Remediating Polluted Sites J.T. Greeves, D.A. Orlando, J.T. Buckley, G.N. Gnugnoli, R.L. Johnson US Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The Parties agree as follows: ARTICLE I. For the purposes of this Agreement:

WASTE MANAGEMENT 2013 Opportunities for Small Businesses BILL SHINGLER VICE PRESIDENT, OPERATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL & NUCLEAR FLUOR GOVERNMENT GROUP

Applying Digital Library Technologies to Nuclear Forensics

Project Dashboard - November 2015 Post CD-2 Active Projects

Department of Energy

NATIONAL ACADEMY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

How To Clean Up A Uranium Enrichment Plant

Department of Oil and Gas Asset Management

Workshop on U.S. Nuclear Weapons Safety and Security

U.S. Department of Energy Volume 2, Issue No. 11 June 10, 2010

Transcription:

U NITE D DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY STATES OF A M ERICA HIGHLY ENRICHED URANIUM INVENTORY AMOUNTS OF HIGHLY ENRICHED URANIUM IN THE UNITED STATES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF SECURITY AND SAFETY PERFORMANCE ASSURANCE JANUARY 2006

Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 PURPOSE... 1 BACKGROUND... 1 METHODOLOGY... 2 ORGANIZATION OF THIS REPORT... 2 SECTION 2 U.S. HEU INVENTORY... 3 Y-12, PANTEX, AND DEFENSE DEPARTMENT... 4 IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY... 4 SAVANNAH RIVER SITE... 4 PORTSMOUTH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT... 5 ROCKY FLATS ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY SITE... 5 LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY... 5 OTHER SITES WITH SMALL HEU HOLDINGS... 5 SECTION 3 MATERIAL BALANCE... 7 ACQUISITIONS... 8 REMOVALS... 8 CLASSIFIED TRANSACTIONS... 9 CALCULATED INVENTORY... 9 LIST OF T ABLES TABLE 1 U.S. HEU INVENTORY AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2004... 3 TABLE 2 MATERIAL BALANCE FOR URANIUM-235 IN HEU... 7 TABLE 3 HEU DISPOSITION ACTIVITIES... 9 i

HIGHLY ENRICHED URANIUM This page intentionally blank. ii

INTRODUCTION SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE The Department of Energy (DOE) prepared this report, Highly Enriched Uranium Inventory, to serve as the authoritative source of information regarding the current amounts of highly enriched uranium (HEU) in the United States. It updates information previously developed in the mid- 1990s, and analyzes the major changes in HEU 1 inventories since 1996 in terms of Government and commercial activities that affect HEU inventories. The information in this report should provide the public with relevant information to understand the current status of HEU inventories in the U.S. without threatening national security or undermining our nation s nuclear deterrence activities. It should also aid DOE in discussions with stakeholders related to uranium storage, safety, and security and assist those with responsibility for formulating policies with respect to identification and disposition of excess nuclear materials. In addition, the publication of this data should encourage other nations to declassify and release similar data. BACKGROUND As part of an openness initiative announced in 1993, the United States began a process of declassifying and releasing certain information about nuclear material inventories and identifying excess nuclear materials for disposition. During a June 1994 press conference, the U.S. released information about HEU production and inventories. At a February 1996 press conference, the U.S. provided information about quantities of HEU that had been declared surplus to the nation s needs. During the mid-1990s, DOE undertook an extensive effort to develop a more accurate history of the production and inventory of HEU from 1945 through 1996. A DOE team examined facility production records, material control and accountability (MC&A) records, historical MC&A summary reports, individual site inventory and transaction data, and historical reports and memoranda. There are typically hundreds of thousands of transactions per year (such as movement of material, enrichment changes, or a process, such as dissolution, that alters material form). In some cases, records of these transactions were maintained in summary form, particularly for the period prior to 1969 when the U.S. first implemented an automated nuclear material accounting system to track the numerous HEU transactions. Although there were some limitations (e.g., some site reports did not distinguish between low enriched uranium and HEU), the effort in the mid-1990s resulted in a more accurate and definitive source of information 1 HEU is uranium that has been enriched in the uranium-235 isotope and contains 20 percent or more uranium-235. Natural uranium contains 0.711 percent uranium-235. 1

HIGHLY ENRICHED URANIUM about the history of HEU production and inventories than had previously been available. The effort culminated in a draft 1996 DOE report that covered the time period from 1945 to the end of Government fiscal year 1996. In addition to providing the HEU inventory information for that time period, the 1996 draft report discussed the history of the U.S. government organizations that controlled HEU usage, the safeguards mechanisms in place at various times, and various aspects of HEU production and usage. METHODOLOGY Using the 1996 draft report as a baseline, this 2006 report updates information from the 1996 document and presents the material balance for HEU for the period October 1, 1996, through September 30, 2004. This report was prepared from data contained in facility MC&A records and individual site inventory and transaction data as reported to the Nuclear Materials Management and Safeguards System (NMMSS). The analysis of the current inventory began with confirmation of the total HEU inventory as of September 30, 1996, that was given in the 1996 document. The previously-reported inventory figures were confirmed using data provided to the NMMSS by facility operators. The total inventory of HEU for September 30, 2004, was then obtained in the same manner. The distribution of the final inventory by location was determined by means of the reporting identification symbols that uniquely identify facilities in the NMMSS, using the same reporting identification symbol groupings that were used in the 1996 document. The analysis of the current material balance was based on the total September 30, 1996, inventory and transaction records from the NMMSS. All transaction records for the eight-year period of October 1, 1996, through September 30, 2004, were obtained and grouped according to the use code 2 designation. The transaction amounts were then summed to determine the net change in inventory by use code, utilizing the same use code groupings as in the earlier status report. These net changes were applied to the September 30, 1996, inventory to arrive at the calculated September 30, 2004, inventory. ORGANIZATION OF THIS REPORT Section 2 of this report states the U.S. HEU inventory as of September 30, 1996, which was confirmed from records as part of the current effort, and updates those values to September 30, 2004. It also briefly discusses some of the sites with the largest HEU inventories. Section 3 reports the material balance for the confirmed inventory as of September 30, 1996, and updates those values to September 30, 2004. 2 Use codes identify the type of inventory change that a transaction affects. 2

U.S. Highly-Enriched Uranium Inventory SECTION 2 U.S. HEU INVENTORY As of September 30, 2004, the total U.S. HEU inventory was 686.6 metric tons of uranium (MTU) containing 590.5 metric tons of uranium-235 (MTU-235). Uranium-235 is the only naturally occurring fissile isotope of uranium; it makes up only about 0.7 percent by weight of all uranium found in nature. HEU is uranium that has been enriched to a concentration of 20 or more percent uranium-235, and is considered weapons-usable. Table 1 presents the information on the total quantity and location of HEU in the U.S. inventory as of September 30, 2004. (The site names used in the table are those that are current as of December 2005.) For comparison, the 1996 HEU inventory values, with locations identified by their present names, are also included in Table 1. Table 1 U.S. HEU Inventory as of September 30, 1996 and September 30, 2004 Location 9-30-96 MTU 9-30-96 MTU-235 9-30-04 MTU 9-30-04 MTU-235 Y-12 Plant, Pantex Plant, and Defense Department 651.6 557.4 621.2 546.6 Idaho National Laboratory 27.4 19.3 26.8 18.6 Savannah River Site 22.2 14.6 18.7 12.8 Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant 21.7 14.1 0.9 0.5 Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site 6.0 5.6 0.1 0.1 Los Alamos National Laboratory 3.5 3.2 2.4 2.2 Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1.6 1.3 1.6 1.3 K-25 Site 1.5 0.8 1.5 0.8 Sandia National Laboratories 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.5 Hanford Site 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.2 Brookhaven National Laboratory 0.3 0.2 Miscellaneous 3.7 3.0 12.2 6.9 Total 740.6 620.3 686.6 590.5 On November 7, 2005, Secretary of Energy Samuel W. Bodman announced that in the coming decades, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) will remove up to 200 metric tons of HEU from further use as fissile material in U.S. nuclear weapons and prepare this material for other uses. DOE will dispose of the additional HEU the following ways: About 160 metric tons will be provided for use in naval ship power propulsion, postponing the need for construction of a new uranium high-enrichment facility for at least 50 years. About 20 metric tons will be down-blended to low enriched uranium for eventual use in civilian nuclear power reactors, research reactors or related research. Down-blending this material will eliminate its potential usefulness to terrorists. 3

HIGHLY ENRICHED URANIUM Approximately 20 metric tons will be reserved for space and research reactors that currently use HEU, pending development of fuels that would enable the conversion to low enriched uranium fuel cores. The following sections provide additional information on the current locations of the U.S. HEU inventory reported in Table 1. Y-12, PANTEX, AND DEFENSE DEPARTMENT More than 90 percent of the U.S. HEU inventory is located at the Y-12 Plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee; at the Pantex Plant near Amarillo, Texas; and in the custody of the Department of Defense (DoD). These facilities have 621.2 MTU as HEU. For purposes of national security, the HEU inventory for the Y-12 Plant, the Pantex Plant, and DoD is reported as a total quantity rather than separate amounts. The Y-12 National Security Complex was constructed as part of the World War II Manhattan Project. Its first mission was to separate uranium-235 from natural uranium using the electromagnetic separation process. Today, it processes HEU for use in weapon activities and the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program. Y-12 is the repository of U.S. weapons-grade materials, and it has been the destination of fissile materials removed from foreign nuclear facilities. Pantex is a nuclear weapons assembly and disassembly facility that was originally constructed as a conventional bomb plant for the U.S. Army during World War II. Since deactivation of the Rocky Flats Plant, the Pantex Plant has also been used for the interim storage of plutonium. IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY Recently renamed from the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL), the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is located near Idaho Falls, Idaho. Its missions include interim storage of HEU, facility decontamination and decommissioning, and environmental restoration. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 authorized INL to explore the production of hydrogen fuel using nuclear power. INL had 26.8 MTU as HEU as of September 30, 2004. SAVANNAH RIVER SITE The Savannah River Site (SRS), located near Aiken, South Carolina, has been one of the primary producers and processors of nuclear materials in the United States. The site is mainly engaged in cleanup activities related to past work on nuclear weapons. As of September 30, 2004, it had 18.7 MTU as HEU. 4

U.S. Highly-Enriched Uranium Inventory PORTSMOUTH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT The Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant, located at Piketon, Ohio, was originally used for the production of HEU for nuclear weapons. Later, it was used for the production of HEU for military reactors and in the production of low enriched uranium for commercial reactors along with its sister plant in Paducah, Kentucky. Owned by the DOE and leased by the United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC), the Portsmouth plant was shut down in May 2001 when USEC consolidated its uranium enrichment operations in Paducah. The Portsmouth plant had 0.9 MTU as HEU as of September 30, 2004. ROCKY FLATS ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY SITE The Rocky Flats Plant, located near Denver, Colorado, was a nuclear weapons production facility that started operation in 1952. It produced weapon components, including plutonium triggers, which were used at the Pantex Plant to assemble nuclear weapons. In 1994, it was renamed the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, reflecting its earlier mission change from weapon production to environmental cleanup and restoration. As of September 30, 2004, the site had 0.1 MTU as HEU. Cleanup was declared complete in October 2005, and all remaining HEU had been transferred to other sites. LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY Los Alamos National Laboratory is one of two laboratories in the United States where classified work on the design of nuclear weapons is undertaken. (The other is Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory). Managed by the University of California and located at Los Alamos, New Mexico, the laboratory is one of the largest multidisciplinary institutions in the world. It had 2.4 MTU as HEU as of September 30, 2004. OTHER SITES WITH SMALL HEU HOLDINGS Several other sites had small holdings totaling 16.5 MTU as HEU. These include Oak Ridge National Laboratory, K-25 Site, Sandia National Laboratories, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Hanford Site, Brookhaven National Laboratory, and various miscellaneous sites. 5

HIGHLY ENRICHED URANIUM This page intentionally blank. 6

Material Balance SECTION 3 MATERIAL BALANCE The material balance for uranium-235, the fissile isotope of uranium used in nuclear weapons, began with the previously-determined values for the period 1945 through September 30, 1996, and was then modified based on values for the period October 1, 1996, through September 30, 2004. The previous and current material balances are presented in Table 2. Table 2 Material Balance for Uranium-235 in HEU Material Balance Element Material Balance Category MTU-235 for the period of 1945-9/30/1996 MTU-235 for the period of 10/1/1996-9/30/2004 Acquisitions Production from Uranium Enrichment Processes 859.2 Production from Blending 0.3 Miscellaneous Receipts 0.8 Receipts from Foreign Countries 4.9 0.4 Total Acquisitions 864.4 1.2 Removals Refeed at Enrichment Plants 114.2 Nuclear Tests, Wartime Detonations and Naval Reactor Use 31.9 Fission and Transmutation 56.2 0.6 Normal Operating Losses 4.9 0.5 Transfers to Foreign Countries 34.6 0.3 Down Blending 1.5 29.8 Inventory Differences 3.2 Total Removals 246.5 31.2 Totals Beginning Inventory 620.3 Total Acquisitions (+) 864.4 1.2 Uranium Enrichment Process Holdup (+) 1.7 Classified Transactions (+) 0.3 0.2 Total Removals (-) 246.5 31.2 Equals Calculated U.S. Inventory 1 619.9 590.5 Actual U.S. Inventory 620.3 590.5 1 The difference between the September 30, 1996 calculated inventory and actual inventory can be explained by several factors. The calculated inventory covers over 50 years whereas the actual inventory is from the NMMSS for that date. Also, the calculated inventory is based on available official Department historical information and records, the interpretation of these records, and the potential recording and reporting discrepancies prior to the beginning of the NMMSS in 1965. 7

HIGHLY ENRICHED URANIUM The material balance comprises six primary elements: acquisitions, removals, classified transactions, uranium enrichment process holdup, calculated inventory, and actual inventory. Acquisitions and removals are broken down further into material balance categories. The methodology used to determine the 9/30/2004 calculated HEU inventory is to add the total quantity of acquisitions and classified transactions for the eight-year time period covered in this report to the actual September 30, 1996, inventory (Beginning Inventory) and subtract the total quantity of removals for the eight-year period. The calculated inventory is then compared to the actual inventory at the end of the period. As shown in Table 2, the September 30, 2004, calculated inventory equals the actual inventory. ACQUISITIONS From October 1, 1996, through September 30, 2004, the U.S. acquired only 1.2 MTU-235 in HEU. No HEU was produced from uranium enrichment processes or blending, in keeping with the government s self-imposed moratorium on the production of fissile materials for use in nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices. The 1.2 MTU-235 was acquired primarily from receipts from foreign countries and miscellaneous returns from waste operations. The acquisitions were an increase to the U.S. HEU inventory. REMOVALS In the eight-year period covered by this report, 31.2 MTU-235 contained in HEU was removed from the U.S. inventory. More than 95 percent of this, 29.8 MTU-235, resulted from the downblending of HEU to low enriched uranium (see Table 3 for down-blending activities). The remaining 1.4 MTU-235 was removed from the U.S. inventory by fission and transmutation, normal operating losses, and transfers to foreign countries. It should be noted that no nuclear tests or wartime detonations were conducted during the period, and removal attributed to naval reactor use is not shown in the table for national security reasons. The removals were a decrease to the U.S. HEU inventory. 8

Material Balance Table 3 HEU Disposition Activities Disposition Activities USEC Transfer Program Tennessee Valley Authority Off-Spec Program Research Reactor Supply Program Miscellaneous Dispositions Total, Disposition Program Other Down-Blending Total, Down-Blending MTU-235 As of 9/30/04 13.8 3.8 0.4 11.2 29.2 0.6 29.8 CLASSIFIED TRANSACTIONS 0.2 MTU-235 is added to the calculated inventory to account for classified transactions, which cannot be detailed in this report. CALCULATED INVENTORY The calculated inventory of U-235 in HEU as of September 30, 2004 is 590.5 MTU-235. This is a decrease of 29.8 MTU-235 compared to the actual September 30, 1996 inventory. HEU acquisitions during the eight-year period covered by this report amounted to 1.2 MTU-235. Of the inventory removals during the period, HEU down-blending activities accounted for 29.8 MTU-235, while fission and transmutation, normal operating losses, and transfers to foreign countries accounted for an additional 1.4 MTU-235. Classified transactions accounted for the remaining 0.2 MTU-235. 9

HIGHLY ENRICHED URANIUM This page intentionally blank. 10