Multi-Tenant Isolation and Network Virtualization in. Cloud Data Centers

Similar documents
Virtualization and Software Defined Networking (SDN) for Multi-Cloud Computing

OVERLAYING VIRTUALIZED LAYER 2 NETWORKS OVER LAYER 3 NETWORKS

Protocols for Data Center Network Virtualization and Cloud Computing

Data Center Network Virtualisation Standards. Matthew Bocci, Director of Technology & Standards, IP Division IETF NVO3 Co-chair

WHITE PAPER. Network Virtualization: A Data Plane Perspective

Roman Hochuli - nexellent ag / Mathias Seiler - MiroNet AG

VXLAN: Scaling Data Center Capacity. White Paper

Data Center Overlay Technologies

VXLAN, Enhancements, and Network Integration

Networking Issues For Big Data

CLOUD NETWORKING FOR ENTERPRISE CAMPUS APPLICATION NOTE

Extending Networking to Fit the Cloud

Internet Engineering Task Force Marc Lasserre. Expires: Nov 2014 Thomas Morin France Telecom Orange. Nabil Bitar Verizon. Yakov Rekhter Juniper

DCB for Network Virtualization Overlays. Rakesh Sharma, IBM Austin IEEE 802 Plenary, Nov 2013, Dallas, TX

SDN CONTROLLER. Emil Gągała. PLNOG, , Kraków

ETHERNET VPN (EVPN) NEXT-GENERATION VPN FOR ETHERNET SERVICES

ETHERNET VPN (EVPN) OVERLAY NETWORKS FOR ETHERNET SERVICES

Technology and Trends in Network Virtualization

Software Defined Networking using VXLAN

Network Virtualization for Large-Scale Data Centers

Data Networking and Architecture. Delegates should have some basic knowledge of Internet Protocol and Data Networking principles.

Virtual Private LAN Service on Cisco Catalyst 6500/6800 Supervisor Engine 2T

MPLS VPN Services. PW, VPLS and BGP MPLS/IP VPNs

Cloud Networking Disruption with Software Defined Network Virtualization. Ali Khayam

NVO3: Network Virtualization Problem Statement. Thomas Narten IETF 83 Paris March, 2012

SCLP: Segment-oriented Connection-less Protocol for High-Performance Software Tunneling in Datacenter Networks

Chapter 9. IP Secure

VPLS Technology White Paper HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Issue 01. Date

A Case for Overlays in DCN Virtualization Katherine Barabash, Rami Cohen, David Hadas, Vinit Jain, Renato Recio and Benny Rochwerger IBM

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Orange N. Bitar Verizon Y. Rekhter Juniper October 2014

VXLAN Overlay Networks: Enabling Network Scalability for a Cloud Infrastructure

Application Delivery Networking

Avaya VENA Fabric Connect

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: D. Black EMC L. Fang Microsoft L. Kreeger Cisco M. Napierala AT&T October 2014

Analysis of Network Segmentation Techniques in Cloud Data Centers

VMware Network Virtualization Design Guide. January 2013

Introduction to IP v6

ConnectX -3 Pro: Solving the NVGRE Performance Challenge

Ethernet. Ethernet. Network Devices

Multitenancy Options in Brocade VCS Fabrics

Accelerating Network Virtualization Overlays with QLogic Intelligent Ethernet Adapters

VXLAN Bridging & Routing

Network Virtualization with the Cisco Catalyst 6500/6800 Supervisor Engine 2T

Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6)

Data Center Interconnects. Tony Sue HP Storage SA David LeDrew - HPN

Using Network Virtualization to Scale Data Centers

Cisco Virtual Topology System: Data Center Automation for Next-Generation Cloud Architectures

Data Center Network Topologies

Juniper / Cisco Interoperability Tests. August 2014

MPLS over IP-Tunnels. Mark Townsley Distinguished Engineer. 21 February 2005

Introduction to TCP/IP

IP Networking. Overview. Networks Impact Daily Life. IP Networking - Part 1. How Networks Impact Daily Life. How Networks Impact Daily Life

Rohde & Schwarz R&S SITLine ETH VLAN Encryption Device Functionality & Performance Tests

Expert Reference Series of White Papers. vcloud Director 5.1 Networking Concepts

Network Virtualization Solutions

Cloud Networking From Theory to Practice" Ivan Pepelnjak NIL Data Communications"

Internetworking. Problem: There is more than one network (heterogeneity & scale)

Introduction to MPLS-based VPNs

Guide to TCP/IP, Third Edition. Chapter 3: Data Link and Network Layer TCP/IP Protocols

Transform Your Business and Protect Your Cisco Nexus Investment While Adopting Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure

TRILL for Data Center Networks

Cloud Networking: Framework and VPN Applicability. draft-bitar-datacenter-vpn-applicability-01.txt

Designing and Developing Scalable IP Networks

MPLS Layer 3 and Layer 2 VPNs over an IP only Core. Rahul Aggarwal Juniper Networks. rahul@juniper.net

Communication Systems Internetworking (Bridges & Co)

APPLICATION NOTE 210 PROVIDER BACKBONE BRIDGE WITH TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: A CARRIER ETHERNET TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW

SDN and Data Center Networks

Network Access Control and Cloud Security

Preserve IP Addresses During Data Center Migration

Data Center Infrastructure of the future. Alexei Agueev, Systems Engineer

How To Make A Network Cable Reliable And Secure

13 Virtual Private Networks 13.1 Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) 13.2 Layer 2/3/4 VPNs 13.3 Multi-Protocol Label Switching 13.4 IPsec Transport Mode

Network Security TCP/IP Refresher

Virtual PortChannels: Building Networks without Spanning Tree Protocol

SBSCET, Firozpur (Punjab), India

IP and Mobility. Requirements to a Mobile IP. Terminology in Mobile IP

Wireless Networks: Network Protocols/Mobile IP

Advanced VSAT Solutions Bridge Point-to-Multipoint (BPM) Overview

MPLS VPN over mgre. Finding Feature Information. Prerequisites for MPLS VPN over mgre

Network-Oriented Software Development. Course: CSc4360/CSc6360 Instructor: Dr. Beyah Sessions: M-W, 3:00 4:40pm Lecture 2

Why Software Defined Networking (SDN)? Boyan Sotirov

Interconnecting Data Centers Using VPLS

Virtual Private Networks

Testing Network Virtualization For Data Center and Cloud VERYX TECHNOLOGIES

IP address format: Dotted decimal notation:

EVOLVING ENTERPRISE NETWORKS WITH SPB-M APPLICATION NOTE

vsphere Networking vsphere 6.0 ESXi 6.0 vcenter Server 6.0 EN

How To Make A Vpc More Secure With A Cloud Network Overlay (Network) On A Vlan) On An Openstack Vlan On A Server On A Network On A 2D (Vlan) (Vpn) On Your Vlan

VMware

Ethernet-based Software Defined Network (SDN) Cloud Computing Research Center for Mobile Applications (CCMA), ITRI 雲 端 運 算 行 動 應 用 研 究 中 心

Network layer: Overview. Network layer functions IP Routing and forwarding

ICTTEN6172A Design and configure an IP- MPLS network with virtual private network tunnelling

Riverstone Networks. Carrier Ethernet Standards Progress. Igor Giangrossi Sr. Systems Engineer, CALA

CORD Fabric, Overlay Virtualization, and Service Composition

MPLS over Various IP Tunnels. W. Mark Townsley

The 2013 Guide to Network Virtualization and SDN

VLAN and QinQ Technology White Paper

Network Virtualization

NVGRE Overlay Networks: Enabling Network Scalability for a Cloud Infrastructure

Marc Lasserre Wim Henderickx Alcatel-Lucent. Ali Sajassi Luyuan Fang Cisco. Yuichi Ikejiri NTT Communications. Mircea Pisica BT.

Transcription:

Multi-Tenant Isolation and Network Virtualization in. Cloud Data Centers Raj Jain Washington University in Saint Louis Saint Louis, MO 63130 Jain@cse.wustl.edu These slides and audio/video recordings of this class lecture are at: 13-1

Overview 1. NVO3 2. VXLAN 3. NVGRE 4. STT Note: Data center interconnection and LAN extension techniques are covered in another module which includes OTV, TRILL, and LISP. 13-2

Network Virtualization 1. Network virtualization allows tenants to form an overlay network in a multi-tenant network such that tenant can control: 1. Connectivity layer: Tenant network can be L2 while the provider is L3 and vice versa 2. Addresses: MAC addresses and IP addresses 3. Network Partitions: VLANs and Subnets 4. Node Location: Move nodes freely 2. Network virtualization allows providers to serve a large number of tenants without worrying about: 1. Internal addresses used in client networks 2. Number of client nodes 3. Location of individual client nodes 4. Number and values of client partitions (VLANs and Subnets) 3. Network could be a single physical interface, a single physical machine, a data center, a metro, or the global Internet. 4. Provider could be a system owner, an enterprise, a cloud provider, or a carrier. 13-3

Network Virtualization Techniques Entity Partitioning Aggregation/Extension/Interconnection** NIC SR-IOV MR-IOV Switch VEB, VEPA VSS, VBE, DVS, FEX L2 Link VLANs LACP, Virtual PortChannels L2 Network using L2 VLAN PB (Q-in-Q), PBB (MAC-in-MAC), PBB-TE, Access-EPL, EVPL, EVP-Tree, EVPLAN L2 Network using L3 NVO3, VXLAN, NVGRE, STT MPLS, VPLS, A-VPLS, H-VPLS, PWoMPLS, PWoGRE, OTV, TRILL, LISP, L2TPv3, EVPN, PBB-EVPN Router VDCs, VRF VRRP, HSRP L3 Network using L1 GMPLS, SONET L3 Network using MPLS, GRE, MPLS, T-MPLS, MPLS-TP, GRE, PW, IPSec L3* PW, IPSec Application ADCs Load Balancers *All L2/L3 technologies for L2 Network partitioning and aggregation can also be used for L3 network partitioning and aggregation, respectively, by simply putting L3 packets in L2 payloads. **The aggregation technologies can also be seen as partitioning technologies from the provider point of view. 13-4

NVO3 Network Virtualization Overlays using L3 techniques Problem: Data Center Virtual Private Network (DCVPN) in a multi-tenant datacenter Issues: Scale in Number of Networks: Hundreds of thousands of DCVPNs in a single administrative domain Scale in Number of Nodes: Millions of s on hundred thousands of physical servers (or pm) Migration Support both L2 and L3 VPNs Dynamic provisioning Addressing independence Virtual Private Other tenants do not see your frames Optimal Forwarding (VRRP inefficient in a large network) Ref: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) charter, http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/nvo3/charter/ 13-5

NVO3 Goals Develop a general architectural framework Identify key functional blocks. Indentify alternatives for each functional block Deployments can mix and match these alternatives Analyze which requirements are satisfied by different alternatives Operation, Administration and Management (OAM) 13-6

NVO3 Terminology Tenant System (TS): or pm Virtual Network (VN): L2 or L3 Tenant networks Network Virtualization Edges (NVEs): Entities connecting TSs (virtual/physical switches/routers) Network Virtualization Authority (NVA): Manages forwarding info for a set of NVEs NV Domain: Set of NVEs under one authority NV Region: Set of domains that share some information (to support VNs that span multiple domains) NVA VN NVA TS NVE TS NVE TS NVE Region VN VN NVE NVE VN NVE NVE VN Domain VN NVE 13-7 Domain

NVO3 Components Underlay Network: Provides overlay network service Orchestration Systems: Create new s and associated vswitches and other networking entities and properties. May share this information with NVAs. NVEs could be in vswitches, external pswitches or span both. NVA could be distributed or centralized and replicated. NVEs get information from hypervisors and/or NVA. Hypervisor-to-NVE Protocol (data plane learning) NVE-NVA Protocol: Push or Pull (on-demand) model. Control plane learning. Map and Encap: Find destination NVE (map) and send (encap) Ref: T. Narten, et al., An Architecture for Overlay Networks (NVO3), http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-narten-nvo3-arch/ 13-8

Current NVO Technologies BGP/MPLS IP VPNs: Widely deployed in enterprise networks. Difficult in data centers because hosts/hypervisors do not implement BGP. BGP/MPLS Ethernet VPNs: Deployed in carrier networks. Difficult in data centers. 802.1Q, PB, PBB VLANs Shortest Path Bridging: IEEE 802.1aq Virtual Station Interface (VSI) Discovery and Configuration Protocol (VDP): IEEE 802.1Qbg Address Resolution for Massive numbers of hosts in the Data Center (ARMD): RFC6820 TRILL L2VPN: Provider provisioned L2 VPN Proxy Mobile IP: Does not support multi-tenancy LISP: RFC 6830 13-9

GRE Generic Routing Encaptulation (RFC 1701/1702) Generic X over Y for any X or Y Over IPv4, GRE packets use a protocol type of 47 Optional Checksum, Loose/strict Source Routing, Key Key is used to authenticate the source Recursion Control: # of additional encapsulations allowed. 0 Restricted to a single provider network end-to-end Offset: Points to the next source route field to be used IP or IPSec are commonly used as delivery headers Delivery Header GRE Header Payload Checksum Present Routing Present Key Present Seq. # Present Strict Source Route Recursion Control Flags Ver. # Prot. Type Offset Check sum Key Seq. # Source Routing List 1b 1b 1b 1b 1b 3b 5b 3b 16b 16b 16b 32b 32b Variable 13-10

EoMPLSoGRE Ethernet over MPLS over GRE (point-to-point) VPLS over MPLS over GRE (Multipoint-to-multipoint) Used when provider offers only L3 connectivity Subscribers use their own MPLS over GRE tunnels VPLSoGRE or Advanced-VPLSoGRE can also be used GRE offers IPSec encryption option Customer MPLS Router Provider Edge Router Provider Core Router(s) Tunnel Provider Network Provider Edge Router Customer MPLS Router Ethernet IP GRE MPLS Ethernet = IP GRE MPLS Ethernet Ethernet 13-11

NVGRE Ethernet over GRE over IP (point-to-point) A unique 24-bit Virtual Subnet Identifier (VSID) is used as the lower 24-bits of GRE key field 2 24 tenants can share Unique IP multicast address is used for BUM (Broadcast, Unknown, Multicast) traffic on each VSID Equal Cost Multipath (ECMP) allowed on point-to-point tunnels Customer Edge Switch Provider Edge Router Provider Core Router(s) Tunnel Provider Network Provider Edge Router Customer Edge Switch Ethernet IP GRE Ethernet = IP GRE Ethernet Ethernet Ref: M. Sridharan, MVGRE: Network Virtualization using GRE, Aug 2013, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sridharan-virtualization-nvgre-03 13-12

NVGRE (Cont) In a cloud, a pswitch or a vswitch can serve as tunnel endpoint s need to be in the same VSID to communicate s in different VSIDs can have the same MAC address Inner IEEE 802.1Q tag, if present, is removed. 10.20.2.1 10.20.2.2 10.20.2.3 10.20.2.4 10.20.2.5 10.20.2.6 Virtual Subnet 10.20.2.X 10.20.1.1 10.20.1.2 10.20.1.3 10.20.1.4 10.20.1.5 10.20.1.6 Virtual Subnet 10.20.1.X Subnet 192.168.1.X Subnet 192.168.2.X Subnet 192.168.3.X Internet Ref: Emulex, NVGRE Overlay Networks: Enabling Network Scalability, Aug 2012, 11pp., http://www.emulex.com/artifacts/074d492d-9dfa-42bd-9583-69ca9e264bd3/elx_wp_all_nvgre.pdf 13-13

VXLAN Virtual extensible Local Area Networks (VXLAN) L3 solution to isolate multiple tenants in a data center (L2 solution is Q-in-Q and MAC-in-MAC) Developed by ware. Supported by many companies in IETF NVO3 working group Problem: 4096 VLANs are not sufficient in a multi-tenant data center Tenants need to control their MAC, VLAN, and IP address assignments Overlapping MAC, VLAN, and IP addresses Spanning tree is inefficient with large number of switches Too many links are disabled Better throughput with IP equal cost multipath (ECMP) Ref: M. Mahalingam, VXLAN: A Framework for Overlaying Virtualized Layer 2 Networks over Layer 3 Networks, draft-mahalingam-dutt-dcops-vxlan-04, May, 8, 2013, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mahalingam-dutt-dcops-vxlan-04 13-14

VXLAN Architecture Create a virtual L2 overlay (called VXLAN) over L3 networks 2 24 VXLAN Network Identifiers (VNIs) Only s in the same VXLAN can communicate vswitches serve as VTEP (VXLAN Tunnel End Point). Encapsulate L2 frames in UDP over IP and send to the destination VTEP(s). Segments may have overlapping MAC addresses and VLANs but L2 traffic never crosses a VNI Tenant 3 Virtual L2 Network Tenant 1 Virtual L2 Network Tenant 2 Virtual L2 Network L3 Network 13-15

VXLAN Deployment Example Example: Three tenants. 3 VNIs. 4 Tunnels for unicast. + 3 tunnels for multicast (not shown) 1-1 VNI 34 2-1 VNI 22 2-2 VNI 22 1-2 VNI 34 3-1 VNI 74 3-2 VNI 74 1-3 VNI 34 Hypervisor VTEP IP1 Hypervisor VTEP IP2 Hypervisor VTEP IP3 L3 Network 13-16

VXLAN Encapsulation Format Outer VLAN tag is optional. Used to isolate VXLAN traffic on the LAN Source ARPs to find Destination s MAC address. All L2 multicasts/unknown are sent via IP multicast. Destination sends a standard IP unicast ARP response. Destination VTEP learns inner-src-mac-to-outer-src-ip mapping Avoids unknown destination flooding for returning responses Dest. VTEP MAC Source VTEP MAC Outer VLAN Dest. VTEP IP Source VTEP IP UDP Header VXLAN Header Dest MAC Source MAC Tenant VLAN Ethernet Payload Only key fields are shown Flags Res VNI Res 8b 24b 24b 8b 13-17

VXLAN Encapsulation Format (Cont) IGMP is used to prune multicast trees 7 of 8 bits in the flag field are reserved. I flag bit is set if VNI field is valid UDP source port is a hash of the inner MAC header Allows load balancing using Equal Cost Multi Path using L3-L4 header hashing s are unaware that they are operating on VLAN or VXLAN VTEPs need to learn MAC address of other VTEPs and of client s of VNIs they are handling. A VXLAN gateway switch can forward traffic to/from non- VXLAN networks. Encapsulates or decapsulates the packets. 13-18

VXLAN: Summary VXLAN solves the problem of multiple tenants with overlapping MAC addresses, VLANs, and IP addresses in a cloud environment. A server may have s belonging to different tenants No changes to s. Hypervisors responsible for all details. Uses UDP over IP encapsulation to isolate tenants 13-19

Stateless Transport Tunneling Protocol (STT) Ethernet over TCP-Like over IP tunnels. GRE, IPSec tunnels can also be used if required. Tunnel endpoints may be inside the end-systems (vswitches) Designed for large storage blocks 64kB. Fragmentation allowed. Most other overlay protocols use UDP and disallow fragmentation Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) issues. TCP-Like: Stateless TCP Header identical to TCP (same protocol number 6) but no 3-way handshake, no connections, no windows, no retransmissions, no congestion state Stateless Transport (recognized by standard port number). Broadcast, Unknown, Multicast (BUM) handled by IP multicast tunnels Ref: B. Davie and J. Gross, "A Stateless Transport Tunneling Protocol for Network Virtualization (STT)," Sep 2013, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-davie-stt-04 13-20

LSO and LRO Large Send Offload (LSO): Host hands a large chunk of data to NIC and meta data. NIC makes MSS size segments, adds checksum, TCP, IP, and MAC headers to each segment. Large Receive Offload (LRO): NICs attempt to reassemble multiple TCP segments and pass larger chunks to the host. Host does the final reassembly with fewer per packet operations. STT takes advantage of LSO and LRO features, if available. Using a protocol number other than 6 will not allow LSO/LRO to handle STT Host Meta Data Payload LSO LRO L2 Header IP Header TCP Header Segment 13-21

STT Optimizations Large data size: Less overhead per payload byte Context ID: 64-bit tunnel end-point identifier Optimizations: 2-byte padding is added to Ethernet frames to make its size a multiple of 32-bits. Source port is a hash of the inner header ECMP with each flow taking different path and all packets of a flow taking one path No protocol type field Payload assumed to be Ethernet, which can carry any payload identified by protocol type. vnic vnic vswitch NIC Underlay Network NIC vswitch vnic vnic 13-22

STT Frame Format 16-Bit MSS 2 16 B = 64K Byte maximum L4 Offset: From the of STT header to the start of encapsulated L4 (TCP/UDP) header Helps locate payload quickly Checksum Verified: Checksum covers entire payload and valid Checksum Partial: Checksum only includes TCP/IP headers IP Header TCP-Like Header STT Header STT Payload Version Flags L4 Offset Reserved Maximum Priority VLAN ID Segment Code Valid Size Point 13-23 Context ID 8b 8b 8b 8b 16b 3b 1b 64b 12b Checksum Verified Checksum Partial IP Version IPv4 TCP Payload 1b 1b 1b 1b 4b Reserved VLAN ID Padding 16b

TCP-Like Header in STT Destination Port: Standard to be requested from IANA Source Port: Selected for efficient ECMP Ack Number: STT payload sequence identifier. Same in all segments of a payload Sequence Number (32b): Length of STT Payload (16b) + offset of the current segment (16b) Correctly handled by NICs with Large Receive Offload (LRO) feature No acks. STT delivers partial payload to higher layers. Higher layer TCP can handle retransmissions if required. Middle boxes will need to be programmed to allow STT pass through Source Port (Random) Dest. Port (Standard) STT Payload Length Sequence Number* Segment Offset Payload Sequence # Ack Number* Data Offset 16b 16b 16b+16b 32b 16b *Different meaning than TCP 13-24

STT Summary STT solves the problem of efficient transport of large 64 KB storage blocks Uses Ethernet over TCP-Like over IP tunnels Designed for software implementation in hypervisors 13-25

Summary 1. NVO3 is a generalized framework for network virtualization and partitioning for multiple tenants over L3. It covers both L2 and L3 connectivity. 2. NVGRE uses Ethernet over GRE for L2 connectivity. 3. VXLAN uses Ethernet over UDP over IP 4. STT uses Ethernet over TCP-like stateless protocol over IP. 13-26

Reading List B. Davie and J. Gross, "A Stateless Transport Tunneling Protocol for Network Virtualization (STT)," Sep 2013, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draftdavie-stt-04 Emulex, NVGRE Overlay Networks: Enabling Network Scalability, Aug 2012, 11pp., http://www.emulex.com/artifacts/074d492d-9dfa-42bd-9583-69ca9e264bd3/elx_wp_all_nvgre.pdf M. Mahalingam, VXLAN: A Framework for Overlaying Virtualized Layer 2 Networks over Layer 3 Networks, draft-mahalingam-dutt-dcops-vxlan- 04, May, 8, 2013, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mahalingam-dutt-dcopsvxlan-04 M. Sridharan, MVGRE: Network Virtualization using GRE, Aug 2013, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sridharan-virtualization-nvgre-03 Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) charter, http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/nvo3/charter/ T. Narten, et al., An Architecture for Overlay Networks (NVO3), http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-narten-nvo3-arch/ V. Josyula, M. Orr, and G. Page, Cloud Computing: Automating the Virtualized Data Center, Cisco Press, 2012, 392 pp., ISBN: 1587204347. 13-27

Wikipedia Links http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/generic_routing_encapsulation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/locator/identifier_separation_prot ocol http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/large_segment_offload http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/large_receive_offload 13-28

Acronyms ARMD Address Resolution for Massive numbers of hosts in the Data center ARP Address Resolution Protocol BGP Border Gateway Protocol BUM Broadcast, Unknown, Multicast DCN Data Center Networks DCVPN Data Center Virtual Private Network ECMP Equal Cost Multi Path EoMPLSoGRE Ethernet over MPLS over GRE EVPN Ethernet Virtual Private Network GRE Generic Routing Encapsulation IANA Internet Address and Naming Authority ID Identifier IEEE Institution of Electrical and Electronic Engineers IETF Internet Engineering Task Force 13-29

Acronyms (Cont) IGMP Internet Group Multicast Protocol IP Internet Protocol IPSec IP Security IPv4 Internet Protocol V4 LAN Local Area Network LISP Locator ID Separation Protocol LRO Large Receive Offload LSO Large Send Offload MAC Media Access Control MPLS Multi Protocol Label Switching MSS Maximum Segment Size MTU Maximum Transmission Unit NIC Network Interface Card NV Network Virtualization NVA Network Virtualization Authority NVEs Network Virtualization Edge 13-30

Acronyms (Cont) NVGRE Network Virtualization Using GRE NVO3 Network Virtualization over L3 OAM Operation, Administration and Management OTV Overlay Transport Virtualization PB Provider Bridges PBB Provider Backbone Bridge pm Physical Machine pswitch Physical Switch QoS Quality of Service RFC Request for Comment RS Routing System STT Stateless Transport Tunneling Protocol TCP Transmission Control Protocol TRILL Transparent Routing over Lots of Links TS Tenant System UDP User Datagram Protocol 13-31

Acronyms (Cont) VDP VSI Discovery and Configuration Protocol VLAN Virtual Local Area Network Virtual Machine VN Virtual Network VNI Virtual Network Identifier VPLS Virtual Private LAN Service VPLSoGRE Virtual Private LAN Service over GRE VPLSoGRE VPLS over GRE VPN Virtual Private Network VRRP Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol VSI Virtual Station Interface VSID Virtual Subnet Identifier vswitch Virtual Switch VTEP VXLAN Tunnel End Point VXLAN Virtual Extensible Local Area Network 13-32