SANTA BARBARA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LOMPOC AREA



Similar documents
Post-Wildfire Clean-Up and Response in Houston Toad Habitat Best Management Practices

Mission Canyon Residential Design Guidelines Workshop. Table Focus: Environmental Issues and Concerns

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

Corridor Goals and Objectives

March Prepared by: Irvine Ranch Water District Sand Canyon Avenue. Irvine, CA Contact: Natalie Likens (949)

understanding Sustainable Landscaping & Tree Preservation Standards

CITY OF UKIAH TREE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES TREE MANAGEMENT POLICIES FOR THE PROTECTION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF CITY PROPERTY

B. Improve the appearance and character of areas surrounding new development.

Revising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan

HARDWICK TOWNSHIP WARREN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

Kirkland Zoning Code

Chapter 3 SENSITIVE AREAS AND VEGETATED CORRIDORS

How To Plan A Buffer Zone

Addendum D. Nomination of Moody Wash ACEC

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY. Staff: Claudette Grant

sdci Seattle Permits Tip Tree Protection Regulations in Seattle CATEGORIES OF TREES AFFECTED IDENTIFYING TREE TYPES ON YOUR PROPERTY

Appendix C. Municipal Planning and Site Restoration Considerations

4.2 Buena Vista Creek Watershed

Summary of the Heritage Tree Ordinance Updated July 2013

Summary of Pacific Northwest Municipal Tree Regulations Prepared by Seattle DPD in conjunction with Sound Tree Solutions February 8, 2010

Appendix A: Land Protection Plan

Restoration. a brief look at

City Code of ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN Chapter 55 Zoning

28.0 Development Permit Area #2 (Neighbourhood District)

III. Vision and Goals

TOWN OF VINALHAVEN LAND USE ORDINANCE SECTION 19 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES

Experienced Planning and Design

DALEY RANCH CONSERVATION BANK CREDIT PURCHASE APPLICATION. CREDIT TYPE NUMBER LOCATION OF PROJECT Chaparral / Coastal Sage Scrub

3.0 Table of Development Note: This table must be read in conjunction with the explanation provided in Part 5, Division 1, Chapter 2 Using Domains.

Chapter 7 ZONING PLAN

18 voting members 44 stakeholders 114 list. Senators: Wyden & Merkley Representative DeFazio

DOUGLAS COUNTY ZONING RESOLUTION Section 5 RR - Rural Residential District 3/10/99. -Section Contents-

Industrial Suburban District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Plan

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APRIL 9, 2015

Heritage Place Code. Heritage Place Code

Multiple Species Conservation Program County of San Diego. A Case Study in Environmental Planning & The Economic Value of Open Space

AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE

TREE PERMIT APPLICATION Private Property- Section MBMC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

6. NATURAL AREAS FIRE MANAGEMENT

Adopted 9/23/98 CHATTAHOOCHEE CORRIDOR PLAN. The goals of the Chattahoochee Corridor Plan (hereinafter also referred to as the Plan ) are:

Angora Fire Restoration Activities June 24, Presented by: Judy Clot Forest Health Enhancement Program

APPENDIX F RIGHTS-OF-WAY PRESERVATION GUIDELINES

INTRODUCTION TO ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS

Model Subdivision and Land Development (SALDO) Subdivision/ Land Development Presentation Overview. Why Subdivision and Land Development Regulations?

SPECIAL USE PERMIT JCSA Groundwater Treatment Facility Staff Report for the November 5, 2001, Planning Commission Public Hearing

FILING REQUIREMENTS EXCERPTS FROM THE ZONING ORDINANCE SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS

4. Priority Areas of Conservation

2008 Compensatory Mitigation Rule: Overview and Highlights. Jenny Thomas U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Wetlands Division July 2014

Management Plan Template For Conservation Easements Held by CPW

RESTORATION & REVITALIZATION

TOWN OF MONSON CERTIFICATIONS-SPECIAL TOWN MEETING MAY 11, 2015

Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance Waiver and Exception Process Guidance for Activities in the Resource Protection Area (RPA)

3 September 9, 2015 Public Hearing

First Annual Centennial Strategy for. Yucca House National Monument

Colorado Natural Heritage Program

Los Angeles Union Station, CA Sustainable Neighborhood Assessment. April 22-23, 2014

LIVING LANDS Helping Land Trusts Conserve Biodiversity

COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT

Council Policy for New Telecommunication Facilities

Goal 1 To protect the public health, safety and property from the harmful effects of natural disasters.

APPENDIX G. California Coastal Commission & Conservancy Accessibility Standards

DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES OAK TREES CARE AND MAINTENANCE

Background research on the topic of urban forestry is intended to

VANDERBILT COMPARISON

House Code. House Code

City of Colleyville Community Development Department. Site/Landscape Plan Application Packet

STATEMENT OF RON HUNTSINGER NATIONAL SCIENCE COORDINATOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT U.S

King Fire Restoration Project, Eldorado National Forest, Placer and El Dorado Counties, Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

GLOSSARY OF TERMS CHAPTER 11 WORD DEFINITION SOURCE. Leopold

Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area (CBPA) in Virginia Beach, Virginia. The Resource Protection Area (RPA) and Buffers The First 100 Feet

Application No.: Steve Rush, representing Rocky Mountain Power Rocky Mountain Power Project Location: approximately 1600 N E.

PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING TLZM LEEGATE November 1, 2013

Revere Beach Transit-Oriented Development Parcels Revere, Massachusetts. Design and Development Guidelines. Part Two.

Development proposals will require to demonstrate, according to scale, type and location, that they:-

A-2, RURAL ESTATE-AGRICULTURE DISTRICT

720 Contour Grading. General. References. Resources. Definitions

DOÑA ANA COUNTY DESIGN STORM CRITERIA GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL SITES. Run-off Analysis Methods

SUPPLEMENTARY EVIDENCE OF SHONA CLAIRE MYERS ON BEHALF OF THE KAPITI COAST DISTRICT COUNCIL. Terrestrial ecology. DATE: 3 February 2012

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

SEC PURPOSE. SEC DEFINITIONS. SEC COLLABORATIVE FOREST LANDSCAPE RESTORATION PROGRAM.

b. Location of Designator. Designators for Special Area Regulations shall follow the designators for the Development Regulations.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUMMARY OF ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS

FILE NO.: Z-6915-C. Gamble Road Short-form PCD and Land Alteration Variance Request

FAIRFAX WATER OCCOQUAN RESERVOIR SHORELINE EASEMENT POLICY. February 17, 2011

Using Aerial Photography to Measure Habitat Changes. Method

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: November 7, 2013

Transcription:

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LOMPOC AREA A. LAND USE ELEMENT INTERPRETIVE GUIDELINES B. COMMUNITY BENEFITS C. COUNTY ACTION ITEMS Adopted by the Board of Supervisors November 9, 1999

A. Santa Barbara County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element LOMPOC AREA GOALS INTERPRETIVE GUIDELINES The purpose of these guidelines is to further implementation of the Santa Barbara County Comprehensive Plan s Lompoc Area Goals of the Land Use Element (pp. 119-123), by providing clear and consistent interpretation of the Comprehensive Plan. These Guidelines pertain to proposals for development in the Urban Area of the Vandenberg Village-Mesa Oaks- Lompoc Wye area as shown as the Northern Lompoc Unincorporated Urban Area in Figure 1. There are other Comprehensive Plan policies and guidelines and Lompoc Area Goals that apply to development in this area. Additional measures may be required to achieve consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Fire Protection Goal: Growth and employment must be consistent with the preservation and enhancement of resources and environmental quality. Goal: Unique ecological areas should be identified and preserved. A-1. A-2. Development adjacent to the Burton Mesa Preserve and other chaparral areas adjacent to the Preserve should include prevention measures such as Class A roofs, interior sprinklers, adequate access to the urban/rural interface, and structural setbacks (minimum 100 feet) from these high fire hazard areas. Setbacks for fire protection shall occur on private property. It is preferred to locate the setback on a common open space lot in order to avoid conflicts with owners of future individual lots. Access for Fire Department equipment may be provided within this setback and landscaping within this area should not impede the use of such equipment. Paved roads and trails may be allowed within the setback. Fencing within the structural setback should be comprised of fire resistant material to minimize fire hazards. Fuel Modification Zones that call for selective thinning and removal of down and dead materials should not be located through riparian or wetland areas or result in the removal of healthy specimen oaks. Within the Fuel Modification Zones, treatment of oak trees should be limited to limbing the branches up to a height of 6 feet, removing deadwood, and mowing the understory. Where specimen oaks have multiple trunks, all trunks should remain. Specimen trees are defined in the Board of Supervisors adopted Environmental Threshold and Guidelines Manual (January 1995) as: mature trees that are healthy and structurally sound and have grown into the natural stature particular to that species. For oaks on the Burton Mesa this should be considered as trees having one or more 4- inch diameter trunk(s) at a height four feet above the ground. 1

A-3. Development adjacent to the Burton Mesa Ecological Preserve and other undeveloped natural open space within high fire hazard areas should be sited and designed to minimize habitat alteration on the Preserve. Toward that end, Fuel Modification Zones should be designed to occur on private land rather than on the Preserve itself. Biology Goal: Growth and employment must be consistent with the preservation and enhancement of resources and environmental quality. Goal: Unique ecological areas should be identified and preserved. Goal: The unique character of the area should be protected and enhanced with particular emphasis on protection of agricultural lands, grazing lands, and natural amenities. Goal: Changes in natural or re-established topography, vegetation, biological communities should be minimized in an attempt to avoid the destruction of natural habitats. Goal: Scenic areas, such as ocean frontage, mountainous areas, streams, and lands immediately adjacent to these areas should be preserved by their being included in the County's public and private open space land programs. Goal: Encourage wildlife sanctuaries. A-4. A-5. A-6. A-7. To the maximum extent feasible, development on the edge of the Burton Mesa Ecological Preserve should be designed to avoid damage to Burton Mesa Chaparral, riparian areas, and established oak trees by incorporating setbacks, clustering or other appropriate methods. Rare, threatened, and endangered species, and species of local concern that inhabit these natural communities should be protected. Areas protected from grading, paving, and other disturbances should include the area 6 feet outside established native tree driplines, unless this distance would interfere with reasonable development of a property. Where native trees are removed, they should be replaced with natives of the Burton Mesa in a manner consistent with County standards. Landscaping for development on the edge of the Preserve and other designated natural undeveloped open space areas should include trees and shrubs native to the Burton Mesa, with habitat restoration efforts focused on buffers. Landscaping with highly invasive weedy plants (e.g., iceplant, pampas grass, veldt grass, Monterey pine, eucalyptus, spiny clotbur, and Australian fireweed) should be avoided. Development should be sited and designed to avoid disruption and fragmentation of significant natural resources, minimize removal of oaks and Bishop Pines and other significant native vegetation, preserve wildlife corridors, and provide reasonable levels of habitat restoration. Recognizing that many animals that depend on the riparian system of streams also depend upon the adjacent upland habitat often exceeding 100 feet from streams, 2

development should be sited and buffered to the greatest extent feasible from riparian areas known to support such species, while preserving reasonable use of the property. A-8 Where avoidance has been achieved to the maximum extent feasible, impacts to Burton Mesa Chaparral may be mitigated at ratios of 3:1 for high quality chaparral, 2:1 for moderate quality, and 1.5:1 for degraded chaparral. 1 Mitigation may take the form of 1) habitat restoration either inside the State s Ecological Preserve or in a permanently protected area outside the Preserve, or 2) in-lieu fees that would fund habitat restoration and/or management in the Preserve. However, state and federal laws requiring protection of Threatened and Endangered Species may preclude such mitigation strategies in some cases. The three classes of Burton Mesa Chaparral are defined as follows: High Quality Chaparral includes areas that have very little evidence of disturbance (excluding fire), and are contiguous with larger habitat areas. Moderate Quality Chaparral includes areas that are somewhat disturbed (i.e., have a road, trails, or populations of non-native species) or are fragmented, but still contain a high proportion of established chaparral species. Degraded Chaparral includes areas that show extensive evidence of disturbance, and are either very small or isolated, or that support a low cover of typical chaparral dominants, but still provide some habitat value. Multi-Purpose Trails and Transit Linkages Goal: Develop a comprehensive countywide transportation system which will provide alternative forms of transportation for all residents and reduce dependence on the automobile. A-9. In order to provide community cohesiveness, new neighborhoods should be designed to provide public multi-purpose trails and transit-linkages to existing neighborhoods, schools, parks, and commercial areas. Open Space Goal: Scenic areas, such as ocean frontage, mountainous areas, streams, and lands immediately adjacent to these areas should be preserved by their being included in the County's public and private open space land programs. Goal: Design future parks to be natural areas with minimal maintenance. A-10. Development adjacent to open space areas should be sited and designed to protect and enhance the natural resources of these areas. 1 This is generally based upon the California Endangered Species Act Memorandum of Understanding by and between the California Department of Fish and Game and the Central Coast Water Authority (Ref. No. 9322), dated November 16, 1994. 3

Visual Goal: The natural backdrop of the area should be preserved through strict controls on hillside development. Hillside grading over 30 percent on residential and commercial land should be severely restricted. Goal: Development, construction, and roads cut in steep areas should be limited to ensure safety and protection of the terrain, as well as environmental and scenic values. A-11. New homes on lots on the edge of bluff tops and in other locations that are highly visible to the public should be of single story or partial second story design to minimize impacts to public view corridors. Where such sites are also constrained by unique biological resources, two-story homes may be allowed where public views are protected by extensive landscaping. A-12. All development, including buildings, understories, fences, water tanks and retaining walls adjacent to designated natural open space areas should be sited and designed to protect the visual character of these areas and blend in with natural landforms through the use of such methods as setbacks, building orientation, materials and colors (earth tones and non-reflective paints), landscape buffers, shielded exterior lighting, screening of parking areas and inclusion of perimeter roads to allow maintenance of open space corridors. A-13. Sound wall construction should be minimized through the alternative use of landscape berms for noise reduction. 4

B. Santa Barbara County COMMUNITY BENEFITS FOR DEVELOPMENTS IN THE VANDENBERG VILLAGE-MESA OAKS-LOMPOC WYE AREA To further implementation of the Comprehensive Plan, particularly the Lompoc Area Goals of the Land Use Element (pp 119-123), and in order to make the finding of community benefit as required under Section 35-487.5 of Santa Barbara County s Article III (inland) Zoning Ordinance, projects involving rezones shall provide the following community benefits as appropriate and feasible. Projects not involving rezones are also encouraged to include these public benefits. Parks Goal: Provide facilities for a maximum variety of recreational activities for all age levels within a reasonable distance of the place of residence, so separated and protected as to avoid conflicts between the different types of activities. Goal: Develop an adequate day-use park for the Mission Hills area in the vicinity east of the present housing development Goal: Establish trails for horses and hiking so that they are compatible with surrounding uses. B-1. To the maximum extent feasible, development projects should dedicate land and construct, public or privately developed parks, athletic fields, and trails for public use. Examples include playing fields, basketball courts, playground equipment, etc. Developers and the County shall work together to provide regional park facilities in accordance with the findings of the Regional Needs Assessment for Parks as adopted by the Board of Supervisors. 5

Open Space Goal: Scenic areas, such as ocean frontage, mountainous areas, streams, and lands immediately adjacent to these areas should be preserved by their being included in the County's public and private open space land programs. Goal: Development, construction, and roads cut in steep areas should be limited to ensure safety and protection of the terrain, as well as environmental and scenic values. Goal: Design future parks to be natural areas with minimal maintenance. B-2. Development projects should include public and/or private open space dedications that preserve natural areas. Affordable Housing B-3. Tract maps and development plans should provide affordable units distributed throughout the sites, at a minimum, consistent with the County s adopted affordable housing goals for the Lompoc Housing Market Area. These units should be similar in appearance to the market rate units. Emphasis should be placed on meeting the unmet income levels of the Lompoc Housing Element Guidelines as they may be amended. 6

C. COUNTY ACTION ITEMS IN THE VANDENBERG VILLAGE-MESA OAKS-LOMPOC WYE AREA C-1 The County should conduct a Regional Needs Assessment for Parks in the Lompoc Area and develop a plan for construction of public parks utilizing partnerships with private developers, the City of Lompoc, and other jurisdictions; develop a fee study and consider an update of the Lompoc Quimby Fee and the Lompoc Park Development Mitigation Fee. The plan for construction of public parks should include consideration of the two potential sites identified below in C-2 and C-3, and on land that is now privately owned and may be proposed for development in the future. C-2 The County should work with the community and the City of Lompoc to develop a public park, including athletic fields on a publicly owned 11- acre site on Harris Grade Road west of the Mesa Oaks Community. C-3. The County should work with the State Lands Commission to develop a 5- acre public park for the Mission Hills community on the Burton Mesa Preserve near Rucker Road and Burton Mesa Boulevard. G:\GROUP\COMP\WP\LOMPOC\ACTN3.DOC 7