Violence Against Women Education Project



Similar documents
Programs for Self-Represented Litigants

Violence Against Women Education Project

Elkins Family Law Task Force

UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA, Rotary Ambassadorial Scholar, Derechos Humanos de Andalucia: Human Rights in Romani Communities

CALIFORNIA PROTECTIVE ORDERS

WENDY M. SEIDEN Associate Clinical Professor

Proposal for Judicial Training. State Courts and the Protection of Immigrant Crime Victims and Children

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COURTS/DOCKETS AND FUNDING. February 6, 2015

About the Authors. CEB book: California Juvenile Dependency Practice 2015

About the Authors; Consultants

WHITE PAPER ON THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM FOR THE ELDER JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL

Regional Family Justice Center Network Concept Paper June 2007

Purpose of the Victim/Witness Unit

Domestic Violence Court Self-Assessment: Revisiting Goals, Challenges and Progress

Training Announcement: State Courts and the Protection of Immigrant Crime Victims and Children

INVITATION TO COMMENT W16-09

The NH Court System excerpts taken from

How To Defend A Domestic Violence Case

court. However, without your testimony the defendant might go unpunished.

Victim Services Programs. Core Service Definitions

FEDERALISM THE SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IN THE UNITED STATES

CURRICULUM VITA RODNEY F. KINGSNORTH

a complicated court structure. Having their cases handled in this way cost them time and money, led to confusion and jeopardized their safety.

Appendix A JUDICIAL BRANCH EDUCATION STANDARDS

Professor s Contact Information. General Course Information. Domestic Violence Law Seminar LAW 837E LS1 Tamara B. Abrams Term Spring 2014 Meetings

HITTING BACK AT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

Crime Hurts Everyone We Can Help

DEBORAH J. CHASE, J.D.,

HON. GRETCHEN W. TAYLOR, JUDGE RETIRED

Domestic Violence: Can the Legal System Help Protect Me?

Court Case Management System (CCMS)

Stearns County, MN Repeat Felony Domestic Violence Court

The Texas Judicial System. Criminal Appeals, in Courts of Appeals, in District Courts, in County Courts, in

FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT Chief David L. Perry

*I am admitted to practice law in Connecticut, Colorado and the U.S. Federal Court.

CALIFORNIA COURTS AND THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM

Illinois Family Violence Coordinating Councils

CURRICULUM VITA. SIDNEY KEITH NELSON, Ph.D. July 2014 Licensed Psychologist - PSY6474

THOMAS P. ALONGI Owner, Alongi & Donovan Law, PLLC 4015 S McClintock Dr #106, Tempe, AZ (480) tom@alongidonovanlaw.

Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles

Section Council Scope Notes Revised September 2006

How To Be Recognized By The National White Women'S Lawyers Association

Supervised Visitation

Andrejs Berzins 15 Wendover Avenue Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1S 4Z

Multiple perspectives on battered mothers and their children fleeing to the United States for safety A study of Hague Convention cases

Supreme Court of Appeals State of West Virginia

EDUCATION California State University, Chico: Bachelor of Arts, Political Science, 1977

State of Oklahoma Child Death Review Legislation. Title 10.Children Section Link:

Nonprofit Organizations

David Ewing Wald Curriculum Vitae

Understanding Nebraska's Protection Orders

Disability and Guardianship Project 9420 Reseda Blvd. #240 Northridge, CA (818)

TESTIMONY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL ANNE MILGRAM JOINT MEETING OF THE ASSEMBLY JUDICIARY AND LAW & PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEES MARCH 12, 2009

KAREN J. LEVITT, ESQ.

Morgan County Prosecuting Attorney Debra MH McLaughlin

Victim Services Program:

January 26, 2015 Presented by Rose Mukhar, Pro Bono Attorney

CURRICULUM VITAE FRANK D. RUSSO

D.V., Threat, and Working with CPS (W6)

Sexual Assault & The Juvenile Court Process A Guide for Victims/Survivors & Their Families

California s Domestic Violence & Mandatory Reporting Law: Requirements for Health Care Practitioners

Domestic Violence Case Management Plan

New Domestic Violence Policies: Implications for Social Work Practice

Issue Brief. Arizona State Senate LEGAL DECISION-MAKING AND PARENTING TIME INTRODUCTION DETERMINING LEGAL DECISION-MAKING AND PARENTING TIME

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA County of Sacramento th Street Sacramento, CA (916) Website

System Improvement Plan

Youth and the Law. Presented by The Crime Prevention Unit

MARYLAND STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR COURT-APPOINTED LAWYERS REPRESENTING CHILDREN IN CUSTODY CASES

Domestic Violence Laws and the Illinois Domestic Violence Act

The Texas District and County Attorneys Association August, 2010

Statewide Domestic Violence Initiatives

UTAH LEGAL SERVICES, INC. Core Case Service Priorities December 2014

CHATHAM COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN S SERVICES

SDVCJ Grant Program Consultation Framing Paper

Child Abuse, Child Neglect:

Violence Against Women Formula Grants

Margaret M. Hand Hartog, Baer & Hand, PC 4 Orinda Way, Suite 250 B Orinda, California mmhand@hbh.law. Telephone (925)

INVITATION TO COMMENT SPR12-11

PENNSYLVANIA COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

THOMAS B. HEFFELFINGER

Distinguished Professor of Judicial Studies, Washington and Lee University School of Law, 2007 present)

RESUME ADDRESS: DISTRICT ATTORNEY S OFFICE, 70 WEST HEDDING SJ CA Lowell High School, San Francisco, Ca. Graduated 3.0 GPA

As Amended by Senate Committee SENATE BILL No. 408

California Mandated Reporting Requirements

Federal, State and Local GOV Agencies Where Berkeley Law Students Have Done Summer Internships. Alameda County Public Defender Oakland California

The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report:

We Can Help. Crime Hurts Everybody. California Victim Compensation Program. Helping California Crime Victims Since 1965

WORLD CONGRESS ON ADULT GUARDIANSHIP

Legal Resources. Resource Guide (Revised 2/11/2014) Developed by NAMI Sonoma County:

Juvenile Defense Attorney Interim Committee

Ethical Considerations for Tribal Lawyers and Judges

Good practices and tools for use in case management, including by front-line law enforcement authorities responding to trafficking in persons

Maryland Courts, Criminal Justice, and Civil Matters

CURRICULUM VITAE THE HONORABLE JUDGE KIMBERLY S. TAYLOR

INVITATION TO COMMENT SPR15-16

Helen Harberts 588 Grand Teton Way Chico CA c: f:

CUSTODY AND VISITATION

Protective Orders Including: Order of Protection and Injunction Against Harassment

STATE OF NEVADA Department of Administration Division of Human Resource Management CLASS SPECIFICATION

Transcription:

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA Center for Families, Children & the Courts 455 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102-3688 Tel 415-865-4200 TDD 415-865-4272 Fax 415-865-4205 www.courts.ca.gov Support for this publication was provided by the California Governor s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) through Grant Award Number CW14131535, awarded to the Judicial Council of California. Points of view in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of Cal OES. FACT SHEET September 2015 Violence Against Women Education Project Domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, and teen dating violence are critical issues facing family, criminal, and juvenile courts in California. The Violence Against Women Education Project (VAWEP) is an initiative designed to provide tribal and state courts with information, equipment, technical assistance, educational materials, and programs on the role of the courts in responding to cases involving these issues. VAWEP is a project of the Center for Families, Children & the Courts (CFCC) of the Judicial and Court Operations Service Division, for the Judicial Council of California. The project is being implemented in collaboration with the Office of Education/Center for Judiciary Education and Research (CJER) and is funded by the California Governor s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) with resources from the federal Office on Violence Against Women (OVW). The project s planning committee is composed of a tribal court judge, state judicial officers, prosecutors, defense attorneys, attorneys with expertise in the field of domestic violence, victim advocates, and other experts, guides the project staff in identifying key areas of focus and developing appropriate educational programming. Project Goals The goals of VAWEP are to: Identify primary educational and informational needs of the courts on domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, and teen dating violence issues; Initiate new judicial branch educational programming pertaining to domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, teen dating violence, human trafficking, and elder abuse issues, including the delivery of regional training events and the enhancement of existing programming; Develop distance learning opportunities for judicial officers and court staff relating to court procedure and policy in the areas of domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, and teen dating violence; Develop and compile useful information for the courts on domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, and teen dating violence issues that

Page 2 of 15 relates specifically to California state and tribal law and federal Indian Law; Institutionalize inclusion of domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, and teen dating violence issues in all relevant judicial branch education curricula, programs, and publications; Create incentives to increase attendance and participation in judicial branch education relating to domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, and teen dating violence; Increase communication among state and tribal courts about best practices in domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, and teen dating violence cases; Provide jurisdiction-specific technical assistance on domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, and teen dating violence issues of greatest importance to local courts; Create educational tools that aid in the administration of justice for self-represented litigants in domestic violence cases; Purchase computer or audio visual equipment for court-specific domestic violence-related projects; and Support efforts to enhance access to and improve the administration of justice for Native American victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, and teen dating violence. Judicial Education on Domestic Violence Effective January 1, 2010, the Judicial Council adopted rule 10.464 of the California Rules of Courts to provide for education on domestic violence for state court judges, commissioners, and referees. The rule: Requires participation in appropriate education on domestic violence issues by each judicial officer who hears matters in criminal, family, juvenile delinquency, juvenile dependency, or probate court, and in addition, for those with primary assignments in these areas, participation in periodic updates; and Requires inclusion of domestic violence issues in courses at the Judicial College and in primary assignment courses for both new and experienced judicial officers.

Page 3 of 15 The VAWEP project provides live statewide programs, local programs, and distancelearning opportunities so that judges, commissioners, and referees have diverse ways to fulfill the requirement of the rule. The Judicial Council s advisory committee, the Tribal Court-State Court Forum (forum), makes recommendations to the project s planning committee about content on federal Indian law and its impact on state courts. To promote the collaboration between the project s planning committee and the forum, a tribal judge, who is a forum member, serves as liaison between the two groups. Educational Events and Technical Assistance Primary Assignment Orientation Courses, Criminal Assignment Courses, and other Related Events VAWEP develops, staffs, and sponsors a series of in-depth courses on domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, teen dating violence, and elder abuse issues that are integrated into these showcase programs of CJER. Primary Assignment Orientation Courses The Judicial Council offers week-long programs in family law, juvenile law, criminal law, and probate designed for judicial officers new to the relevant assignment. The Primary Assignment Orientation courses are designed to satisfy the content-based requirements of rule 10.462(c)(1)(B) of the California Rules of Court applicable to new judges and subordinate judicial officers. The courses also satisfy the expectations and requirements of rule 10.462(c)(4) applicable to experienced judges and subordinate judicial officers new to, or returning to, an assignment. The VAWEP project has developed components on domestic violence issues for each of these programs. Generally the Family Law Primary Assignment Orientation includes components on the effects of domestic violence on children and an overview of domestic violence law. The Criminal Law Primary Assignment Orientation includes a segment on criminal procedure in domestic violence cases. The Juvenile Law Primary Assignment Orientation includes a course on the effects of domestic violence on children in dependency and delinquency proceedings. The Probate Law Primary Assignment Orientation offers a segment on civil protective orders for elderly adults. The following orientation courses are offered during the grant cycle: January 2015 Criminal Law Primary Assignment Orientation Family Law Primary Assignment Orientation

Page 4 of 15 Probate Law Primary Assignment Orientation Juvenile Law Primary Assignment Orientation (Dependency) San Francisco February 2015 Family Law Primary Assignment Orientation Juvenile Law Orientation (Delinquency) Sacramento June 2015 Criminal Law Primary Assignment Orientation Family Law Primary Assignment Orientation Long Beach September 2015 Criminal Law Primary Assignment Orientation Sacramento Continuing Judicial Education: Experience Assignment Courses CJER develops and implements programming designed to satisfy the content-based expectations of California Rules of Court, rule 10.462(c)(4) for experienced judges returning to a criminal assignment and to others seeking hours-based continuing education under rule 10.452(d). The following courses were offered during the grant cycle: November 2014 Human Trafficking Forum San Francisco The project convened judicial officers and stakeholders to meet and discuss ways of improving services to commercially sexual exploited children (CSEC). County teams consisting of judicial officers, law enforcement, probation and service providers met for a day-long program to introduce their respective CSEC programs and brainstorm ideas for corrective measures. March 2015 Handling Sexual Assault Cases San Francisco Sexual assault cases require the judge to be familiar with a unique body of substantive and procedural law that is not necessarily applicable in other criminal cases. The judge must also be aware and understand the dynamics of sexual assault cases, the needs of the victim and specially mandated accommodations, and myths and misconceptions about sexual assault victims and offenders. This two-day course emphasized these key issues and guided the judge through managing a sexual

Page 5 of 15 assault trial from arraignment to sentencing and postsentencing procedures. June 2015 Abuse in Later Life San Francisco This 2.5 day course emphasized the key issues and guided judge through managing the complexities of elder abuse cases. The course helps judges become familiar with elder abuse in its various court settings and the relevant underlying law and procedure, provided an awareness and understanding of the dynamics of elder abuse cases, the needs of the victim and appropriate accommodations, and myths and misconceptions about elder abuse victims and offenders. Judicial Institutes (October and November, 2014 and March and June 2015) VAWEP courses are included as part of the Probate and Mental Health Institute in October 2014, the Juvenile Law Institute in November 2014, the Family Law Institute in March 2015, and the Cow County Judges Institute in -June 2015. These institute trainings and educational events provide information specific to target audiences. Probate and Mental Health Institute (October 2014) The Probate and Mental Health Institute serves as the primary venue for judicial education on probate matters, including decedents estates, probate conservatorships and guardianships, trusts, elder abuse, and mental health proceedings. A description of the workshop follows: Elder Abuse. This course was designed to enhance judicial officers skills and abilities to respond to issues involving physical, emotional, and financial abuse of elders. The primary focus was probate and conservatorship issues in elder abuse cases. The course covered forms of abuse of older adults, the characteristics of victims and perpetrators, family dynamics, undue influence, selected restraining order issues, and accommodating the needs of elders in court. Juvenile Law Institute (November 2014) The Juvenile Law Institute is designed to meet the needs of judges and subordinate judicial officers new to a juvenile law assignment and also those with greater experience. Domestic Violence & Dependency Critical Decisions. This course analyzed the critical decisions judicial officers must make when domestic violence is

Page 6 of 15 alleged in juvenile dependency cases. These decisions have a lasting impact on the child and family and include whether reasonable efforts were made to prevent removal, whether the allegations are sufficient to establish a substantial risk of harm to the child, whether the evidence supports removal of the child from the home, whether reasonable services were provided to reunify the family, and whether it is safe to return the child home. Family Law Institute (March 2015) The Family Law Institute is held in conjunction with the Family Law Education Program (FLEP) to provide an opportunity for judicial officers and family court services mediators and evaluators to jointly attend courses. The workshops presented this year include: Cultural Considerations in Custody Disputes Involving Domestic Violence This workshop focused on providing a baseline definition of culture and cultural competency. Faculty will guided and facilitated group discussions about the effects of cultural misinformation and challenging cultural practices on resolving custody disputes when domestic violence is alleged. What You Need to Know About the Hague Convention and Domestic Violence Cases. California family courts are sometimes faced with cases involving the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in matters that involve allegations of domestic violence. This workshop focused on addressing cases in which a petition is filed in the United States for the return of a child taken to or retained in the United States (referred to as incoming cases ), in which the respondent (the taking or abducting parent) alleges abuse by the petition (the left-behind parent). Faculty will focus on the intersection of domestic violence and the Convention, discussing the dynamics of domestic violence and the applicability of domestic violence to the court s analysis in a petition for return of a child pursuant to the Hague Convention. Making Parenting Plans Recommendations and Issues Orders in Cases Involving Domestic Violence. This workshop provided practical tips for mediators, child custody recommending counselors, and judges on how to approach providing services and orders in contested child custody cases with allegations of domestic violence Domestic Violence and Child Custody (Welcome Plenary) Jeffrey Edleson from the School of Social Welfare at the University of California at Berkeley provided a presentation on the impact of domestic violence on children and the implications for family court judges, child custody mediators, recommending counselors, and evaluators. The workshop also guided participants on how to apply current understanding of the effects of domestic violence on children

Page 7 of 15 to mediation and child custody recommending counseling work and child custody decision-making; integrate research on domestic violence and children into child custody work; and explain the significant of domestic violence to litigants and to the courts. Cow County Judges Institute (June 2015) The Cow County Judges Institute provides an opportunity to present courses to rural judges in an environment that allows for discussion of substantive and procedural law and their unique features in a rural setting. A series of workshops for this audience was presented at the institute. The Effects of Domestic Violence on Children and Crafting Parenting Plans and Orders in Cases Involving Domestic Violence. The pre-institute offering focused on the current research on the effects of domestic violence on children and the relevance of that information for judges hearing criminal, juvenile, probate, and family law cases. Sarah Buel, Clinical Professor of Law at Arizona State University s Sandra Day O Connor of Law, provided the research and legal context based on her over 30 years of experience in the field. Following the presentation by Dr. Buel, the panel offered additional legal information and practical guidance for courts providing confidential mediation or child custody recommending counseling. Restraining Order Basics. This course reviewed the basic requirements for the different types of restraining orders, pointed out places where the Court has an affirmative duty and discussed the nuances of criminal restraining orders. Family Law and Domestic Violence (Roundtable). This topic was one of three roundtable discussions allowing judicial officers to share experiences, promising practices and potential problems with changes in legislation. Ethics and Self-Represented Litigants in Domestic Violence Cases (January 2015) This 1.5-day course focused on general judicial ethics issues that arise in domestic violence cases such as disqualification, disclosure, ex parte communication, and community outreach, as well as application of the canons of ethics in the context of the increasing numbers of self-represented litigants that judicial officers are seeing in domestic violence cases. The course provided an opportunity to demonstrate and practice demeanor and communications skills during a videotaping and feedback session. A workshop on the nuts and bolts of California restraining order law preceded the course.

Page 8 of 15 Domestic Violence: What Everyone New to the Bench Should Know, Judicial College (August 2015) A course on issues of domestic violence is part of the nationally recognized B. E. Witkin Judicial College of California, a program providing comprehensive education for all new superior court judges, commissioners, and referees. The course provided background information on domestic violence and is mandatory for all program participants as required by Government Code section 68555. A description of the course follows: Domestic Violence: What Everyone New to the Bench Should Know. By the time any judge completes five years on the bench, he or she will have presided over several cases involving domestic violence issues. Many judges will have handled dozens of these cases; some daily, some weekly, some yearly. This course explored the complexities confronting judicial officers handling domestic violence cases and promotes an understanding of victim and perpetrator dynamics, recanting witnesses, effects of domestic violence on children, and ways to assess risks of dangerousness and lethality. Judges acquired knowledge of the varying legal standards and technical requirements in different case types, including criminal law, family law, juvenile law and occasionally other proceedings. Faculty presented information and conducted interactive discussions to better prepare the judicial officer new to the bench for these difficult and important cases. Domestic Violence Safety Partnership Program (Ongoing in 2013-2014) Under the auspices of the Domestic Violence Safety Partnership (DVSP) project, VAWEP provided targeted, local technical assistance to applicant courts that have identifiedhave identified a need for training. DVSP distributes a self-assessment tool that enumerates required procedures and recommended practices and provides training and technical assistance based on the issues identified. In the past, VAWEP has received many requests from courts about specific information needs, which can range from understanding warning signs for lethality in domestic violence cases to improving communication between the many types of courts that may be involved in a particular case. To date, DVSP has provided to trial courts more than 93 instances of technical assistance or local educational support. The project provides experts whose specialties vary based on the need of the specific court. This assistance is accomplished by delivering a substantive expert to speak to the issues at hand, providing speakers at trainings with expertise in issues related to violence against women, or facilitating a peer-mentoring meeting in which courts come together to learn about individual best practices. Recipients of this assistance

Page 9 of 15 are asked to evaluate what they have received. Assistance can also include purchasing audio visual and technological equipment that courts may use to enhance the administration of justice in domestic violence and related cases. Collaboration with the Judicial Council s Office of Education on Local Training and Distance Learning The project continues to join with the Judicial Council s Office of Education/Center for Judiciary Education and Research (CJER) to offer local judicial education on domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, teen dating violence, human trafficking, and elder abuse. In 2010 CJER launched an initiative to enhance the ability of local courts to provide high-quality judicial education for bench officers. Courts can locally host judicial education classes simply by selecting the course from the course catalog. The courses range in duration from 1.5 to 3 hours. Local education minimizes time away from the bench and eliminates most travel expenses. The catalog currently contains twenty-one domestic violence related courses, including the following titles: Handling Elder Abuse Issues Restraining Orders in Elder Abuse Cases Adjudication of Stalking Cases Stalking in Cyberspace: What a Judge Needs to Know Batterer Intervention Programs: What We Know and What We Need to Know Beyond the Basics: An Overview of Domestic Violence Cases and Protective Orders Domestic Violence and Ethics Domestic Violence and Fairness Issues Domestic Violence and Tribal Communities Cross-Jurisdictional Issues Evaluating the Effects of Domestic Violence on Children Immigration Issues in Criminal Domestic Violence Cases Restraining Orders in Multiple Court Settings Assessing Dangerousness in Criminal Domestic Violence Cases Domestic Violence and Custody Assessing the Risk Domestic Violence Issues in Family Law Cases Domestic Violence Issues in Juvenile Cases Ethics and Self-Represented Litigants in Domestic Violence Cases

Page 10 of 15 Handling Sexual Assault Cases Reasonable Efforts in Dependency Cases Involving Domestic Violence Science of Aging Stalking Cases and Court Security Curriculum Development and Publications VAWEP distributes the following curricula, publications, and other resource materials: Review and update Existing Bench Guides, Publications and Other Resources (Ongoing in 2014-2015) The project reviewed the various benchguides and determined that updates were not required during the grant period. New Judges Guide on Handling Elder Abuse Cases (Ongoing in 2014-2015) The project will add the five new modules to the existing stand-alone bench guide for judges on elder abuse cases, based on an outline completed during the 2012-2013 grant year. The five modules include an overview and introduction to abuse in later life, definitions and forms of elder abuse, settings in which abuse occurs, risk factors and indicators of elder abuse, the impact of elder abuse and will help judicial officers make effective and appropriate orders and decisions in these cases. The bench guide proves especially helpful because the law in this area is particularly complex and judicial officers have noted a need for more information in this area. Annual Report and Fact Sheet Project staff develops an updated annual report and this fact sheet to highlight key efforts the project has undertaken as well as judicial and court responses to those efforts. These documents are distributed to provide project information to judicial branch professionals and the public. As educational tools, they focus on suggested practices and innovative approaches. Tribal/State Activities In response to the recommendations to the Judicial Council to share educational resources between the state judicial branch and the tribal justice systems and to incorporate content on federal Indian law and its impact on state courts into judicial education institutes, multi-disciplinary symposia, distance learning, and other educational materials, the Judicial Council implements the following tribal/state

Page 11 of 15 projects relating to domestic violence sexual assault, stalking and teen dating violence: Educational Programs Modeled after the Domestic Violence Safety Partnership, the S.T.E.P.S. (State/Tribal Education, Partnerships, and Services) to Justice Domestic Violence provides local educational and technical assistance to tribal courts and state courts on issues relating to domestic violence and tribal communities. At the request of judges, this project can tailor an educational event to meet local educational needs or provide technical assistance in response to locally identified and targeted needs. Examples of local educational assistance that offered include identifying faculty and facilitators, paying faculty or facilitator expenses, developing educational materials and curriculum for court-sponsored events, planning or otherwise assisting with other cross-court educational opportunities, such as judge-to-judge or court-to-court informational exchanges, cross-site visits, or cross-court educational exchanges. Examples of local technical assistance include sharing state judicial branch resources, such as statewide forms, the statewide domestic violence order database (California Courts Protective Order Registry), the extensive judicial resources on the Court Extranet and CJER Online, access to all state judicial branch educational opportunities, consultation on court operations, and access to information about grant opportunities as well as partnerships expressed in letters of support for tribal court grant applications. State and Tribal Court Toolkit (Ongoing) The project developed a toolkit to both encourage and assist court administrators (tribal, state and federal) to learn about each other s justice systems through visits and the sharing of knowledge, expertise, and resources on a number of topics, including court operations relating to cases involving domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking teen dating violence, and human trafficking. Develop Bench Card/Educational Tools (Ongoing) The project developed a judicial resource in the form of a judicial script, fact sheet, bench card or similar tool for new judicial officers in domestic violence assignment who have tribal lands/and or tribal courts within their jurisdiction. The tool will alert the court to issues to be aware of concerning federal Indian law. Resource Fairs at Statewide or National Event (Ongoing) In response to the Native American Communities Justice Project s research report at page 13 describing how access to the courts is effectively blocked by a lack of

Page 12 of 15 understanding about what courts can and should do to address family violence, the project will continue to share information at statewide and national events. Local Tribal-State Agreements to Improve Recognition of Tribal Protective Orders (Ongoing) The project promoted innovative procedures developed by tribal and state courts that improve recognition and enforcement of tribal protective orders. The project showcased these innovative procedures on the Judicial Council Innovation Knowledge Center, an online resource center featuring numerous initiatives which have been implemented statewide. Educational Workshop on Domestic Violence at Forum Meeting (June2015) The project developed a workshop to explore challenges to establishing and sustaining local tribal/county law enforcement partnerships. During the workshop, participants identified strategies to establish and sustain law enforcement collaborations and suggested educational recommendations. Jurisdictional Tools for Law Enforcement and Judges (Ongoing in 2015) Existing state and tribal laws are insufficient to guide the handling of all interactions between state and tribal authorities and their agents. For example, law on service of process leaves gaps and unanswered questions in a way that balances the tribe s sovereignty with the state s responsibility and interest in enforcing criminal law. There are other situations where state and tribal authorities complement one another, by providing stand by and back up at calls for services, or when one detains a suspect for the other. Likewise, state and tribal courts may more effectively handle matters when they work collaboratively, whether on issues of enforcement of domestic violence restraining/protection orders or holding an offender accountable. The project brought together law enforcement and judges to develop jurisdictional tools for these audiences. Further Information For additional information about VAWEP activities, please contact: Center for Families, Children & the Courts Administrative Office of the Courts 455 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102-3688 Phone: 415-865-7739

Page 13 of 15 Project Staff Ms. Bonnie Rose Hough, Project Manager Managing Attorney Phone: 415-865-7668 E-mail: bonnie.hough@jud.ca.gov Ms. Jennifer Walter Supervising Attorney Phone: 415-865-7687 E-mail: jennifer.walter@jud.ca.gov Ms. Penelope Davis E-mail: penny.davis@jud.ca.gov Phone: 415-865-8815 Senior Court Services Analyst

Planning Committee Roster Hon. Mary Ann Grilli, Chair California, County of Santa Clara Ms. Emberly Cross Coordinating Attorney Cooperative Restraining Order Clinic San Francisco Hon. Lewis A. Davis California, County of Contra Costa Hon. Becky Lynn Dugan California, County of Riverside Hon. Harry Mark Elias California, County of San Diego Hon. Sherrill A. Ellsworth (Ret.) California, County of Riverside Hon. Scott M. Gordon Supervising Family Law Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles Hon. Arlan L. Harrell California, County of Fresno Ms. Sandra Henriquez Executive Director California Coalition Against Sexual Assault (CALCASA) Hon. Joni T. Hiramoto California, County of Contra Costa Hon. Sam Lavorato, Jr. California, County of Monterey Mr. Rick Layon Layon and Holck San Diego Ms. Kathy Moore Executive Director California Partnership to End Domestic Violence Ms. Nancy O Malley District Attorney Alameda County Ms. Lynda Smallenberger Executive Director Kene Me-Wu Family Healing Center, Inc. Sonora Dep. Roena Spiller Sheriff s Office San Mateo County

Page 15 of 15 Mr. Mark Varela Chief Probation Officer Ventura County Probation Agency Hon. Glenda Veasey Commissioner of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles Mr. Martin Vranicar, Jr. Assistant Chief Executive Officer California District Attorneys Association Hon. Christine Williams Chief Judge of the Northern California Intertribal Court System (NCIS) Chief Judge of the Shingle Springs Tribal Court Ms. Ellen Yin-Wycoff Associate Director California Coalition Against Sexual Assault (CALCASA)