THE ROOFPOINT ENERGY AND CARBON CALCULATOR A NEW MODELING TOOL FOR ROOFING PROFESSIONALS

Similar documents
RoofPoint Energy and Carbon Calculator

How To Design A Sustainable Roofing

Roofing Retrofits: Focus on Sustainability

August 16, Rebecca Duff ICF Interna tional 9300 Lee Highway Fairfax, VA Re: ENERGY STAR Version 2.0 Final Draft. Dear Ms.

Saving Energy and Money On Your Commercial Roof

Economic Evaluation of Residential Air Conditioner Designs for Hot and Dry Climates

Proposal prepared for Happy Solar Owner

The Expanding Role of the Roof in a Sustainable World. Dr. James L. Hoff Research Director Center for Environmental Innovation in Roofing

FINAL REPORT LIFE-CYCLE COST STUDY OF A GEOTHERMAL HEAT PUMP SYSTEM BIA OFFICE BLDG., WINNEBAGO, NE

EnergyPro Building Energy Analysis. Assisted Living Building

Yield Reduction due to Shading:

3.36 kw Solar PV Kit Pricing

Mailing Address 4650 Adohr Ln. Camarillo, CA Year Financial Analysis. $1,051 / mo (avg) Cost Breakdown. System Description

Q Utility Rebate Report. Houston, TX

AT&T Global Network Client for Windows Product Support Matrix January 29, 2015

150 Watts. Solar Panel. one square meter. Watts

Proof of Concept - Solar Energy DG Distribution Warehouse

Comprehensive Course Schedule

Q Utility Rebate Report. Fort Worth, TX

REDUCING PEAK ENERGY DEMAND: A HIDDEN BENEFIT OF COOL ROOFS. Dr. James L. Hoff, DBA. TEGNOS Research, Inc., Keith Gere and Robert Carnick

Brighter Future: A Study on Solar in K-12 Schools. Wednesday February 4 th 2015

The Center for Environmental

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

RAMP Energy Efficiency

Solar Energy for the Homeowner. Glen Salas

Get Rid of Roof Problems for Good. How spray foam roofing can protect your building and make you money

Design issues For Net Zero Energy Buildings. Laura Aelenei 26 de Junho de 2012

By James L. Hoff. Cool Roofing Symposium Hyatt Regency Hotel Atlanta, Georgia May, 2005

Outline. Solar Energy II. Solar Power II March 10, ME 496ALT Alternative Energy 1. Alternative Energy

ADB s Rooftop Solar Project. Aiming Zhou Senior Energy Specialist June th Asia Clean Energy Forum

Gross/Active PV Surface Area: ,40 / ,29 m². Energy Produced by PV Array (AC):

Energy Use in Residential Housing: A Comparison of Insulating Concrete Form and Wood Frame Walls

Cox Conserves is a very important part of the culture. It is what you do rather than what you say.

Jon Buschke 3059 Austin Ave Simi Valley, CA (805)

Introduction to Energy Codes & Green Building Programs

Energy Efficiency: Integrated Design and HVAC Systems HEALTHCARE - TOP 5 GREEN BUILDING STRATEGIES

By: Crystal Warren IMPLEMENTATION OF SOLAR PANELS ON COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES AND THE COST-BASED INCENTIVES

2015 RACE TO ZERO STUDENT DESIGN COMPETITION

Enhanced Vessel Traffic Management System Booking Slots Available and Vessels Booked per Day From 12-JAN-2016 To 30-JUN-2017

Enough Solar Energy falls on New York in ONE DAY to power the state for ONE YEAR

Energy Efficiency Analysis for a Multi-Story Commercial Office Building. (LG Multi V Water II Heat Recovery VRF System)

Rules of Thumb Energy Efficiency in Buildings

Comprehensive Course Schedule

2016 Instructor Training & Certification Schedule

2009 Seattle Energy Code Impacts: See below for a recap of Changes in Envelope performance from 2006 to 2009

Energy Savings in High-Rise Buildings Using High-Reflective Coatings

Massachusetts PV and SHW Program Update Elizabeth Kennedy Program Director Massachusetts Clean Energy Center

Best Practices in Roof Design: Sustainable Energy Efficient Reroofing

Sea Water Heat Pump Project

ACTIVITY BASED MODELING for DATA CENTER ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROJECTS. Paul Blevins Onsite Energy Corporation February 3, 2011

Analysis One Code Desc. Transaction Amount. Fiscal Period

Codes and High Performance Hot Water Systems. Gary Klein Affiliated International Management, LLC

Case 2:08-cv ABC-E Document 1-4 Filed 04/15/2008 Page 1 of 138. Exhibit 8

Driving Action through. Title Style. Moderated by: Sarah Zaleski U.S. DOE

Energy Efficiency Analysis for a Multi-Story Commercial Office Building. (LG Multi V III Heat Recovery VRF System)

Sino-Italian Environment & Energy Building S I E E B

TEACHING SUSTAINABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS A CASE STUDY

Energy Efficiency in Buildings

FREE ONLINE APPLICATION OF CALCULATION

Design of Grid Connect PV systems. Palau Workshop 8 th -12 th April

Professional Report. Map section. Location of the system. Valkkinen Longitude: Latitude: Elevation: 89 m

The Effect of High SRI Roofing Finishes Across Climate Zones in the U.S. John Lee

Electric Market National Overview

Subtropical Cities September Design for Energy Efficiency in Commercial Buildings in Queensland

Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport District Energy Plant Upgrades Project Making More with Less Sustainable Communities Conference Dallas, TX

This presentation is posted for public use. ACEEE does not endorse any product or service.

Geothermal Heat Pump Systems: From Basics to Hybrids

Supplemental Health Insurance Products Inventory Report. May 2014

Selecting Energy Efficient Replacement Windows in Nevada

Residential Energy Consumption: Longer Term Response to Climate Change

U.S. Concentrating Solar Power

Benefits of Water-Cooled Systems vs. Air-Cooled Systems for Air-Conditioning Applications

MECHANICAL PROJECT PROPOSAL

Exploring the Building Energy Impacts of Green Roof Design Decisions - A Modeling Study of Buildings in 4 Distinct Climates

Selecting Energy Efficient New Windows in Georgia

Running the Electric Meter Backwards: Real-Life Experience with a Residential Solar Power System

Selecting Energy Efficient New Windows in Arizona

Protocol for the Certification of Energy Simulation Software: First edition, December 2009

Selecting Energy Efficient New Windows in Texas

Commercial Energy Savings Guide.

State Annual Report Due Dates for Business Entities page 1 of 10

William Haman, P.E. IAMU Energy 2013 Conference, Ankeny, IA October 1, 2013

THE VALUE OF SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING: PITT OHIO'S EXPERIENCE. Geoffrey Muessig CMO / Vice President of Sales PITT OHIO

Raising the Bar: A Comparison Study of Iowa s Current and Proposed Energy Code

ENERGY AUDITS (OR SURVEYS) & ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS SECTION B

Presenter: Bruce Clay Clay Energy Fiji

Tysons Sustainability Summit Evidence Based Urban Design. Roger E. Frechette III, PE, LEED-AP

Does It Matter Which Weather Data You Use in Energy Simulations? 1

Level 1 Energy Audit Report. For: Gladstone Regional Council

Energy Savings from Business Energy Feedback

LEED PRESENTATION OUTLINE

Learn How to Build a Multi Family Apartment Buildings in Madison Wisconsin

Improving comfort and energy efficiency in a nursery school design process S. Ferrari, G. Masera, D. Dell Oro

USING DOE 2.1E TO EVALUATE GREEN BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OPPORTUNITIES AND VENTILATION DESIGN FOR LOTUS SCHOOL

Translating the need for energy, water and food dynamics in security analysis as well as in operational and tactical implementation

Implementing Carbon Reduction Without Impacting Working Capital. Presented by Dylan Crompton

Selecting Energy Efficient New Windows in California

A NEW DESICCANT EVAPORATIVE COOLING CYCLE FOR SOLAR AIR CONDITIONING AND HOT WATER HEATING

Moisture Content in Insulated Basement Walls

Transcription:

THE ROOFPOINT ENERGY AND CARBON CALCULATOR A NEW MODELING TOOL FOR ROOFING PROFESSIONALS James L. Hoff, VP of Research Center for Environmental Innovation in Roofing

Tools and Models Tools require models to be effective Models need tools to be useful

Tools Require Models Tool: DOE Cool Roof Calculator PV Watts Calculator NRCA Energy Wise Calculator Model: ORNL Radiation Control Model NREL PV Array Simulation Model ASHRAE 90.1

Models Need Tools Example: Sustainable Building Models LEED Living Building Challenge Green Globes How much do they improve the environment? What amount of savings are achieved? What do different achievement levels mean?

Today s Model: ROOFPOINT CM ROOFPOINT Guideline for Environmentally Innovative Commercial Roofing Sustainable guideline and rating system for roofing Comprehensive approach to roofs, energy, & environment Developed by Center for Environmental Innovation in Roofing Simple and cost effective online evaluation system Over 500 roofing projects submitted to date

ROOFPOINT CM ROOFPOINT Guideline for Environmentally Innovative Commercial Roofing Credits cover all key sustainability issues: Energy, Water, Materials, Life Cycle Scoring system is flexible, balanced, and credible Provides a clear contrast to the increasing complexity of LEED and other programs Emphasis on durability addresses emerging issue of resilience in construction

ROOFPOINT and Modeling Tools The Model: Possible Modeling Tools: Energy Calculator ROOFPOINT Carbon Calculator Water Use Calculator Solid Waste Calculator Life Cycle Calculator

Building a Useful Modeling Tool Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Determine Outcomes Identify Strategies Establish Measures Identify Variables and Assumptions Assemble the Model Test the Model Look to the Future

Step 1: Determine Outcomes RoofPoint Outcomes (Intents) ENERGY Net Energy Consumption Peak Energy Consumption Clean Energy Production LIFE CYCLE Service Life Resilience ENVIRONMENT Solid Waste / Recycling Storm Water / Water Use Heat Island / Global Warming HEALTH / SAFETY Accident Prevention Indoor Air Quality

Step 2: Identify Strategies RoofPoint Energy Strategies (Credits) CREDIT TITLE OUTCOME / INTENT STRATEGY E1 HIGH R ROOF SYSTEMS Reduce Net Energy Increase Roof R Value E2 BEST THERMAL PRACTICES Reduce Net Energy E3 ROOF SURFACE THERMAL CONTRIBUTION Reduce Net / Peak Energy & Heat Island Effects Reduce Thermal Discontinuities Install Climate- Appropriate Roof Surface E4 ROOF AIR BARRIER Reduce Net Energy Install Air Barrier E5 ROOFTOP ENERGY SYSTEMS Produce Clean Energy Install Rooftop Solar E6 ROOFTOP DAYLIGHTING Produce Clean Energy Install Roof Daylighting

Step 3: Establish Measures RoofPoint Energy Measures CREDIT TITLE BASE MEASURE CONVERTS TO E1 HIGH R ROOF SYSTEMS R / Ft 2 BTU / Ft 2 E2 BEST THERMAL PRACTICES % Improvement BTU / Ft 2 E3 ROOF SURFACE THERMAL CONTRIBUTION SRI / Equivalent SRI BTU / Ft 2 E4 ROOF AIR BARRIER % Improvement BTU / Ft 2 E5 ROOFTOP ENERGY SYSTEMS W / Ft 2 or BTU / Ft 2 BTU / Ft 2 E6 ROOFTOP DAYLIGHTING Net Lumens / Ft 2 BTU / Ft 2

Step 4: Identify Variables & Assumptions Model Cities / Climate Zones CITY ASHRAE CLIMATE ZONE MIAMI, FL HOUSTON, TX PHOENIX, AZ ATLANTA, GA LOS ANGELES, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA BALTIMORE, MD SEATTLE, WA PITTSBURGH, PA RENO, NV MILWAUKEE, WI 1A MOIST 2A MOIST 2B DRY 3A MOIST 3B DRY 3C MARINE 4A MOIST 4C MARINE 5A MOIST 5B DRY 6A MOIST WINNIPEG, MB 7

Step 4: Identify Variables & Assumptions Roof System R-Values R-VALUE BASIS R-10 OLD CODE R-15 OLD CODE R-20 2012 IECC ZONE 1-3 R-25 2012 IECC ZONE 4-5 R-30 2012 IECC ZONE 6 R-32 2012 IECC ZONE 7* * Zone 7 is actually R-35, but R-32 is highest value available in the DOE Cool Roof Calculator

Step 4: Identify Variables & Assumptions Roof Surface Type ROOF SURFACE SOLAR REFLECTIVITY THERMAL EMMISSIVITY LOW REFLECTIVE AGED SR 0.10 TE = 0.90 MEDIUM REFLECTIVE AGED SR 0.30 TE = 0.90 HIGH REFLECTIVE AGED SR 0.60 TE = 0.90 BALLASTED 1 VEGETATIVE 2 EXTRA HIGH REFLECTIVE ASSUMED EQUIV. AGED SR 0.60 ASSUMED EQUIV. AGED SR 0.60 AGED SR 70 TE = 0.90 TE = 0.90 TE = 0.90 1. Min. 22 lbs. / ft 2 Zones 1-4, Min. 15 lbs. / ft 2 Zones 5-7 2. Intensive or extensive vegetative roof meeting requirements of RoofPoint Credit W1.

Step 4: Identify Variables & Assumptions Conditioned Space CONDITION ENERGY SOURCE EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE HEATING NATURAL GAS EFFICIENCY = 0.70 COOLING ELECTRICITY COP = 2.0

Step 4: Identify Variables & Assumptions Peak v. Net Energy 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Phoenix Minneapolis 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Phoenix Minneapolis Ratio of Monthly to Annual Peak Cooling Demand Derived from Petrie, Wilkes and Dejarlais (2004)

Step 4: Identify Variables & Assumptions Peak v. Net Energy CITY ASHRAE CLIMATE ZONE PEAK / NET DEMAND RATIO MIAMI, FL 1A MOIST 0.30 HOUSTON, TX 2A MOIST 0.36 PHOENIX, AZ 2B DRY 0.28 ATLANTA, GA 3A MOIST 0.44 LOS ANGELES, CA 3B DRY 0.64 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 3C MARINE 1.10 BALTIMORE, MD 4A MOIST 0.55 SEATTLE, WA 4C MARINE 1.10 PITTSBURGH, PA 5A MOIST 0.73 RENO, NV 5B DRY 0.83 MILWAUKEE, WI 6A MOIST 0.92 WINNIPEG, MB 7 1.10

Step 4: Identify Variables & Assumptions Best Thermal Practices CONDITION VALUE NO THERMAL BREAKS STAGGERED INSULATION, MECH. ATTACHED STAGGERED INSULATION: LOOSELEY LAID STAGGERED INSULATION: TOP LAYER(S) ADHERED MONOLITHIC INSULATION (e.g. SPF) Roof Air Barrier CONDITION NO AIR BARRIER AIR BARRIER BENEATH ROOF MEMBRANE ROOF MEMBRANE SERVES AS AIR BARRIER 15% PENALTY 10% PENALTY 5% PENALTY 5% PENALTY NO PENALTY VALUE 10% PENALTY NO PENALTY NO PENALTY

Step 4: Identify Variables & Assumptions Rooftop PV CITY Annual kw AC / kw STC 1,2 MIAMI, FL 1339 HOUSTON, TX 1220 PHOENIX, AZ 1617 ATLANTA, GA 1345 LOS ANGELES, CA 1470 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 1446 BALTIMORE, MD 1228 SEATTLE, WA 970 PITTSBURGH, PA 1099 RENO, NV 1534 MILWAUKEE, WI 1231 1. Calculated using NREL PVWatts Version 1 2. Annual kwh converted to BTU (1kW = 3412 BTU) WINNIPEG, MB 1291

Step 4: Identify Variables & Assumptions Rooftop Solar Thermal Rooftop solar thermal assumes annual hot water production of 100,000 BTU per square foot of collector area Rooftop Daylighting Assumes 32 kwh per foot-candle of average daytime illumination Annual kwh reduced 25% to compensate for any heat gain or loss from skylights Annual kwh converted to BTU (1kW = 3412 BTU)

Step 4: Identify Variables & Assumptions Carbon Offsets Assumes 1 kg (or 0.001 Metric Ton) CO 2 emitted into the atmosphere for every 18,000 BTU of annual energy usage. Based on current U.S. averages for building source energy, including a mix of natural gas for heating and electricity for cooling generated by a combination of renewable and non-renewable sources. Other Notes US DOE Cool Roof Peak Calculator used to calculate base values for energy use related to roof system R-value and roof surface reflectivity All resultant values and calculations entered into a series of Excel worksheets, one worksheet for each model city. Worksheets provide for a comparison calculation of a Base Case Roof and a RoofPoint Roof

Step 5: Assemble the Model Inputs: Base Case Roof BASE CASE ROOF ROOF SURFACE AREA Enter surface area of Base Case Roof (Sq. Ft.) 100,000 CREDIT E1: HIGH R ROOF Select R-Value for the Base Case Roof: Note: See RoofPoint Credit E1 for more information. CREDIT E2: BEST THERMAL PRACTICE Note: See RoofPoint Credit E2 for more information. CREDIT E4: ROOF AIR BARRIER Note: See RoofPoint Credit E4 for more information. CREDIT E3: ROOF SURFACE THERMAL CONTRIBUTION Note: See RoofPoint Credit E3 for more information. CREDIT E5: ROOFTOP PV Note: See RoofPoint Credit E5 for more information. CREDIT E5: ROOFTOP SOLAR THERMAL Note: See RoofPoint Credit E5 for more information. R10 Select type of thermal break for the Base Case Roof: No thermal breaks (15% penalty) Select type of air barrier for the Base Case Roof: No air barrier installed (10% penalty) Select type of roof surface for the Base Case Roof: Medium Reflective: Aged SR 30 Does the Base Case Roof include a PV system? No If yes, enter the system STC Rating (kw) 0 Does the Base Case Roof include a solar thermal system? No If yes, enter the system total collector area (FT 2 ) CREDIT E6: ROOF DAYLIGHTING Note: See RoofPoint Credit E6 for more information. Does the Base Case Roof include daylighting? No If yes, enter average illumination at floor level (FC)

Step 5: Assemble the Model Inputs: RoofPoint Roof ROOF SURFACE AREA CREDIT E1: HIGH R ROOF Note: See RoofPoint Credit E1 for more information. CREDIT E2: BEST THERMAL PRACTICE Note: See RoofPoint Credit E2 for more information. CREDIT E4: ROOF AIR BARRIER Note: See RoofPoint Credit E4 for more information. CREDIT E3: ROOF SURFACE THERMAL CONTRIBUTION Note: See RoofPoint Credit E3 for more information. CREDIT E5: ROOFTOP PV Note: See RoofPoint Credit E5 for more information. CREDIT E5: ROOFTOP SOLAR THERMAL Note: See RoofPoint Credit E5 for more information. CREDIT E6: ROOF DAYLIGHTING Note: See RoofPoint Credit E6 for more information. ROOFPOINT ROOF Enter surface area of RoofPoint Roof (Sq. Ft.) 100,000 Select R-Value for the RoofPoint Roof: R20 Select type of thermal break for the Base Case Roof: Staggered insulation, top layer(s) adhered (5% penalty) Select type of air barrier for the RoofPoint Roof: Roof membrane serves as air barrier (No penalty) Select type of roof surface for the RoofPoint Roof: High Reflective: Aged SR 60 Does the RoofPoint Roof include a PV system? Yes If yes, enter the system STC Rating (kw) 100 Does the RoofPoint Roof include a solar thermal system? Yes If yes, enter the system total collector area (FT 2 ) 120 Does the RoofPoint Roof include daylighting? Yes If yes, enter average illumination at floor level (FC) 10

Step 5: Assemble the Model Outputs UNIT LOADS (BTU / FT 2 ) 1. Heating Load 686 345 2. Cooling Load 13972 3786 3. Peak Demand Load (Note: Not Included in Net Load) 4192 1136 4. Thermal Bridging Penalty 2199 207 5. Air Movement Penalty 1466 0 6. Rooftop PV Offset 0-4569 7. Rooftop Solar Thermal Offset 0-120 8. Roof Daylighting Offset 0-824 TOTAL NET UNIT LOAD (BTU / FT 2 ) 18,323-1,175 TOTAL ROOF LOAD (BTU/Year) 1,832,250,000-117,496,041 NET ENERGY SAVINGS FOR ROOFPOINT ROOF (BTU / Year) 1,949,746,041 Plus Peak Load Demand Reduction (BTU / Year) 305,580,000 TOTAL NET ENERGY SAVINGS + PEAK LOAD DEMAND REDUCTION FOR ROOFPOINT ROOF (BTU / Year) 2,255,326,041 TOTAL CO 2 ENERGY 0FFSET FOR ROOFPOINT ROOF (Metric Tons / Year) 125

Step 6: Test the Model for Value Comparative value of key strategies Roof insulation Roof surface Rooftop energy Comparative value of key outcomes Net energy savings Peak energy savings

Testing the Model Insulation v. Roof Surface Relative Contribution of Insulation and Roof Surface

Testing the Model Roof Surface Reflectivity Net BTU for Medium / High / Extra High SR Roof (Compared to a Black Roof with Identical R Value)

Testing the Model Rooftop Energy Relative Load / Contribution Per Square (Zone 3A, R-20, SR60 Roof)

Testing the Model Peak v. Net Energy Net Versus Peak Savings for an SR60 /R20 Roof (Compared to an SR30 Roof with Identical R Value)

Step 7: Looking to the Future Future Refinements Local solar intensity factors for PV Improved daylighting model Improved carbon offset model Addition of embodied energy Conversion into app-type tool

Step 7: Looking to the Future Additional field testing You can help! Start by downloading the tool (It s free!)

Step 7: Looking to the Future Download your free copy of the RoofPoint Energy and Carbon Calculator at the RoofPoint web site: www.roofpoint.org News Press Releases Center Releases RoofPoint Energy and Carbon Calculator.

Dr. Jim Hoff VP Research Center for Environmental Innovation in Roofing 317.679.1542 jhoff@roofingcenter.org