Updates: LUR Rulemaking & FEMA Flood Mapping. Vince Mazzei, PE



Similar documents
Remaining Wetland Acreage 1,500, , ,040-39%

Frequently Asked Land Use Permitting Questions Post Superstorm Sandy Updated July 2nd, 2013

Floodplain 8-Step Process in accordance with Executive Order 11988: Floodplain Management. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

COMMUNITY CERTIFICATIONS

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA

NOTE: THIS IS A COURTESY COPY OF THIS RULE. ALL OF THE DEPARTMENT S RULES ARE COMPILED IN TITLE 7 OF THE NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.

Floodplain Development Land Use Review

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKLIST. Project Name: Site Plan No.:

REFERENCE. All National Grid personnel who plan and perform work involving protected water resources are responsible for:

King County, Washington Policies and Practice for the Use of Eminent Domain For Flood Risk Reduction

Regulatory Features of All Coastal and Inland Ecological Restoration Limited Projects

How To Amend A Stormwater Ordinance

N.J.A.C. 7:13 FLOOD HAZARD AREA CONTROL ACT RULES

3. The submittal shall include a proposed scope of work to confirm the provided project description;

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: November 7, 2013

MassDEP Natural Disaster Guidance for Coastal and Inland Wetland Resource Area Impacts: Hurricane or Tropical Storm Sandy

Why should communities invest in resiliency? What are the steps communities can take to become more resilient?

MASSACHUSETTS COASTAL NONPOINT PROGRAM NOAA/EPA DECISIONS ON CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

Lower Raritan Watershed Management Area Stormwater & Flooding Subcommittee Strategy Worksheet LRSW-S3C1

rescue and relief efforts in the aftermath of flooding, (iii) repair of flood damaged public facilities and utilities, and

Goal 1 To protect the public health, safety and property from the harmful effects of natural disasters.

Part Two Critical Areas

Town of Chatham Department of Community Development

Sustainability Brief: Water Quality and Watershed Integrity

SECTION 1.0 STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION AND PURPOSE

PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit

Presented by Dani Wise Johnson Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.

Series 2016A-2 (Green Bonds) Final Proceeds Allocation April 2016

City of Valdosta Land Development Regulations. Table of Contents

RE: Docket # COE ; ZRIN 0710 ZA05 Submitted via to NWP2012@usace.army.mil and Rulemaking Portal at

Adopted 9/23/98 CHATTAHOOCHEE CORRIDOR PLAN. The goals of the Chattahoochee Corridor Plan (hereinafter also referred to as the Plan ) are:

Flood Plain Reclamation to Enhance Resiliency Conserving Land in Urban New Jersey

Summary and Description of 2014 Enhancements to New Jersey Model Stormwater Control Ordinance for Municipalities

GROWER ADVISORY Agriculture Regulations of the Wetlands Protection Act

GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS

The answers to some of the following questions are separated into two major categories:

Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

Summary of the 2012 Nationwide Permits

Flood Hazard Area Technical Manual Section 8 Bank Stabilization and Stream Restoration

Infrastructure Flood Protection Guidance and Best Practices

Section 4 General Strategies and Tools

General Permit for Activities Promoting Waterway - Floodplain Connectivity [working title]

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Works

Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank

Capital Construction and Debt Service

Summary of the Proposed 2017 Nationwide Permits 1

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

Applying HUD s Floodplain Management and Wetlands Protection Standards U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Environment and

Laws and Regulatory Requirements to Consider Before You Build a Pond

Revising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan

ROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND

Chapter 3 SENSITIVE AREAS AND VEGETATED CORRIDORS

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project

A Self Assessment to Address Climate Change Readiness in Your Community Midwest Region

Alternative (Flexible) Mitigation Options Proposed Rule - Revised

HUDSON RIVER-BLACK RIVER REGULATING DISTRICT BOARD MEETING JUNE 10, 2014

Georgia Coastal Stormwater Supplement April 2009

Protecting Floodplain. While Reducing Flood Losses

Section 6: Mitigation Strategy

Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS WATERS OF THE U.S. PROPOSAL

Table of Contents. Introduction Guidance Permit fact sheet Completeness checklist. Introduction

A. General Information

MITIGATION STRATEGY OVERVIEW

A. Flood Management in Nevada

Work Breakdown Structure Element Dictionary. Final Design

HARDWICK TOWNSHIP WARREN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

ANGORA FIRE RESTORATION PROJECT

March 17, Dear Mr. Sullins:

GLOSSARY OF TERMS CHAPTER 11 WORD DEFINITION SOURCE. Leopold

APPENDIX K COASTAL RESOURCES

FAIRFAX WATER OCCOQUAN RESERVOIR SHORELINE EASEMENT POLICY. February 17, 2011

Section 401 Water Quality Certification

The Bond Release Process for New Subdivision Developments: An Overview for Homeowners Associations DRAFT Revised

TOPIC BILL FORMAT CHANGES (underline = additions; strikethrough = deletions) RATIONALE

A Developer s Guide: Watershed-Wise Development

5901 Milwaukee Street Planned Unit Development (GDP) (Second Addition to Grandview Commons)

REVISED GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PDR-99-02(G)(R-2) - GAMBLE CREEK, L.C./TWIN RIVER

What We Do: Wetlands, Wildlife Habitat & Flood Hazards in the Root River Watershed

Harris County Flood Control District. Policy, Criteria, and Procedure Manual

Appendix J Online Questionnaire

DELAWARE COUNTY STREAM CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TWO-YEAR ACTION PLAN FOR THE WEST BRANCH DELAWARE RIVER CANNONSVILLE RESERVOIR BASIN

Section 6: Mitigation Strategy

Shoreline Master Programs Handbook Chapter 15, Shoreline Stabilization

COASTAL APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR SITING PERMIT

CHAPTER 3 page 69 LOCAL FLOODPLAIN REGULATIONS AND NFIP STANDARDS

BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY

APPENDIX A: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CHECKLIST

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program

CITY OF NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT CITY PLAN DEPARTMENT 165 CHURCH STREET, 5 TH FLOOR, NEW HAVEN, CT PHONE FAX

FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION ORDINANCE

Oregon. Climate Change Adaptation Framework

Town of Elkton & Cecil Soil Conservation District Checklist for Joint Agency Review Stormwater Management / Erosion and Sediment Control

Flood Mitigation in the NYC West-of-Hudson Watershed A guide to Programs, Agencies and Funding Sources for Municipalities and Property Owners

CASS COUNTY COMMISSION POLICY MANUAL ADOPTED DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1998 PAGE 1 OF 9

GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES

Restoring Ecosystems. Ecosystem Restoration Services

Community Workshop 5. Overarching Goals for Machado Lake Ecosystem and Wilmington Drain Multi-Use Projects

Transcription:

Updates: LUR Rulemaking & FEMA Flood Mapping Vince Mazzei, PE New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Land Use Regulation February 11, 2015

Today s topics: Brief overview of NJ s rulemaking process Newly adopted Land Use fees Pending CZM rule proposal Impending FHA rule proposal Ongoing FEMA mapping efforts

NJ Rulemaking 1. NJDEP holds stakeholder meetings Seeking input from staff, regulated community, State & local governments, etc., on what works and doesn t work in existing rules 2. NJDEP staff writes rule proposal Includes detailed description (summary) of what is proposed to be added, deleted, or amended, why these changes are being made, and what impact they are expected to have

NJ Rulemaking 3. Proposal is reviewed & approved by: NJDEP management & attorneys Attorney General s Office Governor s Office NJ Office of Administrative Law 4. Proposal is published in NJ Register 60-day public comment period provided

NJ Rulemaking 5. NJDEP staff reviews comments and prepares adoption document Comments/questions are answered Rule is clarified Minor issues/mistakes resolved Major issues require new rulemaking to fix

NJ Rulemaking 6. Adoption is reviewed & approved by: NJDEP management and attorneys Attorney General s Office Governor s Office NJ Office of Administrative Law 7. Adoption is published in NJ Register New rules are generally effective upon publication

New Land Use Application Fees Effective 2/2/15 Restructures fee calculation for: CAFRA Waterfront development Flood hazard area Freshwater wetlands Stormwater reviews Does not affect: Highlands Tidelands

New Land Use Application Fees Applies to any application deemed complete for review on or after 2/2/15 If an application is received prior to 2/2/15, and is determined to be complete, new fees do not apply If an application is received prior to 2/2/15, but is rejected as incomplete, new fees apply

New Land Use Application Fees Increasing fees was necessary to help cover cost of running program Represent about 35% increase in fees overall Some application fees are increased more than others, and some not at all, in order to make fees more proportional to NJDEP review time All GPs = $1,000 Any IP for single-family home or duplex = $2,000 CAFRA and waterfront development fees greatly simplified Statutory $30K cap still in place for CAFRA & WFD

New Land Use Application Fees Questions?

Proposed Coastal Rules Proposed (published in NJR): 6/2/14 Comment period ended: 8/1/14 Download the proposal at: http://www.nj.gov/dep/rules/ proposals/20140602a.pdf

Proposed Coastal Rules Goals Combine N.J.A.C. 7:7 & 7:7E into one chapter Align permit-processing standards with upcoming flood hazard area (FHA) & freshwater wetlands (FWW) rules Add mitigation & conservation restriction requirements similar to FWW rules Adopt 2 new permits-by-rule, 2 new general permits-bycertification, and 1 new general permit Amend 5 existing general permits Amend certain IP standards

Proposed Coastal Rules Amendments Aligns application review process with upcoming FHA and FWW rules: Emergency authorizations Pre-application conferences Application requirements Requirements for an applicant to provide public notice Application review Permit conditions and changes to issued permits Requests for adjudicatory hearings

Proposed Coastal Rules Amendments New mitigation subchapter Similar sections as new FHA and FWW rules All mitigation requirements are in one subchapter (SAV, ISS, Wetland, Shellfish, Riparian Zone) Incorporates banking Conservation restrictions Matches new FHA rules

Proposed Coastal Rules Two new permits-by-rule 1. Pesticide application in coastal wetlands to control invasive plant species For less than ¼ acre of disturbance Must be conducted in accordance with an NJDEP aquatic pesticide permit 2. Installation of a pool/spa on a bulkheaded lot

Proposed Coastal Rules Two general permits-by-certification Instant online application Applicant certifies each standard is met 1. Reconstruction of a legally existing functioning bulkhead in-place or upland of the existing bulkhead 2. Construction of piers, docks, pilings, and boatlifts in manmade lagoons

Proposed Coastal Rules New general permit Pesticide application in coastal wetlands to control invasive plant species For projects > ¼ acre Cannot affect T&E species or certain plants Must be conducted in accordance with an NJDEP aquatic pesticide permit

Proposed Coastal Rules Amended general permits GP for construction of a single-family or duplex dwelling is amended to apply to one or two single-family or duplex dwellings. GP for construction or reconstruction of bulkheads are amended to allow the beneficial use of the dredged material as fill and to modify the requirements for bulkheads constructed in V zones. GP for investigation, cleanup, removal, or remediation of hazardous substances and geotechnical soil borings are proposed to be amended to reflect changes to the Technical Requirements for Site Remediation, N.J.A.C. 7:26E, and the Department s organizational structure.

Proposed Coastal Rules Amended general permits GP for construction of piers, docks (including jet ski ramps), pilings, and boatlifts in man-made lagoons is proposed to be modified to allow for alternative design rather than the currently prescribed plank spacing requirements. GP for dredging and management of material from a marina deposited as a result of a storm event for which the Governor declared a State of Emergency is proposed to be amended to provide that the Department will make an acceptable use determination for the beneficial use of the dredged material.

Proposed Coastal Rules Other amendments Marinas Amendments allow expansion of existing marinas and the construction of new marinas in infill situations within shellfish habitat Amendments allow construction of a restaurant at certain new or existing marina facilities

Proposed Coastal Rules Other amendments Dredging The definition of maintenance dredging is amended to provide flexibility in demonstrating that a proposed dredging activity qualifies as maintenance dredging. Amendments recognize environmental dredging, which is dredging to remove contaminated sediments from a waterbody for remediation purposes.

Proposed Coastal Rules Other amendments Dredging (cont.) A new special area rule addressing existing dredged material management areas is being proposed Recognition that these areas serve a critical function as management areas for sediments removed from existing navigation channels and marinas to maintain recreational and commercial boating and marine commerce in the State s waters Portions of the Department's dredging technical manual are incorporated in the CZM rules as a regulatory appendix

Proposed Coastal Rules Other amendments High rise rule clarified: applies only to the portion of a building above 60 feet

Proposed Coastal Rules Questions?

FHA Rulemaking Schedule File with OLA: March 2015 Proposal published: April 2015 60-day comment period ends: June 2015 Adoption: Fall 2015

FHA Anticipated Amendments 1. Delete all references to acid-producing soil deposits Eliminate special requirements for work in areas with acid soils Reduce riparian zone along streams with acid soils from 150 feet to 50 feet Defer to local soil conservation districts for review of impacts to areas with acid soils

FHA Anticipated Amendments 2. Delete special water resource protection area from stormwater management rule No more Functional Value Analysis No reliance on USGS maps or soil surveys to determine location of SWRPA No prohibition on development within inner 150 Rule will rely on riparian zone requirements for determining allowable disturbance

FHA Anticipated Amendments 3. Delete prohibition on stormwater discharges within 150 & 300 riparian zone Water quality design storm must be infiltrated outside the RZ where possible Where not possible, require 95% TSS removal for discharges within 300 riparian zone Allow discharges directly into surface waters This will address significant concerns raised by SCD regarding erosion at discharges

FHA Anticipated Amendments 4. Add flexibility to riparian zone standards Increase allowable area of RZ disturbance Remove hardship exception requirement if limits under an IP are exceeded Add flexibility for projects in actively disturbed areas (lawns, meadows, agricultural fields) Remove setback requirement along impounded fluvial waters and tidal waters, where the bank has a bulkhead or revetment

FHA Anticipated Amendments 5. Incorporate riparian zone clarifications Clarify what a top of bank is and how to determine its location Clarify that temporary disturbance to actively disturbed areas does not count against overall RZ disturbance limits Clarify that there are no limits to disturbance of areas occupied by structures

FHA Anticipated Amendments 5. Riparian zone clarifications (cont.) Clarify what can and cannot be built within 25 feet of top of bank Clarify that piped streams do not have a RZ Clarify that the RZ arcs at end of a stream, but not at a pipe entrance

FHA Anticipated Amendments 6. Total of 13 general permits

FHA Anticipated Amendments 6. General permits (cont.)

FHA Anticipated Amendments 6. General permits (cont.)

FHA Anticipated Amendments 7. Total of 15 general permits-by-certification

FHA Anticipated Amendments 7. General permits-by-certification (cont.)

FHA Anticipated Amendments 7. General permits-by-certification (cont.)

FHA Anticipated Amendments 8. Expand/clarify/combine 47 existing permits-byrule and increase to a total of 63 permits-by-rule Solar panels In-kind replacement of certain culverts ROW maintenance Docks & piers Handicap ramps/access Repairing septic systems Monitoring wells and soils borings Invasive vegetation removal & enhancement activities Forestry activities approved under a forestry management plan Variable message signs, light poles, etc.

FHA Anticipated Amendments 9. Bridges & culverts Facilitate minor road widening and bridge/culvert replacement projects Clarify when bridges and three-sided culverts are required Clarify which flood events need to be analyzed for new and reconstructed structures Encourage preservation/placement of terrestrial crossings within bridges and culverts

FHA Anticipated Amendments 10. Verifications Expand types of calculations that can be used to determine flood hazard area Allow footprint of disturbance verifications (similar to a FWW letter of interpretation) Allow verification of RZ or FHA alone Stop requiring verifications for work by public entities in existing right-of-way, such as for a bridge replacement

FHA Anticipated Amendments 11. Provide additional riparian zone mitigation options Creation: day-lighting streams (removing structures that enclose a stream, such as a culvert) Restoration: removing structures and planting trees Enhancement: planting trees to upgrade ecologic benefits of area devoid of trees Preservation: placing a conservation easement on forested land Banking: credit system, like FWW rules, for riparian zones planted with trees

FHA Anticipated Amendments 12. Align administrative procedures with FWW & Coastal rules Definitions Contact information General provisions for PBRs and General permits Mitigation Conservation restrictions Emergency authorizations Pre-application conferences Application requirements Public notice Application review Permit conditions The modification, transfer, suspension and termination of approvals Requests for adjudicatory hearings Enforcement provisions

FHA Anticipated Amendments Questions?

FEMA flood mapping FEMA is replacing advisory maps by developing preliminary maps, which are more accurate Preliminary maps will eventually be published in the Federal Register and FEMA will hold public meetings in affected communities Once adopted by FEMA, maps will become effective ADVISORY PRELIMINARY EFFECTIVE

FEMA flood mapping Effective Flood Insurance Rate Maps http://msc.fema.gov Preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Maps http://www.region2coastal.com/preliminaryfirms Source: FEMA

FEMA preliminary mapping is now available for all eastern/coastal counties in NJ, as well as portions of New York

Incorporating FEMA maps NJDEP is working with FEMA to remap the State s flood hazard areas People will easily see NJDEP & FEMA mapping online FEMA is putting NJDEP s design flood elevation on its maps

Incorporating FEMA maps If FEMA adopts a map showing NJDEP design flood elevation, it will automatically become a NJDEP map and replace any old flood maps FEMA recently adopted such mapping along the Delaware River in Hunterdon, Warren & Sussex Counties

Determining NJ design flood elevation In tidal areas DFE = FEMA 100-year flood Use FEMA effective map or preliminary map, whichever has the higher flood elevation

Determining NJ design flood elevation In fluvial areas: DFE = 100-year flood + factor-of-safety NJDEP flood maps are based on 125% of 100-year flow Use: Highest FEMA elevation above + 1 foot or Design flood elevation from NJDEP mapping whichever is higher or Self-calculate flood using 125% of 100-yr flow

Determining NJ design flood elevation Option 1: Use the higher of: Method 1 (Department delineation method) Method 2 (FEMA tidal method); or Method 3 (FEMA fluvial method) Option 2: Calculate the flood hazard area: Method 4 (FEMA hydraulic method); or Method 6 (Calculation method) Option 3: If no NJDEP or FEMA map exist: Method 5 (Approximation method)

Determining NJ design flood elevation Exception: If NJDEP has incorporated a FEMA map that depicts the NJ design flood elevation, then you must use that map or else apply to NJDEP to amend the map. Currently this only applies to the Delaware River in Hunterdon, Warren & Sussex Counties Will apply to more waters as NJDEP continues to adopt more FEMA mapping

Recent Executive Order Signed by President Obama 1/30/15 Establishes a Federal Flood Risk Management Standard to reduce the cost of future flood disasters Requires Federally funded projects that impact floodplains to meet higher flood risk standards Does not affect flood insurance rates

Recent Executive Order FEMA also released draft guidelines for implementing the standard for public comment Agencies will be able to implement the standard in a number of ways and seek input from the public and stakeholders before doing so Fact Sheet: http://www.fema.gov/media-library- data/1422640139302- a155bb3c12bd7bdbe7f8d8aaf2c30eb5/2015-01-30- flood-standards-fact-sheet.pdf

Recent Executive Order Three options: 1. Use data and methods informed by best-available, actionable climate science 2. Build: 2 feet above the 100-year flood elevation for standard projects 3 feet above the 100-year flood elevation for critical buildings like hospitals and evacuation centers 3. Build to the 500-year flood elevation

Questions?

For More Information: Vince Mazzei, PE Supervising Environmental Engineer NJDEP Division of Land Use Regulation Trenton, NJ 08625 Phone: (609) 633-2201 Email: vincent.mazzei@dep.nj.gov Website: www.nj.gov/dep/landuse