Radioactive waste managment in Estonia past, present and future



Similar documents
Treatment Centers for Radioactive Waste

the French experience

Application Note. ipix A Gamma imager to support various applications

Developing a Safety Case for Ontario Power Generation s L&ILW Deep Geologic Repository

Radioactive Waste Management at Paks NPP

Decommissioning situation of Nuclear Power Plant in Japan

Andreeva Bay Facilities for SNF Management. CEG IAEA Workshop - February 2010

Chemical Decontamination and Fluid Handling Services

7. Chemical Waste Disposal Procedures

UDOT SPILL PREVENTION and RESPONSE PLAN for CONSTRUCTION SITES

Activities of Nuclear Damage Compensation & Decommissioning Facilitation Corporation (NDF) Yasuharu Igarashi

Overview of the Multi-nuclide Removal Equipment (ALPS) at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. March 29, 2013 Tokyo Electric Power Company

Nuclear Waste Management in Finland

British Nuclear Group Reactor Sites Chemistry Issues NuSAC SCR Meeting - April 4 th 2006

Mechanical Engineering and Material Handling Aspects of NSDF

GUIDELINE FOR SAFETY IN THE HANDLING OF FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS

Liquid Effluent Treatment Plant (LETP) Land Clean-Up

11. Radioactive Waste Management AP1000 Design Control Document

February 19, Senior Fellow, Nuclear Energy Systems & Services Division Power Systems Company

Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management

WASTE WATER TREATMENT for surface treatment applications

Replacement of steam generators at Ringhals nuclear power plant.

TYPICAL FIRE SAFETY INSPECTION VIOLATIONS

Waste Volume Reduction by Studsvik Nuclear AB. Anders Stenmark and Bo Wirendal September 16th, 2010

APPENDIX CC NUCLEAR WASTE STORAGE

Disposal of chemical waste must be regarded as an integral part of all research projects and teaching programs involving chemical use.

BECHTEL JACOBS COMPANY ORR WASTE CERTIFICATION PROGRAM DOCUMENT CONTROL SYSTEM

Best Basement Water Management Practices

Lessons learned from the radiological accident in Mayapuri, New Delhi, India

THE DECOMMISSIONING OF COMMERCIAL MAGNOX GAS XA COOLED REACTOR POWER STATIONS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM

Spill Containment. Contents

Attachment G-1: Pit Latrine Diagram. Fig E.1a: Pit Latrine. Fig E.1b: Plan View of Twin Pits

Radiological mapping and characterization at the Barsebäck nuclear power plant

Waste Handling & Disposal

Office for Nuclear Regulation

Hazard Classification of the Remote Handled Low Level Waste Disposal Facility

DECOMMISSIONING OF THE GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH REACTOR. Steve Marske, Robert Eby, Lark Lundberg CH2M HILL

Minnesota Department of Transportation Best Management Practices (BMP) for Concrete Washout May 2009, v5

Basic principles of radioactive waste management

Position paper on the implications of deep sea disposal of radioctive waste

Checking of quality on production

Mechanical Systems Competency 1.20

The integrity evaluation of the reactor building at unit4 in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station

Proper Segregation and Disposal of Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLRW) at Wayne State University

Spent Fuel Project Office Interim Staff Guidance - 17 Interim Storage of Greater Than Class C Waste

Azeri, Chirag & Gunashli Full Field Development Phase 3 Environmental & Socio-economic Impact Assessment. A10.1 Introduction...

WASTE STREAM 2Y51 Analytical Services Process Facilities - North Labs

SOP 4: Spill Response and Cleanup Procedures SOP 4: SPILL RESPONSE AND CLEANUP PROCEDURES

WASTE STREAM 2F35 Excellox-Type Transport Flasks and French-Design Dry Flasks

RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DECOMMISSIONING IN FINLAND

Facility Support Services

Outdoor Storage of Raw Materials SC-33

Cardok Sàrl CP37 CH-1295 Tannay Switzerland Phone:

Improper storage of fuel on construction sites will increase the risk of water pollution that may occur as a result of leaks or spills.

Radiological characterisation by means of 3D-laser modelling and positioning of measurements

RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMMES IN OECD/NEA MEMBER COUNTRIES MEXICO [2005] NATIONAL NUCLEAR ENERGY CONTEXT

50AI01oe 02/15. Labko GRP cesspools. Instructions for installation, operation and maintenance

SECTION ABANDONMENT OF SEWER MAINS

Environmental Remediation Examples and Remediation Strategic Planning

PRESENT ISSUES FOR CENTRE DE LA MANCHE DISPOSAL FACILITY

Guide to nuclear decommissioning

PAINT REMOVAL SYSTEM PAINT REMOVAL SPECIFICATION SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT FOR LEAD PAINT REMOVAL

Decommissioning and clearance of laboratories

PLUMBING MAINTENANCE WORK FOR TOILETS IN HEAD OFFICE, SUPPLYCO ESTIMATE

PRESENTATION ON REPAIR AND REHABILITATION OF BUILDINGS DAMAGED IN EARTHQUAKE. By H P Gupta & D K Gupta

Nuclear power plant systems, structures and components and their safety classification. 1 General 3. 2 Safety classes 3. 3 Classification criteria 3

VOLUME AND SURFACE AREAS OF SOLIDS

WASTE STORAGE AND COLLECTION GUIDANCE FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS

WWER Type Fuel Manufacture in China

Role and tasks of Arpa Piemonte in controlling and monitoring of ionizing and non ionizing radiation. G.. d Amored

SPILL PREVENTION, CONTROL, AND COUNTER MEASURES PLAN (SPCC)

Spanish Scenario for Spent Fuel Management

Make Your Own SNOWBREEZE AC For Rs.1500 ($30) Can be converted into an energy saving and humidified room heater in winter

Very low level waste management in Spain and in France

THE MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, PHYSICAL PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION

Chemical Storage and Spill Response Guidelines

15 April 2015 Nuclear Regulation Authority, Japan. 1. Overview

IPR Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory. International Progress Report. Temperature Buffer Test. Report for retaining plug and anchoring

March 2006 DIVISION 3 - CW 2140-R3 TABLE OF CONTENTS

SEPTIC TANKS FOR THE COLLECTION & SETTLEMENT OF DOMESTIC SEWAGE

Successful Cesium Removal Campaign at the Loviisa NPP, Finland Esko Tusa Fortum Power and Heat Oy POB Fortum, Finland

Long Term Storage and Transportation Issues for Used Nuclear Fuel. Office of Used Nuclear Fuel Disposition R &D Mission

Cavity Drain R20 is manufactured from1.0mm thick black high density polyethylene with studs approximately 20mm high.

LABORATORY SAFETY INSPECTION CHECKLIST

Instruction manual of pumps WQ, WQF, SN, Furiatka, Furia, KRAKEN, BIG, IP, IPE, SWQ, CTR

Waterproofing System for Wastewater Tanks in Petrochemical Industries and Refineries

Florida Department of Environmental Protection

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SAFETY/RISK MANAGEMENT Contractor Management (including Sub-Contractors)

UK Strategy for the Management of Solid Low Level Radioactive Waste from the Nuclear Industry

Extraction Oil and Gas, LLC. Diamond Valley Central Oil Terminal Waste Management Plan

SAVANNAH RIVER SITE S MACROENCAPSULATION PROCESSING OF LESS THAN 3700 BQ/GM1 TRU ISOTOPIC MIXED WASTE FOR DISPOSAL AT THE NEVADA TEST SITE

Hydraulic control unit series

Spill Containment. Contents

ANTEP 2015 Needs from China (NNSA)

Transcription:

Radioactive waste managment in Estonia past, present and future Ivo Tatrik ivo.tatrik@alara.ee

Content 1. Status of ALARA 2. Decomission of Paldiski Former Navy Submarine Training Centre 3. Decomission of Tammiku disposal site 4. Future tasks

Status of A.L.A.R.A. Estonian state owned radioactive waste management agency Established 1995 for decommission and clean up of Former Nuclear Submarine Trainig centre in Paldiski Operates modern Interim Storage in Paldiski and is involved with decomission of Tammiku ne-su disposal facility Emergency response for orphan sources

Radioactive waste storage facilities in Estonia Paldiski site Tammiku disposal site

Paldiski site history, present, future Start of the building 1960 Reactor characterisrics Unit 1 Unit 2 Thermal power 70 MW 90 MW Reactor type PWR / BM-A PWR / BM-4 Encasement (submarine hull segment) diam. 7.5 m 9.5 m Enrichment of fuel (in 235 U) 20 % 20 % Total energy load [MWh] 300 000 400 000 First criticality April 1968 Feb 1983 Shut down Jan 1989 Dec 1989 Refuelling 1980 never Operating time 13 781 h 5 333 h second load 7 040 h Fuel removed and sent back to Russia 1995 1995

Reactors condition after leaving of Soviet troops The reactors are closed with the standard lid welded to the reactor body, all holes in the reactor lid were plugged with welded plugs Absorbers have been removed from filters of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd loops All the systems of the components, pipelines and tanks have been drained All pipelines connected with the system of the 1 st loop and the draining system were plugged with welded plugs High-pressure gas and air have been removed from cylinders and systems of the reactor compartments

Reactors condition after leaving of Soviet troops After tightness testing, the outside surfaces of the body and the bulkheads of the reactor compartment and platforms were painted Durability of the reactor compartments bodies prepared for prolonged storage is designed for maximum design earthquake of magnitude 6,7 by Richter scale

Reactors condition after leaving of Soviet troops The systems were drained, but not dried. The equipment, pipelines and tanks contain dead remaining water stock in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th loops amounting to about 1370 litres for unit #1 (360 litres inside the primary circuit), and 2285 litres for unit #2 (600 litres inside the primary circuit) Risk of dispersion of radioactivity during the next 50 years can not be ignored presence of water in primary and secondary systems may trigger corrosion provisions that have been made against humidity effects regarding primary circuit and reactor compartments is not sufficient there are systems arranged for checking efficiency of radioactivity confinement provisions fire risk is not minimised

EC Project for Evaluation of Management Routes for the Paldiski Sarcophagi Main purpose of the project was to define the most feasible rational management route for the two submarine reactors at Paldiski regarding the cost and radiological impact to the public and the environment Contractors: Technicatome, France and BNFL, UK Subcontractors: ALARA Ltd. and VNIPIET, Russia Recommended option was full dismantling after safe storage of 50 years. Improvement of sarcophagi system had to be carried out as soon as possible.

Decommissioning of the Liquid Waste Store (1999-2004) Two tanks contained about 120 m 3 waste in total - Sand, gravel, ion exchange resins, evaporation concentrates, flocculation slurry, etc. - The dominating radionuclides were 137 Cs, 90 Sr and 60 Co, total activity about 225 GBq Totally 104 waste packages produced Facility demolished 2004

Decommissioning of the Solid Waste Storage Cell 4A, mainly plastic sheets and sacks, buckets and small cans etc, filled up to the roof of the cell. Dose rate < 20 Sv/h Cell 1, miscellaneous material, 8 steam generators and 9 control rods. Dose rate 5-9 msv/h Cell 5, 11 control rods, some lead containers with sealed sources and a pile of miscellaneous waste. Dose rate from > 10 Sv/h at the bottom of the cell to 200 msv/h at the roof level of building.

Installation and waste retriewal from SWS Low-pressure in-drum compactor for soft waste Two radio-operated cranes Hydraulic cutter TV cameras and monitors

Waste packages from SWS 76 pcs 1 m 3 concrete containers; 3 Control Rod Containers (CRC); Wall thickness = 525 mm Outer diameter = 1200 mm Height = 2000 mm Weight = 7600 kg 8 Steam generators; 67 pcs 200 l drums (later placed into concrete containers).

Dismantling of Liquid Waste Treatment Facility (2000-2003) 16 x 30 m, five floors above the ground level, two below Sand filter cartridges, ion exchange columns, flocculation tanks, evaporators, etc. Six waste receiving tanks Two control tanks for purified water prior discharge

Interim storage in Paldiski site Built 1997, beside reactor sarcophagi nr. 2; Made from ferroconcrete, wall thickness 25 cm; overall dimensions: length 13,25 m; width 11,8 m; height 10 m; 2 sections each for 301 standard containers; 50% filled Metal and concrete containers with outer dimensions1,2x1,2x1,2 m; useful volume of container 1 m 3. Wall thickness 10 cm; Fits all generated institutional and Tammiku waste but not RC waste

EU Phare project Safe long-term storage of Paldiski sarcophagi and related dismantling activities. During the period 2005-2008 there were several (non radiological) works done on the site under EU Phare project Safe long-term storage of Paldiski sarcophagi and related dismantling activities. The main objective of the project was to guarantee the safe storage of the reactor compartments for a period of at least 50 years. By that time Estonia should have radioactive waste disposal facility, which could accommodate waste arising from decommissioning of the reactor compartments (approximately 720-2070 m3). Sarcophagis monitoring programme installed.

1995 2001 2003 2008

Future activities Site selection project for final repository Preliminary studies for decomissioning of reactor compartments (RC) Decomissioning of RC starting at least 2040

Operated 1960-1995; Tammiku disposal site Radon type facility (near surface); For institutional waste; Solid waste storage outer dimensions 17,8 x 7,9 x 3,3 m (below ground). Contained about 110 m 3 waste. Liquid waste tank volume 600 m 3, filled capacity 200 m 3 ;

Decomission of liquid waste storage (2001) Approximately 200 m 3 of liquid waste; Solid material filtered out; Radiological and chemical tests: - main isotopes C-14 and H-3; - activity of isotopes below recommended clearance levels; - chemical composition and concentration suitable for free release Decision: release to Baltic Sea after recieving licence from regulatory body; Sludge fixed in concrete; Tank demolished

Reasons for solid waste storage decomission Study from University of Tartu demonstrated future problems if situation stays as it is (2002); - both in farm and road construction scenarios indicated possible accumulated effective doses will exceed up to two magnitudes (250 msv/y and 26 msv/y respectivly) of maximum allowed doses (0,3 msv/y) To avoid future problems and fulfil international requirements it was decided disposal wault should be emptied and demolished; EU membership; With the help of Swedish radwaste managment company SKB were estimated possible options for waste retrieval (2005); 4 options were considered. Selected one was retrieval of waste and temporary packing on site, transport to Paldiski site and sorting and final packaging in Paldiski site.

Challenges in Tammiku Estimated total activity of facility according to documents was 60 TBq (2005). Dominating radionuclides: 137 Cs, 90 Sr and 14 C. Section 6 contained 2 metal boxes with sealed sources with dose rate 1,5 Sv/h on the box surface. Based on documents 90% of facility s activity was in these boxes. Safe retrieval, packing and transport of these boxes was primary task. Other 99% of waste LLW and VLLW

Environmental impact asessment (EIA) was accepted in December 2007. Licence for waste removal issued in September 2008. Retrieval, packing and transport of 2 metal boxes was made in November 2008

LLW and VLLW will be preliminary sorted in Tammiku if possible. Complete sorting, characterization and conditioning will be made in Paldiski site where suitable facilities were built 2007.

Retrieval of LLW and VLLW started 2009 and will be finished 2011.

Waste sorting Sealed sources Compressable waste Concrete waste Contaminated wood Liquid waste Toxic waste Biological waste

After waste removal there is planned facility cleaning 2012-2013. New licence needed! Facility demolishing 2013. Environmental monitoring 2013-2015. Green field are 2015.

Thank You