INTERCONNECTED VOIP REGULATORY COMPLIANCE MANUAL

Similar documents
VoIP Service Provider Regulatory Compliance Guide:

FCC Regulatory Compliance Training

Federal Universal Service System

Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Core-Edge Working Group Meeting, September 28-29, 2004 Chintan Vaishnav Research Assistant, MIT CFP

ORDER National Policy. Effective Date 09/21/09. Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Security Policy SUBJ:

Regulatory and Tax Issues Impacting Non-Interconnected VoIP and Other One-Way VoIP Services

Calling All Countries: The VoIP Revolution is Here!

Regulatory,Taxand BusinessImplicationsof. RelatedtoEnhanced Communications

` Instructions for Completing the Service Provider and Billed Entity Identification Number and Contact Information Form

Legal Alert: FCC Imposes Additional USF Contribution Obligations on Interconnected VoIP Providers, Increases Wireless Safe Harbor

CALEA Monitoring Report for Broadband Access and VOIP Services

White Paper Understanding and Navigating Your Telecommunications Tax and Regulatory Requirements

VoIP Regulation Klaus Nieminen Helsinki University of Technology

Addendum StartPage: 0

Implementing InterCall: USF Implications for the Conference Call Industry

Voice over Internet Protocol. Kristie Prinz. The Prinz Law Office

How To Regulate Voice Over Internet Protocol (Voip) In The Uk

A Webinar March

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C COMMENTS OF THE NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF THE RATEPAYER ADVOCATE

Regulatory Update with a Touch of HIPAA

The State of 911 Webinar Series. National 911 Program January 24, :00 PM

The treatment of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) under the EU Regulatory Framework

VoIP / SIP Planning and Disclosure

The Global Regulatory Struggle to Address IP Voice and Video Applications

Good Filing Practices

How To File the FCC Form 499-A

Regulatory Landscape: FCC Regulation of Non-Interconnected VoIP Services and the Cloud

INSPECTOR GENERAL STATEMENT ON THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION S MAJOR MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES FISCAL YEAR 2005

Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP)

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Understanding Universal Service Reform. Jonathan S. Marashlian, Esq. Robert Dumas, CPA

Barbados Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Policy

REGULATORY FEES FACT SHEET

CANADIAN SIP TRUNKING MARKET REPORT

IT Security Handbook. Incident Response and Management: Targeted Collection of Electronic Data

CONSULTATION. National Numbering Plan Review. A short Consultation issued by the Telecommunications Regulatory Authority 28 August 2007

Methods for Lawful Interception in IP Telephony Networks Based on H.323

choice. call. telephone. Consumer Assistance It s your It s your It s your Dear Consumer, A PSC Consumer Guide

VERIZON COMMENTS REGARDING STAFF S LATEST DRAFT RULES FOR MULTILINE TELEPHONE SYSTEM ( MLTS ) 911 CALLS

WHITE PAPER. Gaining Total Visibility for Lawful Interception

CHAPTER EMERGENCY SERVICES COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

Low Income Program. Best Practices

Identity Theft Prevention Policy

ENTERPRISE VOICE SERVICE TERMS. Enterprise Voice Service Terms

ATA: An Analogue Telephone Adapter is used to connect a standard telephone to a high-speed modem to facilitate VoIP and/or calls over the Internet.

White Paper. Is VoIP Without E9-1-1 Worth the Risk? Challenges, Approaches, and Recommendations for VoIP Service Providers

Washington Parish Communications District 805 Pearl Street Franklinton, Louisiana (985)

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON D.C

US Business Services 2015

FCC Urban Rates Survey Data Collection. Filing Instructions

Submission by the Asia Pacific Carriers Coalition

Regulation of New Technologies: IP Telephony and Next Generation Networks

(202) FCC ADOPTS ORDER TO ENABLE LAW ENFORCEMENT TO ACCESS CERTAIN BROADBAND AND VoIP PROVIDERS

NBI/Michael Sone ING

RONAN TELEPHONE COMPANY BROADBAND PROVIDER DISCLOSURES November 20, 2011

Troy Cablevision, Inc. Subscriber Privacy Policy

Corporate Policy and Procedure

REACH LTD. SUBMISSION IN RESPONSE TO IDA S PUBLIC CONSULTATION POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR IP TELEPHONY AND ELECTRONIC NUMBERING IN SINGAPORE

THE FCA INSPECTOR GENERAL: A COMMITMENT TO PUBLIC SERVICE

May 20, Request for Information (RFI) VRS Platform Providers

Telecommunications Deregulation: Updating the Scorecard for 2013

CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE, INC. Privacy Policy

POSITION PAPER. Regulation of Voice over Internet Protocol Services. Position Paper No. 1 of 2007 LAU/0504/054

Transcription:

INTERCONNECTED VOIP REGULATORY COMPLIANCE MANUAL Prepared and maintained by: The CommLaw Group www.commlawgroup.com 1420 Spring Hill Road, Suite 205 McLean, VA 22102 Regulatory Compliance Guide for Telecommunications Services and Interconnected VoIP Providers Tel: 703-714-1300 E-mail: mail@commlawgroup.com

The CommLaw Group www.commlawgroup.com No part of the material contained herein may be reproduced by any mechanical, photographic, or electronic process, or in the form of a photographic recording, nor may it be stored in a retrieval system, transmitted or otherwise copied for private, public or commercial use, reposted, disclosed, or redistributed, without prior written permission from the holders. copyright The CommLaw Group www.commlawgroup.com

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. FEDERAL REGULATIONS SUMMARY 1-1 2. LICENSING & REGISTRATION 2-1 FCC REGISTRATION NUMBER (FRN) 2-1 499-A REGISTRATION 2-2 3. CUSTOMER PROPRIETARY NETWORK INFORMATION (CPNI) 3-1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 3-1 REPORTING 3-4 4. COMMUNICATIONS ASSISTANCE FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT ACT (CALEA) 4-1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 4-1 REPORTING 4-4 5. EMERGENCY SERVICES (E911) 5-1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 5-1 REPORTING 5-3 ACCESS 5-6 E911 ACCURACY AND RELIABILITY REQUIREMENTS 5-8 6. UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND (USF) 6-1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 6-1 DETERMINING USF CONTRIBUTIONS 6-4 WHOLESALE REVENUE VALIDATION AND REPORTING 6-9 7. TELECOMMUNICATIONS RELAY SERVICE (TRS)7-1 TECHNICAL & REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 7-1 TRS CONTRIBUTIONS 7-2 THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY COMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO ACCESSIBILITY ACT OF 2010 _ 7-3 8. ADDITIONAL FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS 8-1 VoIP Compliance Manual i Current as of: 8/01/2011

ANNUAL FCC REGULATORY FEES 8-1 NANP ADMINISTRATION SUPPORT 8-1 LOCAL NUMBER PORTABILITY AMINISTRATION SUPPORT 8-2 FCC RED-LIGHT POLICIES 8-3 9. INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC & REVENUE REPORTING 9-1 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 9-1 10. LOCAL TELEPHONE & BROADBAND INTERNET ACCESS LINES REPORTING 10-1 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 10-1 11. NETWORK NEUTRALITY 11-1 GENERAL OVERVIEW 11-1 12. SERVICE DISCONTINUANCE 12-1 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 12-1 13. CONSUMER PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS 13-1 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION JURISDICTION 13-1 TRUTH-IN-BILLING 13-2 FEDERAL REGULATORY CHARGE LABELING REQUIREMENTS 13-5 14. STATE LEGISLATION & REGULATION 14-1 FEDERAL PREEMPTION 14-1 STATE EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANS 14-3 STATE CONSUMER PROTECTION LAWS 14-6 STATE REGULATION OF INTERCONNECTED VOIP 14-7 APPENDICES APPENDIX A - SUMMARY OF FEDERAL REGULATORY ACTION APPENDIX B - STATE LEGISLATIVE & REGULATORY MATRIX APPENDIX C - THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF VOIP REGULATION APPENDIX D - SAMPLE FCC FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS APPENDIX E - OVERVIEW OF CANADIAN VOIP REGULATION VoIP Compliance Manual ii Current as of: 8/01/2011

INTRODUCTION Within the last decade, Voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP, has grown from a nascent, unregulated industry into a potential replacement service for traditional telephony. While the growth in internet-based communication services has yet to completely eradicate existing wireline services, the emergence of VoIP as a strong competing alternative has recently caused Federal and State regulatory agencies to re-examine their unfettered treatment of IPbased communications services. The official position of both Federal and State regulators has been to maintain a light-touch regulatory approach to VoIP services. Nevertheless, the emergence of VoIP as a viable alternative to existing telephone service has raised the specter of regulatory oversight for certain aspects of VoIP. Thus far, comprehensive Congressional legislation on the issue has yet to emerge. And the country s chief telecommunications regulatory agency, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), has been reluctant to fully classify VoIP services as either an unregulated, information service or a heavily-regulated, traditional telecommunications service. Instead, the FCC has engaged in a piecemeal approach over the past several years, imposing regulations on interconnected VoIP services, a specific flavor of VoIP service that utilizes the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN). The FCC has determined that interconnected VoIP services which enable users to place calls to and receive calls from the PSTN should be subject to many of the requirements applicable to traditional telephone services, while other forms of VoIP services (such as peer-to-peer services that do not make use of traditional telephone numbers) have been left largely unregulated. Specifically, the FCC has subjected interconnected VoIP services to regulations concerning emergency communications (E911), telecommunications relay services for hearing-impaired individuals (TRS), customer privacy (CPNI) and the facilitation of wiretaps and government surveillance (CALEA). In addition, the FCC ruled that providers of interconnected VoIP services must contribute to the Universal Service Fund (USF), a subsidy mechanism that supports the provision of telecommunications services in rural areas; to schools, libraries and rural health care facilities; and to low-income consumers. The FCC has not placed obligations on other IP-based service providers, such as those that provide instant messaging, Internet gaming and computer-to-computer voice communications services, because customers of those services cannot receive calls from and place calls to the PSTN, even though the services may contain a voice component. State regulation has remained minimal in the face of the FCC s reluctance to label interconnected VoIP as a fullblown replacement for traditional telephone services. However, some state regulators, faced with public interest issues such as shrinking Universal Service revenue, emergency services support, and consumer protection, have started to make inroads into the regulation of instate, interconnected VoIP services. The result of this has been a complicated and often times conflicting approach to the regulation of VoIP service. The new willingness by both State and Federal authorities to press forward with VoIP regulation sends a clear signal that the unregulated honeymoon is over. It is certain that VoIP regulatory compliance will continue to remain dynamic and change over time as these issues are worked out. The implications of this are monumental and may carry significant consequences for new and existing VoIP service providers. VoIP Compliance Manual iii Current as of: 8/01/2011

In an effort to assist interconnected VoIP service provider s navigation of the complex world of VoIP regulation and ensure compliance with such regulation, The CommLaw Group prepared this Interconnected VoIP Regulatory Compliance Manual. This Interconnected VoIP Regulatory Compliance Manual presents a comprehensive summary of regulatory requirements applicable to providers of interconnected VoIP services. This Manual should be used as a reference tool to understand an interconnected VoIP service provider s regulatory obligations at the federal and state level and ultimately keep VoIP service providers in compliance with all major regulations that affect the provisioning of VoIP services. This Manual does not provide a comprehensive review of the state or local taxation of VoIP services and should not be relied on for tax advice. The Manual is organized into the following Chapters: - Federal Regulation and Compliance Overview - Licensing & Registration Requirements - Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) - Communications Assistance For Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) - E911 - Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) - Universal Service Fund (USF) - International Traffic & Revenue Reporting - Local Competition and Broadband Collection Reporting (FCC Form 477) - Miscellaneous Contribution Requirements - Federal Consumer Protection Requirements - Federal Preemption Additional, in-depth information on federal, state and international regulations affecting VoIP providers may be found in the attached Appendices: - Appendix A Summary of Federal Regulatory Action - Appendix B Summary of State VoIP Legislative and Regulatory Action - Appendix C Discussion of the historical shaping of VoIP regulations - Appendix D forms and instructions - Appendix E Overview of Canadian VoIP Regulation VoIP Compliance Manual iv Current as of: 8/01/2011

1. FEDERAL REGULATIONS SUMMARY E911 Requirements Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) Technical Requirements: Interconnected VoIP providers must transmit all customer 911 calls and customer automatic number identification (ANI) to the caller s designated Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP). 911 call routing must be accomplished through ANI. The PSAP must know the caller s Registered Location. Regulatory Requirements: Customer Registered Location information must be collected from customers prior to service initiation. Customers must be notified of 911 limitations. Customer warning labels must be distributed. Providers with annual revenues equal to or greater than $138 million must file an E911 Architecture Information System Report. Interconnected VoIP providers are required to comply with CALEA. Providers must facilitate Law Enforcement Agency (LEA) wiretaps, traces and other lawful surveillance. Providers must comply with systems capability requirements set forth in CALEA Section 103. CALEA compliance may be achieved through Trusted Third Parties (TTPs). Providers must file and maintain up-to-date System Security and Integrity (SSI) Manual with the FCC. VoIP Compliance Manual 1-1 Current as of: 8/01/2011

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (CONT D) Auditing Requirements Document Retention Requirements In an August 2007 Report and Order, the FCC noted that the Office of Inspector General (OIG) was, at the time, overseeing four-hundred and sixty (460) audits on both USF contributors and beneficiaries, and that the FCC may choose to reevaluate auditing procedures once these audits have been completed. In addition to the on-going OIG audits, similar to taxpayer audits performed by the Internal Revenue Service, participants in the USF program are subject to random audits by the USF Administrator, USAC and its delegated agents. Compliance Trigger: Record retention polices for all USF contributors have been extended to five (5) years. Under the new regulations, contributors must retain all documents and records which demonstrate to auditors and/or the Enforcement Bureau that USF contributions were made in compliance with the program rules. Contributors must make available all documents and records that pertain to USF contributions, including those of contractors and consultants working on their behalf, to the FCC s OIG, to USAC, and to their agents. These documents and records include, without limitation, the following: financial statements and supporting documentation; accounting records; historical customer records; and general ledgers. Contributors should also retain any other relevant documentation used to support Form 499 revenue reporting and their determination and remittance of USF contributions. Likewise, contributors should retain similar documentation to the extent applicable to their reporting and determination of contributions and payments to other FCC Programs, such as TRS Fund, LNPA, NANPA and Regulatory Fees. VoIP Compliance Manual 6-2 Current as of: 8/01/2011

STATE LEGISLATIVE & REGULATORY MATRIX

Alabama State Contacts Public Service Commission P.O. Box 304260 100 N. Union St. Suite 992 Montgomery, AL 36103 Phone: 334 242 5218 http://psc.alabama.gov/ Regulations at a Glance Agency Contact: Mr. Doug Dillard Phone: 334 242 2819 Email: doug.dillard@psc.alabama.gov Universal Service: There is no requirement that VoIP providers register with the Alabama PSC, as the PSC does not have authority over VoIP services. Registration: There is currently no state Universal Service Fund in the state of Alabama. The Alabama Public Service Commission also does not currently have authority over VoIP services (See http://www.psc.state.al.us/telecom/webpage3.htm). TRS Contribution: There are no Alabama state TRS contribution obligations in Alabama. Additional Notes: E911: No regulations defined. Appendix B ~ AL~