IDENTIFYING AND PRIORITIZING THE FINANCING METHODS (A HYBRID APPROACH DELPHI - ANP )



Similar documents
MULTIPLE-OBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUE Analytical Hierarchy Process

Chapter 4 SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS METHODOLOGY

Aircraft Selection Using Analytic Network Process: A Case for Turkish Airlines

Vendor Evaluation and Rating Using Analytical Hierarchy Process

ERP SYSTEM SELECTION MODEL FOR LOW COST NGN PHONE COMPANY

The Application of ANP Models in the Web-Based Course Development Quality Evaluation of Landscape Design Course

Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Wicked Risk Problems

Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method to Prioritise Human Resources in Substitution Problem

An analytical network process-based framework for successful total quality management (TQM): An assessment of Turkish manufacturing industry readiness

Performance Management for Inter-organization Information Systems Performance: Using the Balanced Scorecard and the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process

Evaluating Simulation Software Alternatives through ANP

How to do AHP analysis in Excel

PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT OF INSURANCE COMPANIES BY USING BALANCED SCORECARD AND ANP

Applying the ANP Model for Selecting the Optimal Full-service Advertising Agency

An Evaluation Model for Determining Insurance Policy Using AHP and Fuzzy Logic: Case Studies of Life and Annuity Insurances

Analytical hierarchy process for evaluation of general purpose lifters in the date palm service industry

Combining ANP and TOPSIS Concepts for Evaluation the Performance of Property-Liability Insurance Companies

Supplier Performance Evaluation and Selection in the Herbal Industry

Analytical Hierarchy Process for Higher Effectiveness of Buyer Decision Process

Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary

Decision Making on Project Selection in High Education Sector Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Contractor selection using the analytic network process

ENHANCEMENT OF FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT WITH THE AID OF ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS

Factors Affecting The Development of Engineering Consulting Firms

Project Management Software Selection Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Method

Research on supply chain risk evaluation based on the core enterprise-take the pharmaceutical industry for example

A Fuzzy AHP based Multi-criteria Decision-making Model to Select a Cloud Service

A Quality Based Method to Analyze Software Architectures

THE SELECTION OF BRIDGE MATERIALS UTILIZING THE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS

THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)

USING THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) TO SELECT AND PRIORITIZE PROJECTS IN A PORTFOLIO

Analytic Hierarchy Process for Design Selection of Laminated Bamboo Chair

The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Danny Hahn

A REVIEW AND CRITIQUE OF HYBRID MADM METHODS APPLICATION IN REAL BUSINESS

Strategic Planning for the Textile and Clothing Supply Chain

Project Management Software Selection Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Method

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS AS A TOOL FOR SELECTING AND EVALUATING PROJECTS

Information Security and Risk Management

Comparative Analysis of FAHP and FTOPSIS Method for Evaluation of Different Domains

Development of Virtual Lab System through Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process

Evaluating the Critical success factors of strategic customer relationship management (SCRM) in textile industry (with Fuzzy Approach)

International Association of Scientific Innovation and Research (IASIR) (An Association Unifying the Sciences, Engineering, and Applied Research)

An Illustrated Guide to the ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS

Subcontractor Selection Using Analytic Hierarchy Process

A Hybrid Model of Data Mining and MCDM Methods for Estimating Customer Lifetime Value. Malaysia

A Proposal Framework for Evaluating Risks of Information Technology Outsourcing

ASSESSMENT OF FACTORS AFFECTING EMPOWERMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS

6 Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Identifying & Prioritizing of Electronic Commerce Factors in B2B Relationships using Fuzzy ANP (Case study: Nanotechnology High tech Organizations)

Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Method in ERP system selection process

COMPARISON OF AHP AND ANP METHODS FOR RESILIENCE MEASUREMENT IN SUPPLY CHAINS. Pavel WICHER, Radim LENORT

The objective of this course is to obtain a basic understanding of calculus the mathematical technique most frequently used in business and economics.

Green Supplier Assessment in Environmentally Responsive Supply Chains through Analytical Network Process

A Decision-Making Framework for IT Outsourcing using the Analytic Hierarchy Process

SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT AND A STUDY ON SUPPLIER SELECTION in TURKEY

The Analytic Network Process

Reproducing Calculations for the Analytical Hierarchy Process

ERP SYSTEM SELECTION BY AHP METHOD: CASE STUDY FROM TURKEY

Application of the Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods for Project Selection

Textile and Clothing Supply Chain Management: Use of Planning-Link in the Strategic Planning Process

CONTRACTOR SELECTION WITH RISK ASSESSMENT BY

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) TUTORIAL

Identification and Prioritization of Knowledge Flow Barriers Based on Organizational Knowledge Management Cycle (OKMC)

Supplier Selection through Analytical Hierarchy Process: A Case Study In Small Scale Manufacturing Organization

An Evaluation of Strategic Networking Equipments Using. AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process)

CASE STUDIES OF USING THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS METHOD IN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MANAGEMENT

Evaluation of educational open-source software using multicriteria decision analysis methods

The Most Effective Strategy to Improve Customer Satisfaction in Iranian Banks: A Fuzzy AHP Analysis

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2014, 6(3): Research Article. Analysis of results of CET 4 & CET 6 Based on AHP

European Scientific Journal October 2015 edition vol.11, No.28 ISSN: (Print) e - ISSN

APPLICATION OF ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS METHOD IN THE EVALUATION OF MANAGERS OF INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES IN SLOVAKIA

INVOLVING STAKEHOLDERS IN THE SELECTION OF A PROJECT AND PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT TOOL

Klaus D. Goepel No 10 Changi Business Park Central 2 Hansapoint@CBP #06-01/08 Singapore drklaus@bpmsg.com ABSTRACT

Expert Systems with Applications

Analytic Hierarchy Process for Effective Decision Making in Project Management. Glenn Hamamura Dr. Lawrence Rowland

Proposing an approach for evaluating e-learning by integrating critical success factor and fuzzy AHP

The Analytic Hierarchy Process and SDSS

Use Analytic Hierarchy Process For Project Selection

QoS EVALUATION OF CLOUD SERVICE ARCHITECTURE BASED ON ANP

DEVELOPING A STRATEGIC PLAN OF EASTERN ALBORZ COAL COMPANY USING SWOT METHOD

CHAPTER 3 IDENTIFICATION OF MOST PREFERRED KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR IN INDIAN CALL CENTRES

A new Environmental Performance Index using analytic hierarchy process: A case of ASEAN countries

Negative Risk. Risk Can Be Positive. The Importance of Project Risk Management

Assessing Project Time Management of the Contractors with Using ANP

Report on SELECTING THE BEST PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD USING THE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)

Content-Based Discovery of Twitter Influencers

Department of Business Management, Islamic Azad University, Iran

Design of Customer-Oriented Cloud Products

OPTIMIZATION STRATEGY OF CLOUD COMPUTING SERVICE COMPOSITION RESEARCH BASED ON ANP

Entrepreneurs of Small Scale Sector: A Factor Analytical Study of Business Obstacles

Using Primavera Software in Resource Allocation and Project Evaluation of Construction Projects

Transcription:

IDENTIFYING AND PRIORITIZING THE FINANCING METHODS (A HYBRID APPROACH DELPHI - ANP ) Pezhman Arzhang 1, Naser Hamidi 2 1 MSc.Business Administration, Department of Business Management, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran 2 Associate Prof.Faculty member Islamic Azad University of Qazvin, Department of Industrial Management, Qazvin, Iran Abstract Financing is a major challenge for businesses today face. Financing and investment are important factors of development.access to finance is a major obstacle to economic actors. The purpose of this study is to identifying and prioritizing the financing method. In this study of 18 experts in the field of financing is used.we use the Delphi method to identify the important financing methods.the Delphi method is a structured communication technique, originally developed as a systematic, interactive forecasting method which relies on a panel of experts.the important financing methods that have been identified include : foreign direct investment (FDI), foreign indirect investment (IFI), forfaiting, factoring, finance, loan, usance and guarantee. Finaly this methods were ranked by the method of ANP.The analytic network process (ANP) is a generalization of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and can be used to treat more sophisticated decision problems.as a result, the foreign indirect investment (IFI) method won first rank. Keywords: Financing methods, Delphi, ANP 1.Introduction Understanding variables that affect the success or failure of growth are important, especially at the firm level. One variable that fundamentally affects how firms expand domestically and internationally is financing since it affects both the acquisition of resources and business operations [11]. Financing and investment are important factors of development.access to finance is a major obstacle to economic actors [14].One of the major problems of limited access to external finance companies, Especially companies in exporting to different countries is [8].In economic activity and trade finance, working capital is used. Payment and financing through grants, direct investment, indirect, shopping, civic participation and loan...possible [14].One of the major sources of corporate finance short-term loans that commercial banks are. Although there are several sources of funding, No one can replace commercial loans, and industrial loans as a credit in the current account Most of the companies are being[5].although banks under government control and only after the liberation, only a handful of private banks were established, Extensive network of financial institutions to conduct affairs there [1].Finance industry through new financing methods, the need for financial investors is providing[7].financed through investment in two ways, direct and indirect investments are 110

made. The case of direct investment is joint venture and indirect investment is buy back. Financing for economic activity, import, export, production and service requirements [14].The purpose of this study is to identifying and prioritizing the financing methods in Iran. As the purpose of this study, the following research questions are posed : RQ 1. What are the important methods in financing? RQ 2. What is to prioritize these methods? 2.Literature review Carbo, Rodrı guez, and Udell (2008) argue that the issue of bank competition and credit availability may matter most to SMEs for two reasons. First, SMEs are more vulnerable to information problems. Second, SMEs are much more bank-dependent than large enterprises study of a large number of Spanish SMEs suggests that constrained firms with restricted access to the bank loan market may turn to the trade credit market to exploit their investment opportunities, while unconstrained firms would turn to the bank loan market. Additionally, they analyse the supply side of the trade credit market by testing whether the extension of trade credit is sensitive to bank lending. They find that there is a significant sensitivity of the extension of trade credit to bank lending for unconstrained firms, thereby, suggesting that these financially unconstrained firms may act as lenders due to their easier access to a less costly source of funding [12].In other studies it was found that the growth opportunities, tax shield and internal resources influence the capital structure of small and medium enterprises are. Moreover, the empirical evidence obtained confirms that small and medium enterprises are clearly different behavior than large firms exert,these firms often have concerns about their finances [3].Two new methods of financing mechanisms to finance the forfaiting and factoring applicable throughout the world [7].Some studies show that less access to credit and lack of competitiveness of banks in order to finance Create constraints for small and medium enterprises in the field of finance [13]. 3. Methodology In this study using the Delphi method and interaction with experts, important methods were identified. Finaly this methods were ranked by the method of ANP. ANP Delphi Financing methods Identifying the important methods Prioritizing the methods Fig. 1. Model procedure of the current research. 111

3.1.Delphi method The Delphi method is a structured communication technique, originally developed as a systematic, interactive forecasting method which relies on a panel of experts[2].the experts answer questionnaires in two or more rounds. After each round, a facilitator provides an anonymous summary of the experts forecasts from the previous round as well as the reasons they provided for their judgments. Thus, experts are encouraged to revise their earlier answers in light of the replies of other members of their panel. It is believed that during this process the range of the answers will decrease and the group will converge towards the "correct" answer. Finally, the process is stopped after a pre-defined stop criterion (e.g. number of rounds, achievement of consensus, stability of results) and the mean or median scores of the final rounds determine the results [9].Delphi is based on the principle that forecasts (or decisions) from a structured group of individuals are more accurate than those from unstructured groups[10]. 3.2. Analytic Network Process (ANP) The analytic network process (ANP) is a generalization of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and can be used to treat more sophisticated decision problems[4].saaty (1996) proposed using the Analytic Network Process (ANP), which relaxes the hierarchical structure restriction. However, two questions related to the ANP model warrant attention: how to generate the influential network relationship and how to evaluate the degree of influence [6].The basic ANP consists of the networks of influence that contain the factors of the problem and the logical groupings of these factors into clusters. Each decision network is composed of clusters, their elements, and links between the elements. A link between an element (the parent ) and the elements it connects to in a given cluster (its children ) makes up the usual AHP pairwise comparison set. The depen- dencies and, feedback, among clusters, and dependencies in the system are expressed through these links. Links between elements within the same cluster are called inner dependencies, whereas links between a parent element in one cluster and its children in another cluster are called outer dependencies. If there are outer dependencies between two clusters in both directions, this relation is called as feedback. Inner and outer dependencies are the best way decision- makers can capture and represent the concepts of influencing or being influenced, between clusters and between elements with respect to a specific element. Pairwise comparisons are made systematically for all combinations using the fundamental comparison scale (1 9) of AHP that is used to indicate how many times an element dominates another. The decision-maker can express relative dominance between each pair of elements verbally as equally important, moderately more important, strongly more important, very strongly more important, and extremely more important. These descriptive judgments would then be translated into numerical values1,3,5,7,9 respectively with 2,4,6, and 8 as intermediate values for comparisons between two successive points. Reciprocals of these values are used for the corresponding transpose judgments. In making judgments, the decision-maker can incorporate experience,knowledge and hard data. Tangibles can be included in the model alongside intangibles. After the pairwise comparisons are completed,the results aresynthesized. Step 1. (Model Construction): Determine all the elements that affect the decision and group them into clusters for the network. Step 2. (Formulating the links and performing paired comparisons between the clusters/elements): In the network, formulate the links between the elements and perform the following paired comparisons to derive eigenvectors and to form a supermatrix. 112

Step 3. (Constructing the Supermatrix): The outcome of the process above is the unweighted supermatrix. Its columns contain the priorities derived from the pairwise comparisons of the elements. An unweighted supermatrix may not be column stochastic. To obtain a stochastic matrix, i.e., each column sums to one, multiply the blocks of the unweighted supermatrix by the corresponding cluster priority. Stochastic matrix obtained is called as weighted supermatrix. Raise the weighted supermatrix to a large power to capture first, second, and higher degree influences. When the differences between corresponding elements of a row are less than a very small number, for successive powers of the supermatrix, the process has converged. The output is limit matrix from where priorities can be read [4]. 4. Results The results of Delphi method is shown in Table 1. Table 1: Important methods Symbols C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 Methods Forfaiting Factoring Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Finance Loan Foreign Indirect Investment (IFI) Usance Guarantee The unweighted supermatrix is shown in Table 2. Table 2: Unweighted supermatrix C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C1 0.0000 0.1282 0.1162 0.1162 0.0769 0.0967 0.0810 0.0909 C2 0.1428 0.0000 0.1162 0.1162 0.1282 0.0967 0.1891 0.1515 C3 0.0857 0.1282 0.0000 0.1627 0.1794 0.2258 0.0810 0.0909 C4 0.0857 0.1794 0.1627 0.0000 0.0769 0.0967 0.1351 0.2727 C5 0.1428 0.2307 0.2093 0.2093 0.0000 0.0967 0.1891 0.0909 C6 0.2000 0.1282 0.1162 0.1162 0.1282 0.0000 0.1351 0.1515 C7 0.2571 0.0769 0.1162 0.1162 0.1794 0.1612 0.0000 0.1515 C8 0.0857 0.1282 0.1627 0.1627 0.2307 0.2258 0.1891 0.0000 113

The weighted supermatrix is shown in Table 3. Table 3:Weighted supermatrix C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C1 0.0000 0.1282 0.1162 0.1162 0.0769 0.0967 0.0810 0.0909 C2 0.1428 0.0000 0.1162 0.1162 0.1282 0.0967 0.1891 0.1515 C3 0.0857 0.1282 0.0000 0.1627 0.1794 0.2258 0.0810 0.0909 C4 0.0857 0.1794 0.1627 0.0000 0.0769 0.0967 0.1351 0.2727 C5 0.1428 0.2307 0.2093 0.2093 0.0000 0.0967 0.1891 0.0909 C6 0.2000 0.1282 0.1162 0.1162 0.1282 0.0000 0.1351 0.1515 C7 0.2571 0.0769 0.1162 0.1162 0.1794 0.1612 0.0000 0.1515 C8 0.0857 0.1282 0.1627 0.1627 0.2307 0.2258 0.1891 0.0000 The limit matrix is shown in Table 4. Table 4: Limit matrix C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C1 0.0908 0.0908 0.0908 0.0908 0.0908 0.0908 0.0908 0.0908 C2 0.1188 0.1188 0.1188 0.1188 0.1188 0.1188 0.1188 0.1188 C3 0.1207 0.1207 0.1207 0.1207 0.1207 0.1207 0.1207 0.1207 C4 0.1292 0.1292 0.1292 0.1292 0.1292 0.1292 0.1292 0.1292 C5 0.1423 0.1423 0.1423 0.1423 0.1423 0.1423 0.1423 0.1423 C6 0.1206 0.1206 0.1206 0.1206 0.1206 0.1206 0.1206 0.1206 C7 0.1290 0.1290 0.1290 0.1290 0.1290 0.1290 0.1290 0.1290 C8 0.1482 0.1482 0.1482 0.1482 0.1482 0.1482 0.1482 0.1482 The final prioritization of ANP method is shown in Table 5. Table 5: The final prioritization Rank Methods 1 Foreign Indirect Investment (IFI) 2 Loan 3 Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) 4 Finance 5 Guarantee 6 Usance 114

7 Factoring 8 Forfaiting 5. Conclusions The most important problem for businesses, is its lack of adequate access to finance. Financing and investment are important factors of development.access to finance is a major obstacle to economic actors. The purpose of this study, identifying and prioritizing the financing methods in Iran. In this study,we use the Delphi method to identify the important financing methods.the Delphi method is a structured communication technique, originally developed as a systematic, interactive forecasting method which relies on a panel of experts. The results of Delphi method is shown in Table 1.Finaly this methods were ranked by the method of ANP.The analytic network process (ANP) is a generalization of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and can be used to treat more sophisticated decision problems.the final prioritization of ANP method is shown in Table 5. According to the survey results suggest : 1. Develop a strategy for attracting foreign investment. 2. In subsequent studies used more financing methods. References [1]Akhavi, A.(2010).Strengthening SMEs Competitiveness in a Globalization Era.Tehran:The Institute for Trade Studies & Research. [2] Dalkey,Norman. Helmer, Olaf. (1963). An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3),pp.458-467. [3] Gracia,L.,& Mira, F. (2008).Testing trade-off and pecking order theories financing SMEs. Small Business Economics, 31,pp.117-136. [4] Karpak,B.,Topcu,I.(2010). Small medium manufacturing enterprises in Turkey: An analytic network process framework for prioritizing factors affecting success, Int. J. Production Economics,125,pp. 60-70. [5] Neveu,P.N.(2007). Fundamentals of Managerial Finance.Tehran:Samt. [6] Liou,J.J.,Tzeng,H,G.(2012).COMMENTS ON MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING (MCDM) METHODS IN ECONOMICS: AN OVERVIEW, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18(4),pp. 672-695. [7] Parvizian,K.,& Azarakhsh,N.(2010). The development of new tools to finance exports. Export Development,83,pp.24-27. 115

[8] Riding, A., Orser, B., Spence, M.,& Belanger, B.(2012). Financing new venture exporters. Small Business Economics, 38(2),pp.147-163. [9] Rowe, Gene. Wright, George. (1999).The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(4),pp. 353-375. [10] Rowe, Gene. Wright, George. (2001). Expert Opinions in Forecasting. Role of the Delphi Technique. Boston, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers. [11] Smolarski, J.,& Kut,C.(2011).The impact of venture capital financing method on SME performance and internationalization, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7,pp.39-55. [12] Thampy,A(2010). Financing of SME firms in India Interview with Ranjana Kumar, Former CMD, Indian Bank;Vigilance Commissioner, Central Vigilance Commission, IIMB Management Review,22,pp.93-101. [13] Valverde, S., Fernandez, F.,& Udell, G.(2009).Bank Market Power and SME Financing Constraints. Review of Finance,13,pp.309-340. [14] Zeynalzade, A.(2011). Finance,Import,Export,Projects. Tehran:The Institute for Trade Studies & Research. 116