Marcellus Fast Facts



Similar documents
Shale Energy Fluids Management Practices

Shale Energy Produced Fluids Management and UIC Well Disposal Trends

Christopher Harto Argonne National Laboratory

Zero Discharge Water Management for. Horizontal Shale Gas Well Development

Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation

Reclamation of Marcellus Shale Drilling Sites in West Virginia by Jeff Skousen and Paul Ziemkiewicz West Virginia University

Oil & Natural Gas Technology

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2012 SCORING GUIDELINES

Total Water & Wastewater Management for Shale Gas Production. Treatment and Operation Solutions

Penn State Cooperative Extension

TREATMENT OF PHOSPHATE FERTILIZER PLANT WASTE WATER IN FLORIDA FOR DISCHARGE AND RE USE PURPOSES

Natural Gas Supply/Demand - Challenges and Opportunities

ROSS Technology Removal of Oil, Solids and Scale Formers

GE Power & Water Water & Process Technologies. Water Treatment Solutions for Unconventional Gas

January 2014: Jeanne Briskin of the U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Produced water from oil and gas production

INFORMATION SHEET ORDER NO. R XXXX TRIANGLE ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. FLORIN ROAD AGGREGATE PLANT SACRAMENTO COUNTY

David Alleman, ALL Consulting Bill Hochheiser, ALL Consulting. NETL Project Kick-off Meeting January 7, 2010

A History and Overview of the Barnett Shale

SPE Distinguished Lecturer Program

EPRI Global Climate Change Research Seminar. Natural Gas Supply. Francis O Sullivan, Ph.D. May 25 th, 2011

How To Water System

Contaminant Characterization of. Treatment Inc., Josephine Facility: Implications for Disposal of Oil and Gas

Recommended Practices Associated with Hydraulic Fracturing Operations

In Fracking s Wake: New Rules are Needed to Protect Our Health and Environment from Contaminated Wastewater

Navigating Coal Retirements Amid Emissions Regulations and Natural Gas Deliverability Concerns Perspective from a Supplier

Issues & Trends in Natural Gas Supply & Production. June 30, 2011 Washington, DC

Underground Injection Wells For Produced Water Disposal

Nutrient Reduction by Use of Industrial Deep Injection Wells, Miami-Dade County, Florida

Ion Exchange Softening

Chapter 1 Introduction

Life After Getting a BS and MS Degree Working as a Professional in PA

Hardness Comparisons

Dewatering - Time and Cost Relief by way of Trenchless Construction

Appendix B: Water Treatment Scenarios from AMD Treat

Nine Industrial Scale V SEPs. Feed Tank V SEP. Feed Pumps (Three) Concentrate. Tank. V SEP Treatment System

5. Environmental Analysis

Well Site Spill Protection: Impacts, Trends and Technologies for Preventing Releases to Water Sources

Hardness ions also interfere with many chemical processes such as chemical compounding and aqueous cleaners.

Acid Mine Water Remediation a case study

BASELINE WATER QUALITY SAMPLING IN SHALE GAS EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION AREAS

Reuse of Alternative Water Sources for Cooling Tower Systems Two Case Studies Using Non-Traditional Water Sources

CHECKLIST FOR FILING AN APPLICATION FOR A GROUND AND/OR SURFACE WATER WITHDRAWAL PROJECT IN THE DELAWARE RIVER BASIN

Neutralization of Acid Mine Drainage Using Stabilized Flue Gas Desulfurization Material

Hardness - Multivalent metal ions which will form precipitates with soaps. e.g. Ca 2+ + (soap) Ca(soap) 2 (s)

WISCONSIN WASTEWATER OPERATORS ASSOCIATION

Frack Truck Impacts On New York Villages and Towns

Alberta Research Council (ARC) Enhanced Coalbed Methane (ECBM) Recovery Project in Alberta, Canada

THESIS GIS BASED LOCATION OPTIMIZATION FOR MOBILE PRODUCED WATER TREATMENT FACILITIES IN SHALE GAS OPERATIONS. Submitted by. Amol Hanmant Kitwadkar

Measuring the Benefit of a State of the Art Water Treatment Facility to the Monongahela Basin

Unconventional Oil and Gas Production Drives Trends in Water Management and Treatment

Our Environmental Protection Plan RECYCLING CAPABILITIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS

MANAGEMENT OF PRODUCED WATER FROM OIL AND GAS WELLS

Life Cycle Assessment of Three Water Scenarios: Importation, Reclamation, and Desalination

Removing Thallium from Industrial FGD Scrubber Water with Sorbster Adsorbent Media

Water remediation: Passive Treatment Technologies

Tuesday, March 17, 2015 Houston, TX. Energy Exchange 9:20 9:50 a.m. and 9:55 10:25 a.m. OIL AND GAS: ENVIRONMENTAL INSURANCE IS IT NECESSARY?

Produced Water Volumes and Management Practices Page 3

Shale gas and tight oil: Framing the opportunities and risks

Water Softening for Hardness Removal. Hardness in Water. Methods of Removing Hardness 5/1/15. WTRG18 Water Softening and Hardness

1. Inspection and monitoring... 3

Feasibility study of crystallization process for water softening in a pellet reactor

Mine Water Treatment Solutions for Discharge and Re-Use

Oil and Gas Extraction and Source Water Protection

In-Situ Bioremediation Demonstration of Coal-Based Acid Mine Drainage. Tide Mine Site Indiana County, Pennsylvania

On the Impact of Oil Extraction in North Orange County: Overview of Hydraulic Fracturing

Secondary Containment: Regulations & BMPs. Beth Powell Vice-President and General Manager New Pig Energy bethp@newpigenergy.com

Removing Heavy Metals from Wastewater

FRACTURING FLOWBACK: CONTROLS, ANALYSIS & BENEFITS

CENTRAL ARIZONA SALINITY STUDY ---- Phase I. Technical Appendix O. Municipal TDS Research

Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Oil and gas exploration and production... 22a-472-1

Residuals Management Somersworth Drinking Water Treatment Facility. Ian Rohrbacher, Treatment Operator IV

Florida Department of Environmental Protection

FACT SHEET STATEMENT OF BASIS HARLEY DOME 1 PRODUCED WATER TREATMENT FACILITY UPDES PERMIT NUMBER: UT NEW PERMIT MINOR INDUSTRIAL

Life cycle energy analysis of water use system in Ara river watershed

Pre-Treatment Water Quality in the Aaron Run Watershed

Maricopa Association of Governments. Technical Memorandum No. 1 INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT COSTS. August 2001

«Shale gas exploration: Water related issues»

Impact Assessment of Natural Gas Production in the New York City Water Supply Watershed. Final Impact Assessment Report

PENNSYLVANIA QUICK FACTS

Energy Audits Waste Water Treatment Plants

Wasser Berlin International GWP Forum: Challenges in North America. Alberta s Water Challenges and Opportunities

Engineered Media for Removal of Fission Products from Aqueous Streams Abigail Holmquist, UOP - A Honeywell Company

GEOTHERMAL POTENTIAL OF ABANDONED UNDERGROUND MINES IN OHIO

Treatment options for hydrogen sulfide. Testing for hydrogen sulfide

Description of the Water Conserv II Facility

How Energy Choices Affect Fresh Water Supplies: A Comparison of U.S. Coal and Natural Gas

DOCKET NO. D CP-2 DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

Sunday Times review of DEP drilling records reveals water damage, murky testing methods

USEPA Hydraulic Fracturing Study Water Management Workshop

Drill-Right. best Oil & Gas Development Practices for Texas

A pound of coal supplies enough electricity to power ten 100-watt light bulbs for about an hour.

Elin Betanzo WRRM Annual Meeting April 6, 2016

Total Suspended Solids Total Dissolved Solids Hardness

Background. 179 million gallons saved for make-up water

2006 Standard Application Processing Time. 10 months. 14 months

Case Study: Optimizing Scale Inhibition Costs in Reverse Osmosis Desalination Plants

Shale Gas: Energy and Environmental Issues

James City Service Authority Five Forks Water Treatment Facility

March 2015 MEGATRENDS IN THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY

Transcription:

1

Marcellus Fast Facts Covers about 95,000 square miles in 6 states Occurs at depths of up to 9,000 feet Thickness of 250 feet or more Largest natural gas reservoir in North America (est. 500 TCF recoverable gas w/>1 TCF produced to date) Sufficient reserves to satisfy US demand for 20+ years Natural gas is the cleanest burning fossil fuel ~45% less CO2 emissions than coal and ~30% less than oil, Minimal SOx/NOx/particulates No mercury

Bakken

Well Drilling Locations

Well Site in Operation

Approved Consumptive Water Use in Susquehanna River Basin 8-10 mgd* PerFish SRBC Aug. 2010 *Estimated based on recent SRBC/DEP data Source: Pa andpresentation, Boat Commission

Water Use Data in Susquehanna Basin Total water use: 1.605 billion gallons on 553 wells (6/08 to 3/11) 562 mgal from public water supply (35%) 41 public sources permitted 1.043 bgal from surface water sites (65%) >130 surface water sources permitted Average total volume of fluid used per well: 4.2 million gallons per well 3.8 million gallons of fresh water (90%) 0.4 million gallons of reused flowback (10%) 30-day avg. recovery of flowback: 8% Total amount of flowback: 117 million gallons (6/08 to 3/11) Reuse 75 million gallons Disposal 42 million gallons 64% flowback reuse

Water Supply Management Number of factors to consider: Access to water near the drilling project area (public vs. self supply) Transport to well site: piping vs. trucking Availability-seasonal or perennial Will pass-by flows be required? Water quality Permitting complexity Storage

Hydraulic Fracturing Process -Each well uses about 3 to 7 million gallons of water -Approximately 8-10% of the fluids return as flowback water Source: Chesapeake Energy

Flowback Water Quality Trends

Flowback Water Management Options Flowback management options Direct reuse (blending) On-site treatment w/reuse Off-site treatment w/reuse Off-site treatment and disposal Chemical precipitation, evaporation, filtration technologies being utilized Approximately two-thirds of flowback being recycled New treatment standards for new or expanding treatment facilities TDS-500 mg/l Chlorides-250 mg/l Barium and Strontium-10 mg/l Only 1 plant in PA meet standards 4 recycling plants with ~2.1 mgd capacity-3 have zero discharge

Typical Flowback Scaling Agent Concentrations Cation Barium: Strontium: Calcium: Magnesium: Manganese: Iron: Concentration 2,000-5,000 mg/l 1,000-7,000 mg/l 10,000-25,000 mg/l 500-1,000 mg/l 2-10 mg/l 20-200 mg/l These concentrations need to be reduced to minimize the potential for downhole scaling and plugging.

Typical Treatment Scheme for Reuse Chemical precipitation can have >99% removal efficiency for potential scaling agents Can generate several tons of sludge per 100,000 gallons treated

Flowback Treatment Specifications Example industry flowback treatment levels for recycling purposes: Total cations in the <10 to <2,000 ppm range Acceptable levels range from company to company Primary focus on Ba and Sr, but Ca also a concern Ba, Sr, Fe, Mn, Mg < 10 ppm Ca <1,000 ppm Hardness <2,500 Processed water sulfates levels <30 ppm TSS <30 ppm TDS is variable, >50,000 ppm can be acceptable

Emerging Water Management Trends Use of alternative water sources Groundwater supply wells closer to drilling Municipal wastewater use (2 plants in permitting process) Acid mine drainage Flowback recycling Estimated three-fold increase in last 2 years Expected to increase as grandfathered facilities phased out On-site treatment technologies Evaporation Filtration Chemical precipitation Closed loop drilling and fluids storage Lined well pads to minimize releases Regulatory monitoring down stream from discharges Investigation of underground injection wells for disposal

Approximate location of permitted recycling facility

Your Contact in Germany Austria Switzerland Stefan Peikert Director Investment Germany Austria & Switzerland Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Office of International Business Development Department of Community & Economic Development Authorized Trade & Investment Representative AHP Group Berlin - Münster - Heidelberg - Leipzig Berlin +49 (0)30 7568754-12 Mobile +49 (0)171 3032576 Fax +49 (0)30 7568754-44 peikert@newpa.de / www.newpa.de 19