ADMINISTRATION & BENEFITS

Similar documents
Tier. Plan. for members participating prior to September 1, 2008

Group hospital and medical insurance and managed care plan coverage -- Employee and employer contributions -- Minimum service requirements.

age sixty-five (65) or at least sixty (60) months of service if under age sixty-five

West Virginia Department of Public Safety Death, Disability and Retirement Fund (Plan A)

Summary Plan Description for Active Membership

COUNTY EMPLOYEES' ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF COOK COUNTY ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF DECEMBER 31,2011

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2015

Report on the Actuarial Valuation of the Health Insurance Credit Program

Choosing Your Retirement Plan Optional Retirement Plan for Higher Education VRS Hybrid Retirement Plan Membership Date: On or after January 1, 2014

What Small Employers (and their Boards) Need to Know About IMRF

Kentucky Retirement Systems Health Benefits. Mike Burnside, Executive Director National Conference of State Legislators July 28, 2010

Report on the Actuarial Valuation of the Group Life Insurance Program

Report of the Actuary on the Annual Valuation of the Retirement System for Employees of the City of Cincinnati. Pension Report

Pension Sustainability Consensus Proposal Presentation to Task Force

YORK UNIVERSITY PENSION PLAN

GEORGIA CODE PROVISIONS PUBLIC RETIREMENT SYSTEMS INDEX

TEACHERS AND STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM. your retirement benefits

Handbook for Members Virginia Retirement System

Employees Retirement System (ERS) Old Plan, New Plan, GSEPS Plan Guide E RSGA. Employees Retirement System of Georgia. Serving those who serve Georgia

South Dakota Retirement System. Actuarial Valuation As of June 30, 2014

FUNDING NEW JERSEY PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEMS

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS DEFERRED RETIREMENT OPTION PLAN (DROP) (REVISED MAY 2015)

Cavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS DEFERRED RETIREMENT OPTION PLAN (DROP) (REVISED AUGUST 2012)

Choosing a Retirement Program

TEACHERS AND STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM. your retirement benefits

How To Get A Retirement Plan In Wisconsin Retirement System

Policy Brief June 2010

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN Notes to Basic Financial Statements December 31, 2014

COMPLIANCE AUDIT. Lansdowne Borough Police Pension Plan Delaware County, Pennsylvania For the Period January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014

Cavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve

District of Columbia Teachers Retirement Plan Summary Plan Description 2007

VI The Defined Benefit Member (Tiers I and II)

Analysis of PERS Cost Allocation, Benefit Modification, and System Financing Concepts February 14, 2013

1999 Academic Pension Plan

JUNE 30, 2013 POST RETIREMENT BENEFITS ANALYSIS OF THE TOWN OF SMITHFIELD

Your Pension Benefits from The City of Atlanta and The Atlanta Board of Education

NORTH STAR SCHOOL GASB 68 Notes to the Financial Statements For the Year Ended June 30, The employer s proportionate share associated with TRS

Request to Remain in the CORP. Return to Work after Retirement

TEACHERS RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION A MINNESOTA PUBLIC PENSION FUND

Financial Audit Division Office of the Legislative Auditor State of Minnesota

Teachers Retirement Association. Marriage Dissolution: Dividing TRA Benefits

Generic Local School District, Ohio Notes to the Basic Financial Statements For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015

Teachers and State Employees Retirement System (TSERS)

A Guide to Your CalPERS. Service Credit Purchase Options

GEORGIA STATE EMPLOYEES POST-EMPLOYMENT HEALTH BENEFIT FUND & GEORGIA SCHOOL PERSONNEL POST-EMPLOYMENT

Your Retirement Plan

Cavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve

FY10 Illinois Pension Reform Proposals SURS Implications Fact Sheet 5/22/09

v02979gl.doc PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF NEW JERSEY FORTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ACTUARY PREPARED AS OF JULY 1, 2002

CRITICAL PLAN ELEMENTS. Public Employees Contributory Retirement Systems of Massachusetts. Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 32

LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM FOR LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS. your retirement benefits

District of Columbia Teachers Retirement Plan

How To Get A Pension From The Pension Fund

State Government Retiree Health Benefits: Current Status and Potential Impact of New Accounting Standards

Understanding Montana's Public Employee Retirement Plans

FLORIDA RETIREMENT SYSTEM PENSION PLAN

The Public Employees Retirement System or The Alternate Benefit Program

Purchasing. Service Credit. Defined Benefit Plan. For members enrolled in the

Benefits Payable upon Death

Members Guide to: Survivor Benefits

FORCES NON-PUBLIC FUNDS EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN

Attention: Michelle Schulz, Finance Director. The date of the valuation was December 31, The purpose of the actuarial valuation is to:

SUMMARY OF THE CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PENSIONS

Utah State Retirement Systems Overview. September 9, 2009 Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

MUNICIPAL PENSION PLAN FUNDING POLICY

State of Connecticut. Teachers Retirement System

Income for your. Retirement

How To Get A Pension From The Ersri

Summary Plan Description

TRADITIONAL PLAN MEMBER GUIDE S U R S STATE UNIVERSITIES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

NC General Statutes - Chapter 135 1

MINNEAPOLIS EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND JANUARY 2004 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA MINNEAPOLIS EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT FUND (612)

The Provincial Judges and Masters in Chambers Registered and Unregistered Pension Plans. Members Handbook

Florida Retirement System Pension Plan D R O P. Deferred Retirement Option Program

RHODE ISLAND STATE EMPLOYEES AND ELECTING TEACHERS OPEB

House Committee on Pensions

Plan Comparison Guide

Delaware Public Employees Retirement System State Employees Pension Plan. Retirement Planning. Presented by the State of Delaware Office of Pensions

ANN ARBOR CITY NOTICE

CRS Report for Congress

PRESENT LAW AND BACKGROUND RELATING TO EMPLOYER-SPONSORED DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS AND THE PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION ( PBGC )

CITY OF GROSSE POINTS FARMS SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 386 ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND RESTATE THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF GROSSE POINTE FARMS

Understanding DROP. Deferred Retirement Option Program. Overview

How To Get A Pension In Canada

Transcription:

OVERVIEW OF THE KENTUCKY RETIREMENT SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION & BENEFITS Background Most Kentucky public employees are provided retirement coverage through one of six state administered retirement systems. These systems are defined benefit plans, which provide lifetime retirement benefits for the employee based upon a formula established by state statute that does not vary with the level of contributions, investment performance, and other relevant factors. This differs from a defined contribution plan, like a 401(k), where the retirement benefits the employee will receive is based upon the account balance accumulated at retirement and does vary based upon the contributions, investment performance, the employee s life span, and other relevant factors. These state-administered retirement systems, along with Social Security benefits (if applicable), and other sources of retirement income (such as other retirement accounts and post-retirement employment) serve as the basis for providing income to Kentucky public employees during their retirement years. Note: Teachers participating in the Kentucky Teachers Retirement System and some local government employees do not participate in Social Security. State employees, teachers, as well as many local government employees, are eligible to participate in voluntary defined contribution plans offered by the state through the Kentucky Public Employees Deferred Compensation Authority, which includes a 401(k) plan and a 457 plan. What Is Kentucky Retirement System (KRS)? State employees and many local government employees generally participate in one of the three following retirement systems: Kentucky Employees Retirement System (KERS). This system was established July 1, 1956 and its membership includes employees of state government, non-teaching staff at regional state supported universities (i.e. Eastern Kentucky University), and employees of local health departments, regional mental health/mental retardation agencies, and other quasi-state agencies. KERS includes both non-hazardous and hazardous duty benefits and contribution structures. KERS is governed by Kentucky Revised Statute 61.510 to 61.705 and Title 105 of the Kentucky Administrative Regulations. County Employees Retirement System (CERS). This system was established July 1, 1958 and its membership includes employees of city and county governments, police and firefighters, non-teaching staff of local boards of education, circuit clerks, local library employees, and other local government agency employees. CERS includes both nonhazardous and hazardous duty benefits and contribution structures. CERS is governed by Kentucky Revised Statute 78.510 to 78.852 and Title 105 of the Kentucky Administrative Regulations. State Police Retirement System (SPRS). This system was established July 1, 1958 and its membership includes all uniformed state police officers. SPRS is governed by Kentucky Revised Statute 16.505 to 16.652 and Title 105 of the Kentucky Administrative Regulations. These three systems are administered under one administrative agency known as the Kentucky Retirement Systems (KRS). In addition to administering pension benefits, KRS is also responsible for the administration of retiree health benefits for members of these systems as well as disability and death benefits. Note: The other state-administered pension plans include the Kentucky Teachers Retirement System (KTRS), the Judicial Retirement Plan (JRP), and the Legislators Retirement Plan (LRP). JRP and LRP are administered under one administrative agency known as the Judicial Form Retirement System (JFRS). These systems also administer retiree health benefits and disability/death benefits for their members. Who Administers KRS? As provided by statute, a nine-member board of trustees oversees the administration of KRS with five trustees being elected by the membership, three being appointed by the Governor, and one being the Secretary of the Personnel Cabinet. The five elected trustees are comprised of two trustees elected by the KERS membership, two elected by the CERS membership, and one elected by the SPRS membership. Of the three members appointed by the Governor, two must have at least 10 years of investment experience as defined by statute and one must be knowledgeable about the 1

impact of pensions on local governments. Elected and appointed trustees serve for four-year terms and may serve no more than three consecutive terms 1. The board annually elects a chair and vice-chair and the chair appoints members to various committees of the board including the investment committee, retiree health plan committee, disability appeals/administrative appeals committee, legislative & budget committee, human resources committee, and the audit committee. The current composition of the board is provided below. The board appoints an Executive Director to oversee day to day operations and to staff the needs of the systems. The current interim Executive Director is Bill Thielen and as of June 30, 2011, KRS consisted of 248 employees 2. Current KRS Board of Trustees Thomas Elliott, Chair Governor Appointee Tim Longmeyer Secretary of the Personnel Cabinet Vince Lang CERS elected trustee Dr. Daniel Bauer, Vice-Chair Governor Appointee Bobby Henson KERS elected trustee Vacant 3 CERS elected trustee Jennifer Elliott Governor Appointee Susan Smith KERS elected trustee Randy Overstreet SPRS elected trustee Who Participates in KRS? As of June 30, 2011, 379 agencies participated in KERS and 1,402 agencies participated in CERS 4. For both KERS and CERS, state statute defines the types of agencies that are eligible for participation with final approval in the process being granted or denied by the KRS board. In the case of KERS, an Executive Order declaring the agency eligible for participation is required while CERS agencies must meet statutory definitions in order to participate (the board determines if the agency meets the definition). Once an agency begins participating, all regular full-time employees hired after the agency s participation date are required to contribute to the systems. For KERS and CERS, regular full-time means an employee who average 100 hours of work per month over a calendar or fiscal year, except that school board employees are required to average 80 hours per month over the months represented by the days worked 5. All regular full-time state police officers participate in SPRS. The number of employees (often referred to as active members), former employees with accounts but not retired (often referred to as inactive members), and retired members by system is provided in the table below. System # of Active Members # of Inactive Members Retired Members Total KERS Non-Hazardous 46,617 38,597 38,597 123,811 KERS Hazardous 4,291 3,264 3,064 10,619 CERS Non-Hazardous 85,285 65,914 43,211 194,410 CERS Hazardous 9,407 2,774 6,468 18,649 SPRS 965 357 1,263 2,585 Total 146,565 110,906 92,603 350,074 Source: Kentucky Retirement Systems Actuarial Valuation, June 30, 2011 Employees earn service credit for months and days worked in a regular full-time position. With the exception of school board employees, all employees earn one month of service credit in the systems for every month worked in a regular full-time position. School board employees working in a regular full-time position earn service credit based upon their days worked, with 180 days worked in a regular full-time position equaling 12 months of service credit (less service credit is given for days worked less than 180). 1 Legislative changes in 2008 and 2012 set a 3-term limit. Current trustees serving a term in excess of the updated term limits are allowed to complete their current term of office. 2 Source: Board material for the August 2011 board meeting. 3 Robert Wilcher resigned his position as CERS trustee in May 2012. Per KRS 61.645(5), the KRS board will determine by a majority vote of the remaining trustees who will replace Mr. Wilcher for the remainder of his term. 4 Source: June 30, 2011 Kentucky Retirement Systems Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 5 Certain exceptions apply to the regular full-time requirement such as seasonal, temporary, and interim positions that are not subject to the participation requirements. However, statute limits the duration and frequency of use of these positions by agencies. 2

Within KERS and CERS, there are both non-hazardous and hazardous duty benefits and contribution structures. In order for a job to be classified as hazardous duty, it must meet the requirements established by state law, the employing agency must request hazardous duty coverage for the position and agree to pay the higher employer contribution rates, and the KRS Board of Trustees must review and adopt the position as hazardous duty (subject to a statutory definition). In general, hazardous positions in KERS and CERS primarily cover police, fire, EMS, and corrections employees. In 2008, the definition for CERS hazardous duty positions was amended in HB 1 for employees who began participating in the systems on or after 9/1/2008. Retirement Eligibility Employees must meet certain age and/or service credit requirements before they can retire and begin receiving benefits. In KRS, the retirement eligibility requirements vary based upon type of coverage (non-hazardous or hazardous) and the date the employee first began participating in the systems. Two columns are provided in the table below, one showing the requirements to earn an unreduced benefit (no penalties) and one showing the requirements for a reduced benefit (penalties are applied and based upon how many years the employee is short of reaching an unreduced benefit). System Unreduced Benefit Reduced Benefit KERS/CERS Participating Prior to 9/1/2008: Participating Prior to 9/1/2008: Non- Any age with at least 27 years of service; or Age 55 with at least 5 years of service; or Hazardous Age 65 with at least 4 years of service Any age with at least 25 years of service KERS & CERS Hazardous, SPRS Participating on or after 09/1/2008: Must meet rule of 87 (age+ service equals this value) and must be at least 57 years of age; or Age 65 with at least 5 years of service Participating Prior to 9/1/2008: Any age with at least 20 years of service; or Age 55 with at least 5 years of service Participating on or after 09/1/2008: Age 60 with at least 10 years of service Note: Reduction determined by actuary, 4.5% to 6.5% for each year short of unreduced benefit. Age 50 with at least 15 years of service Note: Reduction determined by actuary, 6.5% for each year short of unreduced benefit. Participating on or after 09/1/2008: Any age with at least 25 years of service; or Age 60 with at least 5 years of service Note: Employees can also purchase different types of service credit (i.e. military service, federal service) and can use the purchased service to meet the service requirements for retirement eligibility listed above. In addition, employees of KERS/SPRS agencies and many CERS agencies receive additional service credit for accumulated sick leave at retirement which can also be used to meet the service requirements for retirement eligibility listed above. However, the ability to use purchased service and sick leave service credit for retirement eligibility has been limited for new participants over time. New participants on or after 8/1/04 cannot use most service purchases towards meeting retirement eligibility requirements, and new participants on or after 9/1/08 are further restricted. In addition, sick leave service credit for new participants on or after 9/1/08 cannot be used for determining retirement eligibility. What Are the Benefits of Each Plan? Each system is designed to provide three types of benefits: a monthly retirement benefit for life based on the employee's salary and service (the pension benefit), health insurance benefits after retirement, and disability/death benefits. Information on each of these benefits is provided below and on the following pages. Monthly Retirement Benefit: Since these plans are defined benefits plans, benefits are paid based on a formula established by statute which is as follows: Final Compensation X Benefit Factor X Years of Service Credit = Annual Benefit The average salary used for determining benefits at the time of retirement. Usually the average of the highest 3 or highest 5 years of salary. A percentage based upon the retirement plan, the type of service, and the timing of the member s service. Service earned for employment, purchased service credit, and service credit awarded for accumulated sick leave at retirement provided the agency participates in a sick leave program. 3

Formula for Non-Hazardous Employees 6 FINAL COMPENSATION BENEFIT FACTOR SERVICE CREDIT Participating before 9/1/08: Avg. of Participating before 9/1/08: KERS & CERS Participating on & after 9/1/08: Includes: highest 5 years of salary, must KERS: Years of Service Factor Service earned contain at least 48 months of service, 1.97%;or 10 or less 1.10% for time worked includes lump-sum payments for 2.00% for employees with 13 Greater than 10, but no more than 20 1.30% in a regular fulltime position compensatory time. months service between Greater than 20, but no more than 26 1.50% Participating on & after 9/1/08: Avg. 1/1/98-1/1/99. Greater than 26, but no more than 30 1.75% Purchased of the 5 complete fiscal years CERS: Additional years above 30 2.00% service immediately preceding retirement, 2.2% if participating before Service credit for must contain 60 months of service (all 5 years must contain 12 months service), does not include lump-sum payments for compensatory time. 8/1/04, 2.0% if participating on or after 8/1/04 but before 9/1/08. accumulated sick leave at retirement. Formula for Hazardous Employees FINAL COMPENSATION BENEFIT FACTOR SERVICE CREDIT Participating before 9/1/08: Avg. of Participating before 9/1/08: KERS & CERS Participating on & after 9/1/08: Same as highest 3 years of salary, min. of 24 KERS: 2.49% Years of Service Factor KERS/CERS Nonhazardous. months, includes lump-sum CERS & SPRS: 2.50% 10 or less 1.30% payments for compensatory time. Greater than 10, but no more than 20 1.50% Participating on & after 9/1/08: Avg. Greater than 20, but less than 25 2.25% of the highest 3 complete fiscal years, must contain 36 months (all 3 years must contain 12 months service), does not include lump-sum payments for compensatory time. 25 or more 2.50% Note: In KERS and SPRS, all accumulated sick leave is converted to additional months of service credit. For CERS, the agency may adopt the standard or alternate sick leave program and must choose the amount of sick leave that can be converted. For new employees who begin participating in the systems on or after 9/1/08, the maximum amount of sick leave that can be converted to additional service credit is limited to 12 months. The annual benefit shown in the calculations above is paid monthly to the retiree. At retirement, a retiree may choose to take a reduced monthly benefit in order to provide a monthly benefit to a beneficiary upon their death, either for a period certain or for the life of the beneficiary. The systems administered by KRS also provide for a statutory 1.5% annual increase to these monthly benefits after retirement, often referred to as the cost of living adjustment (COLA). The COLA that would have been awarded on July 1, 2012 and July 1, 2013 will be suspended under the current provisions of the biennial budget. Note: An easy way to view the benefit structure is to look at the benefit factor as an income replacement rate. For example, the CERS non-hazardous benefit factor for many CERS employees is 2.0%. This means the formula provides 2.0% of a retiring employee's average salary for each year of service. If the employee has 30 years of service, the benefit would provide 60% of the retiring employee's average salary. Health Insurance Benefits After Retirement: The systems also provide access to group rates on medical insurance for retired members, their spouse, and dependents. Coverage for retirees not eligible for Medicare is provided through the Kentucky Employees Health Plan, the same health plan provided to state and school board employees. Coverage for Medicare eligible retirees is provided through a plan administered by or contracted through the retirement systems which then coordinates with Medicare for delivery of health benefits. As provided by state statute, the systems also subsidize medical coverage for the retiree and in some cases for the dependents of the retiree (i.e. if the member retires with hazardous duty service credit). In general, employees participating prior to 7/1/03, receive a percentage of the premium paid based upon service credit, while employees who begin participating after that date receive a set dollar amount for each year of service credit. The table below provides 6 For KERS non-hazardous participants, the retirement windows that provided a high-3 final compensation calculation and a 2.2% benefit factor for employees that met certain age and/or service requirements expired 1/1/09. The high-3 window also applied to CERS non-hazardous members but also expired 1/1/09. 4

details the benefits for non-hazardous and hazardous duty members. KERS AND CERS NON-HAZARDOUS For members participating before 07/03: Years of Service % of Premium Paid for retiree Less than 4: 0% 4 9.99 25% 10 14.99 50% 15 19.99 75% 20 or more: 100% For new participants on or after 07/03 but before 09/08: Minimum 10 years of service at retirement for retiree health benefit eligibility. Benefit of 10 per month for each year of service, adjusted by 1.5% annually. For new participants on or after 09/08: Same as before but minimum 15 years of service at retirement for benefit eligibility. KERS & CERS HAZARDOUS, SPRS For members participating before 07/03: Years of Service % of Premium Paid for retiree % of Premium Paid for spouse & dependents (hazardous service only) Less than 4: 0% 0% 4 9.99 25% 25% 10 14.99 50% 50% 15 19.99 75% 75% 20 or more: 100% 100% For new participants on or after 07/03 but before 09/08: Minimum 10 years of service at retirement for retiree health benefit eligibility. Benefit of 15 per month for each year of service, adjusted by 1.5% annually. Spouse: 10 per month for each year of haz. service upon death of member. For new participants on or after 09/08: Same as before but minimum 15 years of service at retirement for benefit eligibility. Note: Since the 2005 plan year, non-hazardous retirees participating in the Kentucky Employees Health Plan have also received a partial subsidy for dependent coverage that has been provided to state and school employees participating in the plan. Almost all service purchases made on or after 8/1/04 do not count towards meeting the service requirements for varying levels of retiree health benefits listed above. Disability and Death Benefits: Like most defined benefit plans, the systems provide benefits for those employees who become disabled or who die prior to retirement. The systems also provide death before retirement and special death in the line of duty benefits. After retirement, the benefits left to the retiree's beneficiary vary based upon the payment option selected at retirement (as previously discussed). In addition, the systems provide a 5,000 lump sum death benefit for members who retire with at least 4 years of service. Disability and death before retirement benefits are described in the table below 7. SYSTEM DISABILITY (NON-OCCUPATIONAL) DEATH BEFORE RETIREMENT KERS Nonhazardous, CERS Nonhazardous KERS Hazardous, CERS Hazardous, SPRS Minimum 5 years service to apply for benefits and approval determined by systems under criteria established by state statute. Benefit Calculation Employees participating before 8/1/04: Service used to calculate benefits is doubled but cannot exceed 25 years of service or age 65 (when additional service is added to their current age). Exception: employees with 25 years of service have their service increased to 27 years. Employees participating on or after 8/1/04: Higher of benefit calculated using actual service or 20% of member's final pay. Minimum 5 years service to apply for benefits and approval determined by systems under criteria established by state statute. Benefit Calculation Employees participating before 8/1/04: Service used to calculate benefits is doubled but cannot exceed 20 years of service or age 55 (when additional service is added to their current age). Employees participating on or after 8/1/04: Higher of benefit calculated using actual service or 25% of member's final pay. The employee s beneficiary is eligible for benefits if at the time of death the: Employee was eligible to retire Employee was less than age 55, was working at the time of death, and had at least 5 years of service Employee was less than age 55, was not working at the time of death, and had at least 12 years of service. Benefit calculated using formula and actual service earned at the time of death. Penalties apply if the member was not eligible for an unreduced benefit at the time of death. Same as above 7 Note: Employees participating in all state administered retirement systems are eligible for special benefits if they are disabled or killed in the line of duty benefits (not described in this document). 5

Reemployment After Retirement State statute places restrictions on KERS, CERS, and SPRS retirees returning to work after retirement with a participating employer of the systems. As a result of HB 1, the following restrictions/requirements are applicable to employees of these systems who retire and return to work on or after 9/1/2008: Required Break in Employment: The employee must have a 3 month break in employment before returning to any position with an employer participating in the systems, except that hazardous KERS or CERS and SPRS retirees who return to work in a full-time hazardous duty position are only required to observe a 1 month break. If the break is not observed, the employee s retirement is voided and all benefit payments issued in error shall be repaid to the systems. Both the employee and employer must certify that no pre-arranged agreement for the employee to return to work existed prior to the employee s retirement. How It works for the employee: Provided the break is observed, the employee can return to work, draw their pension, but will not contribute to the systems or earn a second pension. How it works for the employer: If the employee has returned to work in a position that would have qualified for participation in the systems, the employer is required to pay contributions to the systems and to reimburse the systems for the cost of health insurance premiums paid by the systems for the retiree (not to exceed the cost of the single premium). If the employee takes health coverage through the employer and waives coverage with the systems, then no reimbursement is required. Note: Prior to the passage of HB 1, retirees of this system could return to work and earn a second account. Required breaks in employment varied based upon position and system. In addition, employers were not required to reimburse the systems for retiree health costs prior to the bill s passage. Reciprocity Members who have service in more than one retirement plan administered by the Commonwealth of Kentucky can combine service in the plans to determine eligibility for retirement and final compensation (years of highest salary). Each system will pay a benefit based on the amount of service in that system. Example: John was employed with a local board of education in a classified position and accumulated 10 years of service in CERS. He is now employed with the same board of education as a teacher and has accumulated 17 years of service in KTRS. John would be eligible to retire at any age with no reductions in his retirement benefits because he has accumulated a combined total of 27 years of service. His salary, which was higher during his tenure as a teacher, would be used to calculate his final compensation in CERS. John would receive a retirement check from CERS based upon his 10 years of service and a separate retirement check from KTRS based on his 17 years of service. Taxation of benefits Federal Income Tax: Monthly benefits from all systems are subject to federal income tax. If a member made contributions with after-tax dollars (usually service purchases), then a portion of the monthly benefit at retirement will not be subject to federal income tax. State Income Tax: All benefits attributable to service earned on or before December 31, 1997, are exempt from Kentucky income tax. The portion of the member s benefits earned January 1, 1998 and after is subject to Kentucky income tax. However, an annual pension exclusion of 41,110 applies to this portion and other retirement income sources. FUNDING & INVESTMENTS How are Benefits Funded? As with any retirement plan, funding for system benefits and expenses are provided through three sources: employee contributions, employer contributions, and return on investment (see graphic representation on the following page). Employee contributions are set by state statute and do not vary. The employer contribution rate varies annually as determined by the actuarial valuation. Employee and employer contribution rates are provided on pages 9 to 11. 6

PENSION FUND employer contributions investments employee contributions Assets expenses benefits Measuring the Financial Health of the Plans and Determining Employer Contributions The retirement systems are required by statute to conduct an annual actuarial valuation of the plans. The purpose of the valuation, which is completed by an actuary hired by the systems, is to determine: The amount of benefits to be paid out into the future. The benefits, or future liabilities, of the plans are prescribed by law and regulation and in some cases, the board of trustees. In order to calculate the amount of benefits that will be paid out in the future, the actuary must make assumptions about things that affect the plan s money (the rate of return on investments, salary growth of employees, retiree medical inflation rates, etc.) and it s people (when will people retire, how long will they live after retirement, etc.). Once these liabilities are determined, they are discounted to today s dollars and separated, using an actuarial cost method (the systems uses the entry age normal cost method) into two components: the actuarially accrued liability (liability dedicated to service already earned by employees and retirees) and the present value of future normal cost (liability dedicated to future service of employees based upon assumptions). Note: Some key assumptions in developing the liability values include the investment return assumption, payroll growth assumption, and future medical inflation. For KRS, the investment return assumption is 7.75% per annum for all pension and insurance funds except for the KERS non-hazardous and SPRS insurance funds where the assumption is 4.5% per annum. The payroll growth assumption is 4.5% annually. The medical inflation assumptions are that premiums in the state health plan and the system s Medicare eligible plans are anticipated to increase by 10.5% and 8.5% respectively in FY 2012 trending down annually until achieving a long-term annual increase of 5% in FY 2019 and beyond. 7

The financial health of the plan. In the valuation, the Actuarial Value ofassets actuary reports several actuarial statistics useful in -Actuarially Accrued Liability evaluating the financial health of the plans as of valuation date. The two most common actuarial statistics are: the = Unfunded Liabilities Unfunded Liability and the Funding level. The Unfunded Liability is the dollar amount of the actuarially accrued Actuarial Value of Assets liabilities (liabilities for service already earned) that are not Actuarially Accrued Liability covered by the actuarial value of assets. For example, the = Funding Level KERS non-hazardous pension fund had an actuarially accrued liability 11.182 billion as of June 30, 2011 and actuarial assets of 3.727 billion, leaving an unfunded liability of 7.455 billion. The actuarially accrued liability, and in turn the unfunded liabilities, are influenced by a variety of factors investment returns, retirement rates, medical inflation rates, and contributions paid by employers. The funding level is the percent of actuarial assets to actuarially accrued liability. For example, the KERS non-hazardous pension fund had a funding level of 33.3% as of June 30, 2011. Another way to state this statistic is for every 1 in liabilities or benefits earned to date, the KERS non-hazardous pension fund held 33 cents in assets. Page 15 provides actuarial and other statistics for each of the systems as well as other data, and page 16 provides historical data on the financial health of the plans. Note: The actuarial value of assets is a smoothed market value that phases in investment gains or losses for a particular year over a 5 year period. The level of employer contributions: The employer contribution for each of the systems includes two contributions-- one for pensions and one for retiree health benefits. Each of these individual contributions is comprised of two components: a payment for normal cost (the estimated cost of the upcoming year of service for active employees) and a payment to finance the unfunded liability over a specific time period (usually 30 years). Unfunded liabilities arise when the plan fails to meet established assumptions. For example, any returns above or below the assumed 7.75% rate of return for the pension funds will increase or decrease unfunded liabilities. As the unfunded liability increases or decreases, so does the cost to employers who bear the risk or reward of when the plan fails to meet the assumption established by the actuary and the board of trustees. Funding Policies that Alter the Employer Contribution For the systems, the level of employer contributions recommended by the actuary have, or are being, adjusted based upon funding policies established by statute and by the board of trustees. KERS/SPRS: Since 2002-2003, the amount provided in the biennial budget for employer contributions to KERS and SPRS has been less than the amount recommended by the KRS board of trustees and its consulting actuary 8. In 2008, the General Assembly established a funding policy in HB 1 to reach the full actuarially required contribution for pension and retiree health for KERS non-hazardous, KERS hazardous, and SPRS by 2024-2025, 2018-2019, and 2019-2020, respectively. The policy requires an increasing percentage of the required contribution to be paid each year until the full actuarially required contribution is paid. For example, 53% of the actuarially required contribution of 44.55% for KERS non-hazardous in fiscal year 2012-2013 is 23.61% of payroll (the amounts required by the funding policy are included in the upcoming 2012-2014 biennial budget). CERS: Since the late 1980 s, the KRS Board of Trustees has established various funding policies to incrementally 8 HB 1 Funding policy for KERS & SPRS % of the actuarially required contribution paid by year Fiscal KERS Non- KERS SPRS Year Hazardous Hazardous 10-11 44% 76% 60% 11-12 48% 79% 65% 12-13 53% 83% 70% 13-14 57% 86% 75% 14-15 61% 89% 80% 15-16 65% 92% 85% 16-17 69% 95% 90% 17-18 73% 98% 95% 18-19 77% 100% 98% 19-20 81% 100% 20-21 85% 21-22 89% 22-23 93% 23-24 97% 24-25 100% 8 Some rate reductions also occurred during a few years in the 1990s but were relatively minor in relation to the current rate reductions.

increase the employer contribution to fund retiree health benefits for all systems it administers, including CERS. In 2006, the board adopted a policy to phase-in to the full actuarially required employer contribution for retiree health benefits over a 5-year period (using fiscal year 2007-2008 as a base rate and increasing the rate over the 5-year period from FY 2008-2009 through FY 2012-2013). In 2009, the General Assembly passed HB 117 requiring a 10-year phase-in period using the same start date and extending the phase-in period through FY 2017-2018. Employee and Employer Contribution Rates Employee contribution rates are set by statute as a percentage of the employee s salary and do not vary. Employee contribution rates are provided in the table below. EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION RATE (% OF PAYROLL) Participating Prior to 9/1/08 Participating on or after 9/1/08 KERS/CERS Non-Hazardous KERS/CERS Hazardous & SPRS KERS/CERS Non-Hazardous KERS/CERS Hazardous & SPRS Pension 5% 8% 5% 8% Insurance 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 5% 8% 6% 9% Note: Changed for new participants via HB 1 in 2008. Employer contributions do vary as plan experience, benefits, and assumptions change. The employer contribution rate over different points in time, including more recent employer contribution rates is provided on the chart below and on the charts on the following pages. These charts show the board 9 recommended pension and retiree health contribution (and the combined total) for employers in each system and the amount actually budgeted by the General Assembly (if applicable). 5 Historical KERS Non-Hazardous Employer Rates as a % of Payroll 5 4 3 2 1 81-82 86-87 91-92 96-97 01-02 06-07 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 Insurance 0.21% 0.48% 1.77% 3.15% 5.89% 6.45% 12.06% 12.33% 16.81% 16.41% Pension 7.04% 6.97% 5.88% 5.74% 10.68% 16.54% 18.96% 21.77% 24.30% Total 7.25% 7.45% 7.65% 8.89% 5.89% 17.13% 28.60% 31.29% 38.58% 40.71% Budgeted 7.25% 7.45% 7.65% 8.89% 5.89% 7.75% 10.01% 11.61% 16.98% 19.82% 4 3 2 1 Source: KRS Historical Employer Contribution Rates 9 For FY 08-09 and 09-10, the board recommended rate differs from the rate reported in the actuarial valuation (i.e., the actuarially recommended rate- ARC) for KERS non-hazardous and SPRS due to the investment return assumption used in the actuarial valuation versus the investment return assumption used by the board to determine the employer contribution rate. For CERS, the insurance fund contribution rate and thereby the total contribution rate adopted by the board differs from the valuation rate in FY 08-09 through the current fiscal year in the charts due to the funding policies established by the board regarding a phase-in of the insurance contribution, and HB 117 passed during the 2009 regular session that extended this phase-in period. 9

5 4 3 2 1 Historical KERS Hazardous Employer Rates: Selected Years as a % of Payroll 5 4 3 2 1 81-82 86-87 91-92 96-97 01-02 06-07 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 Insurance 0.34% 1.09% 6.17% 7.46% 12.66% 14.04% 23.94% 23.56% 20.26% 19.73% Pension 16.91% 12.91% 8.88% 10.41% 6.18% 9.28% 10.84% 11.98% 14.11% 14.11% Total 17.25% 14.00% 15.05% 17.87% 18.84% 23.32% 34.78% 35.54% 34.37% 33.84% Budgeted 17.25% 14.00% 15.05% 17.87% 18.84% 22.00% 24.35% 24.69% 26.12% 28.98% 5 4 3 2 1 Historical CERS Non-Hazardous Employer Rates: Selected Years as a % of Payroll 5 4 3 2 1 81-82 86-87 91-92 96-97 01-02 06-07 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 Insurance 0.15% 0.31% 1.38% 2.36% 6.14% 7.22% 5.74% 7.54% 6.90% 7.26% Pension 7.10% 4.94% 6.57% 6.29% 0.27% 5.97% 7.76% 8.62% 10.03% 11.70% Total 7.25% 5.25% 7.95% 8.65% 6.41% 13.19% 13.50% 16.16% 16.93% 18.96% Source: KRS Historical Employer Contribution Rates Note: The 08-09 employer contribution rates for CERS non-hazardous and hazardous were reduced in HB 1 during the 2008 special session from the amount recommended by the KRS board. 10

5 4 3 2 1 Historical CERS Hazardous Employer Rates: Selected Years as a % of Payroll 5 4 3 2 1 81-82 86-87 91-92 96-97 01-02 06-07 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 Insurance 0.13% 0.99% 5.11% 6.33% 13.22% 15.10% 14.46% 16.86% 16.46% 17.85% Pension 15.87% 13.01% 10.99% 12.36% 3.06% 13.11% 15.04% 16.11% 16.79% 17.91% Total 16.00% 14.00% 16.10% 18.69% 16.28% 28.21% 29.50% 32.97% 33.25% 35.76% Note: The 08-09 employer contribution rates for CERS non-hazardous and hazardous were reduced in HB 1 during the 2008 special session from the amount recommended by the KRS board. 10 8 6 4 2 Historical SPRS Employer Rates: Selected Years as a % of Payroll 10 8 6 4 2 81-82 86-87 91-92 96-97 01-02 06-07 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 Insurance 0.12% 1.41% 9.48% 14.21% 21.58% 21.66% 27.75% 26.64% 49.89% 54.83% Pension 18.38% 16.84% 10.09% 12.37% 20.64% 32.39% 35.23% 35.74% 39.80% Total 18.50% 18.25% 19.57% 26.58% 21.58% 42.30% 60.14% 61.87% 85.63% 94.63% Budgeted 18.50% 18.25% 19.57% 26.58% 21.58% 25.50% 30.07% 33.08% 45.54% 52.13% Source: KRS Historical Employer Contribution Rates 11

Projected Employer Contribution Rates KRS has also provided projections on the employer contributions rates over the next 20 years (as of the June 30, 2011 actuarial valuation). The projections show the rates under the HB 1 phase-in for KERS and SPRS and the insurance phase-in for CERS, assumes all future assumptions are met, and also includes an annual 1.5% COLA each year (the projections do not reflect the COLA suspension for the upcoming biennium provided by this budget). The projections for selected future years are shown in the tables below. Fiscal Year KERS Non-Hazardous KERS Hazardous SPRS Pension Health Total Pension Health Total Pension Health Total 2011-2012 11.59% 8.23% 19.82% 12.33% 16.65% 28.98% 26.55% 25.58% 52.13% 2012-2013 14.86% 8.75% 23.61% 13.41% 16.38% 29.79% 33.24% 30.43% 63.67% 2013-2014 17.29% 9.50% 26.79% 14.89% 17.32% 32.21% 39.50% 31.65% 71.15% 2015-2016 21.47% 10.93% 32.40% 15.92% 17.81% 33.73% 49.10% 31.29% 80.39% 2020-2021 33.35% 10.97% 44.32% 18.26% 16.97% 35.23% 71.22% 30.95% 102.17% 2025-2026 44.11% 10.62% 54.73% 20.03% 14.30% 34.33% 85.05% 30.71% 115.76% 2030-2031 47.82% 10.54% 58.36% 22.79% 12.96% 35.75% 100.86% 31.04% 131.90% Fiscal Year CERS Non-Hazardous CERS Hazardous Pension Health Total Pension Health Total 2011-2012 11.70% 7.26% 18.96% 17.91% 17.85% 35.76% 2012-2013 12.62% 6.93% 19.55% 20.10% 17.50% 37.60% 2013-2014 13.39% 7.38% 20.77% 21.78% 18.70% 40.48% 2015-2016 13.50% 8.30% 21.80% 22.50% 21.09% 43.59% 2020-2021 14.18% 7.83% 22.01% 25.18% 21.31% 46.49% 2025-2026 15.61% 7.36% 22.97% 29.56% 2 49.56% 2030-2031 17.82% 7.15% 24.97% 35.57% 19.63% 55.20% Source: Kentucky Retirement Systems, Twenty-Year Rate Projections with Ad-Hoc COLAs. Prepared by Cavanaugh MacDonald Consulting Inc. Sources of Deterioration of Funding Levels/Growth in Unfunded Liabilities A good deal of debate exists over the factors responsible for the deterioration in the system s funding levels and the growth in unfunded liabilities in recent years. In 2011, the systems actuary evaluated the different factors that have led to the growth in higher unfunded liabilities from the June 30, 2005 actuarial valuation to the June 30, 2011 actuarial valuation for the systems respective pension funds. These factors include investment returns less than assumed, cost of living adjustments (which are not pre-funded), benefit increases, assumption changes, employer rate reductions for KERS and SPRS, demographic and salary experience, and other factors (negative amortization of UAL, data corrections, software changes). The charts on the following pages detail these factors for each system. 12

Dem. & Salary 371 Employer Rate Reductions 948 KERS Non-Hazardous Pension Fund Factors Responsible for Unfunded Liability Growth from 2005 to 2011 (in millions of dollars) Other 1,345 Investment 1,018 Assump. Changes 690 COLAs 995 Benefits 88 Dem. & Salary 30 Employer Rate Reductions 12 Assump. Changes 28 KERS Hazardous Pension Fund Factors Responsible for Unfunded Liability Growth from 2005 to 2011 (in millions of dollars) Other (18) Benefits (1) Investment 65 COLAs 61 For the KERS non-hazardous pension fund, the unfunded liability grew from 2 billion to 7.455 billion during this time period. Over the same time frame, the funding level fell from 60% to 33.3%. For the KERS hazardous pension fund, the unfunded liability grew from 34 million to 211 million during this time period. Over the same time frame, the funding level fell from 84.1% to 70.8%. Other 692 Dem. & Salary 261 CERS Non-Hazardous Pension Fund Factors Responsible for Unfunded Liability Growth from 2005 to 2011 (in millions of dollars) Investment 1,053 Dem. & Salary 61 Assump. Changes 79 Benefits 25 CERS Hazardous Pension Fund Factors Responsible for Unfunded Liability Growth from 2005 to 2011 (in millions of dollars) Other 26 Investment 331 Assump. Changes 357 Benefits 72 COLAs 528 COLAs 214 For the CERS non-hazardous pension fund, the unfunded liability grew from 326 million to 3.288 billion during this time period. Over the same time frame, the funding level fell from 83.6% to 63.1%. For the CERS hazardous pension fund, the unfunded liability grew from 343 million to 1.079 billion during this time period. Over the same time frame, the funding level fell from 75% to 62.2%. Source: Kentucky Retirement Systems, UAL Attribution. Prepared by Cavanaugh MacDonald Consulting Inc. 13

Dem. & Salary 34 Employer Rate Reductions 40 SPRS Pension Fund Factors Responsible for Unfunded Liability Growth from 2005 to 2011 (in millions of dollars) Other 111 Investment 53 Assump. Changes (38) COLAs 64 Benefits (19) For the SPRS pension fund, the unfunded liability grew from 105 million to 349 million during this time period. Over the same time frame, the funding level fell from 77.1% to 45%. Investments & Investment Performance Kentucky Retirement Systems invests system assets in separate pension and retiree health funds. Asset allocations and fund performance over time are provided in the tables below. Data is as of April 2012. Pension Funds Asset Allocation InsuranceFunds Asset Allocation Real Return, 10% Absolute Return, 10% Real Estate, 2% Private Equity, 11% Global Fixed Income, 5% Currency Overlay, 0% High Yield, 5% Cash, 3% 1 yr. 3 yr. 5 yr. 10 yr. 1 yr. 3 yr. 5 yr. 10 yr. Total Fund 0.09% 13.46% 2.18% 5.84% Total Fund -2.93% 14.69% 0.46% 5.54% Benchmark 0.18% 13.49% 2.72% 5.91% Benchmark -0.92% 16.04% 0.95% 5.45% Assumed rate of return for pension funds is 7.75%. U.S. Equity, 20% Equitization, 0% Int. Equity, 19% Emerging Markets, 4% Core Fixed Income, 10% Currency Overlay, - 0.1% Real Return, 11.3% Absolute Return, 8.1% Real Estate, 1.0% Private Equity, 6.2% Global Fixed Income, 4.5% Source: Kentucky Retirement Systems, April 2012 Investment Performance Update High Yield, 4.6% Cash, 9.2% Core Fixed Income, 10.7% U.S. Equity, 22.9% Equitization, 0.0% Int. Equity, 18.4% Emerging Markets, 3.2% Assumed rate of return for insurance funds is 4.5% for KERS nonhazardous and SPRS; 7.75% for KERS hazardous and CERS. 14

KENTUCKY RETIREMENT SYSTEMS FINANCIAL & STATISTICAL DATA (JUNE 30, 2011) KERS KERS CERS CERS Statistical Item Non-Haz. Haz. Non-Haz. Haz. SPRS Total Pension Fund Actuarial Statistics A. Actuarial Liability (in billions) 11.182 0.721 8.918 2.859 0.634 24.315 B. Actuarial Value of Assets (in billions) 3.727 0.511 5.630 1.780 0.286 11.932 C. Unfunded Liability (diff. between A & B) (7.455) (0.211) (3.288) (1.079) (0.349) (12.382) D. Funding Level (% ratio of B. to A) 33.3% 70.8% 63.1% 62.2% 45.0% 49.1% Insurance Fund Actuarial Statistics A. Actuarial Liability (in billions) 4.280 0.507 3.074 1.648 0.438 9.947 B. Actuarial Value of Assets (in billions) 0.452 0.330 1.433 0.771 0.124 3.110 C. Unfunded Liability (diff. between A & B) (3.828) (0.177) (1.641) (0.877) (0.315) (6.838) D. Funding Level (% ratio of B. to A) 10.6% 65.1% 46.6% 46.8% 28.2% 31.3% Membership Data # of Employees 46,617 4,291 85,285 9,407 965 146,565 # of Inactive Members (Not retired or working) 38,597 3,264 65,914 2,774 357 110,906 # of Retired Members & Beneficiaries 38,597 3,064 43,211 6,468 1,263 92,603 Total 123,811 10,619 194,410 18,649 2,585 350,074 Employed Member Payroll Data Total Payroll (in billions) 1.732 0.133 2.277 0.467 0.049 4.658 Employee Contributions (in millions) 112.32 13.20 148.08 55.08 5.26 333.93 Employer Contributions (in millions) 308.81 36.91 433.61 182.80 21.97 984.10 Average Salary Reported for Retirement 37,146 31,008 26,694 48,792 50,459 31,781 Retired Member Payroll Data Total Pension Payouts (billions) 0.858 0.047 0.521 0.171 0.047 1.644 Total Retiree Health Payouts (billions) 0.166 0.016 0.137 0.052 0.012 0.383 Total Payouts (billions) 1.024 0.063 0.657 0.224 0.059 2.028 Average Annual Pension Benefit 20,436 13,994 10,871 24,675 36,839 N/A Market Value of Assets Total Pension Net Plan Assets (billions) 3.544 0.511 5.583 1.762 0.280 11.681 Total Retiree Health Net Plan Assets (billions) 0.429 0.321 1.447 0.773 0.127 3.097 Total Net Plan Assets (billions) 3.973 0.832 7.030 2.535 0.407 14.778 Source: June 30, 2011 Actuarial Valuation; June 30, 2011 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) Note: Actuarial Statistics, Membership data, Total Payroll, and Average Salary Reported for Retirement are taken from the Actuarial Valuation. All other data is taken from the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Employee and employer contributions include all contributions to the pension and insurance funds. Pension and insurance payouts include all deductions to the funds such as benefit payments, refunds, and administrative costs. 15

140.0% Pension Funds Funding Level (%): 10 Year History 70.0% Insurance Funds Funding Level (%): 10 Year History 120.0% 60.0% 100.0% 50.0% 80.0% 40.0% 60.0% 30.0% 40.0% 20.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 KERS NH 110.4% 97.4% 85.1% 73.6% 60.0% 56.9% 52.5% 45.0% 38.3% 33.3% KERS H 116.9% 108.1% 98.4% 92.3% 84.1% 83.6% 81.3% 74.5% 73.1% 70.8% CERS NH 129.6% 119.7% 105.1% 94.0% 83.6% 82.1% 78.5% 71.4% 65.6% 63.1% CERS H 111.9% 97.8% 88.8% 80.9% 75.0% 74.2% 72.9% 67.9% 65.5% 62.2% SPRS 115.3% 99.6% 88.0% 77.1% 66.6% 63.7% 59.8% 54.8% 49.7% 45.0% Pension Funds Unfunded Liability (in billions of dollars) 8.000 7.000 6.000 5.000 4.000 3.000 2.000 1.000 0.000-1.000-2.000 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 KERS NH -0.628 0.169 1.050 2.000 3.601 4.089 4.811 5.864 6.795 7.455 KERS H -0.054-0.029 0.006 0.034 0.081 0.092 0.116 0.172 0.185 0.211 CERS NH -1.232-0.869-0.251 0.326 1.017 1.192 1.573 2.262 2.912 3.288 CERS H -0.158 0.033 0.183 0.343 0.505 0.569 0.652 0.827 0.923 1.079 SPRS -0.058 0.002 0.052 0.105 0.172 0.199 0.236 0.272 0.308 0.349 0.0% 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 KERS NH 27.3% 26.5% 25.7% 22.7% 7.8% 11.9% 11.1% 11.9% 10.6% 10.6% KERS H 57.4% 53.5% 52.3% 48.6% 34.3% 49.8% 53.2% 61.4% 63.7% 65.1% CERS NH 22.8% 23.9% 24.0% 23.8% 16.9% 28.8% 32.6% 39.6% 40.9% 46.6% CERS H 30.0% 28.8% 30.3% 28.0% 21.9% 31.2% 34.7% 40.9% 41.4% 46.8% SPRS 52.5% 49.2% 48.9% 42.8% 18.1% 26.6% 27.9% 33.9% 27.9% 28.2% Insurance Funds Unfunded Liability(in billions of dollars) 8.000 7.000 6.000 5.000 4.000 3.000 2.000 1.000 0.000 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 KERS NH 1.386 1.539 1.735 2.073 7.204 4.580 4.828 3.973 3.995 3.828 KERS H 0.101 0.132 0.154 0.199 0.408 0.253 0.253 0.189 0.179 0.177 CERS NH 1.527 1.657 1.853 2.125 3.829 2.374 2.414 1.854 1.865 1.641 CERS H 0.546 0.666 0.715 0.924 1.506 1.134 1.156 0.942 0.982 0.877 SPRS 0.079 0.094 0.101 0.134 0.477 0.318 0.321 0.241 0.314 0.315 16