Positive Recognition Program (PRP) for Employee Appreciation



Similar documents
IT SERVICES AWARDS PROGRAM

OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT CODE OF PRACTICE REGARDING INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF TITLES: TITLE DESCRIPTIONS AND MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS

Honorary Degree Guidelines. University of Illinois at Chicago Honorary Degree Guidelines October 26, 2005

Responsibilities for quality assurance in teaching and learning

Boston University Performance Evaluation Program. Administrative Employees Exempt and Non-Exempt

Doctoral Dissertation Advisor/Mentoring Award. Guidelines for Application

1. Development of a Plan of Study approved by the appropriate faculty or program adviser;

Employee Rewards & Recognition Case Study AEIS - Max! Employee Reward & Recognition Program

Human Resource Strategic Plan

In Pursuit of Excellence and Equity Gevirtz Graduate School of Education Strategic Plan

KECK SCHOOL OF MEDICINE GOVERNANCE DOCUMENT June 20, 2011

THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. O-4: Governance of the College of Graduate Studies

The University of Texas at San Antonio. Business Affairs 2016 STRATEGIC PLAN December 2007

The university of Akron bylaws of the faculty senate. Name. The name of this body is the faculty senate of the university of Akron.

The University of Louisville College of Business Dean

Benchmark Best Practices: Departmental Leadership

Executive Senate Meeting Minutes March 6, Recorder: Kathleen M. Kielar

West Dunbartonshire Council s Employee Recognition Framework

How To Run An Nhshl Graduate Group

GOAL I - Help students successfully obtain their diverse educational goals

Founding Dean School of Nursing

Academic Division Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)

Corporate Governance Guidelines. Kenon Holdings Ltd. Adopted as of September 17, 2014

University of Detroit Mercy. Performance Communication System (PCS)

Directors may, from time to time, direct.

ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEES AND COUNCILS

DEPARTMENT PLAN. The Department of Counseling, Educational, and Developmental Psychology. College of Education and Human Development

Performance Evaluation. August 20, 2013

Core Leadership Competencies

Sample. Employee Recognition Presentation

CONSTITUTION COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA PREAMBLE

Computer Science Graduate Degree Requirements

University Of Alaska Anchorage College Of Health Department Of Human Services. Criteria and Guidelines For Faculty Evaluation

Graduate School Strategic Plan

Position Description Senior Associate Dean and Chief Operating Officer of the Darden Graduate School of Business Administration University of Virginia

Massachusetts College of Art and Design Dean of Admissions and Enrollment Management Boston, Massachusetts

2015 EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS

Business leaders have long recognized that attracting and

FORENSIC SCIENCE GRADUATE GROUP BYLAWS

WSU TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Bonneville Power Administration Performance Management Program Policy

Overview of Performance Management

Supervisor s Guide to Performance Management: Performance Evaluation 1

2013 EXCELLENCE IN FEDERAL CAREER AWARDS PROGRAM AWARD NOMINATION INSTRUCTIONS WITH NOMINATION FORM.

BYLAWS COUNSELING AND CONSULTATION SERVICES (CCS) 1.0 COUNSELING AND CONSULTATION SERVICES MEMBERSHIP

COMPARISON OF CLINICIAN TEACHER AND SALARIED CLINICAL FACULTY PATHWAYS, PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES 9/22/14

Faculty of Social Sciences By-laws

Creighton University Annual Staff Performance Review Frequently Asked Questions

Division of Electrical & Computer Engineering

Objectives. 3SE Day Hospital. Evidence for Staff Recognition. Why develop an award?

Guidelines for Graduate Teaching Assistantships and Instructional Assistants at The George Washington University

Mechanics on the Search for Quarterly / Yearly EMPLOYEE AWARDS BRANCH EMPLOYEE, MODEL EMPLOYEE (Rank and File Level) and ACHIEVER (Supervisory Level)

MECHANICAL AND AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING GRADUATE PROGRAM BYLAWS

RESEARCH DEGREE REGULATIONS

ASSOCIATION FOR GENERAL AND LIBERAL STUDIES 2008 AGLS Awards for Improving General Education: Effective Program Processes

DHS Policy & Procedure for Promotion of Clinical Faculty

School of Social Work By Laws

FACULTY BYLAWS E. J. OURSO COLLEGE OF BUSINESS LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND AGRICULTURAL & MECHANICAL COLLEGE

Computer Science Graduate Degree Requirements

Pima Community College District. Vice Chancellor of Human Resources

HONORARY DEGREE POLICY By action of the Faculty Senate (Date)

Rules of Organization and Bylaws Gladys A. Kelce College of Business

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

The Rice University Sport Business Alliance Constitution

Compensation and Salary Administration Guidelines For Administrative and Staff Positions

POSITION DESCRIPTION

Doctoral Student Handbook EdD in Educational Leadership & Management

Staff Performance Review Policy and Procedure

Guidelines for Departmental Faculty Compensation Plans. University of Massachusetts Medical School & UMass Memorial Healthcare, Inc.

ADS Chapter 461 Employee Evaluation Program, Foreign Service and Senior Foreign Service

Ally Financial Inc. Board of Directors Governance Guidelines

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Promotion and Tenure Guidelines

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & APPRAISAL SYSTEM Civil Service of Jamaica

NOMINATION PACKAGE. Supervisor & Director: Nav Bassi

Transcription:

Positive Recognition Program (PRP) for Employee Appreciation Program Overview, Polices and Guidelines Reinalda Medina, Assistant Vice President of Administrative and Client Services Brandis Ruffin, Human Resources Manager 1/1/2013 The Positive Recognition Program for Employee Appreciation is an organizational response to the continued enhancement and refinement of programs currently implemented. Copyright the Office of Human Resources, Human Capital Planning Development and Strategies Unit, 2013 (Revised 3/12/2013)

Table of Contents PREFACE... 2 PURPOSE... 2 PROGRAM DESIGN... 2 Overview... 2 The Presidential Employee Recognition Committee... 3 PERC Committee Responsibilities... 3 Service Limits... 3 PERC Committee Meeting Schedule... 3 Nomination Guidelines... 3 Nomination Process... 3 Selection Process... 4 PROGRAM EVALUATION AND MODIFICATION... 4 DESCRIPTIONS OF AWARDS AND ELIGIBILITY... 5 BIBLIOGRAPHY... 7 APPENDIX I: POSITIVE RECOGNITION PROGRAM COMMITTEE... I APPENDIX II: SAMPLE NOMINATION FORM... II APPENDIX III: RESOURCES, MODELS, AND RELATED LINKS... IV 1 P a g e

PREFACE While the awards and categories listed in this program offer a wide range of opportunities to recognize employee performance, this program is not intended to eliminate or reduce the significance of informal appreciation and recognition. Daily recognition from supervisors, colleagues, and customers are highly encouraged. Informal recognition supports the formal program and is extremely important to the well-being and morale of Queens College, City University of New York. PURPOSE The Queens College Positive Recognition Program (PRP) for Employee Appreciation has been developed in response to the need to formally recognize every type of employee for outstanding performance and achievement. According to a survey conducted by the Society of Human Resources Management, eight out of ten organizations have developed and implemented an employee recognition program (SHRM/Globoforce, 2011). More locally, an anonymous survey was conducted through the Office of Human Resources at Queens College of all employees to gauge employment satisfaction levels. Six hundred sixty six responses were received. Of this sample, over thirty percent of respondents reported low satisfaction levels with feedback and recognition they receive as employees of the College (The Office of Human Resources Organizational and Employee Development Unit, 2011). Faced with an economy that has left members of the community feeling insecure and overwhelmed, recognition programs, which have a positive correlation with promoting employee engagement and satisfaction, are projected to enhance the Queens College experience for stakeholders. The 2008-2013 Queens College Strategic Plan calls for focus and commitment to achieving strategic goals: to advance our academic programs, build a culture of community, to solidify the financial foundation, and to become a leader in accountability and transparency. Employees who make significant strides towards reaching these goals deserve special recognition and should serve as models in the community. With these conditions in mind, the purpose of PRP is to: a) identify employees who serve as models to the community for professional achievement, b) reinforce Queens College s commitment to recognizing outstanding performance, c) respond to reported employee satisfaction levels for employee feedback and recognition, d) promote a sense of community by providing formal opportunities to celebrate the accomplishments of our most valuable resource; the human capital of Queens College. PROGRAM DESIGN Overview The PRP provides a systematic method for acknowledging employee achievements by publicly announcing such accomplishments to the College community and celebrating these achievements monthly, quarterly and annually. The Program is managed by the Office of Human Resources Human Capital Planning and Development Unit, and facilitated by the unit s supervisor, the HR Manager. With a calendar that is concurrent to the formative academic calendar (September 1st August 31st), the PRP encourages employee recognition, selects award recipients, and hosts events to celebrate outstanding employee achievement. 2 P a g e

The Presidential Employee Recognition Committee In order for the PRP to maximize its value to the campus community, a highly motivated team is designated by the President. The PERC Committee is comprised of an aggregate of the Campus community. Members include former award winners, classified staff, non-teaching instructional staff, faculty, and members of the ECP. There are a total of thirteen (13) seats on the Committee; seven (7) seats must be filled when reaching a decision. Other than previous award winners, members are selected through an application process with recommendations made by the Assistant Vice President of Administrative and Client Services for approval by the President. The AVP, Office of Administrative and Client Services serves as Advisor to the Committee and is required to vote when a tie breaker is required. PERC Committee Responsibilities The PERC Committee is responsible for reviewing all nominations and selecting award recipients, coordinating all PRP events, and producing PRP awards and take-aways. To ensure objectivity, members of the PERC Committee may submit nominations but may not vote on their submission. Specific duties include: Coordinate PRP events; plan and make arrangements for the award ceremony; Secure awards and gifts; Design award certificates and plaques; prepare the certificates to be presented to the winners; Market and communicate events to the campus community; publicize the awards ceremony; Communicate selections to senior leadership; Develop outside sources to provide rewards and prizes. Service Limits Members serve on the PERC Committee for a period of no less than two years. After a member reaches the end of the period, the President makes a decision regarding continued service. PERC Committee Meeting Schedule Meetings are held on a bi-monthly basis on the third Wednesday of meeting months at 3:00 PM in the conference room located in Office of Human Resources, Kiely Hall 163. The schedule is as follows: Meeting 1 September Meeting 3 January Meeting 5 May Meeting 2 November Meeting 4 March Meeting 6 July Nomination Guidelines Recognizing the unique skills and contributions of employees is the cornerstone of a PERC. Each award has unique eligibility criteria to ensure that employees have an opportunity to be considered for an award. The timeline for submitting nominations is open and unrestricted. Nominations received by the first Friday of February will be reviewed for the annual award ceremony, which is held in March, the month in which Employee Appreciation day occurs. Nomination Process In an effort to support the campus Go Green initiative, the nomination process for this program is electronic. The nomination form is located on SurveyMonkey, the world's leading provider of web-based survey solutions, and maintained by the Office Human Resources. This nomination form is also accessible to other stakeholders of the campus 3 P a g e

community, such as customers and guests of the College. To ensure that employees who do not have access to a computer have the opportunity to engage in the nomination process, hard copy nomination forms are available through the Office of Human Resources. The Office of Human Resources is responsible for ensuring that all nominations are presented to the PERC Committee for consideration, and that guidelines are adhered to. Selection Process The PERC Committee ensures that the method for evaluating nominations and selecting award winners conforms to the award eligibility criteria. The Committee is mindful that: All Committee discussions are confidential. The nominator may be contacted for additional information. Changes may not be made to Nomination Forms without discussion and agreement by the PERC Committee. Each category need not have a winner. If the Committee finds that accomplishments in a particular category are deficient or that there are not enough nominations, the committee may choose not to make an award in that category. If two (or more) nominees within a category are deemed to have achievements of equal weight, it is possible that multiple winners may be declared. PROGRAM EVALUATION AND MODIFICATION PRP is intended to be an active and responsive process. As such the program is assessed and evaluated regularly to provide program enhancements and adjustments as the community develops. 4 P a g e

DESCRIPTIONS OF AWARDS AND ELIGIBILITY In addition to the four awards and recognition events already launched including the Presidents Excellence Awards for High Education Officer and Gittleson titles, Administrative Professionals Day, and the Annual Reception for Buildings & Grounds and Security Staff, the PERC has developed and will be responsible for awards in the following categories: Departmental Award Knight s Court Award The Knight s Court Award recognizes departmental and departmental sub-unit excellence. Seven such awards granted. Nominations are made by stakeholders of Queens College. Eligibility is open to departments and sub-units with two or more employees. Leadership Awards Discimus ut Serviamus The Discimus ut Serviamus Award is a leadership award that recognizes an individual who has integrated an improvement that benefits the entire QC Community. Eligibility is open to leaders in Faculty, Non-teaching Instructional, Classified Managerial, and ECP titles only. Nominations are made by the President, Vice Presidents, and Executive staff. The Jewel of Queens College The Jewel of Queens College award recognizes supervisors and managers who model QC s core values: Excellence, Community, Global Perspective, Accountability, and Integrity. Nomination for this award is made by a staff member who reports directly to the supervisor. Eligibility is open to supervisors in classified and non-teaching instructional titles such as but not limited to: Higher Education Assistant Higher Education Associate IT Associate IT Manager Senior Engineers Custodial/ Principal Supervisors Trades Titles Security Titles Classified Managerial Project Managers 5 P a g e

Annual Employee Awards Rookie of the Year This award recognizes any new employee with outstanding achievement. Nomination is made by fellow members of the department. Eligibility is open to employees who have been in his/her position for at least three but no more than twelve months at the college. Above and Beyond the Call of Duty (ABCD) The ABCD Award recognizes any employee who demonstrates positive and professional interaction with others who willingly demonstrates performance beyond what is contractually expected. Nominations are made by any stakeholder of Queens College. Eligibility is open to any employee in good standing with the College. The Strategic Enabler Award The Strategic Enabler Award recognizes any employee who demonstrates commitment to furthering elements of the Queens College Strategic Plan. Nomination is made by the Chief Operating Officer. Eligibility is open to QC employees who work on the QC campus and affiliated entities. Quarterly Employee Awards Honor Roll The Honor Roll recognizes productive employees who through stellar performance of daily functions significantly contribute to the strength and vibrancy of the Queens College community. Eligibility is open to all employees. Nominations are made by any supervisory personnel. Take a Bow! Take a Bow is an honorable mention given quarterly that recognizes employees who demonstrate commitment to professional growth, development and enrichment, and have completed a certificate program or degree. Eligibility is open to non-supervisory or managerial employees. Nominations are made through the Office of Human Resources. 6 P a g e

Awards Already Launched President s Excellence Awards Gittleson Excellence Award This award recognizes any member of the Gittleson title series who continuously contributes to the effective delivery of the services throughout the Campus Community; personifies the core value of Queens College when interacting with the College community at large and beyond; regularly shows good judgment, independent thinking, and initiative; and goes above and beyond performance expectations; displays a sense of responsibility for his/her actions; demonstrates willingness to continuous self-development and a desire to learn new approaches to delivering efficient/effective services to campus customers; is a role model and an inspiration to all members of the College community, students, faculty, staff, visitors, and business and community partners. Nominations can be made by any member of the campus community. Eligibility is open to any member of the Gittleson series who has been in position for five years or more. There is a five year waiting period after winning this award. HEO Excellence Award This award recognizes any member of the HEO title series who: continuously demonstrates value-added performance through participation in college initiatives, conveys, through interactions with the campus community, a dedication to excellence, service opportunity; is a role model to others in the campus community; through self-assessment and educational outreach, continues to master new business process innovations and approaches for meaningful integration with the campus community. Nominations can be made by any member of the campus community. Eligibility is open to any staff member within the HEO series who has been in position for five years or more. There is a five year waiting period after winning this award. BIBLIOGRAPHY SHRM/Globoforce. (2011). SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs. Alexandria: Society for Human Resource Management. The Office of Human Resources Organizational and Employee Development Unit. (2011). 2010 Employee Satisfaction Survey Results. Flushing: Queens College. 7 P a g e

APPENDIX I: POSITIVE RECOGNITION PROGRAM COMMITTEE Presidential Employee Recognition Committee Members 2012-2013 Brandis Ruffin, PRP Administrator Human Resources Manager Office of Human Resources Susan Mavrelis, HR Special Event & Talent Management Coordinator Office of Human Resources Kimberly S. Charles, PRP Coordinator Talent Acquisition Assistant Office of Human Resources Reinalda Medina, PRP Advisor Assistant Vice President Administrative and Client Services Jefferson Barnes Deputy Chief Information Officer Office of Converging Technologies June Bobb, PhD Assistant Provost Office of the Provost Deena Feldman CUNY Administrative Assistant (Retired) Security Office Eva Fernandez, PhD Assistant Vice Provost Center for Teaching and Learning Denese Gordon Administrative Superintendent Office of Buildings and Grounds Meryl Kaynard, JD General & Special Counsel of Labor/Management Relations Eugenia Paulicelli, PhD Professor European Languages and Literature Sandra Mew Administrative Executive Assistant Vice President/COO Jennifer Jarvis Assistant Vice President Student Affairs Adam Rockman Vice President Student Affairs Cynthia Rountree Chief Diversity Officer Office of Compliance and Diversity Programs Donna Schultz CUNY Office Assistant Earth & Environmental Sciences Simone L. Yearwood Assistant Professor Benjamin Rosenthal Library Dana Weinberg, PhD Dean Faculty of Social Sciences Steven Whalen Communications Manager Office of Communications I P a g e

APPENDIX II: SAMPLE NOMINATION FORM Nominee Nominee Department Nominee Title Length of Service in Position Awards Award Description Eligibility ABCD Discumus ut Serviamus Gittlesons Excellence Award HEO Excellence Award Honor Roll Jewel of QC Knights Court The ABCD Award recognizes any employee who demonstrates positive and professional interaction with others who are willingly demonstrates performance beyond what is contractually expected. Nominations are made by any stakeholder of Queens College. The Discumus ut Serviamus Award is a leadership award that recognizes an individual who has integrated an improvement that benefits the entire QC Community. This award recognizes any member of the Gittleson title series who continuously contributes to the effective delivery of the services throughout the Campus Community; personifies the core value of Queens College when interacting with the College community at large and beyond; regularly shows good judgment, independent thinking, and initiative; and goes above and beyond performance expectations; displays a sense of responsibility for his/her actions; demonstrates willingness to continuous self-development and a desire to learn new approaches to delivering efficient/effective services to campus customers; is a role model and an inspiration to all members of the College community, students, faculty, staff, visitors, and business and community partners. Nominations can be made by any member of the campus community. This award recognizes any member of the HEO title series who: continuously demonstrates value-added performance through participation in college initiatives, conveys, through interactions with the campus community, a dedication to excellence, service opportunity; is a role model to others in the campus community; through self-assessment and educational outreach, continues to master new business process innovations and approaches for meaningful integration with the campus community. Nominations can be made by any member of the campus community. The Honor Roll recognizes productive employees who through stellar performance of daily functions significantly contribute to the strength and vibrancy of the Queens College community. The Jewel of Queens College award recognizes supervisors and managers who model QC s core values: Excellence, Community, Global Perspective, Accountability, and Integrity. Nomination for this award is made by a staff member who reports directly to the supervisor. The Knights Court Award recognizes departmental excellence. Five such awards are granted, one each to the Division of Math and Natural Sciences, Division of Education, Division of Arts & Humanities, Division of Social Sciences, and the Division of Administration. Nominations are made by stakeholders of Queens College. Eligibility is open to all employees in good standing with the College. Eligibility is open to leaders in Faculty, Non-teaching, Classified Managerial, and ECP titles only. Nominations are made by the President, Vice Presidents, and Executive staff. Eligibility is open to any member of the Gittleson series who has been in position for five years or more. Eligibility is open to any staff member within the HEO series who has been in position for five years or more Eligibility is open to all employees. Nominations are made by any supervisor personnel. Eligibility is open to supervisors in classified and non-instructional titles including: Higher Education Assistant (HEa) Higher Education Associate (HEA) Senior Engineers Custodial Supervisors Principal Supervisors IT Associate IT Manager Eligibility is open to departments with two or more employees. II P a g e

Take a bow! Rookie of the Year The Strategic Enabler Take a Bow is a bi-monthly honorable mention that recognizes employees who demonstrate commitment to professional growth, development and enrichment, and have completed a certificate program or degree. This award recognizes any new employee with outstanding achievement. Nomination is made by fellow members of the department. The Strategic Enabler Award recognizes any employee who demonstrates commitment to furthering elements of the Queens College Strategic Plan. Nomination is made by the Chief Operating Officer. Eligibility is open to nonsupervisory or managerial employees. Nominations are made through the Office of Human Resources. Eligibility is open to employees who have been in his/her position for at least three but no more than twelve months. Eligibility is open to QC employees who work on the QC campus and affiliated entities. Please describe the qualities that make this nominee a good candidate for the award indicated above. Using award descriptions please use specific examples of how the nominee represents an award from the Positive Recognition Program for Employee Appreciation. Additional pages may be attached. Nominator Name Department Title Date III P a g e

APPENDIX III: RESOURCES, MODELS, AND RELATED LINKS University of Buffalo Employee Program Attitude of Gratitude: UB begins with U The OHR at UB oversees and guides departments in running individual recognition programs http://hr.buffalo.edu/index.php?module=pagemaster&page_user_op=view_page&page_id=659 Best Practices Site: http://hr.buffalo.edu/index.php?module=pagemaster&page_user_op=view_page&page_id=663 University of Michigan VOICES of the Staff is a volunteer-based program offering University of Michigan staff members an opportunity to share ideas and define the campus community issues that matter most to university employees. Employee Recognition Page: http://www.voices.umich.edu/teams/rewards/index.html Rutgers University Provides recognition both formally and informally http://uhr.rutgers.edu/emprec/emprecideas.htm New York University Three award programs: one for administration, one for staff and administration, and one for service http://www.nyu.edu/employees/career-development/recognition-programs.html Princeton University OHR guides and facilitates University in recognition http://www.princeton.edu/hr/progserv/recog/ IV P a g e