UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 13 R-1 Line #62



Similar documents
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 Budget Estimates

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 President's Budget Submission

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 President's Budget Submission

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 President's Budget Submission

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #159

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Institutions

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 Budget Estimates

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED United States Special Operations Command Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #261

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Security Service Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #178

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Health Program Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #9

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #200

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY Quantity of RDT&E Articles MDAP/MAIS Code: 488

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element Continuing Continuing IA3: Information Systems Security Program

UNCLASSIFIED FY Prior Years FY 2013 FY Total Cost. COST ($ in Millions) The FY 2015 OCO Request will be submitted at a later date.

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE N / Directed Energy and Electric Weapon System. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #50

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Information Systems Agency Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #131

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 53 R-1 Line #138

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND STRATEGIC BUSINESS PLAN

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #145

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 22 R-1 Line #59

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #165

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

Interos Corporate Capabilities

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 30 R-1 Line #241

Followup Audit: Enterprise Blood Management System Not Ready for Full Deployment

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / High Performance Computing Modernization Program. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #139

Benefits gained from using new maintenance concepts and international logistics standards

DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE WIDE Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 Amended President's Budget

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 12 R-1 Line #145

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 19 R-1 Line #183

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

OPNAVINST A N4 5 Jun Subj: OPERATING MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES AND GOVERNMENT FURNISHED MATERIAL MANAGEMENT

Department of Defense MANUAL. DoD Integrated Materiel Management (IMM) for Consumable Items: Operating Procedures for Item Management Coding (IMC)

Solutions. Delivering a Logistics Common Operating Picture and Total Asset Accountability

Ideas for a More Proactive Role for Parts Management and DMSMS in Acquisition

TITLE III INFORMATION SECURITY

Status of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Cost, Schedule, and Management Actions Taken to Address Prior Recommendations

GAO MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS. Selected Defense Programs Need to Implement Key Acquisition Practices

OPNAVINST A USFF/CNO N3/N5 10 Nov 2014

Ms. Patricia Hamburger

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

DEFENSE TRAVEL MANAGEMENT OFFICE. Defense Travel Management Office FY 2012 FY 2016 Strategic Plan

Total Ownership Cost (TOC) and Cost as an Independent Variable (CAIV)

IBM RFID for Supply Chain and Logistics: Reusable Asset Tracking solution

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

CUSTOMER KEYNOTE Hal Buddenbohm

Naval Education and Training (NETC) Distance Learning Perspective

TECHNOLOGY BRIEF. Business Benefits from Radio Frequency Identification (RFID)

Four distribution strategies for extending ERP to boost business performance

Report via OMB s Integrated Data Collection (IDC), 10

DESIGNED FOR YOUR INDUSTRY. SCALED TO YOUR BUSINESS. READY FOR YOUR FUTURE. SAP INDUSTRY BRIEFING FOR HEATING, VENTILATION, AIR CONDITIONING, AND

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 22 R-1 Line #163

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

NASCIO EA Development Tool-Kit Solution Architecture. Version 3.0

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Atlantic

26/10/2015. Enterprise Information Systems. Learning Objectives. System Category Enterprise Systems. ACS-1803 Introduction to Information Systems

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HANDBOOK PARTS MANAGEMENT. This handbook is for guidance only. Do not cite this document as a requirement.

NAVFAC EXWC Platform Information Technology (PIT) Cyber Security Initiatives

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY HEADQUARTERS CAMERON STATION ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

Implementation of the DoD Management Control Program for Navy Acquisition Category II and III Programs (D )

GOVERNMENT USE OF MOBILE TECHNOLOGY

SECTION C: DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS/WORK STATEMENT

Technology management in warship acquisition

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

System/Data Requirements Definition Analysis and Design

DESIGNED FOR YOUR INDUSTRY. SCALED TO YOUR BUSINESS. READY FOR YOUR FUTURE. SAP INDUSTRY BRIEFING FOR ELEVATOR, ESCALATOR AND MOVING SIDEWALK

a GAO GAO DOD BUSINESS SYSTEMS MODERNIZATION Navy ERP Adherence to Best Business Practices Critical to Avoid Past Failures

Accenture Federal Services. Federal Solutions for Asset Lifecycle Management

Department of the Navy ebusiness Operations Office

Marine Corps. Commercial Mobile Device Strategy

D E P A R T M E N T O F THE NAVY

The Future of Census Bureau Operations

Acquisition Decision Memorandum for the Defense Integrated Military Human Resources System

SPAWAR HQ ARCHITECTURE AND HUMAN SYSTEMS GROUP Human-Systems Integration/Systems Engineering Support Performance Work Statement

DEFENSE LOGISTICS. Actions Needed to Improve Department-Wide Management of Conventional Ammunition Inventory

A Candid Survey of Defense Managers December 2014

Defense Contract Management Agency

QAD ENTERPRISE APPLICATIONS

The Navy Needs to Improve the Management of Parts Required to Sustain the AN/SPY 1 Phased Array Radar System

ISSUE BRIEF. Cloud Security for Federal Agencies. Achieving greater efficiency and better security through federally certified cloud services

DOD BUSINESS SYSTEMS MODERNIZATION. Additional Action Needed to Achieve Intended Outcomes

ACS-1803 Introduction to Information Systems. Enterprise Information Systems. Lecture Outline 6

DoD Application Store: Enabling C2 Agility?

How To Manage The Navy Marine Corps Intranet

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Flexible, Life-Cycle Support for Unique Mission Requirements

NAS Fallon - A Top Gun Solution. Automated Fuels Management System - Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada, U.S.A.

Transcription:

Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base R1 Program Element (Number/Name) FY 2015 FY 2015 OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Cost To Complete Total Program Element 33.577 3.452 3.847 3.873 3.873 3.899 3.313 3.305 3.115 Continuing Continuing 2955: JEDMICS 32.682 2.561 2.899 2.961 2.961 2.971 2.369 2.344 2.136 Continuing Continuing 3223: Logistics R&D 0.895 0.891 0.948 0.912 0.912 0.928 0.944 0.961 0.979 Continuing Continuing # The FY 2015 OCO Request will be submitted at a later date. A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification Includes development and evaluation of incentive systems for improving the productivity of civilian and military personnel. Identifies barriers to increased productivity and evaluates the effect of removing them. Develops techniques for easing the introduction of new technology to the work place. Identifies and evaluates methods for improving the quality of worklife. Excludes civilian and military manpower and their related costs and military construction costs which are included in appropriate Management and Support elements in this program. JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: This program is funded under ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES because it includes all efforts necessary to evaluate integrated technologies, representative models or prototype systems in a high fidelity and realistic operating environment. B. Program Change Summary ($ in Millions) FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base FY 2015 OCO FY 2015 Total Previous President's Budget 3.811 5.797 3.874 3.874 Current President's Budget 3.452 3.847 3.873 3.873 Total Adjustments 0.359 1.950 0.001 0.001 Congressional General Reductions Congressional Directed Reductions 1.950 Congressional Rescissions Congressional Adds Congressional Directed Transfers Reprogrammings SBIR/STTR Transfer 0.120 Rate/Misc Adjustments 0.001 0.001 Congressional General Reductions Adjustments 0.239 Total Cost Navy Page 1 of 13 R1 Line #62

Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) Change Summary Explanation Technical: Not applicable. Schedule: Not applicable. R1 Program Element (Number/Name) Navy Page 2 of 13 R1 Line #62

Exhibit R2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base R1 Program Element (Number/Name) 2955 / JEDMICS FY 2015 FY 2015 OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Cost To Complete 2955: JEDMICS 32.682 2.561 2.899 2.961 2.961 2.971 2.369 2.344 2.136 Continuing Continuing Quantity of RDT&E Articles 0.000 # The FY 2015 OCO Request will be submitted at a later date. A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification In FY85 Congress directed the Services and Defense Logistics Agency to permanently capture, manage and control engineering data in digital format so it would be available to support competitive spares reprocurement. The Joint Engineering Data Management Information & Control System (JEDMICS) program manages and controls 106,000,000 engineering images and has 25,000 authorized users responsible for over 70,000 user sessions per month. Over 1.5 million digital images are retrieved each month. New data and new users are added each month as DoD reengineers its business processes to take advantage of digital data that is managed and controlled for corporate reuse. The JEDMICS system is deployed at 6 interoperable sites that service 600 locations worldwide. Data stored in JEDMICS is used for Logistics Support, Spares reprocurement, Weapons Systems procurement, Engineering, Maintenance, Distribution, Manufacturing, Air National Guard and Deployed Engineering Technical Services organizations. JEDMICS facilitates work process redesign since it brings the electronic drawings to the desktop, shop floor or flight line in real time eliminating walk, wait and slack time to retrieve drawings. Additionally, Administrative Lead Time, Repair Turn Around Time, Engineering Change Proposal processing time, demilitarization time, and all cycle times dependent on engineering data have decreased with the real time availability of digital engineering data. JEDMICS also facilitates Electronic Commerce since it produces digital technical data packages that can be forwarded along with an electronic order. Funds are for Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) test, evaluation and integration. JEDMICS development efforts are required to integrate and test COTS upgrades. Title: JEDMICS Development Description: Conduct development efforts associated with JEDMICS software releases. Conduct COTS requirements definition, evaluation, integration and testing of annual baseline releases. Conduct technology insertion of the JEDMICS system that is required to protect the $21B digital data asset managed in JEDMICS. These annual releases are necessary to incorporate changes that are essential to keeping the system running within the Navy's Enterprise. They include Service mandated Information Technology changes, storage capability increases for emerging engineering data formats, changes to accommodate commercial hardware and software endoflife product obsolescence, and defenses for newly recognized Information Assurance vulnerabilities affecting the systems various software applications. Develop and integrate JEDMICS Software Release 3.0.14. 2.501 2.847 Total Cost 2.909 Navy Page 3 of 13 R1 Line #62

Exhibit R2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 R1 Program Element (Number/Name) 2955 / JEDMICS Develop and integrate JEDMICS Software Release 3.0.15. Develop and integrate JEDMICS Software Release 3.0.16. Title: JEDMICS Test Description: Conduct test and readiness reviews and functional performance tests on JEDMICS system. 0.025 0.025 0.026 Complete DT of JEDMICS Software Release 3.0.13. Initiate DT of JEDMICS Software Release 3.0.14. Complete DT of JEDMICS Software Release 3.0.14. Initiate DT of JEDMICS Software Release 3.0.15. Complete DT of JEDMICS Software Release 3.0.15. Initiate DT of JEDMICS Software Release 3.0.16. Title: JEDMICS Evaluation & Review 0.035 0.027 0.026 Description: Conduct technical evaluations and configuration control reviews of JEDMICS system. Conduct technical evaluations and reviews for JEDMICS Software Release 3.0.15. Conduct technical evaluations and reviews for JEDMICS Software Release 3.0.16. Conduct technical evaluations and reviews for JEDMICS Software Release 3.0.17. C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions) Remarks Accomplishments/Planned Programs Subtotals 2.561 2.899 2.961 Navy Page 4 of 13 R1 Line #62

Exhibit R2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 R1 Program Element (Number/Name) 2955 / JEDMICS D. Acquisition Strategy Execution of solesource negotiated requirements type contract for engineering, design, development and test efforts. Performancebased reviews conducted quarterly by the Project Management Office. E. Performance Metrics 1. Complete testing, integration, & upgrade of three major embedded Commercial OfftheShelf products. 2. Test & integrate system Information Assurance Vulnerability Management software patch upgrades four times. 3. Complete development, testing, & integration of a minimum twenty corrected highpriority software problem reports. Navy Page 5 of 13 R1 Line #62

Exhibit R4, RDT&E Schedule Profile: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 R1 Program Element (Number/Name) 2955 / JEDMICS Navy Page 6 of 13 R1 Line #62

Exhibit R2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base R1 Program Element (Number/Name) Navy Page 7 of 13 R1 Line #62 FY 2015 FY 2015 OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Cost To Complete 3223: Logistics R&D 0.895 0.891 0.948 0.912 0.912 0.928 0.944 0.961 0.979 Continuing Continuing Quantity of RDT&E Articles 0.000 # The FY 2015 OCO Request will be submitted at a later date. A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification Stable annual funding is required to facilitate implementation and execution of a robust, flexible Logistics R&D program that will provide the means for Naval Supply Systems Command (NAVSUP) to effectively pursue solutions to missionrelated capability/technology gaps. The NAVSUP Logistics R&D program has an established infrastructure and business process for ensuring that R&D funds are applied to projects that address high priority enterprise needs established in accordance with OPNAV goals and the NAVSUP Commander's Guidance. From a process perspective, Log R&D investments are governed by a NAVSUP enterprisewide Executive Steering Group (ESG) chaired by the NAVSUP Vice Commander, and comprised of SES and Command leadership representatives. The ESG ratifies capability/technology gaps identified by all activities within the enterprise, and then assesses and prioritizes all proposed Log R&D initiatives in accordance with their potential for filling the established gap and generating return on investment. The established Log R&D business management process has currently identified capability/technology gaps in the following general areas: 1) the need to develop technology enhancements promoting the movement of shipboard supply operations ashore, especially as it relates to optimally manned ships, 2) developing and/or modernizing shipboard equipment, material or processes for which NAVSUP exercises Technical Authority, 3) developing and modernizing Information Technology (IT) and Automatic Identification Technology (AIT) applications to enhance performance of supply chain management and logistics functions (e.g., remote diagnostics/ prognostics, intransit visibility, unique item identification) that are not supported by Navy ERP, and 4) collaborating with acquisition program managers to reduce total ownership costs. This modest R&D investment will establish a NAVSUP Logistics R&D Program to explore additional technologies and significantly increase potential cost savings. Examples of specific issues/projects that are under consideration for investment of Log R&D funding as a result of the FY10 NAVSUP capability gap and initiative review include: Automated inventory management system; Shipboard ozone laundering; Improved general purpose protective equipment (helmet protection and antivibration gloves); Nonplastic waste bags; Counterfeit parts detection methodology; Afloat automatic identification technology architecture. This list of potential projects for addressing capability gaps will be updated and prioritized over time, under the oversight of the NAVSUP Log R&D ESG, to ensure that funds allocated provide the highest return on investment consistent with Navy/NAVSUP goals and objectives. Title: Ammo Perfect Order Creation Module (APOCM) 0.175 Total Cost

Exhibit R2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 R1 Program Element (Number/Name) Navy Page 8 of 13 R1 Line #62 Enhanced the Ordinance Information Systems (OIS) ability to automatically process requisitions based on demand signals. Created a process of perfect order fulfillment to ordannce supply chain that did not previously exist. Title: Enhanced TET CDF Worked with the Department of Energy and DISA to identify, prototype and test tools that will enable tranfer of FACTS (Financial and Air Clearance Transportation System) transportation schedules and financial data to the SIPR TET (Transportation Exploration Tool). The CDS (DISA Cross Domain Management) will bridge between the unclassified FACTS TET module and the SIPR TET (Transportation Exploration Tool) to allow unclassified schedule data from IGC, the Coast Guard, Navy (JALIS), Marine Corps, and commercial providers as well as financial data from FACTS to be consumed for use in development of transportation solutions in STET (SIPR TET). Title: Philadelphia STEM Educational Training Supported STEM Educational Training efforts Title: Abrasive Blasting Personal Ensemble (PPE) 0.300 0.060 0.100 0.300

Exhibit R2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 R1 Program Element (Number/Name) Navy Page 9 of 13 R1 Line #62 Analyzed the deficiencies of the current abrasive blasting personal protective ensembles (ABPPE) and identified commercialofftheshelf (COTS) materials/designs to provide a reusable blasting ensemble with improved protection and reduced thermal burden. Title: LEED Warehouse Study Comprehensive study was developed to determine the most efficient means to a new Automated Mega Warehouse with rail operations. Title: etims Application Description: Projects for increasing Navy Logistics Productivity Share the development cost of upgrading the Enhanced Technical Information Mamangement Systems (etims) frontend Webbased GUI with the USAF. The specific upgrade will provide new efficiencies in the way the application processes data and presents it to the user. Specific deliverables will be "singlewindow" presentation graphical user interface (GUI), background processing improvements, and compatibility with new operating systems and browsers used by a variety of customers, both governmental and commercial. 0.256 0.060

Exhibit R2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 R1 Program Element (Number/Name) Title: Readiness through Logistics Solutions Any technological capability improving naval logistics in part or in its entirety... Through its Lifecycle, from concept to completion: "Cradle to grave" of a DoD/DON acquistion program of record (from manufacture, storage, delivery, use, maintenance and disposal). Any technological capability improving naval logistics in part or in its entirety... Through its Lifecycle, from concept to completion: "Cradle to grave" of a DoD/DON acquistion program of record (from manufacture, storage, delivery, use, maintenance and disposal). Title: Logistics Data Access and Information Sharing Capability to facilitate improved access and use of logistics data by both individual users and between IT systems. Capability includes, but is not limited to, enhanced Graphical User Interfaces (GUI) and webbased data services and other communitybased software tools and technologies that can enable broader exposure and sharing of logistics data based on customer requirements for data representation, metadata, format and delivery. Title: LifeCycleONE 0.200 0.165 0.200 0.212 Navy Page 10 of 13 R1 Line #62

Exhibit R2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 R1 Program Element (Number/Name) Navy Page 11 of 13 R1 Line #62 Continue development of a capability that will provide Program Managers with indicators that quantify the impact of Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability (RAM) cost drivers on their program's O&S costs. Title: Clothing Protection for the War Fighter A capability to assess commerical offtheshelf (COTS) items, identify/develop laboratory test methods to determine applicability of COTS items and address quality assurance measures to allow upgrades to uniform/protective clothing capabilities in a cost effective manner. Enhanced capabilities are required in the areas of thermal/flame threats, protective footwear as well as environmental and physical protection. A capability to correlate current material technologies and manufacturing processes with potential advanced technologies is required to mitigate costly/antiquated uniforms and manufacturing costs, work uniform catergory specifically. A capability to accurately identify the US Navy fit and define the proper "concept of fit" is required to streamline the uniform issue process, allow the sailor to purchase an off the rack uniform without costly alterations and enhance uniform size forecasting; resulting in having the "needed" sizes in stock. Utilitization of "virtual fit" processes will greatly improve the entire uniform management process. A capability to assess commerical offtheshelf (COTS) items, identify/develop laboratory test methods to determine applicability of COTS items and address quality assurance measures to allow upgrades to uniform/protective clothing capabilities in a cost effective manner. Enhanced capabilities are required in the areas of thermal/flame threats, protective footwear as well as environmental and physical protection. A capability to correlate current material technologies and manufacturing processes with potential advanced technologies is required to mitigate costly/antiquated uniforms and manufacturing costs, work uniform catergory specifically. A capability to accurately identify the US Navy fit and define the proper "concept of fit" is required to streamline the uniform issue process, allow the sailor to purchase an off the rack uniform without costly alterations and enhance uniform size forecasting; resulting in having the "needed" sizes in stock. Utilitization of "virtual fit" processes will greatly improve the entire uniform management process. C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions) 0.223 0.500 Accomplishments/Planned Programs Subtotals 0.891 0.948 0.912

Exhibit R2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions) Remarks R1 Program Element (Number/Name) D. Acquisition Strategy Ammo Perfect Order Creation Module (APOCM): This initiative will enhance the Ordnance Information Systems (OIS) ability to automatically process requsitions based on valid demand signals. APOCM will provide the integration of validated Fleet requirements, asset availability data and geographic location data relative to the load out point to automatically generate referral actions to ammunition stock points. APOCM will exploit the capabilities of the Global Ammunition Strategic Positioning Model (GASPM) and bring a level of perfect order fulfillment to the ordnance supply chain not realized to date. Enhanced TET CDF: Continue work with DOE and the DISA Cross Domain Management Office to identify, prototype & test tools that will enable transfer of FACTS unclassified transportation schedules and financial data to the SIPR TET for development of multimodal transportation solutions. Philadelphia STEM Educational Training: Funding provides new STEM initiatives to include: Logistics, Acquisition and Supply Systems Operations (LASSO) Summer Camps. Mobile Applications Programming Class: Students learn to program mobile applications for cell phones. Abrasive Blasting Personal Ensemble (PPE): Analyze the deficiencies of the current abrasive blasting personal protective ensembles (ABPPE) and identify commericalofftheshelf (COTS) materials/design to provide reusable blasting ensemble with improved protection and reduced thermal burden. LEED Warehouse Study: A comprehensive AE study will be developed to determine the most efficient means to a new automated Mega Warehouse with rail operations. The study will include alternatives, concepts, energy/green technology and equipment integration plan, detailed design scope of work cost estimates for each alternative and recommendation for most effective execution plan. E. Performance Metrics TBD Navy Page 12 of 13 R1 Line #62

Exhibit R4, RDT&E Schedule Profile: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 R1 Program Element (Number/Name) Navy Page 13 of 13 R1 Line #62