Ms. Patricia Hamburger

Transcription

1 Ms. Patricia Hamburger NAVSEA 05H Integrated Warfare Systems Engineering 1

2 Executing HSI Across the Spectrum SYSCOM Service: DoD: Governance: Lead: Officer Reports to Flag / Chief Engineer NAVSEA HSI IPT Charter:2010 Meets: Monthly Membership: SEA 05 Specifications & Standards SEA 05 Chief Systems Engineers SEA 05 Technical Domain Managers Competency Domain Leads Competency Domain Managers NSWCs NUWCs Program HSI IPTs HSI Mandate: NSI A Naval HSI Working Group Meets: Monthly Membership NAVAIR : NAVSEA SPAWAR MARCOR NAVSUP NAVFAC NPS OPNAV Safety Center Governance: Executive Steering Group: SES Working Group: Senior Civilian Leadership Rotates Annually Executive Steering Group MOA: 2003 Charter: aligned SESG, 2010 Joint HSI Working Group HSI Mandate: SNI D ONI Governance: Lead: Rotates Annually Executive Steering Group Charter:2004, 2008 SYSCOM Reps advise the Navy JHSIWG Rep and respond to taskers Meets: Quarterly HSI Mandate: DOD NDAA, Sec 231 Membership: Navy Marine Corps Army Air Force OSD DHS USCG Federal: DOD HFE TAG Meets: Biannually Membership: DoD NASA FAA DHS Academia Tech Societies Governance: Exec Committee MOA: SubTAGS 9/13/2012 HSI Working Groups developed common HSI processes, tools, standards, and workforce education to deliver Naval systems that maximize performance at the lowest Total Ownership Cost. 2 Information exchange and integration between the seams is key! 2

3 Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) HSI Programs All NPS HSI programs open to US Military, Federal Government Civilians, and US Defense Contractors (on a space available basis) Graduate Certificate in Human Systems Integration Resident and Distance Learning Four graduate courses, one course per quarter Master of Human Systems Integration Distance Learning 16 graduate courses, two years, two courses per quarter Master of Science in Human Systems Integration Resident full-time only 32 graduate courses, two years, four courses per quarter Human Systems Integration Workshops Range in length from one to five days Conducted at NPS or on location For more information, contact: Larry Shattuck lgshattu@nps.edu (831)

4 Technical Authority and Certification Technical authority provides independent assessment of programs and projects through the selection of individuals at delegated levels of authority. These individuals are the authorities who are responsible for a systematic approach to identify, analyze, and control hazards throughout the life cycle of Naval Warfare Systems. Certification. Warfare systems, combat systems, and element certifications formally confirm meeting a standard and/or specification. Warfare systems certification shall attest to system readiness in a bounded statement of risk, via the non-compliance process. Deployment readiness shall be established to an acceptable level of confidence with all risks mitigated or deemed acceptable. Certification is strictly based on Objective Quality Evidence (OQE). Certification is strictly based on Objective Quality Evidence (OQE). Artifacts that provide the information and status of requirements and whether they have, or have not, been satisfied, reviewed, and/or accepted by the applicable Technical Authority. Any statement of fact, quantitative or qualitative, pertaining to the quality of a product or service based on observations, measurements or tests that can be verified. OQE provides evidence that the system complies with established requirements as well as certification criteria. OQE is the basis of certification. 9/13/2012 4

5 Naval Warfare Systems Certification Policy (NWSCP) Warfare Systems Certification NWSCP NAVAIRINST SPAWARINST NAVSEAINST Approved 18 July 2005 Updated 2011 Multi-SYSCOM Policy NAVAIRINST SPAWARINST NAVSEAINST Phase I Supersedes G&PP Policy Mandate: CFFC Z MAY 04 - COMFLTFORCOM C5IMP POLICY (Superseded by COMFLTFORCOM POLICY B, Signed Oct 2008) Assigns NAVSEA 06 (now SEA 05H) Certification Responsibility and Authority for Platforms and Strike Groups Formally establishes the process and provides the required steps for certifying Warfare Systems for Navy Surface Ships for Installation and Deployment, providing required information to support FLT C5IMP Baseline Decisions Primary method for ensuring Warfare Systems are fully developed, mature, reliable, and have completed System and Integration Testing prior to delivery and operational use during Deployment Provides Guidance for Ship Level Warfare System Technical Certification and identifies the specific information that key Stakeholders must provide in support of the Platform Certification Process New Version Signed out August

6 Warfare System Certification Criteria NAVSEAINST , Naval Warfare System Certification Policy (NWSCP), Revision A FINAL Warfare System Certification Readiness Review (WSCRR) Warfare System Installation Assessment (WSIA) Warfare System Certification Decision (WSCD) Criteria 1: No open R1 Trouble Reports (TRs). X X X Criteria 2: Work-Arounds, Limitations, Restrictions, and Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTP) Aggregation X X Assessment indicates personnel can perform the mission. Criteria 3: Warfare systems have successfully passed an operationally stressful endurance test. X X Criteria 4: Interoperability. X X X Criteria 5: Shipboard documentation in place. X X Criteria 6: Training Program developed and delivered. X X Criteria 7: Weapon System Explosive Safety Review Board (WSESRB) concurrence. X X X Criteria 8: Navigation System Certification (NAVCERT). X X Criteria 9: Electromagnetic Fields Radiation Hazards (RADHAZ) Abatement on Ship Certification. X X Criteria 10: Ship Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Certification. X X Criteria 11: Combat System Certification. X X X Criteria 12: C4I Certification. X X X Criteria 13: Aviation Facilities Certification (AVCERT). X X Criteria 14: Precision Approach and Landing Systems (PALS) Certification. X X Criteria 15: Element Certification for Non-Combat System and Non-C4I Elements. X X X Criteria 16: PSMD and SMD adequately reflect any changes to Manpower billet requirements. X Criteria 17: No observed degradation of warfare systems capabilities and performance post-installation. Criteria 18: Warfare systems element configurations identified and controlled. X X X Criteria 19: Test personnel, facilities, equipment and procedures ready to begin warfare systems level testing for X interoperability and stressful endurance. Criteria 20: Signed Warfare System Certification Plan (WSCP). X X X WSCRR WSIA WSCD X Note: Threat assessment is required Criteria 17, and details from this assessment will be included in the Naval WS Certification Message 9/13/2012 HSI Related DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for Public Release; Warfare Systems Certification Readiness Review (WSCRR) Warfare Systems Installation Authorization (WSIA) (Installation Decision Criteria) Warfare Systems Certification Decision (WSCD) (Deployment Decision Criteria) 6

7 From the past to Common Display System (CDS) Mission: AN/UYA- AN/UYQ- AN/UYQ Production/Support Part of Navy s Implementation of an Open Architecture Way Ahead for Surface Combat Systems Display Real-Time, Tactical Command-and-Control Information Aboard the Navy s Surface Ships Description: A Family of Common Display Systems that Will Conform to Open Architecture Computing Environment (OACE) Technologies and Standards and Incorporate Human Systems Integration (HSI) Design Principles Platforms: (Current and Planned) Ships: CG Mod, DDG 113+, DDG Mod, Aegis Ashore, CVNs, LSD, LHA, DDG 1000 FMS: Australian AWD and Japan OJ-827 OJ-836 Employment: Provides Single Solution to Integrated Platform Mission Critical and Mission Essential Display Requirements Simultaneously Displays Information From Multiple Security Domains (DDG-1000 only) Supports a Multi-Mission Concept of Operations by Allowing Watch Standers to Access Multiple Applications from a Single Display Console Production/Support

8 HSI Challenges Understanding that Human Performance is a Part of Total System Performance The system can only perform to the speed and accuracy of its weakest link. In some cases, the limiting factor is human cognitive throughput. This must be an integral part of any solid systems engineering process. COTS/GOTS Integration and impact on Interoperability, Training, Operations, Maintenance, and Logistics We can no longer delude ourselves into thinking that we can Frankenstein together a bunch of misc. parts and hope that the system will magically work as intended. Interoperability, training, and a host of maintenance and operations issues will follow. We rely upon industry to provide appropriate systems integration. Realistic Manning Numbers and Operator Workload Workload demands flow from the system design and levels of automation provided. These in turn drive manpower requirements. Analysis is needed to ascertain what manpower is truly needed, and industry needs to tell the customer when a manpower requirement is unrealistic. Usability as a System Attribute Certification requires that The system meets usability requirements under realistic operating conditions in the intended environment including operations by Fleet representative operators and technicians. This criterion recognizes the central role of the operators and maintenance personnel on Navy systems and the severe consequences of a failure to have an effective and efficient interface between the human users and the hardware and software components of the system. "Usability" represents the effectiveness and efficiency of those interfaces.

9 Ms. Patricia Hamburger NAVSEA 05H Integrated Warfare Systems Engineering 9