Oregon GovSpace. The place where state agencies, employees and their partners build online communities.



Similar documents
State of Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services Building Codes Division. Oregon epermitting

OREGON INFORMATION RESOURCES STRENGTHEN. OPTIMIZE. INNOVATE.

Information Technology Managed Service Provider (IT MSP) for Hourly and Project Based IT Services. State of Oregon

Enterprise Exchange . Category: Enterprise IT Management Initiatives. State: Nebraska

2009 NASCIO Recognition Awards Nomination. A. Title: Sensitive Data Protection with Endpoint Encryption. Category: Information Security and Privacy

State of Kansas Information Technology Vendor Management Program Executive Summary

A Technology Infrastructure for Standards Consortia

Enterprise Asset Management Customer Utility Board Charter

Establishing Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management in a Shared Service Environment

How To Improve The Corpsmember Recruitment System

Multi-Jurisdictional Provision of Audio, Video, and Web Conferencing Services

Statement. Mr. Paul A. Brinkley Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Business Transformation. Before

Appeals Case Management System Project. Scope Management Plan. November 20, 2014

How To Manage Records At The Exceeda Agency

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MANUAL

Three Strategies for Implementing HR in the Cloud

2009 NASCIO Recognition Award Nomination State of Georgia

Three Fundamental Techniques To Maximize the Value of Your Enterprise Data

Department of Administration Portfolio Management System 1.3 June 30, 2010

Re: Electronic Standards for Public Health Information Exchange

Section 4 MANAGEMENT CONTROLS AND PROCESSES. Section 4

Annexure-A (Qualifications & Job Description with Roles & Responsibilities) Job Description

State of Minnesota IT Governance Framework

How To Write A Workforce Strategy

BALEFIRE GLOBAL OPEN DATA STRATEGIC SERVICES

I. Project Identification

Corporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: June 26, 2006 NO: C013 COUNCIL-IN-COMMITTEE. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: June 15 th, 2006

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...5

Data Integration Initiative Semi Annual Report April State of North Carolina Office of the State Controller

Draft Document STATE OF MICHIGAN. SACWIS Planning Department of Human Services Strategic Implementation Plan: Project Staffing

BUSINESS PLAN

The Budget: Centralizing State IT Project Management

Florida Statewide ITS Strategic Plan. Integration of ITS into the MPO Transportation Planning Process Issue Paper

Cybersecurity in the States 2012: Priorities, Issues and Trends

Major IT Projects: Continue Expanding Oversight and Strengthen Accountability

Enhance State IT Contract Expertise

A Privacy Officer s Guide to Providing Enterprise De-Identification Services. Phase I

Strategic Plan

Brief Description: Reorganizing and streamlining central service functions, powers, and duties of state government.

2011 NASCIO Nomination Business Improvement and Paperless Architecture Initiative. Improving State Operations: Kentucky

The Role of the State Higher Education Board in Teacher Education and Assessment: Initiatives of the Arizona Board of Regents

Rationale for Declaring Microsoft Exchange as the Statewide Server Software Standard

building and sustaining productive working relationships p u b l i c r e l a t i o n s a n d p r o c u r e m e n t

Concept of Operations for Line of Business Initiatives

Oregon Employment Department. Unemployment Insurance Call Center Upgrade. May 28, Submitted by: Troy Rutten, CIO Oregon Employment Department

Final. North Carolina Procurement Transformation. Governance Model March 11, 2011

Migrating and consolidating even the simplest of data

Commonwealth of Virginia Information Technology Transformation Initiative

City of Conway Information Technology Strategic Plan - Executive Summary

The Baltimore County Public Schools Technology Plan

IT PROJECT GOVERNANCE GUIDE

Professional Level Public Health Informatician

BUILDING A HIGH PERFORMING SYSTEM. A business improvement plan for the Department for Education and Child Development

Nebraska Enterprise Content Management System

Project Governance Plan Next Generation Project Oregon Military Department, Office of Emergency Management, Program (The OEM 9-1-1)

MNLARS Project Audit Checklist

The Future of Census Bureau Operations

NATIONAL CENTER FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INFORMATICS (CPE)

DIGITAL STRATEGY SUMMARY

One Hundred Seventh Congress of the United States of America

Office of the City Administrator OCA (AE)

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

Department of Technology Services

State of Florida ELECTRONIC RECORDKEEPING STRATEGIC PLAN. January 2010 December 2012 DECEMBER 31, 2009

Statewide Longitudinal Data System Quarterly Project Oversight Report: Comprehensive Review For January March 2015

Enterprise Project and Portfolio Management Implementation Project. Update to the ETS Customer Utility Board Julie Pearson May 27, 2015

Strategic Solutions that Make Your Work Easier. Projects Made Easier Decisions Made Easier Business Made Easier

Secure Wireless LAN. Michigan Department of Information Technology

Contents. Contract Number (VA CAI) Contingent Labor Statement of Requirements (SOR) Template v 2.0 January 1, 2014

Improving Government Project Charter Human Resource Information System

Michigan Criminal Justice Information Network (MiCJIN) State of Michigan Department of Information Technology & Michigan State Police

State of Montana. Office Of Public Instruction IT Strategic Plan Executive Summary

Executive Summary - North Carolina Statewide Technical Architecture

MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES

The Case Study of CRM

Oregon Department of Human Services Central and Shared Service Programs

NIST Cloud Computing Program Activities

Department of Information Technology

FR104 - Maximize the Impact of E-Learning Programs

Leafy Green Inspection Tracking System

Why do Project Fail? 42% 37% 27% 26% 24% 24% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% IBM Software Group Rational software. Source: AberdeenGroup, August 2006

ID Task Name Time Pred

Project Audit & Review Checklist. The following provides a detailed checklist to assist the PPO with reviewing the health of a project:

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT MANUAL TRANSMITTAL SHEET Data Administration and Management (Public)

Cloud Computing: Implications and Guidelines for Records Management in Kentucky State Government

Project Management for Implementing the Smart Grid By Power System Engineering, Inc. Abstract PM Methodology Using a Repeatable Project Management

The following NIMS FAQ was prepared by NIMS on-line, which has additional information at

Enterprise IT Portfolio Governance and Management Model

Agilysys rguest Analyze Solution

QA Engagement Models. Managed / Integrated Test Center A Case Study

NASCIO 2014 State IT Recognition Awards

HR Optimization in the Public Sector. kpmg.com

Information Technology Strategic Plan Final Presentation

Human Services Decision Support System Data and Knowledge Management

E-Business: How Businesses Use Information Systems

The State of Oregon. Department of Procurement Services Issues the Following

Information Technology Strategic Plan

Delaware s Project Management Office

Final Report. Audit of the Project Management Framework. December 2014

STATEMENT OF. Dr. David McClure Associate Administrator Office of Citizen Services and Innovative Technologies General Services Administration

Transcription:

Oregon GovSpace The place where state agencies, employees and their partners build online communities. Sponsor Department of Administrative Services: Wallace Rogers, E-Government Program Manager Digital Government: Government to Government June 3, 2009 State of Oregon http://www.oregon.gov/das/eispd/egov

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The agencies of the State of Oregon operate in a loosely federated business model. Challenges over the last several years have led many to conclude that a new capacity for collaborative multi-agency planning and action was needed to address these challenges. The use of collaboration and social networking (Web 2.0) software-enabled tools had been introduced to agencies by early adopters and by younger professionals. These tools were being used in several agencies but not across agency or jurisdictional boundaries. Further, agencies had concerns about allowing expanded use of their systems by other agencies since their systems contained proprietary and sensitive information. Nor was the newly established Oregon State Data Center prepared to develop and host a suite of collaborative software for all agencies to use to support collaborative multi-agency planning and subsequent action. Their agenda was full with operational matters and the application service provision was beyond their scope of operations. In October 2007 Oregon s Department of Administrative Services, Enterprise Information Strategy and Policy Division (EISPD) weighed the business needs for multiagency collaboration and planning and the range of alternatives, and decided the appropriate course of action was to pilot a vendor-hosted, web-enabled suite of collaboration software. EISPD s E-Government Program manager negotiated a contract with a highly-rated Portland, Oregon-based vendor, Jive Software, to host and provide a Software as a Service (SaaS) pilot service. Two-hundred (200) state staff and business partners participated in that first successful six-month pilot completed in September 2008. Since that first pilot experience, word-of-mouth promotion continues to create increased demand for this collaborative, multi-agency/multi-jurisdictional planning forum. The contract has been extended and the number of participants continues to increase at a rate of approximately 20% per month. Current participants include over 1,200 individuals representing over 100 different state agencies, local jurisdictions, and non-government organizations and in one case, members of a national industry group, the Coalition of Geospatial Organizations (COGO). This level of adoption is already having a positive impact as even more candidate areas for multi-agency collaboration and planning emerge. Deployment of this web-based technology has prompted the agencies of the State of Oregon and their business partners to explore and refine cross-agency collaboration and government to government planning practices on a scale not previously possible. The expectations for this effort have been exceeded. The State of Oregon has created an ongoing forum for multi-agency collaboration, planning, and communication now called Oregon GovSpace. The state has gained the valuable experience needed to gauge the feasibility and potential return-on-investment of other future Software as a Service opportunities. Oregon GovSpace has opened the door to new possibilities in multi-agency collaboration, planning, and action. 2

DESCRIPTION Problem Statement: The agencies of the State of Oregon have planned and acted independently throughout the state s history. As the complexity and interdependence of government operations has increased, the need for methods and forums for collaborative planning and action (in person and virtual) also increased. With the emergence of software-enabled social networking tools in the corporate environment and in private lives of state staff, various agencies have adopted these tools to support their internal planning and action. Barriers, Challenges, Opportunities: None of the agencies using various forms of collaborative software to support collaboration and planning were able to allow their systems to be used by all agencies, since individual agency systems contained sensitive information that needed to be kept confidential for a variety of reasons. Also, the culture of state government in Oregon did not easily enable or support cross-agency collaboration as a standard practice. Hosting a social networking solution at the newly formed State Data Center was considered however, other operational priorities were ranked higher at that time. Issues or Problem Context: At the same time, those taking an enterprise view believed there was a compelling need for a service that would be available to all agencies for multi-agency collaboration. The State CIO and E-Government manager identified the need to connect agencies using collaborative planning methods and webenabled software tools. Also, the return-on-investment of a dedicated system to provide a forum and replicable model for collaborative, multi-agency planning, communication and action could not be evaluated without relevant experience. Assessment and Decision Process: An evaluation of a range of options for a pilot offering was conducted. The evaluation determined that deployment of an externally provided service was necessary and appropriate. It would allow volunteer participants to experience and test-drive the functionality and capabilities of an enterprise class collaboration tool directly. without a substantial front-end investment and ongoing expenses for software and infrastructure. Evaluators also believed a voluntary pilot experience would prove to be more beneficial in the long run. If successful, participants would serve as promoters of the service and subsequent collaborative, multi-agency planning methodologies. A decision was made to focus on a collaborative software suite of tools provided as Software as a Service. Solution Selection: The contractor, Jive Software, was selected through the state s existing portal services provider, based on several central criteria. The use of a single vendor with the expertise and training capabilities to introduce the practices and tools on an enterprise basis was a fundamental feature of the agreement making the pilot effort feasible. Jive Software was also capable of incorporating system requirements that participants identified during the pilot, by making near real-time updates to the operating environment. 3

That approach had the additional benefit of allowing the participating agencies to experience collaborative, multi-agency planning and action without the requirement for a large commitment of money upfront, and/or a dedicated technical infrastructure and ongoing maintenance costs. State leaders and agency participants were then able to focus on the experience of the planning forum, without having to also consider a significant and ongoing cost base. The minimal administrative costs were absorbed at first by volunteer members from the various forums. Later, one administrative staff member from the E-Government Program was tasked to spend half of their time to ensure that administrative, policy, and security practices were consistently applied. Training was provided by the vendor as part of the agreement. The training curriculum was consistently upgraded based on the experiences of the participants and requests received from participants during the pilot effort. Solution and Major Solution Elements: In October of 2007, DAS E-Government Program manager contracted with Jive Software to provide a suite of vendor-hosted, web-enabled collaborative (Web 2.0) software for a six-month pilot of two-hundred (200) seats. This pilot was conducted to estimate the feasibility and demand for such a tool. The joint pilot was envisioned as an opportunity for both parties (Jive and the State of Oregon) to explore the use, practical application, and organizational benefit of an enterprise-level Software as a Service (SaaS) solution for collaboration and social business networking in a state government setting. The selection method and contract met Oregon s procurement criteria as defined in state law and administrative rule. Project Management, Definition and Control: The original threshold of two-hundred (200) prototypical volunteers was reached very quickly after the introduction of the service in October 2007. While the E-Government Program manager served as Project Manager and operational sponsor, participants in the pilot held various project-related roles. On a practical level, throughout this effort teams were relatively free to function as they chose with very little oversight from the system providers at Jive Software or the State of Oregon. The State of Oregon has been and remains accountable for ensuring that access to and use of the system is appropriate, although individual users continue to be subject to the state s acceptable use policy. On a periodic basis, system performance and the growth in the use of the collaboration software suite is reported to the state s leadership, decision-makers, users of the system, and potential users of the system. A governance body comprised of the heads of stakeholder agencies oversees the continuing development of the service. Policies, guidelines, and necessary terms and conditions for use of the system have been developed to be in line with the state s acceptable use policy, and through the harvesting of participant s experiences, and other available examples from around the world. 4

Length of Time in Operation: The service, now called Oregon GovSpace has been in use since the 200-user pilot phase was completed in September 2008. To accommodate the emerging demand, the original contract was extended and the number of seats expanded, to allow many more state government-oriented teams to form naturally using Oregon GovSpace as their principle on-line collaboration forum. SIGNIFICANCE In General: As a practical matter, agencies have begun to appreciate how the use of Oregon GovSpace lessens the need for expensive and time consuming terrestrial /in person meetings. They have found that concept development in a web-accessible 24x7 forum provides a far more efficient and cost effective planning medium. Anecdotally, it appears that when meetings are held on these concepts, the nature of the meetings shifts from concept development, to a review and finalization of work product, and to mutually planning next-steps. Policy, Strategy and Goal Alignment: Because of Oregon GovSpace, a baseline for the calculation of return-on-investment is now more feasible. In the near term, there is no plan to shift to another service provider. In the mid-term (18-24 months), Oregon s E-Government program services are expected to transition to a new operating model. The best long term model for the provision of collaboration tools will be evaluated as part of this effort. A variety of policies and guidelines about the appropriate use and optimization of Oregon GovSpace have been created. More are on the way. In a state government setting policy guiding the use of Web 2.0 tools must address a range of requirements of law including: public meetings; public records and records retention; e-discovery; data classification; and acceptable use. The terms and conditions of use now spell out the agreement made by each participant during the online registration process. Some policy issues are still under development including whether a hosted SaaS collaboration environment can adequately protect level 3 and level 4 classified data. The use of Oregon GovSpace is focused on collaboration, knowledge sharing, planning, communication and subsequent action. It is not currently considered a permanent storage location for documents and artifacts. Those are to be housed in an appropriate agency repository. BENEFIT OF THE PROJECT Impact of the Project: The rate of growth in the use of the system has remained at approximately 20% per month since the end of the pilot phase. Over 1,200 participants from approximately 100 different states, local and national organizations use Oregon GovSpace. The continued growth rate in use is remarkable given that participation has remained voluntary 5

and promotion continues almost exclusively by word-of-mouth. Participants include: managers and staff from various state agencies; participants from other governmental jurisdictions in Oregon; vendor partners; and even members of the national industry group, the Coalition of Geospatial Organizations (COGO). Agencies have welcomed the light weight, easy to use project collaboration capabilities. For project specific communication and increased visibility, stakeholders can view a multi-project dashboard; see task assignments, due dates, overdue tasks, issue tracking, versioned project documents, and a calendar of project milestones. A sampling of projects using Oregon GovSpace include: the Statewide Automated Child Welfare Program; the Board of Property Tax Appeals (conducting state and county property tax appeals); personnel coordinators; information sharing between the various parks; a group focused on development of an e-courts initiative; the Employment Department and Community Colleges collaborating on workforce development; a group working to create an Oregon Fire Fighter Certification portal; multiple e-commerce store projects for various agencies; a crossagency team focused on the development of an enterprise architecture; a group undertaking the development of an Oregon Wireless Inter-operability Network project to consolidate four major public safety radio networks; a group focused on sustainability across state government; a group from the Public Employees Benefit Board and Oregon Educators Benefit Board; and multiple training and information sharing efforts. Of note, the executive team overseeing the allocation of state and Federal stimulus funds across Oregon is now using Oregon GovSpace to undertake their vital work. The range of beneficiaries of the collaboration and planning conducted in Oregon GovSpace includes: executives; subject matter experts; stakeholders; vendor partners; other governmental jurisdictions; the Oregon State Legislature. Before Oregon GovSpace was initiated collaboration across agency boundaries was seen as a laborious, multi-week or multi-month process conducted largely via face to face meetings. Collaboration via Oregon GovSpace is now seen as a way for agencies to accelerate multiagency and multi-jurisdictional work. Agencies are aware that Oregon GovSpace can be used to avoid the delays associated with sequential face-to-face meetings. Software-enabled social networking does not eliminate the need for face-to-face meetings, but does tend to make those meetings, when held, more productive since much more is accomplished in advance of the meeting. Participants have noted that concepts require shorter development time because of the 24x7 opportunity for collaboration. 6

The long term impact of the wholesale use of a web-enabled social networking and collaboration suite is efficiency in conducting multi-agency and multi-jurisdictional planning and action. That efficiency has made such planning more plausible and thus the number of candidate areas is increasing. Project Alignment with NASCIO Priorities: Oregon GovSpace aligns with many of NASCIO s State CIO priorities including: Priority Strategies, Management Processes and Solutions Consolidation: Oregon GovSpace consolidates the support infrastructure needed for collaborative, multi-agency planning, and action. Shared Services: Oregon GovSpace provides an essential shared service in support of cross-agency collaboration for all agencies. Budget and Cost Control: Oregon GovSpace produces a variety of cost control and optimization practices, the most significant of which is supplanting the need for costly travel, and travel-related expenses with the potential for 24x7 webenabled collaboration, conserving both time and money. Security: Oregon GovSpace enables collaboration within the context of a secure Sungard-hosted environment. Green IT: Oregon GovSpace directly reduces the need for travel and other energy-costly practices. Transparency: Oregon GovSpace provides an essential tool in creating the transparency needed to accomplish root cause / root solution analysis, planning and action. Governance: Oregon GovSpace provides the forum and practices necessary to establish and sustain a viable multi-agency (enterprise) governance model. Priority Technologies, Applications and Tools Web 2.0: Oregon GovSpace is the embodiment of the benefit and potential that can fall from Web 2.0 capabilities. Green IT: Oregon GovSpace provides a forum for collaborative planning and action that directly promotes sustainable practices. Mobile workforce enablement: Oregon GovSpace, because it is made available on a 24x7 basis via the Web, allows collaboration from anywhere any time. Outcomes Transformation of Government: Participants now have the experience needed to successfully plan and act in a multi-agency virtual setting. While the business model of Oregon state government is still decentralized, in practice a culture has been established for effective multi-agency planning and action. A fundamental shift has occurred that is now bearing other, more substantive opportunities. 7