What if BAU would come true?



Similar documents
Life Domain: Labour Market and Working Conditions Goal Dimension: Preserving Natural Capital Measurement Dimension: Environmental Pollution by Economy

Updated development of global greenhouse gas emissions 2013

41 T Korea, Rep T Netherlands T Japan E Bulgaria T Argentina T Czech Republic T Greece 50.

PUBLIC VS. PRIVATE HEALTH CARE IN CANADA. Norma Kozhaya, Ph.D Economist, Montreal economic Institute CPBI, Winnipeg June 15, 2007

PUBLIC & PRIVATE HEALTH CARE IN CANADA

Hong Kong s Health Spending 1989 to 2033

Size and Development of the Shadow Economy of 31 European and 5 other OECD Countries from 2003 to 2015: Different Developments

International Natural Gas Tariff Comparison for Residential and Industrial Customers December 2011

ERMInE Database. Presentation by Nils Flatabø SINTEF Energy Research. ERMInE Workshop 2 - Northern Europe Oslo, 1. November 2006

187/ December EU28, euro area and United States GDP growth rates % change over the previous quarter

relating to household s disposable income. A Gini Coefficient of zero indicates

99/ June EU28, euro area and United States GDP growth rates % change over the previous quarter

Energy prices in the EU Household electricity prices in the EU rose by 2.9% in 2014 Gas prices up by 2.0% in the EU

EUF STATISTICS. 31 December 2013

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

NEW PASSENGER CAR REGISTRATIONS BY ALTERNATIVE FUEL TYPE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION 1 Quarter

Foreign Taxes Paid and Foreign Source Income INTECH Global Income Managed Volatility Fund

CO2 BASED MOTOR VEHICLE TAXES IN THE EU IN 2015

Labour Force Survey 2014 Almost 10 million part-time workers in the EU would have preferred to work more Two-thirds were women

UTX Europe V2 - Enhancements

FUSIONS Food waste data set for EU-28. New Estimates and Environmental Impact

How To Understand Factoring

International Hints and Tips

Renewable Energy Certificate systems in Europe (the path to international trade)

13 th Economic Trends Survey of the Architects Council of Europe

TOWARDS PUBLIC PROCUREMENT KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS. Paulo Magina Public Sector Integrity Division

CO2 BASED MOTOR VEHICLE TAXES IN THE EU IN 2016

ERASMUS+ MASTER LOANS

Crystal Clear Contract Services Limited Application Form CIS/Sole Trader

FEDERATION EUROPEENNE DES MEDECINS SALARIES EUROPEAN FEDERATION OF SALARIED DOCTORS

Drink Driving in Europe

168/ November At risk of poverty or social exclusion 2 rate in the EU28, (% of total population)

Higher education institutions as places to integrate individual lifelong learning strategies

Delegation in human resource management

Health Care in Crisis

Annex 2C International comparisons of gas and electricity prices

Taxation trends in the European Union EU27 tax ratio fell to 39.3% of GDP in 2008 Steady decline in top corporate income tax rate since 2000

Alcohol Consumption in Ireland A Report for the Health Service Executive

Exercise 39. The Euro. At the end of this exercise you will:

1. Perception of the Bancruptcy System Perception of In-court Reorganisation... 4

OVERVIEW OF PURCHASE AND TAX INCENTIVES FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES IN THE EU

PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY WORKERS

Appendix. Appendix Figure 1: Trends in age-standardized cardiometabolic (CVD and diabetes) mortality by country.

Insurance corporations and pension funds in OECD countries

Wind Power in Germany in 2014

CO 2 -based Motor Vehicle Tax

ERASMUS+ MASTER LOANS

SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT! CONFIRMATION

Expenditure on Health Care in the UK: A Review of the Issues

WP1 Task 1 The Drivers of Electricity Demand and Supply

Trends in the European Investment Fund Industry. in the First Quarter of 2016

INTERNATIONAL TRACKED POSTAGE SERVICE

193/ December Hourly labour costs in the EU28 Member States, 2012 (in )

EUROPE 2020 TARGETS: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

EU study on company car taxation: presentation of the main results

Social insurance, private insurance and social protection. The example of health care systems in some OECD countries

Transport Infographics

Expenditure and Outputs in the Irish Health System: A Cross Country Comparison

CENTRAL BANK OF CYPRUS

International comparisons of obesity prevalence

Towards a Cloud Computing Strategy for Europe Digital Assembly, June 17, Brussels.

CO1.2: Life expectancy at birth

Reported Road Accident Statistics

Implementing the cooperation mechanisms of the RES directive current status and open questions

Preventing fraud and corruption in public procurement

The Economics of Regulated Prices: mapping the issue

Price setting in the electricity markets within the EU single market

Health Care Systems: An International Comparison. Strategic Policy and Research Intergovernmental Affairs May 2001

NERI Quarterly Economic Facts Summer Distribution of Income and Wealth

Car tax refund on export

What Proportion of National Wealth Is Spent on Education?

Family benefits Information about health insurance country. Udbetaling Danmark Kongens Vænge Hillerød. A. Personal data

Electricity and natural gas price statistics 1

Waste. Copenhagen, 3 rd September Almut Reichel Project Manager Sustainable consumption and production & waste, European Environment Agency

Environmentally sound technologies in Poland market overview and business opportunities for SMEs

Planned Healthcare in Europe for Lothian residents

10. European Union. (a) Past trends

Taxation of tobacco products in the European Union. Frank Van Driessche DG Taxation and Customs Union May 2006

How To Tax On Pension Income For Older People In European Countries

Broadband and i2010: The importance of dynamic competition to market growth

Cash machine withdrawal in the EU (+Norway and Iceland)

Reporting practices for domestic and total debt securities

Il/network/italiano/ Risorse digitali e strumenti colaborativi per le Scienze del'antichità/ Venezia'3'o*obre'2014' Emiliano Degl Innocenti

First estimate for 2014 Euro area international trade in goods surplus bn 24.2 bn surplus for EU28

Computing our Future Computer programming and coding in schools in Europe. Anja Balanskat, Senior Manager European Schoolnet

How does Internet Usage Change in Turkey? An Assessment on Internet Users

STATISTICS FOR THE FURNITURE INDUSTRY AND TRADE

Finance information for postgraduate students

Trends in the European Investment Fund Industry. in the Second Quarter of Results for the first half of 2014

European Fitness Market in million. members. 48,000 facilices. billion euro revenues. 400,000 employees

Transcription:

What if BAU would come true? Scanning transport CO 2 emissions in the EU Petri Tapio & Jyrki Luukkanen Finland Futures Research Centre

The approach Introduction of general trends on EU15 level GDP Transport CO 2 emissions Historical CO 2 data by country 196-1999 Future extrapolations CO 2 by country 2-212 Historical transport CO 2 intensity of the economy by country CO 2 /GDP 196-1999 Future extrapolation of intensity by country 2-212 Comparison with USA and Japan history 196-1999 2-212 Discussion

CO 2 emissions by sector in EU15 1985-1999 12 CO 2 Emissions /1 6 tn 1 Electricity & Heat Production Transport 8 6 Household & Commerce Industry 4 Energy Branch 2 1985 199 1995 2 Source of Data: Eurostat 2; 22

GDP, passenger traffic, freight and traffic CO 2 in EU15 in 197-2, scanning for 212 Source: Eurostat Real GDPmer, 35 passenger transport and freight transport/ 3 (index 197=1); 25 CO 2 emissions from transport/ 2 (index 1985=15) 15 GDP mer R 2 =,991 Passenger km CO2 from transport Freight (tnkm) GDPmer 1 5 CO 2 R 2 =,977 Freight R 2 =,954 Passenger km R 2 =,994 197 198 199 2 212

Transport CO 2 emissions by country EU15 Big countries France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK Little central and southern countries Austria, Belgium, Greece, Ireland, Luxemburg, Netherlands, Portugal Nordic countries Denmark, Finland, Sweden

History 196-1999: Big EU countries Transport CO 2 emissions / Tg 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 196 197 198 199 2 Germany France UK Italy Spain Time/ Year

Future 212 big countries Transport CO 2 emissions / Tg 25 2 15 1 Linear extrapolation - big EU countries R 2 =,9762 R 2 =,9912 R 2 =,971 R 2 =,9958 R 2 =,9446 Germany France UK Italy Spain 5 196 197 198 199 2 212

Future 212 big countries Transport CO 2 emissions / Tg 25 2 15 Second order polynomial extrapolation - big EU countries R 2 =,984 R 2 =,984 R 2 =,9912 R 2 =,9959 Germany UK France Italy 1 R 2 =,975 Spain 5 196 197 198 199 2 212

History: Little central and southern countries (196-1999) Transport CO 2 emissions / Tg 35 3 Transport CO 2 in the little central and southern EU countries Netherlands 25 Belgium 2 Greece 15 Aus tria Portugal 1 Ireland 5 Luxembourg 196 197 198 199 2 Time/Year

Future 212 little central and southern countries Transport CO 2 emissions / Tg 4 3 2 1 Linear extrapolation - little central and southern EU countries R 2 =,9731 R 2 =,9822 R 2 =,9835 R 2 =,9795 R 2 =,9434 R 2 =,8785 Netherlands Belgium Greece Austria Portugal Ireland Luxembourg R 2 =,886 196 197 198 199 2 212

Transport CO 2 emissions / Tg Future 212 little central and southern countries Second order polynomial extrapolation - little central and southern EU countries 4 3 R 2 =,9731 R 2 =,9865 R 2 =,9885 Netherlands Belgium Greece 2 R 2 =,9839 R 2 =,9798 Austria Portugal 1 R 2 =,8923 R 2 =,9833 Ireland Luxembourg 196 197 198 199 2 212

History 196-1999: Nordic countries Source IEA 3 Transport CO 2 emissions / Tg 2 Sweden Denmark Finland 1 196 197 198 199 2 Time/ Year

Future 212 nordic countries Linear extrapolation - nordic EU countries Transport CO 2 emissions / Tg 3 2 R 2 =,9543 R 2 =,985 Sweden Denmark Finland 1 R 2 =,9742 196 197 198 199 2 212

Future 212 nordic countries Second order polynomial extrapolation - nordic EU countries 3 Transport CO 2 emissions / Tg 2 1 R 2 =,9755 R 2 =,9832 R 2 =,9462 Sweden Finland Denmark 196 197 198 199 2 212

History 196-1999: USA, Japan and EU15 Transport CO 2 in USA, EU15 and Japan in 196-1999 Transport CO 2 emissions / Tg 2 15 1 USA EU15 Japan 5 196 197 198 199 2 Time / Year

Future 212 - EU15, USA and Japan Transport CO 2 in USA, EU15 and Japan in 196-1999; linear extrapolation for 2-212 2 Transport CO 2 emissions / Tg R 2 =,9329 15 USA 1 R 2 =,9916 EU15 5 R 2 =,9858 Japan 196 197 198 199 2 212

Future 212 - EU15, USA and Japan Transport CO 2 in USA, EU15 and Japan in 196-1999; second order polynomial extrapolation for 2-212 2 Transport CO 2 emissions / Tg R 2 =,9519 15 USA R 2 =,9921 1 EU15 5 R 2 =,9858 Japan 196 197 198 199 2 212

Transport CO 2 intensity of the economy Grouping as above CO 2 /GDP by country History 196-1999 Future 2-212

History 196-1999: Big countries Transport CO 2 intensity of the economy 196-1999 - big EU countries,2 Transport CO 2 / GDP ppp (Tg/1 9 US$ 2 ),15,1 Spain UK France Germany Italy,5 196 197 198 199 2 Time/ Year

Future 212 big countries,2 Transport CO 2 / Transport CO 2 intensity of the economy 196-1999 and linear extrapolation for 2-212 - big EU countries GDP ppp (Tg/1 9 US$ 2 ),15,1,5 R 2 =,5144 R 2 =,3884 R 2 =,8532 R 2 =,788 R 2 =,8714 Spain UK France Germany Italy 196 197 198 199 2 212

Future 212 big countries,2 Transport CO 2 / GDP ppp (Tg/1 9 US$ 2 ),15 Transport CO 2 intensity of the economy 196-1999 and second order polynomial extrapolation for 2-212 - big EU countries R 2 =,7522 R 2 =,444 R 2 =,8535 Spain UK France,1,5 R 2 =,834 R 2 =,9142 Germany Italy 196 197 198 199 2 212

History 196-1999: Little central and southern countries Transport CO 2 intensity of the economy 196-1999 - little central and southern EU countries,25 Transport CO 2 / GDP ppp,2 (Tg/1 9 US$ 2 ),15,1,5 Luxembourg Greece Ireland Portugal Belgium Netherlands Austria 196 197 198 199 2 Time/Year

Future 212 little central and southern countries Transport CO 2 intensity of the economy 196-1999 and linear extrapolation for 2-212 - little central and southern EU countries,25 Transport CO 2 / R 2 =,9352 Luxembourg GDP ppp (Tg/1 9 US$ 2 ),2 R 2 =,972 Greece,15,1,5 R 2 =,376 R 2 =,8452 R 2 =,7673 R 2 =,7449 R 2 =,123 Ireland Portugal Belgium Netherlands Austria 196 197 198 199 2 212

Future 212 little central and southern countries Transport CO 2 intensity of the economy 196-1999 and second order polynomial extrapolation for 2-212 - little central and southern EU countries,25 Transport CO 2 / R 2 =,947 Luxembourg GDP ppp (Tg/1 9 US$ 2 ),2 R 2 =,926 Greece,15,1 R 2 =,928 R 2 =,8125 R 2 =,165 Portugal Belgium Aus tria,5 R 2 =,8628 R 2 =,5666 Netherlands Ireland 196 197 198 199 2 212

History 196-1999: Nordic countries Transport CO 2 intensity of the economy 196-1999 - nordic EU countries Transport CO 2 / GDP ppp (Tg/1 9 US$ 2 ),2,15,1 Sweden Finland Denmark,5 196 197 198 199 2 Time/ Year

Future 212 nordic countries Transport CO 2 / Transport CO 2 intensity of the economy 196-1999 and linear extrapolation for 2-212 - nordic EU countries,2 GDP ppp (Tg/1 9 US$ 2 ),15 R 2 =,3574 R 2 =,1638 Finland Sweden,1 R 2 =,1265 Denmark,5 196 197 198 199 2 212

Future 212 nordic countries Transport CO 2 /,2 Transport CO 2 intensity of the economy 196-1999 and second order polynomial extrapolation for 2-212 - nordic EU countries GDP ppp (Tg/1 9 US$ 2 ),15,1 R 2 =,374 Sweden,5 R 2 =,664 R 2 =,651 Finland Denmark 196 197 198 199 2 212

Comparison of EU15, USA and Japan Transport CO 2 intensity of the economy History 196-1999 Future 2-212

History 196-1999: EU15, USA and Japan Transport CO 2 / GDP ppp (Tg/1 9 US$ 2 ),3,25,2,15,1 USA EU15 Japan,5 196 197 198 199 2 Time/ Year

Future 212 - EU15, USA and Japan Transport CO 2 intensity of the economy 196-1999 and linear extrapolation for 2-212 - EU15, USA and Japan Transport CO 2 / GDP ppp (Tg/1 9 US$ 2 ),3,25,2,15,1,5 R 2 =,7669 R 2 =,9171 R 2 =,338 USA EU15 Japan 196 197 198 199 2 212

Future 212 - EU15, USA and Japan Transport CO 2 / GDP ppp (Tg/1 9 US$ 2 ) Transport CO 2 intensity of the economy 196-1999 and linear extrapolation for 2-212 - EU15, USA and Japan,3,25,2,15,1 R 2 =,9173 R 2 =,356 EU15 Japan,5 R 2 =,865 USA 196 197 198 199 2 212

Discussion Substance Transport is an exceptional sector as the CO 2 intensity of the economy has not decreased The countries receiving a lot of EU structural funding have had high CO 2 growth rates USA has had decreasing transport CO 2 intensity figures but was still twice as high as EU15 in 1999 Methodology Extrapolation should be used very cautiously even in what if studies and even with BAU analyses