National Foreclosure Report



Similar documents
CoreLogic National Foreclosure Report

Equity Report FOURTH QUARTER 2014

CoreLogic Equity Report

2016 Individual Exchange Premiums updated November 4, 2015

STATE INCOME TAX WITHHOLDING INFORMATION DOCUMENT

INTRODUCTION. Figure 1. Contributions by Source and Year: (Billions of dollars)

LexisNexis Law Firm Billable Hours Survey Top Line Report. June 11, 2012

VCF Program Statistics (Represents activity through the end of the day on June 30, 2015)

Notices of Cancellation / Nonrenewal and / or Other Related Forms

ANTHONY P. CARNEVALE NICOLE SMITH JEFF STROHL

Hail-related claims under comprehensive coverage

United States Bankruptcy Court District of Arizona NOTICE TO: DEBTOR ATTORNEYS, BANKRUPTCY PETITION PREPARERS AND DEBTORS

COMMERCIAL FINANCE ASSOCIATION. Annual Asset-Based Lending and Factoring Surveys, 2008

United States Bankruptcy Court District of Arizona

ENS Governmental Format Status (As of 06/16/2008)

Table 1: Advertising, Marketing and Promotional Expense as a Percentage of Net Operating Revenue

50-State Analysis. School Attendance Age Limits. 700 Broadway, Suite 810 Denver, CO Fax:

Foreign Language Enrollments in K 12 Public Schools: Are Students Prepared for a Global Society?

Health Insurance Exchanges and the Medicaid Expansion After the Supreme Court Decision: State Actions and Key Implementation Issues

Cancellation of Debt (COD) R. Bruce McCommons Harford County, MD TrC 12/4/2013

Alaska (AK) Arizona (AZ) Arkansas (AR) California-RN (CA-RN) Colorado (CO)

AAIS Mobile-Homeowners 2008 Series

Health Insurance Coverage of Children Under Age 19: 2008 and 2009

Cancellation/Nonrenewal Surplus Lines Exemptions

Rates are valid through March 31, 2014.

Annual Survey of Public Employment & Payroll Summary Report: 2013

How To Regulate Rate Regulation

Health Insurance Price Index Report for Open Enrollment and Q May 2014

Benefits of Selling WorkLife 65

kaiser medicaid and the uninsured commission on The Cost and Coverage Implications of the ACA Medicaid Expansion: National and State-by-State Analysis

STATE SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM PARTICIPATION RATES IN 2009 FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICE

FR Y-14Q: Retail US Auto Loan Schedule Instructions

Community College/Technical Institute Mission Convergence Study

How To Get A National Rac (And Mac)

Required Minimum Distribution Election Form for IRA s, 403(b)/TSA and other Qualified Plans

The Case for Change The Case for Whopping Big Change

NEW CARRIER SIGN UP REQUEST FORM

THE FUTURE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN TEXAS

Arizona Form 2014 Credit for Taxes Paid to Another State or Country 309

Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Forms

TABLE 1. Didactic/Clinical/Lab SEMESTER TWO (Apply for admission to Nursing Program during Semester Two)

Alaska (AK) Arizona (AZ) Arkansas (AR) California-RN (CA-RN) Colorado (CO)

Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Forms

Approved Mortgage Insurance Forms

How To Compare Ehealth To A Health Insurance Plan

Public School Teacher Experience Distribution. Public School Teacher Experience Distribution

*Time is listed as approximate as an offender may be charged with other crimes which may add on to the sentence.

Alabama Commission of Higher Education P. O. Box Montgomery, AL. Alabama

Recent Trends in Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment: Analysis of CMS Performance Measure Data through August 2014

Three-Year Moving Averages by States % Home Internet Access

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FORMATION

recovery: Projections of Jobs and Education Requirements Through 2020 June 2013

Closing the College Attainment Gap between the U.S. and Most Educated Countries, and the Contributions to be made by the States

ONLINE SERVICES FOR KEY LOW-INCOME BENEFIT PROGRAMS What States Provide Online with Respect to SNAP, TANF, Child Care Assistance, Medicaid, and CHIP

STATE PERSONAL INCOME TAXES ON PENSIONS & RETIREMENT INCOME: TAX YEAR 2010

APPENDIX B. STATE AGENCY ADDRESSES FOR INTERSTATE UIB CLAIMS

Resource Brief: Ombudsman Program Data Management Systems

AAIS Personal and Premises Liability Program

TAX PREP FEE PHILOSOPHY. Copyright 2013 Drake Software

Audio Monitoring And The Law: How to Use Audio Legally in Security Systems. Today s Learning Objectives

Driving under the influence of alcohol or

Marketplaces (Exchanges): Information for Employers and Individuals Lisa Klinger, J.D.

NCCI Filing Memorandum Item B-1420

8. Network Usage and Growth

Pro Hac Vice Admission Rules

Impacts of Sequestration on the States

Cost and Benefits of Individual and Family Health Insurance. December 2013

Radiologic Sciences Staffing and Workplace Survey 2015

Workers Compensation State Guidelines & Availability

NON-RESIDENT INDEPENDENT, PUBLIC, AND COMPANY ADJUSTER LICENSING CHECKLIST

Health Coverage for the Hispanic Population Today and Under the Affordable Care Act

NYCOM 2009 Entering Class - Matriculant Comparison Data

22 States do not provide access to Chapter 9 Bankruptcy

Economic and Personal Finance Education in Our Nation s Schools

Chex Systems, Inc. does not currently charge a fee to place, lift or remove a freeze; however, we reserve the right to apply the following fees:

How To Get An R22 In Massachusetts

2015 Mortgage Fraud Report

Health Reform. Health Insurance Market Reforms: Pre-Existing Condition Exclusions

MAINE (Augusta) Maryland (Annapolis) MICHIGAN (Lansing) MINNESOTA (St. Paul) MISSISSIPPI (Jackson) MISSOURI (Jefferson City) MONTANA (Helena)

Impact of Undocumented Populations on 2010 Congressional Reapportionment

FAMILY LAW DIVORCE AND DISSOLUTION ALIMONY, MAINTENANCE, AND OTHER SPOUSAL SUPPORT (STATUTES) Thomson Reuters/West August 2010

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES

Table of Mortgage Broker (and Originator) Bond Laws by State Current as of July 1, 2010

Department of Banking and Finance

Building Codes in Effect by State

CPT Codes For Spirometry

Use and Characteristics of Electronic Health Record Systems Among Office-based Physician Practices: United States,

Mitigating the Loss of Private Insurance With Public Coverage for the Under-65 Population: 2008 to 2012

ASNT Conference Edition - Fall Salary Survey Your Path to the Perfect Job Starts Here.

State Insurance Information

First-Time Homebuyer Share and House Price Growth Page 2

The Vermont Legislative Research Shop

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 12, 2013

The Nation s Report Card

AAIS Commercial Umbrella Liability Program

University of Saint Joseph College of Pharmacy

Englishinusa.com Positions in MSN under different search terms.

Legislative Summary Sheet: Bills Related to Military Families Recently Introduced into State Legislatures

High Risk Health Pools and Plans by State

Transcription:

National Foreclosure Report JANUARY 2015

2.7% In January, the foreclosure inventory was down 2.7 percent from December 20, representing 39 months of consecutive year-overyear declines. Job growth and homevalue appreciation have worked to push the serious delinquency rate to the lowest since mid-2008 and foreclosures down by onethird from a year ago. With economic growth in 2015 expected to be better than last year, further declines in both delinquencies and foreclosures are projected for this year. Frank Nothaft, chief economist at CoreLogic 2015 CoreLogic Proprietary and confidential. This material may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. 2

National Overview through January 2015 There Were 43,000 Completed Foreclosures Nationally, Down From 55,000 in January 20 Seriously Delinquent Rate Is at 4.0 Percent Lowest Level Since June 2008 Approximately 549,000 homes in the United States were in some stage of foreclosure compared to 822,000 in January 20 Completed Foreclosures 43K 22.5%.7% in January 2015 Decline Year Over Year Compared to December 20 A CoreLogic analysis shows 43,000 foreclosures were completed in January 2015, a 22.5 percent year-over-year decline from 55,000* in January 20. By comparison, before the decline in the housing market in 2007, completed foreclosures averaged 21,000 per month nationwide between 2000 and 2006. On a month-over-month* basis, completed foreclosures were up by.7 percent. Completed foreclosures are an indication of the total number of homes actually lost to foreclosure. * January 20 data was revised. Revisions with public records are standard and to ensure accuracy, CoreLogic incorporates newly released data to provide updated results. 2015 CoreLogic Proprietary and confidential. This material may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. JANUARY 2015 3

National Foreclosure Inventory THE CURRENT FORECLOSURE RATE OF 1.4 PERCENT IS THE LOWEST INVENTORY LEVEL SINCE MARCH 2008. 33.2% 1.4% Compared to January 20 Of All Homes with a Mortgage Approximately 549,000 homes in the United States were in some stage of foreclosure as of January 2015, compared to 822,000 in January* 20, a decrease of 33.2 percent. This was the 39th consecutive month with a year-over-year decline. As of January 2015, the foreclosure inventory represented 1.4 percent of all homes with a mortgage, compared to 2.0 percent in January 20. * January 20 data was revised. Revisions with public records are standard and to ensure accuracy, CoreLogic incorporates newly released data to provide updated results. The foreclosure inventory continues to shrink with declines in all 50 states over the past 12 months. Florida, one of the hardest hit states during the foreclosure crisis, experienced a decline of almost 50 percent year over year which is outstanding news. Anand Nallathambi, president and CEO of CoreLogic 2015 CoreLogic Proprietary and confidential. This material may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. 4

Time Series National Overview FEB- MAR- APR- MAY- JUN- JUL- AUG- SEP- OCT- NOV- DEC- JAN- 15 Serious Delinquency* 1,897 1,826 1,776 1,733 1,707 1,677 1,658 1,634 1,587 1,585 1,561 1,538 -MOM % Chg in # -6.0% -3.7% -2.7% -2.4% -1.5% -1.8% -1.1% -1.5% -2.9% -0.1% -1.5% -1.5% -YOY % Chg in # Foreclosure Inventory* -MOM % Chg in # -YOY % Chg in # -25.6% -25.9% -25.1% -25.2% -25.9% -25.8% -24.0% -24.0% -24.7% -24.0% -24.1% -23.8% 761 729 694 675 663 647 626 618 586 569 564 549-7.4% -4.2% -4.8% -2.8% -1.7% -2.4% -3.2% -1.3% -5.1% -3.1% -0.8% -2.7% -35.3% -37.4% -36.4% -37.1% -36.0% -36.2% -35.8% -34.9% -34.9% -37.4% -35.1% -33.2% 4.0% THE NUMBER OF MORTGAGES IN SERIOUS DELINQUENCY IS AT 4.0 PERCENT IN JANUARY 2015 Completed Foreclosures* 46 48 49 50 49 47 42 63 44 34 37 43 -MOM % Chg in # -17.0% 4.2% 2.7% 1.1% -1.5% -3.4% -10.6% 49.4% -29.6% -23.8% 1.7% -YOY % Chg in # -12.3% -11.6% -.8% -6.4% -11.1% -18.4% -28.4% -8.1% -21.1% -27.4% -18.8% -22.5% -12-Month Sum* 655 649 640 637 631 620 603 598 586 573 564 552 *Thousands of Units THE FORECLOSURE INVENTORY RECORDED 39 STRAIGHT MONTHS OF DECLINES 2015 CoreLogic Proprietary and confidential. This material may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. JANUARY 2015 5

Foreclosure Inventory by State 36 states have an inventory of foreclosed homes lower than the national rate 1.6% 0.3% 1.2% 2.2% 0.8% 0.4% 2.1% 0.6% 0.4% 0.9% 1.4% 1.9% 1.4% 0.7% 0.6% 4.0% 1.3% 0.8% 1.6% 0.9% 1.8% 2.1% 5.2% 1.8% 1.3% 1.4% 0.8% 0.6% 2.0% 0.6% 1.2% 2.5% 0.8% 0.7% 0.9% 1.4% 1.0% 0.8% 0.8% 4 states with highest foreclosure inventory as a percentage of mortgaged h 1.2% 0.7% jan 2015 3.5% 2.7% Twenty-four states Show declines of more than 30 percent in year-overyear foreclosure inventory, with Florida ( 49.0%) and Maine ( 49.5%) experiencing the greatest year-over-year declines As of January 2015 Source: CoreLogic Market Trends 0.3% 5.2% Four states and the District of Columbia with the highest foreclosure inventory as a percentage of mortgaged homes 5 states with lowest foreclosure inventory as a percentage of mortgaged ho jan 2015 New Jersey New York Florida Hawaii D.C. 2.7% 2.5% 3.5% 4.0% 5.2% Five states with the lowest foreclosure inventory as a percentage of mortgaged homes Alaska Nebraska North Dakota Arizona Montana 0.3% 0.4% 0.4% 2015 CoreLogic Proprietary and confidential. This material may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. 6

State Highlights 111,000 These five states account for almost half of all completed foreclosures nationally. 511 532 Judicial Non-Judicial Percent of Homes in Foreclosure AK ND NE MT AZ WY UT CO MN VA CA MO SDMI TN GA WI TX NH NC AL WV ID AR KS WA MS IA MA KY LA OH VT IN OK SC OR PA RI ME IL NM MD DE NV CT DC NY FL HI NJ 51,000 34,000 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% Source: CoreLogic January 2015 30,000 28,000 FL MI TX CA GA Five states with the highest number of completed foreclosures during past 12 months 22 66 336 SD DC ND WV WY Four states and the District of Columbia, with the lowest number of completed foreclosures during past 12 months Judicial 5.19x4.29 Layout>axes>primary horizontal axis>show right to left axis 8.5pt and 5.5pt Non-Judicial All states posted a year-over-year, double-digit decline in foreclosures; with the exception of Wyoming, which experienced a 0.2 percent decrease; The District of Columbia, which experienced a 22.1 percent increase; and Massachusetts which experienced a 4.4 percent decrease. 2015 CoreLogic Proprietary and confidential. This material may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. JANUARY 2015 7

State Foreclosure Data Judicial States JUDICIAL STATES FORECLOSURE INVENTORY FORECLOSURE INVENTORY PCT. POINT CHANGE FROM A YEAR AGO COMPLETED FORECLOSURES (12 MONTHS ENDING JAN 2015) SERIOUS DELINQUENCY RATE National Foreclosure Inventory: 1.4% Foreclosure Inventory Pct. Point Change from a Year Ago: 0.6% Completed Foreclosures (12 months ending January 2015): 552,048 Serious Delinquency: 4.0% Decline in Seriously Delinquent Mortgages: 23.8% YOY Florida 3.5% -2.9% 111,321 7.7% Ohio 1.4% -0.6% 27,891 4.4% Pennsylvania 1.8% -0.6% 19,099 4.9% Illinois 1.8% -1.1% 16,848 5.0% Indiana 1.3% -0.6%,870 4.1% Oklahoma 1.4% - 9,656 3.9% Maryland 2.0% -1.0% 8,971 5.7% New York 4.0% -0.8% 8,234 7.2% New Jersey 5.2% -1.1% 8,216 8.9% South Carolina 1.4% -0.6% 7,298 4.0% Louisiana 1.2% -0.4% 6,608 4.7% Connecticut 2.1% -1.2% 5,731 5.4% Iowa 0.9% - 4,865 2.6% Oregon 1.6% -0.8% 4,797 3.6% Kentucky 1.2% -0.4% 3,582 3.8% Massachusetts 1.3% 0.0% 3,339 4.1% Kansas 0.9% -0.2% 3,194 3.2% New Mexico 2.1% -0.4% 1,616 4.3% Delaware 1.9% -0.6% 1,549 5.1% Nebraska 0.4% -0.2% 1,435 2.0% Hawaii 2.7% -0.6% 927 4.5% Maine 1.9% -1.6% 859 5.5% North Dakota 0.4% -0.1% 336 1.0% South Dakota 0.6% -0.1%. 1.8% Vermont 1.4% -0.6%. 3.2% Source: CoreLogic January 2015 2015 CoreLogic Proprietary and confidential. This material may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. 8

State Foreclosure Data Non-Judicial States NON-JUDICIAL STATES FORECLOSURE INVENTORY FORECLOSURE INVENTORY PCT. POINT CHANGE FROM A YEAR AGO COMPLETED FORECLOSURES (12 MONTHS ENDING JAN 2015) SERIOUS DELINQUENCY RATE Michigan 0.6% -0.3% 50,670 3.0% Texas 0.7% -0.2% 33,588 3.0% California -0.2% 29,720 2.0% Georgia 0.8% -0.4% 28,410 3.9% North Carolina 0.8% -0.3% 20,065 3.4% Tennessee 0.7% -0.2%,389 3.9% Washington 1.2% -0.6% 13,420 3.2% Arizona -0.2% 13,299 2.0% Missouri 0.6% -0.1% 11,786 3.0% Virginia 0.6% -0.2% 10,959 2.6% Alabama 0.8% -0.4% 8,718 4.5% Nevada 2.2% -0.8% 8,602 5.3% National Foreclosure Inventory: 1.4% Foreclosure Inventory Pct. Point Change from a Year Ago: 0.6% Completed Foreclosures (12 months ending January 2015): 552,048 Serious Delinquency: 4.0% Decline in Seriously Delinquent Mortgages: 23.8% YOY Wisconsin 0.7% -0.3% 6,419 2.5% Minnesota -0.1% 6,065 2.2% Colorado -0.2% 5,893 1.7% Arkansas 0.9% - 4,518 4.4% Idaho 0.8% -0.6% 3,636 2.5% Utah -0.4% 3,525 2.2% New Hampshire 0.8% -0.1% 1,680 2.9% Rhode Island 1.6% - 1,531 5.5% Mississippi 1.0% -0.3% 1,060 5.6% Alaska 0.3% -0.1% 889 1.4% Montana -0.2% 832 1.7% Wyoming 0.0% 532 1.8% West Virginia 0.8% -0.1% 511 3.3% District of Columbia 2.5% 66 4.4% Source: CoreLogic January 2015 2015 CoreLogic Proprietary and confidential. This material may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. JANUARY 2015 9

Metropolitan Area Highlights Foreclosure Data for the Largest Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs) METROPOLITAN AREA FORECLOSURE INVENTORY FORECLOSURE INVENTORY PCT. POINT CHANGE FROM A YEAR AGO COMPLETED FORECLOSURES (12 MONTHS ENDING JAN 2015) SERIOUS DELINQUENCY RATE Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 4.5% -3.0% 17,235 8.7% Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA 0.8% -0.4% 15,286 3.8% Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 3.2% -3.3% 15,053 7.4% Chicago-Naperville-Arlington Heights, IL 2.1% -1.2% 8,530 5.7% Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 0.4% -0.2% 7,832 1.8% Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 0.7% -0.2% 7,590 2.9% Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 0.8% -0.2% 6,323 3.1% St. Louis, MO-IL 0.7% -0.2% 5,813 3.3% Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX 0.7% -0.2% 5,447 3.0% Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC 0.9% - 5,185 3.5% Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI -0.1% 4,961 2.1% Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD 2.1% -1.0% 4,947 5.9% Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA 0.6% -0.2% 4,822 2.3% New York-Jersey City-White Plains, NY-NJ 4.1% -0.9% 4,366 7.2% Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI 0.4% -0.3% 4,068 2.2% Source: CoreLogic January 2015 2015 CoreLogic Proprietary and confidential. This material may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. 10

National Foreclosure Report Methodology The data in this report represents foreclosure activity reported through January 2015. This report separates state data into judicial versus non-judicial foreclosure state categories. In judicial foreclosure states, lenders must provide evidence to the courts of delinquency in order to move a borrower into foreclosure. In non-judicial foreclosure states, lenders can issue notices of default directly to the borrower without court intervention. This is an important distinction since judicial states, as a rule, have longer foreclosure timelines, thus affecting foreclosure statistics. A completed foreclosure occurs when a property is auctioned and results in the purchase of the home at auction by either a third party, such as an investor, or by the lender. If the home is purchased by the lender, it is moved into the lender s real estate owned (REO) inventory. In foreclosure by advertisement states, a redemption period begins after the auction and runs for a statutory period, e.g., six months. During that period, the borrower may regain the foreclosed home by paying all amounts due as calculated under the statute. For purposes of this Foreclosure Report, because so few homes are actually redeemed following an auction, it is assumed that the foreclosure process ends in foreclosure by advertisement states at the completion of the auction. The foreclosure inventory represents the number and share of mortgaged homes that have been placed into the process of foreclosure by the mortgage servicer. Mortgage servicers start the foreclosure process when the mortgage reaches a specific level of serious delinquency as dictated by the investor for the mortgage loan. Once a foreclosure is started, and absent the borrower paying all amounts necessary to halt the foreclosure, the home remains in foreclosure until the completed foreclosure results in the sale to a third party at auction or the home enters the lender s REO inventory. The data in this report accounts for only first liens against a property and does not include secondary liens. The foreclosure inventory is measured only against homes that have an outstanding mortgage. Homes with no mortgage liens can never be in foreclosure and are, therefore, excluded from the analysis. Approximately one-third of homes nationally are owned outright and do not have a mortgage. CoreLogic has approximately 85 percent coverage of U.S. foreclosure data. SOURCE: CORELOGIC The data provided is for use only by the primary recipient or the primary recipient s publication or broadcast. This data may not be re-sold, republished or licensed to any other source, including publications and sources owned by the primary recipient s parent company without prior written permission from CoreLogic. Any CoreLogic data used for publication or broadcast, in whole or in part, must be sourced as coming from CoreLogic, a data and analytics company. For use with broadcast or web content, the citation must directly accompany first reference of the data. If the data is illustrated with maps, charts, graphs or other visual elements, the CoreLogic logo must be included on screen or website. Data provided may not be modified without the prior written permission of CoreLogic. Do not use the data in any unlawful manner. This data is compiled from public records, contributory databases and proprietary analytics, and its accuracy is dependent upon these sources. ABOUT CORELOGIC CoreLogic (NYSE: CLGX) is a leading global property information, analytics and data-enabled services provider. The company s combined data from public, contributory and proprietary sources includes over 3.5 billion records spanning more than 40 years, providing detailed coverage of property, mortgages and other encumbrances, consumer credit, tenancy, location, hazard risk and related performance information. The markets CoreLogic serves include real estate and mortgage finance, insurance, capital markets, and the public sector. CoreLogic delivers value to clients through unique data, analytics, workflow technology, advisory and managed services. Clients rely on CoreLogic to help identify and manage growth opportunities, improve performance and mitigate risk. Headquartered in Irvine, Calif., CoreLogic operates in North America, Western Europe and Asia Pacific. For more information, please visit www.corelogic.com. CORELOGIC, the CoreLogic logo are trademarks of CoreLogic, Inc. and/or its subsidiaries. CONTACT For more information, please email bvisini@corelogic.com. 2015 CoreLogic Proprietary and confidential. This material may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. JANUARY 2015 11

For an expanded perspective on housing economies and property markets, visit the CoreLogic Insights Blog and follow us on: CoreLogic CoreLogic Econ corelogic.com 2015 CoreLogic, Inc. All rights reserved. CORELOGIC and the CoreLogic logo are trademarks of CoreLogic, Inc. and/or its subsidiaries. All other trademarks are the property of their respective holders. 17-NFR-JAN15-0315-01