PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

Similar documents
EVIPNet Capacity-Building Workshop Ethiopian Health and Nutrition Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 18 to 22 February 2008

Adalimumab for the treatment of psoriasis

Breast cancer treatment for elderly women: a systematic review

PCORI Methodology Standards: Academic Curriculum Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. All Rights Reserved.

TITLE: Cannabinoids for the Treatment of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

Characteristics of studies

Assessing study quality: critical appraisal. MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit

University of Hawai i Human Studies Program. Guidelines for Developing a Clinical Research Protocol

Cochrane Review: Psychological treatments for depression and anxiety in dementia and mild cognitive impairment

Biostat Methods STAT 5820/6910 Handout #6: Intro. to Clinical Trials (Matthews text)

Protocol registration and outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials of

Patient Reported Outcomes

Distance Education as a Training Tool for Health Professionals: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

PEER REVIEW HISTORY ARTICLE DETAILS

The Campbell Collaboration Study content coding Effect size coding (next session)

Data Extraction and Quality Assessment

How To Write A Systematic Review

18/11/2013. Getting the Searches off to a good start: Scoping the Literature and Devising a Search Strategy

Carol Lefebvre Senior Information Specialist UK Cochrane Centre National Institute for Health Research Oxford, UK

Application of Clinical Trial Certificate of Chinese Medicines in Hong Kong

2016 PQRS OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY

UCB. Certolizumab pegol (CIMZIA ) for the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis PATIENT ACCESS SCHEME (PAS) SUBMISSION TO NICE

Version 1.3. Versions

PCORI Methodology Standards: Academic Curriculum Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. All Rights Reserved.

Best supportive care: Do we know what it is?

Bach Flower Remedies for pain relief and psychological problems

Reception baseline: criteria for potential assessments

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT. NHMRC advice on the effectiveness of homeopathy for treating health conditions

Study Designs. Simon Day, PhD Johns Hopkins University

The Importance and Impact of Nursing Informatics Competencies for Baccalaureate Nursing Students and Registered Nurses

Title Registration for a Systematic Review: Tutoring Programs to Improve Educational Outcomes in Children Aged Four to Eleven

NKR 13 Alkoholbehandling. Disulfiram for alcohol dependency

Psoriasis, Incidence, Quality of Life, Psoriatic Arthritis, Prevalence

Phone:

Evidence-based Practice Center Comparative Effectiveness Review Protocol

MIND-BODY THERAPIES FOR HYPERTENSION

Treatment of seizures in multiple sclerosis (Review)

Wales Patient Access Scheme: Process Guidance

ChangingPractice. Appraising Systematic Reviews. Evidence Based Practice Information Sheets for Health Professionals. What Are Systematic Reviews?

Prepared by:jane Healey ( 4 th year undergraduate occupational therapy student, University of Western Sydney

Maths Mastery in Primary Schools

Guidelines for AJO-DO submissions: Randomized Clinical Trials June 2015

Effect of liraglutide on body weight in overweight or obese subjects with type 2 diabetes: SCALE - Diabetes

Systematic Reviews in JNEB

TUTORIAL on ICH E9 and Other Statistical Regulatory Guidance. Session 1: ICH E9 and E10. PSI Conference, May 2011

ustekinumab 45mg solution for injection in pre-filled syringe (Stelara ) SMC No. (944/14) Janssen-Cilag Ltd

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT GAINING NHS RESEARCH PERMISSION FROM CARDIFF AND VALE UHB - GUIDANCE FOR RESEARCHERS. Research Governance Group

Form B-1. Inclusion form for the effectiveness of different methods of toilet training for bowel and bladder control

2016 PQRS OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY

Systematic review of a health system intervention:

Product: Tazarotene, cream, 500 micrograms per g (0.05%) and 1.0 mg per g (0.1%), 30 g, Zorac

REGULATIONS FOR THE POSTGRADUATE DIPLOMA IN CLINICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (PDipClinResMethodology)

Measure #1 (NQF 0059): Diabetes: Hemoglobin A1c Poor Control National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

1.0 Abstract. Title: Real Life Evaluation of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Canadians taking HUMIRA. Keywords. Rationale and Background:

Reporting guidelines: past, present and future

NKR 33 Urininkontinens, PICO 3: Bør kvinder med urininkontinens tilbydes behandling

Summary HTA. HTA-Report Summary. Introduction

Research funding applications involving Cardiff & Vale UHB. Emma Lewis R&D Coordinator. Cardiff and Vale UHB Bwrdd lechyd Prifysgol Caerdydd a r Fro

Digital Health: Catapulting Personalised Medicine Forward STRATIFIED MEDICINE

Instrument: Nail Assessment in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis

Evaluation of a Primary Care Dermatology Service: final report

GUIDELINE. Process of information retrieval for systematic reviews and health technology assessments on clinical effectiveness.

påçííáëü=jéçáåáåéë=`çåëçêíáìã==

Internet Applications and Web Development

Patient Assistance Application for HUMIRA (adalimumab)

Is Monotherapy Treatment of Etanercept Effective Against Plaque Psoriasis?

Clinical Study Design and Methods Terminology

PEER REVIEW HISTORY ARTICLE DETAILS TITLE (PROVISIONAL)

Red Light Camera Interventions for Reducing Traffic Violations and Accidents: A Systematic Review

Not All Clinical Trials Are Created Equal Understanding the Different Phases

GUIDELINES FOR REVIEWING QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTIVE STUDIES

Val Robson University Hospital Aintree. Liverpool U.K.

Principles of Systematic Review: Focus on Alcoholism Treatment

This short paper/article presents in straightforward

REGULATIONS FOR THE POSTGRADUATE CERTIFICATE IN PUBLIC HEALTH (PCPH) (Subject to approval)

PEER REVIEW HISTORY ARTICLE DETAILS VERSION 1 - REVIEW. Hongcai Shang Beijing university of Chinese medicine, China 11-Nov-2015

Trial Description. Organizational Data. Secondary IDs

Critical Appraisal of a Research Paper

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY 2012

Promoting professional behaviour change in healthcare what interventions work, and why? Protocol for a theory-led overview of systematic reviews

C2 Training: June 8 9, 2010

Journal Club: Niacin in Patients with Low HDL Cholesterol Levels Receiving Intensive Statin Therapy by the AIM-HIGH Investigators

ADVANCE: a factorial randomised trial of blood pressure lowering and intensive glucose control in 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes

4. The criteria for the award of the Degree of PhD (by Published Works) shall be the same as those established for the Degree of PhD by Research.

Searching for systematic reviews. Candida Fenton Information Scientist University of Glasgow

School Teacher Registration Guidance for Employers. (Local Authorities, Schools and Private Supply Teaching Agencies)

Getting access to NPD data for EEF evaluations: Advice for evaluators

Familieorienteret alkoholbehandling versus Individuel alkoholbehandling for

A Compendium of Critical Appraisal Tools for Public Health Practice

Mary B Codd. MD, MPH, PhD, FFPHMI UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy & Pop. Sciences

Article Four Different Types of Evidence / Literature Reviews

Clinical Trials in Geriatric Oncology. Anita O Donovan Assistant Professor, Trinity College Dublin &

The QuEST for a decent place to live.

33 % of whiplash patients develop. headaches originating from the upper. cervical spine

What factors determine poor functional outcome following Total Knee Replacement (TKR)?

CBT versus TAU for ADHD Review information

The people needed to complete the costs for a funding application are:

A Guide To Producing an Evidence-based Report

An Assessment of the Cost-Utility of Therapy for Psoriasis

Transcription:

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews A systematic review of the impact on quality of life of topical, systemic and biologic therapies for psoriasis Faraz Ali, Andrea Cueva, Ausama Atwan, Sam Salek, Andrew Finlay, Vincent Piguet, Jui Vyas Citation Faraz Ali, Andrea Cueva, Ausama Atwan, Sam Salek, Andrew Finlay, Vincent Piguet, Jui Vyas. A systematic review of the impact on quality of life of topical, systemic and biologic therapies for psoriasis. PROSPERO 2015:CRD42015009193 Available from http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero_rebranding/display_record.asp?id=crd42015009193 Review question(s) What evidence is there that any therapies for psoriasis have an impact on Health-Related Quality of Life? Searches The following databases to be searched: OVID MEDLINE OVID MEDLINE: In Process EMBASE Web of Science Core Collection Scopus Cochrane Databas Trials registers: The metaregister of Controlled Trials (http://www.isrctn.com). The US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register (www.clinicaltrials.gov). The Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (www.anzctr.org.au). The World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry platform (www.who.int/trialsearch). The EU Clinical Trials Register (https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/). Types of study to be included We included randomised controlled trials including cross-over trials and trials with open-label extensions. Only papers where the total scores for the QoL tools were provided were included. An exception is when the QoL questionnaires are validated to be reported as subscales. Condition or domain being studied Psoriasis and Quality of Life outcomes Participants/ population Types of participants Page: 1 / 5

Adults (age 18 and over) of either sex and of any ethnicity, with a clinical diagnosis of psoriasis. We included all subtypes of psoriasis. If the subjects suffer with a co-morbidity such as psoriatic arthritis, a skin-related quality of life scale must be included Exclusion criteria: - Psoriatic arthritis studies where it is not possible to differentiate arthritis quality of life from psoriasis quality of life data will be excluded. - Studies which include any patient less than 18 years of age. - Articles where the change in QoL values cannot be reliably calculated will be excluded. This includes graphical representation. - For consistency, QoL data only presented as sub-scales, where total scores are usually calculated, were excluded. Abstracts and posters where further data is not available upon contacting the author, were also excluded. Intervention(s), exposure(s) We included all randomised controlled trials with any intervention used for the treatment of psoriasis including, but not limited to: systemic therapy, topical therapy and psychological therapy. Comparator(s)/ control These trials included comparisons of any intervention with placebo or another active intervention. Outcome(s) Primary outcomes All quality of life scores with any quality of life scale Secondary outcomes 1. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score or 2. The proportion of participants attaining PASI 50, 75, and 90, defined as a 50%, 75%, or 90% reduction in PASI score relative to the baseline PASI score immediately prior to treatment initiation or 3. If 1 or 2 not available, the primary Psoriasis Severity Scale used will be recorded Data extraction, (selection and coding) Selection of studies: Two authors (FA and AC) will independently compare the titles and abstracts of the studies retrieved by the searches with the inclusion criteria. They will examine the full texts of studies that potentially meet the criteria, as well as the studies whose abstracts do not provide sufficient information. A third author (AA) will resolve any disagreements in terms of final study selection. We will record the reasons for exclusion of studies. Data extraction and management: Two authors (FA and AC) will independently extract data using a data extraction form based on the 'Checklist of items to consider in data collection or data extraction' found in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins 2011). A third author (AA) will resolve any disagreements. Two authors (FA and AC) will pilot the data collection form prior to use. Risk of bias (quality) assessment Two authors (FA and AC) will independently assess the methodological quality of included studies using the The Cochrane Collaboration's 'Risk of bias' tool (Higgins 2011). The risk of bias will be graded as 'low', 'high', or 'unclear' Page: 2 / 5

for each of the following domains: (a) random sequence generation; (b) allocation concealment; (c) blinding of participants, personnel, and outcome assessment; (d) incomplete outcome data; (e) selective outcome reporting (we will check trial databases to ensure that reported outcomes match to those prospectively listed); and (f) other sources of bias. Strategy for data synthesis Data will be analysed using SPSS version 22 and Microsoft Excel 2011. The data will be mostly qualitative and descriptive, with basic quantitative analyses. A brief summary of the interventions along with quality of life outcomes will be aggregated. Analysis of subgroups or subsets Interventions will be grouped and analysed according to quality of life outcomes. Dissemination plans Abstracts at conferences and article publication Contact details for further information Dr Faraz Ali Department of Dermatology and Wound Healing 3rd Floor, Glamorgan House University Hospital of Wales Cardiff CF14 4XN alifm@cardiff.ac.uk Organisational affiliation of the review Cardiff University Review team Dr Faraz Ali, Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, 3rd Floor Glamorgan House, Heath Park, Cardiff, Wales, UK Dr Andrea Cueva, Ecuadorian National government through the National Institution of Higher Education, Science, Technology and Innovation (SENESCYT) Dr Ausama Atwan, Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, 3rd Floor Glamorgan Professor Sam Salek, Department of Pharmacy, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield and Institute for Medicines Development, Cardiff, UK Professor Andrew Finlay, Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, 3rd Floor Glamorgan Page: 3 / 5

Professor Vincent Piguet, Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, 3rd Floor Glamorgan Dr Jui Vyas, Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, 3rd Floor Glamorgan House, Heath Park, Cardiff, Wales, UK Anticipated or actual start date 01 November 2014 Anticipated completion date 30 October 2015 Funding sources/sponsors Cardiff University Conflicts of interest AY Finlay is joint copyright owner of the DLQI and Cardiff University receives some income from the use of the DLQI. AYF has had paid consultancies or advisory boards with Novartis, Napp Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Galderma. VP has received educational and/or research grants from Abbvie, Cellgene, Novartis, J&J. SS has received educational and/or research grants from Sanofi, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer & Sevier. F Ali, A Cueva and J Vyas declare no conflicts of interest. Language English Country Wales Subject index terms status Subject indexing assigned by CRD Subject index terms Health; Humans; Life; Psoriasis; Quality of Life Stage of review Completed but not published Date of registration in PROSPERO 13 May 2015 Date of publication of this revision 20 October 2015 DOI 10.15124/CRD42015009193 Stage of review at time of this submission Started Completed Preliminary searches Yes Yes Piloting of the study selection process Yes Yes Formal screening of search results against eligibility criteria Yes Yes Data extraction Yes No Page: 4 / 5

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Risk of bias (quality) assessment No No Data analysis No No PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews The information in this record has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Page: 5 / 5